ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Keep Playing Thigpen (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=192281)

Mr. Laz 09-22-2008 11:37 AM

Keep Playing Thigpen
 
i know i'm one of the few ... but i think we should continue to play Thigpen until Croyle is ready to come back.

listen for sec

Thigpen was a 7th round draft pick out of a division 2 school. The school he played at was in their FIRST year of having a football team.

Dude .... it's perfectly understandable for Thigpen to be overwhelmed and a bit scared. He's playing on an offense with a shaky Oline under a coaching staff that's moronic at best.

what do you expect?

even the best QB's lose their accuracy when they are nervous about the pass rush. Ben Rothlisberger turned to complete crap yesterday when he started getting hit.

Thigpen has showed flashes and he's not fragile ... he can run around and get get killed by our offensive ineptitude.

i know it sucks but at least we are developing a solid backup.

and who knows .... when/if he gets over his nervousness and when/if our new offensive lineman improve, he may just pull it together.

how can you blame any QB when he's playing under Herman Edwards .... our coach is a QB killer. He could work for the Grim Reaper he's killed so many NFL Quarterbacks.

just say "no" to Huard and Inglebert humper Martin is a complete unknown and new to the system



patience people, Thigpen should stay in until Croyle comes back.

blueballs 09-22-2008 11:38 AM

It's about selling tickets this week
I think huard sells better

Bowser 09-22-2008 11:39 AM

Well, what other choice do we have? Huard? Hagans? Dingle Martin?


On kind of a side note, who wants to bet that Huard gets released when Brodie is ready to go again?

007 09-22-2008 11:40 AM

I am not sure Joe Montana could look good behind this line.

dirk digler 09-22-2008 11:40 AM

It doesn't matter who plays QB this week we are going to get smoked by 30 pts

Chief Faithful 09-22-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5044581)
i know i'm one of the few ... but i think we should continue to play Thigpen until Croyle is ready to come back.

listen for sec

Thigpen was a 7th round draft pick out of a division 2 school. The school he played at was in their FIRST year of having a football team.

Dude .... it's perfectly understandable for Thigpen to be overwhelmed and a bit scared. He's playing on an offense with a shaky Oline under a coaching staff that's moronic at best.

what do you expect?

even the best QB's lose their accuracy when they are nervous about the pass rush. Ben Rothlisberger turned to complete crap yesterday when he started getting hit.

Thigpen has showed flashes and he's not fragile ... he can run around and get get killed by our offensive ineptitude.

i know it sucks but at least we are developing a solid backup.

and who knows .... when/if he gets over his nervousness and when/if our new offensive lineman improve, he may just pull it together.

how can you blame any QB when he's playing under Herman Edwards .... our coach is a QB killer. He could work for the Grim Reaper he's killed so many NFL Quarterbacks.

just say "no" to Huard and Inglebert humper Martin is a complete unknown and new to the system



patience people, Thigpen should stay in until Croyle comes back.

You are not alone I'm in full agreement. I am not a Pigpen fan, but he looked much better yesterday in Atlanta than the week before against Oakland.

This is a rebuilding year and now is the time to find out if players like Pigpen can get the job done. I'm expecting big things from this team in a season so then need to know what they have before end of season.

morphius 09-22-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 5044589)
I am not sure Joe Montana could look good behind this line.

Joe would be smart enough to "accidentally" dive into McIntosh legs to injury him, since McIntosh has decided that this is the one year he isn't going to injure himself.

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 5044599)
You are not alone I'm in full agreement. I am not a Pigpen fan, but he looked much better yesterday in Atlanta than the week before against Oakland.

This is a rebuilding year and now is the time to find out if players like Pigpen can get the job done. I'm expecting big things from this team in a season so then need to know what they have before end of season.

Dude he was 1 for 11 for -1 yard and a pick. I could probably accomplish that and have never played quarterback in my life.

nychief 09-22-2008 11:48 AM

we don't really have a choice at this point. Huard sucks too.

nychief 09-22-2008 11:48 AM

INGLE MARTIN - at least he played at Fla... for a little while.

