ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs All kidding aside, #3 pick? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200929)

no love 01-23-2009 02:50 PM

All kidding aside, #3 pick?
 
I keep reading that this year's draft is lean on QB's, DE, and others.
Does this mean that there is there is fat at the other positions?
Hall of Fame type fat?
We are due to draft our next hall of famer.
Who is this draft class' future hall of famer? and can we get him with the 3rd pick?
If you say stafford, well, I say BS

The Franchise 01-23-2009 02:51 PM

Stafford

talastan 01-23-2009 02:51 PM

Aaron Curry looks promising at OLB, but HOF potential Idk. I really haven't gotten to see him play, but at #3 you have to have that future HOF player there.

CoMoChief 01-23-2009 02:52 PM

I dont think Stafford is worth 3
" " " Sanchez is worth 3

We have to trade down a little bit.
Hell I wouldnt even mind Maclin if we traded down.

CoMoChief 01-23-2009 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5418994)
Stafford

No

The Franchise 01-23-2009 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5419002)
No

Douche.

Basileus777 01-23-2009 02:54 PM

There is no such thing as a sure HOF player. Not even close.

DeezNutz 01-23-2009 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5419000)
Hell I wouldnt even mind Maclin if we traded down.

This makes my head hurt.

RedThat 01-23-2009 02:56 PM

Pioli will trade down just watch and see.

Deberg_1990 01-23-2009 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5419000)
I dont think Stafford is worth 3
" " " Sanchez is worth 3

We have to trade down a little bit.
Hell I wouldnt even mind Maclin if we traded down.

What does worth number 3 mean?

To me a number 3 pick should be a 10 year starter at the very least.

RustShack 01-23-2009 02:57 PM

Its funny when people say Sanchez and Stafford will be top picks next year, but they shouldn't be this year.

Fritz88 01-23-2009 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5419003)
Douche.

Back at ya.

CoMoChief 01-23-2009 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5419019)
What does worth number 3 mean?

To me a number 3 pick should be a 10 year starter at the very least.

Top 5 pick at the very least should become Probowlers within just a few seasons.

Fritz88 01-23-2009 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5419016)
Pioli will trade down just watch and see.

I would love to see that.

RedThat 01-23-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419026)
Its funny when people say Sanchez and Stafford will be top picks next year, but they shouldn't be this year.

Well, they are the top prospects coming out. And a lot of times when top QB's come out they usually end up being drafted high. nothing guaranteed though.

The Franchise 01-23-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 5419027)
Back at ya.

Same to you.

CoMoChief 01-23-2009 03:00 PM

Stafford's the worst QB Ive seen to be projected that high in quite some time, well since Alex Smith

RedThat 01-23-2009 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 5419034)
I would love to see that.

Me too. It would be very wise choice for a team that has many many holes.

CaliforniaChief 01-23-2009 03:03 PM

I'm of the belief that we might actually be able to trade down to #10 (San Francisco might want to get in front of Seattle in order to grab Sanchez or Stafford.) If we do this, then I'd like to see us get a guy like Maulauga from USC. If we stay at #3, I'm a fan of drafting the best tackle available so that we can set our tackles for the next 10 years. If we don't keep improving the line, we're going to struggle to keep QB's healthy.

If i could choose between Stafford and Sanchez, I'll take Sanchez hands down. He's more mobile and yeah, he's only been a starter for 1 year, but the kid's a leader and a winner. I like his attitude.

rad 01-23-2009 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no love (Post 5418990)
I keep reading that this year's draft is lean on QB's, DE, and others.
Does this mean that there is there is fat at the other positions?
Hall of Fame type fat?
We are due to draft our next hall of famer.
Who is this draft class' future hall of famer? and can we get him with the 3rd pick?
If you say stafford, well, I say BS


Who's BS?

ChiefBrad 01-23-2009 03:03 PM

Draft Curry or Crabtree

Tribal Warfare 01-23-2009 03:04 PM

Stafford has alot of things working for him to be the KC pick one he lives next to the head Teaxas regional scout for the Chiefs, and lives in the same area that the Hunts do. Thus, he probably has already met them while he was still in highschool.

tyton75 01-23-2009 03:05 PM

I need to poop

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5419044)
Stafford's the worst QB Ive seen to be projected that high in quite some time, well since Alex Smith

Hes a better prospect than Ryan in every way...

