ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Will Pioli make a move for Brandon Marshall? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220870)

Titty Meat 01-01-2010 04:02 PM

Will Pioli make a move for Brandon Marshall?
 
I say no the golfer couldn't handle him.



Discuss.

RustShack 01-01-2010 04:03 PM

Cassel for Marshall and draft Clauson. To the ship!

Mecca 01-01-2010 04:03 PM

We don't want a piece of shit like that on our team. /CP

Titty Meat 01-01-2010 04:03 PM

Marshall, Bowe, Spiller = Cassel pro bowl.

Old Dog 01-01-2010 04:04 PM

I doubt it, but I would LOVE to see him in a Chiefs uniform.

LaChapelle 01-01-2010 04:04 PM

He has to be controlled
Haley and Marshall=nothing but trouble

Bane 01-01-2010 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaChapelle (Post 6396696)
He has to be controlled
Haley and Marshall=nothing but trouble

This.He can't stand being coached by a lil girl,WTF is gonna do when Haley calls him a stupid fugg? Exactly.......

Red Brooklyn 01-01-2010 04:10 PM

His attitude worries me a little bit. You know it that - Randy Moss at Oakland, give up when things aren't going way - sense. And of course the Haley/Marshall battles would be epic. But he's a great player. I don't think I'd mind if Pioli gave it a shot.

Titty Meat 01-01-2010 04:11 PM

I say sign him and it Haley & him get into it with his big contract it would likely be Haley that gets fired. It's a win/win.

LaChapelle 01-01-2010 04:12 PM

Shanahan will pay well for him probably

Willie Lanier 01-01-2010 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6396690)
Cassel for Marshall and draft Clauson. To the ship!

sad thing is we could have executed that deal and added a pick to the asking price before the draft last year with ease

BossChief 01-01-2010 04:15 PM

If Josh McD was to be willing to trade us Marshall, I wouldn't want him.

chiefs1111 01-01-2010 04:16 PM

Id love too have Marshall but I doubt Denver would deal him within the division

Mecca 01-01-2010 04:17 PM

Denver will probably never actually deal him.

the Talking Can 01-01-2010 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6396692)
Marshall, Bowe, Spiller = Cassel pro bowl.


seriosuly, we could do many worse things....instant offense

Titty Meat 01-01-2010 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6396732)
Denver will probably never actually deal him.

I don't think a team would deal a good pick for him.

Mecca 01-01-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6396740)
I don't think a team would deal a good pick for him.

And this is where NFL teams lose me, Brandon Marshall is a far better player than any WR in this years draft, 1 of which will probably go in the top 10. If Dez Bryant became close to what Marshall is his team would piss themselves in joy.

Old Dog 01-01-2010 04:23 PM

Damnit, deleted, I meant to edit.

Isn't he a free agent after this year? I don't recall him signing an extension.

Mr_Tomahawk 01-01-2010 04:26 PM

How soon can teams begin signing FA? I am not very familiar with how soon we can start releasing players/coaches and sign new ones...

After Sunday can we start shopping for a new OC and DC?


As for Marshall...meh...it won't hurt my feelings if we dont go after him.

Thig Lyfe 01-01-2010 04:29 PM

Valuing attitude over talent is what ****ed over this team all decade long.

chiefs1111 01-01-2010 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 6396753)
Damnit, deleted, I meant to edit.

Isn't he a free agent after this year? I don't recall him signing an extension.

If there is no new agreement reached for the CBA then I believe he would be one of the players who would have to wait an extra year for FA. Though I honestly don't know for sure

Icon 01-01-2010 04:30 PM

Marshall doesn't strike me as "Right 53" material Pioli is so fond of. We need more players like Matt Cassell, Mike Vrable, Toothless Tyson Jackson, Donald Washington, Mike Brown, etc.

Mecca 01-01-2010 04:31 PM

We don't value talent we value attitude, so we won't be in a superbowl for 40 more years.

I do enjoy the people who act like the players are their buddies so they must all be great people.

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 04:34 PM

Isn't Marshall being benched right now?

I don't care for guys like Marshall. You can count on him to be a problem at some point in the season. He's the next TO.

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6396777)
We don't value talent we value attitude, so we won't be in a superbowl for 40 more years.

I do enjoy the people who act like the players are their buddies so they must all be great people.

You can also have players that divide locker rooms and cause problems on the field too. Or players that have offseason problems that transfer over to the field. Marshall is one of those guys.

And I enjoy fans who think that if a guy has talent he's worth taking a chance on no matter what kind of baggage he brings.

mlyonsd 01-01-2010 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6396780)
Isn't Marshall being benched right now?

