ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Well, at least Matt Cassel has no excuses next year. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227145)

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:08 PM

Well, at least Matt Cassel has no excuses next year.
 
New OC. Check
New slot reciever. Check
New TE. Check
2 new G's Check
New C. Check
Solid LT with 2 years experience. Check
#1 WR with two 1,000 yard seasons (almost) first two seasons. Check
#2 WR with solid game. Check
2 great RB's. Check

Big Matt is all out of excuses except for a new RT.

Time to put up dude!

Mecca 04-23-2010 08:09 PM

This entire draft other than Berry and Arenas is about making Cassel look like he wasn't a bad decision...

2 guys were drafted that are basically designed to run little checkoff routes.

007 04-23-2010 08:09 PM

Nope. RT will still be a viable excuse.

TinyEvel 04-23-2010 08:10 PM

Anyone who thought we were going to draft Claussen is a fool. This team is all about Cassel.

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 6706825)
Nope. RT will still be a viable excuse.



Not at my house. :shake:

They set the table for this dude. Let's see what he's got.

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TinyEvel (Post 6706835)
Anyone who thought we were going to draft Claussen is a fool. This team is all about Cassel.

That's not what I said. Cassel got a bunch of new toys to play with. No excuses next year.

BigMeatballDave 04-23-2010 08:15 PM

**** Pioli. **** Cassel. **** this franchise.

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6706860)
**** Pioli. **** Cassel. **** this franchise.

I'm not going to go there. I've been with this team through a whole lot of bad. Pioli gave his boy all he needs to be successful. I look for Dorsey to move to NT, and Mcgee to move into the LDE position. Berry is a huge upgrade at Saftey. Two picks left tomorrow, not sure how they can be used to help the team this year. Hope we don't trade for anything more and keep our picks next year.

Cassel needs to step up and show he is what all the pundits said he was last year... which was a top 10 QB. God knows the defense suffered in this defense heavy draft... in order to give Cassel what he needs.

ArrowheadHawk 04-23-2010 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6706860)
**** Pioli. **** Cassel. **** this franchise.

Feel free to see the door.

kstater 04-23-2010 08:23 PM

So, at the end of the day, Matt Cassel has to perform next year to be considered for the long term future of the franchise? Hell, he could have told you that before the draft.

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6706911)
So, at the end of the day, Matt Cassel has to perform next year to be considered for the long term future of the franchise? Hell, he could have told you that before the draft.

Not exactly, but close. This was a defense heavy draft. We were forced into a 3-4 defense last season without the pieces in place. We could have filled many of those pieces last night and today. We started very nicely last night.

BUT, at the end of this year, Cassel has a clause in his contract that basically lets us walk away if he isn't the answer. Looks like we are going to have an answer to that question if nothing else this season.

DeezNutz 04-23-2010 08:31 PM

I love chasing bad decisions.

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6706953)
I love chasing bad decisions.

I'm not saying these are all bad decisions. Hell, they all could be great players. I hope they are.

Just sayin' though... Cassel will have no excuses come January.

My hope is he has us in the playoffs. But I'm not going to go to Vegas and bet the ranch.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-23-2010 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6706860)
**** Pioli. **** Cassel. **** this franchise.

This.

This is what happens when you are incapable of admitting you made a piss poor decision.

Mecca 04-23-2010 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706979)
I'm not saying these are all bad decisions. Hell, they all could be great players. I hope they are.

Just sayin' though... Cassel will have no excuses come January.

My hope is he has us in the playoffs. But I'm not going to go to Vegas and bet the ranch.

He's saying the Chiefs are making more bad decisions to cover the bad one of Cassel, right now I think it's correct.

DeezNutz 04-23-2010 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706979)
I'm not saying these are all bad decisions. Hell, they all could be great players. I hope they are.

Just sayin' though... Cassel will have no excuses come January.

My hope is he has us in the playoffs. But I'm not going to go to Vegas and bet the ranch.

Cassel is the bad decision that we've been chasing since the acquisition.

