ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 810 vs 610 on Thigy (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199345)

petegz28 12-29-2008 02:58 PM

810 vs 610 on Thigy
 
So this afternoon I am driving around and I hear KK going off abou tThigy not being the man and such. Ok, commercial comes so I flip to 610. On 610 they are arguing that Thigy deserves a shot and pointing out the stats pre and post Thigy and such.

You almost wonder if they plan this shit? Anyhow, if KK is so staunch in his opposition of Thigy then I say we definitely need to give Thigy a shot.

So this seems it will be the ongoing argument over the next several weeks. Some people are going to be very pissed off come draft time when we make our first selection.

Hammock Parties 12-29-2008 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337220)
Some people are going to be very pissed off come draft time when we make our first selection.

Why?

Herm's ass is outta here.

We will draft a REAL QB. He will put Thigpen to shame in camp.

beach tribe 12-29-2008 03:00 PM

Kill yourself.

Bowser 12-29-2008 03:01 PM

Someone needs to tell 610 that Carl is gone, and they need to stop sucking up to the Chiefs.

penguinz 12-29-2008 03:15 PM

Why would we not want pigpen and his mid 50's fourth quarter QB rating?

Reerun_KC 12-29-2008 03:16 PM

KK is being a smart ass about Thigpen....

Reerun_KC 12-29-2008 03:18 PM

9 of the 12 remaining in the playoffs this year are all 1st round picks...

blaise 12-29-2008 03:24 PM

I can't stand KK, but I'm almost to the point where I can't listen to Neal anymore. "Do you think Tyler Thigpen is the man, yes or no? Give us a call."
"Um, I think he's the man, cause he runs around."
"No, he's never gonna be an NFL QB"
repeat 50 times
Same thing with Herm. "Should Herm be fired, yes or no? Give us a call."
For 4 hours, come on.
I know today is different because there's an expectaion that Herm could be fired but Neal's topics for discussion are so limited. When you listen to shows in other markets people can call in and discuss a variety of topics: baseball, NBA, other football teams in other cities. But for some reason in KC it's "This segment we're talking strictly about ___." It gets tedious.

petegz28 12-29-2008 03:45 PM

Thigy has a better TD-INT ratio than both Rothlisberger and Delhome. Is Thigy a Manning? Probably not. Do we need a line to protect whoever is the QB more than a new QB? Hell yes! Do we need a defense to keep the lead Thigy or other QB's hand them? Hell yes!

Reerun_KC 12-29-2008 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337358)
Thigy has a better TD-INT ratio than both Rothlisberger and Delhome. Is Thigy a Manning? Probably not. Do we need a line to protect whoever is the QB more than a new QB? Hell yes! Do we need a defense to keep the lead Thigy or other QB's hand them? Hell yes!

Will we win a superbowl with Thiggy pen?

petegz28 12-29-2008 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5337362)
Will we win a superbowl with Thiggy pen?

With our defense we aren't going to win shit. If Dilfer can win a SB Thigy can. A 1st round QB is nice if he has a team around him to protect him and keep the leads. Right now all we will do is get the guy hurt and be running out our 2nd and 3rd string guys every game.

petegz28 12-29-2008 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5337362)
Will we win a superbowl with Thiggy pen?


You realize both Carolina and the Steelers have a running game and solid defenses. I do not know how a QB, no matter how good he is, is going to win anything without either a solid running game and a solid defense to support him?

kcxiv 12-29-2008 03:51 PM

I tried to listen to KK a few min ago, and my god. How does he get that job? He's horrible. I had to turn it off. He's a douche to anyone that doesnt really agree with him, then when they dont, he goes, thanks for the call and cuts them completely off. lol I heard him say, if Stafford is gone you draft Bradford at number 3! You dont get scared, but you just pull the trigger. lol

Anyways, i rather just watch espn over listening to his ass and i hate ESPN now days.

