ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Pioli already knows who he's going to draft. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=224111)

googlegoogle 03-01-2010 04:13 PM

Pioli already knows who he's going to draft.
 
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=115&f=1837&t=5669684

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:17 PM

Those guys who think the combine doesn't matter at all are reeruned. It matters to DB's more than anything but it's also how guys with equal grades separate.

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 04:18 PM

:spock::nosmilie:

BigCatDaddy 03-01-2010 04:18 PM

He probably has as an idea. The Sr. Bowl and game film are way more important then the combine.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6567979)
He probably has as an idea. The Sr. Bowl and game film are way more important then the combine.

Yea the senior bowl is how Ryan Sims turned into a top 10 pick, I really wish people wouldn't jizz about the performances down there.

BigCatDaddy 03-01-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6567980)
Yea the senior bowl is how Ryan Sims turned into a top 10 pick, I really wish people wouldn't jizz about the performances down there.


But you do agree it's more important then the combine right?

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:20 PM

Depends on the position, for DB's the combine is extremely important.

warrior 03-01-2010 04:21 PM

:eek:

BigCatDaddy 03-01-2010 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6567987)
Depends on the position, for DB's the combine is extremely important.

But overall it's more important to see elite collge players line up again elite college players in pads.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6567979)
He probably has as an idea. The Sr. Bowl and game film are way more important then the combine.

No, they're not.

They're all factors in the decision but the Combines help to level the playing field due to the differences in talent across the country.

Also, the personal interviews reveal far more about an individual's character and motivation than game film. Do you seriously think it's wise to invest millions (if not tens of millions) without spending time to do complete an in-depth interview with these players?

It's extremely important to gauge their strength and speed, which is something that can't be garnered by game film.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6567991)
But overall it's more important to see elite collge players line up again elite college players in pads.

There are a lot of marginal speed WR's that make it in the NFL, there aren't any marginal speed CB's.

A CB running a crap time is a good way to not get drafted.

BigCatDaddy 03-01-2010 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6567994)
There are a lot of marginal speed WR's that make it in the NFL, there aren't any marginal speed CB's.

A CB running a crap time is a good way to not get drafted.

Really? What is marginal speed for a DB IMO? But you still never answered my question to you.

BigCatDaddy 03-01-2010 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6567992)
No, they're not.

They're all factors in the decision but the Combines help to level the playing field due to the differences in talent across the country.

Also, the personal interviews reveal far more about an individual's character and motivation than game film. Do you seriously think it's wise to invest millions (if not tens of millions) without spending time to do complete an in-depth interview with these players?

It's extremely important to gauge their strength and speed, which is something that can't be garnered by game film.

You win. How guys played football is less important then running in shorts. I'm from Mars and Draftubators are from Venus. I give up.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:28 PM

Considering if anyone is a very highly thought of prospect they don't go to the senior bowl I think it's overblown. You get guys like Brandon Graham down there going against an OT that's a 5th round prospect so it makes them look like gods.

If a CB times outside of a low 4.5 he's going to fall, the fact that Flowers couldn't get under 4.5 turned him from a top 20 pick into a 2nd rounder. If he had been running 4.6's he was looking at even more rounds.

That is a position where workouts can make or break you.

dirk digler 03-01-2010 04:30 PM

I think game film and having the scouts attend the games in person are alot more important than the combine or the All-Star games. I would rank the combine #2 mostly because of the interview process.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:31 PM

The combine is extremely important for outside players, if you're a WR or a DB and you post a 4.7 you just killed yourself.

For most everyone else it's not that big of a deal.

dirk digler 03-01-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568016)
The combine is extremely important for outside players, if you're a WR or a DB and you post a 4.7 you just killed yourself.

For most everyone else it's not that big of a deal.

I was watching part of the combine and one of the guys on NFL Network made a good point about running the 40. He said it really isn't a true measurement since the way they are running is not how they would run on the football field. I totally agree with that thinking.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:36 PM

It's not you can shave a couple tenths off your time by practicing how to start, but you need to post a certain time to be a "clean" prospect for a certain position.

Like a OT 40 is essentially useless I doubt any team moves linemen because of 40's CB's and WR's yea I think that happens.

dirk digler 03-01-2010 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568030)
It's not you can shave a couple tenths off your time by practicing how to start, but you need to post a certain time to be a "clean" prospect for a certain position.

