Super Bowl Ring OR Hall of Fame
 

Would you as an NFL player rather:

1) Be a part of a Super Bowl winning team.

or

2) Have a Hall of Fame type career.



There seems to be such an emphasis on how much the NFL is such a TEAM oriented game, but at the same time some NFL players with HOF careers get blasted by the media because of lack of championships.

So, which one is it? What is more important to you?
(as a player, not a fan)

Tony Gonzales

HoF is more exclusive. I'd prefer both, but if I had to pick one I'd go with the Hall of Fame. There is no I in Super Bowl.

If I'm a QB I think I'd rather win a Super Bowl.

Any other position, I'd rather have a HOF career.

My answer as well Rain Man.

There are thousands of Just-Another-Guys walking around with Super Bowl Rings. As a HOF'er you can walk around knowing you are in a very small Elite class.

No but there is some WEed.

I get what you are saying because QB's are unfairly judged...
but You would rather go down in history as Trent Dilfer than Dan Marino?

Charlie Batch has a Super Bowl ring.

If I were the player, I'd rather have the HOF career. As a fan, I'd rather have a team win the Super Bowl than have a player elected to the HOF.

Players routinely sell or pawn SB rings. How many HOF rings do you see on the market?

HOF

HOF means that you got paid generational money.

I don't know...Winning the Super Bowl is the reason to play. I think if you asked Barry Sanders, Jim Kelley or Dan Marino, they might tell you they'd trade their HOF for a Super Bowl win.

But sometimes its not the player's fault they didn't get to the Super Bowl or win it, so I can see both sides of the issue.

You're right. I'd rather have a HOF career no matter what position I played.

Hall of Fame.

Speaking of Dilfer, anybody else tired of him trying to make "Dilfer's dimes" a thing?