![]() |
Would you have brought Jamaal back in for a short TD?
If one of our late drives had ended up with a first down inside the five, would you (in Andy Reid's role) have let Jamaal come back in to score Touchdown #6 to tie the all-time NFL record with Ernie Nevers, Dub Jones, and Gale Sayers?
It's first down. You have 40 seconds to make the call and vote on the poll. On a related note, we need a Jamaal Charles prefix for threads. |
yes.
|
Quote:
|
Yes but I also wanted to keep Jamaal in Vs Denver to get the rushing record too. All the escalades.
|
Yes.
It's stupid that he wasn't given a shot at Gale's record. Maybe there's some stupid gentleman's code of honor in the league or something. Like no one wants to break that. |
No. Not worth the injury risk.
|
I like mt dew and pixie sticks.
|
To TIE the record? No.
If he had 6 and we were in a position to give him #7 to take sole ownership... yes. |
Quote:
|
No, don't tempt the injury fates.
|
No, nobody remembers such records, they remember winners. We need Charles healthy if we want any chance to win anything.
|
No... If he goes in for a TD that has no outcome on the win/loss column, then they risk a fluke injury. Jamal IS our offense and the postseason is just three short weeks away.
|
In a heartbeat, if I knew that it was for the record.
|
No. That wouldn't be fair to the men that did the work and he is easily the most important aspect of our offense/team right now. His talent is irreplaceable.
If the score was to help us win the game, sure. To tie a record? Nah. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.