ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Sources: Cavaliers close to deal for Stoudemire (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=223412)

blazzin311 02-14-2010 09:14 AM

Sources: Cavaliers close to deal for Stoudemire
 
Found this, this morning for those interested. I'd have to think that if the Cavs got Stoudemire it for sure makes them the favorites to win the Eastern Conference.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4913305

Updated: February 14, 2010, 2:57 AM ET
Sources: Hickson, Ilgauskas to Suns

By Chris Broussard
ESPN The Magaazine
Archive
The Cleveland Cavaliers and Phoenix Suns are closing in on a deal that would send All-Star forward Amare Stoudemire to Cleveland, according to sources with knowledge of the negotiations.

Stoudemire

The Cavaliers would send Zydrunas Ilgauskas and J.J. Hickson to Phoenix in exchange for Stoudemire, one of the league's most dominant big man.

While Cleveland remains in talks with several other teams, the club, from management down to the players, has settled on Stoudemire as its first choice.

The ball is in Phoenix's court. The Suns are mulling whether the financial relief provided by Ilgauskas's $12 million contract and the young and talented Hickson are enough for them to part with Stoudemire.

Cleveland believes the addition of Stoudemire would all but seal LeBron James' re-signing with the team when he becomes a free agent this summer. The Cavaliers are also prepared to sign Stoudemire, who has one year and $17 million remaining on his contract, to a long-term contract extension once the season ends.

The Suns will likely waive Ilgauskas, which would allow him to be re-signed by Cleveland after 30 days.

Cleveland is also talking with Washington about acquiring Antawn Jamison, as well as Indiana about Troy Murphy. Meanwhile, Golden State is trying to entice the Cavs into taking Corey Maggette for Ilgauskas.

Psyko Tek 02-14-2010 09:37 AM

good luck with the no defense I don't rebound look my name has a apostrophe or 3little bitch

never liked him on the court
without nash feeding him
he's gonna suck

The Bad Guy 02-14-2010 09:43 AM

For me, this is a far more lopsided trade than the Gasol one for the Lakers. Z is going to get bought out and head back to Cleveland. Hickson doesn't even have close to the potential to ever fill Amar'e's shoes.

YayMike 02-14-2010 09:57 AM

Wow, Phoenix would be stupid to do this...

BigMeatballDave 02-14-2010 10:01 AM

Surely the Suns cannot be this stupid.

If this happens, the Cavs NOT winning an NBA Championship would be colossal fail.

chiefzilla1501 02-14-2010 10:02 AM

I think it's interesting that they think this would seal the deal for Lebron getting a new contract. I was thinking just the opposite. Lebron's going to get an astronomically huge contract. Can they really afford him AND Stoudemire in the long-term?

Sure-Oz 02-14-2010 10:14 AM

This is like the jermaine dye for neifi perez deal

Miles 02-14-2010 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YayMike (Post 6530919)
Wow, Phoenix would be stupid to do this...

Mostly just really cheap. It wouldn't surprised me if this does happen and the Suns buy out the Ilgauskas contract like they did with everyone they received for Shaq. Net result would essentially be Shaq and Amare for JJ Hickson.

Miles 02-14-2010 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6530910)
For me, this is a far more lopsided trade than the Gasol one for the Lakers. Z is going to get bought out and head back to Cleveland. Hickson doesn't even have close to the potential to ever fill Amar'e's shoes.

The Grizz at least got the rights to Marc Gasol who is turning into a pretty solid player so that trade doesn't look nearly as bad now as it did at the time it was made.

The Suns really should get more attention for the terrible moves they have made over the past 5 years which appear to have been mostly of the money saving variety. They have a lot more in common with the Clipppers than they get credit for.

the Talking Can 02-14-2010 10:40 AM

this would essentially be giving stoudemire away for nothing...not even a high draft pick


it might be worse than the gasol trade

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 10:42 AM

Stoudemire isn't that good. He's not a very good shooter and he plays horrendous defense. Horrendous.

One of the Cavs best strengths, half court defense, would immediately become a liability.

IMO, this could be the rare trade that makes both teams worse.

Sarver has consistently shown that he cares more about the bottom line than titles, otherwise the Suns of the last 6 years probably would have won 4 titles.

KevB 02-14-2010 11:03 AM

Good comments by miles and hamas. The Pau Gasol trade looks a lot better now, with Marc becoming a top shelf center and money freeing up space to eventually add Randolph. Too bad the Grizz didn't take Tyreke instead of Thabust.

RealSNR 02-14-2010 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6530956)
Stoudemire isn't that good. He's not a very good shooter and he plays horrendous defense. Horrendous.

One of the Cavs best strengths, half court defense, would immediately become a liability.

IMO, this could be the rare trade that makes both teams worse.

Sarver has consistently shown that he cares more about the bottom line than titles, otherwise the Suns of the last 6 years probably would have won 4 titles.

