ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Dallas Cowboys scouting report: Kansas City Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215761)

T-post Tom 10-07-2009 03:54 PM

Dallas Cowboys scouting report: Kansas City Chiefs
 
Dallas Cowboysscouting report: Kansas City Chiefs

01:40 AM CDT on Wednesday, October 7, 2009
By RICK GOSSELIN / The Dallas Morning News

Kansas City quarterback Matt Casseland running back Larry Johnson can't wear enough padding to protect them from the punishment they are taking each week.

The Chiefs are in the opening stages of a rebuilding program under new general manager Scott Pioli. He inherited a 2-14 team and tried to address the offensive and defensive lines during the off-season. He also acquired what he believes to be his quarterback of the future in Cassel.


But one area Pioli could not adequately address was wide receiver. Holdovers Dwayne Bowe and Mark Bradleyand veteran newcomers Bobby Engram and Bobby Wade share one common trait – a lack of game-breaking speed. They aren't going to run past anyone.

That allows defenses to single cover the two receivers on the flank and invest as many as nine players in run Defense and harassment of the quarterback.

So Johnson has nowhere to run and Cassel no time to throw. Cassel has already missed one game with an injury, and the Chiefs have allowed 13 sacks through four weeks.

Johnson brought a sterling 4.5-yard career average into the 2009 season. But he is averaging a paltry 2.6 yards in his 72 carries and is still looking for his first touchdown. This from a back who once scored 20 TDs in one season on his way to the 2005 AFC rushing crown.

The Chiefs are still searching for their first rushing touchdown of 2009. Baltimore's Willis McGahee has five touchdowns in 37 carries. The Chiefs have none in 109 carries. Kansas City's longest run is 24 yards by backup halfback Jamaal Charles.

When Cassel has time to throw, his receivers give him little after the catch. Bradley has a team-best 50-yarder, but he doesn't even start. Bowe's long is 29 yards, Wade's is 20 and Engram's is 18.

A lack of offensive plays has led to Kansas City's 0-4 start. The lack of offensive speed could make for another long afternoon Sunday against the Cowboys.

Reerun_KC 10-07-2009 03:57 PM

Well cant argue with that...

Mr. Flopnuts 10-07-2009 03:58 PM

Welcome to the laughing stock of the NFL.

FloridaMan88 10-07-2009 04:23 PM

This guy could have saved an hour and just wrote "see a flaming pile of dog shit" as the scouting report for the Chiefs.

Buehler445 10-07-2009 04:33 PM

Or he could have wrote epic suck and copied and pasted until he reached his word count.
Posted via Mobile Device

Pioli Zombie 10-07-2009 05:36 PM

This game could be worse than the Giant game due to team speed Dallas has on defense. I was watching bodies fly in Denver and kept thinking "Oh God, get the body bags"
Posted via Mobile Device

redfan 10-07-2009 05:55 PM

13 sacks already? Carp. I had no idea it was that many.:banghead:

milkman 10-07-2009 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redhed (Post 6149657)
13 sacks already? Carp. I had no idea it was that many.:banghead:

Aaron Rogers has been sacked 20 times this season already.

He's averaging 274 yards per game, and 8.6 YPA.

Matt Cassel, on the other hand, is averaging 153 yards per game and a sparkling 5.1 YPA.

Mr. Laz 10-07-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T-post Tom (Post 6149271)
He inherited a 2-14 team and tried to address the offensive and defensive lines during the off-season

He did?

milkman 10-07-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6149807)
He did?

Haven't you heard?

Mike Goff is the greatest free agent acquistion ever, and giving up a draft pick for two scrubs that he could have gotten for free is the work of pure genius.

philfree 10-07-2009 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6149816)
Haven't you heard?

Mike Goff is the greatest free agent acquistion ever, and giving up a draft pick for two scrubs that he could have gotten for free is the work of pure genius.

They addressed the o line by realizing McIntosh and Jones suck. They cut'em. LOL The writers when it comes to the 2009 Chiefs got nothing unless they just wanna say "suck!" It's like Pioli and Haley took charge of the Titanic 10 ft before it hit bottom. Of course it's their fault the it sank to start with.

