ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs CP grades the Chiefs' draft (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259030)

mlyonsd 04-28-2012 05:19 PM

CP grades the Chiefs' draft
 
Poll forthcoming.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-28-2012 05:19 PM

F...they didn't select one guy off my big board. Had all da picks graded out a round later than they took em. derp

L.A. Chieffan 04-28-2012 05:20 PM

Fs across the board. A barrel full of jizz could've gone a better job

MIAdragon 04-28-2012 05:20 PM

Nothing sexy, I just hope we get some solid players out of it.

Frosty 04-28-2012 05:21 PM

B-

Phobia 04-28-2012 05:21 PM

I will come grade this draft in 3 years just like I always do...

Pasta Little Brioni 04-28-2012 05:21 PM

Seriously though it was a solid draft that potentially filled a few holes and added solid depth.

Direckshun 04-28-2012 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 8579128)
I will come grade this draft in 3 years just like I always do...

Which reminds me. It's about time to grade the 2009 class.

:facepalm:

AustinChief 04-28-2012 05:22 PM

Solid B with potential to move to an A- or a C-... but straight up B as of right now.

jd1020 04-28-2012 05:24 PM

Nothing sexy about the draft but I could get behind every pick minus the Jerome Long pick.

qabbaan 04-28-2012 05:24 PM

B

HemiEd 04-28-2012 05:24 PM

c+ that could end up being an A

boogblaster 04-28-2012 05:25 PM

B- ... hope some can help quick ...

whoman69 04-28-2012 05:25 PM

B-

I think they became fixated on certain positions where we don't really have a need. I can see the possibility that 3 people in the draft don't even make the 53. We did a poor job in building depth at TE and safety which were huge concerns going into the draft.

Red Dawg 04-28-2012 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8579130)
Seriously though it was a solid draft that potentially filled a few holes and added solid depth.

I agree. We need depth not instant starters. All positions have thier starters in place and we are young for a change. I will say that Lewis may be in trouble because the Bama kid can flat out play. Tucker and Cooper may be in trouble as well. That white kid can flat out fly and I love Hemingway. Brady is killing teams with two guys just like that kid.

Direckshun 04-28-2012 05:26 PM

This draft did virtually everything it needed to do, with that said.

We got a starting nose, the best this draft had to offer. Guys like Chapman and Ta'amu may have offered better value, but we escaped this draft with the best nose on the table.

We shored up the starting line for years with Allen, and Stephenson is a fascinating risk that (a.) offers us depth at the least, and (b.) gives us the immense upside of a potential left tackle.

They lost me with Wylie and Menzie, but they regained me with a strong closing trio of Gray, Long, and Hemingway. Gray is the jack-of-all-trades guy you need to succeed, Hemingway is solid WR depth, and Long is the kind of small program gamble you take. 70 tackles with 5 sacks is crazy from the 2- and 3-tech position, which is where he played last year with SDSU.

The midrounds really bummed me out, and my cooler head prevailed with the first three. The last three were very good selections.

I give it a C+ for now, but in three years I can see this being something crazy like an A+ if Poe and Stephenson hit their ceilings and we actually find something for Wylie to do.

ShortRoundChief 04-28-2012 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8579123)
Fs across the board. A barrel full of jizz could've gone a better job

There you have it. A solid analysis from a guy who definitely values his barrel full of jizz.

Reaper16 04-28-2012 05:29 PM

C+/B-. It's pretty solid all around apart from Poe.

qabbaan 04-28-2012 05:30 PM

B.

I like that we took two effective college tackles, so on the offseason we should have at least two new starters on the line. One of those guys will be our guard.

Poe is high risk high reward, but with two more DTs taken right after him, seems we were in the right spot.

Overall, it may not be exciting from a skill position standpoint, and I wish we had taken a flyer on a QB instead of a returner, but it looks like a list of guys who will contribute.

ShortRoundChief 04-28-2012 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 8579151)
This draft did virtually everything it needed to do, with that said.