Today was appallingly bad and it's because of Pioli's nepotism.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-23-2010 08:39 PM

This pretty much guarantees that Matt Cassel is the QB for the next 5 years.

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706987)
He's saying the Chiefs are making more bad decisions to cover the bad one of Cassel, right now I think it's correct.

Got it!

Were going to find out this year if the 26 yard hail mary off the crossbar was the exception or the rule.

Mecca 04-23-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6707004)
Got it!

Were going to find out this year if the 26 yard hail mary off the crossbar was the exception or the rule.

That won't happen now because we're gonna run an offense where McCluster catches 90 passes 2 yards from the LOS.

DeezNutz 04-23-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6707004)
Got it!

Were going to find out this year if the 26 yard hail mary off the crossbar was the exception or the rule.

Cassel is shit. (c)

Coogs 04-23-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6706998)
This pretty much guarantees that Matt Cassel is the QB for the next 5 years.

With all these new additions they are giving him, if he plays anything like he did last season, he shouldn't see March 2011.

notorious 04-23-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6706998)
This pretty much guarantees that Matt Cassel is the QB for the next 5 years.

Hamas, you probably don't deserve this, and I know you are being sarcastic, but for even insinuating that Cassel will be the QB for 5 years calls for:


Antifreeze
Aids Tree
Get ****ed by a Combine
Impale yourself on a Red Spanish Pineapple


Whew.

DeezNutz 04-23-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6707012)
With all these new additions they are giving him, if he plays anything like he did last season, he shouldn't see March 2011.

It doesn't matter.

We have more than enough evidence to prove that Pioli is shockingly incompetent.

As Rany said about the Royals: "We must put our trust in God because we cannot trust our front office."

Mecca 04-23-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6707015)
Hamas, you probably don't deserve this, and I know you are being sarcastic, but for even insinuating that Cassel will be the QB for 5 years calls for:


Antifreeze
Aids Tree
Get ****ed by a Combine
Impale yourself on a Red Spanish Pineapple


Whew.

Think Scott Pioli is getting fired anytime soon? If not Cassel is gonna stay here, they'll continue to add players to make him look competent if they have to.

teedubya 04-23-2010 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6707015)
Hamas, you probably don't deserve this, and I know you are being sarcastic, but for even insinuating that Cassel will be the QB for 5 years calls for:


Antifreeze
Aids Tree
Get ****ed by a Combine
Impale yourself on a Red Spanish Pineapple


Whew.

Please don't forget a Ninja Black Egg to the eyes.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-23-2010 08:48 PM

**** it. I'm gonna write a novel of a post and put it on here in about an hour.

Molitoth 04-23-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6707041)
**** it. I'm gonna write a novel of a post and put it on here in about an hour.

wonderful. can you attach your suicide note?

chiefs1111 04-23-2010 08:53 PM

you know i think McCluster will be a good player for the Chiefs but damn it's where they took him at that really bugs me.

Hammock Parties 04-23-2010 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6707018)

As Rany said about the Royals: "We must put our trust in God because we cannot trust our front office."

And wouldn't you know it, the Broncos drafted Tebow.

****.

MoreLemonPledge 04-23-2010 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6707041)
**** it. I'm gonna write a novel of a post and put it on here in about an hour.

Cool. I hope you add the disclaimer that none of the players we've drafted have played a single down in the NFL yet.

Chiefnj2 04-23-2010 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706842)
That's not what I said. Cassel got a bunch of new toys to play with. No excuses next year.

He got broken, second hand toys to play with. The island of misfit draft picks and free agents.

notorious 04-23-2010 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6707019)
Think Scott Pioli is getting fired anytime soon? If not Cassel is gonna stay here, they'll continue to add players to make him look competent if they have to.

I know, but God Damnit we can dream, can't we?!

Hammock Parties 04-23-2010 09:00 PM

If Cassel is the next Trent Green like everybody around here wants, maybe next year we can add a wide receiver and have the #1 offense! It'll be just like old times.

