ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Replacing Gonzalez proving to be a chore in K.C. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=210255)

Quesadilla Joe 07-12-2009 03:27 PM

Replacing Gonzalez proving to be a chore in K.C.
 
http://www.profootballweekly.com/200...-a-chore-in-kc

Replacing Gonzalez proving to be a chore in K.C.
Posted July 11, 2009 @ 6:50 p.m.
By Michael Blunda

Nobody in the Chiefs' organization thought it would be easy to replace departed TE Tony Gonzalez, a 10-time Pro Bowler and surefire Hall of Famer, but they probably didn’t think it would be this difficult, either. In one of the more surprising developments of the team’s recent minicamp, head coach Todd Haley declared the competition for the starting tight end job wide open, dispelling the widely believed thought that the spot belonged to Brad Cottam. From what we hear, Cottam, a 2008 third-round pick by the Chiefs and the favorite to capture the job, struggled mightily during offseason workouts, frequently dropping catchable passes. His failure to seize the opportunity has opened the door for others — like veterans Sean Ryan and Tony Curtis and seventh-round rookie Jake O’Connell — to enter the mix for starting duties. Although the Chiefs aren’t expected to utilize their tight ends as receivers very often, the offense would be lacking without a skilled pass catcher at that spot. Thus far, Cottam has “dropped the ball.”

Hog's Gone Fishin 07-12-2009 03:30 PM

Getting rid of Tg was a ****ing stupid move. Stupid I tell ya. He has had his best years as of late and would have taken a lot of pressure off Cassel.

acesn8s 07-12-2009 03:31 PM

Oh no! The Chiefs will have to use their wide recievers! http://www.msnheaven.com/content/emo...scared0012.gif

King_Chief_Fan 07-12-2009 03:32 PM

that wouldn't be good to have Ryan or Curtis as your featured TE. I had hopes for Cottam.... not that he could replace Gonzo, bu that he would be good enough to be the featured TE. Anyone else have an opinion about Ryan or Curtis that provides any hope?

Hog's Gone Fishin 07-12-2009 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 5895806)
that wouldn't be good to have Ryan or Curtis as your featured TE. I had hopes for Cottam.... not that he could replace Gonzo, bu that he would be good enough to be the featured TE. Anyone else have an opinion about Ryan or Curtis that provides any hope?

Yeah, I have an opinion.

They suck !

googlegoogle 07-12-2009 03:42 PM

winning the lockerroom is key. More of salary cap is going to younger players because vets can be head cases and can ruin team chemistry. I think Haley and Pioli know what they're doing. He's a talent but our GM thinks his attitude effects the whole team.

the Talking Can 07-12-2009 03:44 PM

we aren't even trying to replace Tony....omg we don't have another Tony already on the roster! who knew???

but your cut and paste skills remain elite....

Cormac 07-12-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phuqtardphuqtard (Post 5895836)
winning the lockerroom is key. More of salary cap is going to younger players because vets can be head cases and can ruin team chemistry. I think Haley and Pioli know what they're doing. He's a talent but our GM thinks his attitude effects the whole team.

IMO, the best leadership comes from those who lead by example. Do we have another example of that on our team? Sure vets can be headcases but I don't mind HOF headcases who work extremely hard and take incredible pride in their body/accomplishments. Trading Gonzo sets us back significantly on offense, IMO. He's not a god, but he would have made installation of the new offense a hell of a lot easier, and helped build a lot of confidence in Cassell.

RustShack 07-12-2009 03:52 PM

If we wanted a great receiver at TE we wouldn't have traded him. Gonzalez replacement will come from the WR position.

Mr. Arrowhead 07-12-2009 03:53 PM

Todd Haley has said numerous times that every position is "wide open"

Mr. Arrowhead 07-12-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5895860)
If we wanted a great receiver at TE we wouldn't have traded him. Gonzalez replacement will come from the WR position.