Isn't that what everybody said when Shaq was dealt to Cleveland? That it won't help Cleveland's inability to defend the pick and roll/teams like Orlando will only continue to have their way with them, etc.

eazyb81 02-14-2010 11:09 AM

I would LOVE it if this convinces LeBron to resign with the Cavs. I can't stand all the NY and NJ media and fans all but penciling him in to their lineups for the next 10 years.

Quesadilla Joe 02-14-2010 11:19 AM

I have always thought that Amare Stoudemire would be the PERFECT compliment with LeBron. Amare can shoot off the pick and roll and actually finish at the basket something LeBron has been missing from his bigs.

Ilgauskas is more of a pick and pop big guy and Verajo is extremely limited offensively. There is no way in hell the Cavs don't win the Finals if they get Amare.

Saul Good 02-14-2010 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 6530987)
Isn't that what everybody said when Shaq was dealt to Cleveland? That it won't help Cleveland's inability to defend the pick and roll/teams like Orlando will only continue to have their way with them, etc.

Boy do those guys look stupid after Cleveland rolled Orlando in the playoffs last year.

Quesadilla Joe 02-14-2010 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6530956)
Stoudemire isn't that good. He's not a very good shooter and he plays horrendous defense. Horrendous.

One of the Cavs best strengths, half court defense, would immediately become a liability.

IMO, this could be the rare trade that makes both teams worse.

Sarver has consistently shown that he cares more about the bottom line than titles, otherwise the Suns of the last 6 years probably would have won 4 titles.

Stoudemire has all the potential in the world and is a very good shooter for a guy his size. Before his micro-fracture surgery he absolutely killed Tim Duncan in the playoffs, he averaged like 35 points and 15 rebounds in a series against he Spurs one year.

RealSNR 02-14-2010 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6531007)
Boy do those guys look stupid after Cleveland rolled Orlando in the playoffs last year.

Shaq was still with the Suns last season.

I know it's only a regular season game, but Shaq is much better against Dwight Howard than Z was. I think that was a good deal.

DJ's left nut 02-14-2010 11:46 AM

The Cavs would be smarter to send Shaq in this deal.

Shaq and Amare on the floor with LeBron would completely clog the middle. At that point, you've done a fair amount to defeat LeBron's greatest strength; his strength/inside presence.

LeBron's an average shooter. He needs some room to work from inside and/or mid-range to really excel. If you have Shaq and Amare down there, the entire defense will collapse down and his lanes are gone.

I actually think Danny Granger would be a perfect fit for Cleveland if they could figure out a way to get him. He's a bigger guy that can rebound a little but works on the perimeter offensively.

Titty Meat 02-14-2010 11:57 AM

Hickson is one of the most underrated players in the NBA. Amare is good but I don't see how this stretchs the court to open things up for Lebron. Jamison would be the ideal player for the Cavs.

chiefzilla1501 02-14-2010 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6531057)
Hickson is one of the most underrated players in the NBA. Amare is good but I don't see how this stretchs the court to open things up for Lebron. Jamison would be the ideal player for the Cavs.

I agree. I'm not really seeing it. What I really think the Cavs need, actually, is a John Paxson or Steve Kerr type player. A guy who simply does not miss an open long-range shot. A guy who Lebron can drive in and then kick the ball out to the outside to a wide open man and he'll drain it every time. Stoudemire could be that guy. But I feel like it should be a pure outside sharpshooter instead. It just seems like all their best kickback shooters are bigger guys with good range on their jumpshots. Z was actually one of those guys.

Moe Williams was supposed to be that guy, but he absolutely choked in the playoffs last year.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6531014)
Stoudemire has all the potential in the world and is a very good shooter for a guy his size. Before his micro-fracture surgery he absolutely killed Tim Duncan in the playoffs, he averaged like 35 points and 15 rebounds in a series against he Spurs one year.

Operative phrase: before his microfracture surgery.

He's never been the same player since. His explosiveness is gone.

Combine that with putting him and Shaq in the same front court, and you have a defensive apocalypse.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 12:09 PM

Washington wasn't doing a straight salary dump. They got good value for Butler, all things considered.

Where the Cavs really ****ed themselves was last year, when they could have offloaded Szczerbiak's expiring contract for a piece, but did nothing.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6531071)
I agree. I'm not really seeing it. What I really think the Cavs need, actually, is a John Paxson or Steve Kerr type player. A guy who simply does not miss an open long-range shot. A guy who Lebron can drive in and then kick the ball out to the outside to a wide open man and he'll drain it every time. Stoudemire could be that guy. But I feel like it should be a pure outside sharpshooter instead. It just seems like all their best kickback shooters are bigger guys with good range on their jumpshots. Z was actually one of those guys.

Moe Williams was supposed to be that guy, but he absolutely choked in the playoffs last year.

Cleveland has 3 guys in the top 15 in the league in 3 pt %. I don't think that's really a problem.

The one thing they still don't have is a second player who can create his own shot. You can't have LeBron going 1-5 in crunch time and win consistently.

