ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Haley and Pioli: A History of Getting Their Asses Kicked (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=252365)

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 08:46 PM

Haley and Pioli: A History of Getting Their Asses Kicked
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz
In KC history, the Chiefs have lost by more than four touchdowns at home only five times, four of which have occurred under Pioli and Haley.

Yep, these guys have a penchant for getting dominated. Let's review:

2009

Ravens 38, Chiefs 24 - A "close game," but the Chiefs get outgained 501-188. Total domination by the Ravens.

Eagles 34, Chiefs 14 - Outgained 420-196. Cassel has a 124.5 QB rating, cus he's awesome.

Giants 27, Chiefs 16 - The Chiefs score two garbage time TDs that makes the score appear closer than it really was. 429-212.

Chargers 37, Chiefs 7 - Pitiful. 403-203.

Chargers 43, Chiefs 13 - Disgusting. 426-284.

Broncos 44, Chiefs 13 - Appalling. 413-222.


2010

Broncos 49, Chiefs 29 - Suddenly, smart fans realize Pioli and Haley are huge frauds.

Chargers 31, Chiefs 0 - 426-67. Brodie Croyle, you say? I say, look at the first game of 2009. No excuses for this.

Raiders 31, Chiefs 10 - 344-201

Ravens 30, Chiefs 7 - Hey, look! 32 games into the Pioli era and the Chiefs are still getting their asses kicked by the Baltimore Ravens! 390-161.


2011

Bills 41, Chiefs 7 - 364-213

Lions 48, Chiefs 3 - 411-267

Dolphins 31, Chiefs 3 - 351-343. I didn't even realize it was possible to match an opponent yard for yard and lose by 28 with NO TURNOVERS.


Summary:

Haley is 18-23 counting the 2010 Baltimore Ravens playoff scrimmage. In 13 of his 23 losses the team has been outright dominated. And THE MAJORITY of those blowouts have come in the last two years when the Chiefs were supposedly "getting better."

Seven of those losses have come at home, meaning that at least twice a year, Arrowhead Stadium season ticket holders can count on witnessing a complete embarrassment. That's 25% of their gameday experiences for the year. One quarter of the time, Haley and Pioli embarrass Arrowhead Stadium.

Future potential blowouts:

@ New England
Pittsburgh
@Chicago
@New York
Green Bay
Oakland

SPATCH 11-09-2011 08:47 PM

dumb stat clay

lcarus 11-09-2011 08:48 PM

2009 - Matt Cassel
2010 - Matt Cassel
2011 - Matt Cassel
2012??? - Matt Cassel

F MY LIFE

Bugeater 11-09-2011 08:48 PM

What in the blue hell do you have going on in your avatar now? I think I'm going to have to adblock that thing before it induces a seizure.

Okie_Apparition 11-09-2011 08:51 PM

You took away the gifs
no one cares anymore

Fritz88 11-09-2011 08:51 PM

Pioli letting Haley get Pandergast still stings my heart.

O.city 11-09-2011 08:55 PM

Until we get a competent qb it really doesn't matter to me who these guys draft/bring in to "rebuild".

The 2010 Panthers were 2-14, drafted a qb, likely have less talent than we have (although they are talented) and are coached by a first year coach. Think we would beat them right now?

O.city 11-09-2011 09:00 PM

We are 3 years into this regime. When they came in the roster was pretty void of talent. The talent that was here was either old or very young in it's first or second year. I'll give them that it takes time to build up a roster but I can't excuse them from forgetting about the most important position on the field.

We are a very young team right now and are actually when healthy pretty solid 1-21. It's like Hamas said we just aren't talented enough on the back side to take on the injuries we had this year.

Whether it's right or wrong I think the injuries get Haley a pass this year, along with the way the team fought back to get back to 500.

FAX 11-09-2011 09:07 PM

Dang, dude. That took a lot of effort ... for not much impact. I have an idea. Maybe you could start dedicating some of your time and energy to a charity.

By the way, how's LJ these days?

FAX

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8096003)
Dang, dude. That took a lot of effort ... for not much impact. I have an idea. Maybe you could start dedicating some of your time and energy to a charity.

By the way, how's LJ these days?

FAX

When's the last time you actually went to a Chiefs game?

