ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Is Ty Law a Bust?? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=150468)

Halfcan 10-23-2006 07:09 AM

Is Ty Law a Bust??
 
He has had a few good plays-Arizona he saved the game-but in Pitt he misplayed the ball and fell down, leading to a TD-after that the game was over. He seems to play too far back and has been burned repeatedly while getting several penalties. The pass interference yesterday directly lead to a TD that could have cost us the game.

So is he worth the pile of cash so far??

NewChief 10-23-2006 07:12 AM

The PI was a BS call.

Archie F. Swin 10-23-2006 07:12 AM

yeah, bring back McLeon

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-23-2006 07:13 AM

The PI call was bullshit, you can't blame him on that one. I don't really recall him getting "several penalties", in fact, Surtain probably has just as many if not more than Law.

We're still only 3/8 of the way into the season....

Halfcan 10-23-2006 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief
The PI was a BS call.

He pushed the guy down?

Halfcan 10-23-2006 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie F. Swin
yeah, bring back McLeon

I still have nightmares over that guy.

Kerberos 10-23-2006 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
He pushed the guy down?




absolutely not.

Dr. Van Halen 10-23-2006 07:17 AM

You can't blame Law for falling down on the slick grass in the Pittsburgh game.

And I'm not sure he's been burned repeatedly, either.

KC Kings 10-23-2006 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
He pushed the guy down?

Hardly, he touched the guy and he fell down but the ball damn near went into the stands and was not catchable in the least bit.

trndobrd 10-23-2006 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
He pushed the guy down?

The receiver tripped on the goal line and the ball didn't even land in the endzone. Illegal contact, maybe. PI, nope.

How many passes have been thrown his way this year? Maybe a couple a game. It would take the careful study of 6 games worth of film, but I would suggest that you haven't seen a lot of Ty Law because he generally covers his receiver. The value of a CB is in the number of passes NOT thrown his direction because his man is covered.

I'm pretty sure whether the CBs line up over the receiver, or off is not their own decision. Take that issue up with Gun.

Halfcan 10-23-2006 07:23 AM

Only two tackles yesterday and Parker smoked him a few times.

With all the hype for two years getting this guy-is is worth it??

Halfcan 10-23-2006 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trndobrd
The receiver tripped on the goal line and the ball didn't even land in the endzone. Illegal contact, maybe. PI, nope.

How many passes have been thrown his way this year? Maybe a couple a game. It would take the careful study of 6 games worth of film, but I would suggest that you haven't seen a lot of Ty Law because he generally covers his receiver. The value of a CB is in the number of passes NOT thrown his direction because his man is covered.

I'm pretty sure whether the CBs line up over the receiver, or off is not their own decision. Take that issue up with Gun.

You could be right about getting burned on the screen passes-Gun might have them playing back.

Halfcan 10-23-2006 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Kings
Hardly, he touched the guy and he fell down but the ball damn near went into the stands and was not catchable in the least bit.

I agree the ball looked uncatchable, but TY did have his hands on him throughout the route.

trndobrd 10-23-2006 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
Only two tackles yesterday and Parker smoked him a few times.

With all the hype for two years getting this guy-is is worth it??


Um...OK. What kind of defense are you recommending where our cornerbacks are putting up big tackling numbers?

Everyone was off at Pittsburg, including Law and his safety help, and Parker is a good receiver.

When you say "worth it", what do you mean? As opposed to what other option? Bartee? McCleon?

trndobrd 10-23-2006 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
You could be right about getting burned on the screen passes-Gun might have them playing back.


Which I disagree with. I think every time a receiver lines up the CB should bust him in the chops at the snap of the ball. But I'm guessing the coaches call the coverage schemes, not each player doing what they feel like on that particular down.

Chiefs_Mike_Topeka 10-23-2006 07:35 AM

I wish the Chiefs would for the most part scrap the cover two and run a more traditional man to man scheme. I am tired of seeing Law release a player to the safeties in the cover 2 zone only to see them make a catch and Law left to stand there looking stupid.

Especially when we play high caliber receivers; such as the Arizona game, Boldin had a field day because of the releases Surtain and Law was giving him.

Eleazar 10-23-2006 07:43 AM

You're an idiot.

penguinz 10-23-2006 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
You and idiot.

Fixed your post.

StcChief 10-23-2006 08:15 AM

eh NO.

jspchief 10-23-2006 08:18 AM

Law's the best CB on the team and the most complete CB we've had in 10 years. He's smart and he's a gamer. Plays tough against the run and pass. Is he on 100% of the time? No, but no CB is this league is.