The 2010 Chiefs? 'The Raising Of The Titanic'......Oh shit! I think we need more air bags!


PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 10-07-2009 07:54 PM

Aaron Rodgers has been under just about as much if not more pressure than Cassel yet he's made more plays...that should tell you something.

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6149850)
It's like Pioli and Haley took charge of the Titanic 10 ft before it hit bottom.

Come on.

The Executive of the Century hasn't done anything impressive since taking charge. Not one ****ing thing.

We were in bad shape. But it didn't have to be *this* bad.

philfree 10-07-2009 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149852)
Aaron Rodgers has been under just about as much if not more pressure than Cassel yet he's made more plays...that should tell you something.

Yeah you are right. It tells us that they have had the same offense for several years and the players on that team have a little clue about what's happening around them. Kinda like when Cassel won his starts last year.

PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 10-07-2009 07:58 PM

It tells me Rodgers makes plays...

I think he threw for more yards in a quarter the other night when he was getting hit and under constant pressure than Cassel has in the last 2 games combined.

58kcfan89 10-07-2009 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149852)
Aaron Rodgers has been under just about as much if not more pressure than Cassel yet he's made more plays...that should tell you something.

....
Greg Jennings vs. Bowe?
Donald Driver vs. Wade?
Jordy Nelson vs. Bobby Engram?
Donald Lee/Jermichael Finley vs. Sean Ryan?

I don't care how much pressure he's under, until Cassel gets more than 1 legit receiving threat, all it tells me is that Rodgers has 10 much better teammates than Cassel.

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58kcfan89 (Post 6149868)
....
Greg Jennings vs. Bowe?
Donald Driver vs. Wade?
Jordy Nelson vs. Bobby Engram?
Donald Lee/Jermichael Finley vs. Sean Ryan?

I don't care how much pressure he's under, until Cassel gets more than 1 legit receiving threat, all it tells me is that Rodgers has 10 much better teammates than Cassel.

We need that additional threat so that Cassel has someone else to throw behind.

philfree 10-07-2009 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6149857)
Come on.

The Executive of the Century hasn't done anything impressive since taking charge. Not one ****ing thing.

We were in bad shape. But it didn't have to be *this* bad.

Maybe it did if the direction of this franchise is going to be turned. I'm not happy about the suck but to truly change the Chiefs is gonna take a whole lotta of bad.

PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 10-07-2009 08:02 PM

It doesn't hurt that Rodgers has a much stronger arm and is more accurate, especially down the field.

Mecca 10-07-2009 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6149870)
We need that additional threat so that Cassel has someone else to throw behind.

I can't count the number of times Cassel has thrown a simple slant and been on the receivers back hip or shoulder, he did it to Bowe 3 times Sunday, then people wonder why he doesn't catch the ball.

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149876)
I can't count the number of times Cassel has thrown a simple slant and been on the receivers back hip or shoulder, he did it to Bowe 3 times Sunday, then people wonder why he doesn't catch the ball.

It's true that a lot of these throws have sucked, but, to be fair, Bowe should catch some of these balls, especially if he's a "#1".

Mecca 10-07-2009 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6149882)
It's true that a lot of these throws have sucked, but, to be fair, Bowe should catch some of these balls, especially if he's a "#1".

When a guy is coming over the middle short and he's about to get hit by 2 guys 1 of them being a LB and you're throw is making him reach back behind the odds of him catching it aren't good.

philfree 10-07-2009 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149864)
It tells me Rodgers makes plays...

I think he threw for more yards in a quarter the other night when he was getting hit and under constant pressure than Cassel has in the last 2 games combined.

So it's Rogers vs Cassel? What about the rest of the players? There is no comparison that's worth the time. It's just silly at this point.

PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 10-07-2009 08:12 PM

Considering Cassel was named the franchise I'm going to compare him to other QB's and the other night the Packers were in a very Chiefs like position with their line and he dramatically outperformed Cassel.

philfree 10-07-2009 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149894)
Considering Cassel was named the franchise I'm going to compare him to other QB's and the other night the Packers were in a very Chiefs like position with their line and he dramatically outperformed Cassel.