DJ's left nut 02-14-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6531071)
I agree. I'm not really seeing it. What I really think the Cavs need, actually, is a John Paxson or Steve Kerr type player. A guy who simply does not miss an open long-range shot. A guy who Lebron can drive in and then kick the ball out to the outside to a wide open man and he'll drain it every time. Stoudemire could be that guy. But I feel like it should be a pure outside sharpshooter instead. It just seems like all their best kickback shooters are bigger guys with good range on their jumpshots. Z was actually one of those guys.

Moe Williams was supposed to be that guy, but he absolutely choked in the playoffs last year.

What the Cavs have is 3 of the top 11 3-pt shooters in the game already. They have guards that can shoot the three-pointer. A Kerr/Paxson doesn't do them nearly as well as a guy like Trevor Ariza would, but Ariza plays SF.

They need a power forward that can shoot from outside; a Glenn Rice type.

Granger would be their best bet, followed closely by Antwan Jamison (in fact, Jamison might be even better), but even someone like Troy Murphy or Matt Bonner would be good as well

Psyko Tek 02-14-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6530956)
Stoudemire isn't that good. He's not a very good shooter and he plays horrendous defense. Horrendous.

One of the Cavs best strengths, half court defense, would immediately become a liability.

IMO, this could be the rare trade that makes both teams worse.

Sarver has consistently shown that he cares more about the bottom line than titles, otherwise the Suns of the last 6 years probably would have won 4 titles.

yeah sarver is a bottom line guy
gawd I miss, colangelo

the refs didn't help phx at all

DJ's left nut 02-14-2010 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531097)
Cleveland has 3 guys in the top 15 in the league in 3 pt %. I don't think that's really a problem.

The one thing they still don't have is a second player who can create his own shot. You can't have LeBron going 1-5 in crunch time and win consistently.

Mo Williams can create off the dribble, as can Gibson.

The Cavs don't run an offense that really encourages those guys to make their own shot. LeBron dominates the ball in their offense.

If you put Jamison out there with Williams and Parker, the defense would have to spread to cover the wings and LeBron could have his way inside. Another 'creator' would just end up doing what Parker's doing now; shooting jumpers after LeBron crashes.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 12:17 PM

As strange as it seems, the Cavs probably would have been better off last year and the foreseeable future had they offered a 1 and Szczerbiak's contract for Zach ****ing Randolph off all people.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6531105)
Mo Williams can create off the dribble, as can Gibson.

The Cavs don't run an offense that really encourages those guys to make their own shot. LeBron dominates the ball in their offense.

If you put Jamison out there with Williams and Parker, the defense would have to spread to cover the wings and LeBron could have his way inside. Another 'creator' would just end up doing what Parker's doing now; shooting jumpers after LeBron crashes.

Mo Williams scores 9.9 points a game that aren't from beyond the arc.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 12:21 PM

DJ, what I mean by "create his own shot" is someone who can score without needing someone else to dribble, drive, and kick it to them for an open look.

They can either

1) Beat their man off the dribble

or

2) Beat the guy in post

The Cavs don't have anyone who can score in the low post if you get him the ball on the block, aside from the corpse of Shaq.

They can't play Hi-Lo

Titty Meat 02-14-2010 12:28 PM

This trade may make sense if the plan is to dump Shaq after this year and use Amare to get Lebron to stay (which I think he will).

-King- 02-14-2010 12:54 PM

For the past few years it's been "LeBron doesn't have any talent around him! He cant win"

The next few years after Amare is there its going to be "LeBron isn't getting the ball as much with Amare there and the Cavs can't win with LeBron not getting that many touches."


Amare just plain out sucks on defense and that will weaken the Cavs top 5 defense. Atleast with Z and Shaq, finesse centers around the league had trouble scoring in the post, but with Amare there, centers will have no trouble scoring.

chiefzilla1501 02-14-2010 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531121)
DJ, what I mean by "create his own shot" is someone who can score without needing someone else to dribble, drive, and kick it to them for an open look.

They can either

1) Beat their man off the dribble

or

2) Beat the guy in post

The Cavs don't have anyone who can score in the low post if you get him the ball on the block, aside from the corpse of Shaq.

They can't play Hi-Lo

I think you're right on this. Varejao can do it, but pretty inconsistently and he has a pretty limited range of shots.

DJ's left nut 02-14-2010 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531121)
DJ, what I mean by "create his own shot" is someone who can score without needing someone else to dribble, drive, and kick it to them for an open look.

They can either

1) Beat their man off the dribble

or

2) Beat the guy in post

The Cavs don't have anyone who can score in the low post if you get him the ball on the block, aside from the corpse of Shaq.

They can't play Hi-Lo

As to the first point, what Williams does vs. what he can do are two separate animals. Williams can create off the dribble, but his offense doesn't encourage it.

As to the second - who is LeBron going to play hi-lo with?

That's not his game, never will be. Hi-lo serves to crash the defense in low where he wants to operate. He is the lo, with Williams, etc... being the high. So getting another big for LeBron to play hi-lo with isn't going to work.

