ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Underclassmen QB's in the draft. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202911)

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:09 PM

Underclassmen QB's in the draft.
 
Okay, I know that Leaf was a junior. Probably the worst. Showed very quickly that he was not mature enough to make it in the NFL.

Mike Vick came out as a Junior, but again, lacked maturity.

Vince Young was a junior, and has had a mental breakdown.

Aaron Rodgers was a junior, but he was taken later in the first round.

Flacco and Ryan, last year's wonder rookies.... were both seniors.


I see a lot of red flags from Sancez. He was arrested for sexual assault. (I know, this girl was just out for money.... only he was a couple years removed from going pro, and there was no way for her to profit from it at the time, and her mother was the one who called the police)

He only has 16 games of experience and didn't listen to Pete Carroll or his parents that all advised him to go back to school.

He then hires his brother.

So, my question is, has anyone come into the NFL as a junior as a top ten pick that came in and set the NFL on fire?

I mean, Aaron Rodgers was on the bench for three years prior to the Packers leaning on him as there starter.

Do we want a three year waiting period for our QBOTF?

Anyways, I think QB has to be the most level headed and mature position on the field. I see none of that in Sanchez.

In fact, all I see is an arrogant primadonna that isn't smart enough to know what he doesn't know.

There is probably a junior I am misisng. I would love it even more if there is a junior that has on 16 games starting experience and came in as a top pick and set the world on fire.

Basileus777 02-22-2009 02:11 PM

That's too small of a sample size to draw any meaningful conclusions from.

milkman 02-22-2009 02:12 PM

You're a ****ing idiot.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 5515846)
That's too small of a sample size to draw any meaningful conclusions from.

I am not just saying these guys. I am saying in the history of the NFL, has there been an underclassman at QB that has come in and lit it up?

An honest question.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5515847)
You're a ****ing idiot.

Yes, because I am not willing to rationalize a QB is worth the pick, just because we have it.

Yes, because I am not willing to overlook the sexual assault and his other questionable decisions.

Yes, because I am not willing to overlook that he played for USC and was surrounded by great talent and a great coaching staff, and that 'probably' helped him look pretty good.

Now, do you have any juniors that came out and went in the top 10 that turned out to be great.

Again, I am not saying none have made it.... just wondering who and when.

Oh, and do you think hiring your brother as your agent is a 'good' move?

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5515838)
In fact, all I see is an arrogant primadonna that isn't smart enough to know what he doesn't know.

Look at this.

You wrote this.

Is this "sensible"?

doomy3 02-22-2009 02:20 PM

Well here is the list of quarterbacks who came out early since 1998.

Brock Huard Washington 1999
Josh Booty LSU 2001
Quincy Carter Georgia 2001
Michael Vick Virginia Tech 2001
Bret Engemann Brigham Young 2003
Rex Grossman Florida 2003
Derek Jones West Virginia 2003
Ben Roethlisberger Miami (Ohio) 2004
Matt Mauck LSU QB 2004
Aaron Rodgers California 2005
Alex Smith Utah 2005
Walter Washington Temple 2005
Omar Jacobs Bowling Green 2006
Brandon Kirsch Purdue 2006
Marcus Vick Virginia Tech 2006
Vince Young Texas 2006
JaMarcus Russell LSU 2007
Xavier Lee Florida State 2008

Just Passin' By 02-22-2009 02:21 PM

Thank goodness! This board had gone almost 20 minutes without a new thread about Stafford/Sanchez.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5515859)
Look at this.

You wrote this.

Is this "sensible"?

So, you don't have any junior Qb's in the top ten either that have come out and been successful?

I guess, maybe, that is what Pete Carroll was telling the kid.

Now, what many fail to realize is that a ton of kids have looked good on tape for a season. It isn't that uncommon. It is even more common when you have that kid surrounded by good coaches and good talent.

Here are the list of red flags:

#1) Lack of experience.
#2) Sexual Assault arrest.
#3) Didn't listen to his coaches or his parents in leaving school early.
#4) Hired his brother as his agent.
#5) Poor combine performance.

Just not sold on the guy. But, then again, I try to be sensible and realize that a great linebacker, WR or even RT is better than a bust at QB.

I know that the 'in crowd' on here struggles with that.

milkman 02-22-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5515858)
Yes, because I am not willing to rationalize a QB is worth the pick, just because we have it.

Yes, because I am not willing to overlook the sexual assault and his other questionable decisions.

Yes, because I am not willing to overlook that he played for USC and was surrounded by great talent and a great coaching staff, and that 'probably' helped him look pretty good.

Now, do you have any juniors that came out and went in the top 10 that turned out to be great.

Again, I am not saying none have made it.... just wondering who and when.

Oh, and do you think hiring your brother as your agent is a 'good' move?

You are a ****ing idiot because you base this whole immaturity argument and call him an arrogant prima donna based on the fact that he chose to go into the draft in spite of the advise he got from his family and Pete Carroll.

You have no idea what he had going through his mind when he was weighing his decision.

You have no idea what guys like Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart, who he talked with, had to say to him that affected his decision.

The fact, making an assumption that he's immature and arrogant based solely on that decision is about the single stupidest thing I've ever heard.

You also refuse to consider any other thing when it comes to your viewpoint.

