ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs "Experts" say and think the same as Mecca... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202998)

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 07:20 AM

"Experts" say and think the same as Mecca...
 
about Sanchez.

Every Monday, Arrowhead Addict editor/lead writer Adam Best will kick off the week with his AA Greeting — his one-of-a-kind POV on all things Chiefs.

What is this gibberish I’m reading around Chiefs Nation that Mark Sanchez didn’t fare well at the combine. Really? What are my fellow Red-and-Golders smoking?

Today, Scout Inc.’s Todd McShay — who’s Gus Johnson to Mel Kiper’s Dick Vitale — raved about Sanchez, especially his confidence, ability to break down film and intangibles. In fact, McShay talked about the “it” factor. You know, the one I’ve been saying that Sanchez has and Matt Stafford doesn’t for weeks now. Well, apparently quite a few of the personnel folks he talked to agree with me. He even said that there is some movement from Stafford to Sanchez as to who the No. 1 quarterback is.

SportingNews.com’s Russ Lande said:

Southern Cal’s Mark Sanchez helped himself in passing drills and tests. He showed a quick, compact delivery and release. He drove into his passes and the ball exploded out of his hand. His throws had good velocity and a tight, clean spiral. With Georgia’s Matthew Stafford choosing not to throw, Sanchez proved their competition to be the draft’s top quarterback is far from over. Teams were impressed that Sanchez decided to throw and did not look nervous or anxious.

ESPN’s John Clayton:

A ball of nervous energy, USC QB Mark Sanchez had a good throwing performance Sunday at the combine.

After scouring the Interwebs and watching the combine since it kicked off, it seems like most, if not everyone, has been pretty damn impressed by the kid I’ve taken to calling Dirty. So, Don Banks wasn’t impressed. No offense, Don, but after reading your stuff over the years, I’m not so sure Tyra Banks doesn’t know more about the NFL than you do.

Then there’s the fervor behind the Tyler Thigpen movement. Dammit! I just wish Chiefs fans didn’t let their wishful thinking cloud their judgment so much. That’s called being a homer.

But call me Brian Wilson, because for a while there even I was singing “Wouldn’t It Be Nice.” You know, as in wouldn’t it be nice if some seventh-round, third-string quarterback who once got cut by the effin’ Vikings miraculously became our franchise quarterback? But as the season progressed and Thigpen lost game after game, almost never playing well during crunch time, I soured on him. Hey, Tony Gonzalez has carried the jocks of a lot of pedestrian quarterbacks during his tight end reign of terror. This is just another one for us to add to the list.

I also have seen numerous Chiefs fans — not just on this site either — trying to sell that Thigpen’s as good as Matt Cassel. Keep telling yourself that and maybe, just maybe, one day you’ll really believe it.

The reasoning behind this is always that Randy Moss and Wes Welker blow away what we have. Really? I mean, Dwayne Bowe and Tony Gonzalez, the best tight end of all time, aren’t a couple of scrubs. Oh, and only one of these guys made the Pro Bowl this year — Tony G. Sure, Cassel’s offensive line was better, but what about his backs? Kevin Faulk and a bunch of punks and nobodies? BenJarvus Green-Ellis? That sounds like a disease, man. Meanwhile, we had Jamal Charles and Larry Johnson for most of the season. I really don’t think Cassel was at that much of an advantage, especially when you consider that he had to deal with things like actual expectations and pressure, not to mention playing in a much, much better division.The AFC West was garbage last year, especially defensively.

Sorry, but Thigpen is just not in Cassel’s league.

Just read what Peter King had to say about Cassel today, from SI.com:

I’m surprised that a quarterback who played as well as Cassel did for the last 10 weeks of the season is being viewed by most people in the league as too risky to chart a long-term course with. It’s not often in free agency or in trade that a young quarterback with promise is available. And while I understand it’s a millstone around Cassel that he’d require probably two fairly high picks plus an average of $14 million-ish a year in a contract, I still think I’d rather have Cassel as my quarterback of the future than, say, Matthew Stafford. And the money’s not that much different.

Cassel is the real deal, folks. I don’t think anybody would be writing that about Thigpen if he was franchised or even a free agent right now. Then again, I can’t ever see a QB of his caliber being franchised.

Another thing I keep reading over and over and over again is shock that anybody at all is discussing the Chiefs picking or trading for a quarterback with Thigpen in the fold. Wake up, people! If you don’t have a very good quarterback, then you don’t have a quarterback at all. Period. Considering that quarterback is the single most important position in the NFL and we don’t have a good one, yeah, it’s going to be a top priority. Probably the priority. You can have all the Aaron Currys in the world running amok, but if you have a hack quarterback it won’t make any difference.

Am I being hard on Thigpen? No. Not at all. He had a prolonged audition that he never really earned before being thrust into the starting line-up. Our offense was 26th in the league in scoring. Our defense was 29th in points allowed, which means that we had to be aggressive on offense to try and keep pace. Suddenly, the ArrowSpread and Thiggy don’t look so hot any longer. Then you throw in his completion percentage, and it’s not looking good for Thigpen.

It’s never personal. I was hard on Brodie Croyle because I didn’t see him ever being a winning quarterback. He had a lot of starts, and could never win a game. Meanwhile, Thigpen has now had a good chunk of starts, too, and the only game he has won was that freebie up in Oakland. And that game was definitely a freebie. I know — I was there!

