ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   #3 overall pick... a 20 year history (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202012)

AustinChief 02-08-2009 05:27 PM

#3 overall pick... a 20 year history
 
08 Matt Ryan
07 Joe Thomas
06 Vince Young
05 Braylon Edwards
04 Larry Fitzgerald
03 Andre Johnson
02 Joey Harrington
01 Gerard Warren
00 Chris Samuels
99 Akili Smith
98 Andre Wadsworth
97 Shawn Springs
96 Simeon Rice
95 Steve McNair
94 Heath Shuler
93 Garrison Hearst
92 Sean Gilbert
91 Bruce Pickens
90 Cortez Kennedy
89 Barry Sanders


Draw your own conclusions. As for myself, if this list is a good indicator, I would go DT, DE, OT or WR... unfortunately we don't have a need that pressing at OT and the DE, DT WR prospects are iffy that high...

I am not in the anti-QB at all cost crowd.. I just really am not sold on THESE two QBs... esp. Stafford...

The Bad Guy 02-08-2009 05:28 PM

12 out of 20 picks have been really good.

Marco Polo 02-08-2009 05:52 PM

To be honest, this may be the first draft that I really don't have a preference on where we draft yet. Last year I was heavy on OL/DL and that happened. We have a lot of holes on our team so I just want the BPA period.

the Talking Can 02-08-2009 05:54 PM

there are no conclusions to draw

it's just a list of picks....

AustinChief 02-08-2009 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5470021)
there are no conclusions to draw

it's just a list of picks....

the list = data - - - from said data... draw your conclusions...

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 06:11 PM

Three Pro Bowls QB's, one average QB and two awful QB's.

That's a pretty good percentage with the third pick for 15 years.

Saul Good 02-08-2009 06:11 PM

Interesting trend. From this list, we can expect our pick to be young, most likely male, and with some college education.

the Talking Can 02-08-2009 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470038)
the list = data - - - from said data... draw your conclusions...

it is incapable of meaning anything other than "player x was drafted with the 3rd pick"....

not trying to be an ass, but you can't draw any conclusions about the relative merits of drafting a position with the 3rd pick from this...there is no causal relationship between the selection # and the player's success, when limited to a single draft position....

comparing a position to it's success ratio across all rounds of the draft gives you "data" that can be used to draw conclusions....this doesn't

not even sure why i care, so i'll leave you all to your conclusion drawing,,,,

Hootie 02-08-2009 06:19 PM

I think the Talking Can is a total douche bag.

That is all...

doomy3 02-08-2009 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5470054)
Three Pro Bowls QB's, one average QB and two awful QB's.

That's a pretty good percentage with the third pick for 15 years.

I would love to hear how you came to those conclusions...

Who was the average QB?

I guess you would also be happy with a "Pro Bowl" QB like Vince Young too?

And are you anointing Matt Ryan as a Pro Bowl QB?

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470081)
I would love to hear how you came to those conclusions...

Who was the average QB?

I guess you would also be happy with a "Pro Bowl" QB like Vince Young too?

And are you anointing Matt Ryan as a Pro Bowl QB?

Harrington: Average.

McNair: Super Bowl QB, former MVP.

Matt Ryan: Rookie of the year, (short on Pro Bowl in year one).

Vince Young: Pro Bowl 2006.

And who the **** cares anyway? It's just a spot. It's not like it's a "Jinxed" number to picking at or something ridiculous.

doomy3 02-08-2009 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5470112)
Harrington: Average.

McNair: Super Bowl QB, former MVP.

Matt Ryan: Rookie of the year, (short on Pro Bowl in year one).

Vince Young: Pro Bowl 2006.

So, I guess you would be happy with any of those players at #3 then. Is that what you're saying?

Ultra Peanut 02-08-2009 06:49 PM

BUT MOMMY I'M SCAAAAAARED OF DRAFTING A QB

Mecca 02-08-2009 06:53 PM

You know what conclusion I draw from that?

You don't take a OLB with the pick.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470160)
You know what conclusion I draw from that?

You don't take a OLB with the pick.

see, there is a smart conclusion!

Talking Can... there is plenty of data here to draw a number of conclusions...


for example, you don't draft OLB, kicker, punter etc at this position...

milkman 02-08-2009 07:15 PM

The conclusion I can draw from this is that people are scared shitless to draft a QB.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5470215)
The conclusion I can draw from this is that people are scared shitless to draft a QB.

Pretty much, I think as the draft gets closer we'll see the serious fear start to come out.

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470115)
So, I guess you would be happy with any of those players at #3 then. Is that what you're saying?

Thanks for speaking for me. :rolleyes:

I'm saying that four decent picks were made along with two epic busts at QB.

Clear enough for you, Doomy?