Mr. Laz 09-22-2008 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius (Post 5044601)
Joe would be smart enough to "accidentally" dive into McIntosh legs to injury him, since McIntosh has decided that this is the one year he isn't going to injure himself.

hehe

seriously though ... the right side of our offensive line can't pass block worth shitte

the left side of our offensive line has apparently lost all ability to run block. (yes Brian waters .... i'm looking at you)

WTF :cuss:

triple 09-22-2008 11:53 AM

playing Thigpen is the right move.

ElGringo 09-22-2008 11:54 AM

I am in agreement on this one. I am not a "fan" of Thigpen, but the second half showed some hopes of improvement. I say let him go out there. If we are going to lose the game anyway (which most of the board agrees on), why not see what we have. I think he has calmed down, and my just be a viable backup. I don't think Croyle is really even a decent backup because he is so fragile. If the starter got hurt, you would immediately move to the third string.

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElGringo (Post 5044617)
I am in agreement on this one. I am not a "fan" of Thigpen, but the second half showed some hopes of improvement. I say let him go out there. If we are going to lose the game anyway (which most of the board agrees on), why not see what we have. I think he has calmed down, and my just be a viable backup. I don't think Croyle is really even a decent backup because he is so fragile. If the starter got hurt, you would immediately move to the third string.


I don't know if you all noticed this or not, but when he was showing signs of life it's because the falcons were playing soft coverage.

ElGringo 09-22-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5044618)
I don't know if you all noticed this or not, but when he was showing signs of life it's because the falcons were playing soft coverage.

I did notice, and do agree. But that is still a confidence builder. If you continue to throw incomplete/interceptions, you continue to think that is all you can do, and get into a horrible cycle of fear and suck. Herm doesn't exactly help this cycle of suck with his play calling, but maybe we will see something. If he doesn't show anything in the first half against Denver, then I will be ready to give up on him completely. If he shows something, like I said, maybe a solid backup to a true QBoTF

CoMoChief 09-22-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5044581)
i know i'm one of the few ... but i think we should continue to play Thigpen until Croyle is ready to come back.

listen for sec

Thigpen was a 7th round draft pick out of a division 2 school. The school he played at was in their FIRST year of having a football team.

Dude .... it's perfectly understandable for Thigpen to be overwhelmed and a bit scared. He's playing on an offense with a shaky Oline under a coaching staff that's moronic at best.

what do you expect?

even the best QB's lose their accuracy when they are nervous about the pass rush. Ben Rothlisberger turned to complete crap yesterday when he started getting hit.

Thigpen has showed flashes and he's not fragile ... he can run around and get get killed by our offensive ineptitude.

i know it sucks but at least we are developing a solid backup.

and who knows .... when/if he gets over his nervousness and when/if our new offensive lineman improve, he may just pull it together.

how can you blame any QB when he's playing under Herman Edwards .... our coach is a QB killer. He could work for the Grim Reaper he's killed so many NFL Quarterbacks.

just say "no" to Huard and Inglebert humper Martin is a complete unknown and new to the system



patience people, Thigpen should stay in until Croyle comes back.

Your first part of the post perfectly states why he shouldn't start......at least now that reg season games are underway.

People seem to forget that we went 5-3 under Huard in 2006 and was the prime reason why we went to the playoffs that season.

Huard and a decent run game from Johnson and this offense isn't a terrible as people think. Huard gives them the best chance to win.....gives the young players the best chance to develope.

How are our WR's supposed to develope when Thigpen keeps throwing it to the other team??? He is horribly inaccurate. You think overcoming his nervousness is gonna solve his problems?!?!? ROFL FACT is this is a completely different game than whats he's ever been used to.

You don't ask 7th rd draft picks you picked up off of Waivers list (this is also someone that couldnt beat out a shitty Tavaris Jackson) to start in reg season games, at least not this early when there is still a lot at stake. This goes the same for letting Hagans take direct snaps which is just a stupid idea to begin with and is silly as clown shit. If I was Kirk Morrison for OAK I would have dropped to the turf LMAO when I saw him coming in. There was no use for that play calling and should've shown Clark Hunt that Herm has turned this whole team into a comedy flick.