Coogs 04-23-2010 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6707092)
He got broken, second hand toys to play with. The island of misfit draft picks and free agents.

True on a few of them. :)

But none the less, he has a roster full of new guys since he first stepped on the field as a Chief. Waters (nearly done) and Bowe are the only two that are not "new" since that day.

We should see some real progress if he is a true QB. And I have a feeling the opposing DC's are going to test him. Can't imagine many of them are going to go home with Charles hanging 200 on them as the first option.

Mecca 04-23-2010 09:02 PM

I hope Matt Cassel gets hit by a greyhound bus.

notorious 04-23-2010 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6707104)
If Cassel is the next Trent Green like everybody around here wants, maybe next year we can add a wide receiver and have the #1 offense! It'll be just like old times.

Yeaaaa! True Fans will suck each other off when we go 13-3 and get beat in the playoffs again!!!!


BTW I loved Trent Green, but I need to vent.

BIG K 04-23-2010 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706893)
I look for Dorsey to move to NT, and Mcgee to move into the LDE position.

I mentioned this once before. The Chiefs had the opportunity to draft a NT, A QB, and LT, they passed on all. It is my humble opinion that the Chiefs are confident in their new coaching staff to coach up all of the forementioned positions. I could very well see a beefed up Dorsey at NT with Jackson and Macgee on the edge. Cass get's another shot with a guy who knows a couple things about qb play. Do I agree entirely with the Chiefs thoughts? No, but just saying I can see what they are thinking.......

It should be apparent they believe in what they have at those positions and are relying on coaching to make it happen....

notorious 04-23-2010 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6707041)
**** it. I'm gonna write a novel of a post and put it on here in about an hour.

Let it be known to all that dwells on the Planet, this was the moment AfCasselstan was conceived.


http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227153

Consistent1 04-23-2010 10:51 PM

My guess right now is this does not turn out near as bad as what many are thinking right now.Last year's team did better than what I expected in truth.Was really expecting a team that might have the #1 pick in 2010.They do need a couple guys on D,but I have a strange feeling this turns out ok.I am not saying 10 wins or anything right now,but I think they actually might have built a little here if one does believe in Albert.I think the D will pull off a bit of a surprise and the team will improve and be decent.Don't believe Pioli has it all ****ed up just yet, and I really don't even care for him.Just an opinion.
Posted via Mobile Device

Fish 04-23-2010 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG K (Post 6707350)
I mentioned this once before. The Chiefs had the opportunity to draft a NT, A QB, and LT, they passed on all. It is my humble opinion that the Chiefs are confident in their new coaching staff to coach up all of the forementioned positions. I could very well see a beefed up Dorsey at NT with Jackson and Macgee on the edge. Cass get's another shot with a guy who knows a couple things about qb play. Do I agree entirely with the Chiefs thoughts? No, but just saying I can see what they are thinking.......

It should be apparent they believe in what they have at those positions and are relying on coaching to make it happen....

Dorsey is not going to play NT. He's too small. Hell he's barely 6'1" 297lbs. He's not going to "beef up" on Haley's Jazzercize conditioning program. And despite how much weight he could gain, he'd still be too small.

It seems that they're comfortable with Edwards and Smith.

BIG K 04-24-2010 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6707883)
Dorsey is not going to play NT. He's too small. Hell he's barely 6'1" 297lbs. He's not going to "beef up" on Haley's Jazzercize conditioning program. And despite how much weight he could gain, he'd still be too small.

It seems that they're comfortable with Edwards and Smith.

I respect your thoughts but, I will stand by my post. Dorsey at NT. You and everyone else can flame my ass later if I am wrong.......

ChiefsCountry 04-24-2010 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6707110)
I hope Matt Cassel gets hit by a greyhound bus.

