ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Yet another Suh draft thread... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220272)

AustinChief 12-21-2009 02:51 AM

Yet another Suh draft thread...
 
OK, playing around with the numbers.... it looks like there is still a slight chance that we could get the #2 overall pick behind St Louis... I have to assume that they are going to go QB... which would leave Suh to us.

Now, that leaves a bit of a dilemna...

1) We obviously would have to move back to a 4-3... Suh is the kind of player you do whatvere it takes and fire whoever needs to be fired to best utilize him...

2) Our D-Line would then have the overall #3 from 2009, #5 from 2008, #2 from 2010 and #20 from 2006 picks on it...

That obviously is a hell of a lot of investment in just the d-line AND it also assumes that Tyson Jackson can play 4-3 DE AND it doesn't leave us with much pass rush from either DE... but I am willing to say that past/present coaching may have something to do with our past lack of pressure...


SOOO the question is... you just can't passs on Suh... but also how could we afford to get him at this point... are we past the point of no return?

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:02 AM

If Suh could play NT then yes.

Hammock Parties 12-21-2009 03:04 AM

They're not switching from the 3-4.

I'd just forget Suh at this point.

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:06 AM

If Suh is there you draft him and don't question going back to the 4-3...billy don't be a dumbass

philfree 12-21-2009 03:06 AM

Flame me baby.....Suh can transcend his position and that makes him fair game for the Chiefs. Everbody is still all stuck on drafting for need....don't let some other team have Suh..... Flame me...I can take the heat on this.

PhilFree:arrow:

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6366495)
They're not switching from the 3-4.

I'd just forget Suh at this point.

Is this your opinion or sources?

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366496)
If Suh is there you draft him and don't question going back to the 4-3...billy don't be a dumbass

Wha?

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6366498)
Flame me baby.....Suh can transcend his position and that makes him fair game for the Chiefs. Everbody is still all stuck on drafting for need....don't let some other team have Suh..... Flame me...I can take the heat on this.

PhilFree:arrow:

No need to flame, Suh is a monster

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:09 AM

The thing about Suh is he didn't do shit when Cosgrove and co. were the coaches. This staff is no better.

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6366500)
Wha?

could say the same thing about your first post in this thread....If suh is available when we're up you take him and go 4-3. Why convert him to a nt?

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366503)
could say the same thing about your first post in this thread....If suh is available when we're up you take him and go 4-3. Why convert him to a nt?

Egoli won't go 4-3 and he'd say some bullshit about the right 53. For ****s sake the Patriots had Troy Brown play CB. They are notorious for having guys play out of there natural position.

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6366502)
The thing about Suh is he didn't do shit when Cosgrove and co. were the coaches. This staff is no better.

forgive the guy when he was a sophmore playing under a lameduck coach

Hammock Parties 12-21-2009 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366499)
Is this your opinion or sources?

It's my opinion. But, come on. They're not switching from the 3-4.

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:17 AM

Good god, am I really arguing with another husker fan on wherther or not we take the best D player in the draft?

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366506)
forgive the guy when he was a sophmore playing under a lameduck coach

You know I love Suh but these are legit questions. Do you trust the current coaching staff will delevope him into a good player? I haven't seen proof of that. Who was the last can't miss D-tackle? He was also coached by a guy in college who knew what he was doing. The same guy who coached Suh :). To be honest the most intriguing Husker on defense is Phillip Dillard. I would like to see him on this linebacking core.

philfree 12-21-2009 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366503)
could say the same thing about your first post in this thread....If suh is available when we're up you take him and go 4-3. Why convert him to a nt?

He can play three downs at any position on the line and cause problems for the other team. He's not a classic NT but I think he can transcend all positions on the D line...


PhilFree:arrow:

SPchief 12-21-2009 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6366507)
It's my opinion. But, come on. They're not switching from the 3-4.

With everything going on you don't believe there is a chance with the switch in Coods and Suh being there that they won't switch?

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366509)
Good god, am I really arguing with another husker fan on wherther or not we take the best D player in the draft?

Suh projects in as a 5 tech in the 3-4, Sp. Pioli isn't going to change the defense for one player.

Hammock Parties 12-21-2009 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366512)
With everything going on you don't believe there is a chance with the switch in Coods and Suh being there that they won't switch?

They're gonna hire a 3-4 coach.