FAX 11-09-2011 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096008)
When's the last time you actually went to a Chiefs game?

It's been awhile.

I'll go again soon, though.

FAX

stevieray 11-09-2011 09:10 PM

you're bipolar.

film at 11.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8096013)
It's been awhile.

I'll go again soon, though.

FAX

Choose carefully. You have a 1 in 4 of chance of witnessing the Chiefs getting their asses kicked.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/p2-fFJM6jtE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BigRock 11-09-2011 09:19 PM

Not to worry, I hear Jeff Fisher's taking over any day now.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8096058)
Not to worry, I hear Jeff Fisher's taking over any day now.

That would be the final nail in Pioli's coffin.

ChiefsCountry 11-09-2011 09:29 PM

The fraud is Matt Cassel. It's Pioli first and stupidest ****ing move and alot of us knew it the day it happened. Februay 28, 2009 is the darkest day in Chiefs history, bc we are actually building a championship roster with a shitty QB leading us.

BossChief 11-09-2011 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 8095960)
Pioli letting Haley get Pandergast still stings my heart.

yeah, except Haley never hired him as his DC...he was hired as a defensive coach with a title to be named later.

He was only named the DC once Romeo turned Pioli down for the job in 2009 because he wasn't healthy enough.

...

I think its laughable how some here seem to get a stiffy from talking about the Chiefs losing games over the course of rebuilding years by a greater margin than back in the perennial 9-7/10-6 years.

FFS people...teams quarterbacked by Matt Cassel and missing 4 of its best players are gonna lose some ugly games.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8096096)
The fraud is Matt Cassel.

Does he play defense?

O.city 11-09-2011 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096121)
Does he play defense?

No but our all pro safety who is out for the year does.

I think Berry is the biggest loss this year in terms of what it keeps us from doing.

CoMoChief 11-09-2011 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096121)
Does he play defense?

No but he's the leader of the 3 n out offense. An offensive scheme that specializes in giving opposing teams more possessions throughout a game.

A real game-changer I tell ya. Can't believe someone hasn't thought of that before.

milkman 11-09-2011 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096121)
Does he play defense?

Losing Berry, as O. pointed out is big.

And Crennel's bend but don't break scheme in a league with rules that favor offence so heavily is an outdated plan that is asking to be abused.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096167)
Losing Berry, as O. pointed out is big.

And Crennel's bend but don't break scheme in a league with rules that favor offence so heavily is an outdated plan that is asking to be abused.

Good point, Crennel is part of the problem, too.

BossChief 11-09-2011 09:53 PM

Notice in micd up that some of the players were talking about the scheme as being part of the problem on the defense against Miami.

Haley returns with something like "the scheme is not the problem"

O.city 11-09-2011 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096167)
Losing Berry, as O. pointed out is big.

And Crennel's bend but don't break scheme in a league with rules that favor offence so heavily is an outdated plan that is asking to be abused.

It was pointed out in a different thread, but losing Berry with teh shit we now have to put in the back 7 has greatly affected our defense on multiple levels.

Berry allowed Lewis to pretty much play center field all the time and move around more. With Berry back there it was alot easier to bring 5 or 6 on a blitz as he could get to places that McGraw or whoever can't get too.

O.city 11-09-2011 09:56 PM

If Clay were our GM we would have different coaches daily. I think coaching makes a difference but at some point, players have to be held accountable.

O.city 11-09-2011 09:58 PM

I would hate to see Clay if our organization was run like the Cowboys or the Faid. He'd be on the ledge all the time.

milkman 11-09-2011 09:59 PM

If your scheme and lack of talent in key areas lead to your defense to giving up points, you're going to get blown out if you have a liability at QB and you can't respond with points of your own.

Smed1065 11-09-2011 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096008)
When's the last time you actually went to a Chiefs game?

Without being scared.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8096204)
I would hate to see Clay if our organization was run like the Cowboys or the Faid. He'd be on the ledge all the time.

Less than bad does not equal good.

O.city 11-09-2011 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096210)
If your scheme and lack of talent in key areas lead to your defense to giving up points, you're going to get blown out if you have a liability at QB and you can't respond with points of your own.

This.


I think a playmaking safety has become the most important position on a defense. Maybe a close second to pass rusher. Berry just brings so much versatility to that spot. He can play like a 5th LB on 1 and 2 down and cover on 3, and he is athletic enough to make up for mistakes when he makes them.