Reerun_KC 12-29-2008 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337367)
With our defense we aren't going to win shit. If Dilfer can win a SB Thigy can. A 1st round QB is nice if he has a team around him to protect him and keep the leads. Right now all we will do is get the guy hurt and be running out our 2nd and 3rd string guys every game.

What round was Trent Dilfer Drafted in? Hint he was drafted in 1994 by Tampa Bay...

blueballs 12-29-2008 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5337313)
I can't stand KK, but I'm almost to the point where I can't listen to Neal anymore. "Do you think Tyler Thigpen is the man, yes or no? Give us a call."
"Um, I think he's the man, cause he runs around."
"No, he's never gonna be an NFL QB"
repeat 50 times
Same thing with Herm. "Should Herm be fired, yes or no? Give us a call."
For 4 hours, come on.
I know today is different because there's an expectaion that Herm could be fired but Neal's topics for discussion are so limited. When you listen to shows in other markets people can call in and discuss a variety of topics: baseball, NBA, other football teams in other cities. But for some reason in KC it's "This segment we're talking strictly about ___." It gets tedious.

chosing between keeping Neal or Marty was a losing proposition
they still chose the wrong one
Neal "I want to be controversial" Jones sucks mucho ass

Reerun_KC 12-29-2008 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337370)
You realize both Carolina and the Steelers have a running game and solid defenses. I do not know how a QB, no matter how good he is, is going to win anything without either a solid running game and a solid defense to support him?

Agree to a point.... And its okay to disagree....

HC_Chief 12-29-2008 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5337313)
I can't stand KK, but I'm almost to the point where I can't listen to Neal anymore. "Do you think Tyler Thigpen is the man, yes or no? Give us a call."
"Um, I think he's the man, cause he runs around."
"No, he's never gonna be an NFL QB"
repeat 50 times
Same thing with Herm. "Should Herm be fired, yes or no? Give us a call."
For 4 hours, come on.
I know today is different because there's an expectaion that Herm could be fired but Neal's topics for discussion are so limited. When you listen to shows in other markets people can call in and discuss a variety of topics: baseball, NBA, other football teams in other cities. But for some reason in KC it's "This segment we're talking strictly about ___." It gets tedious.

Yeah, Neal Jones is a fuqtard, no doubt about that. Not that KK is any better...

Ultra Peanut 12-29-2008 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5337295)
9 of the 12 remaining in the playoffs this year are all 1st round picks...

But it's too risky. There's only a ~50% chance you'll get a Pro Bowl QB with your top five pick.

DJ's left nut 12-29-2008 03:55 PM

TYLER THIGPENS QB RATING IS LOWER THAN JAMARCUS RUSSELL'S!!!

Jeebuz folks, what more needs to be said? His line is better than Oaklands, his offense was better suited for passing than Oakland's, his WRs are better than Oaklands and still JaMarcus Russell had a better season.

JAMARCUS. RUSSELL.

blaise 12-29-2008 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5337386)
But it's too risky. There's only a ~50% chance you'll get a Pro Bowl QB with your top five pick.

Scared money don't make money.

Ultra Peanut 12-29-2008 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337370)
You realize both Carolina and the Steelers have a running game and solid defenses. I do not know how a QB, no matter how good he is, is going to win anything without either a solid running game and a solid defense to support him?

And the Chiefs of the '90s show that the inverse is true, as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5337389)
Scared money don't make money.

We should just trade down and take a tackle.

blaise 12-29-2008 03:58 PM

What a frigging disaster they are. Seriously. They're worse than the Lions.

suds79 12-29-2008 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5337313)
I can't stand KK, but I'm almost to the point where I can't listen to Neal anymore. "Do you think Tyler Thigpen is the man, yes or no? Give us a call."
"Um, I think he's the man, cause he runs around."
"No, he's never gonna be an NFL QB"
repeat 50 times
Same thing with Herm. "Should Herm be fired, yes or no? Give us a call."
For 4 hours, come on.
I know today is different because there's an expectaion that Herm could be fired but Neal's topics for discussion are so limited. When you listen to shows in other markets people can call in and discuss a variety of topics: baseball, NBA, other football teams in other cities. But for some reason in KC it's "This segment we're talking strictly about ___." It gets tedious.