It's not just the o line it's the WRs, TEs and RBs too. I'm not gonna give Cassel a freebie but I find it hard to judge him harshly at this point. If he starts to have time and mis plays then he's fair game. If he blows the reads or just misses his recievers when he should make the play then he's fair game. But right now there isn't a real good comparison. The circumstances are way to diffferent. Period..

PhilFree:arrow:

P.S. He wasn't never namded the franchise.

FAX 10-07-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6149906)
It's not just the o line it's the WRs, TEs and RBs too. I'm not gonna give Cassel a freebie but I find it hard to judge him harshly at this point. If he starts to have time and mis plays then he's fair game. If he blows the reads or just misses his recievers when he should make the play then he's fair game. But right now there isn't a real good comparison. The circumstances are way to diffferent. Period..

PhilFree:arrow:

P.S. He wasn't never namded the franchise.

We've had the same problem for a few years. It's practically impossible to accurately evaluate a quarterback's play when they're working behind an o-line this bad. I guess you can give them points for surviving, but that's about it.

FAX

KcFanInGA 10-07-2009 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6149906)
It's not just the o line it's the WRs, TEs and RBs too. I'm not gonna give Cassel a freebie but I find it hard to judge him harshly at this point. If he starts to have time and mis plays then he's fair game. If he blows the reads or just misses his recievers when he should make the play then he's fair game. But right now there isn't a real good comparison. The circumstances are way to diffferent. Period..

PhilFree:arrow:

P.S. He wasn't never namded the franchise.

Agreed. I think people underestimate the fact that our offense is still new to our players. Give it time. There is something in the air around the Chiefs....and I don't mean the scent of our running game. I can't explain it with facts..but I feel we are on the road to good things. I just hope we don't drive past it.

boogblaster 10-07-2009 09:14 PM

We b shit .. but the stink is leaving slowly ...

Pioli Zombie 10-07-2009 09:47 PM

So what is this, Sanchez revealed himself to suck shit so now the constant comparison is Aaron Rodgers? Did Pioli have the opportunity to draft Rodgers?
Posted via Mobile Device

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6150129)
So what is this, Sanchez revealed himself to suck shit so now the constant comparison is Aaron Rodgers? Did Pioli have the opportunity to draft Rodgers?
Posted via Mobile Device

ROFL

Revealed himself. Too funny.

Mecca 10-07-2009 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6150149)
ROFL

Revealed himself. Too funny.

This forum needs to step up it's ban policy on some of these reeruns we've been exposed to.

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150168)
This forum needs to step up it's ban policy on some of these reeruns we've been exposed to.

Evidence A for why the Chiefs could never develop a n00b QB.

And my favorite rebuttal to this is: the same people who want to draft a QB wouldn't give Thigpen a chance!!!

As if some afterthought from Coastal Carolina is an apt comparison to an elite prospect.

Pioli Zombie 10-07-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6150149)
ROFL

Revealed himself. Too funny.

You're right. He was overated before Sunday. Sunday just confirmed it. But it is hilarious that it was always Cassel vs Sanchez until the Saints game and now its Aaron Rodgers.
Posted via Mobile Device

Saccopoo 10-07-2009 10:32 PM

In addition, the Giants and Eagles rank #1 and #2 in passing defense, while the Vikings and St.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149852)
Aaron Rodgers has been under just about as much if not more pressure than Cassel yet he's made more plays...that should tell you something.

That tells me that Rogers has been in that system and with his receivers a lot more than Cassel has. Familiarity with his receivers and knowledge of how they run their routes will lead to a higher degree of confidence in terms of getting them the ball.

It also tells me that GB is leaning more on Rogers because they, remarkably, have a worse running game than the Chiefs. (#22 versus the Chiefs at #18.)

