ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   ChiefsPlanet What does everyone think of supporter powers? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=201289)

dirk digler 01-28-2009 11:14 AM

What does everyone think of supporter powers?
 
To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2.

Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong.

On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately.

So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?

Gonzo 01-28-2009 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433667)
To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2.

Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong.

On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately.

So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?



Good idea for everyone except BKaeding. That guys a dick.












(J/K Buck)

Gonzo 01-28-2009 11:18 AM

In all seriousness.....It proved to have a function yesterday with all the crap that happened.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 5433688)
In all seriousness.....It proved to have a function yesterday with all the crap that happened.

I agree

Hammock Parties 01-28-2009 11:19 AM

So it's only for monthly donaters.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5433693)
So it's only for monthly donaters.

I think so though I could be wrong

Baby Lee 01-28-2009 11:20 AM

It wasn't so much the banning as the attitude of; I can do it, I did it, I have my reasons, I don't care what you think.

The Franchise 01-28-2009 11:21 AM

A monthly charge? I don't know about that. I would make it so that you had to donate a certain amount....if you want to set a limit on it. But requiring people to pay $10 a month just to have the ability to flag people....may make it so that they use their powers more often than not.

Buck 01-28-2009 11:22 AM

I am a dick, but I pay money for my powers...

In all honesty, I don't think there is anything wrong with them.

If you support the website, then you obviously enjoy your time here. I don't think anyone who just wanted to abuse the powers would waste money just so they could **** w/ people.

Hammock Parties 01-28-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433700)
I think so though I could be wrong

I have donated twice and do not have powers. I'm not whining but I have an urge to hand out infractions. :evil:

Buck 01-28-2009 11:22 AM

P.S., I don't think you have to pay $10 a month.

I think I donated $20 a few months ago and $5 last month.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5433720)
P.S., I don't think you have to pay $10 a month.

I think I donated $20 a few months ago and $5 last month.

The minimum is $10 a month

You can go to User CP and Paid Subscriptions and it says 1 month $10

DaKCMan AP 01-28-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433667)
Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong.

screw 'em

Quote:

On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately.

So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?
Good.

Buck 01-28-2009 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433728)
The minimum is $10 a month

You can go to User CP and Paid Subscriptions and it says 1 month $10

I just clicked the Donate button at the top.

I did $20 in Nov, $5 in Dec.

I'm going to donate another $10 right now. Hopefully the donations help offset the cost of running the board.

blueballs 01-28-2009 11:31 AM

some people should not have power
of any ****ing kind

Buck 01-28-2009 11:32 AM

Enjoy your money Kyle.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueballs (Post 5433779)
some people should not have power
of any ****ing kind

But does it matter that everyone has the chance to gain equal power?

DaKCMan AP 01-28-2009 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433787)
But does it matter that everyone has the chance to gain equal power?

Some will always be more equal than others.

http://madanti.tripod.com/Image25.jpg

Buck 01-28-2009 11:36 AM

I wonder after you reach a certain amount of money if you can get even more powers?

Like Invisibility
Super Human Strength and
the ability to shriek really loud

{my best blueballs impression}

seclark 01-28-2009 11:41 AM

don't care.
sec

BigRichard 01-28-2009 11:42 AM

I think I would like to have my supporter have powers. It could make my penis do magic tricks or something.

morphius 01-28-2009 11:45 AM

I worry a bit about it, but so far it hasn't been abused, plus this asylum has always been run by the insane here. When it comes to the porn jackass, I absolutely love that there is a dedicated group with the power to kill the guy off before one of us admins actually catches it.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius (Post 5433861)
I worry a bit about it, but so far it hasn't been abused, plus this asylum has always been run by the insane here. When it comes to the porn jackass, I absolutely love that there is a dedicated group with the power to kill the guy off before one of us admins actually catches it.

So just to clarify you don't think what happened to shtsprayer was wrong and no one abused their power?

Buck 01-28-2009 11:49 AM

I don't really read DC but when I saw the name of that thread, something about the Magic N-word, he probably deserved it.

Baby Lee 01-28-2009 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5433879)
I don't really read DC but when I saw the name of that thread, something about the Magic N-word, he probably deserved it.

Has 'n-word' developed multiple meanings?

Buck 01-28-2009 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5433896)
Has 'n-word' developed multiple meanings?