O.city 11-09-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096216)
Less than bad does not equal good.

Very true.

Smed1065 11-09-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096216)
Less than bad does not equal good.

So U would do better?

lcarus 11-09-2011 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096210)
If your scheme and lack of talent in key areas lead to your defense to giving up points, you're going to get blown out if you have a liability at QB and you can't respond with points of your own.

On top of that, when you have a bad QB and an offense that can't generate first downs, 3 and out after 3 and out will cause even good defenses to break sometimes.

Bugeater 11-09-2011 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8096101)
yeah, except Haley never hired him as his DC...he was hired as a defensive coach with a title to be named later.

He was only named the DC once Romeo turned Pioli down for the job in 2009 because he wasn't healthy enough.

...

I think its laughable how some here seem to get a stiffy from talking about the Chiefs losing games over the course of rebuilding years by a greater margin than back in the perennial 9-7/10-6 years.

FFS people...teams quarterbacked by Matt Cassel and missing 4 of its best players are gonna lose some ugly games.

What 4 players were we missing in the 2010 blowouts?

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8096229)
What 4 players were we missing in the 2010 blowouts?

It doesn't matter. We were getting our asses kicked from the first snap this year with Berry on defense, and we were getting our asses kicked in Detroit before Charles got hurt.

milkman 11-09-2011 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8096229)
What 4 players were we missing in the 2010 blowouts?

Against Baltimore, I'd go with Dwayne Bowe.

milkman 11-09-2011 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096234)
It doesn't matter. We were getting our asses kicked from the first snap this year with Berry on defense, and we were getting our asses kicked in Detroit before Charles got hurt.

Really doesn't matter.

Unless you have the overall talent of the Ravens defense, or the Giants, teams are going to score points.

Look around the league.

Offenses are dominating.

If you can't score points, you're going to get your ass handed to you on occassion.

This isn't the old days when teams grabbed a lead, then protected it.

Bugeater 11-09-2011 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096237)
Against Baltimore, I'd go with Dwayne Bowe.

Bowe is 4 players?

milkman 11-09-2011 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8096263)
Bowe is 4 players?

Just a name to toss out there among the missing.

58kcfan89 11-09-2011 10:22 PM

It's fair that the injuries hurt us this year, but, as has been addressed here numerous times, if Pioli had used some of that cap space to sign a couple serviceable DBs and built some depth through free agency, we wouldn't be using them as such a crutch. I'm not saying that we could get a S to replace Berry's production, but surely we can do better than Piscitelli.

As for the blowouts, it's not all Cassel's fault by any means, but he's just as much of a constant as Haley & Pioli. If it's not obvious that we need a better QB, well....

Frankly, I'm not very happy with any of the 3 between the GM, HC & QB. I'm still holding out hope that they can get this figured out, but my faith slips with every 31-3 loss.

O.city 11-09-2011 10:23 PM

Clay is just wanting attention tonight, more than other nights for some reason. Those three injuries crippled this team.


Honestly was very surprising to me that they won the four they did.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8096295)
Clay is just wanting attention tonight, more than other nights for some reason. Those three injuries crippled this team.

I've been thinking about this post all week.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58kcfan89 (Post 8096287)
Frankly, I'm not very happy with any of the 3 between the GM, HC & QB. I'm still holding out hope that they can get this figured out, but my faith slips with every 31-3 loss.

Bingo.

How many does it take?

I suspect two more of these embarrassments and a lot of people are going to start looking for their pitchforks.

Bugeater 11-09-2011 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096325)
Bingo.

How many does it take?

I suspect two more of these embarrassments and a lot of people are going to start looking for their pitchforks.

Wait until we lose to Tebow...

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8096329)
Wait until we lose to Tebow...

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cbeR6uYxU50" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

58kcfan89 11-09-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8096295)
Clay is just wanting attention tonight, more than other nights for some reason. Those three injuries crippled this team.


Honestly was very surprising to me that they won the four they did.

Like I said, you're not going to find someone on the FA trail to replace Eric Berry and Jamaal Charles. But surely the Executive of the Decade can use all that cap space to find someone better than Sabby Piscitelli, Jackie Battle and Leonard Pope to back them up (I know a lot of people like Battle, but I'm not sold...).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096325)
Bingo.