ChiefsCountry 01-23-2009 03:06 PM

If CoMo doesnt like a guy its a good sign to take him.

DeezNutz 01-23-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5419044)
Stafford's the worst QB Ive seen to be projected that high in quite some time, well since Alex Smith

These two players are not at all similar. In any way.

ChiefBrad 01-23-2009 03:08 PM

Curry or Crabtree... Or a DE but not a qb Thigpen is pretty good we need D. Or if Crabtree is to talented to pass on then take the best player. Tony is gonna be finished sometime soon, so we could use that 1-2 punch. For now are very good 1,2,3 punch. + the running game.

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefBrad (Post 5419087)
Curry or Crabtree... Or a DE but not a qb Thigpen is pretty good we need D. Or if Crabtree is to talented to pass on then take the best player. Tony is gonna be finished sometime soon, so we could use that 1-2 punch. For now are very good 1,2,3 punch. + the running game.

You know we already have a possession WR in Bowe right?

The Franchise 01-23-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5419082)
If CoMo doesnt like a guy its a good sign to take him.

I'm starting to learn that.

DeezNutz 01-23-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419098)
You know we already have a possession WR in Bowe right?

That means he's supposed to catch the ball, right?

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5419130)
That means he's supposed to catch the ball, right?

And that hes kind of big and slow.

DaWolf 01-23-2009 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5419130)
That means he's supposed to catch the ball, right?

ROFL:doh!:

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 5419062)
I'm of the belief that we might actually be able to trade down to #10 (San Francisco might want to get in front of Seattle in order to grab Sanchez or Stafford.) If we do this, then I'd like to see us get a guy like Maulauga from USC. If we stay at #3, I'm a fan of drafting the best tackle available so that we can set our tackles for the next 10 years. If we don't keep improving the line, we're going to struggle to keep QB's healthy.

If i could choose between Stafford and Sanchez, I'll take Sanchez hands down. He's more mobile and yeah, he's only been a starter for 1 year, but the kid's a leader and a winner. I like his attitude.

I am tired of reading these statements. Brandon Albert is our LT, period. You don't draft a RT with the 3rd pick.

Mr. Laz 01-23-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5419082)
If CoMo doesnt like a guy its a good sign to take him.

truth

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419157)
I am tired of reading these statements. Brandon Albert is our LT, period. You don't draft a RT with the 3rd pick.

The LT we drafted #3 would be our LT, not RT. I think we should leave Albert at LT, but he wasn't Pioli's pick or our HC's(assuming the axe falls on Herm). They can easily move Albert to guard if they feel hes best there and want thier LT of the future. Its a whole different story if we still had Carl and Herm though.

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419172)
The LT we drafted #3 would be our LT, not RT. I think we should leave Albert at LT, but he wasn't Pioli's pick or our HC's(assuming the axe falls on Herm). They can easily move Albert to guard if they feel hes best there and want thier LT of the future. Its a whole different story if we still had Carl and Herm though.

If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419185)
If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

3rd pick is greater than the 15th pick-your logic flawed.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419172)
The LT we drafted #3 would be our LT, not RT. I think we should leave Albert at LT, but he wasn't Pioli's pick or our HC's(assuming the axe falls on Herm). They can easily move Albert to guard if they feel hes best there and want thier LT of the future. Its a whole different story if we still had Carl and Herm though.

That's what I said. There is no need to move Albert to guard, Pioli isn't going to move him.

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419185)
If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

What if he thinks Albert can the like Will Shields and he thinks whoever we draft could be like Willie Roaf? What if he thinks Albert is just some above average LT?

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419185)
If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

Im quoting this to show my approval of this message.

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419205)
That's what I said. There is no need to move Albert to guard, Pioli isn't going to move him.

You have no idea how Pioli or our HC will think.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-23-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefBrad (Post 5419067)
Draft Curry or Crabtree

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419141)
And that hes kind of big and slow.

