GloryDayz |
12-19-2016 09:24 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut
(Post 12628573)
Yep. People are forgetting how bad 2014 was when our O-line was junk and our QB was running for his life to later have his spleen lacerate. We were stuck with a WR who wouldn't catch a TD all year and would sign with the Browns the following season to have less catches than Marcus Peters did interceptions.
3 of our 4 losses this 2016 season was decided by an average of 3.6 points. All losses have been to a playoff contending team. 2010 Packers lost 6 games by an average of 3.6 points before going on to win it all.
This forum needs to relax. Enjoy the games or I would suggest to quit watching. The debbie downers going on rants are making themselves and this place look pathetic.
|
If you don't think there are deep seeded issues with this team/system, you're nuts. You pull up a stat that's a little interesting by itself, but falls apart when other related stats are brought to the surface too...
How many games would this team have lost had it not been for ST or defensive scores? IOW, what would our record be had we only relied on the points the offense put up? Most people would agree that those things are awesome and entertaining, but I'm not sure there's anything you can dig up where Andy said, "we're not going to count on the offense to score enough points, our strategy is for STs and the defense to add enough points to what the O can muster to win games."
But alas, we're a Hunt owned team, he's like a little kid, Andy bought him ice cream after the game and they've forgotten it. It's part of their DNA, don't fix it, don't change anything, don't get mad, just ignore the problem and it's fix itself/go away. Lord knows it's been a profitable formula for the Hunts for the last 50 years, why tinker with it, right?
|