ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Who finds success in the 3-4? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202657)

cmh6476 02-18-2009 12:38 PM

Who finds success in the 3-4?
 
check all that apply. Interested to see who you guys have faith in. And think of this as a role on either the DL or at LB. Pollard only counts if you see him moving closer to the line.

cmh6476 02-18-2009 12:40 PM

fock, went to all this trouble and left off McBride :wall:


what I'm curious to see, is how many players people actually think we have in the waiting to start at the 7 various positions...

Consistent1 02-18-2009 12:45 PM

I think it will be Curry. Haha, had to say it for Mecca and the QB crew.

ChiefsCountry 02-18-2009 12:46 PM

McBride

cmh6476 02-18-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Consistent1 (Post 5504086)
I think it will be Curry. Haha, had to say it for Mecca and the QB crew.

no question, there will be holes to fill. We will have opportunities both via the draft and free agency. I think the question becomes, who do we already have that could be good enough to work around? I'm not too sure that anybody is a guarantee at this point, which really means our front office has a lot of evaluation to do in the next month.

CoMoChief 02-18-2009 12:52 PM

Curry, no doubt.

The Chiefs will NOT select Mark Sanchez. COUNT ON IT.

cmh6476 02-18-2009 12:52 PM

what would our starters look like if we had to play tomorrow?

Williams.....Tyler.....Dorsey.....McBride.....Hali
..................Pollard.....Johnson..................


:shrug:

Emo_Channel_Rick 02-18-2009 01:02 PM

DJ most definately.

Frosty 02-18-2009 01:06 PM

I wonder if Brian Johnston would do well as an OLB in this scheme? IIRC, he was a bit light for a RDE but was supposed to be a good pass rusher.

DeezNutz 02-18-2009 01:07 PM

Players not listed in this poll.

Mr. Laz 02-18-2009 01:12 PM

n00b poll FTL

talastan 02-18-2009 02:30 PM

Curry.....McBride.....Tank.....Dorsey.....Johnson
..................FA or Draft.....FA or Draft.............
Flowers.......Pollard.............Morgan............Carr

Nickel: Legget

58-4ever 02-18-2009 02:32 PM

Tank, Pollard (could be Polamalu-like in the right scheme), Flowers, DJ... maybe a few others, but these are the big ones.

Mr. Kotter 02-18-2009 02:49 PM

If the Chiefs go 3-4....the odds of selecting Curry in the first just went up.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2009 02:52 PM

Aaron Curry is not a pass rusher, at all. He's a cover backer.

He's Derrick Brooks or Patrick Willis (only if they weren't nearly as good). He's not James Harrison or Lawrence Taylor.

3-4 OLB is in no way at all similar to 4-3 OLB.

And according to the above poll, the correct answer is none.

Mr. Kotter 02-18-2009 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5504405)
Aaron Curry is not a pass rusher, at all. He's a cover backer.

He's Derrick Brooks or Patrick Willis (only if they weren't nearly as good). He's not James Harrison or Lawrence Taylor.

3-4 OLB is in no way at all similar to 4-3 OLB.

And according to the above poll, the correct answer is none.

I'm thinking they envision having Curry hit the weights, and put him in the middle. He'd be a freak there.

Of course, I thought Marty was gonna do that with Donnie Edwards too.

-King- 02-18-2009 02:59 PM

DJ. I think he likes to blitz more than anything. He would have fun coming off that corner blitzing as an OLB.

bowener 02-18-2009 03:00 PM

I think DJ will have his career revived by playing the ILB position. He is not an OLB in the 34. He has the physical skills to roam behind the DL and react to the play as well as cover a RB or TE in coverage. I think he will look good in this system. McBride is a true 34 DE, so he probably will improve... not too hard for him to get better than he has been.

CupidStunt 02-18-2009 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5504444)
I think DJ will have his career revived by playing the ILB position. He is not an OLB in the 34. He has the physical skills to roam behind the DL and react to the play as well as cover a RB or TE in coverage. I think he will look good in this system. McBride is a true 34 DE, so he probably will improve... not too hard for him to get better than he has been.