It's in Pioli and Haley's bloodlines.

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6366515)
They're gonna hire a 3-4 coach.

It's in Pioli and Haley's bloodlines.

Todd Bowles would be the best candidate.

SenselessChiefsFan 12-21-2009 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366499)
Is this your opinion or sources?

ROFL

SenselessChiefsFan 12-21-2009 06:56 AM

Suh is a beast. I think Dorsey is a better 4-3 players as well. I would love to see them do it.... don't think they will.

Plus, Tyson Jackson probably doesn't fit in a 4-3.

Fat Elvis 12-21-2009 08:42 AM

We are just so fooked on so many levels. We're about the only team in the NFL that can screw up the opportunity to draft Suh.

DeezNutz 12-21-2009 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6366515)
They're gonna hire a 3-4 coach.

It's in Pioli and Haley's bloodlines.

How many 3-4 golfers are there?

Chiefnj2 12-21-2009 08:49 AM

You don't build and design your entire team around a collegiate player you may not be able to draft.

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-21-2009 08:56 AM

Don't worry if we draft Suh and retain Pendergrass we'll be calling him "Duh" by the end of next year.

TheGuardian 12-21-2009 09:25 AM

We're not drafting Suh, we're not changing back to a 40 front. STFU and move on.

Saulbadguy 12-21-2009 09:46 AM

Suh's stock will drop sharply when he stops drinking from the roid river flowing through Lincoln.

Demonpenz 12-21-2009 09:59 AM

if suh is there make it work, he's the best player in the draft, and I don't care if we have drafted tyson jacons and dorsey, dlineman is still a need.

alanm 12-21-2009 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6366502)
The thing about Suh is he didn't do shit when Cosgrove and co. were the coaches. This staff is no better.

Not relevant since he missed one year due to injury and the other year he had seniors in front of him. Plus Cosgrove is in Minnesota for a reason. :spock:

Sam Hall 12-21-2009 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6366502)
The thing about Suh is he didn't do shit when Cosgrove and co. were the coaches. This staff is no better.

I have no recollection of those days.

alanm 12-21-2009 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6366510)
You know I love Suh but these are legit questions. Do you trust the current coaching staff will delevope him into a good player? I haven't seen proof of that. Who was the last can't miss D-tackle? He was also coached by a guy in college who knew what he was doing. The same guy who coached Suh :). To be honest the most intriguing Husker on defense is Phillip Dillard. I would like to see him on this linebacking core.

Dillard is 3rd or 4th rounder. He's also going to make the team that drafts him.

Red Dawg 12-21-2009 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6366509)
Good god, am I really arguing with another husker fan on wherther or not we take the best D player in the draft?

They will take the best player for this team. They have spent the entire year trying too teach these clowns the 3-4. They will not change the entire defense just because they picked Suh. Pats and Steelers have won 5 SB's between them recently with the 3-4. None of us should want it changed. Scott will get the players for the 3-4 and when he done it will be KICK ASS!

The Bad Guy 12-21-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6366769)
if suh is there make it work, he's the best player in the draft, and I don't care if we have drafted tyson jacons and dorsey, dlineman is still a need.

Thanks Matt Millen.

BigCatDaddy 12-21-2009 10:50 AM

Unless you are taking a QB, passing on Suh should be a fireable offense.

The Franchise 12-21-2009 10:53 AM

4 1st round picks on the defensive line would be monumentally stupid.

Demonpenz 12-21-2009 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6366872)
Thanks Matt Millen.

when did matt millen take a bunch of d-linemen?

Sam Hall 12-21-2009 11:13 AM

I'd like the Chiefs to come away from this draft with Eric Berry and Larry Asante, who had a breakout season.

Hoover 12-21-2009 11:16 AM

If we have Suh and Dorsey at DT, I think I could get 10.5 sacks...

BigCatDaddy 12-21-2009 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 6366930)
If we have Suh and Dorsey at DT, I think I could get 10.5 sacks...

McCoy isn't really that far behind Suh either. Him and Dorsey at DT's would also be sweet.

BossChief 12-21-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6366872)
Thanks Matt Millen.

I get what you are saying and all, but remember this: the Lions would have been more foolish to pass on Calvin Johnson just because of their history with first round receivers...THAT is the point.