:clap: That's funny because you nailed it.

He does do that crap a lot.

I kinda like Chris & Cowboy's show on 610 from 9-11. Their arguments seem to make more sense to me.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:11 PM

I'm not a huge fan of KK but I agree with him on his Thigpen and drafting a QB thing.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5337378)
What round was Trent Dilfer Drafted in? Hint he was drafted in 1994 by Tampa Bay...

I assume you wil say 1st round. But I would hardly say he was the proverbial 1st round type once he played in the NFL. But I could say, what round was Brady drafted in?

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337442)
I assume you wil say 1st round. But I would hardly say he was the proverbial 1st round type once he played in the NFL. But I could say, what round was Brady drafted in?

It's playing the odds 16 of the last 29 QB's to win a bowl are 1st rounder...6 of the 13 that aren't are accounted for by 2 players.

It's basically a 99% chance that a 1st round pick will win the the bowl this year upping the number again.

BigChiefFan 12-29-2008 04:15 PM

I hate to pile on but Neal Jones is a homer deluxe and not very insightful, when it comes to sports.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5337390)
And the Chiefs of the '90s show that the inverse is true, as well.

We should just trade down and take a tackle.

The Chiefs made the mistake of letting Carl dictate that Grbac started instead of Gannon in the playoffs. Otherwise we could of won. Hell even with Bono if the damn kicker makes 2 FG's we win. It can be argued both ways, for sure. But I think if we stick a top rated QB in our offense right now we are going to see our 2nd and 3rd string QB's anyway.

Too many nightmares of our line allowing Huard to get sacked as soon as he took the snap.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337444)
It's playing the odds 16 of the last 29 QB's to win a bowl are 1st rounder...6 of the 13 that aren't are accounted for by 2 players.

It's basically a 99% chance that a 1st round pick will win the the bowl this year upping the number again.

I don't disagree. But odds are just that. I am not saying to ink Thigy as the starter. Just give him a fair shot in the offseason to compete.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:17 PM

You know why Carl wouldn't draft a QB high right? Picks like that if they don't work out get people fired, he played it safe and then talked up the fear of it so people would buy into it.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 5337387)
TYLER THIGPENS QB RATING IS LOWER THAN JAMARCUS RUSSELL'S!!!

Jeebuz folks, what more needs to be said? His line is better than Oaklands, his offense was better suited for passing than Oakland's, his WRs are better than Oaklands and still JaMarcus Russell had a better season.

JAMARCUS. RUSSELL.

The same #1 pick Jamarcus Russel?

BigChiefFan 12-29-2008 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337447)
The Chiefs made the mistake of letting Carl dictate that Grbac started instead of Gannon in the playoffs. Otherwise we could of won. Hell even with Bono if the damn kicker makes 2 FG's we win. It can be argued both ways, for sure. But I think if we stick a top rated QB in our offense right now we are going to see our 2nd and 3rd string QB's anyway.

Too many nightmares of our line allowing Huard to get sacked as soon as he took the snap.

Then how come Thiggy is still standing? That's an awful big assumption. I would think the Chiefs will lean towards FA and the draft, to assure themselves that money man gets protected, so they can develop their guy.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5337457)
Then how come Thiggy is still standing? That's an awful big assumption. I would think the Chiefs will lean towards FA and the draft, to assure themselves that money man gets protected, so they can develop their guy.

Cause we changed to the spread. Which I have argued from day 1, has helped the O-line more than Thigy.

Did you see LJ getting tackled as soon as he got the handoff yesterday? That was from under center. Our offensive line cannot block for an under center style of offense. What makes you think they can?