It also tells me that the Packers have played against the following teams, which have their defensive rankings listed:

Minnesota: #1 sacks, #18 defense, #12 passing
Chicago: #3 sacks, #14 defense, #23 passing
Cincinnati: #4 sacks, #17 defense, #26 passing
St. Louis: #19 sacks, #19 defense, #19 passing

Whereas the Chiefs have played against:

Giants: #1 defense, #15 sacks, #1 passing
Philly: #3 defense, #9 sacks, #2 passing
Baltimore: #8 defense, #9 sacks, #23 passing
Oakland: #18 defense, #12 sacks, #11 passing

Basically, Cassel's numbers versus Rodgers numbers are pretty relevant considering the defenses that they've gone against.

Mecca 10-07-2009 10:35 PM

Lets not really factor in that Rodgers can make throws that Cassel can't.

milkman 10-07-2009 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6150217)
You're right. He was overated before Sunday. Sunday just confirmed it. But it is hilarious that it was always Cassel vs Sanchez until the Saints game and now its Aaron Rodgers.
Posted via Mobile Device

It's really amazing that you could be this much of a ****ing moron.

It really is.

Saccopoo 10-07-2009 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150289)
Lets not really factor in that Rodgers can make throws that Cassel can't.

Such as? Cassel has made a couple of real pretty touchdown passes this season that required a rather deft touch.

Sure, Rodgers has a cannon, but even Favre made his arm look like a limp noodle on Monday night by comparison.

I don't give a shit if Rodgers can throw bullets. Montana didn't have a cannon. Jim Kelly didn't have a cannon. Brady doesn't have a cannon. Fran Tarkenton didn't. Troy Aikman didn't either. However, Jamarcus Russell is purported to have a huge arm. Same with Jeff George. Kyle Boller as well. David Klingler.

It's not really a prerequisite in determining the overall success of a quarterback and team in this league.

philfree 10-07-2009 10:46 PM

Damn Pioli for not drafting Elway or Rogers! I can't believe he drafted Blacklege! The pain!!!!!!


PhilFree:arrow:

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6150217)
You're right. He was overated before Sunday. Sunday just confirmed it. But it is hilarious that it was always Cassel vs Sanchez until the Saints game and now its Aaron Rodgers.
Posted via Mobile Device

If you think game 4 confirmed anything about a n00b QB, I don't know what to tell you.

No matter how much you don't like it, Sanchez was/is an elite prospect.

And Rodgers' name has been thrown around on this forum for the last couple of years, as it became increasingly more clear that DJ was Scott Fujita.

Mecca 10-07-2009 10:53 PM

The absolutely obtuse arguments some people make are so far out there they deserve bitch slaps.

Saccopoo 10-07-2009 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6150336)
If you think game 4 confirmed anything about a n00b QB, I don't know what to tell you.

No matter how much you don't like it, Sanchez was/is an elite prospect.

And Rodgers' name has been thrown around on this forum for the last couple of years, as it became increasingly more clear that DJ was Scott Fujita.

The way Scott Fujita has been playing, I'd be really happy if DJ was Scott Fujita.

Saccopoo 10-07-2009 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150341)
The absolutely obtuse arguments some people make are so far out there they deserve bitch slaps.

You're a little edgy tonight...

carlos3652 10-07-2009 11:04 PM

Wait, isnt GB the team that had the OT on their PS that everyone went crazy for when we (and 32 other teams) didnt claim him... yet theur OT suck ass and gave up 20 sacks already? What am i missing...

DeezNutz 10-07-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6150364)
The way Scott Fujita has been playing, I'd be really happy if DJ was Scott Fujita.

That's no shit.

I just insulted Fujita.

Mecca 10-07-2009 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlos3652 (Post 6150382)
Wait, isnt GB the team that had the OT on their PS that everyone went crazy for when we (and 32 other teams) didnt claim him... yet theur OT suck ass and gave up 20 sacks already? What am i missing...

Buffalo signed him like 2 weeks ago making GB probably pretty upset he's gone.

carlos3652 10-07-2009 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150418)
Buffalo signed him like 2 weeks ago making GB probably pretty upset he's gone.

I just dont understand why they would even risk it considering they blow... GB that is, why try to leave that guy on the PS...he wasnt good enough to be one of their best 4 OT?

Mile High Mania 10-08-2009 04:49 AM

It's more than just the QBs... I think the Packers have a better defense than KC. I also think the Packers have a better set of WRs.