I hope we can get him on a Moped like Percy Snow and the same result happen.

stevieray 04-24-2010 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706815)
New OC. Check
New slot reciever. Check
New TE. Check
2 new G's Check
New C. Check
Solid LT with 2 years experience. Check
#1 WR with two 1,000 yard seasons (almost) first two seasons. Check
#2 WR with solid game. Check
2 great RB's. Check

Big Matt is all out of excuses except for a new RT.

Time to put up dude!

interesting analogy that it's about excuses..I mean, teams shouldn't do what they can to help their offense succeed? or better yet, aren't you stating the reasons for the subpar performance of the offense?

...it's 11 guys, not 1.

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 02:48 AM

What are we waiting to see?
Last year Matt Cassel put a stat line almost as good as Tyler Thigpen's.
He threw for 21 TDs in the same exact offense that Brady threw 50 TDs for.
Pioli can surround him with the AFC All Star team but he's still a backup QB on most teams.

Hammock Parties 04-24-2010 02:48 AM

Oh god, KCJohnny has turned to the darkside.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2010 02:52 AM

You know what I'd like to do?

I'd like to find the guy that did this, rip his still beating heart out his chest and hold it in front of his face, so he can see how black it is before he dies.

GordonGekko 04-24-2010 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708452)
He threw for 21 TDs in the same exact offense that Brady threw 50 TDs for.

good point,

and it saddens me

Hammock Parties 04-24-2010 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6708461)
You know what I'd like to do?

I'd like to find the guy that did this, rip his still beating heart out his chest and hold it in front of his face, so he can see how black it is before he dies.

http://i.imgur.com/kkRFM.jpg

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 6708465)
good point,

and it saddens me

I could stomach him as a developmental QB if they hadn't invested $63 million in him. I think Croyle could get us to 9-7 this year by handing off to two 1 thousand yard RBs and converting some 3rd downs. He'd leave a bit more cap room for other weapons.

Tribal Warfare 04-24-2010 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6708109)
I hope we can get him on a Moped like Percy Snow and the same result happen.

I hope he gets assraped by a group of disease ridden chimpanzees

Rausch 04-24-2010 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708452)
What are we waiting to see?
Last year Matt Cassel put a stat line almost as good as Tyler Thigpen's.
He threw for 21 TDs in the same exact offense that Brady threw 50 TDs for.
Pioli can surround him with the AFC All Star team but he's still a backup QB on most teams.

If all else fails we were still right about DV...:evil:

Pushead2 04-24-2010 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708470)
I could stomach him as a developmental QB if they hadn't invested $63 million in him. I think Croyle could get us to 9-7 this year by handing off to two 1 thousand yard RBs and converting some 3rd downs. He'd leave a bit more cap room for other weapons.


people still talking about him? Shit...

Rausch 04-24-2010 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pushead2 (Post 6708487)
people still talking about him? Shit...

We pretty much have a highly paid Tyler THigpen RIGHT NOW...

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6708485)
If all else fails we were still right about DV...:evil:

Well Brad, I actually look back on the DV years with a bit of nostalgia now that they are safely in the rea-view mirror. Haley is the antiDV. Both his Coordinators can coach circles around him. Chiefs fans will have high expectations for a turnaround season in 2010, and I think they will be pleased for the most part. But as the OP asserts, no more excuses. Haley has everything all the post-Marty coaches did not except a pro-bowl QB (yes, DeBerg, Montana, Bono, Grbac, Green all made the PB in Chiefs red). But Pioli signed Cassel, and he's going with him hell or highwater.

With this stable of RBs and Crennel's 3-4, I realistically think this team can win 9 games next year. I would consider anything less than that underachievment. As we all know, the distance between 10-6 and 6-10 can be acouple turnovers and a STs play or two.

KCJ
:arrow:

The_Doctor10 04-24-2010 04:30 AM

Just for the sake of playing Devil's advocate...

Drew Brees was so piss-poor during his first go-round as Chargers starter that they drafted Rivers. Not saying that Cassel is Brees, but I am saying things were not exactly stacked in his favor last season.