DJ's left nut 12-29-2008 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337451)
The same #1 pick Jamarcus Russel?

Yes.

Nobody has ever said that a #1 pick is a surefire winner. However, the odds are much better for those guys than they are later picks.

Additionally, JaMarcus Russell was a first rounder because Al Davis is a moron. Russell was no better than a high 2nd rounder based on his actual ability. Combine that with his 2 cent head and evident disregard for actually learning how to play NFL football and you have a 5th round pick.

And he outperformed Tyler Thigpen.

Just sayin'

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 5337387)
TYLER THIGPENS QB RATING IS LOWER THAN JAMARCUS RUSSELL'S!!!

Jeebuz folks, what more needs to be said? His line is better than Oaklands, his offense was better suited for passing than Oakland's, his WRs are better than Oaklands and still JaMarcus Russell had a better season.

JAMARCUS. RUSSELL.

Have you seen the last few raider games? He played pretty well. He was complete crap for half the season though. WE will see what he has next year as it would be his 3rd year.

Oh yeah, they also have a running game and dont have to rely on only passing. We do.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:26 PM

The same JaMarcus Russell that every makes fun of constantly? The same as everyone made fun of Vick....

Funny how things change so fast.

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337475)
The same JaMarcus Russell that every makes fun of constantly? The same as everyone made fun of Vick....

Funny how things change so fast.

Depends who is everybody. I dont usually make fun of other players. Not my style. Even if they suck, they are still getting paid alot. So they did something right.

Brock 12-29-2008 04:27 PM

Jamarcus Russell should be made fun of. He's a number one pick who has sucked.

BigChiefFan 12-29-2008 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337465)
Cause we changed to the spread. Which I have argued from day 1, has helped the O-line more than Thigy.

Did you see LJ getting tackled as soon as he got the handoff yesterday? That was from under center. Our offensive line cannot block for an under center style of offense. What makes you think they can?

Again...I would think the Chiefs will lean towards FA and the draft, to assure themselves that money man gets protected.

Granted the O-line was less than stellar this year, but I can't say for certain, that a rookie would automatically be injured like you imply.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:29 PM

JaMarcus Russell playing better than the QB of our team and the Raiders having a better record should put all of his in perspective for the some who don't seem to see it.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5337483)
Jamarcus Russell should be made fun of. He's a number one pick who has sucked.

In the words of Chiefsplanet "hes basically a rookie!"

DJ's left nut 12-29-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5337468)
Have you seen the last few raider games? He played pretty well. He was complete crap for half the season though. WE will see what he has next year as it would be his 3rd year.

Oh yeah, they also have a running game and dont have to rely on only passing. We do.

He's the reason we're picking #3 in the first instead of #2. He absolutely gave us the Oakland game.

That was about a month ago.

There is no favorable comparisons to be made when the other side of the 'V.' is JaMarcus Russell.

Brock 12-29-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337490)
JaMarcus Russell playing better than the QB of our team and the Raiders having a better record should put all of his in perspective for the some who don't seem to see it.

Shouldn't he, and shouldn't they?

Brock 12-29-2008 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337492)
In the words of Chiefsplanet "hes basically a rookie!"

Compare him to the good QBs taken lately and get back to me.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:33 PM

I don't even like JaMarcus Russell but when the team that we have all made fun of a million times dumbass fat QB is better than ours that puts perspective on this.

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337490)
JaMarcus Russell playing better than the QB of our team and the Raiders having a better record should put all of his in perspective for the some who don't seem to see it.

I would agree, if Jamarcus was actually winning games for them. He's not. Its their running game. We have none. Thats not Tylers fault. Hell, we havent had a solid running game in 2 years. Raiders are winning because of their running game and their defense isnt 31st in the league.

I dont give a **** if Tyler is the starter or not next year. Thats not for me to decide, the coaches and Gm will take care of all of that, but saying the Raiders have a better record because of their QB is just stupid.