It doesn't matter to you that the DA found no evidence to support that girl's claim, and in fact, it has been posted elsewher that they had clear evidence she lied to police when she told them she and Sanchez left the bar together, because video shows that she left the bar alone.

All your dumbass has is that you don't like Sanchez, so you are going to disparage him in any way you can.

I hope your dumbass falls backwards on to a Roberto Alomar tree stump.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5515867)
Well here is the list of quarterbacks who came out early since 1998.

Brock Huard Washington 1999
Josh Booty LSU 2001
Quincy Carter Georgia 2001
Michael Vick Virginia Tech 2001
Bret Engemann Brigham Young 2003
Rex Grossman Florida 2003
Derek Jones West Virginia 2003
Ben Roethlisberger Miami (Ohio) 2004
Matt Mauck LSU QB 2004
Aaron Rodgers California 2005
Alex Smith Utah 2005
Walter Washington Temple 2005
Omar Jacobs Bowling Green 2006
Brandon Kirsch Purdue 2006
Marcus Vick Virginia Tech 2006
Vince Young Texas 2006
JaMarcus Russell LSU 2007
Xavier Lee Florida State 2008

Big Ben is as good as the list gets. And, he was a three year starter in college.

Michael Vick was never the great traditional QB. And, unless Sanchez can run a sub 4.4... then probably doens't compare to Vick.

This isn't to say that Sanchez can't be great, but surely don't see any historical reference that suggest he will.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 02:34 PM

So Sensible based on your historical evidence, who would you draft at the #3 spot that will be a sure walk to the HOF?

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5515889)
You are a ****ing idiot because you base this whole immaturity argument and call him an arrogant prima donna based on the fact that he chose to go into the draft in spite of the advise he got from his family and Pete Carroll.

You have no idea what he had going through his mind when he was weighing his decision.

You have no idea what guys like Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart, who he talked with, had to say to him that affected his decision.

The fact, making an assumption that he's immature and arrogant based solely on that decision is about the single stupidest thing I've ever heard.

You also refuse to consider any other thing when it comes to your viewpoint.

It doesn't matter to you that the DA found no evidence to support that girl's claim, and in fact, it has been posted elsewher that they had clear evidence she lied to police when she told them she and Sanchez left the bar together, because video shows that she left the bar alone.

All your dumbass has is that you don't like Sanchez, so you are going to disparage him in any way you can.

I hope your dumbass falls backwards on to a Roberto Alomar tree stump.


Didn't see the part where the girl had lied to the police. I started doing more research on the kid because I WANTED to like him. The Chiefs NEED a franchise QB. They have the third pick. It would be nice to feel like he was worth the pick. That is when I ran into that story.

Do you have a link about the girl llying to police?

Yes, I do think it shows imaturity to leave school early. It shows he wants to get his payday. Football is about more than just getting paid. If not, then I don't want you leading my team.

Finally, the hiring of his brother as his agent shows how arrogant, ignorant and immature this kid is.

It will be interesting to see how his career pans out.

But, for the record, you couldn't give me a guy that came out after his junior year and set the NFL on fire. Especially not one with 16 games experience.

I know, I am the one not wanting to see anyone elses side on this.

smittysbar 02-22-2009 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5515889)
You are a ****ing idiot because you base this whole immaturity argument and call him an arrogant prima donna based on the fact that he chose to go into the draft in spite of the advise he got from his family and Pete Carroll.

You have no idea what he had going through his mind when he was weighing his decision.

You have no idea what guys like Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart, who he talked with, had to say to him that affected his decision.

The fact, making an assumption that he's immature and arrogant based solely on that decision is about the single stupidest thing I've ever heard.

You also refuse to consider any other thing when it comes to your viewpoint.

It doesn't matter to you that the DA found no evidence to support that girl's claim, and in fact, it has been posted elsewher that they had clear evidence she lied to police when she told them she and Sanchez left the bar together, because video shows that she left the bar alone.

All your dumbass has is that you don't like Sanchez, so you are going to disparage him in any way you can.

I hope your dumbass falls backwards on to a Roberto Alomar tree stump.

:bravo:

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5515919)
Didn't see the part where the girl had lied to the police.

Yes, I do think it shows imaturity to leave school early. It shows he wants to get his payday. Football is about more than just getting paid. If not, then I don't want you leading my team.

Finally, the hiring of his brother as his agent shows how arrogant, ignorant and immature this kid is.

1. Shocking that you hadn't seen this. It's been discussed so many ****ing times it's unbelievable.

2. We should draft only seniors. Juniors bad. Seniors good.

3. Yes, how unbelievably stupid for the kid to surround himself with people whom he trusts. Family. Stupid. And has been pointed out numerous times, his brother isn't the only one helping him with this process.

kstater 02-22-2009 02:43 PM

Grandma Ople's Apple Pie SUBMITTED BY: MOSHASMAMA PHOTO BY: notyouraveragegranny

"This was my grandmother's apple pie recipe. I have never seen another one quite like it. It will always be my favorite, and I hope it becomes one of your favorites as well!"

