ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs sign Zach Thomas (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205760)

phisherman 04-11-2009 08:07 PM

Chiefs sign Zach Thomas
 
http://www.kansascity.com/news/break...y/1137526.html

The Chiefs have agreed to terms with linebacker Zach Thomas.

Thomas, 35, is a 13-year veteran who started 14 games for the Dallas Cowboys last season and has made 20.5 career sacks. He spent the first 12 years of his career with the Miami Dolphins.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:10 PM

Is this a joke?

If not I'm ready to see him get some concussions.

1ChiefsDan 04-11-2009 08:10 PM

print em!

HMc 04-11-2009 08:11 PM

that's strike 14! /hamas

DeezNutz 04-11-2009 08:12 PM

:popcorn:

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:13 PM

If this is true as shitty as we are at that position I don't think anyone is going to complain...oh and his sister is really hot.

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2009 08:14 PM

This would've been really cool if this happened 7 years earlier.Now, it's just an indifferent issue.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:15 PM

Sort of rules out Aaron Curry.

the Talking Can 04-11-2009 08:15 PM

this is about the locker room as much the field....fine by me

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phisherman (Post 5660779)
Thomas, 35, is a 13-year veteran who started 14 games for the Dallas Cowboys last season and has made 20.5 career sacks.

I know child workers in India who have made a hell of a lot more sacks.

Messier 04-11-2009 08:16 PM

Had 94 tackles last year. No harm to see what he has.

milkman 04-11-2009 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660808)
If this is true as shitty as we are at that position I don't think anyone is going to complain...oh and his sister is really hot.

And his BIL is an over the hill pass rusher.

Perfect for Pioli.

Rain Man 04-11-2009 08:17 PM

Does this mean DJ is moving back outside, or is he just going to be a backup? Or I guess maybe we'll have two ILBs.

He's listed at 242. Seems a little smallish for an ILB in a 3-4.

Either way, I like the exchange of Zach Thomas for Pat Thomas.

KcMizzou 04-11-2009 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5660819)
this is about the locker room as much the field....fine by me

Yep.

Messier 04-11-2009 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660818)
Sort of rules out Aaron Curry.

How?

rockymtnchief 04-11-2009 08:17 PM

Really? Ummmm...ok...I guess.

Rain Man 04-11-2009 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660825)
I know child workers in India who have made a hell of a lot more sacks.

The word on the street is that they think he has potential as a pass rusher and they can train him.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:18 PM

Holy Shit!

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660836)
How?

I can't imagine the Chiefs are moving DJ outside.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:18 PM

Zach Thomas just played inside in Dallas 3-4 last year so lets not act like he can't do that..

And you'd think it may rule out Curry because Thomas and DJ are both inside backers in a 3-4.

JohnnyV13 04-11-2009 08:19 PM

Actually, this is a typical patriot's type signing. Pioli stacked the LB position with smart veteran role players for Belichick. Somehow, I doubt Clancy Pendergast will use them as well.

Reaper16 04-11-2009 08:19 PM

Can't find anything to complain about with this.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660836)
How?

Because our two ILB's will be Thomas and DJ.

Hootie 04-11-2009 08:20 PM

I like it.

petegz28 04-11-2009 08:21 PM

I think him and Vrabel both bring great veteran leadership at a position and on a defense that is in dire need of some.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:23 PM

We have to get Raji or signing all these veteran linebackers is just going to look dumb.

With a nose tackle they'll be playmakers. Without one they'll be old guys getting killed.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:25 PM

Still kind of weird we cut Donnie Edwards.

Hootie 04-11-2009 08:25 PM

Really...

In my opinion...I just don't give a shit about #3 anymore.

We take Curry? Fine.
We take Sanchez? Fine.
We take Crabtree? Fine.
We take Raji? Fine.
We trade down? Super.

I'm just happy we're going to have a legitimate chance to compete in the West next year.

Braincase 04-11-2009 08:26 PM

Looks legit. Good guy in the locker room to teach the youngsters.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5660870)
Really...

In my opinion...I just don't give a shit about #3 anymore.

We take Curry? Fine.
We take Sanchez? Fine.
We take Crabtree? Fine.
We take Raji? Fine.
We trade down? Super.

This is really about how I am now too.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5660869)
Still kind of weird we cut Donnie Edwards.

He's done, he couldn't stay on the field last year and in a 3-4 his position is the same one DJ has to play.

Messier 04-11-2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5660850)
Because our two ILB's will be Thomas and DJ.

Thomas is starting? We know this?

milkman 04-11-2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5660869)
Still kind of weird we cut Donnie Edwards.

Why?

Donnie Edwards was never as good as Vrabel or Zach Thomas.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:29 PM

.................Page........................Morgan..................