I really don’t care if all of Chiefs Nation agrees with me on this one. When it comes to quarterbacks, my track record — Brodie Croyle, Matt Ryan, etc… — speaks for itself. I am confident that Thigpen will not be our quarterback of the future. Very confident.

I also don’t think that there is any way men like Todd Haley and Scott Pioli are going to hedge their careers on Thiggy Smalls. Just writing that makes me feel a little ridiculous, actually. In case you forgot, the Herm Edwards era is over. The Pioli Trinity will bring someone in to at least compete with him. I guaran-damn-tee you that. If he wins the job, hey, more power to him. That would be a dream come true for me, as I’ve been waiting my whole life for the Chiefs to find a young franchise QB. I just can’t see it. Sorry.

The other thing I keep reading that irks me is this Aaron Curry is the “safe” pick, the “safest pick in the draft.” Makes me want to puke. Hey, the kid has a great story and is a phenomenal athlete. But he’s a middle freakin’ linebacker in a year when linebackers seem to be miraculously raining from the sky like frogs or something! Let’s get serious here. Is Chiefs Nation still so haunted by the ghost of Todd Blackhedge that we remain scared you-know-what-less when it comes to drafting or trading for a promising young quarterback.

What was that expression? Scared money don’t make money. I’m confident that The Pioli Trilogy realizes that. They aren’t going to allow the ghosts of Chiefs’ past or any wishful thinking to lead them down the wrong path.

Me? I don’t call the shots, but I’m liking Cassel and Sanchez more and more every single day (I still like Michael Crabtree as well, by the way). Hopefully, the Chiefs are, too, because these kids have the chops to become star quarterbacks in this league under the right guidance (ahem, Todd Haley).

P.S. - With free agency around the corner, and us almost certainly moving to a 3-4, I’m thinking these will be my top candidates when I drop my free agency post later this week, which will probably be another Blueprint…

ILB Bart Scott
DE Chris Canty
OT Khalif Barnes
Lance Moore is also a guy who’s very, very intriguing to me. I think he could become a star in Haley’s system.

Fritz88 02-24-2009 07:37 AM

I approve of Josh Freeman.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521822)
about Sanchez.

Every Monday, Arrowhead Addict editor/lead writer Adam Best will kick off the week with his AA Greeting — his one-of-a-kind POV on all things Chiefs.

What is this gibberish I’m reading around Chiefs Nation that Mark Sanchez didn’t fare well at the combine. Really? What are my fellow Red-and-Golders smoking?

Today, Scout Inc.’s Todd McShay — who’s Gus Johnson to Mel Kiper’s Dick Vitale — raved about Sanchez, especially his confidence, ability to break down film and intangibles. In fact, McShay talked about the “it” factor. You know, the one I’ve been saying that Sanchez has and Matt Stafford doesn’t for weeks now. Well, apparently quite a few of the personnel folks he talked to agree with me. He even said that there is some movement from Stafford to Sanchez as to who the No. 1 quarterback is.

SportingNews.com’s Russ Lande said:

Southern Cal’s Mark Sanchez helped himself in passing drills and tests. He showed a quick, compact delivery and release. He drove into his passes and the ball exploded out of his hand. His throws had good velocity and a tight, clean spiral. With Georgia’s Matthew Stafford choosing not to throw, Sanchez proved their competition to be the draft’s top quarterback is far from over. Teams were impressed that Sanchez decided to throw and did not look nervous or anxious.

ESPN’s John Clayton:

A ball of nervous energy, USC QB Mark Sanchez had a good throwing performance Sunday at the combine.

After scouring the Interwebs and watching the combine since it kicked off, it seems like most, if not everyone, has been pretty damn impressed by the kid I’ve taken to calling Dirty. So, Don Banks wasn’t impressed. No offense, Don, but after reading your stuff over the years, I’m not so sure Tyra Banks doesn’t know more about the NFL than you do.

Then there’s the fervor behind the Tyler Thigpen movement. Dammit! I just wish Chiefs fans didn’t let their wishful thinking cloud their judgment so much. That’s called being a homer.

But call me Brian Wilson, because for a while there even I was singing “Wouldn’t It Be Nice.” You know, as in wouldn’t it be nice if some seventh-round, third-string quarterback who once got cut by the effin’ Vikings miraculously became our franchise quarterback? But as the season progressed and Thigpen lost game after game, almost never playing well during crunch time, I soured on him. Hey, Tony Gonzalez has carried the jocks of a lot of pedestrian quarterbacks during his tight end reign of terror. This is just another one for us to add to the list.

I also have seen numerous Chiefs fans — not just on this site either — trying to sell that Thigpen’s as good as Matt Cassel. Keep telling yourself that and maybe, just maybe, one day you’ll really believe it.

The reasoning behind this is always that Randy Moss and Wes Welker blow away what we have. Really? I mean, Dwayne Bowe and Tony Gonzalez, the best tight end of all time, aren’t a couple of scrubs. Oh, and only one of these guys made the Pro Bowl this year — Tony G. Sure, Cassel’s offensive line was better, but what about his backs? Kevin Faulk and a bunch of punks and nobodies? BenJarvus Green-Ellis? That sounds like a disease, man. Meanwhile, we had Jamal Charles and Larry Johnson for most of the season. I really don’t think Cassel was at that much of an advantage, especially when you consider that he had to deal with things like actual expectations and pressure, not to mention playing in a much, much better division.The AFC West was garbage last year, especially defensively.

Sorry, but Thigpen is just not in Cassel’s league.