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5470215)
The conclusion I can draw from this is that people are scared shitless to draft a QB.



How do you draw that conclusion from those picks?

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5470226)
Thanks for speaking for me. :rolleyes:

I'm saying that four decent picks were made along with two epic busts at QB.

Clear enough for you, Doomy?

Yep, that's what I wanted to know.

I would imagine that out of those 6 picks, that only one or two of them would anyone consider a decent pick at #3. I don't know how anyone could consider Young, Harrington, Schuler or Smith anywhere near good enough for that slot. THey would all be busts.

And this may be the first time ever I have EVER heard Harrington referred to as an average NFL QB.

milkman 02-08-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470227)
How do you draw that conclusion from those picks?

It's being used to support the "I'm not sold on a QB" draft selection.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5470215)
The conclusion I can draw from this is that people are scared shitless to draft a QB.

Nice, can you step off your blanket statements for a sec and read what I wrote?

I am scared of THESE two QBs, I wanted Flacco and Henne last year. I am definitely not against drafting a QB... but junior QBs don't have a great track record... And if you look at the list, QBs at the #3 spot don't either... McNair is the one good QB out of 6.

To be honest I wasn't a big Matt Ryan fan last year, and he will probably work out well.. If it comes to Stafford or Sanchez.. I would take the one with higher upside (Sanchez) but as I said, neither excites me nor have they all season.

So, because I don't like those two players.. I am afraid of drafting a QB?

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:24 PM

If you liked Chad Henne more than these 2 guys I'm going to honestly ask you what the hell you were looking at.

NickAthanFan 02-08-2009 07:24 PM

You can't be a great team without a great QB. That's why we should pick Graham Harrell in the 7th round or so. LMAO

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470243)
Nice, can you step off your blanket statements for a sec and read what I wrote?

I am scared of THESE two QBs, I wanted Flacco and Henne last year. I am definitely not against drafting a QB... but junior QBs don't have a great track record... And if you look at the list, QBs at the #3 spot don't either... McNair is the one good QB out of 6.

To be honest I wasn't a big Matt Ryan fan last year, and he will probably work out well.. If it comes to Stafford or Sanchez.. I would take the one with higher upside (Sanchez) but as I said, neither excites me nor have they all season.

So, because I don't like those two players.. I am afraid of drafting a QB?


Obviously.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:27 PM

I think it's funny that Austin liked the 2 QB's I didn't like at all.

milkman 02-08-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470243)
Nice, can you step off your blanket statements for a sec and read what I wrote?

I am scared of THESE two QBs, I wanted Flacco and Henne last year. I am definitely not against drafting a QB... but junior QBs don't have a great track record... And if you look at the list, QBs at the #3 spot don't either... McNair is the one good QB out of 6.

To be honest I wasn't a big Matt Ryan fan last year, and he will probably work out well.. If it comes to Stafford or Sanchez.. I would take the one with higher upside (Sanchez) but as I said, neither excites me nor have they all season.

So, because I don't like those two players.. I am afraid of drafting a QB?

You are right, it is a blanket statement.

However, if you look at that, one could conclude that if you don't simply throw a QB into the fire immediately, and give him some time to sit and learn, you could allow him to develop into an MVP calibre QB, since the only one of those QBs that really turned into anything was given time to develop.

But then Matt Ryan could debunk that theory.

The fact is, it really is impossible to draw any conclusions from this.

What has happened with QBs selected in the past has no bearing on how these guys will turn out.

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470262)
I think it's funny that Austin liked the 2 QB's I didn't like at all.

I don't think it's that funny at all. There are a lot of people on this board. Of course there are going to be a lot of opinions.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5470239)
It's being used to support the "I'm not sold on a QB" draft selection.

Notice my statement THESE QBs, which you conveniently read as A QB.

And to respond to Mecca, I wanted Flacco a late 1st or Henne with a 2nd... I honestly feel that Sanchez is gonna either be a great pick or a bust at #3... I am leaning toward bust... but if we pick him I hope I am wrong. Stafford I can't stand... just never liked him.

but either way, they bear the curse of the junior QB... hard to overcome.

Again, if Sanchez stayed in school and had another great year and we sucked enough to be able to draft him I would have been elated... as it is, not so much.

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470233)
Yep, that's what I wanted to know.

I would imagine that out of those 6 picks, that only one or two of them would anyone consider a decent pick at #3. I don't know how anyone could consider Young, Harrington, Schuler or Smith anywhere near good enough for that slot. THey would all be busts.

And this may be the first time ever I have EVER heard Harrington referred to as an average NFL QB.

Harrington is not a bust. He played for a shitty team for years. Actually, the worst team in the entire NFL. He's received poor coaching and bounced around but he's still playing and he's still under 30. There's certainly room for him to improve and find his way as an NFL QB. You could have put Rivers, Manning or Rothlisberger on that Lions teams and they would still suck.