Do you mean the Cavs should be looking for an alternative to LeBron? Another inside presence to play hi-lo with Williams/Gibson/Parker? If so, I guess I see what you're saying. When he's not hitting, it'd be nice to have a 2nd option.

But if I had a guy like James on my squad, I'd recognize that the odds of him going cold for an entire playoff series are pretty slim. As such, I'd work on finding a way to maximize him, rather than try to find a fallback to him.

Jamison or Granger are the best ways to maximize your best weapon. If LeBron ices up for a series, the Cavs are boned no matter who they add. So go with the guys that will make your team play its best when it's at full throttle. That's how you win a title and that's how you keep LeBron in Cleveland.

chiefzilla1501 02-14-2010 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531097)
Cleveland has 3 guys in the top 15 in the league in 3 pt %. I don't think that's really a problem.

The one thing they still don't have is a second player who can create his own shot. You can't have LeBron going 1-5 in crunch time and win consistently.

I do agree with this. For the kickout guys, we'll see. I didn't see anyone step up against the Magic. Jordan had Paxson and Kerr. When you needed a big shot, they'd hit it.

We'll definitely see. Gibson's been pretty red hot of late, but I've always viewed him as a streak shooter until recently. Mo Williams definitely isn't that guy, when it comes to the playoffs. And Parker might step it up, but I just haven't been overly impressed with him so far.

But I think you're right that they have some guys who could fill that role. I do agree that they need a guy who can set up some shots.

RealSNR 02-14-2010 01:04 PM

Maybe the Cavs can steal Brandon Jennings from the Bucks. Just like how they stole Moe Williams.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6531276)
As to the first point, what Williams does vs. what he can do are two separate animals. Williams can create off the dribble, but his offense doesn't encourage it.

As to the second - who is LeBron going to play hi-lo with?

That's not his game, never will be. Hi-lo serves to crash the defense in low where he wants to operate. He is the lo, with Williams, etc... being the high. So getting another big for LeBron to play hi-lo with isn't going to work.

Do you mean the Cavs should be looking for an alternative to LeBron? Another inside presence to play hi-lo with Williams/Gibson/Parker? If so, I guess I see what you're saying. When he's not hitting, it'd be nice to have a 2nd option.

But if I had a guy like James on my squad, I'd recognize that the odds of him going cold for an entire playoff series are pretty slim. As such, I'd work on finding a way to maximize him, rather than try to find a fallback to him.

Jamison or Granger are the best ways to maximize your best weapon. If LeBron ices up for a series, the Cavs are boned no matter who they add. So go with the guys that will make your team play its best when it's at full throttle. That's how you win a title and that's how you keep LeBron in Cleveland.

It's not that LeBron will go cold for seven games. But he will go cold for a game, or for a quarter, or a half, and when that happens, they have absolutely no one who can pick up the slack.

The best kind of guy for that team would have been a guy like Randolph, who can crash the boards, get points w/o having plays run for him while LeBron is in, and if you want to give LBJ a blow, you can run plays for him in the low post.

Cleveland has an alpha dog an energy guy (Varejao) and role players. But they don't have a second banana who can emulate a first when needed (McHale, Pippen, early Kobe, Shaq in Miami, even Ginobili to a lesser extent)

CoMoChief 02-14-2010 01:16 PM

Amare Stoudemire - #1 player in the state of FL coming out of HS in 2002

Who was the #2????

MU's Kevin Young.

ROFL To say that's a huge gap in talent is an understatement.

Quesadilla Joe 02-14-2010 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531080)
Operative phrase: before his microfracture surgery.

He's never been the same player since. His explosiveness is gone.

Combine that with putting him and Shaq in the same front court, and you have a defensive apocalypse.

Ilgauskas isn't the best post defender in the world either and Cleveland was doing fine defensively. Really Verajo is the only good defending big the Cavs have.

Amare is still one of if not the most athletic big guy in the NBA. Cleveland has excellent perimeter defenders and they will make Amare's job a lot easier.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6531367)
Ilgauskas isn't the best post defender in the world either and Cleveland was doing fine defensively. Really Verajo is the only good defending big the Cavs have.

Amare is still one of if not the most athletic big guy in the NBA. Cleveland has excellent perimeter defenders and they will make Amare's job a lot easier.

Cleveland is a tremendous regular season team, but I think that their inadequacies will manifest themselves in the playoffs far beyond what they appear to be now.

Quesadilla Joe 02-14-2010 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531318)
The best kind of guy for that team would have been a guy like Randolph, who can crash the boards, get points w/o having plays run for him while LeBron is in, and if you want to give LBJ a blow, you can run plays for him in the low post.

Are you talking about Zach Randolph who plays for the Grizzlies or Anthony Randolph?

Zach Randolph is one of the biggest ball hogs in the NBA. If he gets the ball he is going to shoot it no matter what. NBA people were calling him the black hole when he was in New York because once the ball goes inside to him it doesn't come back out.