Brock 12-29-2008 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337504)
I don't even like JaMarcus Russell but when the team that we have all made fun of a million times dumbass fat QB is better than ours that puts perspective on this.

With the very slight difference that the Chiefs didn't piss away a NUMBER ONE OVERALL PICK on theirs.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5337505)
I would agree, if Jamarcus was actually winning games for them. He's not. Its their running game. We have none. Thats not Tylers fault. Hell, we havent had a solid running game in 2 years. Raiders are winning because of their running game and their defense isnt 31st in the league.

I dont give a **** if Tyler is the starter or not next year. Thats not for me to decide, the coaches and Gm will take care of all of that, but saying the Raiders have a better record because of their QB is just stupid.

The Raiders are playing the way Herm Edwards said he wanted the Chiefs to play....it's really bizarre to be honest.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5337488)
Again...I would think the Chiefs will lean towards FA and the draft, to assure themselves that money man gets protected.

Granted the O-line was less than stellar this year, but I can't say for certain, that a rookie would automatically be injured like you imply.

I think anyone, rookie or otherwise, will get inured with this line if we go under center. Our entire right side cannot block for an under center offense.

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337517)
The Raiders are playing the way Herm Edwards said he wanted the Chiefs to play....it's really bizarre to be honest.

They ended their season on a positive note no doubt. Thats what i wanted to see from the Chiefs, but we collapsed. I said i just want to see the team win a few games at the end of the season and for the team to be getting better. It didnt happen. We showed only flashes at time, but then after them flashes HUGE HUGE mistakes. Its like they take 1 step forward then go right back to where they were.

Anyways, We will see what happens.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337525)
I think anyone, rookie or otherwise, will get inured with this line if we go under center. Our entire right side cannot block for an under center offense.

I don't agree with that plenty of guys take hits and don't get hurt...the Chiefs just happen to have injury prone QB's...cmon Croyle and Huard?

The_Doctor10 12-29-2008 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5337362)
Will we win a superbowl with Thiggy pen?

You didn't win a Super Bowl with Trent green, Joe Montana, Warren Moon... Defences, kids. If you have a defence that can make stops and your offense puts up points on a consistent basis and your coaches aren't frickin morons, you win. Period.

KCChiefsMan 12-29-2008 04:45 PM

After the past few weeks I'm for a QB, Stafford or Bradford would be great.

The_Doctor10 12-29-2008 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5337507)
With the very slight difference that the Chiefs didn't piss away a NUMBER ONE OVERALL PICK on theirs.

This.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337535)
I don't agree with that plenty of guys take hits and don't get hurt...the Chiefs just happen to have injury prone QB's...cmon Croyle and Huard?

How many games do we have to play with getting one 1st down in a half before you realize our O-line cannot block for an under center style O?

How many times prior to the spread were we in 3rd and 8+ as opposed to 3rd and less than 5?

Our O-line simply cannot block for an under center offense. They needed the spread worse than Thigpen did, imo.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury (Post 5337536)
You didn't win a Super Bowl with Trent green, Joe Montana, Warren Moon... Defences, kids. If you have a defence that can make stops and your offense puts up points on a consistent basis and your coaches aren't frickin morons, you win. Period.

That's way to simplistic it requires a mix, you aren't gonna win the bowl with a great defense and a game manager offense either, reference the Chiefs 90s for that.

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:49 PM

I seen a few times where it took Thigpen a few seconds to collect himself before he got up. He's much tougher then Broken Croyle or Damon Huard, but even the best QB's in the league can get hurt. Our oline just increases the chances big time.

I thing that pisses me off is that when we run the ball, last year and this year, is when the RB gets the ball, there is already 1-3 defenders that are already penetrated into our backfield. It happens so many times, i sit there and am like wow. WTF seriously. Then i see the other team on 3rd and 1 or 4 and one fall forward for 4 yards. lol

Its embarrassing.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337552)
How many games do we have to play with getting one 1st down in a half before you realize our O-line cannot block for an under center style O?