Yes, "Fitz-Mania" has staunched the flow of blood to the brain due to the collective man-crush/hard on experienced by some fans.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419206)
What if he thinks Albert can the like Will Shields and he thinks whoever we draft could be like Willie Roaf? What if he thinks Albert is just some above average LT?

Will Shields was found in the third round IIRC. You don't waste a top 5 pick on a guard.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419210)
You have no idea how Pioli or our HC will think.

He IS NOT going to move him, why would he move him? Albert is fine at his position, what philosphy could they bring in that would hinder Albert at LT??

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5419202)
3rd pick is greater than the 15th pick-your logic flawed.

You missed the point. Albert is going to be a damn good LT, and Pioli will see that.

Andre Smith is NOT better than Albert.

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419219)
Will Shields was found in the third round IIRC. You don't waste a top 5 pick on a guard.

When did I ever say draft an OG in the top 5 you douche bag. Also I said a player like Shields, not Shields...

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419206)
What if he thinks Albert can the like Will Shields and he thinks whoever we draft could be like Willie Roaf? What if he thinks Albert is just some above average LT?

Then you can bump this up and serve me a plate of crow, but I'll take my chances (based on how Albert played at LT - that's the point).

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419224)
You missed the point. Albert is going to be a damn good LT, and Pioli will see that.

Andre Smith is NOT better than Albert.

But Smith is better than Monroe... Monroe must be better than Albert since Albert couldn't start at LT over him... but Albert is better than Smith... :hmmm:

The Franchise 01-23-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419227)
When did I ever say draft an OG in the top 5 you douche bag. Also I said a player like Shields, not Shields...

You would technically be wasting the pick. You already have a LT......go fill another hole. You don't draft a replacement for your young/good LT because you think the LT that is available could be better than him.

bowener 01-23-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419098)
You know we already have a possession WR in Bowe right?

Two possession WR's seems to work for the Cardinals :shrug:
Arent ocho-cinco and TJ Housh considered possession guys too?

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5419241)
You would technically be wasting the pick. You already have a LT......go fill another hole. You don't draft a replacement for your young/good LT because you think the LT that is available could be better than him.

I don't think we should draft a LT, I think we should draft Stafford or Sanchez. MAYBE Curry but I would much rather have the QB.

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419239)
But Smith is better than Monroe... Monroe must be better than Albert since Albert couldn't start at LT over him... but Albert is better than Smith... :hmmm:

Didn't, not couldn't.

I'll wager right now that every OT that gets drafted in the first round this year and starts 15+ games as a rookie gives up more sacks than Albert.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419224)
You missed the point. Albert is going to be a damn good LT, and Pioli will see that.

Andre Smith is NOT better than Albert.

I understand that point completely, were we disagree, is that you are assuming our line needs no help, where as, I see, that ONLY, ALBERT has a long-term future with the team. The rest could use major upgrades and I don't believe Waters will be here for more than a couple of years. I see one spot filled and four that need to be upgraded.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419227)
When did I ever say draft an OG in the top 5 you douche bag. Also I said a player like Shields, not Shields...

Wow, easy there youngster, I made a comment on something you posted. I never accused you of saying that, my point was if you draft another OT, then slide Albert to Guard, it is not a smart move with the way he is playing. It would be the equivolent of drafting a guard in the 5th spot, and paying him LT money, and then dishing even more money out for his replacement LT. Not a smart move when Albert is doing a very good job.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5419241)
You would technically be wasting the pick. You already have a LT......go fill another hole. You don't draft a replacement for your young/good LT because you think the LT that is available could be better than him.

Yep, I said the same thing, but apparently we don't know what we are talking about.

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5419254)
I understand that point completely, were we disagree, is that you are assuming our line needs no help, where as, I see, that ONLY, ALBERT has a long-term future with the team. The rest could use major upgrades and I don't believe Waters will be here for more than a couple of years. I see one spot filled and four that need to be upgraded.

I don't disagree with that at all. I think we need upgrades at C, RG and RT, along with a future prospect for LG -- but none of that has any relevance to the No. 3 pick because ONLY a LT is appropriate there, and we have a damn good (potentially elite) one of those.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5419242)
Two possession WR's seems to work for the Cardinals :shrug:
Arent ocho-cinco and TJ Housh considered possession guys too?