Well there is the N-word, then there is the n-word I am talking about.

The spanish word for black = negro.

I thought I saw that there, but I could be mistaken. Like I said, I don't frequent that god-forsaken subforum known as the DC.

Bugeater 01-28-2009 12:00 PM

I think it's hilarious that some people are offended by what Shtsprayer said, but no one seems to mind that one user here has had an avatar with a monkey offering Obama a banana for months.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5433938)
I think it's hilarious that some people are offended by what Shtsprayer said, but no one seems to mind that one user here has had an avatar with a monkey offering Obama a banana for months.

I have avatars and sigs turned off so I don't see them anyway. So who is that user?

Buck 01-28-2009 12:06 PM

Yeah, who the hell is that?

CoMoChief 01-28-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 5433680)
Good idea for everyone except BKaeding. That guys a dick.












(J/K Buck)

It is ****in reeruned we give a Chargers fan that kinda power on a Chiefs board.

Just sayin

Buck 01-28-2009 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5433985)
It is ****in reeruned we give a Chargers fan that kinda power on a Chiefs board.

Just sayin

And just how much money have you donated to keep this board running?

Bugeater 01-28-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433963)
I have avatars and sigs turned off so I don't see them anyway. So who is that user?

I don't recall, it's someone who doesn't post very often.

the Talking Can 01-28-2009 12:17 PM

i don't have them, but it is fine by me

and shtsprayer should have been permanently banned a long time ago for the racist crap he spews...

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434015)
I don't recall, it's someone who doesn't post very often.

ok thanks

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434015)
I don't recall, it's someone who doesn't post very often.


Mine are off as well.

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433867)
So just to clarify you don't think what happened to shtsprayer was wrong and no one abused their power?


I too would very much like an answer to this question.

Bugeater 01-28-2009 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5434067)
ok thanks

I found it, it's dtebbe. Here's his avatar:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/custo...atar689_10.gif

and it's titled "A banana for every monkey".

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434079)
I found it, it's dtebbe. Here's his avatar:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/custo...atar689_10.gif

and it's titled "A banana for every monkey".

LMAO That is kind of funny in a disturbing way I guess :)

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5433703)
It wasn't so much the banning as the attitude of; I can do it, I did it, I have my reasons, I don't care what you think.

That's horseshit and you know it.

Nobody came off that way. Patteu framed it up that way.

Iowanian 01-28-2009 12:33 PM

Many of us have donated over the years, but not under those terms.

Personally, I think its a decent concept to allow others to as a group, moderate indecent behavior, however I don't like the idea of a (not all of you) douchebag buying that kind of power. A couple of you are pretty cocky about it.


Personally, I'd rather see the infraction stick handed to mod selected long tenured members.

Buck 01-28-2009 12:36 PM

Iowanian,

I don't donate just so I can have the powers, I donated to donate and later found out that we had the ability to give out warnings for bad posts.

As far as being cocky about it, its human nature to flex your muscles sometimes, everyone does...even you.

Bugeater 01-28-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5434083)
LMAO That is kind of funny in a disturbing way I guess :)

So it's funny when dtebbe does it, but unacceptable when Shtsprayer does it?

Iowanian 01-28-2009 12:38 PM

I don't have a problem with the assistance provided when mods are gone. I have a problem with buying it.

Buck 01-28-2009 12:39 PM

Yeah thats pretty racist no matter which way you look at it, I'm surprised they haven't been asked to change it.

Baby Lee 01-28-2009 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5433703)
It wasn't so much the banning as the attitude of; I can do it, I did it, I have my reasons, I don't care what you think.

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5434085)
That's horseshit and you know it.

Nobody came off that way. Patteu framed it up that way.

.
Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5428065)
Um, read the thread. I wasn't personal until he took it there. As far as your opinion on the matter, it really doesn't matter.

I'm not going to apologize for what I did, nor do I care if it upset any of you. The fact that he slights the mans race with every post he makes offends me. I let him know. Period.

Now, even though I didn't need to, I feel I've defended myself enough on this issue and am done commenting on it.


stevieray 01-28-2009 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434107)
So it's funny when dtebbe does it, but unacceptable when Shtsprayer does it?

exactly why it is horseshit...there are only a handful of people on this board who don't live by double standards..

