ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs' free-agent status....The Kansas City Star (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=111242)

C-Mac 03-03-2005 09:20 AM

Chiefs' free-agent status....The Kansas City Star
 
Really nothing new...

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/11036798.htm

Chiefs' free-agent checklist

The Kansas City Star


The status of the players the Chiefs are looking at this week:

• Samari Rolle, cornerback

Visited Wednesday; will wrap things up at Arrowhead today

• Jeremiah Trotter, linebacker

Visiting today; Chiefs want to make sure he can pass his physical

• Ed Hartwell, linebacker

Visiting today; 16 teams have inquired about his interest, according to agent

• Patrick Surtain, cornerback

Chiefs would like to bring him in, but Dolphins want more trade details worked out; they want second-round draft pick, which doesn't sit well with KC

BigRedChief 03-03-2005 09:22 AM

Ho Hum.....nothing to see here. And not a word about the purple limo stopped at Diamond Joes?

bricks 03-03-2005 09:23 AM

I don't understand, why the fuck Carl wouldn't give up a 2nd rounder for surtain? The guy is worth it! Now, it's understandable why Carl really sucks!

KCFalcon59 03-03-2005 09:25 AM

Without a 3rd round pick, giving up a 2nd for Surtain is too steep. IMO. Now if it was next years 2nd, I would jump on it.

C-Mac 03-03-2005 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks
I don't understand, why the fuck Carl wouldn't give up a 2nd rounder for surtain? The guy is worth it! Now, it's understandable why Carl really sucks!

Torn between two lovers...I want both!

HC_Chief 03-03-2005 09:26 AM

Quote:

Chiefs would like to bring him in, but Dolphins want more trade details worked out; they want second-round draft pick, which doesn't sit well with KC
And why the fuck not?! That makes no sense - "we want to keep our #2 pick because we're targeting some untested, unproven collegiate player" instead of nabbing a <i>guaranteed stud CB</i>?! If true, that's just frigging retarted[CP spelling].

CosmicPal 03-03-2005 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks
I don't understand, why the fuck Carl wouldn't give up a 2nd rounder for surtain? The guy is worth it! Now, it's understandable why Carl really sucks!

'Cause we don't have a third round pick in the draft. If everything passes with Surtain, he'll consider it, but if you look at the fact that we make this trade- come draft day- we'll only have a first rounder.

A DB these days is only as good as his front seven....

C-Mac 03-03-2005 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCFalcon59
Without a 3rd round pick, giving up a 2nd for Surtain is too steep. IMO. Now if it was next years 2nd, I would jump on it.

I would go for that :thumb: and maybe even add late round this year.

keg in kc 03-03-2005 09:27 AM

The reason we don't want to part with a #2 is because we don't have a #3 and they don't want to be left with just 1 first day pick. As I understand it, we're trying to get them to take a 2006 pick (or picks).

ChiTown 03-03-2005 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief
And why the fuck not?! That makes no sense - "we want to keep our #2 pick because we're targeting some untested, unproven collegiate player" instead of nabbing a <i>guaranteed stud CB</i>?! If true, that's just frigging retarted[CP spelling].

No shit

If we don't win this year, this team is getting overhauled. It's now or never............

C-Mac 03-03-2005 09:28 AM

At least Rolle and Hartwell are still in town....

Coach 03-03-2005 09:31 AM

I noticed they said pass a physical with Trotter, I wonder if that means they have the contract all worked out and are just waiting on the results of the physical to come back?

keg in kc 03-03-2005 09:31 AM

Another question is why spend a pick in addition to huge money when other stud CBs are on the free agent market without the cost of a draft pick.

And virtually everyone I've heard interviewed the last two days has said that Rolle is our priority, not Surtain. Surtain may be the fallback.

ChiTown 03-03-2005 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc
Another question is why spend a pick in addition to huge money when other stud CBs are on the free agent market without the cost of a draft pick.

And virtually everyone I've heard interviewed the last two days has said that Rolle is our priority, not Surtain. Surtain may be the fallback.


I'm selfish, I want both :)

I agree. Rolle is probably the better fit for the team, and more logical.

Warrior5 03-03-2005 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C-Mac
At least Rolle and Hartwell are still in town....

Man, to dream...

Must...not...get...hopes...up.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.