This

Mr. Krab 07-12-2009 03:53 PM

Why do i get the feeling that KnoMo is really just a Chiefs fan that like screwing with people? He posts more Chiefs stuff than half the posters here.

milkman 07-12-2009 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cormac (Post 5895851)
IMO, the best leadership comes from those who lead by example. Do we have another example of that on our team? Sure vets can be headcases but I don't mind HOF headcases who work extremely hard and take incredible pride in their body/accomplishments. Trading Gonzo sets us back significantly on offense, IMO. He's not a god, but he would have made installation of the new offense a hell of a lot easier, and helped build a lot of confidence in Cassell.

Yes, Tony worked hard, but he was a selfish player and selfishness is never a good influence in a team atmosphere.

Deberg_1990 07-12-2009 03:58 PM

I will miss all the Super Bowl Trophies TG brought to KC....

googlegoogle 07-12-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cormac (Post 5895851)
IMO, the best leadership comes from those who lead by example. Do we have another example of that on our team? Sure vets can be headcases but I don't mind HOF headcases who work extremely hard and take incredible pride in their body/accomplishments. Trading Gonzo sets us back significantly on offense, IMO. He's not a god, but he would have made installation of the new offense a hell of a lot easier, and helped build a lot of confidence in Cassell.

not sure but having guys who don't want to be here for camp sends a tone to others.

these new vets Haley has signed up sets a bar for rooks.

RustShack 07-12-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5895880)
I will miss all the Super Bowl Trophies TG brought to KC....

I will miss all of his playoff wins.

Frazod 07-12-2009 04:13 PM

I'll miss how he never whined about anything.

Bowser 07-12-2009 04:16 PM

I'll miss Baja Fresh the most.

EyePod 07-12-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 5895799)
Getting rid of Tg was a ****ing stupid move. Stupid I tell ya. He has had his best years as of late and would have taken a lot of pressure off Cassel.

He did not want to play here. How long could he play for a team that was going no where? I'd have wanted out too.

Fairplay 07-12-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 5895791)
http://www.profootballweekly.com/200...-a-chore-in-kc

[B][SIZE="3"]Todd Haley declared the competition for the starting tight end job wide open, dispelling the widely believed thought that the spot belonged to Brad Cottam. From what we hear, Cottam, a 2008 third-round pick by the Chiefs and the favorite to capture the job, struggled mightily during offseason workouts, frequently dropping catchable passes.catcher at that spot.

How hard is it to catch a football. And TE's passes are generally 5-15 yard pass routes.

Embaressing. We need all offensive weapons seen as threats, not our TE as a blocking tool only.

orange 07-12-2009 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5895913)
I'll miss how he never whined about anything.

Don't worry, I'm sure there will be ample whining from the Chiefs in his absence. No team has ever had a shortage of that.

Fairplay 07-12-2009 04:34 PM

I hope Gonzo gets a superbowl ring, he certainly deserves one. Maybe Atlanta can do it.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 5895799)
Getting rid of Tg was a ****ing stupid move. Stupid I tell ya. He has had his best years as of late and would have taken a lot of pressure off Cassel.

Yea trading a old tight end for a 2nd round pick is a stupid. How many playoff games did the Chiefs win with Gonzalez?

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5895959)
Yea trading a old tight end for a 2nd round pick is a stupid. How many playoff games did the Chiefs win with Gonzalez?

how many playoff games have the chiefs won?

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5895960)
how many playoff games have the chiefs won?

None with Gonzalez. Only Chiefs fans would think tight ends are important. Can you even name the the tight ends of the super bowl teams? The last team with a stud tight end was Shannon Sharpe with Baltimore.

RustShack 07-12-2009 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5895960)
how many playoff games have the chiefs won?

Thats the point..