Just read what Peter King had to say about Cassel today, from SI.com:

I’m surprised that a quarterback who played as well as Cassel did for the last 10 weeks of the season is being viewed by most people in the league as too risky to chart a long-term course with. It’s not often in free agency or in trade that a young quarterback with promise is available. And while I understand it’s a millstone around Cassel that he’d require probably two fairly high picks plus an average of $14 million-ish a year in a contract, I still think I’d rather have Cassel as my quarterback of the future than, say, Matthew Stafford. And the money’s not that much different.

Cassel is the real deal, folks. I don’t think anybody would be writing that about Thigpen if he was franchised or even a free agent right now. Then again, I can’t ever see a QB of his caliber being franchised.

Another thing I keep reading over and over and over again is shock that anybody at all is discussing the Chiefs picking or trading for a quarterback with Thigpen in the fold. Wake up, people! If you don’t have a very good quarterback, then you don’t have a quarterback at all. Period. Considering that quarterback is the single most important position in the NFL and we don’t have a good one, yeah, it’s going to be a top priority. Probably the priority. You can have all the Aaron Currys in the world running amok, but if you have a hack quarterback it won’t make any difference.

Am I being hard on Thigpen? No. Not at all. He had a prolonged audition that he never really earned before being thrust into the starting line-up. Our offense was 26th in the league in scoring. Our defense was 29th in points allowed, which means that we had to be aggressive on offense to try and keep pace. Suddenly, the ArrowSpread and Thigpen don’t look so hot any longer. Then you throw in his completion percentage, and it’s not looking good for Thigpen.

It’s never personal. I was hard on Brodie Croyle because I didn’t see him ever being a winning quarterback. He had a lot of starts, and could never win a game. Meanwhile, Thigpen has now had a good chunk of starts, too, and the only game he has won was that freebie up in Oakland. And that game was definitely a freebie. I know — I was there!

I really don’t care if all of Chiefs Nation agrees with me on this one. When it comes to quarterbacks, my track record — Brodie Croyle, Matt Ryan, etc… — speaks for itself. I am confident that Thigpen will not be our quarterback of the future. Very confident.

I also don’t think that there is any way men like Todd Haley and Scott Pioli are going to hedge their careers on Thigpen Smalls. Just writing that makes me feel a little ridiculous, actually. In case you forgot, the Herm Edwards era is over. The Pioli Trinity will bring someone in to at least compete with him. I guaran-damn-tee you that. If he wins the job, hey, more power to him. That would be a dream come true for me, as I’ve been waiting my whole life for the Chiefs to find a young franchise QB. I just can’t see it. Sorry.

The other thing I keep reading that irks me is this Aaron Curry is the “safe” pick, the “safest pick in the draft.” Makes me want to puke. Hey, the kid has a great story and is a phenomenal athlete. But he’s a middle freakin’ linebacker in a year when linebackers seem to be miraculously raining from the sky like frogs or something! Let’s get serious here. Is Chiefs Nation still so haunted by the ghost of Todd Blackhedge that we remain scared you-know-what-less when it comes to drafting or trading for a promising young quarterback.

What was that expression? Scared money don’t make money. I’m confident that The Pioli Trilogy realizes that. They aren’t going to allow the ghosts of Chiefs’ past or any wishful thinking to lead them down the wrong path.

Me? I don’t call the shots, but I’m liking Cassel and Sanchez more and more every single day (I still like Michael Crabtree as well, by the way). Hopefully, the Chiefs are, too, because these kids have the chops to become star quarterbacks in this league under the right guidance (ahem, Todd Haley).

P.S. - With free agency around the corner, and us almost certainly moving to a 3-4, I’m thinking these will be my top candidates when I drop my free agency post later this week, which will probably be another Blueprint…

ILB Bart Scott
DE Chris Canty
OT Khalif Barnes
Lance Moore is also a guy who’s very, very intriguing to me. I think he could become a star in Haley’s system.

A few things here.

#1) There were mixed reviews of Sanchez's performance. There were quite a few 'experts' that didn't think he did well at all.

#2) The interviews weren't televised, but his passing drills were... and he did poorly in those. And, that is what the fans in here were discussing.

#3) It is in the best interests of the media, especially ESPN which broadcasts the draft, to keep the top QB spot as compelling as possible. Anything to make us tune in on draft day.

#4) Mecca was saying that throwing at the combine woudl do nothing but help him because he had all the physical tools. I didn't see that in the few passes I saw him throw. Few would argue that he had a 'good' showing in the passing drills. At best he was 'adequate'. The guy is a project due to his inexperience, so I really want to see a superior arm, not an adequate one.

Hey, I'm no expert, just offering up a different view.

I still think Stafford is the only QB worth taking at #3, but that is JMO.

Mecca 02-24-2009 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 5521833)
I approve of Josh Freeman.

I'm sorry but Freemans hype is just ridiculous, he's big and has a strong arm but where he's at mentally leaves alot to be desired.

People talk about Sanchez inexperience in all of Freemans starts he still plays like he just stepped on campus...

I still wouldn't go pimping McShay as a great source he's one of the dumbest guys ESPN puts on the air, but the combine is what it is. It's what you're looking for so not everyone will have the same view. I personally wasn't impressed by what Pat White was doing yet everyone else seemed to be.

