ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football KCstar - Chiefs & RT (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=210019)

googlegoogle 07-07-2009 01:46 AM

KCstar - Chiefs & RT
 
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/story/1306438.html

Fire Me Boy! 07-07-2009 06:27 AM

From Kent Babb, Red Zone blog

Quote:

If I could look back and consider what I thought the Chiefs’ top needs were entering the 2009 season, they would be a little something like this:

1. Quarterback; 2. Linebacker; 3. Right tackle; 4. Wide receiver; 5. Right guard.

Speaking of offensive linemen, one of those spots is the most ignored position this offseason, a time when most of the above needs were upgraded. Even if they weren’t upgraded to the level they need to be yet, such as wide receiver, at least the signing of Bobby Engram improves the unit by a few notches over last year’s group.

In fact, here’s the list with some of the additions more likely to contribute in significant ways:

1. Quarterback: Matt Cassel; 2. Linebacker(s): Zach Thomas, Mike Vrabel; 3. Right tackle; 4. Wide receiver: Engram; 5. Right guard: Mike Goff.

You’ll notice that the right tackle position was not addressed, other than the fifth-round draft pick of former Missouri lineman Colin Brown. He’s expected to add depth to a shallow line, but he isn’t expected to become a starter any time soon.

The Chiefs bypassed most free agent tackles for some reason, most notably passing on former Pro Bowler Orlando Pace. Now, it’s possible that Pace simply had a better offer in Chicago, where he eventually signed, or liked the Bears’ chances of competing more than that of the Chiefs. But Chiefs general manager Scott Pioli should have poured massive resources into attracting Pace to Kansas City, enough of an offer that that whole competition thing would have seemed trivial.

One of the most important things the team needs to find out is whether Cassel can be its long-term answer at quarterback. As we’ve written before, it will be difficult to answer some significant questions if Cassel is continually having to compensate for poor pass protection, most notably from the right side.

To me, the entire offensive line becomes an enormous priority as a result of Cassel’s future. But that right tackle spot was largely ignored, and the Chiefs are a few weeks away from beginning training camp and risking the consequences of an imperfect line. At 32, Damion McIntosh might have another two or three effective seasons. Or maybe he doesn’t.

The Chiefs approached the draft with many needs. Branden Albert could be a future Pro Bowler, and he is capable of holding down the left tackle spot for the next decade. Right tackle, though, needed to be addressed this offseason. Kansas City passed on Eugene Monroe in favor of defensive end Tyson Jackson, and with the team’s problems on defense and coach Todd Haley’s desire to move to the 3-4, the Jackson selection might have been sound.

And maybe it’ll work. Then again, Kansas City thought in 2007 that another season could be squeezed out of an aging group of linemen. That didn’t work.

For Matt Cassel’s sake, the Chiefs had better be right.

Kerberos 07-07-2009 07:09 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Uh ..Yeah.. We already know this.

BTW this is pointed at the author not the messangers.

cmh6476 07-07-2009 07:21 AM

When you have 10 total sacks in a season, I think it's a little short-sighted to leave D-Line off your top 5 priority list.

And maybe the team thinks Herb Taylor is their guy, like I do.

kepp 07-07-2009 08:38 AM

Quote:

At 32, Damion McIntosh might have another two or three effective seasons. Or maybe he doesn’t.
When was his last effective season? Did I miss it?

Rooster 07-07-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5884289)
When was his last effective season? Did I miss it?

ROFLROFL No shit... I must have missed that too.

chiefbowe82 07-07-2009 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5884289)
When was his last effective season? Did I miss it?

by god i did to

Kerberos 07-07-2009 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5884289)
When was his last effective season? Did I miss it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rooster (Post 5884298)
ROFLROFL No shit... I must have missed that too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_CHIEFS_06 (Post 5884311)
by god i did to

Well he did effectively take up a roster spot that could have been filled with someone that knew how to run block and pass protect at the NFL level.

Micjones 07-07-2009 09:44 AM

The Chiefs are going to gamble on McIntosh playing well enough not to be a liability on the line this season.

I think he'll be about average as a pass protector. In the run game? Not so much.
Here's to interior and run left packages all season!

Cash Cow 07-07-2009 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5884406)
The Chiefs are going to gamble on McIntosh playing well enough not to be a liability on the line this season.


We are screwed.

