ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rick Gosselin draft grade: Chiefs get A+ (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227224)

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:04 AM

Rick Gosselin draft grade: Chiefs get A+
 
I was pretty down on this draft outside of Berry but maybe I am just stupid.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...s.3f4b050.html

KANSAS CITY CHIEFS GRADE: A+
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...lelogo-kcc.gif The Chiefs drafted the NFL defensive rookie of the year in Berry – and a slew of other good players. Arenas was the best returner in the draft, and McCluster will give the AFC matchup problems at both running back and receiver.

Messier 04-25-2010 08:08 AM

Gosselin's a moron.

Reerun_KC 04-25-2010 08:09 AM

In before thread is hijacked with hate.

unothadeal 04-25-2010 08:10 AM

Just give us the Lombardi now

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6712224)
In before thread is hijacked with hate.

:)

No shit, while I don't care what most of the media heads write, I find it interesting that their level of intelligence is usually decided by how close they agree with the posters own opinions.

All I care about is what I see on the field, I will pass judgment at that time.

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6712224)
In before thread is hijacked with hate.

LMAO You were to late.

People think Gosselin makes the best mock drafts so I think his grade is pretty interesting.

Hoover 04-25-2010 08:16 AM

THIS DRAFT SUCKED, well except for Berry. WTF WAS SCOTT PIOLI DOING?

What? Rich Gosselin said it was an A+?

This could be the greatest draft ever. I can't wait for the season to start.

Quesadilla Joe 04-25-2010 08:16 AM

http://i43.tinypic.com/21k9mdi.png

:) :)

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712235)
LMAO You were to late.

People think Gosselin makes the best mock drafts so I think his grade is pretty interesting.


The same people that were agreeing with him before will be putting his teeth on the curb and stomping on the back of his head.

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712237)

Hope that makes up for Tebow. What are you going to do with Clady now that you have a LH QB? Move him to RT?

TheGuardian 04-25-2010 08:18 AM

Interesting because I've been reading around and most everyone thinks the chiefs had a great draft.

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712239)
The same people that were agreeing with him before will be putting his teeth on the curb and stomping on the back of his head.

Probably so but they do have valid complaints. I don't get ignoring the weakest part of your team for the 2nd year in a row.

Quesadilla Joe 04-25-2010 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712241)
Hope that makes up for Tebow. What are you going to do with Clady now that you have a LH QB? Move him to RT?

Tebow was the steal of the draft IMO. I don't know what happens with our tackles, we got two blue chip tackles though with Clady and Harris so no matter what Denver is fine.

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712247)
Probably so but they do have valid complaints. I don't get ignoring the weakest part of your team for the 2nd year in a row.

I am disappointed in the lack of LB and NT myself. What that tells me is Pioli and company think we can improve with what we already have.


I guess we shall see.

Delano 04-25-2010 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712248)
Tebow was the steal of the draft IMO. I don't know what happens with our tackles, we got two blue chip tackles though with Clady and Harris so no matter what Denver is fine.

If by steal you mean reach, then yeah.
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712248)
Tebow was the steal of the draft IMO. I don't know what happens with our tackles, we got two blue chip tackles though with Clady and Harris so no matter what Denver is fine.

Where was he going to be picked if they didn't snag him at 25?

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712249)
I am disappointed in the lack of LB and NT myself. What that tells me is Pioli and company think we can improve with what we already have.


I guess we shall see.

I can understand that thinking a little bit in regards to the D-Line because they are young but we really don't have any young players at LB. I don't see Vrabel, Corey Mays, Hali and Demarrio Williams really improving much if any.

Quesadilla Joe 04-25-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712253)
Where was he going to be picked if they didn't snag him at 25?

He wouldn't have lasted 10 more picks I know that. I am not trying to hijack this Chiefs thread and turn it into another Tebow thread, but I think Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-25-2010 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712248)
Tebow was the steal of the draft IMO. I don't know what happens with our tackles, we got two blue chip tackles though with Clady and Harris so no matter what Denver is fine.


He might have been the steal of the draft but he could have been stolen in the 5th round. McDaniels is a meth head.