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5895963)
None with Gonzalez. Only Chiefs fans would think tight ends are important. Can you even name the the tight ends of the super bowl teams? The last team with a stud tight end was Shannon Sharpe with Baltimore.

less talent is always better than more talent apparently

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5895972)
less talent is always better than more talent apparently

You're right, a 2nd round draft pick has more value then a tight end. Second round picks are gold in the NFL. They are starters who are much cheaper then first round picks. Engram will fill in for Gonzalez on third downs and LJ will fill in for Gonzalez in the red zone.

RustShack 07-12-2009 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5895972)
less talent is always better than more talent apparently

I can't believe how much value people here give the TE position.

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5895985)
I can't believe how much value people here give the TE position.

i could give a **** about tes. engram is a monster we're set at wr baby

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5895985)
I can't believe how much value people here give the TE position.

But how else are we going to run Herms 3 yard at a time offense?

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5895989)
But how else are we going to run Herms 3 yard at a time offense?

herms not our coach anymore dude

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5895991)
herms not our coach anymore dude

So why do you want to stick with the philosphy of the tight end is important to an offense?

LaChapelle 07-12-2009 05:01 PM

If Jared Allen could do it, give Tamba a try.

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5895993)
So why do you want to stick with the philosphy of the tight end is important to an offense?

youre not too bright are you?

the Talking Can 07-12-2009 05:02 PM

1. You can't replace the best TE in the history of the NFL. The premise is dumb.

2. You don't build teams around a TE...unless, you're Carl Peterson and you're a stupid asshole and a failure. TE's are generally finishing pieces. If you have one great, if not, you can always draft one next year.

And trading Tony for a 2nd next year is the best thing Pioli has done since becoming GM. That pick will have incredible value for us next year when Haley and Pioli will have a much clearer idea about what our needs are, plus the pick gives us leverage to move up and down.

RustShack 07-12-2009 05:02 PM

It will be rare for TE's to see more than one pass come their way under Haley.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5895999)
youre not too bright are you?

This coming from someone who thinks trading a 33 year old tight end for a 2nd round pick is stupid.

BigRock 07-12-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 5895791)
http://www.profootballweekly.com/200...-a-chore-in-kc

Replacing Gonzalez proving to be a chore in K.C.
Posted July 11, 2009 @ 6:50 p.m.
By Michael Blunda

ROFL

Right out of the PFW handbook: taking something somebody said over a month ago (Haley's shocking statement that there will be competition) and trying to turn it into "news".

Deberg_1990 07-12-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5895985)
I can't believe how much value people here give the TE position.

heh. Chiefs fans will be complaining for years how we need a Superstar TE again. Even if we win the next 3 ships in a row, they will still complain. I cant wait.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5896001)
1. You can't replace the best TE in the history of the NFL. The premise is dumb.

2. You don't build teams around a TE...unless, you're Carl Peterson and you're a stupid asshole and a failure. TE's are generally finishing pieces. If you have one great, if not, you can always draft one next year.

And trading Tony for a 2nd next year is the best thing Pioli has done since becoming GM. That pick will have incredible value for us next year when Haley and Pioli will have a much clearer idea about what our needs are, plus the pick gives us leverage to move up and down.

The best post of the day

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896004)
This coming from someone who thinks trading a 33 year old tight end for a 2nd round pick is stupid.

comprehension is not your friend

RustShack 07-12-2009 05:06 PM

I'd rather focus on drafting a star WR than TE. Actually I'd rather get a star QB, RB, OT, OG, C, DE, NT, OLB, ILB, S, CB before I worry about getting a star TE.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-12-2009 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5895880)
I will miss all the Super Bowl Trophies TG brought to KC....

:clap:

Gonzales: "I've never won a playoff game"( boo-hoo-hoo for the 8-millionth time ).

ROR: "Keep your ****ing feet in-bounds, shit-for brains".

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5896014)
I'd rather focus on drafting a star WR than TE. Actually I'd rather get a star QB, RB, OT, OG, C, DE, NT, OLB, ILB, S, CB before I worry about getting a star TE.

