ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals Royals Hire New Position Coaches (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=194074)

phisherman 10-13-2008 10:44 AM

Royals Hire New Position Coaches
 
Royals hire Seitzer, Gibbons as coaches
By BOB DUTTON
The Kansas City Star

The Royals filled out their on-field staff Monday morning by hiring former Toronto manager John Gibbons as their bench coach and returning Kevin Seitzer to the organization as hitting coach.

The two hirings complete manager Trey Hillman’s 2009 staff. Pitching coach Bob McClure, first-base coach Rusty Kuntz, bullpen coach John Mizerock and Owen are returning to the staff.

“I’m very pleased with the amount of energy and overall baseball experience we’ve been able to add to our Major League staff with John Gibbons and Kevin Seitzer,” general manager Dayton Moore said. “John’s recent American League experience as the manager of the Toronto Blue Jays will be a tremendous asset to Trey and the rest of the coaching staff.

“I’m also excited to bring Kevin into our organization. He was an exciting player and fan favorite during his days as a Royal, and possesses the same amount of passion and energy as a coach.”

Gibbons, 46, served 4˝ years as the Blue Jays manager before his firing last June 20. He led the club to a 305-305 record in that time. Former bench coach Dave Owen will become the third-base coach on the reconstituted staff.

Seitzer, 46, spent the first six seasons of his 12-year playing career with the Royals. He batted .323 as a rookie in 1987 and finished second in balloting for American League Rookie of the Year.

Seitzer spent part of the 2007 season as the hitting coach at Arizona. He and former Royals teammate Mike Macfarlane operate a baseball-training facility in the Kansas City area.

The Royals also announced former third-base coach Luis Silverio would remain in the organization in the player-development department. His primary job will be to help young Latin players in their transition to professional baseball.

Silverio, 51, recently completed his 33rd year with the Royals. He spent the last six seasons as a coach on the big-league staff,

“I’m delighted that Luis has chosen to remain with our organization and serve in this newly-created position,” Moore said. “He will work with all of our young players as they come through the system, with an emphasis on communicating with the younger Latin kids as their skills develop and begin their professional careers.

“Luis has a terrific working knowledge of our organization and his ability to communicate our values to them will only make the player more comfortable as they grow within our system.”

http://www.kansascity.com/news/break...ry/838773.html

Man, Seitzer could be a great hitting coach!

Stewie 10-13-2008 10:46 AM

I like Seitzer but he bombed as hitting coach in Arizona. Well, he was the scapegoat anyway.

TheCloser 10-13-2008 10:46 AM

Seitzer is one hell of a hitting coach, that is exciting news.

BigChiefFan 10-13-2008 10:47 AM

Damn, Hillman is really improving the coaching staff on the team. Great job. It's pretty wild to think the Royals are stealing the headlines going into week 6 in the NFL.

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 10:47 AM

These are nice additions. Seitzer, in particular, is supposed to know his stuff.

Demonpenz 10-13-2008 10:48 AM

plus he can come on the field to blow a bunt foul

StcChief 10-13-2008 10:50 AM

If they can't start paying players then change may happen.

TheCloser 10-13-2008 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phisherman (Post 5111264)
Seitzer, 46, spent the first six seasons of his 12-year playing career with the Royals. He batted .323 as a rookie in 1987 and finished second in balloting for American League Rookie of the Year.

This is still bullshit in my biased opinion, 207 hits, 33 doubles, 8 triples, 15 home runs and an OBP at .400 and McGwire wins because of 49 home runs.

eazyb81 10-13-2008 11:00 AM

There were better options than Seitzer, hopefully DM didn't just bring him back because of the old Royals connection. I was hoping for Jack Maloof.

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5111310)
There were better options than Seitzer, hopefully DM didn't just bring him back because of the old Royals connection. I was hoping for Jack Maloof.

Jack Meoff? No thanks.

CoMoChief 10-13-2008 11:05 AM

We go through positional coaches like a hot knife through butter.....Jesus.

at some point the players have to be held accountable.

Mr. Laz 10-13-2008 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StcChief (Post 5111289)
If they can't start paying players then change may happen.

uh?

CarolinaChiefz 10-13-2008 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5111323)
We go through positional coaches like a hot knife through butter.....Jesus.

at some point the players have to be held accountable.