Like a OT 40 is essentially useless I doubt any team moves linemen because of 40's CB's and WR's yea I think that happens.

There is no question it happens. Every year a player really helps or hurts himself with their 40 time.

I just thought it was an interesting point and it was brought up because Tate ran a 4.36 and most scouts\GM's think he is a 4.5 guy on the football field.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:45 PM

Tate probably helped himself some because it's such a blah RB class.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6568003)
You win. How guys played football is less important then running in shorts. I'm from Mars and Draftubators are from Venus. I give up.

What the **** are you talking about?

I stated that they are ALL factors.

Where did I point out that one was more important than another?

Learn how to ****ing READ before insulting others, Prick.

Hootie 03-01-2010 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6568053)
There is no question it happens. Every year a player really helps or hurts himself with their 40 time.

I just thought it was an interesting point and it was brought up because Tate ran a 4.36 and most scouts\GM's think he is a 4.5 guy on the football field.

I bet Tate ends up going top 25...

I could see 21 to Cincy, 22 to New England or 25 to Baltimore.

Mecca 03-01-2010 04:54 PM

Golden Tate's biggest problem is his height makes numerous teams think he's not an outside player.

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568086)
Golden Tate's biggest problem is his height makes numerous teams think he's not an outside player.

The strange thing about Golden Tate, as I watch him, he doesn't play like a small player. He plays like he's 6'3.

Hootie 03-01-2010 04:56 PM

I bet that Jimmy Graham cat ends up being a perennial pro bowl NFL TE...

I've always held firmly in my belief that NBA players would be superior to a lot of NFL players at WR and TE...just more athletically gifted.

This dude realizes he's a pretty good basketball player but not NBA caliber, switches to football, and now with NFL coaching he's going to be Gates version 2.0...

That dude looked like a freak when I was watching the combine.

Mr. Flopnuts 03-01-2010 04:57 PM

Where did that thread indicate anything that said Pioli knew who he was drafting already? Nuthooks.

And is it just me, or does WPI have a NY Giants fan for a moderator on their forums? Yeesh.

Hootie 03-01-2010 04:59 PM

I don't get why everyone doesn't already get it...

Pioli and the crew are going to make at least 3 or 4 head scratching draft picks that go against the "experts" projections just like they did every year in New England and the first year in Kansas City...

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568096)
I bet that Jimmy Graham cat ends up being a perennial pro bowl NFL TE...

I've always held firmly in my belief that NBA players would be superior to a lot of NFL players at WR and TE...just more athletically gifted.

This dude realizes he's a pretty good basketball player but not NBA caliber, switches to football, and now with NFL coaching he's going to be Gates version 2.0...

That dude looked like a freak when I was watching the combine.

Which is why Lebron James should go to the NFL :)

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568106)
I don't get why everyone doesn't already get it...

Pioli and the crew are going to make at least 3 or 4 head scratching draft picks that go against the "experts" projections just like they did every year in New England and the first year in Kansas City...

That really makes my day seeing how awful NE's drafts have been for about 6 years now.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:00 PM

and everyone is going to bitch and moan and yearn for Carl and Herm and then eventually as we continue to fail Pioli will go and someone else will come in down the line and then we're going to bitch and moan and yearn for whoever it is that is winning at the time etc. etc. etc.

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6568098)
Where did that thread indicate anything that said Pioli knew who he was drafting already? Nuthooks.

And is it just me, or does WPI have a NY Giants fan for a moderator on their forums? Yeesh.

Yeah I wondered the same thing...

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568110)
and everyone is going to bitch and moan and yearn for Carl and Herm and then eventually as we continue to fail Pioli will go and someone else will come in down the line and then we're going to bitch and moan and yearn for whoever it is that is winning at the time etc. etc. etc.

So you're saying that KC is doomed, regardless of who's running the show?

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568109)
That really makes my day seeing how awful NE's drafts have been for about 6 years now.

their 1st round picks haven't been that bad. Much better than ours, so we can't complain about them.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6568107)
Which is why Lebron James should go to the NFL :)

why would he do that when he is going to make a billion dollars in the NBA being the greatest player in the league?

His ceiling as an NFL TE or WR would be around what...$50M in contracts?

Lets have a little common sense here...