Is Huard good? No.......is he the best option we have til Croyle gets back.......yes.

Starting Thigpen is like us starting James Killian and see what he has to offer. We didn't draft Killian really thinking he was gonna succeed Trent Green. Thigpen and Killian are projects.....you don't waste reg season games on players like them when they are CLEARLY not ready to do so......especially at the teams most important position, when others are trying to develope as well.

It's the regular season and you have to start your best players......Herm is treating this season (so far) like an extended pre-season.

Bowser 09-22-2008 12:02 PM

We should trade for Trent Green.

Chief Faithful 09-22-2008 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5044604)
Dude he was 1 for 11 for -1 yard and a pick. I could probably accomplish that and have never played quarterback in my life.

Yes, but after the horrible start, which really was a team effort, Pigpen made a game of it for 20 minutes.

Don't mistake me for a Pigpen supporter. On the contrary going into the preseason I felt the biggest mistake by Herm was keeping Huard and Pigpen as the backups to Croyle. I never felt either was worth a roster spot and was actually counter productive when there was other talent available to develop, e.g. Woodson, Martin. I would have been much happier with Culpepper instead of Huard for backup. As a matter of fact I was one of the few on this board that hoped Matt Ryan fell to #5.

But as long as Pigpen is the backup, Croyle is out, and Pigpen continues to improve let him start. Afterall, this is a rebuilding season whether we like it or not.

Brock 09-22-2008 12:06 PM

The Chiefs have no one who's better. So, yeah.

ElGringo 09-22-2008 12:07 PM

The other thing I should mention here is this. If we had a CHANCE IN HELL to come out of this game with a win, I would be all for starting whatever QB would give us that chance. I guess that is one way I would agree with starting Huard, but since I don't believe that chance is there, go with the young guy and see what is there.

Chief Faithful 09-22-2008 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5044624)
Your first part of the post perfectly states why he shouldn't start......at least now that reg season games are underway.

People seem to forget that we went 5-3 under Huard in 2006 and was the prime reason why we went to the playoffs that season.

Huard and a decent run game from Johnson and this offense isn't a terrible as people think. Huard gives them the best chance to win.....gives the young players the best chance to develope.

How are our WR's supposed to develope when Thigpen keeps throwing it to the other team??? He is horribly inaccurate. You think overcoming his nervousness is gonna solve his problems?!?!? ROFL FACT is this is a completely different game than whats he's ever been used to.

You don't ask 7th rd draft picks you picked up off of Waivers list (this is also someone that couldnt beat out a shitty Tavaris Jackson) to start in reg season games, at least not this early when there is still a lot at stake. This goes the same for letting Hagans take direct snaps which is just a stupid idea to begin with and is silly as clown shit. If I was Kirk Morrison for OAK I would have dropped to the turf LMAO when I saw him coming in. There was no use for that play calling and should've shown Clark Hunt that Herm has turned this whole team into a comedy flick.

Is Huard good? No.......is he the best option we have til Croyle gets back.......yes.

Starting Thigpen is like us starting James Killian and see what he has to offer. We didn't draft Killian really thinking he was gonna succeed Trent Green. Thigpen and Killian are projects.....you don't waste reg season games on players like them when they are CLEARLY not ready to do so......especially at the teams most important position, when others are trying to develope as well.

Starting Huard helps zero towards the future. I would rather see Martin play than Huard. It makes no sense to me why Huard is even on the roster.

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElGringo (Post 5044623)
I did notice, and do agree. But that is still a confidence builder. If you continue to throw incomplete/interceptions, you continue to think that is all you can do, and get into a horrible cycle of fear and suck. Herm doesn't exactly help this cycle of suck with his play calling, but maybe we will see something. If he doesn't show anything in the first half against Denver, then I will be ready to give up on him completely. If he shows something, like I said, maybe a solid backup to a true QBoTF

Okay understood. But you need to understand this: This is now different then the TD drive against Oakland. They played soft, he scored and that's probably what got him the start against Atlanta. His success is only translating against soft coverage designed to prevent us from scoring too quickly.

