ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Bradford or Clausen are there, Trading down? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=223470)

Ralphy Boy 02-15-2010 07:24 PM

Bradford or Clausen are there, Trading down?
 
In a thread over in the lounge, this was discussed.
Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 6534519)
A friend of mine who is really big into the 49ers told me his team thinks Claussen reminds them of another good ND QB Montana and they could use their two firsts to get him.

To that I replied with the following:
Quote:

Our #5 = 1700 pts
our #50 = 400 pts
Total = 2100

Their #13 = 1150
Their # 16 = 1000
Total = 2150

Seems like a fair trade, but then who do we draft?
When looking at what teams, drafting below us, might be interested in either Clausen or Bradford, I came up with very little.
San Fran, Jax, Seattle, Buffalo & Cleveland.
San Fran & Seattle certainly have the ammunition.

St Louis & Washington are both in need, but drafting ahead of us, so I don't see any scenario of both QB's being there.

We won't draft a QB in the first either way.

So finally, what if one of them is there? Who is likely to want either one of them? Who do we draft if we trade down?

Direckshun 02-15-2010 07:27 PM

I bet we'll still field offers if just one of them falls, which WILL happen if Rams go Suh.

We'll actually get LESS offers if both of them fall, because the remaining teams will have a better chance of "their guy" falling.

If Clausen falls to us, we'll get a buffet of offers. If Bradford falls, well. Maybe the Bills?

Of course, I'd just draft Clausen.

Saul Good 02-15-2010 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 6534735)
I bet we'll still field offers if just one of them falls, which WILL happen if Rams go Suh.

We'll actually get LESS offers if both of them fall, because the remaining teams will have a better chance of "their guy" falling.

If Clausen falls to us, we'll get a buffet of offers. If Bradford falls, well. Maybe the Bills?

Of course, I'd just draft Clausen.

Who would the Bills be bidding against?

Ralphy Boy 02-15-2010 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6534745)
Who would the Bills be bidding against?

Seattle, San Fran, Cleveland & Jax.

I would think Seattle would be the most likely player on Bradford.

DrRyan 02-15-2010 09:20 PM

If they traded down to 13 and 16 I would be happy to see any combo of McClain, Mays, Graham or D Williams. Graham and Williams might been "reaches" at those slots but I'd rather go that route than O line.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sfeihc 02-15-2010 09:25 PM

One scenario that could unfold;

1. STL-Suh
2 DET-McCoy
3. TB-Berry
4. WAS-Okung
5. Who wants that QB and what will they pay?

ForeverChiefs58 02-15-2010 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6534731)
In a thread over in the lounge, this was discussed.


To that I replied with the following:


When looking at what teams, drafting below us, might be interested in either Clausen or Bradford, I came up with very little.
San Fran, Jax, Seattle, Buffalo & Cleveland.
San Fran & Seattle certainly have the ammunition.

St Louis & Washington are both in need, but drafting ahead of us, so I don't see any scenario of both QB's being there.

We won't draft a QB in the first either way.

So finally, what if one of them is there? Who is likely to want either one of them? Who do we draft if we trade down?



A lot can change from now until April. What would be great is for a team to get infatuated with a QB, and then go all "New Orleans" and give up the farm for him. Make an offer that can't be refused

Touchdown Bowe 02-15-2010 09:45 PM

If Clausen falls to us at 5..we have to take him

Tribal Warfare 02-15-2010 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touchdown Bowe (Post 6535178)
If Clausen falls to us at 5..we have to take him

I agree if their is dissension amongst the ranks, I'd definitely pull the trigger. The kid has what it takes, Clausen has a solid physical skill set, leadership intangibles, and is very accurate.

ForeverChiefs58 02-15-2010 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6535344)
I agree if their is dissension amongst the ranks, I'd definitely pull the trigger. The kid has what it takes, Clausen has a solid physical skill set, leadership intangibles, and is very accurate.

Causen in the first, wr Golden Tate in the second, and OL Sam Young in the 5th.

Saccopoo 02-15-2010 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touchdown Bowe (Post 6535178)
If Clausen falls to us at 5..we have to take him

Yeah, because everyone is predicting him to be a slam dunk in the top four, and there will be massive amounts of teams wanting to trade up and draft him. Everyone loves an egotistical QB that achieved mediocrity in college.

Jimmy Clausen is Jay Cutler without the arm. You just keep on wanting to draft that. He'll really be good behind our kick ass offensive line too.