And yes no one gets to see any sort of interview or intelligence test, those are the things that Sanchez is good at and no one gets to see those.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521838)
I'm sorry but Freemans hype is just ridiculous, he's big and has a strong arm but where he's at mentally leaves alot to be desired.

People talk about Sanchez inexperience in all of Freemans starts he still plays like he just stepped on campus...

I still wouldn't go pimping McShay as a great source he's one of the dumbest guys ESPN puts on the air, but the combine is what it is. It's what you're looking for so not everyone will have the same view. I personally wasn't impressed by what Pat White was doing yet everyone else seemed to be.

And yes no one gets to see any sort of interview or intelligence test, those are the things that Sanchez is good at and no one gets to see those.

I am not sold on Freeman either. The difference is that I would assume that we would be taking Freeman no higher than our second round pick. (I would never advocate that we trade up for him)

That is much easier to stomach than taking Sanchez with the third.

The other thing is that Freeman doesn't have the surrounding talent or coaching staff that Sanchez does. It makes a difference.

There are a lot of guys that look great in college due to the coaching, and talent around them that never pan out in the NFL.

There are also a lot of guys that never look great in college because they are not put in the best position to win by their coaches and their teamates.

This is doubly true at the QB position.

Mecca 02-24-2009 07:59 AM

Why is it ok to blow a 2nd round pick on a QB but not a 1st round pick? If either one busts you just blew a pick with a team that is in a position that it needs both those picks to pan out.

InChiefsHeaven 02-24-2009 08:01 AM

Whatever, I'll trust the choices Pioli makes on this...

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:01 AM

As fans people saw him miss WRs that he has never thrown to (timing). Experts watch things like his feet and release and believe he is capable of being a solid QB in the NFL.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:04 AM

I was watching his feet and drop backs everytime....like right away when Pat White did it I was like he looks sloppy...

If you have great feet and mechanics you can have a below average arm and be fine, ask Trent Green about that.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:06 AM

Add that with accuracy and you are pretty damn good.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:07 AM

I would take a young Trent Green with no injuries for the next 10-12 years.

That's just me though.

EyePod 02-24-2009 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521869)
Why is it ok to blow a 2nd round pick on a QB but not a 1st round pick? If either one busts you just blew a pick with a team that is in a position that it needs both those picks to pan out.

It's because the 1st round pick would be used on that terrible QB named Mark Sanchez.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 5521894)
It's because the 1st round pick would be used on that terrible QB named Mark Sanchez.

As compared to the complete and total scrubs that are going to get picked after him?

Anyone and I mean anyone that tells me their ideal draft is Aaron Curry and Rhett Bomar has a screw loose.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:16 AM

I myself have thrown out many draft scenarios and Chiefs' fans go ape shit both positive and negative.

It boils down to there are people who are getting paid to know everything possible about these players. The Chiefs will pick the best guy in their opinion and some on this board will be cheering and telling you I told you so...rep rep rep. Other will be furious and talk about how Pioli and haley are the dumbest ever.

I have never been more excited about an offseason in years. I want to see progress on the field come September and they can sign and draft whoever to make that happen.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:17 AM

I think there are some things the Chiefs can justify I just don't see any sort of way to justify to me a LB in the top 3 picks that doesn't rush the passer.

Take Marcus Freeman in the 3rd round if you want a damn LB.

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-24-2009 08:17 AM

It's all moot because Sanchez will be a Lion

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:19 AM

I heard on movin the chains...that the lions will take top LT with pick #1 and a QB with #20

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521869)
Why is it ok to blow a 2nd round pick on a QB but not a 1st round pick? If either one busts you just blew a pick with a team that is in a position that it needs both those picks to pan out.

Well, I didn't say it wasn't okay to blow a first round pick on a QB. I just don't think it is okay to blow a 1st round pick on Sanchez.

Now, to the point.

If you sign a QB at #3, you lose the chance to draft another franchise type player.

Plus, QB's are one of the most hit and miss prospects in the draft. If you draft one at #3, you will pay him about 30 million guaranteed dollars more than if you draft one at the top of round #2.

Stafford is the only QB I see worth the risk at #3, he is the only one with truly superior talent, IMO. I know that you think that Sanchez has superior talent, but Pat White looked better throwing the ball on Sunday.

If I thought Sanchez was an elite prospect, it would be different. I just don't.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:24 AM

I didn't think Pat White looked better, all of his dropbacks were sloppier than hell and when he was throwing the arm strength throws I thought he looked like a little kid trying to throw a ball that was to big for him...he literally looked like he was trying to throw that shit with every single thing in his body.

And what franchise player are they going to take there? We can't use a hypothetical of one that doesn't exist, and Aaron Curry is not a franchise player either.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521884)
I was watching his feet and drop backs everytime....like right away when Pat White did it I was like he looks sloppy...

If you have great feet and mechanics you can have a below average arm and be fine, ask Trent Green about that.

You are full of it right now. Pat White did a phenomenal job with his footwork and mechanics. Even the hosts on the NFL channel said so.

Oh, and I thought we were drafting Sanchez because he has all the physical tools, not because he has a below average arm with great mechanics.

We can get those guys later in the draft.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:26 AM

Pat White already said he would play other positions, because teams are looking at him for the "wildcat". They think Pat is interesting due to his athleticism and that he would blow the wildcat up. Every comment about him being a fulltime QB is he is way too small.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521925)
You are full of it right now. Pat White did a phenomenal job with his footwork and mechanics. Even the hosts on the NFL channel said so.