I don't care for guys like Marshall. You can count on him to be a problem at some point in the season. He's the next TO.

Haley would just take him under his wing and whisper encouragment to him.

BossChief 01-01-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6396783)
You can also have players that divide locker rooms and cause problems on the field too. Or players that have offseason problems that transfer over to the field. Marshall is one of those guys.

And I enjoy fans who think that if a guy has talent he's worth taking a chance on no matter what kind of baggage he brings.

beat me to it.

Mecca 01-01-2010 04:40 PM

The Cowboys won 3 superbowls with a team full of douchebags, I really could careless about that kind of stuff. Talent wins they were proof of that.

007 01-01-2010 04:42 PM

nah, the ball dropping disease will only infect him as well.

Pioli Zombie 01-01-2010 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6396690)
Cassel for Marshall and draft Clauson. To the ship!

That's actually not reeruned.
Posted via Mobile Device

stevieray 01-01-2010 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportsRacer (Post 6396774)
Valuing attitude over talent is what ****ed over this team all decade long.

..valuing talent over attitude is what has ****ed the NFL in the last decade.

Toad 01-01-2010 04:55 PM

Talent often times cannot overcome conflict.

Mecca 01-01-2010 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6396829)
..valuing talent over attitude is what has ****ed the NFL in the last decade.

Yes turning billions in profit and being the #1 sport in the country has surely ****ed them.

Quesadilla Joe 01-01-2010 05:02 PM

Marshall wouldn't go to a small market team.

LaChapelle 01-01-2010 05:09 PM

Marshall is only a problem when you're losing
wanting Marshall in KC=massive homer to me

DeezNutz 01-01-2010 05:11 PM

Haley could coach him up.

Mecca 01-01-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6396875)
Haley could coach him up.

I think I'd pay to see him punch Haley.

Thig Lyfe 01-01-2010 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6396829)
..valuing talent over attitude is what has ****ed the NFL in the last decade.

lol

MahiMike 01-01-2010 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6396691)
We don't want a piece of shit like that on our team. /CP

This. We're better off without him.

Mecca 01-01-2010 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6396914)
This. We're better off without him.

You just agreed with a sarcastic post...I swear you must be one of those guys I hear on 810.

Old Dog 01-01-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6396914)
This. We're better off without him.


<a href="http://s1023.photobucket.com/albums/af354/old_dog69/?action=view&current=lolbuilder.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1023.photobucket.com/albums/af354/old_dog69/lolbuilder.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Mecca 01-01-2010 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 6396946)
<a href="http://s1023.photobucket.com/albums/af354/old_dog69/?action=view&current=lolbuilder.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1023.photobucket.com/albums/af354/old_dog69/lolbuilder.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

You should see his other posts today.

Touchdown Bowe 01-01-2010 05:33 PM

Last I checked, Marshall never played for the Pats or Cards..so no he'll never be a Chief

Dead&Buried 01-01-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6396780)
Isn't Marshall being benched right now?

I don't care for guys like Marshall. You can count on him to be a problem at some point in the season. He's the next TO.

He is injured, strained hamstring or something. He is a beast on the field. With him and Bowe on the outside and draft a real fast small guy to play slot KC would be explosive, well, if they had a QB that is?

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:05 PM

Anyone who says no needs their ****ing head checked.

I do not want CJ Spiller either. This offense with Charles, Bowe and Marshall would be very, very good.

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead&Buried (Post 6397013)
He is injured, strained hamstring or something. He is a beast on the field. With him and Bowe on the outside and draft a real fast small guy to play slot KC would be explosive, well, if they had a QB that is?

You're not following the news then. He's also been benched for disciplinary reasons.

DeezNutz 01-01-2010 06:08 PM

But what about the negative effect this would have on Cassel? Two WRs who are among the league leaders in drops?

I think we need to be careful here.

Upgrade the talent. We don't need more scrubs like Bowe.

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6396790)
The Cowboys won 3 superbowls with a team full of douchebags, I really could careless about that kind of stuff. Talent wins they were proof of that.

Using something as an exception doesn't make it override the rule. End of story. Most teams have a guy or two that is a problem, but some guys are head cases.

And the Pats were a dynasty with guys that weren't trouble makers and the Steelers aren't a team full of trouble makers. Generally the teams that win a lot don't have locker room cancers.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397056)
Anyone who says no needs their ****ing head checked.

I do not want CJ Spiller either. This offense with Charles, Bowe and Marshall would be very, very good.

I love the "if anyone disagrees with me you're stupid" posts.:bong:

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6396887)
I think I'd pay to see him punch Haley.

