![]() |
The True Fans Have Launched a Counter-Offensive
This ****ing shit is wearing me out. All this pro-Curry, pro-6th round QB bullshit needs to be put down.
|
Good luck with that.
|
Get over yourself.
|
Yeah....good luck. It's not going to end and the arguments against taking a QB are just going to get worse the closer it gets to the draft.
I'm awaiting the meltdown that happens if we take Sanchez or Stafford at #3. |
"True Fans"...instant neg rep
|
Quote:
|
Another thread yapping about the supposed root of the problem.
Here's an idea: STFU and use the ignore tool for every "true fan" you encounter. Remember Hootie? Me neither, after I exterminated the twat with my ignore tool. |
It's whac-a-mole. The True Fans will just keep coming until everyone else just gives up from exhaustion.
|
Quote:
I can beat up all the third graders in the yard. It's like the Seinfeld episode where Kramer gets the blackbelt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This would be a meltdown of HISTORIC proportions:
* Stafford and Sanchez both available * Chiefs draft Orakpo (oh no, Teicher is right!) * Chiefs draft Davis in Round 2 (OH NOOHNO, Whitlock is right?!) I don't think it will happen, but if it did, wouldn't Kansas City go into China Syndrome? |
Quote:
Not sure what they're going to do at #3, but if the Chiefs were to take Nate Davis at the top of round 2, for example, I could see some head scratching, but most giving Pioli and co. the benefit of the doubt. The QB situation has to be answered, and it will be. It's not a matter of "if," but "how." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
OTW has provided some positive info. about Davis in the past, for example. You want meltdown, that would be Smith in round 1 and Freeman in round 2. All the Pioli love would be over. |
Quote:
But then you won't see me make any negative comments either, and if Pioli passes on Stafford/Sanchez, I'll be disppointed, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt if he takes one of those two (Davis/Freeman) in the 2nd. |
Quote:
Myself and Duncan Idaho are his biggest fans on the board. Freeman is a conversation not worth having. Even being a big Davis fan, I'm not sure he's the type of guy that can win you a championship, and that's the whole point. I wouldn't be absolutely devastated of they took Davis like some guys would, but I'd be far from thrilled either. |
I haven't really seen much of Davis, certainly not enough to really comment on him one way or another. However, I've seen enough of Freeman that I don't really want him.
|
Quote:
That would be glorious to witness. (Until the games started) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyone here have photoshop skills?
|
Quote:
|
I posted this in another thread, and I'm going to continue to post it until it sinks in.
Quote:
|
Who wants a sixth round quarterback?
Just wondering. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
rinse and repeat as many times needed |
HERE YE HERE YE!!
Only approved subjects will be discussed on the Red planet! 1st approved subject: Is Sanchez hair A Luxurious or mearly B Silky smooth Your right, this will be much more fun....:thumb: |
Here's the point a lot of people are missing.
Just because you draft a QB in the 1st doesnt necessarily mean you have your franchise QB. In a perfect world yes. Its not that cut and dried. |
Quote:
You can not have this huge fear of it because you need one. I'd seriously rather have to take a top 5 QB twice than have Aaron Curry and some game manager QB that leads us to playoff losses. |
Quote:
|
I'm not telling you to draft for need I'm telling you it's not smart to overdraft an undervalued position.