Oh, and I thought we were drafting Sanchez because he has all the physical tools, not because he has a below average arm with great mechanics.

We can get those guys later in the draft.

Great way to spin what I said, where did I say he had a below average arm? He doesn't..

And I'm sorry no one is going to convince me Pat White looked great out there, he's a good athlete everyone knows that already.

He was not dropping back well, he's a midget and he was throwing his outs like a pitcher putting so much of everything he had in his body into them I was cracking up.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521924)
I didn't think Pat White looked better, all of his dropbacks were sloppier than hell and when he was throwing the arm strength throws I thought he looked like a little kid trying to throw a ball that was to big for him...he literally looked like he was trying to throw that shit with every single thing in his body.

And what franchise player are they going to take there? We can't use a hypothetical of one that doesn't exist, and Aaron Curry is not a franchise player either.

Okay, I am not going to let this spiral downwards, so I will end with this:

Curry will be a Pro Bowl linebacker. In the 3-4, he will slide inside and he is a bigger, faster, stronger Ray Lewis.

A Pro Bowl, potential HOF linebacker is much more of a franchise player than a bust at QB.

And, since I believe that Sanchez will be a bust at QB, I would rather have Curry.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:30 AM

Pat White does not equal Doug Flutie in terms of full time way too short QB.

I can see Pat White in certain packages being outstanding, but not full time.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:30 AM

I don't believe Curry is Ray Lewis.....so how about that?

I think he has a better chance of being AJ Hawk than he does Lewis...

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521937)
Pat White does not equal Doug Flutie in terms of full time way too short QB.

I can see Pat White in certain packages being outstanding, but not full time.

He's Seneca Wallace.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:31 AM

Curry / Sanchez...I will tell you who I'd rather have in 4 years

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-24-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521915)
I heard on movin the chains...that the lions will take top LT with pick #1 and a QB with #20


that would be wonderful. I really do want the Dirty!

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:32 AM

I still think you're better off taking LB's in the middle rounds, LBs are the RB's of defense you should be able to cycle guys in there and get production.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521931)
Great way to spin what I said, where did I say he had a below average arm? He doesn't..

And I'm sorry no one is going to convince me Pat White looked great out there, he's a good athlete everyone knows that already.

He was not dropping back well, he's a midget and he was throwing his outs like a pitcher putting so much of everything he had in his body into them I was cracking up.

I know that no one is going to convince you that Pat White looked good out there.

The odd thing is that Sanchez had mixed reviews, but everyone agreed that Pat White looked good other than you.

I think you like to act like you know a lot more than you do. You think it gives you some additional credibility. It doesn't.

It makes the less gullible people in here realize you are a fool, and talk out of your a$$.

But, hey, if coming off like you are some expert on a fans message board is what gets you off.... good for you.

It is one thing to have an opinion, it is another to act like an 'expert', when it is clear that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:34 AM

Oh yes I obviously have no idea what I'm talking about....you think that because you disagree with me.

I'm right far more than I'm wrong, my history on this forum speaks to that.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 5521943)
that would be wonderful. I really do want the Dirty!

They want to solidify the line to protect the QB. Have Culpepper start for the beginning of the season and have rook hold clipboard for a few games.

Face it...if they beat ANYBODY this year they have improved. ROFL

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521928)
Pat White already said he would play other positions, because teams are looking at him for the "wildcat". They think Pat is interesting due to his athleticism and that he would blow the wildcat up. Every comment about him being a fulltime QB is he is way too small.

I am not debating whether he has the size to be a QB. I was merely looking at their performance. And, on Sunday, Pat White looked like a much more polished prospect than Sanchez did.

That is something I would have never anticipated going into Sunday.

Clearly, I would RATHER have Sanchez. I think he has more talent than White by far. The point is that Sanchez had a poor showing. So poor, that Pat White looked better.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521953)
I am not debating whether he has the size to be a QB. I was merely looking at their performance. And, on Sunday, Pat White looked like a much more polished prospect than Sanchez did.

That is something I would have never anticipated going into Sunday.

Clearly, I would RATHER have Sanchez. I think he has more talent than White by far. The point is that Sanchez had a poor showing. So poor, that Pat White looked better.

How dare you question the experts!

jidar 02-24-2009 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521869)
Why is it ok to blow a 2nd round pick on a QB but not a 1st round pick? If either one busts you just blew a pick with a team that is in a position that it needs both those picks to pan out.

what? Why is it worse to blow $300 instead of $50?

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar (Post 5521955)
what? Why is it worse to blow $300 instead of $50?

Ok why is it ok to make Aaron Curry the highest paid player at his position before he plays a down then?

You don't get a shot at a top QB very often and some people just want to piss it away to rebuild a team that never won.

Gdaddy 02-24-2009 08:40 AM

Do any of you consider that the Chiefs will be trading down from the number 3 pick? I still think its highly likely that the Chiefs Swap with the NE Patriots for Cassel and we then draft at 23. Even if we do not trade with NE we still could be moving down to grab more picks.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521951)
Oh yes I obviously have no idea what I'm talking about....you think that because you disagree with me.

I'm right far more than I'm wrong, my history on this forum speaks to that.

Yes, I am sure it does. LOL.

Like I said, I don't mind having a different opinion, but it is clear you are talking over your head when discussing mechanics, and footwork.

Frankly, you talked about how wonderful Sanchez would do in the drills because he had all this 'talent'.... and talent and the arm was NEVER the question, and blah blah blah.