Yea. I think Pioli drafted the franchise NT & DE this draft. If so this draft was a success.

orange 07-12-2009 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896019)
Yea. I think Pioli drafted the franchise NT & DE this draft. If so this draft was a success.

Who?

acesn8s 07-12-2009 05:09 PM

If throwing to the TE takes away from the WR then no matter how good the TE is the team is falling short of its potential. The TE should be an outlet for the QB or the play should be designed to catch the defense off gaurd.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5896023)
Who?

Alex Magee.

Just Passin' By 07-12-2009 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896029)
Alex Magee.

He's not a NT

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5896036)
He's not a NT

that doesnt matter to pioli. he will be the greatest non-nt nt ever drafted by the chiefs

Just Passin' By 07-12-2009 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5896039)
that doesnt matter to pioli. he will be the greatest non-nt nt ever drafted by the chiefs

He's not playing NT.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5896036)
He's not a NT

If we're playing the Zona 3-4 defense he is.

orange 07-12-2009 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5896039)
that doesnt matter to pioli. he will be the greatest non-nt nt ever drafted by the chiefs since Boomer

CYP

Just Passin' By 07-12-2009 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896042)
If we're playing the Zona 3-4 defense he is.

Not according to the coaching staff and the media, he's not.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896029)
Alex Magee.

He's an end in a 3-4...he's right around 300lbs.

RustShack 07-12-2009 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5896036)
He's not a NT

I'm curious why people don't think he can be, yet those people want Tyler to be. Magee is an inch taller and weighs about five pounds less right now with room to grow...

L.A. Chieffan 07-12-2009 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5896041)
He's not playing NT.

i just told you he was

orange 07-12-2009 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5896050)
I'm curious why people don't think he can be, yet those people want Tyler to be. Magee is an inch taller and weighs about five pounds less right now with room to grow...

There's been no indication that he's even been tried in the middle - has there?

Is this anything but wishful thinking?

FAX 07-12-2009 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5895985)
I can't believe how much value people here give the TE position.

Only because our best, most consistent player during most of the last 12 years or so has been a tight end, Mr. RustShack.

The fact is that a Pro Bowl caliber TE can be a tremendous asset to an offense. That's why guys like Ozzy and Shabbomofft were highly valued. We'll miss TG and the odds of us acquiring a player with that 2nd round pick that comes anywhere close to equaling his overall contribution to the team are slim.

I'm okay with getting younger, etc. I'm not okay with continually trading away our best players (see Drunko the Bull Runner) when we have precious few studs in the stable to begin with and the local villagers are storming the ranch with torches and naughty words.

FAX

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896046)
He's an end in a 3-4...he's right around 300lbs.

In a traditonal 3-4 your right but look at Zona's 3-4. He's 15 pounds bigger then Dockett and an inch shorter. He played both at Purdue. Meh either way if he contribute thats a nice 3rd round pick.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5896050)
I'm curious why people don't think he can be, yet those people want Tyler to be. Magee is an inch taller and weighs about five pounds less right now with room to grow...

Well we don't have one, no one really wants to hear how we're missing key pieces so we may go 3-13 or something.

RustShack 07-12-2009 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5896052)
There's been no indication that he's even been tried in the middle - has there?

Is this anything but wishful thinking?

I think Ron Edwards will be the guy this year, but I just think its funny that people who think Tyler should be but someone with similar size can't.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896058)
In a traditonal 3-4 your right but look at Zona's 3-4. He's 15 pounds bigger then Dockett and an inch shorter. He played both at Purdue. Meh either way if he contribute thats a nice 3rd round pick.

I seriously hope they don't think it's a good idea to run that Zona defense which was pretty marginal with much better talent than we have.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5896060)
I think Ron Edwards will be the guy this year, but I just think its funny that people who think Tyler should be but someone with similar size can't.

Well he was really fat once people remember that...

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896062)
I seriously hope they don't think it's a good idea to run that Zona defense which was pretty marginal with much better talent than we have.