- #1 Receiver out for 4 games due to substance abuse suspension.
- #2 Receiver doesn't get to KC till midway through the season.
- Stuck handing off to LJ for half the year.
- Offensive coordinator was fired before the start of the season.
- Offensive line had major issues throughout the season.

I will fully admit that he didn't play well even when Charles was tearing it up. But the situation he was put in was hardly one where you could legitimately expect success.

Now, with a new draft's worth of weapons, a re-tooled o-line, and a full off-season learning under Weis, I think it's reasonable to think that he can have a solid season. Maybe he doesn't make the Pro Bowl, but I think based on this off-season, he should have a markably better season this year as opposed to last. He did win 11 games two years ago (Which is still 1 more than the Chiefs have won in the past 3 seasons).

Always look on the bright side of life, peeps.

Slainte 04-24-2010 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708470)
He'd leave a bit more cap room for other weapons.

Yep. Right up on the edge of that cap thing, aren't we?

Rausch 04-24-2010 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708494)
I realistically think this team can win 9 games next year.

No chance in hell.

None.

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury (Post 6708503)
Just for the sake of playing Devil's advocate...

He did win 11 games two years ago (Which is still 1 more than the Chiefs have won in the past 3 seasons).

Always look on the bright side of life, peeps.

I applaud your optimism, buddy. But those 11 games were won with the same exact team that went 18-0, set a record for scoring offense and piled up 50 TD passes the year prior. We've seen Cassel pilot the most prolific offense in NFL history. 11-5, and 21 TD passes with the same exact team.

I hope he's AWESOME in KC with a more balanced offense that won't be running the spread like NE. But looks like Weis was brought in here to replicate the Pats spread O and we've already seen Cassel perform a workman-like fill-in role with average results. I'm 90% certain that nearly every back up QB in the NFL could have produced similar results on the 2008 Pats.

I just hope Haley/Weiss maximize what talent they HAVE and not hammer the available talent into the Kansas City Chieftriots. We've already seen this movie with Ramifization in 2001-2005.

:D

The_Doctor10 04-24-2010 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708509)
I applaud your optimism, buddy. But those 11 games were won with the same exact team that went 18-0, set a record for scoring offense and piled up 50 TD passes the year prior. We've seen Cassel pilot the most prolific offense in NFL history. 11-5, and 21 TD passes with the same exact team.

I hope he's AWESOME in KC with a more balanced offense that won't be running the spread like NE. But looks like Weis was brought in here to replicate the Pats spread O and we've already seen Cassel perform a workman-like fill-in role with average results. I'm 90% certain that nearly every back up QB in the NFL could have produced similar results on the 2008 Pats.

I just hope Haley/Weiss maximize what talent they HAVE and not hammer the available talent into the Kansas City Chieftriots. We've already seen this movie with Ramifization in 2001-2005.

:D

But the Pats under Weis were never really a true 'spread' team... It always struck me that they went more spread when McDaniels became OC and the got Moss and Welker. Until then, Brady had the rep of being able to make his WRs better; after 2008, it was the combo of Brady, the scheme, and his WRs that made the Patriots offense so scary.

Rausch 04-24-2010 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708509)

I just hope Haley/Weiss maximize what talent they HAVE and not hammer the available talent into the Kansas City Chieftriots. We've already seen this movie with Ramifization in 2001-2005.

:D

Again, stand up and bow.

We was right there.

'Course, we was also both dead wrong about Herm....BUT that's a different story...

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury (Post 6708511)
But the Pats under Weis were never really a true 'spread' team... It always struck me that they went more spread when McDaniels became OC and the got Moss and Welker. Until then, Brady had the rep of being able to make his WRs better; after 2008, it was the combo of Brady, the scheme, and his WRs that made the Patriots offense so scary.

Fair enough. I concede that McDaniels definitely went spread-ward. Off topic, do you see him running a spread in Donkeytown with Tim Tebow?

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6708512)
Again, stand up and bow.

We was right there.

'Course, we was also both dead wrong about Herm....BUT that's a different story...