Quesadilla Joe 02-14-2010 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531384)
Cleveland is a tremendous regular season team, but I think that their inadequacies will manifest themselves in the playoffs far beyond what they appear to be now.

Maybe so. The Cavs haven't had a lot of talent the past 3 or 4 years but if they get a guy like Stoudemire they are going to be very tough to beat.

They will be able to get a lot of opposing Centers and PF's into foul trouble with LeBron, Shaq, and Amare.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-14-2010 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6531385)
Are you talking about Zach Randolph who plays for the Grizzlies or Anthony Randolph?

Zach Randolph is one of the biggest ball hogs in the NBA. If he gets the ball he is going to shoot it no matter what. NBA people were calling him the black hole when he was in New York because once the ball goes inside to him it doesn't come back out.

He's actually matured quite a bit. He's a good player, and would work as a second guy who knew his role. Again, he's a physical rebounder who gets a lot of points on putbacks, and he can score from the low block.

The only other guy who would be a better fit for that Cavs team (realistically), IMO, would be a guy like Stephen Jackson (who is both a great and awful teammate).

BIG_DADDY 02-14-2010 01:41 PM

GO LAKERS!!!! That is all.

Psyko Tek 02-14-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6531419)

They will be able to get a lot of opposing Centers and PF's into foul trouble with LeBron, Shaq, and Amare.

A'm'a'r'e' os constantly in foul trouble

I just want the suns to get a1st or 2nd and 3rd for him
and then it's bye-bye

no d
no boards
can't create

hell I'ld rather play Looooouuu Admunsen and lopez

-King- 02-14-2010 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6531466)
GO LAKERS!!!! That is all.

This.

Saul Good 02-14-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 6531536)
A'm'a'r'e' os constantly in foul trouble

I just want the suns to get a1st or 2nd and 3rd for him
and then it's bye-bye

no d
no boards
can't create

hell I'ld rather play Looooouuu Admunsen and lopez

If I were the Cavs, I'd offer them a 3rd. I know it's off topic, but who do you think the Chiefs should draft in the 8th round this year?

Basileus777 02-14-2010 02:53 PM

http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/9416/bslslight.png

The great JJ Hickson.

Salary dump trades are ruining the NBA. This would be one of the most lopsided trades in NBA history. I don't know how anyone could think that trading a garbage man like Hickson for one of the best pick and roll bigs in the league wouldn't make the Cavs a better team. Amare has a nice mid-range shot and would be nasty playing with LeBron. Seriously, LeBron is making JJ Hickson look decent by feeding him easy baskets.

If the Suns trade for Ilgauskas and waive him (which they probably will), that essentially means they traded the Cavaliers JJ Hickson for Shaq and Amare.

KevB 02-14-2010 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531460)
He's actually matured quite a bit. He's a good player, and would work as a second guy who knew his role. Again, he's a physical rebounder who gets a lot of points on putbacks, and he can score from the low block.

Shockingly, this is all true. Randolph has been a model teammate for the Griz this year, and that's with a team full of impressionable youngsters. I think if you put him with a LBJ, he'd know his role and act accordingly. He was a black hole for the Knicks and Clips, but look at the garbage he was playing with. He probably should have been the guy taking the most shots.

RealSNR 02-14-2010 03:17 PM

cavs shud sing greg osterrtag

Quesadilla Joe 02-14-2010 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6531460)
He's actually matured quite a bit. He's a good player, and would work as a second guy who knew his role. Again, he's a physical rebounder who gets a lot of points on putbacks, and he can score from the low block.

The only other guy who would be a better fit for that Cavs team (realistically), IMO, would be a guy like Stephen Jackson (who is both a great and awful teammate).

I knew Randolph was having probably his best season of his career, but I haven't caught one Grizzlies game all season. I just figured he was putting up numbers by being selfish. Guess he has wised up a bit.

Stephen Jackson is very versatile good player. He would be a good fit on any team IMO. He is a little bit of a thug though.

Basileus777 02-14-2010 04:04 PM

Randolph is also a poor defender, and he's a much less efficient scorer than Amare. You're talking about a full .100 difference in TS%. And he can't be a partner in the pick and roll with LeBron like Amare can. The Cavs don't have a need for the rebounding that Randolph would bring either. Z-Bo would be a better fit for a team like Boston that can't rebound and has no post scoring.

RealSNR 02-18-2010 12:41 AM

Much better outcome than Stoudemire for the Cavs.

http://www.nba.com/2010/news/02/17/w...s=iref:nbahpt2

Cavaliers get Jamison from Wizards in 3-team trade

Posted Feb 17 2010 7:53PM - Updated Feb 18 2010 12:49AM
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Cleveland Cavaliers acquired Antawn Jamison on Wednesday night, the forward they hope will fit in between LeBron James and Shaquille O'Neal on a championship front line.