Yes, but that would require spending real money. Not two-first-round-picks money. REAL money. Free agent & internal player retention money (see Beltran, Dye, and hopefully Greinke, with different results).

The kind of money that, despite Jackson county ponying up $250M (more ?) in a recession, the Glass family has yet to commit to the product on the field.

Apparently, in a recent questionnaire about improving fans' experience at the K, several options were listed. Noticeably absent? Better players/better team. Reason? It's cheaper to buy another hot dog stand, miniaturized field for 4-year-olds, or set of toilets than it is a power-hitting corner outfielder, another frontline starter, or anyone else who isn't Mark Teahen, Ross Gload or ....gulp....TPJ.

This is Missouri. SHOW ME.

KCUnited 10-13-2008 11:22 AM

We still got action.

Deberg_1990 10-13-2008 11:23 AM

Do position coaches in baseball really make all that much a difference??

How about some better talent??

triple 10-13-2008 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111349)
Yes, but that would require spending real money. Not two-first-round-picks money. REAL money. Free agent & internal player retention money (see Beltran, Dye, and hopefully Greinke, with different results).

The kind of money that, despite Jackson county ponying up $250M (more ?) in a recession, the Glass family has yet to commit to the product on the field.

Apparently, in a recent questionnaire about improving fans' experience at the K, several options were listed. Noticeably absent? Better players/better team. Reason? It's cheaper to buy another hot dog stand, miniaturized field for 4-year-olds, or set of toilets than it is a power-hitting corner outfielder, another frontline starter, or anyone else who isn't Mark Teahen, Ross Gload or ....gulp....TPJ.

This is Missouri. SHOW ME.

kill yourself

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111349)
Yes, but that would require spending real money. Not two-first-round-picks money. REAL money. Free agent & internal player retention money (see Beltran, Dye, and hopefully Greinke, with different results).

The kind of money that, despite Jackson county ponying up $250M (more ?) in a recession, the Glass family has yet to commit to the product on the field.

Apparently, in a recent questionnaire about improving fans' experience at the K, several options were listed. Noticeably absent? Better players/better team. Reason? It's cheaper to buy another hot dog stand, miniaturized field for 4-year-olds, or set of toilets than it is a power-hitting corner outfielder, another frontline starter, or anyone else who isn't Mark Teahen, Ross Gload or ....gulp....TPJ.

This is Missouri. SHOW ME.

There's no one on this board who has been more critical of the Glass family than me. That said, they spent real money in the draft--more than any other team if I'm remembering correctly--and they've been active in the off-season the last two years.

Let's see what happens this winter. This past draft gave me reason to be hopeful, and, as others well know, I was highly critical leading into it.

eazyb81 10-13-2008 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111349)
Yes, but that would require spending real money. Not two-first-round-picks money. REAL money. Free agent & internal player retention money (see Beltran, Dye, and hopefully Greinke, with different results).

The kind of money that, despite Jackson county ponying up $250M (more ?) in a recession, the Glass family has yet to commit to the product on the field.

Apparently, in a recent questionnaire about improving fans' experience at the K, several options were listed. Noticeably absent? Better players/better team. Reason? It's cheaper to buy another hot dog stand, miniaturized field for 4-year-olds, or set of toilets than it is a power-hitting corner outfielder, another frontline starter, or anyone else who isn't Mark Teahen, Ross Gload or ....gulp....TPJ.

This is Missouri. SHOW ME.

We spent more on this past year's draft than any other team in baseball.

RJ 10-13-2008 11:34 AM

John Gibbons, huh? Wonder how long it takes him to get in a fight with one of the players.

SAUTO 10-13-2008 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJ (Post 5111408)
John Gibbons, huh? Wonder how long it takes him to get in a fight with one of the players.

maybe HE can straighten out guillen....

eazyb81 10-13-2008 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJ (Post 5111408)
John Gibbons, huh? Wonder how long it takes him to get in a fight with one of the players.

I'm going with Jose Guillen sometime in early/mid April.

CarolinaChiefz 10-13-2008 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5111384)
We spent more on this past year's draft than any other team in baseball.

Right....and how many years has David Glass been in charge?

Look, I'm glad he opened his checkbook for the draft. It's a step in the right direction. But this franchise has been SO poorly run for soooo long (and again...he's been running it, no?) that it's going to take more than a draft to get this team back to where it could/should be, especially in light of the commitment the community has made to it.