RECIPE RATING:

Read Reviews (732)
Review/Rate This Recipe

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PREP TIME 30 Min
COOK TIME 1 Hr
READY IN 1 Hr 30 Min
Original recipe yield 1 - 9 inch pie

SERVINGS (Help)
Servings
US METRIC



INGREDIENTS (Nutrition)
1 recipe pastry for a 9 inch double crust pie
1/2 cup unsalted butter
3 tablespoons all-purpose flour
1/2 cup white sugar
1/2 cup packed brown sugar
1/4 cup water
8 Granny Smith apples - peeled, cored and sliced
Add to Recipe Box
My folders:


Add to Shopping List
Customize Recipe
Add a Personal Note

What to Drink?
Coffee



DIRECTIONS
Melt butter in a sauce pan. Stir in flour to form a paste. Add white sugar, brown sugar and water; bring to a boil. Reduce temperature, and simmer 5 minutes.
Meanwhile, place the bottom crust in your pan. Fill with apples, mounded slightly. Cover with a lattice work of crust. Gently pour the sugar and butter liquid over the crust. Pour slowly so that it does not run off.
Bake 15 minutes at 425 degrees F (220 degrees C). Reduce the temperature to 350 degrees F (175 degrees C), and continue baking for 35 to 45 minutes.
FOOTNOTE
Baking pie is a rather straightforward technique, but a few tips can only help to make your pies come out looking and tasting perfect!

milkman 02-22-2009 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5515919)
Didn't see the part where the girl had lied to the police. I started doing more research on the kid because I WANTED to like him. The Chiefs NEED a franchise QB. They have the third pick. It would be nice to feel like he was worth the pick. That is when I ran into that story.

Do you have a link about the girl llying to police?

Yes, I do think it shows imaturity to leave school early. It shows he wants to get his payday. Football is about more than just getting paid. If not, then I don't want you leading my team.

Finally, the hiring of his brother as his agent shows how arrogant, ignorant and immature this kid is.

It will be interesting to see how his career pans out.

But, for the record, you couldn't give me a guy that came out after his junior year and set the NFL on fire. Especially not one with 16 games experience.

I know, I am the one not wanting to see anyone elses side on this.

I don't have the link to the specific info about that incident that somenone else talked about.

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/apr...s/sp-sanchez27

Yeah cause no one else has any concerns about money.

And he hired his brother, as well as hiring an experienced agent to represent him.
But he's so immature because he hired a family member to look after his interests.

Sensible is the biggest misnomer ever.

kstater 02-22-2009 02:43 PM

Tips for making a fruit pie:

Baking Fruit Pies
By: Allrecipes Staff

There's a fruit pie for every season: strawberry-rhubarb for spring, cherry in summer, pear in the fall, and apple in winter.

Baking fruit pies is a rather straightforward technique, but a few tips can help to make your pies come out looking and tasting perfect.

1. Preheat the oven to the temperature the recipe you are following recommends. Most fruit pies bake at a temperature of between 350 degrees F (175 degrees C) and 450 degrees F (230 degrees C). Some recipes call for baking the pie in a 450 degree F oven for the first part of baking, then turning down the oven to about 350 degrees F. This helps set the shape of the crust in recipes that contain a lot of fat; it can keep your crust from slouching.
2. To add a richer color to a double-crust or lattice-topped pie, brush the top crust with milk or lightly beaten egg before baking.
3. Baking a pie with a raw fruit filling will take about an hour. Always bake pies on a baking sheet to prevent spillovers in the oven. Berry, apple, and pear pies cook for approximately 45 minutes. When using a pre-cooked filling, pies can bake at a higher temperature for a shorter period of time, just enough to thoroughly bake the crust and heat the filling.

To check the doneness of the filling, insert a knife into the center of the pie. If it meets with little or no resistance, the pie is done. If the pie is not quite done but the top or edges are becoming too dark, loosely cover the top of the pie with aluminum foil to shield it from the heat. A glass pie dish is a great way to ensure the bottom crust is fully baked; using a baking stone or pizza stone is another trick. Baking on a stone ensures that the bottom crust on even the juiciest fruit pie will be done when the top is brown.

See Perfect Pie Crusts for more information.


Perfect Pie Crusts
4. For shine and sparkle, thin a quarter cup of light corn syrup with very hot water. When the pie is done, brush the thinned syrup over the top of the crust. You can add granulated sugar or decorative sugar at this time. Return the pie to the oven for two to three minutes to let the glaze dry and set. Once the pie is done baking, carefully remove it from the oven. Let the pie cool to room temperature before slicing to allow the filling to set.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5515933)
1. Shocking that you hadn't seen this. It's been discussed so many ****ing times it's unbelievable.

2. We should draft only seniors. Juniors bad. Seniors good.

3. Yes, how unbelievably stupid for the kid to surround himself with people whom he trusts. Family. Stupid. And has been pointed out numerous times, his brother isn't the only one helping him with this process.

1. Sorry.

2. When junior QB's have a history of failure, one might think twice before doing it. But, that wouldn't play into the franchise QB at all costs crowd. Not saying he isn't worth drafting, just not at #3.

3. LOL. Well, anyway to rationalize, I suppose. There are some things that you leave up to professionals.

melbar 02-22-2009 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5515889)
You are a ****ing idiot because you base this whole immaturity argument and call him an arrogant prima donna based on the fact that he chose to go into the draft in spite of the advise he got from his family and Pete Carroll.