Jamison goes to Cleveland from the Washington Wizards in a three-team trade that sent Drew Gooden to the Los Angeles Clippers.
Washington received Cavaliers center Zydrunas Ilgauskas, a 2010 first-round draft pick and the rights to Emir Preldzic, who was selected in the second round of last year's draft from Cleveland.
The Wizards also received forward Al Thornton from Los Angeles.
Cleveland gets guard Sebastian Telfair from the Clippers.
"Antawn is a great pro. We are very excited to have an experienced all-star player of Antawn's caliber and character join us," Cavaliers general manager Danny Ferry said in a statement announcing the trade. "He has the ability to add a special, unique dimension to our team with a strong inside presence and the ability to stretch teams defensively, while impacting the entire court. We think he matches the culture we have built, and continue to build, and will fit well with our group on the court and off."
The Cavaliers had long coveted an athletic power forward who could play on the perimeter after they were eliminated by the Orlando Magic in last year's Eastern Conference finals.
They had reportedly been involved in trade talks with Phoenix for Amare Stoudemire, but instead ended up with another former All-Star.
Jamison, who had been with the Wizards since 2004, is averaging 20.5 points this season. He was not in uniform for Washington's game with Minnesota on Wednesday.
"Antawn Jamison has been the embodiment of leadership on and off the court for this franchise for five-and-a-half seasons and we thank him for all he has done for the Wizards and the city of Washington," Wizards president Ernie Grunfeld said. "Unfortunately, our on-court results have not met our expectations and we felt it was necessary to make changes to improve our future and our financial flexibility. This trade accomplished both of those objectives."
Jamison left the arena shortly before the game. As he entered his car, he said to reporters: "Not now."
He did have a message for Wizards fans. "You know I love them more than they love me."
Jamison should immediately step in at power forward for Cleveland and supply James with another legitimate scoring option as the Cavaliers' seek their first championship. Jamison is still owed $28 million over the next two seasons.
Cleveland (43-11) already has the best record in the NBA and can set a new franchise mark by winning its 14th straight game Thursday night against Denver. Still, the Cavaliers couldn't pass on the opportunity to add a proven veteran like Jamison, who can stretch opposing defenses with his perimeter shooting and open up the lane for James and O'Neal.
Ilgauskas, who is 34, has played his entire 12-year NBA career with the Cavaliers. He was supplanted as the starter center by O'Neal this season. He's averaging 7.5 points and 5.3 rebounds this season. His career averages are 13.9 points and 7.7 rebounds.
"Z has been a cornerstone part of this franchise and his jersey will hang in the rafters here some day, not only because of his play, but because of the tremendous person he is and what he has meant to the franchise and the community," Ferry said. "He has represented the Cavaliers, Cleveland and the NBA at a consistently high level for many years. We wish Z and his family the best."
Ilgauskas' agent, Herb Rudoy, told the (Cleveland) Plain Dealer that he would work quickly to get a buyout from Washington. That would free up Ilgauskas to sign with another team -- including re-signing with the Cavaliers, although he'd have to wait 30 days to return to Cleveland.
"I've already heard from a few teams -- good teams -- that are really interested in wanting to talk about Z going to play for them," Rudoy told the paper.
James can become a free agent this summer, leaving this as Cleveland's final shot at a championship before he decides to stay or go. The Cavaliers also had the league's best record last season, when they failed to reach the NBA finals.
Maybe Jamison can help them take that next step.
He was extremely popular not only with fans in Washington, but also with his teammates and the late owner Abe Pollin. After Gilbert Arenas was suspended indefinitely early last month, Jamison was the one who was chosen to speak to the crowd before the Jan. 8 game. He apologized for a skit that pantomimed shooting guns, calling it: "very embarrassing."
Now Jamison is gone and Wizards coach Flip Saunders lauded him.
"He's one of the most professional guys I've ever been around," Saunders said.
The Wizards acquired Gooden on Saturday in a multiplayer trade that sent Caron Butler, Brendan Haywood and DeShawn Stevenson to the Dallas Mavericks.
Gooden was reportedly seeking a buyout. Unlike his three former Mavericks teammates, he did not practice with the Wizards on Tuesday, but was at shootaround Wednesday morning. He was listed as inactive.
"Basically, we started looking at opportunities to clear cap space for this summer and in the meantime acquire assets that we also liked," Clippers general manager Mike Dunleavy said. "In the last two days, we were able to do that. And it gives us the flexibility to pretty much go in a lot of different directions."
Jamison was an All-Star in both 2005 and 2008, and averaged 20.5 points in 41 games. He missed the first nine games of this season with a sprained right shoulder.
The 33-year-old played his first five seasons with Golden State and after playing the 2003-04 season with Dallas, was traded to Washington. Jamison has a career average of 19.9 points.
The 6-foot-7 Thornton has averaged 13.7 in his three-year career with the Clippers.
Telfair, who's 24, will be playing for his fourth team. The former first-round pick has averaged 7.9 points in his career.

Titty Meat 02-18-2010 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6531057)
Hickson is one of the most underrated players in the NBA. Amare is good but I don't see how this stretchs the court to open things up for Lebron. Jamison would be the ideal player for the Cavs.