You can boil down what I'm saying to this: the Glass family has yet to be reciprocal in its spending on this franchise to what the community has been towards it. One draft...the kind they should have been having ALL ALONG (if you aren't going to spend in the FA market, you freakin' well better spend in scouting development; the R's did NEITHER) is what it is:

One step in the right direction. About 50 more are needed.

SHOW. ME.

SAUTO 10-13-2008 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111431)
Right....and how many years has David Glass been in charge?

Look, I'm glad he opened his checkbook for the draft. It's a step in the right direction. But this franchise has been SO poorly run for soooo long (and again...he's been running it, no?) that it's going to take more than a draft to get this team back to where it could/should be, especially in light of the commitment the community has made to it.

You can boil down what I'm saying to this: the Glass family has yet to be reciprocal in its spending on this franchise to what the community has been towards it. One draft...the kind they should have been having ALL ALONG (if you aren't going to spend in the FA market, you freakin' well better spend in scouting development; the R's did NEITHER) is what it is:

One step in the right direction. About 50 more are needed.

KILL. ME.

FYP

Rausch 10-13-2008 11:43 AM

Gonzo doesn't need any help but I'm wondering about our O line and QB. We could...wait...this ISN'T the Chiefs thread?

My bad.

What's the difference?...

triple 10-13-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111431)
Right....and how many years has David Glass been in charge?

Look, I'm glad he opened his checkbook for the draft. It's a step in the right direction. But this franchise has been SO poorly run for soooo long (and again...he's been running it, no?) that it's going to take more than a draft to get this team back to where it could/should be, especially in light of the commitment the community has made to it.

You can boil down what I'm saying to this: the Glass family has yet to be reciprocal in its spending on this franchise to what the community has been towards it. One draft...the kind they should have been having ALL ALONG (if you aren't going to spend in the FA market, you freakin' well better spend in scouting development; the R's did NEITHER) is what it is:

One step in the right direction. About 50 more are needed.

SHOW. ME.

most of the people who know little about baseball to say things like this don't come out anyway. but it's good to know the fairweather fans are still restless

CarolinaChiefz 10-13-2008 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5111445)
most of the people who know little about baseball to say things like this don't come out anyway. but it's good to know the fairweather fans are still restless

First off, there's no such thing as a "fair weather" Royals fan. When you haven't won anything in 23 years, and you still have the energy to even care, that's the very definition of not being "fair weather".

If you'd like to compare baseball knowledge, that's another topic. But the simple fact is, this team has been not just bad, but historically bad for most of the past 10 years, and the owner finally doing what he should have been doing all along for ONE year doesn't mask this fact.

Do you work for the Royals? There seems to be an elevated sense of hostility in even discussing this...especially about a franchise that's been less successful the past 20 years than the LA Clippers, the previous benchmark for pro sports futility.

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111499)
First off, there's no such thing as a "fair weather" Royals fan. When you haven't won anything in 23 years, and you still have the energy to even care, that's the very definition of not being "fair weather".

If you'd like to compare baseball knowledge, that's another topic. But the simple fact is, this team has been not just bad, but historically bad for most of the past 10 years, and the owner finally doing what he should have been doing all along for ONE year doesn't mask this fact.

Do you work for the Royals? There seems to be an elevated sense of hostility in even discussing this...especially about a franchise that's been less successful the past 20 years than the LA Clippers, the previous benchmark for pro sports futility.

No argument with this. Defending Glass's past "approach" would be a joke. But continuing to bitch about it is equally futile.

Things seem to be going in the right direction now, so get over it.

beavis 10-13-2008 12:22 PM

Love the Seitzer hire. I think he was a scapegoat in AZ.

tomahawk kid 10-13-2008 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beavis (Post 5111636)
Love the Seitzer hire. I think he was a scapegoat in AZ.

Me too.

Great to get someone in the clubhouse who remembers what a proud franchise this used to be.

whoman69 10-13-2008 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5111363)
Do position coaches in baseball really make all that much a difference??

How about some better talent??

Not going to get better talent unless they can keep the promising stars they have. This franchise is designed like a farm team.

kstater 10-13-2008 07:28 PM

LMAO
Gets me every time.


Rusty Kuntz

tk13 10-13-2008 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111499)
First off, there's no such thing as a "fair weather" Royals fan. When you haven't won anything in 23 years, and you still have the energy to even care, that's the very definition of not being "fair weather".