He gets out there and falls on his face, and I think you are trying to save face a little talking about how great his mechanics were.

Frankly, he had a much longer delivery than I thought he would have, and he didn't have near the zip on the ball that I expected. I was thoroughly dissapointed.

So, now you want to come off as an expert and discuss something that you don't think anyone will challenge you on.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdaddy (Post 5521960)
Do any of you consider that the Chiefs will be trading down from the number 3 pick? I still think its highly likely that the Chiefs Swap with the NE Patriots for Cassel and we then draft at 23. Even if we do not trade with NE we still could be moving down to grab more picks.

So I should be ready to give up on draft day......I got you.

If they really did that for Cassell I would literally lose my mind.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:42 AM

I think it is hard to trade the top 3 picks now, because it is so much money to sign.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521962)
Yes, I am sure it does. LOL.

Like I said, I don't mind having a different opinion, but it is clear you are talking over your head when discussing mechanics, and footwork.

Frankly, you talked about how wonderful Sanchez would do in the drills because he had all this 'talent'.... and talent and the arm was NEVER the question, and blah blah blah.

He gets out there and falls on his face, and I think you are trying to save face a little talking about how great his mechanics were.

Frankly, he had a much longer delivery than I thought he would have, and he didn't have near the zip on the ball that I expected. I was thoroughly dissapointed.

So, now you want to come off as an expert and discuss something that you don't think anyone will challenge you on.

And this is why top prospects are routinely advised to not throw at the combine, exactly what you're doing.

jidar 02-24-2009 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521958)
Ok why is it ok to make Aaron Curry the highest paid player at his position before he plays a down then?

You don't get a shot at a top QB very often and some people just want to piss it away to rebuild a team that never won.

Yeah I dunno.

For awhile I was operating under the assumption that Sanchez wasn't worth the #3, but I've been looking and now I'm trying to justify who IS worth the #3 and this is a hard question to answer. The fact is, this draft is so shitty that we should start it at pick #10.

What that means is that I wouldn't hate to take Sanchez at #3, but only because everybody else sucks too.

Of all the years to have the #3 pick...

warrior 02-24-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdaddy (Post 5521960)
Do any of you consider that the Chiefs will be trading down from the number 3 pick? I still think its highly likely that the Chiefs Swap with the NE Patriots for Cassel and we then draft at 23. Even if we do not trade with NE we still could be moving down to grab more picks.


First you need a trade partner going to be hard to find in a draft weak at the top.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar (Post 5521970)
Yeah I dunno.

For awhile I was operating under the assumption that Sanchez wasn't worth the #3, but I've been looking and now I'm trying to justify who IS worth the #3 and this is a hard question to answer. The fact is, this draft is so shitty that we should start it at pick #10.

What that means is that I wouldn't hate to take Sanchez at #3, but only because everybody else sucks too.

Of all the years to have the #3 pick...

Well atleast that is an honest opinion that you do realize an OLB isn't worth the 3rd pick.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrior (Post 5521973)
First you need a trade partner going to be hard to find in a draft weak at the top.

He's giving the Chiefs NE as a trade partner saying they are going to give up 20 spots and a huge point value for Matt Cassell...which makes me want to kill myself.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar (Post 5521970)
Yeah I dunno.

For awhile I was operating under the assumption that Sanchez wasn't worth the #3, but I've been looking and now I'm trying to justify who IS worth the #3 and this is a hard question to answer. The fact is, this draft is so shitty that we should start it at pick #10.

What that means is that I wouldn't hate to take Sanchez at #3, but only because everybody else sucks too.

Of all the years to have the #3 pick...

word....next year's #3 will be nice

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521976)
word....next year's #3 will be nice

Not if we want a QB it won't be, hell #1 won't be nice for that.

Chiefnj2 02-24-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521968)
And this is why top prospects are routinely advised to not throw at the combine, exactly what you're doing.

What is he doing? Observing throws that weren't accurate and didn't have great zip? I'm sure Sanchez is a smart guy, did really well in interviews, showed good leadership abilities and footwork. But, to say he threw well and the ball exploded out of his hand is just not accurate.

warrior 02-24-2009 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521975)
He's giving the Chiefs NE as a trade partner saying they are going to give up 20 spots and a huge point value for Matt Cassell...which makes me want to kill myself.

Cassell is not worth that IMO.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:48 AM

Exploded out of his hand.......were you expecting a JaMarcus Russell workout or something?

Matt Ryans workout wasn't awe inspiring either, I never said he possessed a howitzer arm I said it was above average and comparable to slightly better than Matt Ryans arm.

When judging someones arm you have to ask yourself is it good enough to play at the NFL level if the answer is yes than that should be the end of the question. The ball explodes out of Kyle Bollers hand how's that working?

Super duper arm strength is nice to have but it isn't required, who in the NFL that is a great player has a super duper arm?