I thought Vince Young was taken too high but the owner was enamored with his size, mobility and arm. Before his mental breakdown, he proved me wrong. I think it's way to early to label him a bust, unless he retires from football with mental issues.

Smith sucked. Major reach. Schuler was a joke but the Redskins at least made up with that selection by choosing Gus Ferrote in the 7th.

These comparisons have absolutely ZERO impact on the success or failure of Sanchez or Stafford so basically, this was an exercise in futility.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:30 PM

All I know is everytime I watched Chad Henne play I was thoroughly unimpressed.

And Flacco put up the red flags that I would put up on QB.

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5470274)
Harrington is not a bust. He played for a shitty team for years. Actually, the worst team in the entire NFL. He's received poor coaching and bounced around but he's still playing and he's still under 30. There's certainly room for him to improve and find his way as an NFL QB. You could have put Rivers, Manning or Rothlisberger on that Lions teams and they would still suck.

I thought Vince Young was taken too high but the owner was enamored with his size, mobility and arm. Before his mental breakdown, he proved me wrong. I think it's way to early to label him a bust, unless he retires from football with mental issues.

Smith sucked. Major reach. Schuler was a joke but the Redskins at least made up with that selection by choosing Gus Ferrote in the 7th.

These comparisons have absolutely ZERO impact on the success or failure of Sanchez or Stafford so basically, this was an exercise in futility.


I almost stopped reading there, because I cannot honestly believe you are being serious.

But I actually do agree with your last part.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470275)
All I know is everytime I watched Chad Henne play I was thoroughly unimpressed.

And Flacco put up the red flags that I would put up on QB.

I think Flacco will bear me out and Henne may if he gets any serious playing time... I can't see Pennington staying ahead of him for more than one more year.

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470275)
All I know is everytime I watched Chad Henne play I was thoroughly unimpressed.

And Flacco put up the red flags that I would put up on QB.



Honestly, who cares?

Bill Parcells obviously liked Henne and Newsome liked Flacco. Those are two of the best in the business, so I will trust their judgment over yours.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:35 PM

When a QB goes from 3rd round to 1st round during the combine because he starts showing off his arm he throws up a red flag to me..

I'll still go with that strategy more often that not you'll be right for avoiding them..the Ravens took 2 QB's like that one was a bust the other one looks alright after 1 year, but I also don't think he was as good as some made him out to be.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470283)
Honestly, who cares?

Bill Parcells obviously liked Henne and Newsome liked Flacco. Those are two of the best in the business, so I will trust their judgment over yours.

Yea Ozzie Newsome drafted Kyle Boller too......Baltimore for all of their nice draft picks has had a real hard time with offensive skill players.

And Parcells draft history is really mixed...Bobby Carpenter anyone?

doomy3 02-08-2009 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470287)
When a QB goes from 3rd round to 1st round during the combine because he starts showing off his arm he throws up a red flag to me..

I'll still go with that strategy more often that not you'll be right for avoiding them..the Ravens took 2 QB's like that one was a bust the other one looks alright after 1 year, but I also don't think he was as good as some made him out to be.

This is why I think it's funny that people are ready to anoint Matt Ryan as great after one year.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470298)
This is why I think it's funny that people are ready to anoint Matt Ryan as great after one year.

Well I think Ryan was significantly better than Flacco this past season...

AustinChief 02-08-2009 07:48 PM

and to be honest, this list was supposed to be about more than just ONE position at that pick....

Our team won't collapse if we don't pick a [insert pet position here] this year.

Mecca 02-08-2009 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470331)
and to be honest, this list was supposed to be about more than just ONE position at that pick....

Our team won't collapse if we don't pick a [insert pet position here] this year.

Well this ties into my thread about next years draft, odds are this team will have a top 10 pick next year..

Well if we don't go QB this year who the hell is there next year at QB? I'm not seeing anything..

However I see 2 possible elite DE prospects and 2 of the best safety prospects ever.

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470278)
I almost stopped reading there, because I cannot honestly believe you are being serious.

But I actually do agree with your last part.

Akili Smith was a bust.

Jim Druckenmiller was a bust.

Ryan Leaf was a bust.

Cade McNown was a bust.

Joey Harrington is still playing in the NFL and has won some games. He got completely screwed over in Detroit (who hasn't?).

I'm not going to say the guy is anything better than average but Sean Payton's got him on his roster so that definitely says a little bit about the guy.

The guy's got nearly 15,000 yards passing and a QB rating of 69.1 while playing on shitty ****ing teams (Detroit, Miami & Atlanta).

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470298)
This is why I think it's funny that people are ready to anoint Matt Ryan as great after one year.

Matt Ryan WAS great after one year.

