ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Full team Madden ratings are out....... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=145151)

Mecca 08-08-2006 01:39 AM

Full team Madden ratings are out.......
 
Here are the Chiefs..........

http://www.madden-nfl.com/chiefs.php

Just click the link to go to the roster.......of course theres some under and over ration in typical EA fation.

Wa-Z 08-08-2006 01:51 AM

LJ...91?? PFF! :clap: :clap:

Demonpenz 08-08-2006 01:51 AM

they have Edge too low

ZootedGranny 08-08-2006 01:52 AM

Doubt those are the ratings, as we already know that Green is a 91 and LJ is a 95.

Link to leaked ratings: http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6...ingscw8nu0.gif

kcjayhawks5 08-08-2006 01:53 AM

im pretty sure somebody said that ty law is the second highest cornerback

Wa-Z 08-08-2006 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZootedGranny
Doubt those are the ratings, as we already know that Green is a 91 and LJ is a 95.

Link to leaked ratings: http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6...ingscw8nu0.gif

Good Call!

Mecca 08-08-2006 01:59 AM

Better hope they put Ty Law on the Chiefs before the games released or well.......you won't have the cap room for him I bet.

pr_capone 08-08-2006 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZootedGranny
Doubt those are the ratings, as we already know that Green is a 91 and LJ is a 95.

Link to leaked ratings: http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6...ingscw8nu0.gif

Cant really get more to the source than the homepage for the game itself tho... can you?

ZootedGranny 08-08-2006 02:03 AM

That's not the homepage for the game, that's a fansite.

http://www.easports.com/madden07/ is the real site.

Mecca 08-08-2006 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZootedGranny
That's not the homepage for the game, that's a fansite.

http://www.easports.com/madden07/ is the real site.

So you really think someone took all the time to do all that work......for nothing? Not to mention that site is pretty nice looking and well done.

pr_capone 08-08-2006 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZootedGranny
That's not the homepage for the game, that's a fansite.

http://www.easports.com/madden07/ is the real site.

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

<-- dumb azz

ZootedGranny 08-08-2006 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
So you really think someone took all the time to do all that work......for nothing? Not to mention that site is pretty nice looking and well done.

From one of their administrators in their forum:

Quote:

I know I stated it in another post but I just want to again make sure you all realize the ratings posted are NOT the Official ratings but are ratings made by a reliable ratings guru who devotes hours upon hours year after year doing Madden Rosters and has a great reputation in the Madden community for posting very realistic and for the most part almost dead on accurate ratings.

As most of us know, IGN always gets the first crack, at least historically, at the ratings and as soon as those are made public the ratings on this site will be updated to reflect the actual ratings with the roster viewer. (much better than the typical spread sheet format you get) I have been hearing/seeing posts from other sites that these were official so I wanted to clarify that.
http://www.madden-nfl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1044

And true to tradition, IGN is going to be releasing ratings soon.

banyon 08-08-2006 08:26 AM

William Bartee = 82 :shake:

Carlos Hall = Jared Allen :shake:

Kendrell Bell > Derrick Johnson :shake:

Lzen 08-08-2006 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon
William Bartee = 82 :shake:

Carlos Hall = Jared Allen :shake:

Kendrell Bell > Derrick Johnson :shake:

And:

Kyle Turley is too low

Eric Hicks is too high (they seem to rate him too high every year - wtf?)

Junior Siavii is too high

Kawika Mitchell is too low

Wesley and Knight are a little too high

Sapp is too low

Lzen 08-08-2006 09:26 AM

Oh and I almost forgot

Tynes is too low.

BTW banyon, you do realize they they rated Bartee an 82 as a FS, not a CB. Right?

Also of note is that they rated Brodie Croyle's throwing power and accuracy pretty high:
THP - 90
THA - 85
He just needs experience to raise that awareness:
AWR - 67

htismaqe 08-08-2006 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon
William Bartee = 82 :shake:

Carlos Hall = Jared Allen :shake:

Kendrell Bell > Derrick Johnson :shake:

Bell is a former DRoY, Johnson is a 2nd-year player from a shitty defense.

Alot of what goes into Madden ratings is based on past performance, not current performance, athleticism, or potential.

banyon 08-08-2006 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen
Oh and I almost forgot

Tynes is too low.

BTW banyon, you do realize they they rated Bartee an 82 as a FS, not a CB. Right?

Also of note is that they rated Brodie Croyle's throwing power and accuracy pretty high:
THP - 90
THA - 85
He just needs experience to raise that awareness:
AWR - 67

I wouldn't rate Bartee as 82 to lay down the sod on the field.

banyon 08-08-2006 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Bell is a former DRoY, Johnson is a 2nd-year player from a shitty defense.

Alot of what goes into Madden ratings is based on past performance, not current performance, athleticism, or potential.


Surely you meant to apply that logic solely to the Johnson/Bell comparison.

If based on past performance also, then Bartee's career 0 INT's should knock him down a peg or two. Also, Allen had good numbers that should be better than Hall's.

tk13 08-08-2006 02:08 PM

Bartee always has good ratings in Madden because he has all the physical skills, can tackle, and there's only one category for "awareness" to help bring your overall number down.

Lzen 08-08-2006 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13
Bartee always has good ratings in Madden because he has all the physical skills, can tackle, and there's only one category for "awareness" to help bring your overall number down.

In other words, there's no category for neck rotation ability. ;)

htismaqe 08-08-2006 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon
Surely you meant to apply that logic solely to the Johnson/Bell comparison.

If based on past performance also, then Bartee's career 0 INT's should knock him down a peg or two. Also, Allen had good numbers that should be better than Hall's.

I didn't say it was necessarily based on numbers.

It's more like the Pro Bowl. Kendrell Bell has a "name".

BigChiefFan 08-08-2006 03:26 PM

They've got Huard as the THIRD STRINGER-LOL and a overall rating of 65.

Moooo 08-08-2006 04:19 PM

I checked the Saints, and Fuj is rated 83... Still bringing it in moderation.

Moooo


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.