Guys would rather collect 8 times more as a 12th man in the NBA than bust their ass in the NFL and deal with all of the health risks later on in life for a fraction of the money that isn't guaranteed in the first place...

which is why Tony G always wanted to be in the NBA but he was never good enough...

In the NBA closed down for good and you could no longer make money playing professional basketball...the NFL would be taken over by NBA players...plain and simple...at least the skill positions like WR/TE/CB and possibly even LB and S and DE etc...

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6568116)
So you're saying that KC is doomed, regardless of who's running the show?

That's what I've come to expect, especially since joining this board.

I mean...

What are the odds anyone is happy after draft day this year?

I say 10%, tops.

I know you're all going to be pissed pretty much no matter what...

I'm still going to wait until about week 4 before I decide on whether or not I'm pro-Pioli or anti-Pioli...so stay tuned.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568109)
That really makes my day seeing how awful NE's drafts have been for about 6 years now.

yeah but I count Randy Moss and Wes Welker as part of their draft picks for 2007...which I doubt you do...so you have to give them an A+++ there

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6568117)
their 1st round picks haven't been that bad. Much better than ours, so we can't complain about them.

That's pretty debatable, there's Wilfork and Mayo...but Maroney and Ben Watson..and there are several other very bland picks.

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568119)
why would he do that when he is going to make a billion dollars in the NBA being the greatest player in the league?

His ceiling as an NFL TE or WR would be around what...$50M in contracts?

Lets have a little common sense here...

Guys would rather collect 8 times more as a 12th man in the NBA than bust their ass in the NFL and deal with all of the health risks later on in life for a fraction of the money that isn't guaranteed in the first place...

which is why Tony G always wanted to be in the NBA but he was never good enough...

In the NBA closed down for good and you could no longer make money playing professional basketball...the NFL would be taken over by NBA players...plain and simple...at least the skill positions like WR/TE/CB and possibly even LB and S and DE etc...

whoa, it was just a fantasy situation. Sure, business-wise for Lebron to go to the NFL would be dumb. But he loves football more than basketball, and it has always been a dream of his to play in the NFL. I was just saying he would be successful in the NFL.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:06 PM

I just hope we take all of those black dudes at the combine with no tattoos...that would be my draft strategy if I were GM...

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568125)
That's pretty debatable, there's Wilfork and Mayo...but Maroney and Ben Watson..and there are several other very bland picks.

They have atleast had a rookie of the year. The closest one of our rookies has been to winning ROTY over the last 5 years was probably Succop.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6568131)
whoa, it was just a fantasy situation. Sure, business-wise for Lebron to go to the NFL would be dumb. But he loves football more than basketball, and it has always been a dream of his to play in the NFL. I was just saying he would be successful in the NFL.

Yeah...

I think successful is an understatement...

I think he would be unstoppable and he'd break a shit ton of receiving records and he would pretty much be the most valuable player the NFL had ever seen, maybe even including QB's...

That dude would just be an unfair advantage.

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6568137)
They have atleast had a rookie of the year. The closest one of our rookies has been to winning ROTY over the last 5 years was probably Succop.

You could have the rookie of the year every year if you took a bunch of RB's and LB's that's not a good measure.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568125)
That's pretty debatable, there's Wilfork and Mayo...but Maroney and Ben Watson..and there are several other very bland picks.

what's funny is...

guys like Maroney and Watson were considered good picks by the experts at the time...

dirk digler 03-01-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568082)
I bet Tate ends up going top 25...

I could see 21 to Cincy, 22 to New England or 25 to Baltimore.

Since he ran a good 40 I am pretty sure he will. I was hoping he was going to fall to us in the 2nd round.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568120)
That's what I've come to expect, especially since joining this board.

I mean...

What are the odds anyone is happy after draft day this year?

I say 10%, tops.

I know you're all going to be pissed pretty much no matter what...

I'm still going to wait until about week 4 before I decide on whether or not I'm pro-Pioli or anti-Pioli...so stay tuned.

I'll only be "pissed" if I'm right.

I have absolutely no problem admitting I'm wrong but when it comes to the 2009 draft, I was right about the quality of our draft.

I'm fully prepared for the fact that Pioli will draft against the strengths of the draft board. I just hope that this year, he's right.

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568141)
Yeah...

I think successful is an understatement...