How many does it take?

I suspect two more of these embarrassments and a lot of people are going to start looking for their pitchforks.

I'm probably going to keep holding out hope, because I want them to succeed, but if our QB depth chart still reads

QB1: Cassel
QB2: Stanzi
QB3: Palko

during Week 1 of 2012, I'm pretty much done. Like I said, QB's not the only problem, but it can cover a lot of problems, of which we have many. Pioli outta know that by now.

bricks 11-09-2011 10:40 PM

Casserole receives too much blame. Not to say he is not part of the problem but there are other problems as well. Outside of Hali, Chiefs have no pass rush. I'm convinced DJ will never be a great Linebacker. As much as people praise him he doesn't possess the instincts to be great. I'd like to see the defense a little more revamped by adding another pass rusher and another inside linebacker that could elevate this defense to another level.

milkman 11-09-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 8096340)
Casserole receives too much blame. Not to say he is not part of the problem but there are other problems as well. Outside of Hali, Chiefs have no pass rush. I'm convinced DJ will never be a great Linebacker. As much as people praise him he doesn't possess the instincts to be great. I'd like to see the defense a little more revamped by adding another pass rusher and another inside linebacker that could elevate this defense to another level.

Really?

This is the post you are going with?

Okie_Apparition 11-09-2011 10:47 PM

How do you build a team through the draft. If you don't give your drafties enough time to prove themselves? The first batch is just getting to year 3

58kcfan89 11-09-2011 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition (Post 8096354)
How do you build a team through the draft. If you don't give your drafties enough time to prove themselves? The first batch is just getting to year 3

Well, what's left of the first batch....

bricks 11-09-2011 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096347)
Really?

This is the post you are going with?

Well, if they are going to run a bend but don't break style of defense, then yeah I'd like too see another pass rusher brought in here.

Okie_Apparition 11-09-2011 10:53 PM

#3 overall is just starting to get it :)

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 11:17 PM

13 times in 40 games.

That's even worse than Herm. By my count his teams got dominated 10 times in 49 games.

Smed1065 11-09-2011 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8095941)
Yep, these guys have a penchant for getting dominated. Let's review:

2009

Ravens 38, Chiefs 24 - A "close game," but the Chiefs get outgained 501-188. Total domination by the Ravens.

Eagles 34, Chiefs 14 - Outgained 420-196. Cassel has a 124.5 QB rating, cus he's awesome.

Giants 27, Chiefs 16 - The Chiefs score two garbage time TDs that makes the score appear closer than it really was. 429-212.

Chargers 37, Chiefs 7 - Pitiful. 403-203.

Chargers 43, Chiefs 13 - Disgusting. 426-284.

Broncos 44, Chiefs 13 - Appalling. 413-222.


2010

Broncos 49, Chiefs 29 - Suddenly, smart fans realize Pioli and Haley are huge frauds.

Chargers 31, Chiefs 0 - 426-67. Brodie Croyle, you say? I say, look at the first game of 2009. No excuses for this.

Raiders 31, Chiefs 10 - 344-201

Ravens 30, Chiefs 7 - Hey, look! 32 games into the Pioli era and the Chiefs are still getting their asses kicked by the Baltimore Ravens! 390-161.


2011

Bills 41, Chiefs 7 - 364-213

Lions 48, Chiefs 3 - 411-267

Dolphins 31, Chiefs 3 - 351-343. I didn't even realize it was possible to match an opponent yard for yard and lose by 28 with NO TURNOVERS.


Summary:

Haley is 18-23 counting the 2010 Baltimore Ravens playoff scrimmage. In 13 of his 23 losses the team has been outright dominated. And THE MAJORITY of those blowouts have come in the last two years when the Chiefs were supposedly "getting better."

Seven of those losses have come at home, meaning that at least twice a year, Arrowhead Stadium season ticket holders can count on witnessing a complete embarrassment. That's 25% of their gameday experiences for the year. One quarter of the time, Haley and Pioli embarrass Arrowhead Stadium.

Future potential blowouts:

@ New England
Pittsburgh
@Chicago
@New York
Green Bay
Oakland

So I see started 2-14. U got a reason for this rhyme?

