ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Tyson Jackson (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214574)

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:03 PM

Tyson Jackson
 
one tackle today WOW!!!!

DaneMcCloud 09-20-2009 04:05 PM

Come on, Dude.

He was a FAR better choice than Mark Sanchez.

Chiefsplanet says so!

:shake:

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:09 PM

I suppose-he got pushed around like an overpaid bitch today.

between Cassel giving the game away and the pussy play of Jackson-yes passing on the 2-0 Sanchez looks very stoopid.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:09 PM

He also had a forced fumble that we couldn't recover.

As a whole though, our DLine did their job today. If anyone would have said we would hold the Raiders to 67 yards on the ground and 166 total yards, I think everyone would have taken that. Jackson gets a lot of that credit.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093323)
I suppose-he got pushed around like an overpaid bitch today.

between Cassel giving the game away and the pussy play of Jackson-yes passing on the 2-0 Sanchez looks very stoopid.

If you want to see something that looks very stoopid, just read your own posts.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:13 PM

um, our dl was pretty good today....we held them to 70 yards rushing on 21 carries...after being told the raiders would dominate us and run for 400 yards

tackles and sacks are the lbs problem....


i'm all for complaing, but try the right targets....

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-20-2009 04:13 PM

I love this idea that the Raiders didn't run the ball because we stopped them. The only person that stopped the Raiders ground game today was Tom Cable. It's his dumbass fault for coming out throwing with the most inaccurate QB in NFL history.

BigVE 09-20-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093325)
He also had a forced fumble that we couldn't recover.

As a whole though, our DLine did their job today. If anyone would have said we would hold the Raiders to 67 yards on the ground and 166 total yards, I think everyone would have taken that. Jackson gets a lot of that credit.


Definitely. After last weeks defensive performance by KC and the offensive performance (running game) of the raiduhs I figured they would run all over and through us.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6093306)
Come on, Dude.

He was a FAR better choice than Mark Sanchez.

Chiefsplanet says so!

:shake:

who said that?

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093330)
If you want to see something that looks very stoopid, just read your own posts.

he had 1 tackle-what is there to be excited about

this was a stoopid pick

ArrowheadHawk 09-20-2009 04:14 PM

Why don't some of you bozos just go root for the fuggen jets.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093349)
I love this idea that the Raiders didn't run the ball because we stopped them. The only person that stopped the Raiders ground game today was Tom Cable. It's his dumbass fault for coming out throwing with the most inaccurate QB in NFL history.

But this teams defense is better they got Mike Vrabel and Tamba Hali is a beast!

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093349)
I love this idea that the Raiders didn't run the ball because we stopped them. The only person that stopped the Raiders ground game today was Tom Cable. It's his dumbass fault for coming out throwing with the most inaccurate QB in NFL history.

hilarious

if we didn't stop them on those 21 runs, who did?

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093349)
I love this idea that the Raiders didn't run the ball because we stopped them. The only person that stopped the Raiders ground game today was Tom Cable. It's his dumbass fault for coming out throwing with the most inaccurate QB in NFL history.

no shit a Manning or Brady would have picked us apart

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:16 PM

The chiefs certainly didn't stuff the run when it counted

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093349)
I love this idea that the Raiders didn't run the ball because we stopped them. The only person that stopped the Raiders ground game today was Tom Cable. It's his dumbass fault for coming out throwing with the most inaccurate QB in NFL history.

They ran the ball 25 times and threw 24 times, and many of those passes came on their last drive from behind.

They averaged 2.7 YPC. That is a good job stopping the run.

DaneMcCloud 09-20-2009 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093353)
who said that?

Are you kidding?

Where were you from May to July?

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-20-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093361)
hilarious

if we didn't stop them on those 21 runs, who did?

I damn sure don't remember seeing us stop them from running when it mattered the most.

Why don't you look up Balt's YPC on their first 20 last week. There isn't going to be much of a difference. If Oakland would have committed to running on first and second down, we would have gotten gashed.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6093369)
Are you kidding?