I think he would be unstoppable and he'd break a shit ton of receiving records and he would pretty much be the most valuable player the NFL had ever seen, maybe even including QB's...

That dude would just be an unfair advantage.

I just like to dream about it, considering he is my favorite athlete right now in sports and I don't even like basketball.

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568144)
what's funny is...

guys like Maroney and Watson were considered good picks by the experts at the time...

Watson is a great pick if you dig athletes who can't stay healthy, he never made it through college without getting hurt either.

And Maroney well I don't like taking marginal RB's that high.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568144)
what's funny is...

guys like Maroney and Watson were considered good picks by the experts at the time...

See, and that's okay.

If Pioli had taken highly rated prospect last year only to watch them fail in their first season, there's no shame or nothing wrong with that.

But when he goes far outside the parameters of normal thinking and still comes up empty, that's when we've got a problem.

And that thinking led to a 4-12 record in 2009 and very little positive contribution by the rookies in a year where if better choices had been made, there could have been massive amounts of contribution.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:10 PM

and to be honest with everyone...I've started to become really 'blah' when it comes to Berry.

I'd rather have Okung to be honest...I mean that dude is going to be a pro bowler no matter how you want to spin it.

It's not a sexy pick and it's even less sexy when you think about the fact we'd come out of three drafts with three top 5 picks with Jackson/Dorsey/Okung and Matt Cassel as our QB but I don't think you can think about the past when you're drafting for the future...gotta clean slate it every year...

Which is why Clausen seems like a good pick to me but I don't see that happening.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6568146)
I'll only be "pissed" if I'm right.

I have absolutely no problem admitting I'm wrong but when it comes to the 2009 draft, I was right about the quality of our draft.

I'm fully prepared for the fact that Pioli will draft against the strengths of the draft board. I just hope that this year, he's right.

Well you certainly look right about 2009 right now...

But come on, it's still a little early.

Would I rather have anyone other than Tyson Jackson?

Of course.

But I don't want to talk about it anymore and we'll see how much he sucks or doesn't suck in a few years.

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:17 PM

There's really no guarantee Okung is going to be a pro bowler.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568182)
There's really no guarantee Okung is going to be a pro bowler.

The guy has insane measurables and really seems like he's a Pioli guy...

I guess I'd be happy with the following players at #5:

Clausen, Berry, Okung, Bryant (maybe)

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:21 PM

I would have loved adding Donte Stallworth to our team...we need some god damn receivers.

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:23 PM

Bruce Campbell made Okungs measurables look average.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:23 PM

doubt it would happen since we already have a starter but think Thomas Jones would make a great 10 carry a game backup to Sir Charles...

Dave Lane 03-01-2010 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568182)
There's really no guarantee Okung is going to be a pro bowler.

Or Berry

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568195)
Bruce Campbell made Okungs measurables look average.

was it Casserly on NFL Network that wasn't impressed with Campbell's workout? Or Mayock? Or both? I forget...

and then the Vikings guy was saying how they don't generally move up people for having beastly workouts, but they certainly move people down or figure out how to stack certain players...that makes sense...

and why is Campbell playing OL rather than DL? Doesn't make sense to me either...

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:28 PM

and what's up with Jevan Snead?

Wasn't he being touted as a top tier QB prospect before last season? I know he bombed big time...so did he panic and just decide to declare? What round grade is he? Is he a 3rd rounder?

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568202)
was it Casserly on NFL Network that wasn't impressed with Campbell's workout? Or Mayock? Or both? I forget...

and then the Vikings guy was saying how they don't generally move up people for having beastly workouts, but they certainly move people down or figure out how to stack certain players...that makes sense...

and why is Campbell playing OL rather than DL? Doesn't make sense to me either...

Casserly... He's a dickhead anyway.

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:28 PM

Mike Mayock essentially came off as a complete moron for every single thing shown.

While some BYU guy was running he went into this big religious rant.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6568209)
Casserly... He's a dickhead anyway.

well he owned everyone when he took Mario Williams over Reggie Bush...

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568210)
Mike Mayock essentially came off as a complete moron for every single thing shown.

While some BYU guy was running he went into this big religious rant.

Eisen has had to interrupt Mayock a few different times because of inappropriate rambling.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568210)
Mike Mayock essentially came off as a complete moron for every single thing shown.