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712255)
I can understand that thinking a little bit in regards to the D-Line because they are young but we really don't have any young players at LB. I don't see Vrabel, Corey Mays, Hali and Demarrio Williams really improving much if any.

Yea I have stated over and over before that I believe DJ has reached his ceiling so I am not changing my tune now. I just hope I am wrong about that.

Marcellus 04-25-2010 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712257)
He wouldn't have lasted 10 more picks I know that. I am not trying to hijack this Chiefs thread and turn it into another Tebow thread, but I think Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.

I am not a Tebow hater, he catches shit because of all the pub and his faith. He is a good kid.

That being said, I don't see him being successful in the NFL.

CosmicPal 04-25-2010 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712255)
I can understand that thinking a little bit in regards to the D-Line because they are young but we really don't have any young players at LB. I don't see Vrabel, Corey Mays, Hali and Demarrio Williams really improving much if any.

You forgot Belcher, Studebaker, Sheffield, Walters, Herron, and Derrick Johnson. :D

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 6712259)
He might have been the steal of the draft but he could have been stolen in the 5th round. McDaniels is a meth head.

LMAO

milkman 04-25-2010 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712239)
The same people that were agreeing with him before will be putting his teeth on the curb and stomping on the back of his head.

JFC, do you people understand that the reason that people look to Gossilin's draft isn't because he's some great ****ing evaluator?

His last mock draft for the first round is usually the most accurate because he has some of the best sources in the business.

His mocks leading up to his final mock are usually pretty ****ing bad because he's a ****ing moron on his own evaluations of talent and team needs.

Mr. Arrowhead 04-25-2010 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712257)
but I think Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.

Oh My, ROFL

Gonzo 04-25-2010 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712257)
He wouldn't have lasted 10 more picks I know that. I am not trying to hijack this Chiefs thread and turn it into another Tebow thread, but I think Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.

This has to be a mult account. No one is this stupid.
Posted via Mobile Device

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 6712262)
You forgot Belcher, Studebaker, Sheffield, Walters, Herron, and Derrick Johnson. :D

Ooops my bad :)

In all seriousness I do like Studebaker and I was kind of hoping Sheffield might be a starter then I realized he is going to be playing behind Hali.

Reerun_KC 04-25-2010 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6712266)
JFC, do you people understand that the reason that people look to Gossilin's draft isn't because he's some great ****ing evaluator?

His last mock draft for the first round is usually the most accurate because he has some of the best sources in the business.

His mocks leading up to his final mock are usually pretty ****ing bad because he's a ****ing moron on his own evaluations of talent and team needs.

See if NFL teams would listen to the CP Horsemen, the NFL as a whole would benefit greatly, Wouldnt you agree?

Messier 04-25-2010 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6712266)
JFC, do you people understand that the reason that people look to Gossilin's draft isn't because he's some great ****ing evaluator?

His last mock draft for the first round is usually the most accurate because he has some of the best sources in the business.

His mocks leading up to his final mock are usually pretty ****ing bad because he's a ****ing moron on his own evaluations of talent and team needs.

Shut up!

milkman 04-25-2010 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6712273)
See if NFL teams would listen to the CP Horsemen, the NFL as a whole would benefit greatly, Wouldnt you agree?

Just shut up.

You're a ****ing hypocrite, and I got no ****ing use for hypocrites.

bevischief 04-25-2010 08:37 AM

When was the last time anyone every gave the Chiefs A+ draft?

Messier 04-25-2010 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 6712280)
When was the last time anyone every gave the Chiefs A+ draft?

Two years ago.

FlaChief58 04-25-2010 08:40 AM

If by hof you mean home of the forgotten, then I agree
Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712257)
He wouldn't have lasted 10 more picks I know that. I am not trying to hijack this Chiefs thread and turn it into another Tebow thread, but I think Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.


Lzen 04-25-2010 08:40 AM

I think some people feel as though they are smarter than Pioli and Haley and could run a draft better. Sure, I was kind of scratching my head with some of those picks. But I think it's completely unfair and quite frankly, moronic to say they had a bad draft when we don't know how these guys will pan out. I have always felt that you can't judge a draft until at least 3-4 years down the road.