How many times prior to the spread were we in 3rd and 8+ as opposed to 3rd and less than 5?

Our O-line simply cannot block for an under center offense. They needed the spread worse than Thigpen did, imo.

That means you think the Chiefs have some of the worst talent in the history of the game then because even 0-16 Detroit lined up normally.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337554)
That's way to simplistic it requires a mix, you aren't gonna win the bowl with a great defense and a game manager offense either, reference the Chiefs 90s for that.

Tell that to Baltimore or Pittsburgh.

blueballs 12-29-2008 04:51 PM

JaMarcus - V Young - M Vick -T Jackson
may open the black QB debate again
how's the Redskins QB doing

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337562)
That means you think the Chiefs have some of the worst talent in the history of the game then because even 0-16 Detroit lined up normally.

Well, considering we just had the worst team in Chiefs history.......:hmmm:

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337554)
That's way to simplistic it requires a mix, you aren't gonna win the bowl with a great defense and a game manager offense either, reference the Chiefs 90s for that.

Ravens, Steelers and Buc's did it. They did have first round QB's, but Dilfer was already a bust. Brad Johnson was about 36 years old and been passed around, both guys were just game managers. Steelers were mostly a ground and pound offense as well and Ben was in his what 2nd year?

All 3 teams QB's were game managers though.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337564)
Tell that to Baltimore or Pittsburgh.

Do you realize how good Baltimore's defense was? Also do you really want to build to be the 1 and done team?

kcxiv 12-29-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337572)
Do you realize how good Baltimore's defense was? Also do you really want to build to be the 1 and done team?

After 40 years, if the Chiefs could do it next year, i think 99 percent of the fan base will love it.

petegz28 12-29-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337572)
Do you realize how good Baltimore's defense was? Also do you really want to build to be the 1 and done team?

I would like to get the 1 before we worry about the done.

talastan 12-29-2008 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337580)
I would like to get the 1 before we worry about the done.

QFT

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:55 PM

I'll give those teams credit for taking advantage of the situations they were in. But right now it's gonna be hard to do that because there are great QB's there every year.

The_Doctor10 12-29-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337562)
That means you think the Chiefs have some of the worst talent in the history of the game then because even 0-16 Detroit lined up normally.

The chiefs lined up in the spread and didn't take the collar; what's your point?

The Chiefs talent at the skill positions isn't AWFUL; the entire right side of the o-line couldn't block a sea turtle in the middle of the desert.

Mecca 12-29-2008 04:59 PM

The entire premise of the spread is to try to use a scheme to even out talent when you are less talented because in college usually even the best teams don't go 4 and 5 deep at CB, in the NFL it let the Chiefs not get blown out but didn't net them any great results.

petegz28 12-29-2008 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337601)
The entire premise of the spread is to try to use a scheme to even out talent when you are less talented because in college usually even the best teams don't go 4 and 5 deep at CB, in the NFL it let the Chiefs not get blown out but didn't net them any great results.

I know, our 32nd ranked defense had nothing to do with blowin 2+ score leads in the last minute of games.

The_Doctor10 12-29-2008 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337601)
The entire premise of the spread is to try to use a scheme to even out talent when you are less talented because in college usually even the best teams don't go 4 and 5 deep at CB, in the NFL it let the Chiefs not get blown out but didn't net them any great results.

It didn't net them any results because they had an awful defence! Unless you want Tony G lining up at LB and D-bowe playing safety with Albert clogging up the middle, allowing dorsey to move over to left end, the blame for a lack of wins falls squarely on the defence's shoulders.

Mecca 12-29-2008 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337612)
I know, our 32nd ranked defense had nothing to do with blowin 2+ score leads in the last minute of games.