How can you dispute that? Do you honestly believe that he will suddenly suck?

AustinChief 02-08-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470337)
Well this ties into my thread about next years draft, odds are this team will have a top 10 pick next year..

Well if we don't go QB this year who the hell is there next year at QB? I'm not seeing anything..

However I see 2 possible elite DE prospects and 2 of the best safety prospects ever.

I don't see anyone yet either... but that doesn't mean you reach this year. it means you suck it up and go BPA.

Can you name me ONE junior QB who didn't suck? And don't name Big Ben, #1 I don't think he is that good and #2 he was a 4 year junior with 38 starts....

Ebolapox 02-08-2009 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470247)
If you liked Chad Henne more than these 2 guys I'm going to honestly ask you what the hell you were looking at.

kyle went to/graduated from michigan. does his henne love really shock you?

doomy3 02-08-2009 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5470341)
Matt Ryan WAS great after one year.

How can you dispute that? Do you honestly believe that he will suddenly suck?

No, I don't believe he will suck. But there are plenty of one year wonders that flame out.

Look no further than your Pro Bowl QB at the number 3 spot, Vince Young.

doomy3 02-08-2009 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5470338)
Akili Smith was a bust.

Jim Druckenmiller was a bust.

Ryan Leaf was a bust.

Cade McNown was a bust.

Joey Harrington is still playing in the NFL and has won some games. He got completely screwed over in Detroit (who hasn't?).

I'm not going to say the guy is anything better than average but Sean Payton's got him on his roster so that definitely says a little bit about the guy.

The guy's got nearly 15,000 yards passing and a QB rating of 69.1 while playing on shitty ****ing teams (Detroit, Miami & Atlanta).


He was a number 3 pick in the draft, and has been a backup for over half of his career. That is the definition of bust. Ryan Sims is on an NFL roster, so clearly he is not a bust either.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 5470389)
kyle went to/graduated from michigan. does his henne love really shock you?

Ha, true enough... BUT I am not a fan of EVERY ex U-M QB... just saw 4 solid years from Henne and felt he would be a good QB at the pro level... not a GREAT QB... a good solid starter.

Sam Hall 02-08-2009 08:27 PM

In other words, the No. 3 pick has either been boom or bust. I wouldn't be surprised if the other top 5 spots are the same way.

Ebolapox 02-08-2009 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470405)
Ha, true enough... BUT I am not a fan of EVERY ex U-M QB... just saw 4 solid years from Henne and felt he would be a good QB at the pro level... not a GREAT QB... a good solid starter.

at this point, I'm sick to ****ing death of 'good, solid starters.' for every year save 1.5 of my 20 year fandom, I've never seen the chiefs with a franchise QB. a guy who could take the team on his back. the 1.5 years I saw it, we went further into the playoffs than we had since the early 70's.

I believe it's worth gambling (which won't be MUCH of a gamble if pioli is all that he's been anointed as) to get that high upside guy (sanchez or stafford)... you draft either (I'd prefer stafford--he's been nails every time I've seen him, but sanchez may have a higher ceiling) and let him sit for at least a year and learn the ropes. you know, get a competant QB coach and offensive coordinator, build the offense around him, and put him in situations where he can build his confidence.

anyway, I digress. the absolute abject fear of QBs around here is baffling. you'd think that everybody would be sick to death of other teams having that guy and shredding us. remember the 90's? just take a look at who beat us in the playoffs. every playoff loss this decade? peyton ****ing manning. srsly. when's it gonna be our turn to have that franchise guy to rip OTHER people's hearts out?

AustinChief 02-08-2009 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 5470430)
at this point, I'm sick to ****ing death of 'good, solid starters.' for every year save 1.5 of my 20 year fandom, I've never seen the chiefs with a franchise QB. a guy who could take the team on his back. the 1.5 years I saw it, we went further into the playoffs than we had since the early 70's.

I believe it's worth gambling (which won't be MUCH of a gamble if pioli is all that he's been anointed as) to get that high upside guy (sanchez or stafford)... you draft either (I'd prefer stafford--he's been nails every time I've seen him, but sanchez may have a higher ceiling) and let him sit for at least a year and learn the ropes. you know, get a competant QB coach and offensive coordinator, build the offense around him, and put him in situations where he can build his confidence.

anyway, I digress. the absolute abject fear of QBs around here is baffling. you'd think that everybody would be sick to death of other teams having that guy and shredding us. remember the 90's? just take a look at who beat us in the playoffs. every playoff loss this decade? peyton ****ing manning. srsly. when's it gonna be our turn to have that franchise guy to rip OTHER people's hearts out?

Just as I am tired of hearing about "upside" and "potential" ..

I have no problem taking risks... but the odds are stacked HEAVILY against a junior QB succeeding... what makes either of these two any different?