Now you're getting ****ing stupid with your Haley hate.

HotRoute 01-01-2010 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6396692)
Marshall, Bowe, Spiller = Cassel pro bowl.

Charles?

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397056)
Anyone who says no needs their ****ing head checked.

I do not want CJ Spiller either. This offense with Charles, Bowe and Marshall would be very, very good.

Yeah until Marshall does something stupid then isn't playing. Then the offense is what?

that's what you don't invest big money in guys with habitual maturity issues.

Sweet Dick Willy 01-01-2010 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6397061)
But what about the negative effect this would have on Cassel? Two WRs who are among the league leaders in drops?

I think we need to be careful here.

Upgrade the talent. We don't need more scrubs like Bowe.


Sweet Dick say, "make receivers and tight ends roll in a tub of the crazy glue before every game".

That do it.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6397067)
Yeah until Marshall does something stupid then isn't playing. Then the offense is what?

that's what you don't invest big money in guys with habitual maturity issues.

Yawn.

Yeah, ignore his immense talent because he got into a spat with his coach over playing with a bad hamstring.

If the Chiefs have a shot at Marshall and don't take it I'll take that as a true sign that Pioli has no clue.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397064)
I love the "if anyone disagrees with me you're stupid" posts.:bong:

If you don't think the Chiefs should go after a guy who can catch 100 passes with just about any QB in the NFL, then yes, you are ****ing reeruned.

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397076)
Yawn.

Yeah, ignore his immense talent because he got into a spat with his coach over playing with a bad hamstring.

If the Chiefs have a shot at Marshall and don't take it I'll take that as a true sign that Pioli has no clue.

You don't think it's a big deal that he won't play or practice with an owie? I do.

TO had immense talent too.

Lots of teams aren't going to take a shot at Marshall that have a clue. What's funny is how you think you have all the answers. Go get an NFL job smart guy. :rolleyes:

Bane 01-01-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397078)
If you don't think the Chiefs should go after a guy who can catch 100 passes with just about any QB in the NFL, then yes, you are ****ing reeruned.

Oh they can go after Marshall if they like.i think he'd be a great addition,but you say just adding him make our O "very very good".ROFL
Yeah never mind Cassel make stupid throws,or our OL only gives him 1.2 seconds to make those stupid decisions.Our TE's suck.Yeah just add Marshall and welcome to the SB!!:spock:

DeezNutz 01-01-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6397082)
Go get an NFL job smart guy. :rolleyes:

Should we quote this back to you when you repeatedly tell other posters to "learn more about football"?

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6397082)
You don't think it's a big deal that he won't play or practice with an owie? I do.

TO had immense talent too.

Lots of teams aren't going to take a shot at Marshall that have a clue. What's funny is how you think you have all the answers. Go get an NFL job smart guy. :rolleyes:

Teams win games by getting players with talent. This team is has the least amount of talent in the NFL. Yeah, an owie. Let's make a pulled hamstring seem like a busted fingernail.

Kindly go **** yourself. Your opinions on here have led me to believe you are one step ahead of KCJohnny on the football spectrum.

TheGuardian 01-01-2010 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397089)
Teams win games by getting players with talent. This team is has the least amount of talent in the NFL. Yeah, an owie. Let's make a pulled hamstring seem like a busted fingernail.

Kindly go **** yourself. Your opinions on here have led me to believe you are one step ahead of KCJohnny on the football spectrum.

And you're the dumb bitch of a mother ****er talking about throwing millions at a guy who won't practice with the same injury other players on his own team have.

So stick that in your dumbass pipe and smoke it reerun.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397087)
Oh they can go after Marshall if they like.i think he'd be a great addition,but you say just adding him make our O "very very good".ROFL

I think Brandon Marshall is an exceptional talent. I think Jamaal Charles has helped our running attack incredibly. I think having a top 8 receiver in the NFL would do nothing but make this offense very very good. Cassel can perform with really good receivers, he's shown that.

I'm sorry you disagree.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397078)
If you don't think the Chiefs should go after a guy who can catch 100 passes with just about any QB in the NFL, then yes, you are ****ing reeruned.

In other words if I don't agree with you,I am reeruned.ROFL

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6397090)
And you're the dumb bitch of a mother ****er talking about throwing millions at a guy who won't practice with the same injury other players on his own team have.

So stick that in your dumbass pipe and smoke it reerun.

Who else on the team have hamstring issues?