What I told you last week, happened again this week when the defense gives up less points the offense is worse...it's the entire team being bad not just one side.

smittysbar 12-29-2008 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5337373)
I tried to listen to KK a few min ago, and my god. How does he get that job? He's horrible. I had to turn it off. He's a douche to anyone that doesnt really agree with him, then when they dont, he goes, thanks for the call and cuts them completely off. lol I heard him say, if Stafford is gone you draft Bradford at number 3! You dont get scared, but you just pull the trigger. lol

Anyways, i rather just watch espn over listening to his ass and i hate ESPN now days.

I agree with KK 100% on this

kcxiv 12-29-2008 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5337612)
I know, our 32nd ranked defense had nothing to do with blowin 2+ score leads in the last minute of games.

Yep, Mecca never acknowledges defenses. Only offense and if you can score on the last drive of the game. He doesnt care if the Defense is ranked 31st or not. I just dont get it at times. Defense defense defense. Defense just cant be corrected overnight as he thinks. We been trying for going on 9 years now.

Mecca 12-29-2008 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury (Post 5337613)
It didn't net them any results because they had an awful defence! Unless you want Tony G lining up at LB and D-bowe playing safety with Albert clogging up the middle, allowing dorsey to move over to left end, the blame for a lack of wins falls squarely on the defence's shoulders.

Yea Tyler Thigpen is the worst 4th quarter QB in the NFL...the Chiefs offense in the 2nd halfs in general was complete garbage.

Explain to me why they could only score 30 points when the other team had 38 or 50? So then when the other teams got 22 or 16 they could only muster 20 or say 6.

It's called the entire team being bad.

Mecca 12-29-2008 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5337618)
Yep, Mecca never acknowledges defenses. Only offense and if you can score on the last drive of the game. He doesnt care if the Defense is ranked 31st or not. I just dont get it at times. Defense defense defense. Defense just cant be corrected overnight as he thinks. We been trying for going on 9 years now.

Don't let the stupidity of the Chiefs fool you here, fixing a defense is much easier than finding a top QB and building an offense especially when you are at the square 1 point the Chiefs are.

The_Doctor10 12-29-2008 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337619)
Yea Tyler Thigpen is the worst 4th quarter QB in the NFL...the Chiefs offense in the 2nd halfs in general was complete garbage.

Explain to me why they could only score 30 points when the other team had 38 or 50? So then when the other teams got 22 or 16 they could only muster 20 or say 6.

It's called the entire team being bad.

So fix the aspect of the team that was the most god-awful. Look, if you have a car with two flat tires and a windshield wiper motor that doesn't work, what are you going to fix first? The flat tires, because otherwise your car's a useless hunk of metal. the Chiefs defence turns this team into a useless hunk of metal, not Tyler Thigpen. Who, by the way, is a rookie in almost every respect except he's got one year of practice roster time. Look at Eli's first half-season as a starter. Hell, look at his career until last year. He was a slower, stronger-armed Thigpen. Now he's a super bowl champ. And don't tell me 'At least he was accurate' because prior to the playoffs last season he struggled to get his completion % above 60.

Mecca 12-29-2008 05:16 PM

I consider QB the most important thing on the team building without that is like building a car with no engine.

kcxiv 12-29-2008 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5337623)
Don't let the stupidity of the Chiefs fool you here, fixing a defense is much easier than finding a top QB and building an offense especially when you are at the square 1 point the Chiefs are.

Regardless, it still hasnt been fixed in almost 9 years. I thought as did many others, if nothing else Herm was going to at least bring a solid defense to th is team. Hasnt happened.

I think we have to fix that defense. I dont even care if its through free agency. I thinkwe have enough young guys that we can add 2 good free agents to help. Are whole starting 2ndary is drafted. Our whole Dline has been drafted. 1 of our linebackers has been drafted. A few vets wouldnt be bad, but we also need better coaching.

Mecca 12-29-2008 05:19 PM

Well that's what they get for keeping Gunther around.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.