ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Vote of Confidence. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=191012)

Micjones 09-08-2008 09:47 AM

Vote of Confidence.
 
Quote:

Coach Herm Edwards on the team being better with Huard at the helm.

“I don’t know that,” Edwards said. “We lost the game with Damon playing half the game. We’ve got to score more points. I know that. We’ve got to get more drives going. We had too many three-and-outs early in the game.”


Offensive Coordinator Chan Gaily on the team being better with Huard at the helm.

“Today, we’re a better team with Damon because Brodie is hurt,” offensive coordinator Chan Gailey said. “Before the game, we were a better team with Brodie. That’s why he was the starter. The fact we scored immediately when Damon came in, I don’t think that says anything about the situation. We had made some adjustments, cleaned some things up. We were starting to run the ball better.

“We’ve just got to keep doing that. We’ve got to keep getting better, and we’ll have to do it with Damon as our quarterback.”
Way to rally behind your starter.
Tell me again why either of these two are employed at 1 Arrowhead Drive?

HemiEd 09-08-2008 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 4995005)
Way to rally behind your starter.
Tell me again why either of these two are employed at 1 Arrowhead Drive?

Master motivators at work, geniuses!

Mr. Arrowhead 09-08-2008 09:51 AM

the truth hurts sometimes

Buehler445 09-08-2008 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 4995005)
Way to rally behind your starter.
Tell me again why either of these two are employed at 1 Arrowhead Drive?

Goddamn mother****ing Herm. If you know you have to move the ball, let the offensive coordinator do his job. JFC the game plan did not change one iota from Solari to Chan. That suggests that Herm is the root cause for the reason he fired Solari.

Posted via Mobile Device

The Franchise 09-08-2008 09:55 AM

So what I really want to know is this....

Does our offense look like crap when Brodie is in....because Brodie sucks....or is it because they handcuff him with their playcalling?

Mr. Kotter 09-08-2008 09:55 AM

Anyone who has played football understands their point--or at least why they are saying that.

Nothing at all wrong with that IMHO. It may light a fire or give incentive to Huard to show up and do his best (something I don't think he's done since he signed that fat contract before last season.) Otherwise, we should start looking at Thigpen or someone else to do what Huard seems incapable/unwilling to do.

Mr. Kotter 09-08-2008 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 4995026)
So what I really want to know is this....

Does our offense look like crap when Brodie is in....because Brodie sucks....or is it because they handcuff him with their playcalling?


I think it's more the second, than the first; but if Croyle can't stay healthy...we need to move on. He's got this season to prove himself; if he doesn't, I think he'l be moving on next year.

dj56dt58 09-08-2008 09:57 AM

I dont think Chan took a shot at either qb if you read it right...

Skip Towne 09-08-2008 09:59 AM

It's Herm and his 1955 football. Boot his ass.

Deberg_1990 09-08-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 4995026)
So what I really want to know is this....

Does our offense look like crap when Brodie is in....because Brodie sucks....or is it because they handcuff him with their playcalling?

I think its a little bit of both. They dont trust him to sit in the pocket and read a defense. He took very few deep drops. Honestly he looks more comfortable out of the pocket than in it.

So naturally, the call for more run plays, shorter drops and shorter WR routes to help protect him.

Ironically, the best throw i remember Croyle making yesterday was when he was about to get pounded then released a strike to TG at the last second. That was a great throw.

This is all moot anyways.....Dude is like a glass chandelier out there.

MichaelH 09-08-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 4995026)
So what I really want to know is this....

Does our offense look like crap when Brodie is in....because Brodie sucks....or is it because they handcuff him with their playcalling?


Our offense looked like crap because:
1. the o-line isn't that good
2. Hermie thinks 14 points is Arena League
3. Chan Gailey is being conservative by order of Hermie
4. The Patriots defense is pretty darn good


Did I miss any??

smittysbar 09-08-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 4995041)
I dont think Chan took a shot at either qb if you read it right...

I agree.

The O sucked with both QB's BTW

Frazod 09-08-2008 10:24 AM

For the most part, we were doomed by ghastly, stupid, utterly predictable playcalling. I've heard that one definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If that's true, Herm and Chan are definitely insane. How many times did Larry run up the middle for two yards? Christ. :shake:

Edwards may be a great judge of talent, but he certainly has no clue how to utilize it. As for Gailey, I don't know how much of this crap he's responsible for and how much is Herm's fault. And while there were certain things to be optimistic about yesterday, we basically left the points on the field that would have won the game.