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434107)
So it's funny when dtebbe does it, but unacceptable when Shtsprayer does it?

I haven't read anything that he has posted that I would find racist or probably more accurately it hasn't caught my attention.

I will go do a search though just to find out.

stevieray 01-28-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5434129)
.

:LOL:

Bugeater 01-28-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5434135)
I haven't read anything that he has posted that I would find racist or probably more accurately it hasn't caught my attention.

I will go do a search though just to find out.

So a racist avatar and tagline is OK as long as he doesn't post something racist?

patteeu 01-28-2009 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5433667)
To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2.

Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong.

On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately.

So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?

I thought they were called "hall monitor" powers.

Relying on actual moderators to ban people posting porn has never been a big issue in the past.

I think it's great that people are donating to ChiefsPlanet. I don't mind those people getting some fringe benefits in return. I think it's a bad idea to have a policy that any yahoo can buy a slice of moderator power, though. There are several people around here who shouldn't be anywhere near the ban button. If we need more people with the ability to flag posts as offensive because our moderators are stretched too thin, then they ought to be selected with an eye toward their temperament and judgment.

One of the big attractions of ChiefsPlanet over other Chiefs message boards or other message boards in general (especially corporate sponsored boards) is the fact that it is lightly moderated. This place is like the wild west of message boards and I think that's a good thing. The lighter the moderation the better, IMO.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434147)
So a racist avatar and tagline is OK as long as he doesn't post something racist?

I didn't say it was ok I just thought it was kind of funny in a disturbing way. Like I said I don't have avatars or sigs turned on so I couldn't see them

Buck 01-28-2009 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 5434155)
I thought they were called "hall monitor" powers.

Relying on actual moderators to ban people posting porn has never been a big issue in the past.

I think it's great that people are donating to ChiefsPlanet. I don't mind those people getting some fringe benefits in return. I think it's a bad idea to have a policy that any yahoo can buy a slice of moderator power, though. There are several people around here who shouldn't be anywhere near the ban button. If we need more people with the ability to flag posts as offensive because our moderators are stretched too thin, then they ought to be selected with an eye toward their temperament and judgment.

One of the big attractions of ChiefsPlanet over other Chiefs message boards or other message boards in general (especially corporate sponsored boards) is the fact that it is lightly moderated. This place is like the wild west of message boards and I think that's a good thing. The lighter the moderation the better, IMO.

I get the vibe from DaFace that if anyone abuses these powers, they can have them taken away quite easily.

I've also gotten the vibe from him that they are helping out the mods in a good way. I don't think anyone has abused them yet.

patteeu 01-28-2009 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5434085)
That's horseshit and you know it.

Nobody came off that way. Patteu framed it up that way.

I was framed! I was framed! LMAO

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-28-2009 12:53 PM

Power should lie solely in the hands of the Administrator. Mods should police, report the offenses, and let Admin. have the final say.

Giving members discretionary powers for the price of a pizza is just plain stupid.

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5434135)
I haven't read anything that he has posted that I would find racist or probably more accurately it hasn't caught my attention.

I will go do a search though just to find out.

I searched his posts from the last 6 months in DC and he has only had 13 posts over there. Nothing objectionable that I could find.

Maybe we should just ask him? Dtebbe are you a racist?

dirk digler 01-28-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 5434155)
I thought they were called "hall monitor" powers.

Relying on actual moderators to ban people posting porn has never been a big issue in the past.

I think it's great that people are donating to ChiefsPlanet. I don't mind those people getting some fringe benefits in return. I think it's a bad idea to have a policy that any yahoo can buy a slice of moderator power, though. There are several people around here who shouldn't be anywhere near the ban button. If we need more people with the ability to flag posts as offensive because our moderators are stretched too thin, then they ought to be selected with an eye toward their temperament and judgment.

One of the big attractions of ChiefsPlanet over other Chiefs message boards or other message boards in general (especially corporate sponsored boards) is the fact that it is lightly moderated. This place is like the wild west of message boards and I think that's a good thing. The lighter the moderation the better, IMO.

I think that is a very very fair take pat and one that is hard to argue against.

patteeu 01-28-2009 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434107)
So it's funny when dtebbe does it, but unacceptable when Shtsprayer does it?

The hall monitors will let you know whether something is funny or not. Of course it will probably depend on whether they think of you as a buddy or, alternatively, they have a grudge against you.