This.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2010 04:37 AM

I didn't think the Wizards would be willing to deal Jamison for basically nothing.

That's a phenomenal trade for Cleveland.

It allows them to go small with Varejao, Jamison, Lebron, West, and Williams, and if they want to go big they can do the following:

Ilgauskus/Shaq
Varejao
Jamison
Lebron
Williams/West

Plus, it gives you a crunch time lineup that allows you to take Varejao and Shaq off the court, who are either poor offensive players (Varejao) or defensive liabilities and poor FT shooters (Shaq).

Far better than dealing for Stoudemire, as you want to win right now, he's not a horrible defensive player, and his numbers weren't ridiculously elevated by Steve Nash.

Plus, he's not a soft bitch when it comes to rebounding.

DaKCMan AP 02-18-2010 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6541246)
I didn't think the Wizards would be willing to deal Jamison for basically nothing.

That's a phenomenal trade for Cleveland.

It allows them to go small with Varejao, Jamison, Lebron, West, and Williams, and if they want to go big they can do the following:

Ilgauskus/Shaq

Varejao
Jamison
Lebron
Williams/West

Plus, it gives you a crunch time lineup that allows you to take Varejao and Shaq off the court, who are either poor offensive players (Varejao) or defensive liabilities and poor FT shooters (Shaq).

Far better than dealing for Stoudemire, as you want to win right now, he's not a horrible defensive player, and his numbers weren't ridiculously elevated by Steve Nash.

Plus, he's not a soft bitch when it comes to rebounding.

You realize they traded Ilgauskus?

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2010 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6541261)
You realize they traded Ilgauskus?

You realize he's gonna get bought out and end up back in Cleveland in 30 days?

Miles 02-18-2010 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6541261)
You realize they traded Ilgauskus?

I think the general assumption but many is that his contract will be bought out and he returns to the Cavs.

If the Cavs win the championship this year it will mark the third consecutive year that the team that won it all were heavily aided by poor/poorly run teams trying to save money.

DaKCMan AP 02-18-2010 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6541267)
You realize he's gonna get bought out and end up back in Cleveland in 30 days?

From what I've heard, Dallas wants him real bad and has already been in contact.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2010 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6541270)
From what I've heard, Dallas wants him real bad and has already been in contact.

Dallas can't offer him any more than Cleveland can, and Cleveland is a significantly better team.

Miles 02-18-2010 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6541271)
Dallas can't offer him any more than Cleveland can, and Cleveland is a significantly better team.

Dallas probably can't offer him any more of a role either since they acquired Heywood. Z would probably get more, if not the same, time spelling Shaq than he would in the Haywood/Dampier mix.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2010 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6541274)
Dallas probably can't offer him any more of a role either since they acquired Heywood. Z would probably get more, if not the same, time spelling Shaq than he would in the Haywood/Dampier mix.

Not to mention that Cleveland is a stone cold #1 seed and Dallas could go anywhere from #3-#7 based upon losing 2 games in the standings.

Miles 02-18-2010 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6541276)
Not to mention that Cleveland is a stone cold #1 seed and Dallas could go anywhere from #3-#7 based upon losing 2 games in the standings.

Agreed. The West is a shitfest of capable teams outside LA and maybe Denver.

Could be an interesting trade deadline if Amare goes to Miami. Also looking like the Rockets got Kevin Martin but at a somewhat stiff price of Landry.

eazyb81 02-18-2010 08:03 AM

Is T-Mac going to the Knicks?

Miles 02-18-2010 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 6541324)
Is T-Mac going to the Knicks?

Sounds possible. They really want him for cap space.

Basileus777 02-18-2010 12:04 PM

Good deal, but Jamison is a horrible defensive player, probably even worse than Amare on that side of the floor. That's going to be the biggest problem integrating him, he isn't capable of guarding any decent Sf or PF, which will be a problem against someone like LA. Teams have been gameplanning against his weaknesses on defense for years in Washington.

It's not surprising how little Washington got for him. Jamison's age and bad contract killed any value he had.

Chiefs Pantalones 02-18-2010 12:38 PM

lol once again, Cleveland fails to make it sexy for LeBron to stay in Cleveland. Their only hope was to acquire Stoudemire. It sucks, but the Lakers will win it again.

GO BULLS!!!

ChiefsCountry 02-18-2010 12:48 PM

Getting Landry was a nice pickup for the Kings. K Marts days were numbered in Sactown.
Posted via Mobile Device

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2010 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 6542038)
Good deal, but Jamison is a horrible defensive player, probably even worse than Amare on that side of the floor. That's going to be the biggest problem integrating him, he isn't capable of guarding any decent Sf or PF, which will be a problem against someone like LA. Teams have been gameplanning against his weaknesses on defense for years in Washington.

It's not surprising how little Washington got for him. Jamison's age and bad contract killed any value he had.