You have no idea what he had going through his mind when he was weighing his decision.

You have no idea what guys like Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart, who he talked with, had to say to him that affected his decision.

The fact, making an assumption that he's immature and arrogant based solely on that decision is about the single stupidest thing I've ever heard.

You also refuse to consider any other thing when it comes to your viewpoint.

It doesn't matter to you that the DA found no evidence to support that girl's claim, and in fact, it has been posted elsewher that they had clear evidence she lied to police when she told them she and Sanchez left the bar together, because video shows that she left the bar alone.

All your dumbass has is that you don't like Sanchez, so you are going to disparage him in any way you can.

I hope your dumbass falls backwards on to a Roberto Alomar tree stump.

This is what I'm talking about. I'm not saying ya or nay on Sanchez, (actually I like him) But calling someone a ****ing idiot and that they should have bodily injury for questioning Sanchez? Really?
And Pot you're a little black calling someone out for disparaging a prospect just because you dont like them. (see Curry)

I dont care if he's a nOOb, a vet, or claiming the sky is purple, show just a little respect. If not for him then for the board.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5515939)
I don't have the link to the specific info about that incident that somenone else talked about.

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/apr...s/sp-sanchez27

Yeah cause no one else has any concerns about money.

And he hired his brother, as well as hiring an experienced agent to represent him.
But he's so immature because he hired a family member to look after his interests.

Sensible is the biggest misnomer ever.


So, as long as the info is positive, then you can take it at face value concerning Sanchez. Got it. No actual proof that the girl lied.

As far as his money.... it is a bad sign that he is so worried about it now.

As far as his brother being his agent. If this was the only issue, it would be a non issue.

I just think there are enough red flags that you don't take him #3 overall.

It will be interesting to see where he goes in the draft. If the Chiefs take him at #3 I will change my account to insensible Chiefs fan.

I am sure that Pioli and Haley are smart enough not to do it.

milkman 02-22-2009 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5515954)
This is what I'm talking about. I'm not saying ya or nay on Sanchez, (actually I like him) But calling someone a ****ing idiot and that they should have bodily injury for questioning Sanchez? Really?
And Pot you're a little black calling someone out for disparaging a prospect just because you dont like them. (see Curry)

I dont care if he's a nOOb, a vet, or claiming the sky is purple, show just a little respect. If not for him then for the board.

I don't believe I've ever downplayed Curry's talent.

I'm pretty sure that all I've ever said is that he hasn't shown he's a pass rushing LB, and that isn't good value for the #3 overall pick.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5515954)
This is what I'm talking about. I'm not saying ya or nay on Sanchez, (actually I like him) But calling someone a ****ing idiot and that they should have bodily injury for questioning Sanchez? Really?
And Pot you're a little black calling someone out for disparaging a prospect just because you dont like them. (see Curry)

I dont care if he's a nOOb, a vet, or claiming the sky is purple, show just a little respect. If not for him then for the board.

If you are looking to rid the board of hotheaded opinionated fans, then you might as well shut down Chiefsplanet.

But, it shows how insecure he is in his opinion is that he can't debate it rationally without hurling insults.

blueballs 02-22-2009 02:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)
.

kstater 02-22-2009 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5515972)
If you are looking to rid the board of hotheaded opinionated fans, then you might as well shut down Chiefsplanet.

But, it shows how insecure he is in his opinion is that he can't debate it rationally without hurling insults.

OK, we can debate "sensibly". No, other than Rothlesburger, no junior QB has been "successful". But show me how prior QB play has any bearing as to how future QB's play.

melbar 02-22-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5515964)
I don't believe I've ever downplayed Curry's talent.

I'm pretty sure that all I've ever said is that he hasn't shown he's a pass rushing LB, and that isn't good value for the #3 overall pick.

Its all good. I'm looking at who's said what etc. Some have, some havent. We just all seem a little on edge lately thats all.:p

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5515980)
OK, we can debate "sensibly". No, other than Rothlesburger, no junior QB has been "successful". But show me how prior QB play has any bearing as to how future QB's play.

We have seen example after example of QB's coming out with little experience and flaming out in the NFL. Akili Smith was a senior, but actually had starting experience similar to that of Mark Sanchez.

It isn't just his lack of experience. It is his ability to handle the pressure of being a high first round guy and a 'savior' of a franchise.

For crying out loud, the kid looked tight at the combine today.

See, I am not 'trying' to bash the kid. I WANT to believe in him. I want the Chiefs to have a great QB. I want him to be worthy of the #3 pick.

But, every stone I uncover about him, I find another red flag.

I was really hoping to see him spin the ball well today at the combine and he was very dissapointing. I would have thought he had an arm like Marino from the gaga posters on this board.

He had a long delivery, a slow release, the balls didn't have a ton of zip on them AND he wasn't accurate.

All the things I thought were his 'positives'... he failed to deliver on today.

I just don't think he has the maturity to handle the NFL. I think his parents and his coaches know him better than we do... well, at least better than I do.

But, again, I am just trying to look at all angles.

I don't think a ILB is worth the #3 pick. I don't think a WR on this team is worth the #3 pick. I don't think a RT is worth the #3 pick.

However, I would rather have great players at those positions than a bust at QB in the name of attempting to draft a franchise QB.