Iconic 11-09-2011 11:48 PM

Pioli is not the problem.

BigMeatballDave 11-09-2011 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 8096512)
Pioli is not the problem.

Who traded for Matt Cassel?

Hammock Parties 11-09-2011 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 8096512)
Pioli is not the problem.

Yeah, he only hired Haley and traded for Cassel.

Dave Lane 11-09-2011 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8096167)
Losing Berry, as O. pointed out is big.

And Crennel's bend but don't break scheme in a league with rules that favor offence so heavily is an outdated plan that is asking to be abused.

Bill Maas had an interesting take and he said it's from someone in the coaching staff, that with Berry out, McGraw out, Lewis dinged they are having to drop more players into coverage to mask a really bad pair of safeties and nickel back. Said plays where we did blitz the blitzers didn't get there and there were some huge plays off of those.

Right now there's two problems. Hali is our only pass rusher and and the secondary other than Flowers and Carr completely blows.

Dave Lane 11-09-2011 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096521)
Yeah, he only hired Haley and traded for Cassel.

So he's 1-2 pretty much what you would expect.

Iconic 11-09-2011 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096521)
Yeah, he only hired Haley and traded for Cassel.

I blame him only for hiring Haley. Who I have despised since day one because he's just not HC materiel. I believe Cassel was supposed to be the answer, but obviously hasn't turned out, and will now play the role as a stop gap QB. Pioli builds through the draft. In the next three years you will see Stanzi develop on the bench with Zorn and Pioli continue to draft players who will help him when he takes the field. Mark it down.

Caseyguyrr 11-09-2011 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 8096512)
Pioli is not the problem.

really?

Iconic 11-10-2011 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caseyguyrr (Post 8096538)
really?

Yes really... I've been a low key Dallas fan my entire life. I know what real shitty management feels like.

Hammock Parties 11-10-2011 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 8096528)
Bill Maas had an interesting take and he said it's from someone in the coaching staff, that with Berry out, McGraw out, Lewis dinged they are having to drop more players into coverage to mask a really bad pair of safeties and nickel back. Said plays where we did blitz the blitzers didn't get there and there were some huge plays off of those.

Right now there's two problems. Hali is our only pass rusher and and the secondary other than Flowers and Carr completely blows.

Guess who's fault that is?

Nightfyre 11-10-2011 12:14 AM

In further news, Gochiefs is a moron. This roster requires 14-17 more players and most importantly a new QB. You CANNOT overhaul a roster in 2.10 seasons.

Hammock Parties 11-10-2011 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8096562)
In further news, Gochiefs is a moron. This roster requires 14-17 more players and most importantly a new QB. You CANNOT overhaul a roster in 2.10 seasons.

Pioli has had three offseasons. Three drafts. And we are still getting our asses kicked. AT HOME.

Nightfyre 11-10-2011 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096565)
Pioli has had three offseasons. Three drafts. And we are still getting our asses kicked. AT HOME.

You just don't get it, do you? He practically had to flush 45 players off this roster. You can't do that in a 2 drafts plus (whatever the hell you want to call 2009) and three super weak free agency periods. He can't miracle players into existence.

Further, he hasn't had time to develop his new crop. His 2009 class should just be coming into their own.

Lastly, YOU ARE A HACK.

Hammock Parties 11-10-2011 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8096569)
You just don't get it, do you? He practically had to flush 45 players off this roster. You can't do that in a 2 drafts plus (whatever the hell you want to call 2009) and three super weak free agency periods.

http://i42.tinypic.com/x21o4l.jpg

58kcfan89 11-10-2011 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096565)
Pioli has had three offseasons. Three drafts. And we are still getting our asses kicked. AT HOME.

By the formerly 0-7 Dolphins.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8096562)
In further news, Gochiefs is a moron. This roster requires 14-17 more players and most importantly a new QB. You CANNOT overhaul a roster in 2.10 seasons.

And Pioli acquired said QB and passed on upgrading the depth through free agency. I don't want his head on a pike like GC seems to, but I definitely see some problems here... Pioli's got time to get my trust back, but I don't know why he thought that Piscitelli would be a good addition in any sense of the word.

Nightfyre 11-10-2011 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096576)

Yea, why didn't we trade the Herschel Walker pick?