We got a starting nose, the best this draft had to offer. Guys like Chapman and Ta'amu may have offered better value, but we escaped this draft with the best nose on the table.

We shored up the starting line for years with Allen, and Stephenson is a fascinating risk that (a.) offers us depth at the least, and (b.) gives us the immense upside of a potential left tackle.

They lost me with Wylie and Menzie, but they regained me with a strong closing trio of Gray, Long, and Hemingway. Gray is the jack-of-all-trades guy you need to succeed, Hemingway is solid WR depth, and Long is the kind of small program gamble you take. 70 tackles with 5 sacks is crazy from the 2- and 3-tech position, which is where he played last year with SDSU.

The midrounds really bummed me out, and my cooler head prevailed with the first three. The last three were very good selections.

I give it a C+ for now, but in three years I can see this being something crazy like an A+ if Poe and Stephenson hit their ceilings and we actually find something for Wylie to do.

Personally I think the Poe pick is a product of the new CBA/rookie scale. Despite not having the stats in college the guy has the potential to be a monster, one of a kind player. I don't think we make that pick if the financials would be out of wack. We'd have made a safer pick, probably DeCastro.

That being said they took a huge risk on a player that has a gigantic ceiling, rather than going safe.

I could live with that.

Deberg_1990 04-28-2012 05:33 PM

A+ Pioli is true genius
Posted via Mobile Device

qabbaan 04-28-2012 05:33 PM

Look at the vote distribution.

From the bitchfest threads you'd think F would win in a landslide... Guess its just a vocal few.

WhitiE 04-28-2012 05:37 PM

A solid B in my mind, but wtf do I know?

Predarat 04-28-2012 05:37 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rLwADyVdVK8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

DTLB58 04-28-2012 05:39 PM

B

Beside Poe every thing else is and needed to be about depth.

The OL picks weren't sexy and got everyone down early but the positions were a MUST.

If they would have traded down and picked up a few extra picks and got a ILB or pass rusher would have given them an A for sure.

wazu 04-28-2012 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 8579128)
I will come grade this draft in 3 years just like I always do...

Cool. When you do you can also tell us who won the next 3 Superbowls.

StanziCityChiefs 04-28-2012 05:41 PM

B-/B dont really know about Poe yet but Im excited to see how he turns out. The two OL are good picks and will help Charles and put Cassel in the best position to win now. Wylie was a little odd and the safety is basically a depth pick, but anything is better than Jersey Shore. Gray and Hemmingway made me very happy.

BossChief 04-28-2012 05:42 PM

We still need a couple linebackers, but I like how we filled the other needs.

I think we all get a little trapped into the game of liking our crop of players we see as good fits for this team and therefore dislike the fact the team passes on our guys to take someone else, but I like the guys we drafted.

We took projects at positions we have solid coaching at (which should lessen the bust factor) and took some other guys that should make an impact fairly quickly at positions of need.

O.city 04-28-2012 05:43 PM

Not any flashy picks, which will get this draft graded pretty low.


But it's really what we needed at this point. There were a few picks that I thought could and should have went other ways, but the guys that I wanted at that pick fell even further so obviously something was wrong with them.

Gadzooks 04-28-2012 05:44 PM

Why is A+++ not an option... Poll fail.

Mecca 04-28-2012 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8579148)
B-

I think they became fixated on certain positions where we don't really have a need. I can see the possibility that 3 people in the draft don't even make the 53. We did a poor job in building depth at TE and safety which were huge concerns going into the draft.

This was the worst TE/Safety draft in forever, those were the thinnest positions.

TimeForWasp 04-28-2012 05:46 PM

Good draft. Best in the West.

philfree 04-28-2012 05:46 PM

I gave it a A-. We addressed our biggest need at NT (yeah Cassel I know) by picking the highest ceiling prospect on the board in Poe. He might bust but if we're grading today then it's a great pick.

We also addressed the O line which was a designated upgrade by Pioli and Co. We landed a guy who can start immediately at G and play both Tackle spots and we also landed a LOT of the future.

