ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs How many interceptions will JaMarcus Russell throw on Sunday? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214305)

Mama Hip Rockets 09-16-2009 08:24 PM

How many interceptions will JaMarcus Russell throw on Sunday?
 
?

Mecca 09-16-2009 08:26 PM

Probably not very many I don't see him throwing much and if he does probably the TE down the middle or RB swings.

Sure-Oz 09-16-2009 08:28 PM

Zach miller will own us

htismaqe 09-16-2009 08:28 PM

I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he throws any. In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he threw less than 20 passes.

Mama Hip Rockets 09-16-2009 08:28 PM

i don't understand how he only threw 8 last year. he is probably the most inaccurate quarterback i have ever seen.

RustShack 09-16-2009 08:29 PM

Well we wont be able to stop the run, or get any pass rush. So none?

Mecca 09-16-2009 08:30 PM

They let him throw safe passes and rely on the run thats how..

Watch their gameplan this week will be, run the ball, RB dumps the TE over the middle and the occasional play action deep ball.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-16-2009 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080018)
I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he throws any. In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he threw less than 20 passes.

I agree. He probably will throw around 20 passes. 17 of them will be off the mark, but fortunately for the fat man, his accuracy is so bad that he overthrows everyone by 10 yards.

Mecca 09-16-2009 08:31 PM

If you want to be concerned about something, McFadden's speed is very concerning.

Our defense is kind of slow if he gets a hole and bursts through no one is going to catch him.

KCChiefsMan 09-16-2009 08:32 PM

2 if they can catch the damn int's. 3 if Flowers plays

RustShack 09-16-2009 08:33 PM

Hopefully he isn't smart enough to know that if we blitz a safety he can throw it deep and burn our cover two CB's every time.

boogblaster 09-16-2009 08:33 PM

Hopefully the game winner for us late forth quarter ..

wild1 09-16-2009 08:33 PM

Cable doesn't seem like your typical Raiders coach in that he doesn't seem like a complete moron.

I would not be surprised if they just tried to pound the rock and Russell only threw when he had to. Maybe he ends up 7/15 for 100 yards.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 6080021)
i don't understand how he only threw 8 last year. he is probably the most inaccurate quarterback i have ever seen.

368 attempts with a 6.6 ypa. Of his 198 completions, 72 were to the RB/FB and 56 more were to Miller.

RustShack 09-16-2009 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogblaster (Post 6080033)
Hopefully the game winner for us late forth quarter ..

Page the Raider killer!

Mecca 09-16-2009 08:34 PM

I still say the Raiders should let him attempt some more bombs, if you can loosen a defense up at all with their WR speed and his arm their run game would open up more.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6080035)
Cable doesn't seem like your typical Raiders coach in that he doesn't seem like a complete moron.

I would not be surprised if they just tried to pound the rock and Russell only threw when he had to. Maybe he ends up 7/15 for 100 yards.

Last season against us at Arrowhead, he was 6 of 17 for 55 yards.

And we lost 23-8.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-16-2009 08:36 PM

Two Int's and a fumble.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6080039)
I still say the Raiders should let him attempt some more bombs, if you can loosen a defense up at all with their WR speed and his arm their run game would open up more.

The problem is that they have to at least simulate a threat that it might be completed.

Right now, opponents know him chucking it deep is like trying to hit a squirrel with a howitzer from 25 yards away.

smittysbar 09-16-2009 08:37 PM

His line is HUGE

Mecca 09-16-2009 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080047)
The problem is that they have to at least simulate a threat that it might be completed.

Right now, opponents know him chucking it deep is like trying to hit a squirrel with a howitzer from 25 yards away.

He did it in the last game and their WR's can fly...

Personally I'm more concerned with the idea of how the Chiefs can score on them, cause I'm not seeing it.

Marcellus 09-16-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 6080021)
i don't understand how he only threw 8 last year. he is probably the most inaccurate quarterback i have ever seen.