LOL, well..... I never thought Herm was the answer, but I was willing to give him a chance. We both thought Herm would bring defense back to KC. Mea culpa on that one.

Q: will the Chiefs run a spread O in 2010? Is Haley looking for a Cards type O? We do not have the horses for that.

The_Doctor10 04-24-2010 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708513)
Fair enough. I concede that McDaniels definitely went spread-ward. Off topic, do you see him running a spread in Donkeytown with Tim Tebow?

I think Denver is honestly the best possible situation for Tebow. I know we all like to mock McFistpump but Kyle Neckbeard was a below-average QB at best in Chicago; the only reason he was thought to be a viable option is because he wasn't nearly the ****-up that Rex Grossman was, and the Bears were in an 'Any port in a storm' scenario. In Denver, while Orton wasn't exactly Drew Brees, he wasn't exactly a horrifically awful QB either. Josh McDaniels knows how to coach that position, for all his other questionable moves as a HC. I don't think he'll rush Tebow into action, and I think no other player on Denver's roster is going to have as much coaching and help as Tebow will.

Time will tell of course, but right now, I'd say the chances of Tebow being an NFL success, or at the very least, not an NFL failure, are the greatest in Denver. If he were to have gone to Buffalo or Jacksonville, I'd wager he'd be playing QB for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers in two years.

Rausch 04-24-2010 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708518)

Q: will the Chiefs run a spread O in 2010?

No.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708518)
Is Haley looking for a Cards type O?

I think his input has been removed from almost every aspect of the offensive philosophy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 6708518)
We do not have the horses for that.

Haley's idea of offense is gone. Out the window.

That's the whole idea. You draft players who can play a number of positions and then you don't have to replace a stud at position A or D, just an underpaid guy asked to play 2 or 3 positions...

KCJohnny 04-24-2010 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6708520)
No.

I think his input has been removed from almost every aspect of the offensive philosophy.



Haley's idea of offense is gone. Out the window.

That's the whole idea. You draft players who can play a number of positions and then you don't have to replace a stud at position A or D, just an underpaid guy asked to play 2 or 3 positions...

Really?
This is still the same Todd Haley that fired Chan Gailey right before the 2009 season so he could run 'his' offense. I hope you are right, but I somehow doubt it.

whoman69 04-24-2010 08:13 AM

You don't have Charles and Jones on your team and then run a spread. You don't draft a TE like Moeaki if you are going spread. This team might have some 5 receiver formations and look to get the defense to cover the whole field, but we're not a spread any more than we were with Trent Green and Priest Holmes.

Coogs 04-24-2010 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6708212)
interesting analogy that it's about excuses..I mean, teams shouldn't do what they can to help their offense succeed? or better yet, aren't you stating the reasons for the subpar performance of the offense?

...it's 11 guys, not 1.

That is really what I am saying. The reason for Cassel's sub-par performance last year centered around the idea that he didn't have any talent around him. He has been given talent. Damn near everywhere. And I like the talents of a lot of the guys we selected. The ball is in his court now. They sold us a bill of goods last year that said he was a top 10 QB in this league. We should see this fall if that is a true statement or not.

InChiefsHeaven 04-24-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6706860)
**** Pioli. **** Cassel. **** this franchise.

You know what? Blow it our your ass...go be a ****ing Donk-gay fan...

**** You...

Mr. Laz 04-24-2010 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706815)
New OC. Check
New slot reciever. Check
New TE. Check
2 new G's Check
New C. Check
Solid LT with 2 years experience. Check
#1 WR with two 1,000 yard seasons (almost) first two seasons. Check
#2 WR with solid game. Check
2 great RB's. Check

Big Matt is all out of excuses except for a new RT.

Time to put up dude!

where's the "improved OT's. Check"?

The Franchise 04-26-2010 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6706815)
New OC. Check
New slot reciever. Check
New TE. Check
2 new G's Check
New C. Check
Solid LT with 2 years experience. Check
#1 WR with two 1,000 yard seasons (almost) first two seasons. Check
#2 WR with solid game. Check
2 great RB's. Check

Big Matt is all out of excuses except for a new RT.