I will trust the guys at One Arrowhead for now and take a wait and see approach. I think they at least deserve that.

As for the LB corps and the NT position, I wish we would have addressed those. But I also wonder if they feel that they could not address all of those needs in this on draft. Perhaps we will see a FA or 2 and then they address the LB and NT issue in next year's draft.

TEX 04-25-2010 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712217)
I was pretty down on this draft outside of Berry but maybe I am just stupid.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...s.3f4b050.html

KANSAS CITY CHIEFS GRADE: A+
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...lelogo-kcc.gif The Chiefs drafted the NFL defensive rookie of the year in Berry – and a slew of other good players. Arenas was the best returner in the draft, and McCluster will give the AFC matchup problems at both running back and receiver.

ROFL

-King- 04-25-2010 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6712266)
JFC, do you people understand that the reason that people look to Gossilin's draft isn't because he's some great ****ing evaluator?

His last mock draft for the first round is usually the most accurate because he has some of the best sources in the business.

His mocks leading up to his final mock are usually pretty ****ing bad because he's a ****ing moron on his own evaluations of talent and team needs.

That's cause his 1st two aren't really mocks.
Posted via Mobile Device

CupidStunt 04-25-2010 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712257)
He wouldn't have lasted 10 more picks I know that. I am not trying to hijack this Chiefs thread and turn it into another Tebow thread, but I think Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

TEX 04-25-2010 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 6712285)
I think some people feel as though they are smarter than Pioli and Haley and could run a draft better. Sure, I was kind of scratching my head with some of those picks. But I think it's completely unfair and quite frankly, moronic to say they had a bad draft when we don't know how these guys will pan out. I have always felt that you can't judge a draft until at least 3-4 years down the road.

I will trust the guys at One Arrowhead for now and take a wait and see approach. I think they at least deserve that.

As for the LB corps and the NT position, I wish we would have addressed those. But I also wonder if they feel that they could not address all of those needs in this on draft. Perhaps we will see a FA or 2 and then they address the LB and NT issue in next year's draft.


No - what's completely unfair is to forget that everyone is entitled to thier own opinion. If it's different from yours, it's not moronic, it's just a difference of opinion.

Ugly Duck 04-25-2010 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6712257)
Tebow will be in the HOF when all is said and done.

Kewl! I didn't know there is a College Football Hall of Fame. Where is that, anyway?

dirk digler 04-25-2010 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 6712285)

As for the LB corps and the NT position, I wish we would have addressed those. But I also wonder if they feel that they could not address all of those needs in this on draft. Perhaps we will see a FA or 2 and then they address the LB and NT issue in next year's draft.

Unfortunately that is what I am thinking. IMO that is kind of backwards considering to run the 3-4 effective you need a dominant NT and linebackers. They probably should have started with those first and worked on the secondary last outside of Berry.

Gonzo 04-25-2010 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 6712294)
No - what's completely unfair is to forget that everyone is entitled to thier own opinion. If it's different from yours, it's not moronic, it's just a difference of opinion.

Really? C'mon man, you've been around here long enough to know that if you're opinion is not that of the consensus, you're and idiot.

:D
Posted via Mobile Device

TEX 04-25-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 6712280)
When was the last time anyone every gave the Chiefs A+ draft?

As others have said - 2 years ago. How's that one turnng out?

TEX 04-25-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 6712300)
Really? C'mon man, you've been around here long enough to know that if you're opinion is not that of the consensus, you're and idiot.

:D
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh yeah - I forgot. This IDIOT stands corrected! :doh!:

ILChief 04-25-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 6712296)
Kewl! I didn't know there is a College Football Hall of Fame. Where is that, anyway?

South Bend

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712249)
I am disappointed in the lack of LB and NT myself. What that tells me is Pioli and company think we can improve with what we already have.


I guess we shall see.