I think CJ and TJ are pretty deceant deep threats. Housh would be more of a possesion reciever than Chad though.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419262)
I don't disagree with that at all. I think we need upgrades at C, RG and RT, along with a future prospect for LG -- but none of that has any relevance to the No. 3 pick because ONLY a LT is appropriate there, and we have a damn good (potentially elite) one of those.

Yep. I understand where you're coming from BigChiefFan, but this post really sums it up IMO. I think we can address our other O-Line issues outside of the first round easily. We could get Mack, Luigs, or one of the other good centers in the 2nd round. I think we might even possibly be able to snatch Alex boone in the 4th if we get really lucky, he is in the 3rd-4th round range right now.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419280)
Yep. I understand where you're coming from BigChiefFan, but this post really sums it up IMO. I think we can address our other O-Line issues outside of the first round easily. We could get Mack, Luigs, or one of the other good centers in the 2nd round. I think we might even possibly be able to snatch Alex boone in the 4th if we get really lucky, he is in the 3rd-4th round range right now.

Good post. We obviously can and will look in the later rounds for upgrades to our line, I just think the LTs of this draft are top 10 picks in most drafts, so I prefer VALUE out of the draft. I'm not advocating going after a LT, just that there are some damn good players there, that could improve our o-line and I wouldn't fault the Chiefs for going down that road is all.


BTW, I think Eugene Monroe is going to kick ass and take names in the NFL.

Pioli Zombie 01-23-2009 04:25 PM

I agree. Thats the Patriot way. Pioli knows the players and if he can get as many picks in the 3rd and 4th rounds as possible he'll do it. Or i could see him trade the 3rd overall pick for someone elses #2,#3,#4 and a #1 next year. And he'll get 4 Pro Bowlers out of it.

ChiefBrad 01-23-2009 09:06 PM

Yeah They Both can go deep and so can Bradley.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419098)
You know we already have a possession WR in Bowe right?

I am not apposed to taking the best linebacker in the draft (Curry) We need a DE also J. Peppers is the best Free Agent veteran out there. He may even be better than J. Allen. If Pioli landed Peppers that would make me very content. Plus a good choice in the 2nd round.... We pick #2 overall in the 2nd round. That can be a good starting linebacker. I am all for Linebackers and Peppers. But Crabtree at 3 is also appealing. I think Thigpen is good why not just give him another weapon. Tony likes him. So do I and Bowe had good numbers + M. Bradley throw in Crabtree with C. Gailey calling plays that could be leathal. You can never have enough weapons and I like Crabtree more than the dude from Missouri.

ChiefBrad 01-23-2009 09:16 PM

jeremy maclin. I like Crabtree better than Maclin

ChiefRon 01-23-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419141)
And that hes kind of big and slow.

Funny, that's what they said about Fitzgerald, possession receiver.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-23-2009 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5421119)
Funny, that's what they said about Fitzgerald, possession receiver.

Crabtree doesn't have the leaping ability, hands, or route running ability to even be mentioned in the same breath as Larry Fitzgerald, dude.

Should every QB with an average arm be compared to Joe Montana? Is that the curve we're grading on now?

ChiefRon 01-23-2009 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5421131)
Crabtree doesn't have the leaping ability, hands, or route running ability to even be mentioned in the same breath as Larry Fitzgerald, dude.

Should every QB with an average arm be compared to Joe Montana? Is that the curve we're grading on now?

I'm just saying, coming out of college, wasn't Fitz labeled as a possession receiver?

Also, are you saying he hasn't improved in his time in the NFL?

Crabtree can't improve his route-running in the same time frame? Or his hands?

kcpasco 01-23-2009 09:25 PM

Sanchez

ChiefRon 01-23-2009 09:27 PM

I prefer we acquire a QB too. I'm fine with Stafford. I like Sanchez a little better. I'd also be cool with Cassel + Crabtree...

SAUTO 01-23-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419141)
And that hes kind of big and slow.

has he ran yet?