OnTheWarpath15 09-08-2008 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 4995112)
For the most part, we were doomed by ghastly, stupid, utterly predictable playcalling. I've heard that one definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If that's true, Herm and Chan are definitely insane. How many times did Larry run up the middle for two yards? Christ. :shake:

Edwards may be a great judge of talent, but he certainly has no clue how to utilize it. As for Gailey, I don't know how much of this crap he's responsible for and how much is Herm's fault. And while there were certain things to be optimistic about yesterday, we basically left the points on the field that would have won the game.

After seeing the changes in the PS, then reverting back to the same crap gameplans we've watched for 3 years - the answer is obvious.

Yesterday's playcalling was eerily similar to the terrible situational calls Solari made.

The common denominator?

Herm Edwards and Carl Peterson.

Demonpenz 09-08-2008 10:56 AM

I thought the game calling was alright. Lets run the ball, make the game as short as possible, and keep LJ involved. They need to atleast pass more on first downs, but against the pats, on the road we were going to have to play it close to the vest. If nothing else for the moral of the players. People can whine on they want on here, but we suck on paper, and we are going to have to play these games to win. We don't matchup well with teams. The fact is, you may think the playcalling is terrible, but I bet in films they will say we need to block or run better, and not worry about the playcalling.

Chiefnj2 09-08-2008 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 4995026)
So what I really want to know is this....

Does our offense look like crap when Brodie is in....because Brodie sucks....or is it because they handcuff him with their playcalling?

I thought everyone said Croyle could audible at the LOS. Is Croyle calling the same bad plays as Chan/Solari?

Extra Point 09-08-2008 11:23 AM

LJ is going to start to wear latex gloves all day long: his free hand is going only one place....

Buehler445 09-08-2008 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 4995131)
After seeing the changes in the PS, then reverting back to the same crap gameplans we've watched for 3 years - the answer is obvious.

Yesterday's playcalling was eerily similar to the terrible situational calls Solari made.

The common denominator?

Herm Edwards and Carl Peterson.

QFT. The only shit we've work in the last 2 years in the Bears game has dissappeared from the playbook.

I remember one counter play. The playaction? Gone. Bootleg? Gone. Downfield passes? Gone. Well, until Huard went in then they allowed him to do some intermediate passes.

The problem is that not only were the plays predictable, but they were the same ****ing plays that were predictable last year. If we were being predictable with a playaction or a bootleg right into Vrabel, or even LJ trying to get outside every play, you could MAYBE point that at Chan. No it is up the middle and mother****ing worthless ass sack of shit SWINGPASSES that everyone knows are coming.

That is 100% Herm taking the bullshit over. At least Marty would let his coordinators do their jobs. It happened to be Hacket, but he still let him do his thing.

Herm is too much of a ****ing pussy to put his trust into someone to win the damn ballgame. **** that bull****ingshit. Dungy gave up bucball. Herm has to too before he will achieve any success at all.

Posted via Mobile Device

teedubya 09-08-2008 11:40 AM

someone needs to skullfuck Herm with a 2 x 4. This idiot doesn't get it. He didn't get it in NY and he ain't getting it now. Hopefully, Clark is getting it, though.

xbarretx 09-08-2008 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 4995018)
the truth hurts sometimes

F that! if thats how they really felt then why didnt they draft a QB or go out and snag one!?

p.s. dont worry arrowhead, its not directed towards you.. its at herm and chan! :cuss:

Demonpenz 09-08-2008 11:51 AM

I wouldn't expect anything less than crazy people on here, but we were a catch away to tying the pats, a team that was 19-0 last year. We were playing mostly rookies. No changes are going to be made until after next year

jettio 09-08-2008 12:01 PM

The play calling was okay to get to third and manageable.

Yesterday's problems in the first half was that they did not pick up first downs on third and short.

It seemed to me that the pass protection was poor on third down.

I think the Pats defense presents unique challenges with a 3-4 with 3 studs as the down linemen in their 3-4.

I think the Chiefs might hang 20+ on the next several opponents, no matter who is the QB.

I would not be surprised either way.

biggunns 09-08-2008 12:20 PM

I would be excited if they fired Herm and Huard today...... (RIGHT NOW)

blueballs 09-08-2008 12:25 PM

this was a 5th preseason game
they didn't think they could win
just try out the running game with a new line

Micjones 09-08-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueballs (Post 4995489)
this was a 5th preseason game
they didn't think they could win
just try out the running game with a new line

And that's every reason why both Carl and Herm should be pinkslipped.

blueballs 09-08-2008 12:28 PM

It's the will that moves the ball men
not the skill


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.