Where were you from May to July?

yes.....


i've seen lots of people argue cassel versus sanchez

but seeing how we already had a QB entering the draft, the point you're claiming doesn't even make any sense...

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093368)
They ran the ball 25 times and threw 24 times, and many of those passes came on their last drive from behind.

They averaged 2.7 YPC. That is a good job stopping the run.

They didn't stuff the run when it counted. Thats like when your mom goes out to the bars and does a good job at not getting ****ed til the end of the night.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093354)
he had 1 tackle-what is there to be excited about

this was a stoopid pick


If you expected a 3-4 DE to come in ad put up big stats, then you will most definitely be disappointed. However, if we can hold opponents, especially a team like the Raiders who had a top 10 rushing attack last year, to 2.7 YPC and 66 yards on the ground, then Jackson is doing his job.

DaneMcCloud 09-20-2009 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093375)
I damn sure don't remember seeing us stop them from running when it mattered the most.

Why don't you look up Balt's YPC on their first 20 last week. There isn't going to be much of a difference. If Oakland would have committed to running on first and second down, we would have gotten gashed.

I kept saying to TinyE today, "This is the dumbest play-calling I've ever seen".

ArrowheadHawk 09-20-2009 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093375)
I damn sure don't remember seeing us stop them from running when it mattered the most.

Why don't you look up Balt's YPC on their first 20 last week. There isn't going to be much of a difference. If Oakland would have committed to running on first and second down, we would have gotten gashed.

Which lotter numbers should I pick Miss Cleo?

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093377)
They didn't stuff the run when it counted. Thats like when your mom goes out to the bars and does a good job at not getting ****ed til the end of the night.

Good one, dipshit.

You prove what a dumbass you are with each and every post.

BTW, I lost my Mom a year ago. So you can use that joke on someone else, cumstain.

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093348)
um, our dl was pretty good today....we held them to 70 yards rushing on 21 carries...after being told the raiders would dominate us and run for 400 yards

tackles and sacks are the lbs problem....


i'm all for complaing, but try the right targets....

did you watch the last drive- our D line did not budge their O line and gave Jafatass all day to pass

that is two games in a row Jackson has disapeared when we needed him.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:21 PM

It wouldn't have mattered if the Chiefs drafted Sanchez this year anyway. The talent sucked Cassell played alright, this franchise won't win anything as long as Clancy Pendergast is a coach. New regime same shit.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093375)
I damn sure don't remember seeing us stop them from running when it mattered the most.

Why don't you look up Balt's YPC on their first 20 last week. There isn't going to be much of a difference. If Oakland would have committed to running on first and second down, we would have gotten gashed.

what do you mean when it mattered most?

they had no running lanes, we stuffed them all day...you saw it, we all saw it

when you hold a team to 70 yards and barely 3 yards a carry, you've stopped the run...period

the raiders won because of russel's passing on the last drive

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093378)
If you expected a 3-4 DE to come in ad put up big stats, then you will most definitely be disappointed. However, if we can hold opponents, especially a team like the Raiders who had a top 10 rushing attack last year, to 2.7 YPC and 66 yards on the ground, then Jackson is doing his job.

How in the **** did Jackson do his job???

did you even watch the game dumbass??

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093386)
Good one, dipshit.

You prove what a dumbass you are with each and every post.

BTW, I lost my Mom a year ago. So you can use that joke on someone else, cumstain.

I apologize I didn't know that.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093387)
did you watch the last drive- our D line did not budge their O line and gave Jafatass all day to pass

that is two games in a row Jackson has disapeared when we needed him.

our LBs suck

do you understand a 3-4?


for a rookie, Jackson played pretty damn well today....against an OL that everyone said would dominate us....

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093395)
I apologize I didn't know that.

Go **** yourself.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:24 PM

anyone saying we didn't stop the run today is a ****ing reerun

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093394)
How in the **** did Jackson do his job???

did you even watch the game dumbass??