While some BYU guy was running he went into this big religious rant.

yeah Marshall Faulk owned him when he was trying to defend Urban Meyer's QB developing abilities

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:31 PM

He was also brilliant when he got his QB killed and said Colt Brennan was a 1st rounder.

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568217)
well he owned everyone when he took Mario Williams over Reggie Bush...

I didn't say he doesn't know football. He's just a dickhead. And his crap about Bruce Campbell was dumb though. You can't argue with the numbers and that's what he did.

Dave Lane 03-01-2010 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6568195)
Bruce Campbell made Okungs measurables look average.

He's a roided up freak that never had that level of play in college.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:33 PM

just another gut instinct...

Bruce Campbell just seems like a guy where the money might speak...

Okung comes off as a guy who wants to truly be good at football...

That's nothing but pure speculation with a hint of racist undertone.

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:35 PM

I don't know if I'd call Campbell a roided freak...all I'm saying is we should hire Maryland's strength and conditioning coach.

That guy takes great athletes and turns them into freaks.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:35 PM

I'm sorry, I like to tell it how I see it...

I truly don't trust the real ghetto'd out black players early on...

Too freaking risky to hand them so much money guaranteed...

Which is why I made that "no tattoo" comment earlier...

I know a lot of people are really sensitive about stereotypes and to each their own...but that's just how I see it.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:38 PM

I remember when New England was winning and media like Whitlock pointed to all of the white players they had as part of the reason for their success...

Now I don't think that's the full story behind their success...

But a $0.10 brain can only take a team so far...

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:38 PM

The idea that only white players are smart is pretty reeruned.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:40 PM

I agree...

I want to see as many black players on the Chiefs as possible...you can be as politically correct as you want but black people are just more athletic than white people the majority of the time...

and that's where the screening process comes in...

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-01-2010 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568206)
and what's up with Jevan Snead?

Wasn't he being touted as a top tier QB prospect before last season? I know he bombed big time...so did he panic and just decide to declare? What round grade is he? Is he a 3rd rounder?

Snead is probably a 3rd-4th rounder, IMO.

He's got a really good arm, but by most accounts, he's a ****ing dumbass.

He'd need a guy like Martz to get the most out of his passing abilities, but he's also going to have to apply himself.

He's as physically talented as any QB in the draft, but I wouldn't want him.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-01-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6568155)
and to be honest with everyone...I've started to become really 'blah' when it comes to Berry.

I'd rather have Okung to be honest...I mean that dude is going to be a pro bowler no matter how you want to spin it.

It's not a sexy pick and it's even less sexy when you think about the fact we'd come out of three drafts with three top 5 picks with Jackson/Dorsey/Okung and Matt Cassel as our QB but I don't think you can think about the past when you're drafting for the future...gotta clean slate it every year...

Which is why Clausen seems like a good pick to me but I don't see that happening.

FWIW, Okung is no better of a prospect than Jason Smith.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6568266)
FWIW, Okung is no better of a prospect than Jason Smith.

I don't think I watched the Rams even once this past season.

How well did Smith play?

KCrockaholic 03-01-2010 05:55 PM

I want to know how Okung is a guaranteed pro bowler? Prospects like him come through every single year.

Hootie 03-01-2010 05:58 PM

well I'd rather be drafting at #10 as opposed to #5 as a Chiefs fan, that's for sure

Mecca 03-01-2010 05:59 PM

Jason Smith is playing RT, so that kinda speaks to it...

googlegoogle 03-01-2010 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6567992)
No, they're not.

They're all factors in the decision but the Combines help to level the playing field due to the differences in talent across the country.

Also, the personal interviews reveal far more about an individual's character and motivation than game film. Do you seriously think it's wise to invest millions (if not tens of millions) without spending time to do complete an in-depth interview with these players?

It's extremely important to gauge their strength and speed, which is something that can't be garnered by game film.

No, Pioli has made statements that indicate that the combine is just a show.

I think he said he likes the interviews and that they're important.

He's said that game film and scouting are more important. Don't have the link.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by googlegoogle (Post 6568277)
No, Pioli has made statements that indicate that the combine is just a show.

I think he said he likes the interviews and that they're important.

He's said that game film and scouting are more important. Don't have the link.

Then Pioli's a ****ing moron.

Which shouldn't be a surprise.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.