I said it toward the beginning of the season, he is the best college player I have seen from any position during my lifetime except for Peyton. You CANT pass on a player like him if he is on the board when you are on the clock.

He will be Reggie White. His defense will win Championships. His presence would let our QB sleep better at night because of how much less will be on his shoulders. He would make Tamba a probowler.

WE JUST GAVE UP 286 YARDS RUSHING :cuss: AT HOME :cuss: TO A ****ING 3RD STRING RB :cuss: FROM A 2 WIN TEAM:cuss:! We NEED a SUH!

I also say it is foolish/misinformed to say that we would have to change to a 4-3 to draft him. We would have to tweak the scheme to a gap penetrating one where the nose is used similarly to how Dallas uses theirs to accommodate for Dorseys strengths. THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT DORSEY WAS DRAFTED FOR. He went so high because he could be in the a gap before the olinemen got set up. THATS WHAT HE WOULD BE DOING. This is why I have mentioned Wade Phillips so much in my thoughts about our possibilities for our DC position. His defense keyed by Dorsey and SUH would definitely be CHAMPIONSHIP calibur!

...SUH Dorsey Jackson
Hali... ___ ....___.... ___
Flowers Carr
Morgan...Page


Add a couple more linebackers and THAT defense is SET for some time to come and will consistently get better and grow together for the next 10 years..Fix the oline and receivers with the rest of FA/draft and we could be MUCH improved next year even with SUH going through rookie pains.

Suh could be the rare type of 3-4 end that can average 7-9 sacks per year and shut down the run to his side almost single-handedly.

As some are saying, he transcends the position.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6366878)
Unless you are taking a QB, passing on Suh should be a fireable offense.

THIS X100000000000000000000

Mr. Flopnuts 12-21-2009 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6366884)
4 1st round picks on the defensive line would be monumentally stupid.

It's hilarious to think this team could spend 4 top 5 picks on the d line over the course of a decade.

We'll be the new Detroit!

Fritz88 12-21-2009 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6366507)
It's my opinion. But, come on. They're not switching from the 3-4.

True. Why would they switch back to 4-3?

Fritz88 12-21-2009 12:21 PM

If we draft Suh I am going to shoot myself.

MahiMike 12-21-2009 12:38 PM

If Suh is there you have to take him and not look back.

Ebolapox 12-21-2009 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6366968)
I get what you are saying and all, but remember this: the Lions would have been more foolish to pass on Calvin Johnson just because of their history with first round receivers...THAT is the point.

I said it toward the beginning of the season, he is the best college player I have seen from any position during my lifetime except for Peyton. You CANT pass on a player like him if he is on the board when you are on the clock.

He will be Reggie White. His defense will win Championships. His presence would let our QB sleep better at night because of how much less will be on his shoulders. He would make Tamba a probowler.

WE JUST GAVE UP 286 YARDS RUSHING :cuss: AT HOME :cuss: TO A ****ING 3RD STRING RB :cuss: FROM A 2 WIN TEAM:cuss:! We NEED a SUH!

I also say it is foolish/misinformed to say that we would have to change to a 4-3 to draft him. We would have to tweak the scheme to a gap penetrating one where the nose is used similarly to how Dallas uses theirs to accommodate for Dorseys strengths. THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT DORSEY WAS DRAFTED FOR. He went so high because he could be in the a gap before the olinemen got set up. THATS WHAT HE WOULD BE DOING. This is why I have mentioned Wade Phillips so much in my thoughts about our possibilities for our DC position. His defense keyed by Dorsey and SUH would definitely be CHAMPIONSHIP calibur!

...SUH Dorsey Jackson
Hali... ___ ....___.... ___
Flowers Carr
Morgan...Page


Add a couple more linebackers and THAT defense is SET for some time to come and will consistently get better and grow together for the next 10 years..Fix the oline and receivers with the rest of FA/draft and we could be MUCH improved next year even with SUH going through rookie pains.

Suh could be the rare type of 3-4 end that can average 7-9 sacks per year and shut down the run to his side almost single-handedly.

As some are saying, he transcends the position.


THIS X100000000000000000000

dude, dorsey is NOT a nose tackle. that would completely neutralize his talents.