BryanBusby 02-16-2010 12:24 AM

I'd say if Clausen and Bradford are on the board at 5, I'm not liking the chances of the Chiefs being able to move down. The Rams are starved for a QB that doesn't completely blow and it'd say a lot if they took a pass on taking one since they get top choice on any QB they desire.

Tribal Warfare 02-16-2010 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6535588)
Jimmy Clausen is Jay Cutler without the arm. You just keep on wanting to draft that. He'll really be good behind our kick ass offensive line too.

Clausen is more cerebral than Cutler and won't make as many mistakes with football than Jay. IMO, Clausen will be a better version of Trent Green. In other words he'll run the system that he's been coached to play to at a very level.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-16-2010 02:15 AM

Notredameification?

The Franchise 02-16-2010 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6535588)
Yeah, because everyone is predicting him to be a slam dunk in the top four, and there will be massive amounts of teams wanting to trade up and draft him. Everyone loves an egotistical QB that achieved mediocrity in college.

Jimmy Clausen is Jay Cutler without the arm. You just keep on wanting to draft that. He'll really be good behind our kick ass offensive line too.

Let me guess.....you've watched 2 Notre Dame games......on YouTube.

Shut the **** up about players you know nothing about.

Chiefnj2 02-16-2010 10:40 AM

If you don't have a franchise QB, you need to find one. KC's draft board should probably have Bradford and Clausen as the #1 and #2 depending on their physicals.

The Franchise 02-16-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6536097)
If you don't have a franchise QB, you need to find one. KC's draft board should probably have Bradford and Clausen as the #1 and #2 depending on their physicals.

Exactly......more so on Clausen than Bradford....but that's just my personal opinion.

RustShack 02-16-2010 11:05 AM

Yeah I would rather have the player who is physically better and has already played in our system for years... but thats just me.

Mr. Laz 02-16-2010 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6536097)
If you don't have a franchise QB, you need to find one. KC's draft board should probably have Bradford and Clausen as the #1 and #2 depending on their physicals.

Bradford = gak

he throws like a girl

Tango&Cash 02-16-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6536164)
Bradford = gak

he throws like a girl

He reminds me of Chad Pennington.

ChiefsCountry 02-16-2010 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6535678)
IMO, Clausen will be a better version of Trent Green. In other words he'll run the system that he's been coached to play to at a very level.

Try Bernie Kosar.
Posted via Mobile Device

Ralphy Boy 02-16-2010 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6535344)
I agree if their is dissension amongst the ranks, I'd definitely pull the trigger. The kid has what it takes, Clausen has a solid physical skill set, leadership intangibles, and is very accurate.

Uh, did you read this?
Quote:

I grew up in Ojai, California, just up the highway from Clausen's high school alma mater of Oaks Christian in Thousand Oaks, California.

Clausen had a storied high-school career and that's putting it lightly.

He was 42-0 as a prep starter. He led Oaks Christian to their first-ever state title. He threw for 48 touchdowns his senior year. He was USA Today's Offensive Player of the Year.

He was the Golden Boy that everyone wanted.

But ask any parent, student, player, or coach who played with or against Jimmy Clausen, and you'll probably hear the same thing.

Arrogant jerk.

His reputation was awful at any school he played against. He quite simply thought he was better than everyone else and showed it.

He was the beneficiary of a great offensive line and a superb running back named Marc Taylor, who was also rated USA Today's top schoolboy running back.

There were entire games he never got pressured.

Then, there were the whispers that he was just like his father—a Todd Marinovich-fatherly-type who lived and breathed for his son's football career. He had Jimmy under the tutelage of Steve Clarkston, the celebrated "Quarterback Whisperer"—a private coach for parents who can afford to give their kid the best that money can buy.

He was a true freshman starter at Notre Dame.

His first two seasons at Notre Dame were, in truth, fairly mediocre. The Notre Dame teams were awful.

His junior season he finally delivered on his earlier promise. He finished the season with 3,722 yards passing, a 68.8 percent completion rate, 161.42 passer rating, 28 touchdowns, and four interceptions. Notre Dame finished 7-6 his final year.

Look closer at a lot of his games. He made an amazing amount of miscues to lose games in the final minutes, as opposed to say, Joe Montana, who seemed to shine in the fourth quarter.

His record was a pedestrian 16-18 as a starter.

I don't think that was an accident.

From before he stepped onto the field, he rubbed many people, and teammates, the wrong way, from his mega press conference as a high school senior, to his arriving at Notre Dame in a stretch Hummer, to his reputation as a cocky and brash jock.

I'm not sure that inspires anyone within a locker room.

Even his post-game interviews seemed to suggest that it was everyone else who was responsible for Notre Dame's losing ways.