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:50 AM

This is why


1 1 Taylor Mays FS Southern California 6-3 230 1 this dude is going to dominate in the NFL

2 1 Brandon Spikes ILB Florida 6-3 245 1
3 1 Jermaine Gresham TE Oklahoma 6-6 262 1
4 1 Russell Okung OT Oklahoma State 6-5 300 1
5 1 Colt McCoy QB Texas 6-3 216 1
6 1 Ndamukong Suh DT Nebraska 6-4 305 1
7 2 Trent Williams OT Oklahoma 6-5 309 1
8 3 Ciron Black OT LSU 6-5 328 1
9 2 Terrence Cody DT Alabama 6-5 368 1
10 1 Mark Herzlich OLB Boston College 6-4 238 1
11 2 Tim Tebow QB Florida 6-3 238 1
12 1 Trevard Lindley CB Kentucky 6-0 178 1
13 1 C.J. Spiller RB Clemson 5-11 193 1
14 1 Brandon LaFell WR LSU 6-3 210 1
15 2 Sergio Kindle OLB Texas 6-4 238 1
16 3 Sean Weatherspoon OLB Missouri 6-1 235 1


1 1 Sam Bradford QB Oklahoma 6-4 218
2 1 Eric Berry SS Tennessee 5-11 195
3 1 Gerald McCoy DT Oklahoma 6-4 295
4 1 Carlos Dunlap DE Florida 6-6 286
5 1 Jonathan Dwyer RB Georgia Tech 5-11 228
6 2 Jevan Snead QB Mississippi 6-3 215
7 1 Arrelious Benn WR Illinois 6-2 214
8 2 Marvin Austin DT North Carolina 6-3 305
9 1 Navorro Bowman OLB Penn State 6-1 228
10 1 Joe Haden CB Florida 5-11 185
11 1 Rolando McClain ILB Alabama 6-4 248
12 1 Bryan Bulaga OT Iowa 6-6 304
13 2 Everson Griffen DE Southern California 6-3 265
14 2 Dez Bryant WR Oklahoma State 6-2 210
15 2 Jahvid Best RB California 5-10 195
16 1 Rob Gronkowski TE Arizona 6-6 258
17 1 Rodney Hudson OG Florida State 6-2 295

penguinz 02-24-2009 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521925)
You are full of it right now. Pat White did a phenomenal job with his footwork and mechanics. Even the hosts on the NFL channel said so.

Oh, and I thought we were drafting Sanchez because he has all the physical tools, not because he has a below average arm with great mechanics.

We can get those guys later in the draft.

You are clueless. Sanchez does not have a below average arm.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:51 AM

1st group were JRs and 2nd group Sophs

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:51 AM

Eric Berry is a better prospect, and that's from me a SC fan.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521958)
Ok why is it ok to make Aaron Curry the highest paid player at his position before he plays a down then?

You don't get a shot at a top QB very often and some people just want to piss it away to rebuild a team that never won.

No, you don't get a chance to draft a top QB often. Just like this year, unless Stafford falls.

Aaron Curry is the real deal. He has been a multi year starter. He has the complete package. He is an ideal ILB in the 3-4. He is a non stop motor guy, a true leader on the defensive side of the ball. He is big and fast.

Sanchez has only one year of starting experience. Sanchez won the starting job in 07 before suffering an injury. However, later in the season Booty was injured and Sanchez was given the opportunity to start. He was yanked after three games.

John David Booty isn't Matt Leinart or Carson Palmer, if you know what I mean.

Forgive my skepticism regarding him. I just don't think he is a great prospect.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:52 AM

With Mays size and abilities a "good" DCoor will be able to do amazing stuff with him

ChiefRon 02-24-2009 08:53 AM

Here we go again. Same argument. Same reasoning, from both sides. Did we really need a new thread for this? How many of these threads do we need? Three or so every day until draft day?

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521989)
No, you don't get a chance to draft a top QB often. Just like this year, unless Stafford falls.

Aaron Curry is the real deal. He has been a multi year starter. He has the complete package. He is an ideal ILB in the 3-4. He is a non stop motor guy, a true leader on the defensive side of the ball. He is big and fast.

Sanchez has only one year of starting experience. Sanchez won the starting job in 07 before suffering an injury. However, later in the season Booty was injured and Sanchez was given the opportunity to start. He was yanked after three games.

John David Booty isn't Matt Leinart or Carson Palmer, if you know what I mean.

Forgive my skepticism regarding him. I just don't think he is a great prospect.

I think you should go into the rape thing again...you know just for the sake of doing it for the day.

And for all we know Aaron Curry could be Derrick Johnson, no one is safe no one is a sure thing.

penguinz 02-24-2009 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5521980)
What is he doing? Observing throws that weren't accurate and didn't have great zip? I'm sure Sanchez is a smart guy, did really well in interviews, showed good leadership abilities and footwork. But, to say he threw well and the ball exploded out of his hand is just not accurate.

You do realize that competing the passes in the throwing drill is not what they are looking for. They are looking for the ability to make the throw to that part of the field. The could not care less whether or not it is caught by the WR.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521990)
With Mays size and abilities a "good" DCoor will be able to do amazing stuff with him

He lacks ball skills....he could develop them and SC is supposedly going to use him in alot more roles than just a cover 1 safety next year but as of right now physically he's the best prospect as an actual player he's not..

Eric Berry has superb ballskills and resembles Ed Reed.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521977)
Not if we want a QB it won't be, hell #1 won't be nice for that.

You can't say that. Going into this year, no one considered Sanchez an elite prospect. Yet, after one good year, suddenly he is worth the #3 pick.

MahiMike 02-24-2009 08:57 AM

Actually, he's saying the same thing I have been - it's Cassel all the way.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5522002)
You can't say that. Going into this year, no one considered Sanchez an elite prospect. Yet, after one good year, suddenly he is worth the #3 pick.