With the amazing failure rate of junior QBs... I can't imagine it is just coincidence....



Take a look at a PARTIAL list.... (Big Ben had 38 starts so he is a bit of an exception) This is a list of guys that teams "gambled" on... Junior QBs are the SUCKER bet of the draft... If you still want to take that gamble.. I would advise staying away from Vegas, that town was built off bad math....

Ben Roethlisberger, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Alex Smith, Rex Grossman, Todd Marinovich, Andre Ware, Tommy Maddox, Rick Mirer, Heath Shuler, Vince Young, Byron Leftwich, and Michael Vick ... Iguess you could squeeze Aaron Rodgers inthat list... but he was a JuCo transfer so I don't consider him the same as the "true" juniors...

kstater 02-08-2009 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470468)
Just as I am tired of hearing about "upside" and "potential" ..

I have no problem taking risks... but the odds are stacked HEAVILY against a junior QB succeeding... what makes either of these two any different?

With the amazing failure rate of junior QBs... I can't imagine it is just coincidence....



Take a look at a PARTIAL list.... (Big Ben had 38 starts so he is a bit of an exception) This is a list of guys that teams "gambled" on... Junior QBs are the SUCKER bet of the draft... If you still want to take that gamble.. I would advise staying away from Vegas, that town was built off bad math....

Ben Roethlisberger, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Alex Smith, Rex Grossman, Todd Marinovich, Andre Ware, Tommy Maddox, Rick Mirer, Heath Shuler, Vince Young, Byron Leftwich, and Michael Vick ... Iguess you could squeeze Aaron Rodgers inthat list... but he was a JuCo transfer so I don't consider him the same as the "true" juniors...

I see your point, but I think we're going to stop seeing the great QB prospects staying 4 years. There's so much money nowadays that it's not worth a QB to go back. I think the list of successful junior QB's is going to start to grow.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5470472)
I see your point, but I think we're going to stop seeing the great QB prospects staying 4 years. There's so much money nowadays that it's not worth a QB to go back. I think the list of successful junior QB's is going to start to grow.

I agree, just not sure I want to be on the bleeding edge of that trend. and honestly, I just don't like the two choices we have at this point. Maybe that will change but not right now...

Ebolapox 02-08-2009 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470468)
Just as I am tired of hearing about "upside" and "potential" ..

I have no problem taking risks... but the odds are stacked HEAVILY against a junior QB succeeding... what makes either of these two any different?

With the amazing failure rate of junior QBs... I can't imagine it is just coincidence....



Take a look at a PARTIAL list.... (Big Ben had 38 starts so he is a bit of an exception) This is a list of guys that teams "gambled" on... Junior QBs are the SUCKER bet of the draft... If you still want to take that gamble.. I would advise staying away from Vegas, that town was built off bad math....

Ben Roethlisberger, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Alex Smith, Rex Grossman, Todd Marinovich, Andre Ware, Tommy Maddox, Rick Mirer, Heath Shuler, Vince Young, Byron Leftwich, and Michael Vick ... Iguess you could squeeze Aaron Rodgers inthat list... but he was a JuCo transfer so I don't consider him the same as the "true" juniors...

oh, it's absolutely not a coincidence that jr. qbs tend to bust more often than not. the issue with junior qbs is that they're often drafted by teams that suck and have to start from day one.

a while back, I did a bit of research of first round qbs relative to where they were drafted, and whether they played right off the bat or sat on the bench and learned the ropes. overwhelmingly, the guys who were eased into the lineup were those with the greatest success. you can look at almost every qb on your list, and they mostly played right off the bat.

my take is that, in a perfect world, you draft the senior qb that started 40 games, had a high completion percentage, and played in a pro style offense. this isn't a perfect world. we have stafford and sanchez, who have flashed the ability to be that franchise qb we've lacked, really, since len dawson. and unfortunately, that's what the draft is all about. picking young guys with talent and upside. luckily, we have one of the best guys in the nfl doing the picking for us now. if we draft a qb at number three overall, I have all the confidence in the world that pioli will put him in the position to succeed.

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470392)
No, I don't believe he will suck. But there are plenty of one year wonders that flame out.

Look no further than your Pro Bowl QB at the number 3 spot, Vince Young.

So, you think there's a 50/50 chance that Matt Ryan will have deep emotional and psychological problems?

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470403)
He was a number 3 pick in the draft, and has been a backup for over half of his career. That is the definition of bust. Ryan Sims is on an NFL roster, so clearly he is not a bust either.

No, it's not.

THE definition of a bust is Ryan Leaf

The definition of a bust is Akili Smith.

The definition of a bust is Cade McNown.

Do you think that Jim Plunkett was a "bust"? He was number one overall in pick in 1971, yet by 1978, he was a backup QB for the Raiders.