After a close loss to Navy, he was quoted as saying, "Well, I did everything I had to do to win the game."

In other words, my teammates are a bunch of losers.

Ask anyone in San Diego and they'll probably say that Ryan Leaf had all the ability in the world.

It was his attitude that did him in.

Same thing with Jimmy Clausen.

If I were the General Manager of an NFL team, I would avoid Jimmy Clausen like the plague. Never mind a first-round pick; I wouldn't waste a seventh-rounder on the guy.

In fact, I'd make sure he was as far away from my locker room as humanly possible.

OnTheWarpath15 02-16-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6537512)
Uh, did you read this?

You have no idea who wrote that.

Think about some of the dipshits we have posting here, then re-consider.

Sounds like someone with an ax to grind.

The Franchise 02-16-2010 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6537512)
Uh, did you read this?

Considering that there isn't a link to go with it....I consider all of that bullshit from a guy who obviously has never liked Clausen.

OnTheWarpath15 02-16-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6537553)
Considering that there isn't a link to go with it....I consider all of that bullshit from a guy who obviously has never liked Clausen.

I can't take anyone serious that says he wouldn't use a 7th round pick to take Clausen.

It reads like it's written by someone Clausen played in HS, whipped his ass, is pissed off he doesn't have 0.00001% of the talent Clausen has, and is working at ****ing Burger King.

Mecca 02-16-2010 06:05 PM

If you read any McShay he doesn't like Clausen either so all of his takes are heavily skewed.

Also I don't care if Clausen is a dick, Phillip Rivers is a dick.

MahiMike 02-16-2010 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6534731)
In a thread over in the lounge, this was discussed.


To that I replied with the following:


When looking at what teams, drafting below us, might be interested in either Clausen or Bradford, I came up with very little.
San Fran, Jax, Seattle, Buffalo & Cleveland.
San Fran & Seattle certainly have the ammunition.

St Louis & Washington are both in need, but drafting ahead of us, so I don't see any scenario of both QB's being there.

We won't draft a QB in the first either way.

So finally, what if one of them is there? Who is likely to want either one of them? Who do we draft if we trade down?

That sounds nice. You can get 2 starters right off the bat. So many needs, just pick and start.

Coogs 02-17-2010 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6537512)
Uh, did you read this?

From ESPN.com...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft1...ory?id=4919917

Report: Clausen still recovering

Jimmy Clausen will have to impress teams with his head, not his arm, at the NFL scouting combine in Indianapolis next week.

During an interview on Sirius NFL Radio, the Notre Dame quarterback said that recovery from surgery to repair tendon damage in his right toe will prevent him from participating in drills.

"I'm planning on doing all the interviews and, obviously, being seen by the doctors so they can see my toe, but my toe isn't ready to go right now," Clausen said, according to NFL.com.

Clausen will have his toe examined on Thursday and could then host a pro day at Notre Dame in April, the Web site reported. The draft is April 22-24 at Radio City Music Hall in New York.

Clausen doesn't see the combine as a waste, even if he can't throw.

"I'm really excited to go down to Indianapolis next week so teams can get to know me as a person," Clausen said, according to NFL.com. "And I think after they get to know me as a person, they'll see the truth from what the perception is out there about me."

Clausen is a 6-foot-3, 223-pound junior who threw for 3,722 yards and 28 touchdowns with only four interceptions for Notre Dame last season.

Chiefnj2 02-17-2010 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6538582)
From ESPN.com...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft1...ory?id=4919917

Report: Clausen still recovering

Jimmy Clausen will have to impress teams with his head, not his arm, at the NFL scouting combine in Indianapolis next week.

During an interview on Sirius NFL Radio, the Notre Dame quarterback said that recovery from surgery to repair tendon damage in his right toe will prevent him from participating in drills.

"I'm planning on doing all the interviews and, obviously, being seen by the doctors so they can see my toe, but my toe isn't ready to go right now," Clausen said, according to NFL.com.

Clausen will have his toe examined on Thursday and could then host a pro day at Notre Dame in April, the Web site reported. The draft is April 22-24 at Radio City Music Hall in New York.

Clausen doesn't see the combine as a waste, even if he can't throw.

"I'm really excited to go down to Indianapolis next week so teams can get to know me as a person," Clausen said, according to NFL.com. "And I think after they get to know me as a person, they'll see the truth from what the perception is out there about me."

Clausen is a 6-foot-3, 223-pound junior who threw for 3,722 yards and 28 touchdowns with only four interceptions for Notre Dame last season.

Looks like he is aware of a poor public perception.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.