Flowers........Vrabel...DJ...Thomas...Beisel..............Carr

......................Tyler....Raji...McBride.......................

Hali - backup OLB/3rd down pass rush specialist
Johnston - backup OLB
Edwards - backup nose tackle?
Pollard - bust

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660884)
Thomas is starting? We know this?

Oh yes I'm sure he signed here to be a backup on a team with one of the worst LB corps in the entire league.

Guys like Monty Beisel sign to be backups not Zach Thomas.

KChiefs1 04-11-2009 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5660819)
this is about the locker room as much the field....fine by me

exactly...Pioli is trying to bring in leaders.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660884)
Thomas is starting? We know this?

Die dumbass.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660888)
.................Page........................Morgan..................

Flowers........Vrabel...DJ...Thomas...Beisel..............Carr

......................Tyler....Raji...McBride.......................

Hali - backup OLB/3rd down pass rush specialist
Johnston - backup OLB
Edwards - backup nose tackle?
Pollard - bust

I don't think theres any way Beisel actually starts, I'd expect a drafted player to end up in that spot.

mlyonsd 04-11-2009 08:31 PM

I'm not so sure about Curry now.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5660885)
Why?

Donnie Edwards was never as good as Vrabel or Zach Thomas.

I'm talking about the veteran leadership part, I think Edwards knows hes a backup now.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5660905)
I'm talking about the veteran leadership part, I think Edwards knows hes a backup now.

It appears the Chiefs expect their backup LB's to be really good special teams guys if their signings show anything.

Hootie 04-11-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660888)
.................Page........................Morgan..................

Flowers........Vrabel...DJ...Thomas...Beisel..............Carr

......................Tyler....Raji...McBride.......................

Hali - backup OLB/3rd down pass rush specialist
Johnston - backup OLB
Edwards - backup nose tackle?
Pollard - bust

Dorsey?

We can't just write him off already, can we?

Messier 04-11-2009 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5660900)
Die dumbass.

So you don't know.

milkman 04-11-2009 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5660905)
I'm talking about the veteran leadership part, I think Edwards knows hes a backup now.

One of the things you want from veteran leaders is the ability to help players to learn to use fundamentals.

Donnie Edwards was never a fundamentally sound tackler, so he brings nothing to the table as a veteran backup leader.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:35 PM

Well linemen rotate and he'll play in 4-3 looks and I'm sure they'll see if he can play end in 3-4.

If we do take Raji however I'd expect Dorsey to look good in 4-3 pass rush situations since he'd be able to play next to a huge guy that can take out the double team nose.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660913)
So you don't know.

If Zach Thomas was signing to be a backup I'm pretty sure he'd pick a much better team.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660902)
I don't think theres any way Beisel actually starts, I'd expect a drafted player to end up in that spot.

v 2.0

.................Page........................Morgan..................

Flowers........Brown...DJ...Thomas...Vrabel..............Carr

......................Tyler....Raji....McBride.......................

Hali - backup OLB/3rd down pass rush specialist
Dorsey - backup DE/3rd down pass rush specialist
Johnston - backup OLB
Edwards - backup nose tackle?
Pollard - bust

We could maybe get a good 3-4 DE in the third round, too.

Messier 04-11-2009 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660889)
Oh yes I'm sure he signed here to be a backup on a team with one of the worst LB corps in the entire league.

Guys like Monty Beisel sign to be backups not Zach Thomas.

Monty Beisels are signed to play special teams. Zack Thomas can be signed to play quiet a bit, rotate in and out, to be a coach on the field and help young players.

Hootie 04-11-2009 08:38 PM

Surely we could trade Dorsey and eat the cap hit?

We could get a middle 1st for the guy...even a late 1st. You're telling me a team in the back end of the 1st round won't take a promising DT that doesn't fit our scheme?

I'd rather trade the guy than use him as a specialist. He's a top 5 pick for crying out loud!

Messier 04-11-2009 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660918)
If Zach Thomas was signing to be a backup I'm pretty sure he'd pick a much better team.

Maybe he didn't have his pick of teams.

Direckshun 04-11-2009 08:40 PM

YES.

NO AARON CURRY.

THANK YOU GOD.

Pitt Gorilla 04-11-2009 08:41 PM

2001 called. They want their linebacker back.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 5660939)
YES.

NO AARON CURRY.

THANK YOU GOD.

Thomas will teach Curry how to play LB! /true fan

MVChiefFan 04-11-2009 08:41 PM

It reminds me of when the Pats signed Junior Seau. He didn't play like when he was young but he gave them a couple of good years. I'm fine with it.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660929)
Maybe he didn't have his pick of teams.

What is the point of this argument anyhow? Is your heart that set on Curry or something?