B_Ambuehl 12-21-2009 01:18 PM

Suh would do just fine at NT in this base D. Even then, in this league nowadays more than 50% of your snaps come in something other than a base package. He'd fit in perfect as an interior rusher in sub packages. Remember Sean Rogers didn't play nose tackle until he went to cleveland. Jay Ratliff never played nose tackle until Dallas, and he's a load smaller than Suh and nowhere near as powerful.

He'd be fine in this D.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-21-2009 01:24 PM

Dallas plays a different style of 3-4.

They are a penetrating, one gap 3-4.

NE guys run a two gap 3-4.

Suh would be great in a place like Dallas, but we'll use him like Vince Wilfork.

Titty Meat 12-21-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6366796)
Dillard is 3rd or 4th rounder. He's also going to make the team that drafts him.

Exactly he'll be a great ILB in the 3-4. We better draft him.

RedThat 12-21-2009 04:13 PM

If Suh is there, and the Chiefs don't draft him, I wouldn't be disappointed.

The draft doesn't assure any guarantees imo. Im happy with 3-4 scheme, I just don't think they have the personnel to run it. Although I do think there are plenty of players available in this draft that could help run a 3-4 defense effectively. so its not the end of the world if the Chiefs don't draft Suh. Just gotta find the right guys that could help run your defense. Its here and might as well stick with it rather then changing schemes again.

They went from 4-3 to 3-4 and I dont want to see them go back to 4-3. Let the players learn this scheme rather then change and learn and have to adjust to another scheme. Finding the right guys for a 3-4 and having our current personnel adapt to this scheme is what Id rather see. And that only happens if they stick and carry out their plan.

TheGuardian 12-21-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6367355)
Dallas plays a different style of 3-4.

They are a penetrating, one gap 3-4.

NE guys run a two gap 3-4.

Suh would be great in a place like Dallas, but we'll use him like Vince Wilfork.

This is all true. Very nice. Technically speaking Dallas is more of a gap and a half style but I'll give it to you anyway. ;)

Sanka 12-21-2009 05:47 PM

Cool, lets draft 3 DT's in the first round in a row. This is almost similar to the Lions drafting WR in all those drafts.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 05:50 PM

if i ever have a son im gonna name him: bill or bob ANYTHING but suh.

Sam Hall 12-21-2009 05:52 PM

I've resigned myself to the fact that our 3-4 scheme makes drafting Suh unlikely. I'm on board with Eric Berry or Rolando McClain.

AustinChief 12-21-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6367355)
Dallas plays a different style of 3-4.

They are a penetrating, one gap 3-4.

NE guys run a two gap 3-4.

Suh would be great in a place like Dallas, but we'll use him like Vince Wilfork.

didn't consider that... Suh, Dorsey, Jackson in a Dallas style 3-4 would work pretty well.. hell of alot invested in the d-line though

..and of course, we don't have the staff to coach the players we have anyway, so it's a moot point.

BossChief 12-21-2009 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6366968)
I also say it is foolish/misinformed to say that we would have to change to a 4-3 to draft him. We would have to tweak the scheme to a gap penetrating one where the nose is used similarly to how Dallas uses theirs to accommodate for Dorseys strengths. THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT DORSEY WAS DRAFTED FOR. He went so high because he could be in the a gap before the olinemen got set up. THATS WHAT HE WOULD BE DOING. This is why I have mentioned Wade Phillips so much in my thoughts about our possibilities for our DC position. His defense keyed by Dorsey and SUH would definitely be CHAMPIONSHIP calibur!

...SUH Dorsey Jackson
Hali... ___ ....___.... ___
Flowers Carr
Morgan...Page

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6367355)
Dallas plays a different style of 3-4.

They are a penetrating, one gap 3-4.

NE guys run a two gap 3-4.

Suh would be great in a place like Dallas, but we'll use him like Vince Wilfork.

too bad it doesnt have a chance huh...

ChiefsCountry 12-21-2009 08:24 PM

Wait till we draft Terrence Cody.

Direckshun 12-21-2009 10:44 PM

It'd be an intriguing experiment.

Talk about force-revamping your defense.

lostcause 12-21-2009 11:01 PM

I would pray for this scenario to unfold. If Suh is available at our draft position, some team will be willing to trade up to get him from us.

notorious 12-21-2009 11:04 PM

If only Pioli and Haley would have took the advise from CP and stuck with the 4-3........


Suh and Dorsey playing next to each other inside is the stuff that dreams are made of. **** **** ****


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.