Of course all he did after that was win the Super Bowl in 1981 and 1983.

I'm not predicting future greatness for Joey Harrington but stranger things have happened.

cdcox 02-08-2009 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470304)
Well I think Ryan was significantly better than Flacco this past season...

Not even a question about this.

Do people ever look beyond W-L and stats? I'm as big a stat guy as anyone on the board, but I at least try to evaluate a player on what they do on the field.

I called Chad Pennington "not suitable" after the 2002 season, because I didn't like his weak arm. He had great numbers that year and a playoff win. However, I wrote him off as a championship caliber QB because he could not throw all the passes. You get a good defense in the playoffs and Chad isn't going to deliver. I stick by that assessment to this day.

Mecca 02-08-2009 10:56 PM

My opinion of QB's right now is that just being from a pro style offense puts them ahead of where most QB's are, the college spread fixation is hurting the QB transitions to the next level..

And Sanchez isn't a true junior by the way.

cdcox 02-08-2009 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470392)
No, I don't believe he will suck. But there are plenty of one year wonders that flame out.

Look no further than your Pro Bowl QB at the number 3 spot, Vince Young.

Vince Young had a 51.5% completion rate in is Pro Bowl year. He made the Pro Bowl due to some crazy comebacks. But a 51.5% completion rate is not a sustainable way to win the NFL. Doesn't take a genius to see that. He was actually better in 2007. Then he went batshit crazy in 2008. If he can get his head together (extremely doubtful) he still has a chance.

Matt Ryan's rookie non-Pro-Bowl year shows much, much more promise than VY's pro-bowl year. Matt Ryan's way of winning is based on strong fundamental play. VY's winning in 2006, was based on miracle comebacks that are non-sustainable without strong fundamentals.

Mecca 02-08-2009 11:01 PM

It's nice to see Vince Young prove to be what I thought he was...I never thought he could legit play QB in the NFL at an even average level.

DaneMcCloud 02-08-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470785)
It's nice to see Vince Young prove to be what I thought he was...I never thought he could legit play QB in the NFL at an even average level.

But it didn't happen the way you thought it would (me, either).

The guy has serious emotional and psychological issues that have nothing to due with football.

And, his career is far from over. If history teaches us anything, it's that quarterbacks can comeback and play well at nearly anytime before 40.

AustinChief 02-08-2009 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470773)
My opinion of QB's right now is that just being from a pro style offense puts them ahead of where most QB's are, the college spread fixation is hurting the QB transitions to the next level..

And Sanchez isn't a true junior by the way.

OK, but he has only started what... 16 games? I am hoping he is a badass and we get him etc etc... I just don't BELIEVE it right now...

Mecca 02-08-2009 11:28 PM

Let me break this down real fast...

Would you personally feel more comfortable with a player who spent 4 years in a pro style offense at one of the best colleges in the nation, that can play from center, has good footwork, good mechanics, a very good arm, mobility, intangibles all that. He only started 1 year but don't overlook that he had 4 years of development with a team that has as competitive of practices as anyone..

Or would you rather have someone like Colt McCoy who has started a ton of games but it's in the spread formation...

I'd tell you in my opinion Sanchez is more ready than McCoy, Bradford, any spread QB.

doomy3 02-08-2009 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5470778)
Vince Young had a 51.5% completion rate in is Pro Bowl year. He made the Pro Bowl due to some crazy comebacks. But a 51.5% completion rate is not a sustainable way to win the NFL. Doesn't take a genius to see that. He was actually better in 2007. Then he went batshit crazy in 2008. If he can get his head together (extremely doubtful) he still has a chance.

Matt Ryan's rookie non-Pro-Bowl year shows much, much more promise than VY's pro-bowl year. Matt Ryan's way of winning is based on strong fundamental play. VY's winning in 2006, was based on miracle comebacks that are non-sustainable without strong fundamentals.

I know this. That's why it's insane to pretend that he was a nice pick at #3 and to play him up as a Pro Bowl QB. That's such an abomination.

Almost as bad as calling Joey Harrington an average NFL QB.

Manila-Chief 02-08-2009 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470270)
but either way, they bear the curse of the junior QB... hard to overcome.

Again, if Sanchez stayed in school and had another great year and we sucked enough to be able to draft him I would have been elated... as it is, not so much.

If he does have the talent, intelligence, mental make up, desire, etc. ... to be a QBOTF, it seems to me being a junior will not matter. The staying in school another year will only help the talent evaluator. It seems to me that if he has the tools he can develop.

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470283)
Honestly, who cares?

Bill Parcells obviously liked Henne and Newsome liked Flacco. Those are two of the best in the business, so I will trust their judgment over yours.