If there was someone better to spend that money on, name him.

Hootie 10-23-2006 03:44 PM

why did you guys try to debate a thread with halfcan?! The dude knows nothing about football. He has to have an IQ comparable to that of Samie Parker.

the Talking Can 10-23-2006 03:50 PM

I still orgasm just saying his name.

JBucc 10-23-2006 03:51 PM

Quote:

Is Ty Law a bust?
I think you have to wait five years after you retire to get to Canton.

Dave Lane 10-23-2006 03:51 PM

Umm Yes and is he a god? No

Thanks for playing.

Dave

Red Dawg 10-23-2006 04:01 PM

QB's have stayed away from him. Those two sacks yesterday in the fourth were coverage sacks and that is a direct reflection of him. He is not a bust at all.

Reerun_KC 10-23-2006 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBucc
I think you have to wait five years after you retire to get to Canton.


Beat me to it!!!

Mr. Laz 10-23-2006 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
He pushed the guy down?

i don't know what game you were watching but Law barely made contact.... even then it was just "hand-fighting"


the guy tripped over his own feet.



maybe ....... maybe it could of been consider a illegal contract/5 yrds penalty with automatic 1st down.


no way was it a PI ..... the ball wasn't catchable anyway.


yea Law did slip against the steelers ..... the entire secondary played like total crap against the steelers.

isn't Surtain actually being paid more money by us??

i think so ... Law isn't a bust


our linebackers and safeties are a far bigger weaknesss in the passing game.


not to mention that i think our coaching tell them them to stay back and let the guy make the catch and then tackle him.


teams should just be throwing shallow crossing patterns all day


i expect holmgren to dink and dunk the crap outa us

Raiderhater 10-23-2006 04:19 PM

OK boys and girls, this is a perfect example of why you should not do drugs.

Hootie 10-23-2006 04:21 PM

there is no way that was PI...it should've been illegal contact.

Big difference between 5 yards and 30 yards...I was pissed off.

Lzen 10-23-2006 04:29 PM

Halfcan,
you're and idiot.

Direckshun 10-23-2006 07:06 PM

Absolutely not. Ty has been worth it. Our pass defense has been elevated from joke-worthy to fearsome. Ty has been no small part of that.

They don't keep track of coverage sacks, but if they did, our secondary has a bundle so far. Plummer, Rivers, Leinart, and Smith have been hit a few times more than they should because Law's secondary has shut down all passing lanes.

Law himself has intercepted a couple so far, six games into the season. One of them helped defeat the Cards. Very good.

And he plays every down against the opponent's most talented receiver. Against San Diego, it was often one-on-one while everybody else attacked the line, so he had to play very conservatively, and he never once gave up a huge TD. (The LT touchdown was blown coverage on the right flank; Law was on the other side of the field.)

I'd blame him and the entire Chiefs secondary for their pitiful performance against the Steelers, but I'd rather erase that game from my mind.

The only game (other than Pittsburgh) where Law got beat with any consistency was against Denver's Jevon Walker, who's burning everybody right now. Law played him as well as anybody in the league could and Walker still found ways to win.

Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).

petegz28 10-23-2006 07:51 PM

This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.

Deberg_1990 10-23-2006 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28
This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.

I agree...lets just put Warfield and Bartee back in there again...

End of thread..

KcMizzou 10-23-2006 08:05 PM

A bit like asking if Ryan Sims should be a pro-bowler.

Hootie 10-23-2006 08:24 PM

someone should take away halfcan's thread-making privileges...

Valiant 10-23-2006 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
Only two tackles yesterday and Parker smoked him a few times.

With all the hype for two years getting this guy-is is worth it??


Think it is more of the coverage we run..

Hootie 10-23-2006 08:49 PM

halfcan is too friggin' dense to understand a cover 2 defense.

He watches the replay and is like, "holy shit! Law just let that guy run by him after 10 yards!" not realizing that the cover 2 calls for the corner to release the receiver to the safeties after a certain amount of yards.

headsnap 10-23-2006 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun
Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).

Bartee was always a top tackler...





case closed!

Direckshun 10-23-2006 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headsnap
Bartee was always a top tackler...

case closed!

http://content.collegehumor.com/item...9.451xAUTO.jpg

Halfcan 10-23-2006 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28
This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.

Since this place drooled over Ty for two freakin years, we finally get him, Jets trolls jumped all over us saying he is going to suck, and now the D is playing respectable football-I thought it was a valid question.

I think he has done a nice job-wish they would send him on corner blites a few more times this year-he has the technique to really make a big play and get to the QB.