No, I think it means that in the later rounds, you stick to your board. You don't panic and draft based on 2 positions. It's not like this is our only chance to get NTs and OLBs. We have two seasons, including a loaded free agency market in 2011, to get those guys. In the meantime, we have guys who are serviceable.

rockymtnchief 04-25-2010 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712297)
Unfortunately that is what I am thinking. IMO that is kind of backwards considering to run the 3-4 effective you need a dominant NT and linebackers. They probably should have started with those first and worked on the secondary last outside of Berry.

That's my thinking. KC just spent the last couple days making a delicious frosting to put on a turd cake. They built a beautiful home built on a sand foundation. Chip Foos rims on a Pinto.

Get the good stuff underneath, then top it off with something sweet. Not the other way around.

I don't mind who they took. It's who was left available that left me scratching my head.

jAZ 04-25-2010 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6712232)
All I care about is what I see on the field, I will pass judgment at that time.

We sew hate in these parts, boy. Die in an AIDS tree filled with Al Davis and a herd of humping monkeys.

Mosbonian 04-25-2010 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 6712294)
No - what's completely unfair is to forget that everyone is entitled to thier own opinion. If it's different from yours, it's not moronic, it's just a difference of opinion.

If people only truly followed your above statement, the Planet during the month of April might be fun to read and offer discussions. But unfortunately it doesn't happen that way...Gonzo is right in that if you don't hate on something then you are labeled an idiot.

For me....there is one person on here that I really respect when it comes to draft/player evaluation. And rather than spend my time reading all the vitriol I just wait to see his takes.

mmaddog
********

jAZ 04-25-2010 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712297)
Unfortunately that is what I am thinking. IMO that is kind of backwards considering to run the 3-4 effective you need a dominant NT and linebackers. They probably should have started with those first and worked on the secondary last outside of Berry.

If these guys have a high positional value on the DL and they passed on DL the entire weekend, my guess is that they didn't think this was a very good draft at the position(s) and with the draft's overall depth they filled other holes with better players.

If Cody is the best player we could have gotten at #2 and we'd never pick him on our team because he's fat and lazy, I'm guessing we weren't that impressed with the position overall in this draft.

Gonzo 04-25-2010 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmaddog (Post 6712339)
Gonzo is right

This is really all you people need to know, ever.

:D
Posted via Mobile Device

dirk digler 04-25-2010 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockymtnchief (Post 6712323)
That's my thinking. KC just spent the last couple days making a delicious frosting to put on a turd cake. They built a beautiful home built on a sand foundation. Chip Foos rims on a Pinto.

Get the good stuff underneath, then top it off with something sweet. Not the other way around.

I don't mind who they took. It's who was left available that left me scratching my head.

Yep build the foundation and then you can add all the special parts.

The Bad Guy 04-25-2010 09:17 AM

I respect this guys opinion more than any other so I think it's a good thing he gave us the highest grade.

milkman 04-25-2010 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6712358)
I respect this guys opinion more than any other so I think it's a good thing he gave us the highest grade.

When it comes to his own opinions, he's about as useless as everyone else out there.

the Talking Can 04-25-2010 09:27 AM

he also said:

"Kindle and Cody were steals." for the ravens


True Fans spent yesterday swearing they were bad picks and thank god we didn't take them....so i'm guessing they will all now admit to being wrong, since Gosselin has spoken

the Talking Can 04-25-2010 09:29 AM

he also said:

"A team with quarterback problems no longer has any with the arrivals of Clausen and Pike"

of carolina


good thing we weren't a team with a quarterback problem...again, i'm guessing this the thread the True Fans admit to being wrong about Claussen since Gosselin has spoken

Pasta Little Brioni 04-25-2010 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 6712288)
ROFL

What did he say that wasn't true? I'd have gone differently with those picks, but McCluster is a dynamic player and it will cause nightmares for defenses trying to defend him and Charles. Boy it will suck having 2 guys that can turn a short pass or any run into a long TD.

PatriotReign 04-25-2010 09:31 AM

Chiefs are at least an 8 win team.