Micjones 07-07-2009 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cash Cow (Post 5884482)
We are screwed.

I'm not as worried as some.
We've improved the Right Guard spot. That helps.
And again, I'm not concerned about McIntosh as a pass protector.
I'm concerned with his inability to be effective in the run game.

cmh6476 07-07-2009 10:16 AM

I know every coach claims open competition, but I just hope ours lives up to it because there is no way in hell MacIntosh beats out Taylor for the RT starting gig.

Micjones 07-07-2009 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmh6476 (Post 5884490)
I know every coach claims open competition, but I just hope ours lives up to it because there is no way in hell MacIntosh beats out Taylor for the RT starting gig.

:shake:

Herb Taylor is NOT a Right Tackle.
He's too smallish to be effective there.

L.A. Chieffan 07-07-2009 10:22 AM

22 ****ing guys bitches

cmh6476 07-07-2009 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5884500)
:shake:

Herb Taylor is NOT a Right Tackle.
He's too smallish to be effective there.

i disagree. I don't see how he could be any worse than MacIntosh, especially when he seemed to play well at LT last year.

Micjones 07-07-2009 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmh6476 (Post 5884525)
i disagree. I don't see how he could be any worse than MacIntosh, especially when he seemed to play well at LT last year.

He was under 300 pounds last year and after the conditioning program, I'm guessing he's under 290.

Not...a road grader.

Mr. Krab 07-07-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5884531)
He was under 300 pounds last year and after the conditioning program, I'm guessing he's under 290.

Not...a road grader.

In a spread type offense a road grader RT is not needed nearly as much.

Micjones 07-07-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Krab's (Post 5884581)
In a spread type offense a road grader RT is not needed nearly as much.

Our offense will be quite a bit more conventional under Haley I think.
And I honestly don't think Taylor's a long-term answer there.
He's just too small. I bet he's 285 right now.

kepp 07-07-2009 10:49 AM

Keep doubtin' Colin Brown

talastan 07-07-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5884591)
Keep doubtin' Colin Brown

This, I hope Brown shows enough in camp and preseason to put Sackintosh on the bench.

Buehler445 07-07-2009 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5884531)
He was under 300 pounds last year and after the conditioning program, I'm guessing he's under 290.

Not...a road grader.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5884589)
Our offense will be quite a bit more conventional under Haley I think.
And I honestly don't think Taylor's a long-term answer there.
He's just too small. I bet he's 285 right now.

I'm not going to go through what you, Dane, and I talked about in a different thread. But quick recap:
  • It isn't optimum, but if Herb is better than McIntosh, get his ass in there.
  • He is not a a road grader, but neither is McIntosh
  • If Herb is as talented as everyone thinks (he did pretty well when Albert was injured), it is dumb to only play him behind Albert. Especially when McIntosh sucked a fat dick last year.
  • Even if it is for a year, put him out there and make him earn it henceforth.

Optimally though, Richardson lives up to his talent and becomes a dominant RT.

Mr. Krab 07-07-2009 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5884589)
Our offense will be quite a bit more conventional under Haley I think.
And I honestly don't think Taylor's a long-term answer there.
He's just too small. I bet he's 285 right now.

I don't know about Taylor but i don't see how we can conclude that Haley will be more conventional when he gave up on the running game as much as he did with Arizona. If the passing game works and the running game doesn't, Haley is just as likely to go shotgun spread and only use draws and sweeps as he is anything.

cmh6476 07-07-2009 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 5884839)
I'm not going to go through what you, Dane, and I talked about in a different thread. But quick recap:
  • It isn't optimum, but if Herb is better than McIntosh, get his ass in there.
  • He is not a a road grader, but neither is McIntosh
  • If Herb is as talented as everyone thinks (he did pretty well when Albert was injured), it is dumb to only play him behind Albert. Especially when McIntosh sucked a fat dick last year.
  • Even if it is for a year, put him out there and make him earn it henceforth.

Optimally though, Richardson lives up to his talent and becomes a dominant RT.

this is my thinking as well. We know what MacIntosh has to offer, and at the tail end of a career at that. It's not going to be good enough in my opinion. I would rather see Taylor, Richardson or Brown get the playing time and hopefully one of those guys shows enough promise at the position to at least put MacIntosh's ass on the bench. Even if Herb isn't the long-term answer, maybe he can play the position better than MacIntosh would. And it isn't like Taylor is going to be able to ever play LT for us, that's what Albert will hopefully be doing for the next 5-7+ years. Let's see what Herb can do at RT. If he pans out then all the better, if not maybe one of the other youngsters can step up, and if not then you know you need to address the position next year.