Seriously, I'm not going to try to explain this to your stupid ass.

66 yards rushing.

2.7 YPC.

The DLine did their job.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093400)
Go **** yourself.

No **** you prick. If you don't want people talking shit don't act like a ****ing asshole. Like I said I apologized but you do deserve all the comments that get thrown your way.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093405)
Seriously, I'm not going to try to explain this to your stupid ass.

66 yards rushing.

2.7 YPC.

The DLine did their job.

Seriously did you not see the last drive? It doesn't matter the defense was in a position to win the game and it didn't.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093368)
They ran the ball 25 times and threw 24 times, and many of those passes came on their last drive from behind.

They averaged 2.7 YPC. That is a good job stopping the run.

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093407)
No **** you prick. If you don't want people talking shit don't act like a ****ing asshole. Like I said I apologized but you do deserve all the comments that get thrown your way.

Seriously? So this post:

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093368)
They ran the ball 25 times and threw 24 times, and many of those passes came on their last drive from behind.

They averaged 2.7 YPC. That is a good job stopping the run.

Deserved this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093377)
They didn't stuff the run when it counted. Thats like when your mom goes out to the bars and does a good job at not getting ****ed til the end of the night.


Alright. Like I said, go **** yourself. You're not worth the keystrokes it takes to respond to your ****ing bitch ass.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:29 PM

where'd everyone go?

i want to know about all this rushing "when it mattered most" that the raiders had??

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:29 PM

The Chiefs stuffed the run but lost on a game winning touchdown that was a RUN by Mcfadden. Hmmm

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093411)
Seriously did you not see the last drive? It doesn't matter the defense was in a position to win the game and it didn't.

The drive where Russell threw to wide open receivers? Yeah, I saw that. Now please explain to me what you would have liked Jackson to do on that drive.

Perhaps everyone should be directing this anger towards our vaunted secondary that completely folded when it mattered.

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:30 PM

Sorry Mecca called this one folks- dumb pick for that slot.

We WAY over paid for this guy.

Mecca called it!

kstater 09-20-2009 04:31 PM

It is pretty clear to me after two games that he's a bust. He should have at least 20 sacks and a forced fumble or two.

Reaper16 09-20-2009 04:31 PM

I was taking a shit and I thought to myself "At least no one is erroneously complaining about Tyson Jackson." So much for that.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093420)
The Chiefs stuffed the run but lost on a game winning touchdown that was a RUN by Mcfadden. Hmmm

really?

you that stupid?

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093421)
The drive where Russell threw to wide open receivers? Yeah, I saw that. Now please explain to me what you would have liked Jackson to do on that drive.

Perhaps everyone should be directing this anger towards our vaunted secondary that completely folded when it mattered.

You just answered you own question. The secondary sucked because the QB had all day to throw.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093430)
really?

you that stupid?

So we shut down the Raiders running but they still scored the game winning TD on a run. Thats not shutting it down if you lose.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093420)
The Chiefs stuffed the run but lost on a game winning touchdown that was a RUN by Mcfadden. Hmmm

Oh. You're talking about the pitch to McFadden that was run to the opposite side of Tyson Jackson. Brilliant.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:33 PM

As for the whole game like Hamas said it was a stupid gameplan by Tom Cable. Still the Chiefs didn't stuff the run when it counted.

munkey 09-20-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093387)
did you watch the last drive- our D line did not budge their O line and gave Jafatass all day to pass

that is two games in a row Jackson has disapeared when we needed him.

I thought you knew your football....:shake:

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093436)
So we shut down the Raiders running but they still scored the game winning TD on a run. Thats not shutting it down if you lose.

Did you watch the run? It was a ****ing pitch to the opposite side of Jackson. What the **** would you like for him to do?

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093438)
Oh. You're talking about the pitch to McFadden that was run to the opposite side of Tyson Jackson. Brilliant.

Keep moving the goal post ****tard. Which is it? Russell had all day to throw most the game.

tk13 09-20-2009 04:34 PM

Well, we certainly contained the run better than I expected us to, and most people expected us to for that matter.