I don't care if they throw 60 TD's, spread QB's are not elite prospects.
Now cue one of the people around here who loves Colt McCoy.....

warrior 02-24-2009 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5521991)
Here we go again. Same argument. Same reasoning, from both sides. Did we really need a new thread for this? How many of these threads do we need? Three or so every day until draft day?



It is getting old, we all get it SCF you don't like Sanchez we got it 150 post ago. :doh!:

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 5522004)
Actually, he's saying the same thing I have been - it's Cassel all the way.

You love you some shitty QB eh?

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 5521986)
You are clueless. Sanchez does not have a below average arm.

No, he doesn't. It was said to make a point. He brought up Trent Green.

That said, his arm isn't phenomenal either.

Mecca 02-24-2009 09:02 AM

You know who has a phenomenal arm...JaMarcus Russell, I see people make fun of him pretty much all the time..

Chiefnj2 02-24-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 5521993)
You do realize that competing the passes in the throwing drill is not what they are looking for. They are looking for the ability to make the throw to that part of the field. The could not care less whether or not it is caught by the WR.

Did you watch?

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5522006)
I don't care if they throw 60 TD's, spread QB's are not elite prospects.
Now cue one of the people around here who loves Colt McCoy.....

Someone else can come out of nowhere and have one good year and declare for the draft same as Sanchez did.

I know Sanchez was highly recruited out of High School, but he had done nothing until this year.

So, considering that you are willing to call him an elite prospect based on one good year, then who knows who will come up with a good enough year next year to be the guy you bang the drum for and say we have to take the 'chance'.

One year wonders happen all the time.

Mecca 02-24-2009 09:04 AM

I'd love for you to point out to me a 5 star top notch recruit who's playing in a pro style offense right now that is ready to declare after a great season..

Give me the example, I've even tried to go over that and it's just not there.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5522012)
You know who has a phenomenal arm...JaMarcus Russell, I see people make fun of him pretty much all the time..

I am sure the Raiders were talking about how they wouldn't have the 'chance' to draft a top QB very often.

Russell was a Junior as well, and had two years starting experience.

Mecca 02-24-2009 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5522023)
I am sure the Raiders were talking about how they wouldn't have the 'chance' to draft a top QB very often.

Russell was a Junior as well, and had two years starting experience.

And he's a great example of why you should be looking at a hell of alot more than just if the ball is exploding out of his hand when he's throwing the ball in shorts and a tshirt.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5522019)
I'd love for you to point out to me a 5 star top notch recruit who's playing in a pro style offense right now that is ready to declare after a great season..

Give me the example, I've even tried to go over that and it's just not there.

So, the one year of starting experience is fine so long as he was considered to be a five star recruit.

Okay, well that makes sense. I mean, those things are spot on.

Mecca 02-24-2009 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5522025)
So, the one year of starting experience is fine so long as he was considered to be a five star recruit.

Okay, well that makes sense. I mean, those things are spot on.

It helps......generally guys who burst on the scene like that were highly regarded recruits explaining their talent to burst on the scene.

penguinz 02-24-2009 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5522013)
Did you watch?

I did not see him throw but everything I have read said he had a good showing. I tried finding a video online but can't.

Consistent1 02-24-2009 09:13 AM

One thing that nobody mentions....I bet Sanchez hopes the Chiefs don't take him.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5522024)
And he's a great example of why you should be looking at a hell of alot more than just if the ball is exploding out of his hand when he's throwing the ball in shorts and a tshirt.

Absolutely, but you were the one talking about how great this kids physical tools are. They are above average, but not incredible.

Average height, average build, slightly above average arm, and above average mobility.

That isn't enough in my mind to overcome the fact that he couldn't beat out John David Booty. That isn't enough to overcome the fact that Pete Carroll says he isn't ready. That isn't enough to overcome the fact that junior QB's struggle historically, and I don't know of a single one that had only 16 games starting experience.

With the sexual assault allegations, and the fact that he blew off his parents and his coach in going pro.... I just think he is an arrogant know it all that will soon fall on his face and realize how little he actually knew.

It will be interesting to see who Pioli agrees with on draft day. You or me.

Mecca 02-24-2009 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Consistent1 (Post 5522040)
One thing that nobody mentions....I bet Sanchez hopes the Chiefs don't take him.

I disagree with that...the difference in say 3 and him going in the 7-10 range is so much money.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5522045)
I disagree with that...the difference in say 3 and him going in the 7-10 range is so much money.


I think that is an accurate statement. And, since he is only going to get the one big contract.....:D

Mecca 02-24-2009 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5522044)
Absolutely, but you were the one talking about how great this kids physical tools are. They are above average, but not incredible.

Average height, average build, slightly above average arm, and above average mobility.

That isn't enough in my mind to overcome the fact that he couldn't beat out John David Booty. That isn't enough to overcome the fact that Pete Carroll says he isn't ready. That isn't enough to overcome the fact that junior QB's struggle historically, and I don't know of a single one that had only 16 games starting experience.

With the sexual assault allegations, and the fact that he blew off his parents and his coach in going pro.... I just think he is an arrogant know it all that will soon fall on his face and realize how little he actually knew.

It will be interesting to see who Pioli agrees with on draft day. You or me.

The master of the spin, congrats.

I think you should go watch the Pete Carroll video I posted.

I also love how you think you know who or what he is because you read a couple of stories.

I pretty much disagree with your entire post but hey good job getting your sexual assault thing in you talk about that more than every other poster here combined do you have some kind of fixation?

Obviously you know more than the cops do even though you were you know thousands of miles away.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.