AustinChief 01-28-2009 12:57 PM

Just an fyi, no one (besides mods) has the power to ban... the worst a "supporter" can do is give an infraction... it takes FIVE of those to earn a temp (2 day) ban.

So

patteeu 01-28-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5434213)
Just an fyi, no one (besides mods) has the power to ban... the worst a "supporter" can do is give an infraction... it takes FIVE of those to earn a temp (2 day) ban.

So

If 5 lead to a nearly automatic ban than that's still a problem AFAIC. What SHTSPRAYER was banned for yesterday was a joke compared to other things that are posted on this board with some regularity. He repeated race-related terminology that has been used in and reported by the mainstream media to refer to Obama. For example, the LATimes editorial board didn't consider "Magic Negro" to be unacceptable terminology, and in fact it was used by a mixed race op-ed writer. While he used it to criticize other posters in a fairly vulgar way, that vulgarity was relatively tame by ChiefsPlanet standards.

Buck 01-28-2009 01:09 PM

I cant believe this is such a big stink.

If someone gets so many infractions, they probably deserved it. If not, a mod can reverse it.

Frazod 01-28-2009 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5434213)
Just an fyi, no one (besides mods) has the power to ban... the worst a "supporter" can do is give an infraction... it takes FIVE of those to earn a temp (2 day) ban.

So

Actually, it was three.

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 5434249)
If 5 lead to a nearly automatic ban than that's still a problem AFAIC. What SHTSPRAYER was banned for yesterday was a joke compared to other things that are posted on this board with some regularity. He repeated race-related terminology that has been used in and reported by the mainstream media to refer to Obama. For example, the LATimes editorial board didn't consider "Magic Negro" to be unacceptable terminology, and in fact it was used by a mixed race op-ed writer. While he used it to criticize other posters in a fairly vulgar way, that vulgarity was relatively tame by ChiefsPlanet standards.



LOL, weren't you the one complaining I gave infractions too frequently?

Oh, btw, I was responsible for one of those infractions. The first one. So....get off the drama queen kick. I felt it was inappropriate race attacking language. Nothing to do with politics or even personal opinion. However, I've enjoyed having you try to connect them with that.

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5434263)
I cant believe this is such a big stink.

If someone gets so many infractions, they probably deserved it. If not, a mod can reverse it.

exactly

Frazod 01-28-2009 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434079)
I found it, it's dtebbe. Here's his avatar:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/custo...atar689_10.gif

and it's titled "A banana for every monkey".

FWIW, I don't think this should be allowed. It is in line with the crap Shithead was doing, it is offensive, and the fact that it's allowed here makes us look exactly like the rednecks others try to portray us as. But since it's his avatar and not in something he posted, there's not much I can do about it.

Bugeater 01-28-2009 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5434263)
I cant believe this is such a big stink.

If someone gets so many infractions, they probably deserved it. If not, a mod can reverse it.

I agree for the most part, although I do think there have a been a few instances where someone was too quick with the trigger. I'll only use mine in extreme situations, for anything else I use the "report post" button and let the real mods deal with it.

And I'll never, ever under any circumstances infract someone in DC, I know damn well what I'm in for when I click that link.

AustinChief 01-28-2009 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5434272)
Actually, it was three.

I changed it to 5 :)

Buck 01-28-2009 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434281)
I agree for the most part, although I do think there have a been a few instances where someone was too quick with the trigger. I'll only use mine in extreme situations, for anything else I use the "report post" button and let the real mods deal with it.

And I'll never, ever under any circumstances infract someone in DC, I know damn well what I'm in for when I click that link.

Yeah the first Warning (not infraction) I gave was to DCS. If you recall his sig used to be way too big. I probably shouldn't have given that one.

I gave another one to FMB for being a n00b, but he got me back (both warnings not infractions).

All of the other ones I've given have been for bannable (sp?) offenses only. I think I've only given 2 or 3 infractions (red cards).

OnTheWarpath15 01-28-2009 01:19 PM

Carpet bomb the whole goddamn DC forum, and this is no longer an issue.

People there know it is loosely moderated, if at all, and are constantly pushing further and further to see what they can get away with.

Eliminate DC, and 90% plus of your problems disappear along with it.