CosmicPal 09-22-2008 12:08 PM

Don't mean to be the party-pooper here, but face it- the season is OVER!

There's not enough talent, and sure as hell no fuggen coaching on this team to get this team into any kind of playoff hunt. So, playing Huard to win is dumb. The way the Donks are playing, they'll take the division, and San Diego will most certainly bounce back. They've lost two games on the last couple of plays.

Play Thiggy until Croyle comes back. Huard doesn't want to play any more, and I can't say I don't blame the guy. I don't blame anyone who doesn't want to get over center for the Chiefs right now.

Cash in your chips and let the season slide. In the off-season, we pick up a couple of solid free-agent Offensive lineman, get a new HC, a new GM, and we start anew with the draft.

CoMoChief 09-22-2008 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElGringo (Post 5044634)
The other thing I should mention here is this. If we had a CHANCE IN HELL to come out of this game with a win, I would be all for starting whatever QB would give us that chance. I guess that is one way I would agree with starting Huard, but since I don't believe that chance is there, go with the young guy and see what is there.

IT'S THE ATL FALCONS!!!!!!........starting Huard would have given us a good chance to win.

nychief 09-22-2008 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5044641)
IT'S THE ATL FALCONS!!!!!!........starting Huard would have given us a good chance to win.

you think huard would have dropped 40+ on the birds?

CoMoChief 09-22-2008 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 5044637)
Starting Huard helps zero towards the future. I would rather see Martin play than Huard. It makes no sense to me why Huard is even on the roster.

You really think Martin/Thigpen/or Hagans is gonna have anything to do with this teams future? IF you do you're reeruned. If Croyle doesn't work out.....we aren't gonna risk seeing what Thigpen can or can't do.....we will go after a QB in the draft, trade for Quinn, or look in FA etc.

There are other young players that are hurting because Thigpen is starting.

There's NO chance of this team getting "BETTER" with him starting.

I know Huard isn't the future....but that doesn't mean just say **** it and start our #3 QB JUST BECAUSE HE's YOUNG and clearly isn't ready.

teedubya 09-22-2008 12:11 PM

Yes! we may lose all 16 games, but then... Herm and Carl will be fired!!! finally!!!!

CoMoChief 09-22-2008 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 5044644)
you think huard would have dropped 40+ on the birds?

I can't say that....but I do think there is a good chance the whole outcome of the game would have been different. We would have scored more than we did.......run defense fell apart terribly.....thats something you can't really predict.

Throwing 3 picks in the first half sure as shit doens't help the defense....and certainly isn't something Huard would have done.

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 12:17 PM

just out of curiosity what is the nfl record for consecutive losses?

morphius 09-22-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5044664)
just out of curiosity what is the nfl record for consecutive losses?

26, is the first number I found, late 70's Buc's.

morphius 09-22-2008 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5044653)
I can't say that....but I do think there is a good chance the whole outcome of the game would have been different. We would have scored more than we did.......run defense fell apart terribly.....thats something you can't really predict.

Throwing 3 picks in the first half sure as shit doens't help the defense....and certainly isn't something Huard would have done.

Yup, because Huard was moving the ball great against the Raiders before he got injured...

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius (Post 5044669)
26, is the first number I found, late 70's Buc's.


I thought the dolphins were the only team who had a chance to go 16-0?

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius (Post 5044673)
Yup, because Huard was moving the ball great against the Raiders before he got injured...

at least he completed a couple to his team mates

HemiEd 09-22-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5044581)
i know i'm one of the few ... but i think we should continue to play Thigpen until Croyle is ready to come back.

listen for sec

Thigpen was a 7th round draft pick out of a division 2 school. The school he played at was in their FIRST year of having a football team.

Dude .... it's perfectly understandable for Thigpen to be overwhelmed and a bit scared. He's playing on an offense with a shaky Oline under a coaching staff that's moronic at best.

what do you expect?

even the best QB's lose their accuracy when they are nervous about the pass rush. Ben Rothlisberger turned to complete crap yesterday when he started getting hit.