I rewatched a few games-and it seems he has released his guy a few times thinking a safety was there-Now is that Ty's fault or Sammys??

boogblaster 10-23-2006 10:54 PM

Law has slowed some..but his presence makes QBs look-off most of the recievers hes covering..plus hes a plus for our youth on the team..and in the locker-room....

Halfcan 10-23-2006 10:58 PM

Don't forget Ty has been Money in the bank during the Playoffs-now we just have to get there.

Easy 6 10-23-2006 11:01 PM

Are you kidding me??????????? He's an even BIGGER bust than Hali.........

007 10-23-2006 11:02 PM

Law was worth the cash. All CBs eventually get a penalty and/or get burned. Goes with the game. We are better with him than without him. That is the most important stat.

Halfcan 10-23-2006 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun
Absolutely not. Ty has been worth it. Our pass defense has been elevated from joke-worthy to fearsome. Ty has been no small part of that.

They don't keep track of coverage sacks, but if they did, our secondary has a bundle so far. Plummer, Rivers, Leinart, and Smith have been hit a few times more than they should because Law's secondary has shut down all passing lanes.

Law himself has intercepted a couple so far, six games into the season. One of them helped defeat the Cards. Very good.

And he plays every down against the opponent's most talented receiver. Against San Diego, it was often one-on-one while everybody else attacked the line, so he had to play very conservatively, and he never once gave up a huge TD. (The LT touchdown was blown coverage on the right flank; Law was on the other side of the field.)

I'd blame him and the entire Chiefs secondary for their pitiful performance against the Steelers, but I'd rather erase that game from my mind.

The only game (other than Pittsburgh) where Law got beat with any consistency was against Denver's Jevon Walker, who's burning everybody right now. Law played him as well as anybody in the league could and Walker still found ways to win.

Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).


Well said-so why have people bitched about TY since we got him. How many post popped up after the Cincy game that he was playing back too far. How many about falling down and also the Penalty against SD. It is a fair question to ask considering some of the comments around here. Is he worth it??

Halfcan 10-23-2006 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsguru
Law was worth the cash. All CBs eventually get a penalty and/or get burned. Goes with the game. We are better with him than without him. That is the most important stat.

Did you see Shawn Springs get toasted by Harrison-that was sad. :shake:

007 10-23-2006 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
Did you see Shawn Springs get toasted by Harrison-that was sad. :shake:

guess I missed that one.

Direckshun 10-23-2006 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
so why have people bitched about TY since we got him. How many post popped up after the Cincy game that he was playing back too far. How many about falling down and also the Penalty against SD. It is a fair question to ask considering some of the comments around here. Is he worth it??

Why did people bitch about Law after the Cincy game? After the SD penalty?

Because people are fickle twerps whose allegiances and opinions will change on a dime.

They know no true loyalty, but instead impatiently denounce even the tiniest flaws they see as apocalyptic.

Don't listen to these people. You don't jump on a guy for one bad game or one bad play (if Law's Cincy game could even be called bad--I'd make the opposite case).

He's worth it. Not only that, he's extremely worth it. He's the leader of our revamped defense, and the crown jewel in Gunther's cover 2.

Rausch 10-23-2006 11:38 PM

Indeed, Law is clearly a bust.

Why, all you have to do is look at what Surtain and Warfield did the the first 6 games of last season and.......what?....oh...

Imon Yourside 10-23-2006 11:47 PM

Just the name Ty Law makes our defense 100x better, not to mention he ain't too shabby on defense either.

Hootie 10-23-2006 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
Well said-so why have people bitched about TY since we got him. How many post popped up after the Cincy game that he was playing back too far. How many about falling down and also the Penalty against SD. It is a fair question to ask considering some of the comments around here. Is he worth it??

what the **** are you talking about?

People have been all over Surtain...Law has gotten praise from just about everyone.

Rausch 10-24-2006 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
what the **** are you talking about?

People have been all over Surtain...Law has gotten praise from just about everyone.

****ing n00bs.

The important thing isn't who you bitch at, or why, only that you bitch incessantly...

Halfcan 10-29-2006 02:48 PM

Today he drops an INT for a TD then falls down yet again and gets burned for another TD.

BUST!!

Halfcan 10-29-2006 02:49 PM

Today he drops an INT for a TD then falls down yet again and gets burned for another TD.

Tactical Funky 10-29-2006 03:00 PM

He's not a bust, but he needs to stop falling down and pulling a Surtain when a ball is thrown right in his ****ing numbers...

At least Surtain held on to his INT today.

ChiefaRoo 10-29-2006 03:11 PM

He's not a bust. He did have a crappy series today though.

