ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why? Just Why, why, why... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215684)

RedThat 10-06-2009 11:33 AM

Why? Just Why, why, why...
 
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

Crashride 10-06-2009 11:36 AM

Of course some of us will be mad. Do you see how well he plays? DUH. We let one of the best ends in the NFL get away.

L.A. Chieffan 10-06-2009 11:38 AM

many people were defending the trade before and when it happened. if you WANTED him to be traded then you should be castrated. thats why people are still a little bitter

raybec 4 10-06-2009 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

Of course his desire not to be here had NOTHING at all to do with Carl. Yeah, right.

jspchief 10-06-2009 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

And do you know why he didn't want to be here?

RedThat 10-06-2009 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crashride (Post 6145355)
Of course some of us will be mad. Do you see how well he plays? DUH. We let one of the best ends in the NFL get away.

I know and realize that, but what can you do? It's unfortunate. I hated to see him go, my point is its done. It's the past. Complaining, blaming Peterson is no sense. Im more mad at the suckiness this franchise is offerring us right now.

BigRedChief 10-06-2009 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

WTH jeeezzz you don't understand? The King Carl hatred runs deep. It hasn't went away. We can't sniff a QB sack and we see the exact thing we need in prime time tearing it up and realize we already had what we need and those DAMNIT CARL! :cuss: feeling emerge. Whats so hard to understand about that?

Jared didn't want to be here because of King Carl. It was all on King Carl. No matter that you get in return you can never get full value for a pro bowl DE in his prime. They are as valuable as most starting NFL QB's.

RedThat 10-06-2009 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 6145369)
And do you know why he didn't want to be here?

because this organization is sh*t from ownership down.

ChiefsCountry 10-06-2009 11:41 AM

If the dumb **** didn't have a drinking problem, Carl probably would have paid the bitch. Its 50/50 on both parties in this case.

L.A. Chieffan 10-06-2009 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6145376)
If the dumb **** didn't have a drinking problem, Carl probably would have paid the bitch. Its 50/50 on both parties in this case.

Carl could care less if jared liked to get drunk. it was merely a tool to be used for leverage

Bane 10-06-2009 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

I agree that it doesn't matter now,but Jared Allen said he would sign a long term deal if Carl didn't hit him with the franchise tag .Too late now,yes,but a deal could have been reached between the Chiefs and Jared Allen.
Posted via Mobile Device

RedThat 10-06-2009 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6145376)
If the dumb **** didn't have a drinking problem, Carl probably would have paid the bitch. Its 50/50 on both parties in this case.

His drinking problem has been clean thus far.

wild1 10-06-2009 11:44 AM

I could care less about the Minnesota Vikings' right defensive end. I don't see what he has to do with the Chiefs' future.

Hammock Parties 10-06-2009 11:44 AM

Jared didn't want to be here but he started a bar here.

Makes sense. :rolleyes:

Carl ****ed up....plain and simple.

OnTheWarpath15 10-06-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6145376)
If the dumb **** didn't have a drinking problem, Carl probably would have paid the bitch. Its 50/50 on both parties in this case.

This.

Personally, I could give a shit.

I'm much more concerned with the issues at hand now, like the $60M QB that is averaging 150 ****ing yards a game.

ChiefsCountry 10-06-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6145383)
I could care less about the Minnesota Vikings' right defensive end. I don't see what he has to do with the Chiefs' future.

Branden Albert and whoever we draft to rush the passer. ;)

htismaqe 10-06-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6145386)
This.

Personally, I could give a shit.

I'm much more concerned with the issues at hand now, like the $60M QB that is averaging 150 ****ing yards a game.

145.

:doh!:

Bill Lundberg 10-06-2009 11:46 AM

Besides who gives a shit what he wanted. Franchise him until he signs a long term deal. We got rooked plain and simple.

LaChapelle 10-06-2009 11:49 AM

I believe the Allen trade got Carl's ass out of here a little quicker. Clark said you ****ed up and I can'f fix it, you're out of here Carl. Course I also believe Tony G is gone because Clark granted him the trade he wanted.

gblowfish 10-06-2009 11:49 AM

I'm happy for Allen, just like I'm happy for TG that they got to go play for a legit team with a real shot at a Super Bowl. We're several years away from building anything here. No reason to cry over these guys going somewhere else. That's just the way it is.

DaWolf 10-06-2009 11:51 AM

1) Jared had an issue with Carl because Carl promised him a deal and then backed off. Standard procedure for Carl. Jared had no issues with Kansas City.

2) Even if he wanted to leave because this team was crap, then again, that falls on the architect of this team, Carl.

3) Like Lundberg said, franchise his a$$...