JMO.

milkman 02-22-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5515972)
If you are looking to rid the board of hotheaded opinionated fans, then you might as well shut down Chiefsplanet.

But, it shows how insecure he is in his opinion is that he can't debate it rationally without hurling insults.

No, I called you names because you I made a couple of concessions in our debates, and you refused to even attempt to meet in the middle.

So, go fist yourself.

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5515980)
OK, we can debate "sensibly". No, other than Rothlesburger, no junior QB has been "successful". But show me how prior QB play has any bearing as to how future QB's play.

Well, to be fair, when making decisions, history is something that needs to be looked at. If there is completely overwhelming history as there is in this case, there better be NO questions, and I just don't see that being the case here.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:12 PM

Akili Smith is a great comparison.

I know this is supremely unimportant, but what type of offense was Smith coming from again?

Oh yeah. Those little details can be a bitch sometimes.

kstater 02-22-2009 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516003)
We have seen example after example of QB's coming out with little experience and flaming out in the NFL. Akili Smith was a senior, but actually had starting experience similar to that of Mark Sanchez.

It isn't just his lack of experience. It is his ability to handle the pressure of being a high first round guy and a 'savior' of a franchise.

For crying out loud, the kid looked tight at the combine today.

See, I am not 'trying' to bash the kid. I WANT to believe in him. I want the Chiefs to have a great QB. I want him to be worthy of the #3 pick.

But, every stone I uncover about him, I find another red flag.

I was really hoping to see him spin the ball well today at the combine and he was very dissapointing. I would have thought he had an arm like Marino from the gaga posters on this board.

He had a long delivery, a slow release, the balls didn't have a ton of zip on them AND he wasn't accurate.

All the things I thought were his 'positives'... he failed to deliver on today.

I just don't think he has the maturity to handle the NFL. I think his parents and his coaches know him better than we do... well, at least better than I do.

But, again, I am just trying to look at all angles.

I don't think a ILB is worth the #3 pick. I don't think a WR on this team is worth the #3 pick. I don't think a RT is worth the #3 pick.

However, I would rather have great players at those positions than a bust at QB in the name of attempting to draft a franchise QB.

JMO.


Do you think in a year or two he'll have the maturity to play in the NFL? Or is he a lifelong rapist.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516019)
Akili Smith is a great comparison.

I know this is supremely unimportant, but what type of offense was Smith coming from again?

Oh yeah. Those little details can be a bitch sometimes.

To make sure this isn't obscured by being at the bottom of the page.

milkman 02-22-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5516017)
Well, to be fair, when making decisions, history is something that needs to be looked at. If there is completely overwhelming history as there is in this case, there better be NO questions, and I just don't see that being the case here.

Overwhelming history?

That list of QBs has three QBs who I believe were first round picks, of which only one, Alex Smith, might be considered to be on his way to busting.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516029)
Overwhelming history?

That list of QBs has three QBs who I believe were first round picks, of which only one, Alex Smith, might be considered to be on his way to busting.

That would be considered overhelming?

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516029)
Overwhelming history?

That list of QBs has three QBs who I believe were first round picks, of which only one, Alex Smith, might be considered to be on his way to busting.


Michael Vick Virginia Tech 2001
Rex Grossman Florida 2003
Ben Roethlisberger Miami (Ohio) 2004
Aaron Rodgers California 2005
Alex Smith Utah 2005
Vince Young Texas 2006
JaMarcus Russell LSU 2007


Well these are all first rounders, so there have been 7 actually since 1998. I would say that all but Ben and Rodgers have been pretty underwhelming, and the jury is still out on Russell.

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5516032)
That would be considered overhelming?

Well, if for once in your life you actually knew what you were talking about instead of immediately agreeing with one of about 5 posters, your opinion may actually mean something.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5516044)
Well, if for once in your life you actually knew what you were talking about instead of immediately agreeing with one of about 5 posters, your opinion may actually mean something.

Coming from you, that actually means alot... ROFL I failed to realize your opinion is well respected thoughout the NFL... Just like the rest of ours... ROFL

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5516057)
Coming from you, that actually means alot... ROFL I failed to realize your opinion is well respected thoughout the NFL... Just like the rest of ours... ROFL

Hmm, didn't think I said that at all. It's just funny to watch you follow posters who actually make a point, like Milkman, Mecca, Hamas, etc, and just post bullshit that doesn't mean anything at all.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516010)
No, I called you names because you I made a couple of concessions in our debates, and you refused to even attempt to meet in the middle.

So, go fist yourself.

You 'concessions' were justifications about his poor performance today. The 'pressure' got to him. (That is what I want in a QB, someone who caves under the pressure of working out in shorts and a t-shirt).

I would go fist myself, but I've got my hands full... one hand is in your mom the other is in your sister.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5516042)
Michael Vick Virginia Tech 2001
Rex Grossman Florida 2003
Ben Roethlisberger Miami (Ohio) 2004
Aaron Rodgers California 2005
Alex Smith Utah 2005
Vince Young Texas 2006
JaMarcus Russell LSU 2007


Well these are all first rounders, so there have been 7 actually since 1998. I would say that all but Ben and Rodgers have been pretty underwhelming, and the jury is still out on Russell.