If you'd like to compare baseball knowledge, that's another topic. But the simple fact is, this team has been not just bad, but historically bad for most of the past 10 years, and the owner finally doing what he should have been doing all along for ONE year doesn't mask this fact.

Do you work for the Royals? There seems to be an elevated sense of hostility in even discussing this...especially about a franchise that's been less successful the past 20 years than the LA Clippers, the previous benchmark for pro sports futility.

If you cared you'd know we'd spent money the past three seasons, signed guys like Meche and Guillen, had the biggest offer on the table for Kuroda but he turned us down, had the biggest offer on the table for Torii Hunter until the Angels swept in at the last minute and one-upped us. And we will probably once again be big players in free agency.

We've spent as much money in the draft as anyone the past few seasons, not just one. We've increased our presence internationally... we're going after players from Japan. Dayton has put an emphasis on being top-10 in scouting Latin America. Adding a 7th minor league affiliate to help improve player development.

The discussion has moved on... it's not about just spending money, it's about spending it wisely. Whether spending money for guys like Guillen, Furcal, etc, are smart moves.

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 5112856)
Whether spending money for guys like Guillen, Furcal, etc, are smart moves.

Please, no.

CarolinaChiefz 10-13-2008 08:04 PM

"If you cared you'd know..."

Let me get this straight: I don't care because I'm not satisfied with 23 straight seasons of mostly terrible baseball? It takes a leap the size of Carl Peterson's id to connect those dots.

Yes, I know they've signed Gil Meche and Jose Guillen. Neither of them were considered the elite players at their positions in free agency. But the point is valid. It was better than, say, 4 years ago.

Consider the upcoming free agent crop. The players who make the most sense, IMO, when contrasted with the R's needs are players like Teixiera, Adam Dunn, Brad Penny (if he opts out) and Ben Sheets. Think the Glass family will get in the bidding on any of these? Or do you think they'll focus more on retreads like Raul Ibanez, Bobby Abreu and Rafael Furcal? You can guess what I think they'll do, I'd imagine.

I'm not saying that spending FA money is necessarily the way to go, especially not in the long term. But until the farm system begins to regularly bear fruit (and that's still likely 2-3 years away), if they want to be competitive, they're going to have to augment the lineup this way, as there just isn't a ton of talent on the major league roster to trade away.

I'm more hopeful, as I said, than I was 5 years ago. But I need the results on the field.

SHOW.

ME.

tk13 10-13-2008 08:27 PM

We did go after those top tier guys. We'll probably throw a bone out there again. We were right at the top of the bidding for Torii Hunter, and if I'm not mistaken he signed a bigger FA contract than just about any position player, did he not? And we were the leading #1 bidder up until the very last day.

And we did get outbid. But then that's where you have to weigh... would it be worth it to continue to up the bid over $20 mil a year for Torii Hunter? If you think so, then that's fair, but a separate argument.

But the reality of the situation is, no we aren't going to be able to sign all those top guys, but neither will the Indians, Rays, Rockies, etc. We can go after one or two, but the reality is that many of them probably aren't going to be serious about coming here until we start having more success. Winning 75 is a step in that direction, maybe we have a slightly better shot. But unless we can really pull a good sell job you're just gonna have to be patient and hope all this talent we're accumulating in the lower levels works their way up. Until then all we can do is complain.

jidar 10-13-2008 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5111349)
Yes, but that would require spending real money. Not two-first-round-picks money. REAL money. Free agent & internal player retention money (see Beltran, Dye, and hopefully Greinke, with different results).

The kind of money that, despite Jackson county ponying up $250M (more ?) in a recession, the Glass family has yet to commit to the product on the field.

Apparently, in a recent questionnaire about improving fans' experience at the K, several options were listed. Noticeably absent? Better players/better team. Reason? It's cheaper to buy another hot dog stand, miniaturized field for 4-year-olds, or set of toilets than it is a power-hitting corner outfielder, another frontline starter, or anyone else who isn't Mark Teahen, Ross Gload or ....gulp....TPJ.

This is Missouri. SHOW ME.

Bah, they've been doing much better at spending money of late and it's starting to show on the field. This is still a small market team let's not forget, and Rome wasn't built in a day. Yes I know they've sucked for years, but the past two is where they've finally started to spend some money and the results are starting to show, let's give credit where it's due.

banyon 10-13-2008 08:41 PM

What, no one with "print em"?