Param 10-06-2009 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 6145403)
We're several years away from building anything here. No reason to cry over these guys going somewhere else. That's just the way it is.

Seriously, wtf is this crap. Several years away? WTF? The Donkos are 4-0 with like 70% roster turnover. WTF why do we have to wait several years?

:mad:

gblowfish 10-06-2009 11:54 AM

Hey we haven't won jack since 1969. Saying we're several years away is pretty damn optimistic for a Chiefs fan. Let's see where Denver is after the year is over. A few years ago Miami got out to an undefeated start, then couldn't win a single game in November or December.

God, this whole board has its panties in a major wad today.

Lighten up, Francis!!

Param 10-06-2009 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 6145392)
Besides who gives a shit what he wanted. Franchise him until he signs a long term deal. We got rooked plain and simple.

Yep.

sedated 10-06-2009 11:56 AM

even if we are 3 years away from competing, which is a stretch in today's NFL, JA would be at the elderly age of 29. wow, glad we got rid of that geezer.

LaChapelle 10-06-2009 11:57 AM

Allen is insane enough to set out. The boy ain't right, it's also part of what makes him good. Running with the bulls, swimming with sharks, yea franchise my crazy ass.

Param 10-06-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6145426)
even if we are 3 years away from competing, which is a stretch in today's NFL, JA would be at the elderly age of 29. wow, glad we got rid of that geezer.

Seymour garners a 1st round pick. Peppers gets franchise up the wazoo at that old geezer age.

wild1 10-06-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Param (Post 6145412)
Seriously, wtf is this crap. Several years away? WTF? The Donkos are 4-0 with like 70% roster turnover. WTF why do we have to wait several years?

:mad:

Can we play the Browns or the Bengals or the Raiders, or have the Cowboys gift wrap a game for us every week, all the way to the Super Bowl?

Rain Man 10-06-2009 12:02 PM

We cannot let the memory of the Jared Allen trade die. We owe it to future generations of Chiefs fans to ensure that a horror like this never happens again. We need to show them the Number 69 tattooed on our forearms. We need to describe to them the feeling of having our most prized possession taken from us in the night. We need to describe to them the packed cattle cars of Chiefs fans on their way to Minnesota, the babies with Allen jerseys separated from their parents, families torn apart in a senseless orgy of franchise destruction. We need to describe to them the screams of the children, the terror on the faces of quarterbacks.

We cannot let this happen again. We are alive so this will never happen again.

CoMoChief 10-06-2009 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

No other choice? Jared Allen wanted to be in KC and get paid.....Carl then ****ed him over.....then Jared Allen wanted to get the **** outa Dodge which I don't blame him.

steelyeyed57 10-06-2009 12:08 PM

Faulty Logic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

Brandon Marshall didn't want to be in Denver. Chad Johnson (ocho cinco) demanded a trade out of Cinncinati.

Simply because a player uses this leverage tactic with the press, doesn't mean that a team has no choice but to move them. A savvy move would have been to find a way to get him signed.

However, this happened two years ago, under a different GM and different head coach. I agree that the milk's been spilt, let's move on.

CoMoChief 10-06-2009 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6145437)
Can we play the Browns or the Bengals or the Raiders, or have the Cowboys gift wrap a game for us every week, all the way to the Super Bowl?

The Raiders beat us. DAL will beat us. Cincy is playing good ball now, better than when they played DEN, so they'd beat us. CLE is a toss up. We're so ****ing bad I dont know who'd win that game to be completely honest.

B_Ambuehl 10-06-2009 12:27 PM

It amazes me how naivete some people are around here.

The Jared Allen deal was on Clark Hunt. If Clark wanted to pay him he woulda been paid.

Dane McLoud seems to be the only one around here who knows WTF is really going on.

As long as Clark **** is the tightass owner he is this team will fail to do anyting. Hell, as of last count they hadn't even hit the minimum payout for this years salary cap.

JOhn 10-06-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 6145457)
We cannot let the memory of the Jared Allen trade die. We owe it to future generations of Chiefs fans to ensure that a horror like this never happens again. We need to show them the Number 69 tattooed on our forearms. We need to describe to them the feeling of having our most prized possession taken from us in the night. We need to describe to them the packed cattle cars of Chiefs fans on their way to Minnesota, the babies with Allen jerseys separated from their parents, families torn apart in a senseless orgy of franchise destruction. We need to describe to them the screams of the children, the terror on the faces of quarterbacks.

We cannot let this happen again. We are alive so this will never happen again.

ROFL

:deevee:

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2009 01:04 PM

I don't blame Peterson for the trade. I blame Peterson for the shittiest drafting ever for a 10 yr period.