Hootie 04-11-2009 08:42 PM

San Diego is obviously better than us on paper...

BUT...they have Norv Turner.

If we field a defense that doesn't suck, and finds the QB...we have an offense that can score points.

HOOTIE IS BACK ON THE AFC WEST CHAMPIONS BANDWAGON!

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:43 PM

I could see either way still....

----------Morgan----Pollard
Flowers------Curry--Thomas--DJ--------Carr
-----------Vrable-Dorsey-Tank-Hali

--------------Morgan----------Pollard
Floweres------Robinson-Thomas-DJ-Vrable-------Carr
---------------Dorsey----Raji----Tank

Pioli Zombie 04-11-2009 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660866)
We have to get Raji or signing all these veteran linebackers is just going to look dumb.

With a nose tackle they'll be playmakers. Without one they'll be old guys getting killed.

I agree. Raji and yes, this is very similar to the Patriots M.O.
Bryan Cox, Roman Pfifer, Junior Seau. Veteran leaders at LB. It doesn't rule out drafting young studs. But generally, the Patriots draft on build the lines and sign veterans at LB. Mayo was the exception.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:43 PM

The question we have to ask now is can the Chiefs win NOW?

Pioli and Haley are sending that message.

MVChiefFan 04-11-2009 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 5660940)
2001 called. They want their linebacker back.

ROFL

KCBOSS1 04-11-2009 08:43 PM

OH no.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-11-2009 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5660885)
Why?

Donnie Edwards was never as good as Vrabel or Zach Thomas.

But...but he was so CUTE! :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660888)
.................Page........................Morgan..................

Flowers........Vrabel...DJ...Thomas...Beisel..............Carr

......................Tyler....Raji...McBride.......................

Hali - backup OLB/3rd down pass rush specialist
Johnston - backup OLB
Edwards - backup nose tackle?
Pollard - bust

Goddamn you Wendler; you will RUE THE DAY! :cuss:

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:44 PM

If this team starts Tamba Hali as a OLB that is not going to be pretty.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660913)
So you don't know.

I bet your pussy is really hurting now isn't it?

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660963)
If this team starts Tamba Hali as a OLB that is not going to be pretty.

Him or McBride would be used like Miami uses Roth at OLB... Not my ideal situation though.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660963)
If this team starts Tamba Hali as a OLB that is not going to be pretty.

I'd honestly rather have Beisel starting at OLB than Hali.

Captain Obvious 04-11-2009 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 5660940)
2001 called. They want their linebacker back.

1999 called. They want their joke back.

Messier 04-11-2009 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5660946)
What is the point of this argument anyhow? Is your heart that set on Curry or something?

No, although I think he's the best player in the draft. Frankly I don't know what I'm arguing. I guess just that I don't think this signing means no Curry. Maybe it's me hoping it doesn't mean Orakpo.

KCBOSS1 04-11-2009 08:47 PM

I really don't understand this......at all.

Mr. Arrowhead 04-11-2009 08:47 PM

if this means no curry, than im all for it

Direckshun 04-11-2009 08:48 PM

I think this frees us up a bit.

We don't have to make ILB a priority in this Draft. We can focus elsewhere.

Which is great. ILB is one of the last positions you have to worry about when it comes to building a 3-4 defense. DL, DL, DL.

Messier 04-11-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Obvious (Post 5660976)
1999 called. They want their joke back.

Oh yeah? Well, the jerk store called...

Direckshun 04-11-2009 08:48 PM

I want Raji and Dorsey in the middle, BTW.

kcsam07 04-11-2009 08:49 PM

guys take a step back this signing has nothing to do with curry if we want him at 3 we get him thomas isnt a full time player at this point in his career and probably not even a starter he could be a mentor on the field to curry so again in no way does this affect whether curry goes to us

Tribal Warfare 04-11-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 5660939)
YES.

NO AARON CURRY.

THANK YOU GOD.

Trade down at mid to late 1st to get Barwin.

milkman 04-11-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 5660984)
Oh yeah? Well, the jerk store called...

Give me all your phone numbers and I'll call and tell all you dumbasses to shut the **** up.

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 5660979)
I really don't understand this......at all.

It's called our linebackers suck.

Hammock Parties 04-11-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 5660987)
I want Raji and Dorsey in the middle, BTW.

Works for me. But how much is the 4-3 going to be used?

Mecca 04-11-2009 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5660989)
Trade down at mid to late 1st to get Barwin.

Your unnatural love of this guy is starting to go overboard, he shouldn't be going in the middle of the 1st round, he'll be lucky to even go in the 1st round.

RustShack 04-11-2009 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5660992)
Works for me. But how much is the 4-3 going to be used?

If thats what our players are best suited for then thats what we will run most...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.