Because he is that inaccurate.

Nero's Neptune 09-16-2009 08:45 PM

well...if we do surprise them with some new blitzes, I'm afraid all our physically fit ends and linebackers will just bounce off Russell....

Buck 09-16-2009 08:46 PM

Hes only going to throw it 15 times.

7 of those passes wont be near anybody on offense or defense.
He'll complete 5 of his passes, 2 more will be incomplete, and he'll throw 1 pick.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6080052)
He did it in the last game and their WR's can fly...

Personally I'm more concerned with the idea of how the Chiefs can score on them, cause I'm not seeing it.

I understand that. But until they can make it work somewhat consistently, nobody is gonna respect it. They'll take they're chances, knowing that, at least for now, it's only a 10% play. I mean it's not just that he's inaccurate, they have some fast guys that have trouble catching the ball.

MahiMike 09-16-2009 08:56 PM

Zero. He won't need to pass...(

Marcellus 09-16-2009 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080075)
I understand that. But until they can make it work somewhat consistently, nobody is gonna respect it. They'll take they're chances, knowing that, at least for now, it's only a 10% play. I mean it's not just that he's inaccurate, they have some fast guys that have trouble catching the ball.

Flowers will also be on the field this week. Carr and Flowers are much better duo than SD's. I think Legget is OK as a nickel as well, much better than as a starter.

We just need to figure out how to stop Miller.

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6080017)
Zach miller will own us

With our weak ass safeties (Brown and Page) This could be a very big problem...

The middle of the field is wide open...

htismaqe 09-16-2009 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6080106)
With our weak ass safeties (Brown and Page) This could be a very big problem...

The middle of the field is wide open...

It's not just the safeties. It's our ILB's too.

Tiger's Fan 09-16-2009 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6080052)
He did it in the last game and their WR's can fly...

Personally I'm more concerned with the idea of how the Chiefs can score on them, cause I'm not seeing it.

Yeah, because the raider defense is a hell of a lot better than the Ravens.
We shouldn't score a single point.

Good god...

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080108)
It's not just the safeties. It's our ILB's too.

True...

Can Haley keep up tradition and lose 2 timeouts on the same bad challenge late in the game? Herm is so smart.

DJ's left nut 09-16-2009 09:04 PM

1.

He can't actually get the ball close enough to a wideout to get picked. Further, he throws the ball so damn hard that it tends to just fly wildly out of bounds rather than be intercepted.

I'm not even being sarcastic here, JaMarcus Russell is literally too inaccurate to even be intercepted, IMO. It's why he had relatively few last year.

LocoChiefsFan 09-16-2009 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6080017)
Zach miller will own us

So I should start him this week?

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 09:05 PM

JaMarcus Russell and Tyler Thigpen should have an inaccuracy contest to see who sucks the worse?

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LocoChiefsFan (Post 6080121)
So I should start him this week?

You have to ask?

Have you seen our inside LBs and safeties?

Mecca 09-16-2009 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LocoChiefsFan (Post 6080121)
So I should start him this week?

Uh yea, he's an every week starter for the most part.

Ugly Duck 09-16-2009 10:40 PM

Russell stats last 3 games:

27-16 win over Houston. 16 of 25 for 223. 72%, 0 INTs.
34-21 win over Tampa B. 14 of 21 for 145. 67%, 1 INT.
20-24 loss to Sandy Eggo. 14 of 32 for 218. 44%, 2 INTs (one a hail mary int).

Last game was an aberration... 1st game jitters & no Chaz. He'll get back on track against the KC WeenieBoyz...

keg in kc 09-16-2009 10:48 PM

You see him pass and wonder why they'd do it. You see us defend the pass and wonder why they wouldn't.

CaliforniaChief 09-16-2009 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6080035)
Cable doesn't seem like your typical Raiders coach in that he doesn't seem like a complete moron.