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:35 PM

Douchey doesn't expect the #3 overall pick to get any push aginst one of the shittiest o-lines in the league.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093447)
Keep moving the goal post ****tard. Which is it? Russell had all day to throw most the game.

Tyson Jackson is a 3-4 DE. Please let me know what you don't understand about his position. He will probably NEVER be a huge pass rusher. That responsibility falls on the OLBs in a 3-4 defense.

And I am not moving any ****ing goalposts. You keep pointing to the game winning TD run. That was a pitch to the left side, away from Jackson. I'm sorry if your stupid ass can't understand this.

kstater 09-20-2009 04:36 PM

Wait, Oakland has a horrible OL now? Interesting.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6093457)
Wait, Oakland has a horrible OL now? Interesting.

Yeah, funny how that works.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-20-2009 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093419)
where'd everyone go?

i want to know about all this rushing "when it mattered most" that the raiders had??

How about that toss sweep where DMC walked into the ****ing end zone, dipshit.

munkey 09-20-2009 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093441)
As for the whole game like Hamas said it was a stupid gameplan by Tom Cable. Still the Chiefs didn't stuff the run when it counted.

When does it "count"? seriously...1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th QT..?

The last defensive series I blame on coaching...not players...it was an abortion imo. We might as well bring back Gunther...

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093459)
How about that toss sweep where DMC walked into the ****ing end zone, dipshit.

TO THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE PERSON THIS THREAD IS ABOUT. WHAT IS HARD TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THIS?

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093455)
Tyson Jackson is a 3-4 DE. Please let me know what you don't understand about his position. He will probably NEVER be a huge pass rusher. That responsibility falls on the OLBs in a 3-4 defense.

And I am not moving any ****ing goalposts. You keep pointing to the game winning TD run. That was a pitch to the left side, away from Jackson. I'm sorry if your stupid ass can't understand this.

So you spend a #3 pick on a D-end in the 3-4 when you had the record setting worst pass rush in the NFL?

You were refering to the whole team stuffing the run and I pointed out the Raiders scored the game winning touchdown running the ball.

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by munkey (Post 6093443)
I thought you knew your football....:shake:

sorry I guess I expected at least some production for that HUGE payday he just cashed in.

1 tackle

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093436)
So we shut down the Raiders running but they still scored the game winning TD on a run. Thats not shutting it down if you lose.

so you are that stupid....got it

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093470)
so you are that stupid....got it

You've been pwnt by life so its not really worth explaining to you. You can't say the Chiefs stuff the run only to lose the game on a running play.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093462)
So you spend a #3 pick on a D-end in the 3-4 when you had the record setting worst pass rush in the NFL?

You were refering to the whole team stuffing the run and I pointed out the Raiders scored the game winning touchdown running the ball.

We also couldn't stop the run at all last year. So we picked a guy that could help us with that. And we did stop the run much better today. Certainly much better than anyone on this board thought we would.

And when I was referring to the Chiefs stopping the run today, it is in relation to Tyson Jackson doing his job. Obviously he isn't going to make a difference on a short pitch to the opposite side. Not unless he has a rocket up his ass.

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by munkey (Post 6093460)
When does it "count"? seriously...1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th QT..?

The last defensive series I blame on coaching...not players...it was an abortion imo. We might as well bring back Gunther...

Now THIS I agree with- we played the prevent and our safeties looked lost back there.

We rushed only 4 that whole series and the line including (Action Jackson) went up against a wall.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:41 PM

This place is clownshoes.

kstater 09-20-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093475)
You've been pwnt by life so its not really worth explaining to you. You can't say the Chiefs stuff the run only to lose the game on a running play.


So say they had limited the Raiders to 1 yard rushing. But that 1 yard was the TD run, they didn't stop the run game?

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6093478)
We also couldn't stop the run at all last year. So we picked a guy that could help us with that. And we did stop the run much better today. Certainly much better than anyone on this board thought we would.