Again, **** yourself.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397095)
In other words if I don't agree with you,I am reeruned.ROFL

If you want to paint yourself with that brush, be my guest.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397093)
I think Brandon Marshall is an exceptional talent. I think Jamaal Charles has helped our running attack incredibly. I think having a top 8 receiver in the NFL would do nothing but make this offense very very good. Cassel can perform with really good receivers, he's shown that.

I'm sorry you disagree.

I don't disagree that Marshall is a top tier WR,but just adding him does not make Cassel a pro bowl QB.

DaFace 01-01-2010 06:25 PM

He's just an RFA this year, so chances are we'd have to pay out the ass to get him. My guess is that Pioli wouldn't go for it.

That said, off-the-field issues aside, he's a hell of a player - that's for sure.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397078)
If you don't think the Chiefs should go after a guy who can catch 100 passes with just about any QB in the NFL, then yes, you are ****ing reeruned.

Here ya go.No brush at all.Agree with you,or be reeruned.Plain and simple.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397100)
I don't disagree that Marshall is a top tier WR,but just adding him does not make Cassel a pro bowl QB.

He doesn't have to be a Pro Bowl QB for this offense to be very good. I think depending on someone like Charles and having someone like Marshall to open up the entire field would do wonders.

Receivers are the key to any successful offense. There's only one likely playoff team that doesn't have stud receivers.

Moss, Wayne, Vincent Jackson, Desean, Greg Jennings, Miles Austin, Larry Fitz, Syd Rice, Boldin, Ocho.

You need someone defenses fear. Dwayne Bowe isn't that guy.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397105)
Here ya go.No brush at all.Agree with you,or be reeruned.Plain and simple.

I'm glad we've established that.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397111)
He doesn't have to be a Pro Bowl QB for this offense to be very good. I think depending on someone like Charles and having someone like Marshall to open up the entire field would do wonders.

Receivers are the key to any successful offense. There's only one likely playoff team that doesn't have stud receivers.

Moss, Wayne, Vincent Jackson, Desean, Greg Jennings, Miles Austin, Larry Fitz, Syd Rice, Boldin, Ocho.

You need someone defenses fear. Dwayne Bowe isn't that guy.

WR's huh? Who were the "key" WR's during Vermeil's tenure here?

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397117)
WR's huh? Who were the "key" WR's during Vermeils' tenure here?

Is this 2005?

Offenses are more pass orientated than ever. The NFL has changed a whole hell of a lot in 4 years.

Brock 01-01-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397117)
WR's huh? Who were the "key" WR's during Vermeil's tenure here?

Yeah, maybe if they'd had one they'd have won a playoff game.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397113)
I'm glad we've established that.

You know if you really believe you are so goddamned smart and we are all beneath you,and reeruned,maybe you should get a job as a NFL HC or something.I'm sure as smart as you are,teams will be lined up,camping out on your door step for your services.

DeezNutz 01-01-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397117)
WR's huh? Who were the "key" WR's during Vermeil's tenure here?

His name was Gonzo.

Old Dog 01-01-2010 06:32 PM

This thread is getting dumber by the minute......how about we put a link to this one in the "epic Fail" thread?

Bane 01-01-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6397128)
Yeah, maybe if they'd had one they'd have won a playoff game.

Playoff game BULLSHIT again.Absolutely has nothing to do with what we are talking about.Don't worry,the Chiefs will probably lose tomorrow and you can smile and be happy and trash them all day long like you want to.

DaFace 01-01-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 6397138)
This thread is getting dumber by the minute......how about we put a link to this one in the "epic Fail" thread?

No kidding. The idea that we wouldn't want a young, more-talented-than Bowe WR...well...it makes baby Jesus cry.

Bane 01-01-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6397127)
Is this 2005?

Offenses are more pass orientated than ever. The NFL has changed a whole hell of a lot in 4 years.

Right.ok.Thanks ManGenius.

Brock 01-01-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397141)
Playoff game BULLSHIT again.Absolutely has nothing to do with what we are talking about.Don't worry,the Chiefs will probably lose tomorrow and you can smile and be happy and trash them all day long like you want to.

What do you mean it has nothing to do with what you're talking about? You brought up Vermeil's offense like it meant something. If you don't want to hear people talk about this shitty team like what it is, a shitty team, maybe you should go look for some homer board where it isn't allowed.

The Bad Guy 01-01-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6397134)
You know if you really believe you are so goddamned smart and we are all beneath you,and reeruned,maybe you should get a job as a NFL HC or something.I'm sure as smart as you are,teams will be lined up,camping out on your door step for your services.

Maybe you and your brother The Guardian can come up with a new line of thought. This is the new flavor of the message board. "If you're so smart, go get an NFL job."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.