:spock:

You couldn't be more wrong on both players if you TRIED TO BE MORE WRONG.

bowener 02-18-2009 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 5504420)
I'm thinking they envision having Curry hit the weights, and put him in the middle. He'd be a freak there.

Of course, I thought Marty was gonna do that with Donnie Edwards too.

My understanding is that in the 34 you want guys to be around 6'2" 240-250 lbs and quick. The monster guys play the OLB. So maybe you want Curry as ROLB?

bowener 02-18-2009 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 5504452)
:spock:

You couldn't be more wrong on both players if you TRIED TO BE MORE WRONG.

Ok. So educate me on the matter.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 5504420)
I'm thinking they envision having Curry hit the weights, and put him in the middle. He'd be a freak there.

Of course, I thought Marty was gonna do that with Donnie Edwards too.

Why would you spend a top three pick on an inside linebacker in a 3-4??

The only two positions on that D worth that pick are OLB (which is the equivalent of a RDE) and NT.

You can't spend 60 million dollars on Aaron Curry to play inside linebacker. It makes him the highest paid linebacker in the league, and it will wreak havoc on your salary cap, not to mention the fact that it's just not that important of a position.

You should be spending a top three pick on a QB, RDE (OLB), LT or a FREAK DT, or WR. That's really about it.

soundmind 02-18-2009 03:06 PM

Tyler - Dorsey - McBride
XXXXX - XXXXX - Johnson - Hali

If you could replace that void with a Raven and Peppers....don't you feel a thousand times better about this defense?

FAX 02-18-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5504465)
...You should be spending a top three pick on a QB, RDE (OLB), LT or a FREAK DT, or WR. That's really about it.

I agree with this wholeheartedly, Mr. 'Hamas' Jenkins, although a super-stud RB might also warrant a pick that high, I suppose. It presents an interesting question, though. What if (based on the system you're running and your current roster) there isn't a draft choice that really fits?

Based on our current level of suck, it won't be a problem for us this year, but it makes you wonder. Do you try and trade the pick? Select for positional depth?

FAX

Mr. Kotter 02-18-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5504465)
Why would you spend a top three pick on an inside linebacker in a 3-4??

The only two positions on that D worth that pick are OLB (which is the equivalent of a RDE) and NT.

You can't spend 60 million dollars on Aaron Curry to play inside linebacker. It makes him the highest paid linebacker in the league, and it will wreak havoc on your salary cap, not to mention the fact that it's just not that important of a position.

You should be spending a top three pick on a QB, RDE (OLB), LT or a FREAK DT, or WR. That's really about it.


Okay. I'll stick to coaching. You handle the F.O.

My bad.

milkman 02-18-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundmind (Post 5504472)
Tyler - Dorsey - McBride
XXXXX - XXXXX - Johnson - Hali

If you could replace that void with a Raven and Peppers....don't you feel a thousand times better about this defense?

No.

That defense would suck balls.

DeezNutz 02-18-2009 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5504506)
No.

That defense would suck balls.

You don't think the 300 lb. DT is a good fit?

That's not the ideal?

CupidStunt 02-18-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5504463)
Ok. So educate me on the matter.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=147

DJ has the size to play ILB, but he's too much of a pussy. He might be OK at WILB, but that's the least important position on a 3-4 defense. He'd make a much better complimentary rush 'backer. He's not a 15-sack guy but if he adds 10lbs. I see no reason why he couldn't notch 7-9 sacks per season.

As for McBride, the dude is flat-out too small right now and doesn't have the ideal frame to grow much. He's also never shown the quickness to set the edge, nevermind the ability to control two gaps.

milkman 02-18-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5504523)
You don't think the 300 lb. DT is a good fit?

That's not the ideal?

Hell, that ain't all of it.

I just don't get how anyone thinks that a slow DE is going to transition to OLB in 34 and be successful.