Thigpen has showed flashes and he's not fragile ... he can run around and get get killed by our offensive ineptitude.

i know it sucks but at least we are developing a solid backup.

and who knows .... when/if he gets over his nervousness and when/if our new offensive lineman improve, he may just pull it together.

how can you blame any QB when he's playing under Herman Edwards .... our coach is a QB killer. He could work for the Grim Reaper he's killed so many NFL Quarterbacks.

just say "no" to Huard and Inglebert humper Martin is a complete unknown and new to the system



patience people, Thigpen should stay in until Croyle comes back.

I agree with you a 100% on this, the last thing I want to see now is Huard. I don't even want to see a shot of him setting on the bench. I don't want another recycle QB brought in either. If you have a plan, which they say they do, they need to stick with it. Play the youngsters, I actually think Thigpen has a chance to grow into the position.

morphius 09-22-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5044677)
at least he completed a couple to his team mates

before sending it right into the other teams hands... Yipee!!!

BigRock 09-22-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5044653)
Throwing 3 picks in the first half sure as shit doens't help the defense....and certainly isn't something Huard would have done.

Of Huard's 16 pass attempts this season, 2 have been picked off. And it's not like they were catchable balls that receivers tipped or something, they were brutally bad bonehead throws.

That's a ratio of one INT every eight pass attempts. Thigpen's ratio is around 17.25 pass attempts per INT.

You're right that Huard wouldn't have thrown 3 INTs like Thigpen did. Based on those numbers, he would have thrown 6 of 'em.

crazycoffey 09-22-2008 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueballs (Post 5044585)
It's about selling tickets this week
I think huard sells better

I bet Chan coaxes Slash out of retirement, that'll sell some tickets [/tongue in cheek]

morphius 09-22-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5044675)
I thought the dolphins were the only team who had a chance to go 16-0?

Well, that is a different question...

As of the 2008 season, there have been eight teams to finish the season 1-15:

1) 1980 New Orleans Saints
2) 1989 Dallas Cowboys
3) 1990 New England Patriots
4) 1991 Indianapolis Colts
5) 1996 New York Jets
6) 2000 San Diego Chargers
7) 2001 Carolina Panthers
8) 2007 Miami Dolphins

morphius 09-22-2008 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5044690)
Of Huard's 16 pass attempts this season, 2 have been picked off. And it's not like they were catchable balls that receivers tipped or something, they were brutally bad bonehead throws.

That's a ratio of one INT every eight pass attempts. Thigpen's ratio is around 17.25 pass attempts per INT.

You're right that Huard wouldn't have thrown 3 INTs like Thigpen did. Based on those numbers, he would have thrown 6 of 'em.

ROFL

triple 09-22-2008 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 5044637)
Starting Huard helps zero towards the future. I would rather see Martin play than Huard. It makes no sense to me why Huard is even on the roster.

I agree 100%

i hope when croyle is healthy they just release Huard

triple 09-22-2008 12:36 PM

there you have it, the Colts only won a single game in 1991, and they won a super bowl just 15 short years later.

there is hope, all hail Carl O. Finleyson

CoMoChief 09-22-2008 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius (Post 5044673)
Yup, because Huard was moving the ball great against the Raiders before he got injured...

Yeah we looked great in those first 7 possessions we had yesterday. :rolleyes:

Chief Faithful 09-22-2008 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5044648)
You really think Martin/Thigpen/or Hagans is gonna have anything to do with this teams future?

I doubt it, but I don't know and neither do you. From what I saw yesterday Pigpen might eventhough I still don't like him.

chagrin 09-22-2008 01:32 PM

14-of-36 for 128 yards 1 TD and 3 INT's not too bad for a nobody but he ain't taking KC anywhere but directly to the #1 pick in April.

As long as you're saying just play him with the hopes he develops into a usable backup, since we're obviously not going anywhere in 2008, then I agree; anything else is silly talk, heh.

StcChief 09-22-2008 01:40 PM

all I know... the animals at the STL Zoo were awesome on a beautiful indian summer day... F sitting watching those loser teams play.

highlights/lowlights are good enough at this point. Actually ran into another Chiefs fan there...
we laughed and cut up about the whold thing.

svuba 09-22-2008 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5044624)
Your first part of the post perfectly states why he shouldn't start......at least now that reg season games are underway.