Time to put up dude!

And when he sucks....those will be the excuses that people use to give him another year.

DeezNutz 04-26-2010 09:13 AM

There will be all sorts of excuses. Just wait...

1. He's started for only two full seasons. Give him time!
2. Yet another OC! He needs consistency!
3. McCluster is still learning the system!
4. He's throwing to tiny targets!

Rinse, repeat.

L.A. Chieffan 04-26-2010 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6715408)
There will be all sorts of excuses. Just wait...

1. He's started for only two full seasons. Give him time!
2. Yet another OC! He needs consistency!
3. McCluster is still learning the system!
4. He's throwing to tiny targets!

Rinse, repeat.

Dont forget Albert is NOT a LT in this league!

&

If Moeaki didnt get injured Cassel wouldve had a check down on all those sacks!

The Franchise 04-26-2010 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6715416)
Dont forget Albert is NOT a LT in this league!

&

If Moeaki didnt get injured Cassel wouldve had a check down on all those sacks!

I can already see how it's going to play out next year. Cassel is going to put up his mediocre numbers once again, take a bunch of sacks and the front office is then going to blame Albert. The fans will scream for a LT in the 1st round and one more year for Cassel.

Mr. Laz 04-26-2010 09:19 AM

so if Albert and O'callaghan don't improve and Cassel has to run for his life again ... that's an excuse?

Amnorix 04-26-2010 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706824)
2 guys were drafted that are basically designed to run little checkoff routes.

So, you don't like Wes Welker and Kevin Faulk? Odd way to look at it.

The Franchise 04-26-2010 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6715420)
so if Albert and O'callaghan don't improve and Cassel has to run for his life again ... that's an excuse?

When does it become Cassel's fault for holding onto the ball to long?

KCChiefsMan 04-26-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6706860)
**** Pioli. **** Cassel. **** this franchise.

well, bye

Chiefnj2 04-26-2010 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6715423)
When does it become Cassel's fault for holding onto the ball to long?

What's funny is that people say the OL got better at the end of year, in part because sacks went down, but nobody wants to give any credit that the reason sacks were down may be because of the combination of improved OL play and Cassel getting rid of the ball faster.

Coogs 04-26-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6715420)
so if Albert and O'callaghan don't improve and Cassel has to run for his life again ... that's an excuse?

OK, here is my line of thinking. You are an opposing DC prepairing to play KC. Do you take away the run? Or do you take away the pass? If it is me, I take away Charles and see if Cassel can make the plays.

If opposing DC's do put 8 in the box to take Charles out of the gameplan, we now have the weapons for Cassel to make them pay. And those weapons can take the ball to the house. Bowe can. Chambers can. McCluster can. And Mieoke (sp) can. But Cassel has to be able to hit those receivers... something he was not able to do last season when given the opportunity to pass.

If he does hit them this season, this offense could be fun to watch. Damn fun. If he can not hit them... might be time for a new signal caller. Even if O'Callahan isn't the greatest RT in the league.

It's on Cassel. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Chiefnj2 04-26-2010 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6715453)
OK, here is my line of thinking. You are an opposing DC prepairing to play KC. Do you take away the run? Or do you take away the pass? If it is me, I take away Charles and see if Cassel can make the plays.

If opposing DC's do put 8 in the box to take Charles out of the gameplan, we now have the weapons for Cassel to make them pay. And those weapons can take the ball to the house. Bowe can. Chambers can. McCluster can. And Mieoke (sp) can. But Cassel has to be able to hit those receivers... something he was not able to do last season when given the opportunity to pass.

If he does hit them this season, this offense could be fun to watch. Damn fun. If he can not hit them... might be time for a new signal caller. Even if O'Callahan isn't the greatest RT in the league.

It's on Cassel. Nothing more. Nothing less.

You take away the run and let him throw to guys with hands of stone and a scatback KC is trying to convert.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.