ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I think the most interesting pick in this draft (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203140)

Coltman 02-26-2009 07:37 AM

I think the most interesting pick in this draft
 
will be what the Chiefs do in round 2. We have the 34 pick (I think). The Chiefs may trade the number 3 for additional picks or take someone at that pick. However, we could get a very good player with our number 2. Any thoughts on who that might be? We need so much help and this year's draft will be Pioli and Haley's first as Chiefs so a lot of pressure to do it right. Any thoughts are appreci:rolleyes:ated.

KCUnited 02-26-2009 07:41 AM

So the Chiefs may trade the number 3 pick for additional picks or they may take someone at that pick? Hmmm.

Consistent1 02-26-2009 07:47 AM

That second pick will be key this year, as they all will be. All the help we can get, huh? There will still be some potential big time players there at that point.

Bill Lundberg 02-26-2009 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 5528577)
So the Chiefs may trade the number 3 pick for additional picks or they may take someone at that pick? Hmmm.

That's a Nick Athan comment if I've ever heard one

Coogs 02-26-2009 09:28 AM

I'm thinking we should go OT in both the first round and second round. Then we could move Albert back to guard where he played in college. :)

tyton75 02-26-2009 09:29 AM

I'm thinking we take an OT in the 2nd round.. just cause we need one and it should be deep in this draft..

Jilly 02-26-2009 09:46 AM

I'm going with my philosophy. You draft the best player, regardless of position.

Coogs 02-26-2009 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jilly (Post 5528782)
I'm going with my philosophy. You draft the best player, regardless of position.

So you would be OK with the double OT selections if that happens to be the best player available when we pick?

Frankie 02-26-2009 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 5528577)
So the Chiefs may trade the number 3 pick for additional picks or they may take someone at that pick? Hmmm.

I think they might also trade the number 3 pick for additional picks or they may take someone at that pick.

Frankie 02-26-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyton75 (Post 5528733)
I'm thinking we take an OT in the 2nd round.. just cause we need one and it should be deep in this draft..

Oher.

Jilly 02-26-2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 5528811)
So you would be OK with the double OT selections if that happens to be the best player available when we pick?

I think when you get to round two, the best player available can be any number of guys and the likelihood of it being an OT is pretty slim, my feeling on it is if you're choosing between a mediocre/better than average LB, because that's what you need or a kick ass OT that you may or may not need...you go with the OT. That's just my opinion, and it could possibly be wrong. But I'd rather have players that have the potential to be great now, rather then waiting 5 years for them to develop and then them not even fitting the O or D that we may be running by then.

eazyb81 02-26-2009 10:02 AM

We're going to load up on defense this year.

I doubt we have many guys on that side of the ball that are the type of guys that Pioli typically looks for.

CaliforniaChief 02-26-2009 10:05 AM

I don't know who we're going to pick, but it's nice to finally have hit a good player in round 2 with Flowers...previous to that our second round history has been abysmal. And yes, that includes Pollard. You don't draft a special-teams stud in the 2nd round.

Coogs 02-26-2009 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jilly (Post 5528849)
I think when you get to round two, the best player available can be any number of guys and the likelihood of it being an OT is pretty slim, my feeling on it is if you're choosing between a mediocre/better than average LB, because that's what you need or a kick ass OT that you may or may not need...you go with the OT. That's just my opinion, and it could possibly be wrong. But I'd rather have players that have the potential to be great now, rather then waiting 5 years for them to develop and then them not even fitting the O or D that we may be running by then.

I was just funning with you! :)

Jilly 02-26-2009 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 5529057)
I was just funning with you! :)

Every now and then I like to come play with the boys in the big boy threads.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.