I would not be surprised if they just tried to pound the rock and Russell only threw when he had to. Maybe he ends up 7/15 for 100 yards.

Oh really?????

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hckDvqN9jHM&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hckDvqN9jHM&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Buehler445 09-16-2009 10:55 PM

****ing Zach Miller will eat our souls. Hopefully McFadden will fumble the ball away (some more) and we can tip a pass for an INT.

Mecca's right about our team speed.

chiefbowe82 09-16-2009 10:56 PM

who should i start...gonzalez or zach miller

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6080303)
Oh really?????

<EMBED height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=425 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/hckDvqN9jHM&hl=en&fs=1& allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></EMBED>

Herm is a sad sack of shit.. No freaking emotion after a great play?

I would like to see Haley vs Herm in a death match!

L.A. Chieffan 09-16-2009 10:57 PM

350 and 4tds

CaliforniaChief 09-16-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6080307)
Herm is a sad sack of shit.. No freaking emotion after a great play?

I would like to see Haley vs Herm in a death match!

Indeed. My biggest concern with Herm was that he diffused the rivalries by: 1. Talking about how he grew up as a Raiders fan
2. Fielding and coaching a sad sack of now unemployed scrubs.

I love Haley, and I would give anything to be a fly on the wall for his pregame speech, or any speech he gives regarding the Raiders and what he dreams about doing to them.

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6080310)
Indeed. My biggest concern with Herm was that he diffused the rivalries by: 1. Talking about how he grew up as a Raiders fan
2. Fielding and coaching a sad sack of now unemployed scrubs.

I love Haley, and I would give anything to be a fly on the wall for his pregame speech, or any speech he gives regarding the Raiders and what he dreams about doing to them.

Wells hes gone and Haley already has shown he cares a hell of alot more about the players and product on the field than Herm did...

Herm could sit in a padded room all day and just listen to himself talk.

CaliforniaChief 09-16-2009 11:04 PM

I loved Haley's reaction to the blocked punt. That was awesome. I can only imagine what it's going to be like when we win on Sunday.

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6080315)
I loved Haley's reaction to the blocked punt. That was awesome. I can only imagine what it's going to be like when we win on Sunday.

This..


Dude was thrilled and excited about the play.

Buehler445 09-16-2009 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6080307)
Herm is a sad sack of shit.. No freaking emotion after a great play?

I would like to see Haley vs Herm in a death match!

Dude. The deathmatch would last a good second and a half. Haley would look at him for a second, and just break the ****ass in half.

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 6080351)
Dude. The deathmatch would last a good second and a half. Haley would look at him for a second, and just break the ****ass in half.

Finish Him!!!!

Buehler445 09-16-2009 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6080369)
Finish Him!!!!

His first move would be a finishing move.

htismaqe 09-17-2009 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 6080294)
Russell stats last 3 games:

27-16 win over Houston. 16 of 25 for 223. 72%, 0 INTs.
34-21 win over Tampa B. 14 of 21 for 145. 67%, 1 INT.
20-24 loss to Sandy Eggo. 14 of 32 for 218. 44%, 2 INTs (one a hail mary int).

Last game was an aberration... 1st game jitters & no Chaz. He'll get back on track against the KC WeenieBoyz...

ROFL

I appreciate your zeal, but that's too funny.

Chief Faithful 09-17-2009 07:36 AM

If the Chiefs can't stop McFadden then Russell may not be asked to throw at all. But, if they have to rely on Russell's arm I'm thinking two interceptions.

Ugly Duck 09-17-2009 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080630)

I appreciate your zeal, but that's too funny.

Those aren't zeals... those are actual true real stats - I got 'em offa ESPN!

htismaqe 09-17-2009 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 6080829)
Those aren't zeals... those are actual true real stats - I got 'em offa ESPN!

I'm not disputing the stats themselves. But the sample size is downright hilarious.

You wanted to use his last 3 games to demonstrate that last week's game was an anomaly.