He's not a good defensive player, but he's a much more capable rebounder in the flow of the game than Stoudemire. Furthermore, given that you can play him at 3, it allows you far more flexibility than Amare, and he makes them a better defensive matchup against Orlando, since Lewis has been extremely hesitant to drive this year, and Vince Carter treats contact like it's Semtex.

Furthermore, Amare just had a really good offensive game, scored 30. But he grabbed a paltry 8 rebounds and gave up 31-7 to Donte mother****ing Greene.

That's an abortion.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-18-2010 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6542188)
Getting Landry was a nice pickup for the Kings. K Marts days were numbered in Sactown.
Posted via Mobile Device

New York got ****ing raped.

Houston offloads T-Mac, gets back the best player in the deal (Martin), gets two lottery picks (IMO) in 2011, 2012, and gets Jordan Hill, who could at least be a quality second line PF on a good team.

A+ for Morey.

Kings did OK. Landry is a really good player, Hughes will expire, and they have almost no money committed to anyone next year.

Basileus777 02-18-2010 12:58 PM

The Knicks on July 1st will have 4 players under contract: Curry, Douglas, Gallinari and Chandler.

New York or not, I don't see why any Superstar would want to play with that garbage. And if they don't get Wade/Lebron, they just gave Houston two high lotto picks and Jordan Hill for nothing.

Chiefs Pantalones 02-18-2010 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6542197)
He's not a good defensive player, but he's a much more capable rebounder in the flow of the game than Stoudemire. Furthermore, given that you can play him at 3, it allows you far more flexibility than Amare, and he makes them a better defensive matchup against Orlando, since Lewis has been extremely hesitant to drive this year, and Vince Carter treats contact like it's Semtex.

Furthermore, Amare just had a really good offensive game, scored 30. But he grabbed a paltry 8 rebounds and gave up 31-7 to Donte mother****ing Greene.

That's an abortion.

Pretty much. I've seen him play in person against my Bulls and he's a surprisingly weak defender, even more so in person. He's a good offensive player but he's inconsistent and weak. It's sad when you get manhandled on any possession against JOKEhem Noah lol.

I really hope we make a play for LeBron this offseason, at least Bosh. That's why we traded Salmons and his 5.8 million. We are 20 million under now.

DaKCMan AP 02-18-2010 01:02 PM

The best part about Jamison to Cleveland is it makes it unlikely that they'll get Bosh in the offseason. Wade + Bosh + Beasley in Miami = :)

Basileus777 02-18-2010 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6542261)
The best part about Jamison to Cleveland is it makes it unlikely that they'll get Bosh in the offseason. Wade + Bosh + Beasley in Miami = :)

The Cavs already lacked the cap room to sign a max free agent. The Varejao extension pretty much ended those hopes.

Titty Meat 02-18-2010 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 6542251)
Pretty much. I've seen him play in person against my Bulls and he's a surprisingly weak defender, even more so in person. He's a good offensive player but he's inconsistent and weak. It's sad when you get manhandled on any possession against JOKEhem Noah lol.

I really hope we make a play for LeBron this offseason, at least Bosh. That's why we traded Salmons and his 5.8 million. We are 20 million under now.

I say Lebron stays in Cleveland but D.Wade comes back home. That'd be awesome to have Rose & D.Wade both from Chicago.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 02-18-2010 01:50 PM

tough to see Landry go, but Im liking Martin ok and the Draft picks a lot. Great job Knicks! Good luck with all that available money!

DaKCMan AP 02-18-2010 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6542379)
I say Lebron stays in Cleveland but D.Wade comes back home. That'd be awesome to have Rose & D.Wade both from Chicago.

I don't see it happening. I think both stay put.

Chiefs Pantalones 02-18-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6542379)
I say Lebron stays in Cleveland but D.Wade comes back home. That'd be awesome to have Rose & D.Wade both from Chicago.

Yeah I hope something happens. That's why Chicago is doing this. We just traded Tyrus Thomas to the Bobcats. We're making a serious run for LeBron, Wade and Bosh this summer. Hopefully we get two of them. Everything is set in place, they just gotta wine and dine and give them the dough.

Basileus777 02-18-2010 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 6542448)
Yeah I hope something happens. That's why Chicago is doing this. We just traded Tyrus Thomas to the Bobcats. We're making a serious run for LeBron, Wade and Bosh this summer. Hopefully we get two of them. Everything is set in place, they just gotta wine and dine and give them the dough.

The Bulls don't have enough cap room to sign 2 max free agents. You needed to get rid of Deng/Hinrich to do that. They only cleared off Salmons's player option worth 5.8 mil.

Titty Meat 02-18-2010 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 6542448)
Yeah I hope something happens. That's why Chicago is doing this. We just traded Tyrus Thomas to the Bobcats. We're making a serious run for LeBron, Wade and Bosh this summer. Hopefully we get two of them. Everything is set in place, they just gotta wine and dine and give them the dough.

I always thought they should have traded for Garnett a few years ago when Heinrich was real good, Ben Gordon, ect.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.