We addressed the much needed depth at S as well as RB.

All that spells pretty good draft to me. It's silly to grade it today though. We probably ought to give it a little more time.

the Talking Can 04-28-2012 05:46 PM

C+ with B+ upside entirely dependent on poe

nothing really exciting...some solid mid-to-late round picks, hit all our needs except QB

not one automatic day 1 starter in the whole bunch

consensus on Allen is he'll be a starter sooner than later, good pick
Stephensen is a developmental tackle...no clue if he is worth the pick
Wylie is the second fatest WR at combine, we needed speed and got it..credit for that even though he's probably nothing
Menzie comes from best 3-4 defense in college, and from a stud secondary...surprise pick but i like
Gray is excellent value in the 6th, imo...this pick made me happy
Long is 3-4 DE who made a lot of tackles, high motor...7th round, what do you want?
Hemingway...flyer on skill player, played big time football...like it

poe is a risk and a project...if he doesn't become wilfork that pick should cost pioli his job

Cassel is still our QB and no one else on the roster is worth a nickle..we'll go into year 5 with Cassel still as our QB, that is so insane there are no words

BossChief 04-28-2012 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qabbaan (Post 8579165)
Look at the vote distribution.

From the bitchfest threads you'd think F would win in a landslide... Guess its just a vocal few.

Most of the people crying about this draft need to get over themselves.

So what if they didn't take the guys you wanted them to take....none of us have 10% of the information front offices have about these kids.

kysirsoze 04-28-2012 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8579202)
C+ with B+ upside entirely dependent on poe

nothing really exciting...some solid mid-to-late round picks, hit all our needs except QB

not one automatic day 1 starter in the whole bunch

consensus on Allen is he'll be a starter sooner than later, good pick
Stephensen is a developmental tackle...no clue if he is worth the pick
Wylie is the second fatest WR at combine, we needed speed and got it..credit for that even though he's probably nothing
Menzie comes from best 3-4 defense in college, and from a stud secondary...surprise pick but i like
Gray is excellent value in the 6th, imo...this pick made me happy
Long is 3-4 DE who made a lot of tackles, high motor...7th round, what do you want?
Hemingway...flyer on skill player, played big time football...like it

poe is a risk and a project...if he doesn't become wilfork that pick should cost pioli his job

Cassel is still our QB and no one else on the roster is worth a nickle..we'll go into year 5 with Cassel still as our QB, that is so insane there are no words

All of this. Only difference is I ended up with a more optomistic B, hoping that with some good coaching Poe is going to be great.

Coogs 04-28-2012 05:55 PM

I gave it a solid B for right now. It wasn't a sexy draft, but if the players we seclected pan out... look out!

Fairplay 04-28-2012 06:01 PM

I gave it a B. Seems do be the consensus of the posters.

O.city 04-28-2012 06:05 PM

I look at it this way.



If this draft pans out how they hope it will, which it could or it couldn't don't know yet, our only hole left to fill is the quarterback.


You can trade away picks Redskins style next year and go get the guy you want.

Easy 6 04-28-2012 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8579148)
B-

I think they became fixated on certain positions where we don't really have a need. I can see the possibility that 3 people in the draft don't even make the 53. We did a poor job in building depth at TE and safety which were huge concerns going into the draft.

I'll go flat B, yes te isnt deep, but theres plenty enough receiver & back talent right now to work around that if need be.

Heck, the way Baldwins getting all swoll, he could fill in as a receiving te if called upon.

AustinChief 04-28-2012 06:10 PM

People are going to hate this comparison... but picks like these are what made the Patriots great. Solid, contributors and depth... with one possible game changer/boom/bust type of pick.

We are not just a QB away from being all-world Superbowl bound... but we are only a QB away from being a legit team for the first time in a long time.