And when I was referring to the Chiefs stopping the run today, it is in relation to Tyson Jackson doing his job. Obviously he isn't going to make a difference on a short pitch to the opposite side. Not unless he has a rocket up his ass.

So instead of drafting Donald Washington there wasn't a guy in the 4th round who could play aginst the run? This team is 7 million under the cap floor too. They could have overpayed for a guy like Greg Ellis instead they did nothing.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6093459)
How about that toss sweep where DMC walked into the ****ing end zone, dipshit.

really, 1 5 yard run means we didn't stop the run?

every play on that series was a pass......they won because of passing

this is the dishonest argument you are really going to make? that 1 play means we didn't stop the run, even though we clearly did?


70 yards on 21 carries isn't stopping the run, if one run is a td


holy shit

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6093484)
So say they had limited the Raiders to 1 yard rushing. But that 1 yard was the TD run, they didn't stop the run game?

Now you're reaching.

the Talking Can 09-20-2009 04:42 PM

i thought you were more honest than that hamas....


that is grade school nonsense....at least i knew what's going on now

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6093486)
really, 1 5 yard run means we didn't stop the run?

every play on that series was a pass......they won because of passing

this is the dishonest argument you are really going to make? that 1 play means we didn't stop the run, even though we clearly did?


70 yards on 21 carries isn't stopping the run, if one run is a td


holy shit

If they stopped the run that would mean they stopped Mcfadden and probably would have won the game. They didn't and they lost. Thats not stopping the run.

munkey 09-20-2009 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093467)
sorry I guess I expected at least some production for that HUGE payday he just cashed in.

1 tackle

It's his first year...I personally think it's refreshing to see a rookie start...AND

He's a "contain" type player and from the rushing yards the raiders put up I think he did his job.

kstater 09-20-2009 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093487)
Now you're reaching.

So where do you draw the line? 1 yard, 50 yards, 70 yards?

Halfcan 09-20-2009 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093453)
Douchey doesn't expect the #3 overall pick to get any push aginst one of the shittiest o-lines in the league.

ROFL I expect more than one tackle and to be pushed around like a bitch when the game is on the line.

Dorsey stepped it up a bit. Maybe it is going to just take a couple of years to get anything out of this guy. Or maybe he is the next Ryan Simms-he looked like Simms today,

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6093494)
So where do you draw the line? 1 yard, 50 yards, 70 yards?

When the runningback goes untouched for the game winning touchdown

kcxiv 09-20-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093387)
did you watch the last drive- our D line did not budge their O line and gave Jafatass all day to pass

that is two games in a row Jackson has disapeared when we needed him.

cuause we were in prevent and rushed 3 if that. lol

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093497)
ROFL I expect more than one tackle and to be pushed around like a bitch when the game is on the line.

Dorsey stepped it up a bit. Maybe it is going to just take a couple of years to get anything out of this guy. Or maybe he is the next Ryan Simms-he looked like Simms today,

Thing is Jackson will be a solid player but this team needs playmakers thats pretty obvious and you're telling me with the # 3 pick you couldn't find a play maker? Or 7 million under the cap floor you couldn't overpay for a playmaker?

kcxiv 09-20-2009 04:45 PM

I remember when Mario Williams was drafted and well, he was horrible his first year and a half, then uh oh.

munkey 09-20-2009 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6093491)
If they stopped the run that would mean they stopped Mcfadden and probably would have won the game. They didn't and they lost. Thats not stopping the run.

Now that's just plain reeruned...I seriously don't know what else to say...sheesh.

doomy3 09-20-2009 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 6093497)
ROFL I expect more than one tackle and to be pushed around like a bitch when the game is on the line.

Dorsey stepped it up a bit. Maybe it is going to just take a couple of years to get anything out of this guy. Or maybe he is the next Ryan Simms-he looked like Simms today,

Just out of curiosity, in what way did Dorsey step it up when Jackson was apparently "getting pushed around" all day.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.