You're making a very reductive argument here.

So, yes, at first glance one can say only Roethlisberger and Rogers are looking like strong selections. But let's factor in other elements, like the biggest one: what type of offense were these players running in college?

I'm sorry, anyone who couldn't see that Vince Young was going to be a ****ing disaster was a complete idiot, even more than Young himself with his 6 Wonderlic.

You can't just look at this list and say, "Yep. 33% change of success."

But even if you did do that type of half-ass analysis, 33% chance of landing a franchise QB is pretty damn good.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5516022)
Do you think in a year or two he'll have the maturity to play in the NFL? Or is he a lifelong rapist.

I think he would be fine as a developmental prospect, but that isn't worth the #3 pick. #3 picks are supposed to be polished players that are ready to play this year, and be impact players next year.

As far as the rapist goes, don't know. Maybe that is why he coming out, so he will have the money to buy the silence of the girls he sexually assaults.

For the record, that was a joke. I am sure that some will blow it out of proportion.

milkman 02-22-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516065)
You 'concessions' were justifications about his poor performance today. The 'pressure' got to him. (That is what I want in a QB, someone who caves under the pressure of working out in shorts and a t-shirt).

I would go fist myself, but I've got my hands full... one hand is in your mom the other is in your sister.

I also conceded that his workout could very well hurt his draft status, dumb****.

And just for the record, I chose not to answer your question who the agent is.

I was the one who first posted his name a couple of days ago.

ChiefsCountry 02-22-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516073)
I think he would be fine as a developmental prospect, but that isn't worth the #3 pick. #3 picks are supposed to be polished players that are ready to play this year, and be impact players next year.

For any position other than QB this should be the case.

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516069)
You're making a very reductive argument here.

So, yes, at first glance one can say only Roethlisberger and Rogers are looking like strong selections. But let's factor in other elements, like the biggest one: what type of offense were these players running in college?

I'm sorry, anyone who couldn't see that Vince Young was going to be a ****ing disaster was a complete idiot, even more than Young himself with his 6 Wonderlic.

You can't just look at this list and say, "Yep. 33% change of success."

But even if you did do that type of half-ass analysis, 33% chance of landing a franchise QB is pretty damn good.


I'm not attempting to make any kind of an argument on this subject. All I did in this thread was answer the original poster's question and post the facts of who was drafted, and then when Milkman said there were 3 first rounders, I pointed out there were 7. I mean, I understand what you are saying about what kind of offenses these guys were running in college and all that, but it is funny that the only one of these guys who has proven anything, Roethlisberger, also came from a spread offense, and he seems to be OK.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516069)
You're making a very reductive argument here.

So, yes, at first glance one can say only Roethlisberger and Rogers are looking like strong selections. But let's factor in other elements, like the biggest one: what type of offense were these players running in college?

I'm sorry, anyone who couldn't see that Vince Young was going to be a ****ing disaster was a complete idiot, even more than Young himself with his 6 Wonderlic.

You can't just look at this list and say, "Yep. 33% change of success."

But even if you did do that type of half-ass analysis, 33% chance of landing a franchise QB is pretty damn good.


Yet, neither of the guys that are successes, Rothlisberger and Rodgers were top five picks. Neither had that pressure to deal with.

kstater 02-22-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516073)
I think he would be fine as a developmental prospect, but that isn't worth the #3 pick. #3 picks are supposed to be polished players that are ready to play this year, and be impact players next year.

As far as the rapist goes, don't know. Maybe that is why he coming out, so he will have the money to buy the silence of the girls he sexually assaults.

For the record, that was a joke. I am sure that some will blow it out of proportion.

Then I'd say your expectations of a QB are way too high.

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516076)
I also conceded that his workout could very well hurt his draft status, dumb****.

And just for the record, I chose not to answer your question who the agent is.

I was the one who first posted his name a couple of days ago.

Yep, this is 100% true. In fact, you are the only "Sanchez guy" who has admitted this so far.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-22-2009 03:33 PM

Two stupid quarterbacks who look to run rather than pass, another guy who came from a system that was notorious for producing overrated prospects...and this is your sample size?

milkman 02-22-2009 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516073)
I think he would be fine as a developmental prospect, but that isn't worth the #3 pick. #3 picks are supposed to be polished players that are ready to play this year, and be impact players next year.

As far as the rapist goes, don't know. Maybe that is why he coming out, so he will have the money to buy the silence of the girls he sexually assaults.

For the record, that was a joke. I am sure that some will blow it out of proportion.

Not at QB.

Ryan, Flacco and Peyton Manning were exceptions.

Most QBs, even top 5 guys, should be able to watch and learn for at least a season, or at the least, half a season.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516027)
To make sure this isn't obscured by being at the bottom of the page.

Well, I HOPE that Sanchez is better than Akili Smith. But it just shows how a guy can have one good year and then cash in.

Qb's need maturity and experience. I don't see it with this kid.

milkman 02-22-2009 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5516079)
I'm not attempting to make any kind of an argument on this subject. All I did in this thread was answer the original poster's question and post the facts of who was drafted, and then when Milkman said there were 3 first rounders, I pointed out there were 7. I mean, I understand what you are saying about what kind of offenses these guys were running in college and all that, but it is funny that the only one of these guys who has proven anything, Roethlisberger, also came from a spread offense, and he seems to be OK.