Chiefshrink 04-28-2012 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 8579151)

They lost me with Wylie and Menzie, but they regained me with a strong closing trio of Gray, Long, and Hemingway. Gray is the jack-of-all-trades guy you need to succeed, Hemingway is solid WR depth, and Long is the kind of small program gamble you take. 70 tackles with 5 sacks is crazy from the 2- and 3-tech position, which is where he played last year with SDSU.

The midrounds really bummed me out, and my cooler head prevailed with the first three. The last three were very good selections.

I give it a C+ for now, but in three years I can see this being something crazy like an A+ if Poe and Stephenson hit their ceilings and we actually find something for Wylie to do.

You are wrong about Wylie:thumb:

KCDC 04-28-2012 06:19 PM

I gave it an average grade -- C. Of course, with grade inflation in schools, I think average grade is now B+.

Pioli executed no smart trades. He let everyone trade up in front of us to take the guys we wanted. Our draft board was obvious. Granted the board fell wrong to us, he could have traded back in the 2nd or 3rd and received a few more picks. He needed a better Safety. We ignored a couple of good TEs that slipped. There are no good Safety free agents. Otagwe is basically Pollard. So, we will be hurting there. Menzie might convert, but we have a poor track record of converting CBs to safeties, and vice versa.

Poe is the key to this draft. If he busts, this is a D draft. If he becomes a monster, this becomes an A- draft. If he is just "solid" then it stays a C.

I'd have liked a QB. Maybe as a free agent we can sign some safety and QB, but we should have used a 7th to get B.J. Coleman. It would have been a better signal to Cassel that his days are numbered. The Pack scout good late round QBs. We ignore them. So much for the statement that we take a QB each draft. Pioli better sign Moore as a FA. He won't be a star in this league but at least TRY to find a QB for God's sake.

Chiefshrink 04-28-2012 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 8579259)
People are going to hate this comparison... but picks like these are what made the Patriots great. Solid, contributors and depth... with one possible game changer/boom/bust type of pick.

We are not just a QB away from being all-world Superbowl bound... but we are only a QB away from being a legit team for the first time in a long time.

Agreed.

The Dawg 04-28-2012 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 8579128)
I will come grade this draft in 3 years just like I always do...

Exactly. Truth is nobody knows how this draft class will turn out right now.

TimeForWasp 04-28-2012 06:21 PM

I love the way the went about this draft. NOTHING wrong with this draft.

KCDC 04-28-2012 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 8579259)
People are going to hate this comparison... but picks like these are what made the Patriots great. Solid, contributors and depth... with one possible game changer/boom/bust type of pick.

We are not just a QB away from being all-world Superbowl bound... but we are only a QB away from being a legit team for the first time in a long time.

What made the Patriots great was Tom Brady.

the Talking Can 04-28-2012 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD369 (Post 8579289)
Exactly. Truth is nobody knows how this draft class will turn out right now.

that's really profound....we all thought we could see the future

the Talking Can 04-28-2012 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCDC (Post 8579294)
What made the Patriots great was Tom Brady.

wrong...it was danny woodhead, value pick

veist 04-28-2012 06:29 PM

Poe is totally a planet theory guy, its a risk but you aren't going to see a big man that moves like that very often at all.

The Dawg 04-28-2012 06:32 PM

What do the "experts" have to say about our draft?

Gadzooks 04-28-2012 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 8579321)
Poe is totally a planet theory guy, its a risk but you aren't going to see a big man that moves like that very often at all.

If he took plays off in Memphis, what makes you think he'll rev the motor up in KC?
Guys like him stop moving once they've signed their first contract.

Easy 6 04-28-2012 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 8579370)
If he took plays off in Memphis, what makes you think he'll rev the motor up in KC?
Guys like him stop moving once they've signed their first contract.

:hmmm: i see what you're up to in your last few posts... maybe we should turn our critical collective eye upon the dolts draft...

Ming the Merciless 04-28-2012 06:59 PM

I'll say B+ but of course much depends on how Poe turns out. I'd rate lower if I knew enough to think he was probably going to bust though. I don't know enough about him to have an educated opinion so I'll have to put my faith in the FO and hope they hit their gamble.