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434281)
I agree for the most part, although I do think there have a been a few instances where someone was too quick with the trigger. I'll only use mine in extreme situations, for anything else I use the "report post" button and let the real mods deal with it.

And I'll never, ever under any circumstances infract someone in DC, I know damn well what I'm in for when I click that link.


Agree to disagree. I can tolerate strong opinions on both sides, I can tolerate and quite frequently engage in juvenile attacks and bashing, I can tolerate just about anything. What I can't tolerate is the continued use of race solely to insult, demean, or bash on someone. To me it aint right.

Frazod 01-28-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5434287)
I changed it to 5 :)

Well, that will certainly help patteeu's swelling go down. :thumb:

patteeu 01-28-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5434263)
I cant believe this is such a big stink.

If someone gets so many infractions, they probably deserved it. If not, a mod can reverse it.

The mods shouldn't be moved to take an action that they wouldn't have taken based on their own judgment by a mere 3 (or 5) whiny snitches from a hall monitor, IMO.

Buck 01-28-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5434290)
Carpet bomb the whole goddamn DC forum, and this is no longer an issue.

People there know it is loosely moderated, if at all, and are constantly pushing further and further to see what they can get away with.

Eliminate DC, and 90% plus of your problems disappear along with it.

Everytime I enter the DC forum (Probably less than 10 times since I joined CP) I feel like my head is going to 'splode.

ShortRoundChief 01-28-2009 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5434290)
Carpet bomb the whole goddamn DC forum, and this is no longer an issue.

People there know it is loosely moderated, if at all, and are constantly pushing further and further to see what they can get away with.

Eliminate DC, and 90% plus of your problems disappear along with it.

Yep, and then they come to the main board.
What would be your solution to that?

Buck 01-28-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 5434297)
The mods shouldn't be moved to take an action that they wouldn't have taken based on their own judgment by a mere 3 (or 5) whiny snitches from a hall monitor, IMO.

Not to be too confrontational, but I will be anyways.

What makes you think that a Supporter doesn't understand what the difference is between a bannable and a non-bannable offense?

The rules are pretty clear cut. If you get dinged by a supporter, you probably would get dinged by a mod too. Its just that there aren't that many mods, so they are less likely to catch you.

DaneMcCloud 01-28-2009 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 5434095)
Many of us have donated over the years, but not under those terms.

Personally, I think its a decent concept to allow others to as a group, moderate indecent behavior, however I don't like the idea of a (not all of you) douchebag buying that kind of power. A couple of you are pretty cocky about it.


Personally, I'd rather see the infraction stick handed to mod selected long tenured members.

I agree.

The only way I'd use it would be in the case of someone like Marlboro Chief.

As much as I absolutely despise Shtstrayer and his antics, I wouldn't ban him.

DC brings out the worst in people sometimes.

Me included.

CoMoChief 01-28-2009 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5433997)
And just how much money have you donated to keep this board running?

None, I also don't ask of special support powers or anything like that.

Bugeater 01-28-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 5434289)
Yeah the first Warning (not infraction) I gave was to DCS. If you recall his sig used to be way too big. I probably shouldn't have given that one.

I gave another one to FMB for being a n00b, but he got me back (both warnings not infractions).

All of the other ones I've given have been for bannable (sp?) offenses only. I think I've only given 2 or 3 infractions (red cards).

The one you gave to FMB was obviously a joke, I'm not against anyone using their powers for amusement purposes. I was this >< close to handing some out in that thread as well just to see if it would end up spiraling out of control.

Frazod 01-28-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 5434299)
Yep, and then they come to the main board.
What would be your solution to that?

Exactly. For anybody who wasn't here in the fall of 2004, when in the midst of football season when the Chiefs were still good, you'd find perhaps three football-related threads and all the rest the politicos pissing and moaning about everything under the sun.

DC is a good thing. Well, DC itself isn't, but the fact that it exists is.

CoMoChief 01-28-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 5434079)
I found it, it's dtebbe. Here's his avatar:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/custo...atar689_10.gif

and it's titled "A banana for every monkey".

Obama looks like a monkey, not exactly pointing towards to the racial slang part of it.

Obama literally looks like a monkey i see nothing wrong with this.

HemiEd 01-28-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5433804)
Some will always be more equal than others.

http://madanti.tripod.com/Image25.jpg

:spock::eek:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.