ChiefaRoo 10-29-2006 03:12 PM

Winner, winner, chicken dinner

JBucc 10-29-2006 03:12 PM

He just needs some longer ****ing spikes on his shoes and some extra grippy gloves.

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:17 PM

He didn't cover anyone today. Jeez Ty buy some spikes and quit falling down you dumbass!!

the Talking Can 10-29-2006 03:17 PM

stop falling down you asshole

that play is inexcusable

Frazod 10-29-2006 03:18 PM

YES.:cuss:

dj56dt58 10-29-2006 03:18 PM

He'd be fine if we would play cover 2 like we're supposed to be doing

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:18 PM

At least when Eric Warfield fell down it was stumbling out of his car after getting pulled over-lol

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-29-2006 03:19 PM

He needs to remove his head from his ass. He almost cost us the game today, as did Allen, Colquitt, Black, and Surtain.

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58
He'd be fine if we would play cover 2 like we're supposed to be doing

So the scheme is making him fall down, drop Ints, and getting burned???

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
He needs to remove his head from his ass. He almost cost us the game today, as did Allen, Colquitt, Black, and Surtain.

Exactly, after all the TY Hype for 2 years, I am disapointed in his play so far this year-thats all.

The Bad Guy 10-29-2006 03:21 PM

Why do you have to ****ing whine after a win?Why?Ty Law, sans two plays this year, has been fine.

KcMizzou 10-29-2006 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy
Why do you have to ****ing whine after a win?Why?Ty Law, sans two plays this year, has been fine.

Halfcan, on the other hand, is a bust.

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy
Why do you have to ****ing whine after a win?Why?Ty Law, sans two plays this year, has been fine.

I was slammed for even daring to ask the question, and now after TY drops another INT for a TD, and then gets faked out of his jock on a pump fake by a QB making his first start and then falls down yet again- I thought it was relevant to bring it back.

Mecca 10-29-2006 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
I was slammed for even daring to ask the question, and now after TY drops another INT for a TD, and then gets faked out of his jock on a pump fake by a QB making his first start and then falls down yet again- I thought it was relevant to bring it back.

I think you need to understand how old Ty Law is as to why WR's can get behind him on double moves....

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:30 PM

So he is old-that is why he has sucked this year??

Mecca 10-29-2006 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
So he is old-that is why he has sucked this year??

I wouldn't say he "sucked", but he does have limitations because of his age. He can't sprint 40 yards with alot of WR's anymore, it doesn't help that our safeties are slow and stupid also.

Halfcan 10-29-2006 03:35 PM

Tory Holt is going to embarass him next week the way he has been playing. It is inside so maybe he won't fall down so much.

jspchief 10-29-2006 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
stop falling down you asshole

that play is inexcusable

We're paying him too much to drop INTs and fall down in crucial points in the game.

KChiefs1 10-29-2006 04:05 PM

not a bust

The Bad Guy 10-29-2006 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
Tory Holt is going to embarass him next week the way he has been playing. It is inside so maybe he won't fall down so much.

Torry Holt embarrasses a lot of DBs in the NFL.

I'm tired of this shit. The Chiefs have had worthless CBs for years. We finally have some and you complain?

**** off.

the Talking Can 10-29-2006 04:09 PM

the real problem is our safties


where are they???

they're never deep enough...or smart enough...or fast enough...

mcan 10-29-2006 04:10 PM

Falling down in Pittsburg was because of the field. If you remember, the reciever wasn't really tackled on that play; he also fell down.

Falling down today was because he got beat badly and he was off balance. It happens. But, geez it hurts. Especially when the safety is 30 yards away...


As for him being a bust. Not at all. All you have to do is look at all the close games we've been winning. The coverage sacks. The pressure that the linemen are getting. The number of times that WALLS has been thrown to. Ty Law is playing like a Pro-Bowler, but everybody just looks at the 2 crappy plays. His "holding" today was ticky tack at best. Yes, he had a hold of the jersey, but he didn't effect the reciever at all. The call was not to the spirit of the rule, even though it was correct. The call last week was plainly the WORST call a referee has ever made. Law never even TOUCHED McCardell. McCardell dove towards Law's legs after the ball sailed 20 yards over their heads and hit the ground behind the goalpost, and bounced into some bystanders.

I don't think he should be accountable for those.

Halfcan 12-03-2006 08:01 PM

Ty was embarassed today. I wonder if he picked his jock up off the field.

Mr. Laz 12-03-2006 08:04 PM

bust = no

but we sure aren't getting our money's worth



dam vanilla-assed defense doesn't help


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.