Yeah, sorry, I made a cursory glance at the list, and ****ed up.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-22-2009 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5516042)
Michael Vick Virginia Tech 2001
Rex Grossman Florida 2003
Ben Roethlisberger Miami (Ohio) 2004
Aaron Rodgers California 2005
Alex Smith Utah 2005
Vince Young Texas 2006
JaMarcus Russell LSU 2007


Well these are all first rounders, so there have been 7 actually since 1998. I would say that all but Ben and Rodgers have been pretty underwhelming, and the jury is still out on Russell.

Running QB
Spread QB
Spread QB (made it work, future HOFer most likely)
Rodgers
Spread QB
Running Spread QB
Notoriously Lazy QB.

If I were looking at this list, I'd say it tells me one thing:

Don't take a QB from the spread.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5516077)
For any position other than QB this should be the case.

At some point either this year or in 2011 we are going to have to draft and develop a QB...

Are we willing to throw away the next two seasons waiting on the 2011 draft class? People seem to think there are two ways to aquire a QB...

Do we want to have the "team" in place than have to sit around and watch guys get older, contracts expire, FA, etc, before we finally draft a QBOTF and invest the time into building a championship team?

Or do we draft one this year and start developing him so in 3 years we are maybe in place to make a playoff push to a championship?

Such a tough window we are in right now with nothing to speak of coming out next year in the QB position... And no, I see enough Big 12 football, there isnt ONE QB coming out next year worthy of a 1st round pick... Sorry OU fans...

Just Passin' By 02-22-2009 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516073)
I think he would be fine as a developmental prospect, but that isn't worth the #3 pick. #3 picks are supposed to be polished players that are ready to play this year, and be impact players next year.

As far as the rapist goes, don't know. Maybe that is why he coming out, so he will have the money to buy the silence of the girls he sexually assaults.

For the record, that was a joke. I am sure that some will blow it out of proportion.

Sanchez is 22 years old. Even if he sits out for 2 seasons, he'll still be young when he takes over as the starter. There are valid reasons to avoid taking Sanchez at #3, but just thinking that he's not ready yet is not one of them, because a franchise quarterback is worth waiting a year or two for, no matter where he's picked in the draft.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516086)
Not at QB.

Ryan, Flacco and Peyton Manning were exceptions.

Most QBs, even top 5 guys, should be able to watch and learn for at least a season, or at the least, half a season.

I don't think it will happen that often anymore. It used to be the way of the NFL, but times have changed for the most part.

And, I am not talking about watching for a season. I am fine with that. I don't think he will be ready next year either, if then.

If you are going to wait two years, then you might as well draft a project like Nate Davis.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516080)
Yet, neither of the guys that are successes, Rothlisberger and Rodgers were top five picks. Neither had that pressure to deal with.

Is there some new magic pressure that goes with being the #3 overall pick as opposed to the #10?

Did Roethlisberger take the field, at any time, breathing a large sigh of relief that he didn't have to bear that enormous top 5 burden?

I'm sure the fanbase would have been very forgiving because, hey, he was just a shitty #10 overall pick, not a "top 5."

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5516098)
Sanchez is 22 years old. Even if he sits out for 2 seasons, he'll still be young when he takes over as the starter. There are valid reasons to avoid taking Sanchez at #3, but just thinking that he's not ready yet is not one of them, because a franchise quarterback is worth waiting a year or two for, no matter where he's picked in the draft.


Then we dissagree. And, that is fine. I don't think you pay a QB huge money to ride the bench for two years in the hopes that someday he gets it.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516107)
I don't think it will happen that often anymore. It used to be the way of the NFL, but times have changed for the most part.

And, I am not talking about watching for a season. I am fine with that. I don't think he will be ready next year either, if then.

If you are going to wait two years, then you might as well draft a project like Nate Davis.

Yep, times are a changing.

I remember and long for the glory days of '04.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516109)
Is there some new magic pressure that goes with being the #3 overall pick as opposed to the #10?

Did Roethlisberger take the field, at any time, breathing a large sigh of relief that he didn't have to bear that enormous top 5 risk?

I'm sure the fanbase would have been very forgiving because, hey, he was just a shitty #10 overall pick, not a "top 5."

Look how shitty that Ryan Simms pick was...

he was a very safe pick...

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:43 PM

Shhhh.

QB's are the only risky and expensive selection in the top 5.

Other positions rarely bust and cost FAR less.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516109)
Is there some new magic pressure that goes with being the #3 overall pick as opposed to the #10?

Did Roethlisberger take the field, at any time, breathing a large sigh of relief that he didn't have to bear that enormous top 5 risk?

I'm sure the fanbase would have been very forgiving because, hey, he was just a shitty #10 overall pick, not a "top 5."

Actually, Ben was drafted 11th. And, the team around Ben was better than the team around the Chiefs. He didn't have to be the 'savior'. There is a different mentality there.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516116)
Actually, Ben was drafted 11th. And, the team around Ben was better than the team around the Chiefs. He didn't have to be the 'savior'. There is a different mentality there.

Oh noes111 11th. Even bigger difference. He didn't have the top 10 burden, which is great, but not nearly as overwhelming as top 5. Very sensible.

