![]() |
It’s expensive, but it’s baaaahaaad.
The deadliest fighter jet goes operational.
March 2006 The F22 Raptor air superiority fighter is the meanest airplane in the skies, and now its' coming to a TFR near you. It’s official: The United States Air Force has certified the world’s only "fifth generation" fighter jet as operationally ready. The Lockheed Martin F-22 combines supersonic speed (including supersonic cruise without afterburner) with stealth and advanced targeting, weaponry and defense capabilities to make it hands down the most advanced fighter jet on the planet. With plans to field 183 Raptors in all, the Air Force has already begun to fly operational missions with the jet, including homeland defense missions, so you might see one any day now. It wasn’t a short gestation period for the world’s best air superiority fighter. The need for a jet like the F-22 to replace the F-15 was first officially voiced by the Air Force in the early 1980s. But the first flight of the prototype YF-22 didn’t take place until 1990, while the first supersonic flight wouldn’t occur for another seven years. While much of its performance remains classified, according to some reports, in aerial combat tests against F-15s and other frontline U.S. fighters, the F-22 had a near perfect "kill record" and was never picked up by its foes’ radar during mock combat flights. Such capabilities come at a price, though: The cost of each F-22, by some estimates, is around $125 million. http://www.flyingmag.com/assets/imag...2006141727.jpg Linky. |
|
Only 183 to replace the almost 500 F-15s that were in service at one time. That is worrisome.
|
I had the opportunity to go and visit the F22 production line. One amazing stat was it's fly time was twice the F15 and could cruise at super sonic speeds giving it 3 times the distance without refueling.
|
I've seen them flying over Atlanta before, that's one bad mamba jamma.
|
Quote:
|
Su-35/Su-37. :D
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
They do have great ejection seats, however, which is nice. Weeeee! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In all seriousness the Mig series were pretty sweet, though they were basically just copies of the F series with modifications/improvements. Them Ruskies sure knew how to steal a good design. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
2. Non-stealth versus stealth. Kind hard to fight when you're already dead. 3. American avionics are still FAR superior to Russian. 4. Sure the SUs can do some really cool tricks, but the odds of the SUs surviving long enough for the "Cobra" and other stuff to come into play are very low. The old adage of "he who sees the other guy first and shoots first, wins" is still very applicable to 5G aircraft. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I was purely talking plane vs plane. Nothing more. Imagine equally skilled pilots, ideal weather conditions, etc. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, considering that the F-15Cs that got their asses handed to them recently didn't even detect the Raptors, and the C has one of the best radar systems in the world, forgive me for if I don't believe that the Russians would do any better (or even come close). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I was watching a discovery channel special on these planes a little while ago. They said that the radar on the planes is so advance that they can pick up enemy aircraft, launch their missles and bug out of the area before the enemy ever realizes there might be someone there.
|
Quote:
The days of the close-in dogfight are over. A2A combat isn't a fair fight - it's standoff weaponry nailing targets 25-150miles down range. The SU-35 has superior thrust-vectoring; the rooskies excel in that technology. Problem is with their radar and guidance systems. They are way behind in that regard. Due to that fact, they'd be splashed w/o even knowing where the shots came from. Hell, that holds true for facing Tomcats & the Phoenix AAM... Phoenix is the size of a Volkswagon van; launches at targets at 100+ miles. |
Quote:
Unless the Broncos were involved. |
Quote:
The Raptor has a good, ole Vulcan cannon, just in case. |
Quote:
ALWAYS better to be safe than sorry. If all things were equal, without radar and missiles, just straight-up gunning by line of sight, the SU-35 would be one tough bird to take down. The Russian thrust-vectoring is superior in every way. Their vectoring is a full 360degree vector, whereas the F22 vectors on the Y axis only; and to a lesser angle. |
Only $125 million??????
Gimme two of 'em!!!!!!! Dinny |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not a West Point graduate but unless we're about to take on China in old school fronts combat seems like an expensive toy at this stage in the game.
|
I'll probably lay eyes on a couple on my way home from work here at Langley AFB...home of the first active Raptor squadrons. Ironically, my last assignment was Tydall AFB, where the first training squadron was stood up for the Raptor. The Raptor is following me...
|
Quote:
That's the theory, anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know nothing, never listen(read) me!! Have a wonderfull weekend all, time for me to go and have some fun!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.jsf.mil/program/ Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How ironic will it be if the Warthog is still flying long after the F-16s are long gone? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yep, but the prefered method is to 'buddy lase'.
|
Quote:
|
Here's a 2002 Popular Mechanics article that explains how in the heck the Joint Strike Fighter will be able to handle so many different missions:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=1&c=y |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.