How do we know that Parcells didn't like Flacco? Did he have a chance to draft him? IIRC Flacco went in the 1st. round and Henne in the 2nd.???? It's true Newsome had a chance to draft either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 5470430)
at this point, I'm sick to ****ing death of 'good, solid starters.' for every year save 1.5 of my 20 year fandom, I've never seen the chiefs with a franchise QB. a guy who could take the team on his back. the 1.5 years I saw it, we went further into the playoffs than we had since the early 70's.

I believe it's worth gambling (which won't be MUCH of a gamble if pioli is all that he's been anointed as) to get that high upside guy (sanchez or stafford)... you draft either (I'd prefer stafford--he's been nails every time I've seen him, but sanchez may have a higher ceiling) and let him sit for at least a year and learn the ropes. you know, get a competant QB coach and offensive coordinator, build the offense around him, and put him in situations where he can build his confidence.

anyway, I digress. the absolute abject fear of QBs around here is baffling. you'd think that everybody would be sick to death of other teams having that guy and shredding us. remember the 90's? just take a look at who beat us in the playoffs. every playoff loss this decade? peyton ****ing manning. srsly. when's it gonna be our turn to have that franchise guy to rip OTHER people's hearts out?

After reading the article about DeBurg teaching QB's, I think the real question should be if the newly drafted QB's get the coaching/teaching that will help them be a success.

I agree, if Pioli thinks the QB that falls to us is worthy of our pick, I'm more than willing to support him drafting the QB. Why, a top quality QB makes it easier for a team to win and can lead us for the next dozen years. Usually, top draft picks have more talent, which helps him be successful.

cdcox 02-08-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470848)
I know this. That's why it's insane to pretend that he was a nice pick at #3 and to play him up as a Pro Bowl QB. That's such an abomination.

Almost as bad as calling Joey Harrington an average NFL QB.

Gotcha.

Buehler445 02-08-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470840)
Let me break this down real fast...

Would you personally feel more comfortable with a player who spent 4 years in a pro style offense at one of the best colleges in the nation, that can play from center, has good footwork, good mechanics, a very good arm, mobility, intangibles all that. He only started 1 year but don't overlook that he had 4 years of development with a team that has as competitive of practices as anyone..

Or would you rather have someone like Colt McCoy who has started a ton of games but it's in the spread formation...

I'd tell you in my opinion Sanchez is more ready than McCoy, Bradford, any spread QB.

Quick one for you Mecca, which would you rather have Stafford or Sanchez? Don't give me any crap about who Detroit is taking, staff, team, all that other shit. Which is the best prospect in your opinion?

I want Sanchez.

Mecca 02-08-2009 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 5470895)
Quick one for you Mecca, which would you rather have Stafford or Sanchez? Don't give me any crap about who Detroit is taking, staff, team, all that other shit. Which is the best prospect in your opinion?

I want Sanchez.

I'd probably give a slight lean to Sanchez...he is more accurate but his arm isn't quite as good but you don't need a rocket launcher to be a good QB.

doomy3 02-08-2009 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manila-Chief (Post 5470884)
If he does have the talent, intelligence, mental make up, desire, etc. ... to be a QBOTF, it seems to me being a junior will not matter. The staying in school another year will only help the talent evaluator. It seems to me that if he has the tools he can develop.



How do we know that Parcells didn't like Flacco? Did he have a chance to draft him? IIRC Flacco went in the 1st. round and Henne in the 2nd.???? It's true Newsome had a chance to draft either.



After reading the article about DeBurg teaching QB's, I think the real question should be if the newly drafted QB's get the coaching/teaching that will help them be a success.

I agree, if Pioli thinks the QB that falls to us is worthy of our pick, I'm more than willing to support him drafting the QB. Why, a top quality QB makes it easier for a team to win and can lead us for the next dozen years. Usually, top draft picks have more talent, which helps him be successful.


Maybe you missed the whole conversation that post was in reference to...

I didn't say anything about Parcells not liking Flacco. I was just pointing out that two of the brightest minds in football liked those 2 QBs who Mecca didn't, and that I would probably trust their judgement over his.

AustinChief 02-09-2009 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470840)
Let me break this down real fast...

Would you personally feel more comfortable with a player who spent 4 years in a pro style offense at one of the best colleges in the nation, that can play from center, has good footwork, good mechanics, a very good arm, mobility, intangibles all that. He only started 1 year but don't overlook that he had 4 years of development with a team that has as competitive of practices as anyone..

Or would you rather have someone like Colt McCoy who has started a ton of games but it's in the spread formation...

I'd tell you in my opinion Sanchez is more ready than McCoy, Bradford, any spread QB.

Would rather have neither. BPA and that is it... I just don't trust junior QBs... end of story... I may be proven wrong this year... but so far the evidence is heavily in my favor....

