![]() |
Mayock predicts that the Chiefs will...
draft LT Monroe, the college teammate of current LT B. Albert of the Chiefs, and move Albert to RT and start Monroe at LT. See the video clip below.
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80f99143 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
well i would be more happy with this pick than drafting curry
|
Yeah!
I really, really hope we move one of the most promising young LT's in the game in an effort to get another promising, young LT. |
it's a great rumor for us though. hopefully it will increase the trade value of the pick. i'm hoping the bengals will give us their 2nd and maybe a conditional pick next year for the #3 pick to draft Monroe.
the bengals could really use a solid LT. |
Quote:
|
If we do that I hope Herm Edwards swoops in and gives Pioli a mushroom stamp.
|
I really think all this shows us is that the media still has no ****ing clue what is going on at One Arrowhead Drive. Gotta stir the pot, make up story lines and get people talking. Right now I would put it at: trade down 60%, Curry 25%, O line 15%. I obviously could be wrong, but I just can't see Pioli taking an OL at #3 with this draft being very deep at OL and Albert showing last year that he could very likely be the Chiefs LT for years to come.
|
Completely reeruned. Mayock should go ahead and shoot himself in the face...
|
When we were talking to Pioli to be our GM I remember someone said he was very interested in KC because they had some pieces in place, one of which was their rookie LT.
If that report was accurate, I can't imagine his first pick would be to move one of the keys to the franchise he saw before he got here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Tim Krumrie There are a couple... |
Quote:
The shitty ass defensive staff. Only the Chiefs would pick a DC and staff that's worse than Gunther and his might band of assclowns. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As long as they don't draft Dirty Sanchez, I don't care who they draft.
|
If we can't trade out this is the best pick. Those who think taking another potential franchise tackle is a bad idea don't really understand football.
|
Quote:
I think making it where Branden Albert leaves when his 1st contract is up is a brilliant move that speaks to understanding football. |
Quote:
|
Are people blind or something. How can they not realize we already have our LT,we don't need to draft another one at number 3.
|
Quote:
|
blows my mind that people think we should move albert...and spend consecutive first round picks on LT...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's a lot of money to invest in bookends for the next decade. I can see Pioli doin' it....IF, and it's a mighty big "if" cause I think there's a market for the Number 3 overall pick....IF they can't trade-down in the first.
If they trade-down in the first round, I can see them STILL drafting a RT or C to solidify the O-Line, though it wouldn't be a given... :hmmm: |
You aren't solidifying bookends for the next decade, you're doing it through the remainder of Branden Albert's contract, if Monroe works out. Once Albert is done, he's gonna go somewhere that sees him as a LT and he'll get LT money.
We can't give that to two players on their second contracts. |
I was actually on board with this plan a month or so ago, but Chiefsplanet talked me out of it. Now my board looks something like this:
1. Sanchez 2. Stafford 3. Orakpo (screw all of you who hate this) 4. Raji 5. Ev. Brown 6. Curry |
Quote:
|
Quote:
KC could offer Albert a 2 year extension right now for 9 million guaranteed. |
Quote:
It's not about the contracts in the end. It's about Albert actually staying here. If we move him away from LT, he's as good as gone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not giving up on Dorsey, yet, either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The guy will be paid as one of top tackles in the league at a time when there's probably a Rookie Pay Scale in place, virtually guaranteeing him of huge dollars. And what agent in his right mind would advise a client to do what you're suggesting? Answer: No one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you really think a rookie cap is going to save a lot of money? Assuming one is ever adopted it'll be based on what is paid now, with small increases each year. They aren't ever going to go back on guaranteed money. |
Quote:
So for example, let's say the number overall pick receives $10 million dollars in guarantees. The second overall pick would receive a fraction of that (say $9.9 million) and so on throughout the draft. What will happen is that teams will have an exorbitant amount of money for veterans on their second contract (as it should be). In that case, Albert would clean up. The owners have pretty much vowed to lock out the players until an agreement like this has been reached. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The owners are tired of paying huge guarantees to unproven rookies at the top of the draft. There WILL be a cap on the guaranteed money. |
smoke and mirrors.
They are trying to bait a team into moving up. |
Quote:
When pressed, the first thing the vets will give up is the n00bs. When Matt Ryan is getting P. Manning money without throwing a pass, that's ****ed up, and not appreciated by other players. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ROFL So, Matt Ryan getting a huge contract bodes well for free agents like Byron Leftwich? Uh, how does that work? |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Veterans use contracts of other players at their position when negotiating their own contracts. When unproven guys get 30 mil guaranteed, it allows proven QB's to use those numbers to ask for more money. Russel and Alex Smith had two of the top 5 total salaries last year for QB's. That affects how veteran QB's get paid - guys like Cassel who will get close to 15 mil this year. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.