Blick 07-07-2009 12:40 PM

Might as well give Taylor a shot at RT, but I don't think he's big and strong enough to block left ends consistently. He'd be fine in pass protection. But, left ends would eat his lunch in the run game.

Titty Meat 07-07-2009 12:53 PM

Taylor played good at RT

Blick 07-07-2009 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5885005)
Taylor played good at RT

in college.

He hasn't played enough RT for the Chiefs to make a good assessment of his play.

Micjones 07-07-2009 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Krab's (Post 5884878)
I don't know about Taylor but i don't see how we can conclude that Haley will be more conventional when he gave up on the running game as much as he did with Arizona.

He's gone on the record as having said he will tailor his scheme to the offensive pieces he has. We do not have the kind of personnel that Arizona does.

Micjones 07-07-2009 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 5884839)
[*]It isn't optimum

Why then would we force a square peg into a round hole and pretend he's a long-term solution there?

Quote:

but if Herb is better than McIntosh, get his ass in there.
That remains to be seen. He hasn't played downs at RT that we can assess.
And to assume that he'll play as well on the right side, in the NFL, is silly.
None of us know that he'll be able to make the transition without missing a beat.

Quote:

Optimally though, Richardson lives up to his talent and becomes a dominant RT.
That'd be ideal, but I wouldn't hold my breath for that to happen.
The guy doesn't have the right head on his shoulders to do that.

Titty Meat 07-07-2009 02:54 PM

Taylor played RT in pre-season he did good. If he does better then Mcintosh why shouldn't he be the starter? Haley said everythings an open competition

Micjones 07-07-2009 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5885306)
Taylor played RT in pre-season he did good.

He was so good in fact, he couldn't beat out the guy who had never played RT in his entire NFL career?

Titty Meat 07-07-2009 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5885316)
He was so good in fact, he couldn't beat out the guy who had never played RT in his entire NFL career?

McIntosh was the highest paid player on the O-line no? Carl & Herm weren't going to bench they'd look like idiots..... nevermind.

milkman 07-08-2009 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5885301)
Why then would we force a square peg into a round hole and pretend he's a long-term solution there?



That remains to be seen. He hasn't played downs at RT that we can assess.
And to assume that he'll play as well on the right side, in the NFL, is silly.
None of us know that he'll be able to make the transition without missing a beat.



That'd be ideal, but I wouldn't hold my breath for that to happen.
The guy doesn't have the right head on his shoulders to do that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5885301)
That remains to be seen. He hasn't played downs at RT that we can assess.
And to assume that he'll play as well on the right side, in the NFL, is silly.
None of us know that he'll be able to make the transition without missing a beat.

What Taylor does as well as anyone is get underneath the defender's pad and hold his position.

He uses leverage as well as anyone I've seen.

That is not ideal for the RT position because you want a mauler, a guy that can push defenders, maybe knock them on their ass on occassion and get into the second level and knock another on his ass.

But what he does well is still better than McSuckintosh.

Buehler445 07-08-2009 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5885301)
Why then would we force a square peg into a round hole and pretend he's a long-term solution there?

Who's pretending? Who says he has to be there longer than this year if (hopefully when) we get a prototypical RT worth a shit in there? This is a best of a bunch of shitty options deal. It's not a 10 year Pro Bowler type situation here. It's a stop gap, and I think he's the best one.

Quote:

That remains to be seen. He hasn't played downs at RT that we can assess.
And to assume that he'll play as well on the right side, in the NFL, is silly.
None of us know that he'll be able to make the transition without missing a beat.
Then why are you so against it? He could be significantly better than McIntosh who is pretty much the same profile (decent in pass pro, technician not a mauler) but who has shown that he sucks, is old, is declining and spent a lot of time bitching last year. MciIntosh sucks. Taylor is better at being McIntosh than McIntosh. Stick him in there and give him a shot. It's not like McIntosh is going anywhere.