If Aaron Curry goes with the 3rd pick he's going to be the highest paid OLB in the game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they take Orakpo I will lose my mind. |
Quote:
|
Most of my friends aren't into football or any sports for that matter, that's primarily why I joined The Planet, so I don't talk much football when I'm out. So last night I meet up with my girlfriend and some of her co-workers and I sit with these 2 self proclaimed biggest Chiefs fans in the city. Both these guys where shitting themselves at the thought of drafting a QB at #3. I got everything from trade for Cassel to move Pollard to LB cuz he brings the wood to we got to fix the right side of the line in rd. 1 to **** Carl for trading JA. I couldn't take it any longer and just zoned it out. I'm thinking there maybe something to this tr00 fan thing. It was like watching 2 short bus kids doing an interpretive dance to The Planet.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But no way am I convinced that Sanchez, playing behind that OL, for one season, can be construed as the best player available at 3. I hope like hell whomever they draft, QB or not, turns out to be worth it, but Sanchez? Oh thats right, he played at USC in a pro style offense, done, sign him, championship. I also get it that the QBOF needs to be on this team soon, very soon. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But as you know, I am sure no expert on great play, having spent most of my viewing hours watching the Chiefs. Do you think he is cool under pressure? To me that is the key, more than measurables. |
Quote:
To me, it's his poise, composure and leadership that makes him the prospect I think he is. I've seen about 6 or 7 Georgia games, and I'm in the minority here, but I like Sanchez more than Stafford, specifically because of those intangibles. But I'd take either at 3. |
Why do I keep hearing the, "First round quarterback isn't a sure thing. We shouldn't risk it" arguement? That's about equal to George Lucas saying, "You know, this Star Wars thing might fail. I probably shouldn't try it."
|
FACT: Other than Stafford, there is no other QB coming out in this draft that is worth the #3 overall pick.
FACT: Other than a LT, no other player I can think of is worth the #3 overall pick. FACT: Best scenario for the Chiefs right now is to trade down. |
Quote:
ROFL Might want to crack open your dictionary and revisit the definition of the word "fact." |
Quote:
|
Anyone who thinks the Chiefs are beyond drafting the best player available has not been watching them play and there is nothing wrong with drating Curry or whom ever is Stafford is gone:D
|
Quote:
|
I'd like to know why Stafford was inconsistent with his accuracy. I know he throws off his back foot sometimes, but I have no idea if that is why he at times way overthrew WRs. If it is a coaching/mechanics issue I think Stafford would be the better QB. If it is mental then Sanchez might be the better long term prospect.
Questions with Sanchez - experience, hasn't had to come from behind and is surrounded by lots of talent, seems to get happy feet a little, I think he holds the ball a little low once he starts dancing around, doesn't have a great arm but has better touch than Stafford. Questions about Stafford - great arm strength but he needs to put better touch on short passes (kind of like Croyle), some accuracy and decision making questions but it's hard to determine if it was him or inexperienced offensive players around him, might not be as good of a leader as Sanchez. |
Quote:
You could literally go sign Karlos Dansby for less money than Curry will get if he's picked 3rd. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I like Jenkins. I just like Curry better. Just my oppinion, but we have 2 up and coming young corners and even average CB's can look a lot better with a strong front 7. I know that Curry didnt do a lot of pass rushing and we'll have to get more push up front, but we cant solve all of our problems in one pick. Here's why I like Curry IF we dont go QB. We dont tackle well. Curry is an excellent tackler. We dont have attitude on D. Curry is a big hitter. We dont stop the run. Curry plays the gaps well and is stout against the run. He also had `15 tackles behind the line last year. We dont have playmakers. He had 3 ints for TD's last year. There's just an intangeable there to be around the ball and do something with it. We are old and get injured a lot at LB. Curry hasnt missed any time in 4 years at college. Now dont get me wrong on this next statement but, the big dig has been that Curry doesnt have the sack numbers. I would submit this: Ray Lewis is probably the Best LB in the league and is the heart of a great Defense. Ray hasnt had more than 3.5 sacks since he had 4 in '97. I'm not saying he's Ray, I'm just saying that you dont have to be the guy getting sacks to have a huge impact on a D. Ray wouldnt be Ray if guys werent putting pressure on the QB up front either, but there are some of the same qualities and i think poor LB play has been the major problem with our D. Anyway, that is my thought process. Fire away.:D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So yes, the argument why are you going to make Curry the highest paid LB in the NFL applies to other positions as well. |
Mcshay has us taking Curry in his mock.
lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sanchezites are slinging the BS on every topic these days. Top draft picks don't get paid more than good vets at their respective positions, USC doesn't have any talent on offense, Sanchez has no weaknesses, etc.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://sidesalad.net/archives/ChesterCheetah.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.