People seem to forget that we went 5-3 under Huard in 2006 and was the prime reason why we went to the playoffs that season.

and got smoked!

Huard and a decent run game from Johnson and this offense isn't a terrible as people think. Huard gives them the best chance to win.....gives the young players the best chance to develope.

Johnson looked better yesterday, but when the game is on the line, and the other team is actually trying ...not so good...

How are our WR's supposed to develope when Thigpen keeps throwing it to the other team??? He is horribly inaccurate. You think overcoming his nervousness is gonna solve his problems?!?!? ROFL FACT is this is a completely different game than whats he's ever been used to.



You don't ask 7th rd draft picks you picked up off of Waivers list (this is also someone that couldnt beat out a shitty Tavaris Jackson) to start in reg season games, at least not this early when there is still a lot at stake......

There is nothing at stake here stop kidding yourself. This team would not be competitive this year with Romo, or Brady, or Montana, Or the predator at QB.

Is Huard good? No.......is he the best option we have til Croyle gets back.......yes.

Starting Thigpen is like us starting James Killian and see what he has to offer. We didn't draft Killian really thinking he was gonna succeed Trent Green. Thigpen and Killian are projects.....you don't waste reg season games on players like them when they are CLEARLY not ready to do so......especially at the teams most important position, when others are trying to develope as well.

It's the regular season and you have to start your best players......Herm is treating this season (so far) like an extended pre-season.


Reality check here folks,...We are not going to the playoffs....Huard is too old to be QBOTF.....Let Thigpen start

CoMoChief 09-22-2008 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svuba (Post 5044951)
Reality check here folks,...We are not going to the playoffs....Huard is too old to be QBOTF.....Let Thigpen start

Im not saying we will......now it's to the point where we just need to worry about helping other players develope, which Huard gives the other players the best chance to do that.....not Tyler ****ing 7th rd waiver Thigpen.

Katie 09-22-2008 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StcChief (Post 5044855)
all I know... the animals at the STL Zoo were awesome on a beautiful indian summer day... F sitting watching those loser teams play.

highlights/lowlights are good enough at this point. Actually ran into another Chiefs fan there...
we laughed and cut up about the whold thing.

Sad,,, just sad...

patteeu 09-22-2008 04:28 PM

I feel sorry for Huard who, up until last year, had to play behind better QBs and now that he's the best QB on the team, he's too old to be relevant. But I agree that Thigpen should play until Croyle returns unless Herm is faced with a revolt from the team.

Sure-Oz 09-22-2008 04:29 PM

Why oh Why did croyle have to get ****ing hurt, trade for Sage Rosenfels

Iowanian 09-22-2008 04:34 PM

NO.


Playing a QB who sucks will reerun the development of the rest of the team.

This, is my only problem with playing him over Huard.

Even if Huard could muster 4-5 more first downs per game than Thigpen, thats 12-15 more offensive snaps per game of experience and small successful play potential for the REST of the young players, and that many less minutes on the field for the D(who also needs plenty of reps...but not this way)

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-22-2008 04:34 PM

We need to sign this guy:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZaxOX0TdQuY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZaxOX0TdQuY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Iowanian 09-22-2008 04:38 PM

I can't say enough times that the hypocricy is what pisses me off.

Herm is playing Thigpen because he can't get better without the snaps....Fine.

McIngash and herm's son at RG are aweful....At least the young guys have a CHANCE at getting better with plays. They surely wouldn't get the QB ko'd too many more times, and couldn't be any worse in Run blocking.

Hell, at least let them take half the snaps, or play the 2nd half after its out of reach anyway.

Micjones 09-22-2008 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 5045292)
NO.


Playing a QB who sucks will reerun the development of the rest of the team.

This, is my only problem with playing him over Huard.

Even if Huard could muster 4-5 more first downs per game than Thigpen, thats 12-15 more offensive snaps per game of experience and small successful play potential for the REST of the young players, and that many less minutes on the field for the D(who also needs plenty of reps...but not this way)

You mean there are other players on this football team that need development?