It "bottles" the mind.

DeezNutz 02-18-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5504541)
Hell, that ain't all of it.

I just don't get how anyone thinks that a slow DE is going to transition to OLB in 34 and be successful.

It "bottles" the mind.

It is bottling.

That whole alignment sucks ass. Tank as the DE?

On paper, he's one of the few people who could potentially fit, but at the T. He'd have to be a hell of a lot more consistent, however.

If the team actually switches to the 3-4, it demands a carpet bombing.

I don't blame the thought, though. It's the perfect time. They're terrible in the 4-3, too, so there's no better time to blow it up.

FAX 02-18-2009 03:32 PM

I doubt very much that Hali would make it as an OLB. Nope. I just don't see it. As for Dorsey, he's a square peg in a round hole in the 3/4 system. I'm beginning to wonder if we're not looking at some kind of hybrid defense here. Something that allows us to use these players in rotation for now as we migrate our personnel and acquire players that actually fit the 3/4 (assuming, of course, that this whole 3/4 deal is not just more wild ass speculation by members of the media who are grasping at straws for grist).

As for DJ, I remain convinced that he's been coached down. I can't believe that, under the right circumstances, he wouldn't be an impact player. Keep in mind that, over the last several years, we've gone through (as of the last count) about 80 billion linebackers - some of whom have left the Chiefs to become contributors for other teams.

FAX

Rooster 02-18-2009 03:32 PM

Who finds success in the 3-4?
 
The Kansas City Chiefs baby!!! Hi Five [the Todd]

MagicHef 02-18-2009 03:33 PM

You can't vote unless you select at least one.

bowener 02-18-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 5504536)
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=147

DJ has the size to play ILB, but he's too much of a pussy. He might be OK at WILB, but that's the least important position on a 3-4 defense. He'd make a much better complimentary rush 'backer. He's not a 15-sack guy but if he adds 10lbs. I see no reason why he couldn't notch 7-9 sacks per season.

As for McBride, the dude is flat-out too small right now and doesn't have the ideal frame to grow much. He's also never shown the quickness to set the edge, nevermind the ability to control two gaps.

Wasnt McBride 278 pounds when we drafted him? I am pretty sure he can gain 10 pounds and play at 290lbs. He looks like he can add at least 10-15 lbs.

I dont know how much of a pussy DJ is since he plays LB in the NFL, but it just seems to me he is better cut out to play ILB and cover the RB and TE's, especially if the OLB is knocking the TE off his route right at the line. He is also pretty quick, making him a good candidate to crash on the gap that a RB may be coming through. I know when we drafted him the knock was that he couldnt shed blocks, but he seems quite capable of that. I think he could also play the OLB position as well. He reminds me of a lesser talented Pat Willis (same size). Willis does have the mind set to crack skulls though, plus god like speed for a LB.

CupidStunt 02-18-2009 03:50 PM

290lb. would still be light. That's the issue. He wouldn't have to gain 8-10lb., it's more like 20-25lb., and even then he'd STILL be one of the lighter guys around. Aaron Smith is one of the lightest worthwhile 3-4 ends in the league and he goes 298lb., but he's 6'5" and is flanked by a 330lb. Pro Bowl-caliber nose guard.

whoman69 02-18-2009 11:35 PM

I'll believe we're going to 3-4 when I see them line up in it, or at minimum start fielding some players that can do it. You need a huge anchor in the middle of this defense. I can see where our coaches might be looking and figure that our guys can't play 4-3 so why not try 3-4. I don't think many can play 3-4 either. Face it, we just don't have much talent in the front 7 right now. I think we're closer to having 4-3 talent. There we have to get a pass rushing end and hope that Hali does better back at his natural position, then find 2 linebackers. In a 3-4 we have to find at least two lineman including the all too rare anchor in the middle, and two linebackers. We're hoping in both circumstances that some of our recent picks show better. I don't think there's enough FAs out there to fill the holes we have.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.