ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The hated Donks' first pick. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244008)

Frankie 04-15-2011 09:25 PM

The hated Donks' first pick.
 
It looks like it's gonna be between Vonn Miller, Marcel Dareus, or possibly Patrick Peterson. I absolutely hate that they are in this position. Two years ago we were picking third and had to take Tyson Jackson. Can you imagine if the three names above were available to us then? :banghead:

Here's my curiousity:

As Chiefs fans and Donk haters (you cannot be just one), what is the order of your preference for them to pick from those three names? And why?

Titty Meat 04-15-2011 09:27 PM

Patrick Peterson
Marcel Dareus
Vonn Miller

Peterson #1 because corners in the league have less of an impact than a dominate D-tackle or pass rusher.

Frankie 04-15-2011 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 7568812)
Patrick Peterson
Marcel Dareus
Vonn Miller

Peterson #1 because corners in the league have less of an impact than a dominate D-tackle or pass rusher.

That's exactly my order. Vonn Miller looks like the next Derrick Thomas.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-15-2011 10:55 PM

Dareus
Miller
Peterson

DT's bust at the highest rate. Miller is a better fit in a 3-4 than a 4-3, and would get dominated at the POA as a RDE, IMO. Ask the Jets how much shut down corners are worth.

The worst scenario is none of the above, it's if the Broncos take Gabbert.

|Zach| 04-15-2011 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7568970)
Dareus
Miller
Peterson

DT's bust at the highest rate. Miller is a better fit in a 3-4 than a 4-3, and would get dominated at the POA as a RDE, IMO. Ask the Jets how much shut down corners are worth.

The worst scenario is none of the above, it's if the Broncos take Gabbert.

You shit your mouth. If that happens I will blame you and eat my cereal out of the bottom of your skull.

Seriously though, there is no way they go QB. They think they have something in Timmy.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-15-2011 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7568973)
You shit your mouth. If that happens I will blame you and eat my cereal out of the bottom of your skull.

Seriously though, there is no way they go QB. They think they have something in Timmy.

I don't think Elway is sold on him. I think it's a very low chance, but it does exist within the realm of possibility.

Saccopoo 04-15-2011 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7568970)
Dareus
Miller
Peterson

DT's bust at the highest rate. Miller is a better fit in a 3-4 than a 4-3, and would get dominated at the POA as a RDE, IMO. Ask the Jets how much shut down corners are worth.

The worst scenario is none of the above, it's if the Broncos take Gabbert.

Worst case for the Broncos, best case for the Chiefs. Please take Gabbert Donks.

I don't want to see Peterson or Miller in this division. Miller would slaughter our tackles, especially working in tandem with Dumervil, and Peterson on Bowe just means Cassel has no one else to throw to. Dareus was a bit of a one year wonder, but if he puts it all together, he could be an absolute terror at almost any position in any front. He's not Suh, but he's got a lot of the same traits.

Dareus
Peterson
Miller

But they are going to have their choice of a really freaking good player with their pick.

Again, please take Gabbert. I'd much rather have a dysfunctional QB controversy than face a complete stud on the defense.

Titty Meat 04-15-2011 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7568970)
Dareus
Miller
Peterson

DT's bust at the highest rate. Miller is a better fit in a 3-4 than a 4-3, and would get dominated at the POA as a RDE, IMO. Ask the Jets how much shut down corners are worth.

The worst scenario is none of the above, it's if the Broncos take Gabbert.

That'd be the best case if they took Blaine Grbac.

Bewbies 04-15-2011 11:39 PM

I hope whoever they take busts. HARD.

Taking a DT in the top 3 is very, very dangerous....

Frankie 04-16-2011 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7568970)
Miller is a better fit in a 3-4 than a 4-3, and would get dominated at the POA as a RDE, IMO.

Good point. I had forgotten that the Donks are switching to 43.

Frankie 04-16-2011 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7568984)
But they are going to have their choice of a really freaking good player with their pick.

Sadly that's true. It bugs me real bad that we didn't have such choices 2 years ago at 3.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7568984)
Again, please take Gabbert. I'd much rather have a dysfunctional QB controversy than face a complete stud on the defense.

I would jump with joy and dance the Middle Eastern reptile dance until the Chiefs pick, if they did that.

Stanley Nickels 04-16-2011 01:18 AM

a) I hate to be the grammarian here, but IT'S ****ING "DOMINANT". WHY THE **** DO PEOPLE SAY DOMINATE? Dominate is a verb, "to dominate"; dominant is an adjective: "a dominant team".

b) I hope they take Cam Newton. Play him out to be whatever you will, but if Carolina passes on him, I hope they jump on him. Dude will not be shit. Dude won't be a maggot on the shit on Roger Goodell's shoe.

salame 04-16-2011 02:54 AM

they wont be taking von miller

Chiefs=Champions 04-16-2011 03:28 AM

It sucks that they have that choice to make. Hopefully they do something stupid.

My order would be:

Dareus
Miller
Peterson.

acesn8s 04-16-2011 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7568804)
It looks like it's gonna be between Vonn Miller, Marcel Dareus, or possibly Patrick Peterson. I absolutely hate that they are in this position. Two years ago we were picking third and had to take Tyson Jackson. Can you imagine if the three names above were available to us then? :banghead:

Here's my curiousity:

As Chiefs fans and Donk haters (you cannot be just one), what is the order of your preference for them to pick from those three names? And why?

Yeah, we had to have Tyson because Curry and Macklin suck. Its not like there was a Harvin or an Oher in that draft that could improve our pitiful team. Thank God we got Jackson.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.