They battle with Denver for 2nd spot in the AFCW

notorious 04-25-2010 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 6712372)
What did he say that wasn't true? I'd have gone differently with those picks, but McCluster is a dynamic player and it will cause nightmares for defenses trying to defend him and Charles. Boy it will suck having 2 guys that can turn a short pass or any run into a long TD.

This is the new KC Chiefs.

When you can't stretch the field with the long ball, stretch the swing pass.

PatriotReign 04-25-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6712375)
This is the new KC Chiefs.

When you can't stretch the field with the long ball, stretch the swing pass.

Screens and misdirection plays.

milkman 04-25-2010 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6712367)
he also said:

"Kindle and Cody were steals." for the ravens


True Fans spent yesterday swearing they were bad picks and thank god we didn't take them....so i'm guessing they will all now admit to being wrong, since Gosselin has spoken

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6712371)
he also said:

"A team with quarterback problems no longer has any with the arrivals of Clausen and Pike"

of carolina


good thing we weren't a team with a quarterback problem...again, i'm guessing this the thread the True Fans admit to being wrong about Claussen since Gosselin has spoken

This should be interesting.

gblowfish 04-25-2010 09:43 AM

Chiefs might win six games this year.
You can't fix it all in one year, with one draft.
Still need a tackle, inside linebacker, wide receiver, nose tackle.
That's next year.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2010 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6712367)
he also said:

"Kindle and Cody were steals." for the ravens


True Fans spent yesterday swearing they were bad picks and thank god we didn't take them....so i'm guessing they will all now admit to being wrong, since Gosselin has spoken

I don't understand the obsession with Kindle/Cody. Would they have been good picks at that spot? Yeah. But both come with a lot of risk. Kindle with his injured legs and Cody with his weight/motivation issues. There's a reason both fell as low as they did.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2010 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6712371)
he also said:

"A team with quarterback problems no longer has any with the arrivals of Clausen and Pike"

of carolina


good thing we weren't a team with a quarterback problem...again, i'm guessing this the thread the True Fans admit to being wrong about Claussen since Gosselin has spoken

I would have taken Clausen. Hindsight is 20/20--I would have taken him in the first, given that nobody had any idea he'd slide that low. And I'd have to think that if he fell to 50, the Chiefs would have taken him. But given we knew he'd fall 10 spots from where he eventually landed, it would have been a reach.

milkman 04-25-2010 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6712396)
I don't understand the obsession with Kindle/Cody. Would they have been good picks at that spot? Yeah. But both come with a lot of risk. Kindle with his injured legs and Cody with his weight/motivation issues. There's a reason both fell as low as they did.

But Gosselin gave our draft a good grade, and everyone says they'll take his words more than any one else, so, you can't just pick and choose which of his words carry more weight.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 6712395)
Chiefs might win six games this year.
You can't fix it all in one year, with one draft.
Still need a tackle, inside linebacker, wide receiver, nose tackle.
That's next year.

And keep in mind that we're never going to be perfect at every position--if I had to choose, I'd pick ILB and maybe receiver (given Weis' offensive approach) as way down on the priority list. And also that the free agency market in 2011 is going to be extremely rich with two classes of URFAs, essentially, and if Pioli's track record tells us anything, it's probably a year you expect him to load up on players.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2010 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6712399)
But Gosselin gave our draft a good grade, and everyone says they'll take his words more than any one else, so, you can't just pick and choose which of his words carry more weight.

I really like Gosselin.

I liked Kindle. I liked Cody. And I really liked Clausen. Either of them would have done fine.

But Gosselin also says we got good value in McCluster and Arenas. I'm so-so on the Arenas pick. I'm just trying to understand why so many people are pissed off to all hell that this was such a missed pick when most of the draft experts like Gosselin seem to love it.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2010 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6712402)
I really like Gosselin.

I liked Kindle. I liked Cody. And I really liked Clausen. Either of them would have done fine.

But Gosselin also says we got good value in McCluster and Arenas. I'm so-so on the Arenas pick. I'm just trying to understand why so many people are pissed off to all hell that this was such a missed pick when most of the draft experts like Gosselin seem to love it.