InChiefsHeaven 10-08-2009 06:36 AM

I guess the question is this...would Aaron Rodgers make those plays here in KC? Would Matt Cassel look as bad in Green Bay? He looked pretty damn good last year in New England...

notorious 10-08-2009 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149872)
It doesn't hurt that Rodgers has a much stronger arm and is more accurate, especially down the field.

So what you are saying is Rodgers is 10 times the quarterback that Cassell will ever be.......


B b b b buutt Cassell went 11-5! He was amazing last year!


Cassell was a waste. Period. People got pissed when I compared the move to our former GM's moves.

notorious 10-08-2009 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6150644)
It's more than just the QBs... I think the Packers have a better defense than KC. I also think the Packers have a better set of WRs.

You can say that for every position and every player from any team when comparing anything to the Chiefs.

JD10367 10-08-2009 08:02 AM

On ESPN, Schlereth just talked about the "Upset Alert" for this week, and he nominated the Titans against the Colts, and the Chiefs against the Cowboys.

JD10367 10-08-2009 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6150702)
You can say that for every position and every player from any team when comparing anything to the Chiefs.

No matter if Cassel or Croyle is starting... You have a good backup QB. :)

Otter 10-08-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6150341)
The absolutely obtuse arguments some people make are so far out there they deserve bitch slaps.

Let me break down yours:

I'm butt hurt that we didn't draft Sanchez and made up my mind about Cassell after 4 games with a shitty OL, new HC, GM, OC and no real receiving threat.

Send me your PayPal and I'll buy you a Mark Sanchez jersey so we can just get this over with already.

It's not your fault we didn't draft Sanchez Mecca. It's not your fault. It's not your fault. It's not your fault.

http://phoenix.fanster.com/blackjesu...your-fault.jpg

notorious 10-08-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 6150785)
No matter if Cassel or Croyle is starting... You have a good backup QB. :)

Damnit, I forgot Colquitt, too!

Chief Faithful 10-08-2009 11:28 AM

So has WR become the #1 need in the 2010 draft?

Saccopoo 10-08-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 6151338)
So has WR become the #1 need in the 2010 draft?

Based on the first quarter performances, I think that team need is something like this:

1. Center
2. Guard
3. Inside "Will" linebacker
4. Tight end
5. Safety
6. Left offensive tackle
7. Punt/Kick returner
8. Right offensive tackle
9. Inside "Mike" linebacker
10. Wide receiver
11. Outside "Jack" linebacker
12. Fullback
13. Outside "Sam" linebacker
14. Cornerback
15. Kicker
16. Punter
17. Quarterback

Pioli Zombie 10-08-2009 12:26 PM

Ok so its been decided. Pioli should have gone back in time and drafted Aaron Rodgers. Ok. I agree with that.
Posted via Mobile Device

Titty Meat 10-08-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6149852)
Aaron Rodgers has been under just about as much if not more pressure than Cassel yet he's made more plays...that should tell you something.

It says Rodgers has Jennings & Driver.

milkman 10-08-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6151498)
Ok so its been decided. Pioli should have gone back in time and drafted Aaron Rodgers. Ok. I agree with that.
Posted via Mobile Device

The comparison is being made, dumbass, because everyone defending Cassel is saying, well, he doesn't have any time, he can't make plays or do anything with no protection.

Well Aaron Rogers is making plays and putting up yards in spite of the fact that he isn't getting any more time than Cassel's sorry ass.

And I'm sorry your dumb ass is too ****ing stupid to understand that.

tonyetony 10-08-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6152170)
The comparison is being made, dumbass, because everyone defending Cassel is saying, well, he doesn't have any time, he can't make plays or do anything with no protection.

Well Aaron Rogers is making plays and putting up yards in spite of the fact that he isn't getting any more time than Cassel's sorry ass.

And I'm sorry your dumb ass is too ****ing stupid to understand that.

I've watched all the Packers games and to say Cassel is getting the same time in the pocket as Rodgers is complete and utter BS. I know that Rodgers is taking some sacks and that the Packers line sucks but our line sucks much much much worse than theirs. I would swap our line for theirs any day of the week.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.