PunkinDrublic 10-06-2009 01:06 PM

He labled JA a troubled player but then backs up the brinks truck for LJ.
The BS double standard is what kills me. I'm glad we got Albert but players like JA are tough to come by.

Gravedigger 10-06-2009 01:07 PM

Forums are for opinions, your opinion that others shouldnt share their opinions because it conflicts with yours is pretty damn foolish. You're no different than the people who create posts complaining about the Jared Allen trade, in fact this post might be worse considering your complaining about those posts complaining.

So Why? Just Why, why, why.....

The Bad Guy 10-06-2009 01:08 PM

It's almost like bitching about the Glenn Dorsey pick. What other choice did Peterson have? If he didn't take Dorsey, he would have been shot to death leaving the Arrowhead parking lot that night.

wild1 10-06-2009 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6145696)
It's almost like bitching about the Glenn Dorsey pick. What other choice did Peterson have? If he didn't take Dorsey, he would have been shot to death leaving the Arrowhead parking lot that night.

I think Dorsey is getting better. He's benefiting from the new regime.

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2009 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6145696)
It's almost like bitching about the Glenn Dorsey pick. What other choice did Peterson have? If he didn't take Dorsey, he would have been shot to death leaving the Arrowhead parking lot that night.

I don't blame him for drafting Dorsey, either. His draft history is pretty shitty otherwise.

The Bad Guy 10-06-2009 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6145710)
I think Dorsey is getting better. He's benefiting from the new regime.

I agree with you. I think we have to get some real line coaches and a better coordinator before we see any signs of the players true abilities.

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2009 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6145731)
I agree with you. I think we have to get some real line coaches and a better coordinator before we see any signs of the players true abilities.

Yep. I hoping they only kept Krumrie because their options were limited since Haley was a late hire.

SDChiefs 10-06-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

He asked for a trade because he wanted a long term contract. One that CP would not give him. Therefore, it is, in fact Petersons fault. Had he signed him to a 6 year deal. Allen would still be here. We would never have drafted Jackson and we wouldn't have had the piss poor pass rush that we have for the last 2 years.

SDChiefs 10-06-2009 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6145386)
This.

Personally, I could give a shit.

I'm much more concerned with the issues at hand now, like the $60M QB that is averaging 150 ****ing yards a game.

3 games. 331 yards. 110 yards per game.

RedThat 10-06-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steelyeyed57 (Post 6145483)
Brandon Marshall didn't want to be in Denver. Chad Johnson (ocho cinco) demanded a trade out of Cinncinati.

Simply because a player uses this leverage tactic with the press, doesn't mean that a team has no choice but to move them. A savvy move would have been to find a way to get him signed.

However, this happened two years ago, under a different GM and different head coach. I agree that the milk's been spilt, let's move on.

Never looked at it that way. Good point.

RedThat 10-06-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl (Post 6145531)
It amazes me how naivete some people are around here.

The Jared Allen deal was on Clark Hunt. If Clark wanted to pay him he woulda been paid.

Dane McLoud seems to be the only one around here who knows WTF is really going on.

As long as Clark **** is the tightass owner he is this team will fail to do anyting. Hell, as of last count they hadn't even hit the minimum payout for this years salary cap.

I can agree with this. I stated before as long as he is the owner, this team will suck it up.

Micjones 10-06-2009 05:00 PM

Peterson always kept the wrong player.

We kept Johnson and let one of the best defensive ends in football hop a plane to Minnesota.
Just like before when we kept Eric Warfield and let Donnie Edwards defect for San Diego.

It hurts to see Allen tearing shit up in Minnesota.
Peterson had it out for the guy and didn't want him here.
He wanted Larry Johnson. We all know how well that worked out...

But then again, hindsight is always 20/20.

MichaelH 10-06-2009 05:09 PM

We wouldn't be 0-4 if he was still here. I'd bet somebodies left nut on it.

FloridaMan88 10-06-2009 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6145342)
Do people complain about the Jared Allen trade? Who cares.

Why do people say it's Peterson's fault? I can't understand the blame towards Peterson. He had no choice but to trade him.

Jared Allen didn't want to be here. Period. Can anyone blame him? Nope. This is sh*t franchise. He wanted to leave and Peterson had no other chocie but to trade him. It's as simple as that. And unfortunately he is a hard guy to replace. But Peterson got the best value he could get in return. It's the Chiefs fault for drafting sh*t. If you want something to complain about, look no further then the draft.

The problem with your analysis is that you ignore the reason Allen wanted out of KC... because of how Dictator Carl treated him like shit during the process leading up to negotiating a new contract.

FloridaMan88 10-06-2009 05:14 PM

The bottom line is the Chiefs have traded the likes of Tony Gonzalez and Jared Allen the past two offseasons and have essentially nothing (so far) to show for it. Jared Allen on the defensive line makes Dorsey a better player. Gonzalez makes Cassel a better player.