Quote:

That'd be ideal, but I wouldn't hold my breath for that to happen.
The guy doesn't have the right head on his shoulders to do that.
Agreed. It sure would be nice though.
Posted via Mobile Device

Buehler445 07-08-2009 09:14 AM

I guess I just don't understand why Taylor isn't in. His big weakness is run blocking, but so is McIntosh's. And from what I've seen Taylor's pass pro is better than McIntosh's also.
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 07-08-2009 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5886793)
What Taylor does as well as anyone is get underneath the defender's pad and hold his position.

He uses leverage as well as anyone I've seen.

That is not ideal for the RT position because you want a mauler, a guy that can push defenders, maybe knock them on their ass on occassion and get into the second level and knock another on his ass.

But what he does well is still better than McSuckintosh.

This, this, a million times this.

Jawshco 07-08-2009 10:34 AM

Or...we cut McIntosh and sign ol' Wayne Gandy to be our stop gap for the year. We could probably afford it, and Gandy can play both RT & LT. I think it would be an upgrade.

RustShack 07-08-2009 10:42 AM

The only reason Richardson isn't starting or wasn't drafted high is because of his head. You have to think hes been working harder this year otherwise he would have been cut like Will Franklin.

talastan 07-08-2009 10:48 AM

I still think Brown is the best option IMO. He played RT at the college level. He has the size and strength. His technique is the only question mark being that he played in a spread offense and didn't use the three point stance very much IIRC.

milkman 07-08-2009 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talastan (Post 5887057)
I still think Brown is the best option IMO. He played RT at the college level. He has the size and strength. His technique is the only question mark being that he played in a spread offense and didn't use the three point stance very much IIRC.

I haven't seen any evidence that Brown's feet have been removed from the mud of his hometown, so unless Pioli and Haley saw something that makes them think they can improve his feet, I don't see him as a viable option at all.

RustShack 07-08-2009 11:47 AM

Richardson > Brown easy

Unless fans like to play players based on college, which wouldn't surprise me since Chiefs fans also prefer the good guy character over talent.

Jawshco 07-08-2009 03:14 PM

Wayne Gandy:
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/3486

Stop gap supreme! I think he's better than who we have right now.

evolve27 07-08-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmh6476 (Post 5884200)
When you have 10 total sacks in a season, I think it's a little short-sighted to leave D-Line off your top 5 priority list.

And maybe the team thinks Herb Taylor is their guy, like I do.

Forgot about Herb!! Haha.

kepp 07-08-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5887115)
I haven't seen any evidence that Brown's feet have been removed from the mud of his hometown, so unless Pioli and Haley saw something that makes them think they can improve his feet, I don't see him as a viable option at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5887202)
Richardson > Brown easy
Unless fans like to play players based on college, which wouldn't surprise me since Chiefs fans also prefer the good guy character over talent.

Its amazing how many experts we have here.

milkman 07-08-2009 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5887975)
Its amazing how many experts we have here.

JFC.

None of us are ****ing experts, but that doesn't mean that we can't see some things.

This is a place for us to express opinions.

Some are right, some are wrong.

You people that get butt hurt by our opinions need to take Mizzou dick out of your asses.

Chief Faithful 07-08-2009 04:01 PM

No matter who is at RT they are going to be better than last year just because Goff is replacing the worst RG that has ever put on a Chiefs uniform.

Blick 07-08-2009 05:03 PM

Yeah, Jones was one of the worst players I've ever seen.

I hope they give Herb a shot at RT. It'd be nice if he got McIntosh's ass out of there.

One problem with that though is our depth immediately goes to shit. If Albert and Taylor both go down with injuries...McIntosh would probably go in to play left tackle. Then, we would be ****ed.

KCinNY 07-08-2009 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kent Babb (Post 5884165)
Right tackle, though, needed to be addressed this offseason. Kansas City passed on Eugene Monroe in favor of defensive end Tyson Jackson, and with the team’s problems on defense and coach Todd Haley’s desire to move to the 3-4, the Jackson selection might have been sound.

First you claim the Chiefs have their LTOTF in Albert then you suggest using the #3 pick for Monroe to play RT?

Never mind that the Chiefs set a NFL record for futility is pressuring the QB last year.

You don't use third overall picks on a RT. A smart organization can get a good one in the middle rounds. Maybe Brown will eventually be that guy.

RustShack 07-08-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5887975)
Its amazing how many experts we have here.

I guess if not being a homer means your an expert, then yeah.

StcChief 07-08-2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 5884289)
When was his last effective season? Did I miss it?

it was in Miami. a few years back.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.