Let's take a look at the last 9 games (3x times your sample size) and you tell me where the anomaly is:

6 for 19, 31 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT
15 for 22, 156 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT
10 for 11, 152 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
10 for 28, 132 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
9 for 13, 68 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT
17 for 32, 242 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT
18 for 25, 236 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT
14 for 21, 148 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT

And then finally, the game you claimed was an anomaly:

12 for 30, 208 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT

Where's the anomaly again? ROFL

Dave Lane 09-17-2009 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6080122)
JaMarcus Russell and Tyler Thigpen should have an inaccuracy contest to see who sucks the worse?

Would that be a "suck off"??? ROFL

Mr. Krab 09-17-2009 10:04 AM

It depends on whether Flower plays.

HotRoute 09-17-2009 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6080022)
Well we wont be able to stop the run, or get any pass rush. So none?

:cuss: REALLY TIRED OF THESE "FAUX FANS"

just go watch tennis/golf or somethin

HotRoute 09-17-2009 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 6080926)
Would that be a "suck off"??? ROFL

more of a "SUCK FEST" - a one day festival/event for all to see, who can miss more wide open targets in one game, i'd say Jmac would win that competition
:D

Chiefnj2 09-17-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080919)
I'm not disputing the stats themselves. But the sample size is downright hilarious.

You wanted to use his last 3 games to demonstrate that last week's game was an anomaly.

Let's take a look at the last 9 games (3x times your sample size) and you tell me where the anomaly is:

6 for 19, 31 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT
15 for 22, 156 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT
10 for 11, 152 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
10 for 28, 132 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
9 for 13, 68 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT
17 for 32, 242 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT
18 for 25, 236 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT
14 for 21, 148 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT

And then finally, the game you claimed was an anomaly:

12 for 30, 208 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT

Where's the anomaly again? ROFL

I think it shows that Russel is so damn inaccurate nobody on the field can catch the ball most of the time.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6082017)
I think it shows that Russel is so damn inaccurate nobody on the field can catch the ball most of the time.


Yeah, if the fans could register INT's, he'd have about 107.

Reerun_KC 09-17-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC111110 (Post 6082016)
more of a "SUCK FEST" - a one day festival/event for all to see, who can miss more wide open targets in one game, i'd say Jmac would win that competition
:D

I dont know, Thigpen is pretty much dog shit as a QB, It would be a toss up.. Most likely they both would suck so bad, they would create a vaccuum in the universe and just disappear into space.


Thigpen is a ****ing joke...

Ugly Duck 09-17-2009 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6080919)
You wanted to use his last 3 games to demonstrate that last week's game was an anomaly.

Let's take a look at the last 9 games (3x times your sample size) and you tell me where the anomaly is ROFL

Oh... you mean those early games.... before Russell found his groove. Yeah - those games sucked. He finally came in to his own at the end of the season last year. Those wins (knocking TB out of the playoffs), thats more what you should expect now....

LocoChiefsFan 09-18-2009 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6080124)
You have to ask?

Have you seen our inside LBs and safeties?

Yeah, I know. My post was mostly sarcasm. Although, I did have him benched for some reason against the Chargers. Doh, cost me the game. Dumb nOOb, dumb!! *beats head against wall*

PRIEST 09-18-2009 04:44 PM

I say 3 Puck the raiders

Halfcan 09-18-2009 05:00 PM

I hope that fatass has a Ryan Leaf type meltdown.

Mama Hip Rockets 09-18-2009 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 6083039)
Oh... you mean those early games.... before Russell found his groove. Yeah - those games sucked. He finally came in to his own at the end of the season last year. Those wins (knocking TB out of the playoffs), thats more what you should expect now....

what in the holy ****ing ****. those were not good games. those were, at best, two mediocre games. 90 percent of the games he has played in the NFL have been completely and utterly horrible. two mediocre games do not change that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.