![]() |
The hypothetical Jared Allen/rookies poll
Would you rather have
Jared Allen lining up next to Alfonso Boone, Glenn Dorsey and Tamba Hali OR Our current patchwork DL And Branden Albert, Brad Cottam and DaJuan Morgan? I guess I'll only be satisfied with the trade if Albert turns out to be a stud LT and Cottam is the long-term replacement for Gonzalez. Morgan would be gravy. |
If we hadn't traded Allen, Dorsey wouldn't have fallen to #5 and we would have reached on Ryan Clady. That's just how the universe works.
|
Quote:
I wonder what we would have done if we hadn't traded Allen though. Having the 17th pick gave us the flexibility to go BPA and take Dorsey. If we didn't make the trade we probably would have traded down and taken Clady. |
Quote:
We might have passed on the sonofabitch though for Clady. :cuss: |
Quote:
|
If we don't trade Allen, and Dorsey falls to 5 (I don't see why he wouldn't have...), I don't think we draft him.
Why do I believe that? Because without that 17th pick, we don't have any possibility at all of getting both Dorsey and Albert, and in that situation, I think they ultimately decide to fill the greater need in Albert. So that extra pick, in my opinion, is what got us Dorsey. And I think this is probably a whole different draft top-to-bottom if it goes that way. There was a weird kind of momentum for us. A synchronicity. Things just fell our way, and it started with Dorsey. They (literally) got every player they wanted yesterday (I don't know how many people caught this, but apparently Herm told Jaworski the 3 guys we wanted just before the draft started, and we got every one of them...), and that just doesn't happen if Jared's on this roster. It can't happen, because we don't have the picks... So, personally, I take the draft. I think Dorsey and Albert (and Flowers) are more important to this team than Allen would have been. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I actually enjoy a tasty dish of menstruation. It's great with a little salt and pepper.
And either I'm white and shriveled or black and hung. You can't have it both ways. Pick one. |
these tags are awesome...makes threads so much more fun.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jamaal Charles is exactly what our team needs. Sometimes I think that people just assume that a football team is 22 players plus a kicker, punter, return man, and a long snapper. It's not. You need guys like Charles, and he fills a vital role that is far more important than just a backup. He's going to be our third down back, and he can gash defenses with his speed. I guarantee you that he's got more breakaway speed than maybe any back but Chris Johnson (even if McFadden's 40 was faster). |
I like Charles, but he's not a real physical player, and I think he's going to have to work his ass off on the blocking if they really do plan to use him at all on 3rd down.
'course, that said, LJ doesn't exactly stand people up, either... |
Quote:
So, when was the moment where you flip-flopped from HERM WARFARE president... to Secret Herm Edwards Fan club? Was it the playoff loss to the Colts that won you over? Or was it the 4-12 season? Can you pinpoint the precise moment that made you swoon from left to right? |
Quote:
Dumbfucks |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe because Dick Vermeil coached him? Maybe because Carl Peterson gave him a job in 1989 when no one else would? Or maybe he's just being loyal to friends. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only thing that sucked about that round is that Ellis went before our first pick, Smith right before our second, and Doucet right before our third. But we didn't panic. With that being said, Morgan is still a great player, Charles fills a definitive need and was good value there (Detroit should have taken him @ the top of the round if they wanted a RB), and Cottam has great potential. The reason why I think they passed on Zuttah is that they like what they have with Niswanger and Taylor, and given that we also picked up Albert and Richardson, you can't say that the cupboard is bare. We aren't going to trot out asshats like Svitek, Welbourne, Terry, and Turley this year. The o-line is already immensely more talented, healthier, and younger. |
Quote:
Cody Wallace out of Texas A&M Anthony Collins out of Kansas Tony Hills out of Texas Ray Shuenning out of Orgon State Carl Nicks out of Nebraska Any of those would have been okay with me. |
Quote:
Nicks was banned from his own pro day by his coach. I look at a guy like Anthony Collins or Tony Hills and compare him to Barry Richardson, and I don't really see a difference. In fact, Richardson is more naturally gifted and was had 3 round beyond where you wanted these guys to go. |
For what it's worth, this poll is completely ignorant because it's oblivious to the fact that this is a multi-year rebuild. This line is patchwork *this year*.
|
Quote:
If these three picks don't pan out we traded Allen for nothing. |
The answer depends upon how badly the defensive line degrades. Can Dorsey's presence improve Hali's numbers? Can our new 7th round DE be a presence on the right side?
Since the predicate of this team is that you have to have ball control on the offense, than I don't see how the line is any worse than last year. And I have a great deal of confidence that by year's end it will begin to find a personality. And since even with a better overall defense we weren't going to the SB, I go with the trade. |
and the clock strikes midnight, the whining resumes....
|
I've heard many of the learned brethren say here that it takes a couple of years for d-line to develop with exceptions of course. We have a couple that got their feet wet last year and should be improved. Dorsey is an exception. I fully expect him to be a beast this year. We won't have 1 guy with 15 sacks but I can see Hali with 8-10 and the rest with 3-5 each. I just don't see a huge drop on the d-line. After seeing what we got with JA's draft picks I like the trade now. If the Chiefs had stunk it up draft day I might of felt differently but, as of the day after the draft, I think the prognosis has improved both this fall and long term.
|
If we still had Jared Allen, I feel that we wouldn't have drafted Dorsey even if he fell to us. You would have seen a trade with the Saints because the FO wanted more picks.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
these picks are important beyond the players chosen, these picks gave us the confidence/luxury of drafting for value and not reaching... the only goal is to build a complete team that can compete for a Superbowl...if we do that then the trade was a success regardless of what you think of any individual player.... this kind of score keeping is just latent True Fan anxiety... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
people forget...whoever we sign counts in the trade, because that money would have been locked up in Jared Allen the reality is we got 3 draft picks and 2-3 future FAs.... p.s. welcome to the planet |
Where's the option for having a sick line for one year, then watching JA walk for nothing because we don't want to spend that kind of guaranteed money on him?
|
To some people, if the Chiefs had not traded Allen then Herm and Carl would have used a draft chart compiled by Matt Millen, but rejected at the last minute by Millen because it was too stupid. It makes them feel better about a DL that has Boone as a defensive end.
|
Having Boone as a DE isn't ideal at all, but we can't fix everything all at once.
|
we are rebuilding....JA and his $$$ demands push him out.
|
Quote:
Don't make me go around saying Will Franklin is from Kansas. |
The long term replacement for Tony G is already on the team his name is Michael Allan.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus, Hali will be on the right side of the line--which means that he'll be coming from the blindside of most QBs. It's a lot harder to sack a QB when he sees you coming. Hali's number should definitely improve. |
Quote:
|
Don't expect Boone to start at end that was before they drafted and signed some ends.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.