I would rather trade for a YOUNG QB... I don't mind drafting a QB (see last year) but just not ready for the TOTAL leap of faith that comes with drafting a JUNIOR QB...

AustinChief 02-09-2009 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470901)
I'd probably give a slight lean to Sanchez...he is more accurate but his arm isn't quite as good but you don't need a rocket launcher to be a good QB.

Ok, I agree 100% here... taking a junior QB is a huge risk... if you are gonna take that risk.. go with a guy like Sanchez.

If I am wrong (hopefully) he could really blow things up...



Also, I am not even sure that Stafford has that MUCH better of an arm...

Buehler445 02-09-2009 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5470901)
I'd probably give a slight lean to Sanchez...he is more accurate but his arm isn't quite as good but you don't need a rocket launcher to be a good QB.

Cool. Thanks.

I don't really have any basis for it, but the few times I saw Stafford, I was not terribly impressed.

But I wasn't impressed with Ryan either.

Shutting up now.

Manila-Chief 02-09-2009 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470906)
Maybe you missed the whole conversation that post was in reference to...

I didn't say anything about Parcells not liking Flacco. I was just pointing out that two of the brightest minds in football liked those 2 QBs who Mecca didn't, and that I would probably trust their judgement over his.

Okay! That's a better explanation!!! And, I agree.

Manila-Chief 02-09-2009 12:24 AM

First, I’m smart enough to know that scouts evaluate college players much better than I do and I know I may be wrong. As of right now if I were making the #3 pick, I’d choose Sanchez. He seems to have the tools, has leadership skills, and I like his potential to continue developing into a great NFL QB.

DeezNutz 02-09-2009 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470942)
Ok, I agree 100% here... taking a junior QB is a huge risk... if you are gonna take that risk.. go with a guy like Sanchez.

If I am wrong (hopefully) he could really blow things up...



Also, I am not even sure that Stafford has that MUCH better of an arm...

I don't know why you're so hung about about the "junior" status.

Stafford has started more collegiate games in the best defensive conference in the country than a ton of seniors.

Thus, from here on out we'll call him a "senior" based on his NFL development. Feel better? Same thing with Sanchez. Dude is really a "senior."

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain (pretend you're a devoted WPI subscriber).

DaneMcCloud 02-09-2009 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5470848)
Almost as bad as calling Joey Harrington an average NFL QB.


Who, in your "infinite wisdom" is an AVERAGE NFL QB?

Don't EVEN like this shit is rocket-science and can be explained by statistics alone.

Are you a Thigpen supporter?

ChiefsCountry 02-09-2009 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5470468)
Take a look at a PARTIAL list.... (Big Ben had 38 starts so he is a bit of an exception) This is a list of guys that teams "gambled" on... Junior QBs are the SUCKER bet of the draft... If you still want to take that gamble.. I would advise staying away from Vegas, that town was built off bad math....

Ben Roethlisberger, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Alex Smith, Rex Grossman, Todd Marinovich, Andre Ware, Tommy Maddox, Rick Mirer, Heath Shuler, Vince Young, Byron Leftwich, and Michael Vick ... Iguess you could squeeze Aaron Rodgers inthat list... but he was a JuCo transfer so I don't consider him the same as the "true" juniors...

Leaf - spread
Couch - spread/Mike Leach
Smith - spread
Grossman - Spurrier's Fun N Gun
Ware - Run N Shoot
Young - Spread
Vick - Option

RustShack 02-09-2009 02:36 AM

Seems like a good pick for a WR :hmmm:

Don't show Haley or Piolis this list!

AustinChief 02-09-2009 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5470997)
I don't know why you're so hung about about the "junior" status.

Stafford has started more collegiate games in the best defensive conference in the country than a ton of seniors.

Thus, from here on out we'll call him a "senior" based on his NFL development. Feel better? Same thing with Sanchez. Dude is really a "senior."

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain (pretend you're a devoted WPI subscriber).

Stafford has started alot of game.. just not impressed.. Sanchez I AM impressed with but... 16 games? Sorry, but the STATS are on my side... I am perfectly willing to be wrong... but so far.. no one has made a halfway decent argument as to WHY I am....

AustinChief 02-09-2009 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5471041)
Leaf - spread
Couch - spread/Mike Leach
Smith - spread
Grossman - Spurrier's Fun N Gun
Ware - Run N Shoot
Young - Spread
Vick - Option

and your point is?

ok, half of my not even close to complete list were "gimmick" college players... I can add another 4 or 5 that weren't.... the argument is... what JUNIORS have succeeded in the NFL... maybe I am wrong and it is now TIME for JUNIORS to succeed... but HISTORY shows otherwise so far...

ANYONE have a valid statistical argument to contradict me?

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-09-2009 04:44 AM

What suprizes me is that there have been no kickers or punters drafted #3


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.