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2009 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6146432)
The bottom line is the Chiefs have traded the likes of Tony Gonzalez and Jared Allen the past two offseasons and have essentially nothing (so far) to show for it. Jared Allen on the defensive line makes Dorsey a better player. Gonzalez makes Cassel a better player.

Gonzales made Thigpen a better player. That got us 2 whole wins.

Marcellus 10-06-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6146432)
The bottom line is the Chiefs have traded the likes of Tony Gonzalez and Jared Allen the past two offseasons and have essentially nothing (so far) to show for it. Jared Allen on the defensive line makes Dorsey a better player. Gonzalez makes Cassel a better player.

I have to agree with that. And it sucks.

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2009 06:31 PM

I'll wait to pass judgment on Pioli on the Gonzales trade until I see what they do with that pick.

Marcellus 10-06-2009 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6146686)
I'll wait to pass judgment on Pioli on the Gonzales trade until I see what they do with that pick.

A good offensive lineman would be nice.

DJJasonp 10-06-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6146388)
Peterson always kept the wrong player.

We kept Johnson and let one of the best defensive ends in football hop a plane to Minnesota.
Just like before when we kept Eric Warfield and let Donnie Edwards defect for San Diego.

It hurts to see Allen tearing shit up in Minnesota.
Peterson had it out for the guy and didn't want him here.
He wanted Larry Johnson. We all know how well that worked out...

But then again, hindsight is always 20/20.

THIS! It was Carl's ego that kept LJ in KC....and shipped Allen to Minnesota. LJ was Carl's draft pick....and even though all of the historical stats about running backs coming off of a 400-plus carry season never being the same again were staring Carl in the face....he still sent a premiere pass rusher packing his bags....and handed a malcontent, diaper-wearing, 400-plus carry RB....a ton of dough.

Yeah...it had nothing to do with Carl! Right.

Marcellus 10-06-2009 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJJasonp (Post 6146729)
THIS! It was Carl's ego that kept LJ in KC....and shipped Allen to Minnesota. LJ was Carl's draft pick....and even though all of the historical stats about running backs coming off of a 400-plus carry season never being the same again were staring Carl in the face....he still sent a premiere pass rusher packing his bags....and handed a malcontent, diaper-wearing, 400-plus carry RB....a ton of dough.

Yeah...it had nothing to do with Carl! Right.

Because LJ was Carl's boy when he picked him over Vermiel's objections. He hitched his wagon to him right there and wasn't going to let him go regardless.

Talk about GM's with ego issues.

DTHOF 10-06-2009 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelH (Post 6146413)
We wouldn't be 0-4 if he was still here. I'd bet somebodies left nut on it.

But not your own?

Sully 10-06-2009 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6145362)
many people were defending the trade before and when it happened. if you WANTED him to be traded then you should be castrated. thats why people are still a little bitter

I wanted him traded.
I thought he was immature and would **** up again.
I thought he was going to be gone, it was just a decision of waiting for his contract to run out, or getting something in return.
...and...
I didn't think he was nearly as good as he is.

If I recall, his sack stats were very skewed toward the first halves. Not that it matters, now...but those were my thoughts at the time.

wildcat09 10-06-2009 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6146674)
Gonzales made Thigpen a better player. That got us 2 whole wins.


That looks like 2 more than we will win this year

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wildcat09 (Post 6147129)
That looks like 2 more than we will win this year

2-14 0-16 suck is suck

FAX 10-06-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6145376)
If the dumb **** didn't have a drinking problem, Carl probably would have paid the bitch. Its 50/50 on both parties in this case.

This post has a serious case of Yeppers.

FAX

wildcat09 10-06-2009 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6147200)
2-14 0-16 suck is suck


yeah.....your right......:(

I hate that we suck

teedubya 10-07-2009 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 6146915)
I wanted him traded.
I thought he was immature and would **** up again.
I thought he was going to be gone, it was just a decision of waiting for his contract to run out, or getting something in return.
...and...
I didn't think he was nearly as good as he is.

If I recall, his sack stats were very skewed toward the first halves. Not that it matters, now...but those were my thoughts at the time.

Oh, so it's Sully's fault. No wonder his fat ass doesn't want to come to St. Joe... to Joe's house... because we would all kick his non-Jared-Allen-wanting ass.

KCChiefsMan 10-07-2009 01:18 AM

ya, if Albert wasn't sucking then we probably wouldn't be complaining as much, but JA is one of the top defensive players in the entire NFL and letting him go sucks, it's hard to find players like him and because Carl refused to pay him, it does anger us.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.