Iconic 11-10-2011 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096576)

Matt Cassel and Jamaal Charles couldn't even lick Aikman and Emitt's jock strap. Not a very fair comparison.

Edit: Same goes for Bowe and Irwin.

Hammock Parties 11-10-2011 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 8096583)
Matt Cassel and Jamaal Charles couldn't even lick Aikman and Emitt's jock strap. Not a very fair comparison.

Edit: Same goes for Bowe and Irwin.

The intent is to show you can go from 1-15 to upper-echelon team in a short span.

Pioli and Haley have had plenty of time.

They suck.

Nightfyre 11-10-2011 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096613)
The intent is to show you can go from 1-15 to upper-echelon team in a short span.

Pioli and Haley have had plenty of time.

They suck.

No you suck. You can't ignore the Herschel Walker deal in the 1989 Dallas Cowboys turnaround. You would give up on rebuilding the roster and the culture of KC when it is 70% complete?

Well guys, the empire state building is taking too long to build, let's knock it down and start over. ****ing ridiculous.

Hammock Parties 11-10-2011 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8096620)
No you suck. You can't ignore the Herschel Walker deal in the 1989 Dallas Cowboys turnaround.

There are plenty of other examples.

Getting their ass handed to them three times in eight games after three offseasons is positively dreadful. They have had enough time that this shit should not be happening. We look as bad as we did the year they got here.

Iconic 11-10-2011 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096613)
The intent is to show you can go from 1-15 to upper-echelon team in a short span.

Pioli and Haley have had plenty of time.

They suck.

Yes, you can go from 1-15 to the Superbowl. All you need is three future HOFamers and a incompetent franchise to trade with. A lot of factors play into how quickly a franchise becomes king shit. How strong have the past 4 FA's been? How about the draft classes? How bad was the team when Pioli received it and how many players from the 09 season are still with us? How about the Lockout? Does it change how a young team like us may play? Lingering injuries in key positions? Too many variables here to compare our franchise to the 90s Cowboys.

It should be noted we made the playoffs last season. Regardless of how... It's a form of success.

Smed1065 11-10-2011 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 8096528)
Bill Maas had an interesting take and he said it's from someone in the coaching staff, that with Berry out, McGraw out, Lewis dinged they are having to drop more players into coverage to mask a really bad pair of safeties and nickel back. Said plays where we did blitz the blitzers didn't get there and there were some huge plays off of those.

Right now there's two problems. Hali is our only pass rusher and and the secondary other than Flowers and Carr completely blows.

So QB is good to go? Oh a lineman.

Smed1065 11-10-2011 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096641)
There are plenty of other examples.

Getting their ass handed to them three times in eight games after three offseasons is positively dreadful. They have had enough time that this shit should not be happening. We look as bad as we did the year they got here.

Yeah, guess it gives you a reason for existence. :doh!:

007 11-10-2011 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8096329)
Wait until we lose to Tebow...

That is what I am scared to death of. I'll want to shoot all three of them if that happens.

007 11-10-2011 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 8096512)
Pioli is not the problem.

WTF How do you figure that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096521)
Yeah, he only traded for Cassel and hired Haley.

flipped it for you

Hammock Parties 11-10-2011 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 8096647)

It should be noted we made the playoffs last season. Regardless of how... It's a form of success.

The 2008 Dolphins say hi.

BossChief 11-10-2011 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8096229)
What 4 players were we missing in the 2010 blowouts?

QB
RT
NT
WR2
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096234)
and we were getting our asses kicked in Detroit before Charles got hurt.

completely false.

C'mon man.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition (Post 8096354)
How do you build a team through the draft. If you don't give your drafties enough time to prove themselves? The first batch is just getting to year 3

:clap:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8096641)
There are plenty of other examples.

Getting their ass handed to them three times in eight games after three offseasons is positively dreadful. They have had enough time that this shit should not be happening. We look as bad as we did the year they got here.

1 of those offseasons was cut short due to the late hiring of staff and personnel and another was cut short due to a lockout. The last two offseasons have been pretty damn good.

"balla ass GM"

We look as bad as when he took over?

Really?

We won 2 games the previous year and broke records for futility.

At the halfway point, even with 3 blowout losses, we are still leading our division at the midway point.

With Cassel and missing Moeaki, Charles and Berry.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.