You're saying that six consecutive drives that lead to zero offensive productivity isn't conducive to that development?

Unbelievable.

KChiefs1 09-22-2008 05:18 PM

I say play Thigpen til Croyle gets back & then put him in again once Croyle gets injured again....if you are going to be a loser than be the best the NFL has ever seen!

KCCHIEFS27 09-22-2008 05:20 PM

So why did we sign Ingle Martin? To scare Thigpen into playing better? Martin is an unknown,but so is Thigpen. How are we supposed to know what we have if we don't try everybody? Haha..build confidence..did anybody notice the end of the Raiders game when Thigpen had some alright throws, one for a TD to TG and then comes out against the Falcons and sucks it up? It doesn't matter..we are all idiots for caring which 4th string QB we play..

Micjones 09-22-2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCCHIEFS27 (Post 5045403)
So why did we sign Ingle Martin? To scare Thigpen into playing better? Martin is an unknown,but so is Thigpen. How are we supposed to know what we have if we don't try everybody? Haha..build confidence..did anybody notice the end of the Raiders game when Thigpen had some alright throws, one for a TD to TG and then comes out against the Falcons and sucks it up? It doesn't matter..we are all idiots for caring which 4th string QB we play..

Herm has shown time and again that he's completely lost on how to fix what ails this team. His offensive tampering, alone, is enough for me to show him the door.

the Talking Can 09-22-2008 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5044581)
i know i'm one of the few ... but i think we should continue to play Thigpen until Croyle is ready to come back.

listen for sec

Thigpen was a 7th round draft pick out of a division 2 school. The school he played at was in their FIRST year of having a football team.

Dude .... it's perfectly understandable for Thigpen to be overwhelmed and a bit scared. He's playing on an offense with a shaky Oline under a coaching staff that's moronic at best.

what do you expect?

even the best QB's lose their accuracy when they are nervous about the pass rush. Ben Rothlisberger turned to complete crap yesterday when he started getting hit.

Thigpen has showed flashes and he's not fragile ... he can run around and get get killed by our offensive ineptitude.

i know it sucks but at least we are developing a solid backup.

and who knows .... when/if he gets over his nervousness and when/if our new offensive lineman improve, he may just pull it together.

how can you blame any QB when he's playing under Herman Edwards .... our coach is a QB killer. He could work for the Grim Reaper he's killed so many NFL Quarterbacks.

just say "no" to Huard and Inglebert humper Martin is a complete unknown and new to the system



patience people, Thigpen should stay in until Croyle comes back.

totally agree

thigpen has the capacity to improve, huard doesn't...end of story

huard is an old quitter that no one on this team wants to play....he won't be here next year....


but chiefs fans have spent a solid week crying that the fate of our franchise depends on a career backup and quitter named huard....

embarrassing

i thought hootie's bleeding for huard was the most embarrassing thing ever, but we're getting close again....

never has such a shitty, old, quitting, backup earned the love of fans....it does not speak well of us....but perfectly explains why we have embraced Carl's 15 years mediocrity...

Reaper16 09-22-2008 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5044581)

Thigpen was a 7th round draft pick out of a division 2 school.

Coastal Carolina is an FCS (1-AA) school, not Division II.

HemiEd 09-22-2008 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5045407)
Herm has shown time and again that he's completely lost on how to fix what ails this team. His offensive tampering, alone, is enough for me to show him the door.

Your best post I have ever read.

ShortRoundChief 09-22-2008 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5045436)
Coastal Carolina is an FCS (1-AA) school, not Division II.

Personally I don't care if Thigpen went to frigging georgia, he needs to gtfa.

Reaper16 09-22-2008 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5045443)
Personally I don't care if Thigpen went to frigging georgia, he needs to gtfa.

LMAO

chiefs1111 09-22-2008 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 5044608)
INGLE MARTIN - at least he played at Fla... for a little while.

Yeah and he was awful when he played here for the Gators,he couldn't even beat out Chris Leak

Mr. Laz 10-26-2008 12:36 PM

hire me as head coach!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.