DeezNutz 01-23-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5421149)
I'm just saying, coming out of college, wasn't Fitz labeled as a possession receiver?

Also, are you saying he hasn't improved in his time in the NFL?

Crabtree can't improve his route-running in the same time frame? Or his hands?

I don't want any receiver in the top 5 that needs to work on his hands.

Given this draft position, he needs to be a freak.

kcpasco 01-23-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5421161)
I prefer we acquire a QB too. I'm fine with Stafford. I like Sanchez a little better. I'd also be cool with Cassel + Crabtree...

I'd rather have Maclin over Crabtree, we need the speed guy.
Crabtree is the same type reciever as Bowe.

SAUTO 01-23-2009 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5421172)
I don't want any receiver in the top 5 that needs to work on his hands.

Given this draft position, he needs to be freak.

lets see(and i dont like the idea of drafting a WR at 3) crabtree and fitzgerald both played 2 seasons in college and crabtree had the BEST 2 years in college history..

SAUTO 01-23-2009 09:33 PM

also fitz=6'3" 220
crabtree=6'3" 214

DeezNutz 01-23-2009 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5421179)
lets see(and i dont like the idea of drafting a WR at 3) crabtree and fitzgerald both played 2 seasons in college and crabtree had the BEST 2 years in college history..

Spread offense.

Shitty Big 12 defenses.

Tech QB's are known to set records, too. Doesn't mean I want one.

That said, it will be interesting to see what Crabtree runs.

SAUTO 01-23-2009 09:35 PM

fitz 40 yards time=4.68
walter football has crabtree at 4.48

melbar 01-23-2009 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419219)
Will Shields was found in the third round IIRC. You don't waste a top 5 pick on a guard.

If you know he's Will Shields you do....Not that we know that.

melbar 01-23-2009 10:10 PM

Where all my "BPA" peeps at? I dont think its "Ideal" that you pick O-line, but if you get a great player, ,why not? we could do anything we wanted to do offensively when we had 3 all pro players on the line. I think the thinking is that Albert is a very good LT learning the position. If you can get a player who is a natural LT already experienced there and Move Albert to RT or RG where he was projected as a probable Pro bowl player, you can improve 2 positions with 1 pick, not just add a RT or G.
Just sayin thats the argument. Will Shields wasnt exactly a detrement at RG and he was making some serious bank most of his career. 2 great players is > than 1.

That being said, I'd love to see Curry. That kid is a beast with pro-bowl potential. Look what Merriman did for SD. team him with Peppers and we have a serious Defensive upgrade.

Priest31kc 01-23-2009 10:10 PM

Fitz seems alot faster than 4.68, damn.

But id rather have J-Mac over crabtree. Not just because Im a Mizzou homer, but because we need that speed guy on the other side of D Bowe. Plus he will improve our return game greatly, and I can get a Maclin Chiefs jersey.

no love 01-23-2009 10:10 PM

all right.
when I requested planet feedback on the subject, I wasn't necessarily asking who we should draft. (maybe i did but if I really wanted to here a bunch of stafford, sanchez, crabtree, etc I could reference any number of draft threads all over nfl boards)

Remeber when we drafted gonzales? in the teens, i believe? right off the bat he was HOF potential. If we had known a HOF TE he could have been a top 5. see where I'm going?
so, let me rephrase:
Is there a player who is a man amongst boys at their position who would be worth a number 3 pick?
Is there a position that is so rich with talent, for instance OG, a safety even, or... , that wouldn't normally draft at #3 but the dude is a can't miss?

ChiefRon 01-24-2009 02:50 AM

I'm not sure there's ever a "can't miss" dude...

If we don't get Cassel, it has to be Sanchez or Stafford.

Mecca 01-24-2009 03:02 AM

Michael Crabtree is not Larry Fitzgerald this non sense needs to stop, if anything he's more like Boldin and that's saying he hits better than most think. Crabtree is similar to Bowe, it's a shitty WR year it's helping him and Maclin aswell, neither are worth a top 5 selection to this team.

This team needs 1 of the QB's more than anything, a WR is an exception position in the top 5, these guys aren't the jaw droppers it requires to be a top 5 WR.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.