Me either. Wade Phillips will be a DC next year yanno.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896069)
Me either. Wade Phillips will be a DC next year yanno.

Also going from cover 2 to any variant of the 3-4 is going to be an issue, we're going to see several guys who don't have a spot anymore.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896073)
Also going from cover 2 to any variant of the 3-4 is going to be an issue, we're going to see several guys who don't have a spot anymore.

You mean Herm lied about the team being 85% built? Dammit

FAX 07-12-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896073)
Also going from cover 2 to any variant of the 3-4 is going to be an issue, we're going to see several guys who don't have a spot anymore.

Quite a few, ultimately. Like ... maybe all but two or three.

FAX

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896074)
You mean Herm lied about the team being 85% built? Dammit

That was so laughable when he said that, several of those guys were shitty in the system they were drafted for.

We have no linebackers, our secondary is really marginal, Flowers is pretty good Carr I'm not totally sold on, everyone knows I think we need new safeties...comically bad pass rush and that doesn't even mention offense.

DeezNutz 07-12-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896081)
That was so laughable when he said that, several of those guys were shitty in the system they were drafted for.

We have no linebackers, our secondary is really marginal, Flowers is pretty good Carr I'm not totally sold on, everyone knows I think we need new safeties...comically bad pass rush and that doesn't even mention offense.

Bullshit. Two words:

Hall. EEE.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5896077)
Quite a few, ultimately. Like ... maybe all but two or three.

FAX

Probably but I was being nice I didn't wanna get into a major argument about it.

DeezNutz 07-12-2009 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5896077)
Quite a few, ultimately. Like ... maybe all but two or three.

FAX

Just another Mecca ball licker...

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5896082)
Bullshit. Two words:

Hall. EEE.

I hate Tamba Hali, If I was hired as GM I'd cut him 5 seconds after I was announced.

Titty Meat 07-12-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896081)
That was so laughable when he said that, several of those guys were shitty in the system they were drafted for.

We have no linebackers, our secondary is really marginal, Flowers is pretty good Carr I'm not totally sold on, everyone knows I think we need new safeties...comically bad pass rush and that doesn't even mention offense.

Really? I like a washed up Thomas & Vrbael more then Pat Thomas and whoever else. I think DJ might do good in the 3-4 and maybe if they just use Hali on obvious throwing downs. The Secondary yea I like Flowers, will be curious to see if Donald Washington is any good, and like I said before Mike Brown is a play maker when he plays.

DeezNutz 07-12-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5896086)
I hate Tamba Hali, If I was hired as GM I'd cut him 5 seconds after I was announced.

Thank you, everyone. It's a pleasure to be here. First, I'd like to say that Tamba Hali has been released. Now, regarding my appointment...

Hammock Parties 07-12-2009 05:31 PM

I think the title is misleading. We'll only know if it's going to be a chore when the regular season hits.

RustShack 07-12-2009 05:32 PM

I'm curious to see what Hali can do back at 250.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5896087)
Really? I like a washed up Thomas & Vrbael more then Pat Thomas and whoever else. I think DJ might do good in the 3-4 and maybe if they just use Hali on obvious throwing downs. The Secondary yea I like Flowers, will be curious to see if Donald Washington is any good, and like I said before Mike Brown is a play maker when he plays.

I'll be surprised if Vrabel and Thomas play 16 games but that's the nature of the position we're in.

This team is a major work in progress missing several key positions.

Mecca 07-12-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5896091)
I'm curious to see what Hali can do back at 250.

I'm going to guess that it will involve getting injured and some announcer talking about his "bad feet".

DeezNutz 07-12-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 5896089)
I think the title is misleading. We'll only know if it's going to be a chore when the regular season hits.

Actually, the title is one of the more obvious statements that I've seen made on this forum for awhile, well, at least today.

It's going to be a chore to replace the greatest TE ever to play? No ****ing shit...

Now, the real question is whether our new offense will necessitate a TE of this caliber. All money is on no, so it's a bit of a moot point.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.