And by the way, since the claim was that Gosselin has great sources, I think the point to be made is that if Gosselin rated the draft as an A+, that's a sign that he's saying "based on what I know from my sources, this was the right spot to take these guys."

milkman 04-25-2010 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6712404)
And by the way, since the claim was that Gosselin has great sources, I think the point to be made is that if Gosselin rated the draft as an A+, that's a sign that he's saying "based on what I know from my sources, this was the right spot to take these guys."

He has great sources for his final mock.

Does he use these sources to write his grades?

Sully 04-25-2010 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6712399)
But Gosselin gave our draft a good grade, and everyone says they'll take his words more than any one else, so, you can't just pick and choose which of his words carry more weight.

That's silly.
There are thousands of people in the world who's opinion I value more than others(in any number of topics), but also pick and choose what I agree and disagree with.

LaChapelle 04-25-2010 09:55 AM

A+ for trying to sell tickets
It's a business first and hometown points is what the average ticket buyer wants
No QB in this class could've done that

dirk digler 04-25-2010 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6712371)
he also said:

"A team with quarterback problems no longer has any with the arrivals of Clausen and Pike"

of carolina


good thing we weren't a team with a quarterback problem...again, i'm guessing this the thread the True Fans admit to being wrong about Claussen since Gosselin has spoken

I didn't like hardly any of the picks and haven't defended many of them but alot of the so-called experts like our draft so maybe I am just stupid. That wouldn't be some kind of shock or anything.

milkman 04-25-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 6712413)
That's silly.
There are thousands of people in the world who's opinion I value more than others(in any number of topics), but also pick and choose what I agree and disagree with.

Thank you.

You simply proved TC's point.

The Bad Guy 04-25-2010 09:59 AM

I'm going to say it right now. Jimmy Clausen will not beat out Matt Moore.

Mosbonian 04-25-2010 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6712417)
I didn't like hardly any of the picks and haven't defended many of them but alot of the so-called experts like our draft so maybe I am just stupid. That wouldn't be some kind of shock or anything.

I am ok with you or anyone scratching their head if they don't agree....that's just a difference in opinion, which is part of how this place got started.

It's when the discussions get personal that I shake my head and wonder.

mmaddog
********

milkman 04-25-2010 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6712423)
I'm going to say it right now. Jimmy Clausen will not beat out Matt Moore.

I don't give a rat's ass about Jimmy Clasen.

Never once have I said that he's a guy that I wanted.

I have always said that I wasn't sold on him.

This isn't about any specific player.

This is about full time players vs. part time players.

Mr. Laz 04-25-2010 10:06 AM

I hope Gosselin is right but i just don't see it.

imo there is no way that McCluster makes up for that fact that our run defense sucks ass.

imo there is no way Arenas improves the return game enough to make up for having bad linebackers in a 3-4 defense.

DBOSHO 04-25-2010 10:16 AM

I have a hard time believing that we had a better draft than the seahawks.

Mosbonian 04-25-2010 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6712439)
I hope Gosselin is right but i just don't see it.

imo there is no way that McCluster makes up for that fact that our run defense sucks ass.

imo there is no way Arenas improves the return game enough to make up for having bad linebackers in a 3-4 defense.

And you could be absolutely correct....but I don't think that Cody or Kindle would have made that much of a difference either. There are just too many people dogging Cody for his work ethic (as they did the kid from NC). And Kindle came with injury concerns....

Now...were there other Defensive studs we could have taken there? I'm not the expert. But it seems there were some that were available in later rounds that made me scratch my head as to why we didn't take a flyer on.

mmaddog
********

dirk digler 04-25-2010 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6712431)

This isn't about any specific player.

This is about full time players vs. part time players.

This is pretty much my main complaint. I wanted 4 starters at the end of round 3 I think we got 2.

dirk digler 04-25-2010 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmaddog (Post 6712430)
I am ok with you or anyone scratching their head if they don't agree....that's just a difference in opinion, which is part of how this place got started.

It's when the discussions get personal that I shake my head and wonder.

mmaddog
********

I mostly agree but I was pretty pissed on Friday night and it wasn't a good sight. :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.