Who the **** is calling either Stafford or Sanchez a savior? This player would be a piece, an important one I grant you, but a piece of a whole.

But your true argument is starting to reveal itself.

Build the rest of the team first, and then add the QB, right?

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5516113)
Look how shitty that Ryan Simms pick was...

he was a very safe pick...

No, he was a pick that looked better due to the talent around him.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516124)
Oh noes111 11th. Even bigger difference. He didn't have the top 10 burden, which is great, but not nearly as overwhelming as top 5. Very sensible.

Who the **** is calling either Stafford or Sanchez a savior? This player would be a piece, an important one I grant you, but a piece of a whole.

If you honestly don't think these guys will be considered 'saviors' then I don't need to waste my time with you.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516128)
If you honestly don't think these guys will be considered 'saviors' then I don't need to waste my time with you.

By dumbshit fans.

Just Passin' By 02-22-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516111)
Then we dissagree. And, that is fine. I don't think you pay a QB huge money to ride the bench for two years in the hopes that someday he gets it.

At least some coaches and GMs feel otherwise, as Mr. McNair and Mr. Rivers can verify.

milkman 02-22-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516128)
If you honestly don't think these guys will be considered 'saviors' then I don't need to waste my time with you.

You are the only dumb**** who thinks that these guys have to be saviors.

Hell with this fan base, the pick could easily be considered anything but a savior.

ChiefsCountry 02-22-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5516130)
At least some coaches and GMs feel otherwise, as Mr. McNair and Mr. Rivers can verify.

Palmer as well.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516128)
If you honestly don't think these guys will be considered 'saviors' then I don't need to waste my time with you.

yet people want someone like Curry to come in and save the defense...

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516129)
By dumbshit fans.

This.

The problem is that there are a lot of these in the QB or bust crowd. It is a serious misconception to think that the only dumbshit fans are the ones who don't like one of these guys.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516124)
Oh noes111 11th. Even bigger difference. He didn't have the top 10 burden, which is great, but not nearly as overwhelming as top 5. Very sensible.

Who the **** is calling either Stafford or Sanchez a savior? This player would be a piece, an important one I grant you, but a piece of a whole.

But your true argument is starting to reveal itself.

Build the rest of the team first, and then add the QB, right?

No, actually, my true argument is that you need to pick a good player at #3, not a QB just because we all want a franchise QB.

I think Stafford would be a good pick, but I don't think he will be there. Even he is a Junior, but he has a ton of experience and has all the physical tools.

I know you want to pigeon hole anyone who dares think Sanchez might be a reach, but don't put words in my mouth.

milkman 02-22-2009 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5516129)
By dumbshit fans.

The dumbshits might say that as the #3 overall, that he better be the savior, but they're the same fans that will throw their hands up and rail against management and decide to skip games because he was selected.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-22-2009 03:51 PM

Anyone who thinks Aaron Curry is worth the third pick is a dumbshit.

DeezNutz 02-22-2009 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516140)
The dumbshits might say that as the #3 overall, that he better be the savior, but they're the same fans that will throw their hands up and rail against management and decide to skip games because he was selected.

Exactly.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-22-2009 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5516130)
At least some coaches and GMs feel otherwise, as Mr. McNair and Mr. Rivers can verify.

McNair was a decade ago. Rivers was a unique situation because Brees bounced back and Marty prefers veterans.

Heck, when Brees left, Marty still wanted him instead.

It isn't the 'plan' to have these guys ride the bench a year these days.

doomy3 02-22-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516140)
The dumbshits might say that as the #3 overall, that he better be the savior, but they're the same fans that will throw their hands up and rail against management and decide to skip games because he was selected.

Do you really believe this, or are you exaggerating? I haven't seen one person say anything about this. In fact, the only people I have heard say they would rail management are the ones who said that if either Sanchez or Stafford is there, and we pass on them, then Pioli is a moron.

Reerun_KC 02-22-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5516137)
This.

The problem is that there are a lot of these in the QB or bust crowd. It is a serious misconception to think that the only dumbshit fans are the ones who don't like one of these guys.

Either one of the QB's are worth investing in... Agree?

Neither will be the savior by they have the talent and potential to build a championship team around and give you 7-10 good years... And if they only win one superbowl or zero in that time frame, at least your building your team to make that leap into the top of the NFL for a 2-4 year period where you could actually compete for a championship...

Neither have to be the savior.... Only a tool would put unreal expectations on QB... But I would actually expect stupid expectations from some of this fanbase... They still long for Carl.

kstater 02-22-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5516138)
No, actually, my true argument is that you need to pick a good player at #3, not a QB just because we all want a franchise QB.

So Sanchez is now, a rapist, immature, being taken advantage by his brother, and not a good player.

Just Passin' By 02-22-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5516140)
The dumbshits might say that as the #3 overall, that he better be the savior, but they're the same fans that will throw their hands up and rail against management and decide to skip games because he was selected.

Well, that's why you bring in the veteran stopgap. He serves both to mentor the young kid and to mollify the mob.

orange 02-22-2009 03:54 PM

I really don't understand the thinking behind drafting a QB at #3 just to have him sit. What's he going to learn by watching that wily veteran Tyler Thigpen?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.