Ok, well...

(AHEM)


PRINT EM'!!!

Mecca 10-13-2008 09:33 PM

Adam Dunn would give the Royals a legit power guy...

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5113209)
Adam Dunn would give the Royals a legit power guy...

**** no. We need another soft hitting "glove." After all, it looks like Gload might be losing playing time, so we need to find a replacement.

triple 10-13-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarolinaChiefz (Post 5112952)
"If you cared you'd know..."

Let me get this straight: I don't care because I'm not satisfied with 23 straight seasons of mostly terrible baseball? It takes a leap the size of Carl Peterson's id to connect those dots.

Yes, I know they've signed Gil Meche and Jose Guillen. Neither of them were considered the elite players at their positions in free agency. But the point is valid. It was better than, say, 4 years ago.

Consider the upcoming free agent crop. The players who make the most sense, IMO, when contrasted with the R's needs are players like Teixiera, Adam Dunn, Brad Penny (if he opts out) and Ben Sheets. Think the Glass family will get in the bidding on any of these? Or do you think they'll focus more on retreads like Raul Ibanez, Bobby Abreu and Rafael Furcal? You can guess what I think they'll do, I'd imagine.

I'm not saying that spending FA money is necessarily the way to go, especially not in the long term. But until the farm system begins to regularly bear fruit (and that's still likely 2-3 years away), if they want to be competitive, they're going to have to augment the lineup this way, as there just isn't a ton of talent on the major league roster to trade away.

I'm more hopeful, as I said, than I was 5 years ago. But I need the results on the field.

SHOW.

ME.

he just told you all the reasons why the culture is different now, and common sense tells you it's going to be a five year plan or so to rehab an organization from ashes... but you're going to spit out your pacifier and bawl as long as they don't drop a world series trophy in your lap, so what's the point?

triple 10-13-2008 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5113216)
**** no. We need another soft hitting "glove." After all, it looks like Gload might be losing playing time, so we need to find a replacement.

if you've got a good lineup you can put a homer or nothing guy in there. i'd rather have balanced bats for now. he's an accessory once your team is already getting a lot of runners on.

Mecca 10-13-2008 09:46 PM

Look now with Dunn you shouldn't just look at his BA, he walks a ton to so his OBP is always very high plus his power.

DeezNutz 10-13-2008 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5113243)
if you've got a good lineup you can put a homer or nothing guy in there. i'd rather have balanced bats for now. he's an accessory once your team is already getting a lot of runners on.

Right now this team needs someone with power. A ML team can't go into the last week (if it wasn't, it was very close) of the season without someone hitting 20 HRs. ****ing pathetic.

Coach 10-13-2008 09:57 PM

Another move that I am waiting to see is that Tony Pena Jr. DFA'ed.

CarolinaChiefz 10-13-2008 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5113233)
he just told you all the reasons why the culture is different now, and common sense tells you it's going to be a five year plan or so to rehab an organization from ashes... but you're going to spit out your pacifier and bawl as long as they don't drop a world series trophy in your lap, so what's the point?

Pacifier? Really?? Literally L'ing OL. I believe I've expressed legit concerns about the "plan" to which we've all been witness, and you keep bringing the conversation back to some obtuse, ill-formed conclusion that I'm somehow "a fair weather fan", being a baby, or some other non-sensical point.

World Series trophy? Nah. I'd like 82+ wins with more regularity than once every 5 Olympic cycles...and...dare we dream???...a playoff appearance more often than once every 23 years.

Since our guys have last tasted post season, compact discs have gone into widespread distribution, Michael Jackson has been through 5 noses, Kiss has had 17 farewell tours, and Carl Peterson was an effective sports executive.

Here's an idea: get over yourself. After 20+ of futility and 35+ years of being a fan of this franchise, I've earned the right to be a little frustrated (and Jackson county taxpayers moreso), even if things have improved--albeit modestly--of late. If you struggle to understand this, or moreover, childishly attack anyone with an opinion counter to yours, methinks we've got little left to discuss. I'm cool with a difference of opinion. Everyone's entitled to what they think, including me. But the dismissive/petty stuff is just nonsense. Even if you WERE David or Dan Glass.

Either way, we want the same thing (I assume): for the Royals to be a respectable, winning franchise again.

Show.

Me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.