Just the fact it is a very large gamble gets a big deduction though, a safer pick at 1 wouldve been preferable to me (i'm chicken?).

scho63 04-28-2012 06:59 PM

I can give them a B for filling up our needs and doing nothing too crazy or too safe while building nice depth. The big question mark of course is which way Poe will break. If he becomes a superstar the draft moves to an A and if he flounders we move down to a D because that will be 3 out of last 4 drafts where a high first round defense selection fails to make a big impact IMHO

veist 04-28-2012 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 8579370)
If he took plays off in Memphis, what makes you think he'll rev the motor up in KC?
Guys like him stop moving once they've signed their first contract.

Memphis' coaching staff was incompetent lets not damn the guy before he's played a down in the league just because he played on a terrible team with a terrible coaching staff. It may be a reach, he might be a bust but its pretty clearly a planet theory driven pick.

keg in kc 04-28-2012 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 8579128)
I will come grade this draft in 3 years just like I always do...

That's my philosophy.

If you twist my arm, right now I'd say it's in the B to B- range. No really sexy picks, but I think the roster was set aside from QB and DT. They got the DT, and I didn't want a QB from this class, so it works for me. I like picks for depth that could all become starters down the road.

But it really comes down to Poe and the two linemen on day 2. If he becomes the centerpiece of the line, it's an A draft and anything else is a cherry on top. If he doesn't...

But we won't be able to make any kind of early judgement on him for a full year, or a fair judgement for 2-3.

Urc Burry 04-28-2012 07:40 PM

Poe didn't have motor problems at Memphis. He just played every single down, and had no feel for the game or technique. That is where Romeo comes in

RJ 04-28-2012 08:03 PM

What letter grade would you use for "boring"?

hometeam 04-28-2012 08:12 PM

Im on the 'we could have gotten all our picks 1 round later' train

Chiefnj2 04-28-2012 08:16 PM

It might be the most underwhelming and unexciting draft in KC history. The first rounder with the lowest floor and a bunch of questionable depth.

Iowanian 04-28-2012 08:24 PM

Compared to the needs of the team, I think it was a fine draft. They didn't take everyone I wanted, but most of the picks made sense to me.

Poe is huge, has physical tools and they obviously see something in him, I'm hoping he's a Ngata or Wilfork type player. A starting left guard, a swing tackle and potential LT, corner depth, nice complimentary running back, wide receiver help.

All things the Chiefs needed.

The only true gaping hole I see on this team right now is safety depth.(obviously QB isn't a strength, but you can't fix it all in 1 year).

Chiefnj2 04-28-2012 08:24 PM

They drafted 1 player in Mayock's top 100.

shammus 04-28-2012 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8579757)
They drafted 1 player in Mayock's top 100.

Looks like we have 4 in Mayocks top 100. Poe at 13, Allen at 36, Menzie at 80 and Stephenson at 96
http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000...spect-rankings

Chiefnj2 04-28-2012 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shammus (Post 8579764)
Looks like we have 4 in Mayocks top 100. Poe at 13, Allen at 36, Menzie at 80 and Stephenson at 96
http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000...spect-rankings

That's what I get for reading the list in under 10 seconds. My bad. I especially didn't realize Allen was rated so high.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-28-2012 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 8579718)
Im on the 'we could have gotten all our picks 1 round later' train

Dumb

Okie_Apparition 04-28-2012 08:43 PM

We won't know until New Year's Day
if the Christmas presents will hold up
and hold our interest more than the box they came in

Beef Supreme 04-28-2012 08:54 PM

Poe makes or breaks this draft. I hope all the people doubting him pisses him off enough to make him a beast.

Allen is Lilja's replacement, it's just a matter of when. But he'll get play time this year no matter what.

Stephenson is good depth with good feet and good measureables. I think he'll make the roster.

The rest can plan on trying to find a roster spot on special teams. Could be a diamond in there somewhere.

milkman 04-28-2012 08:58 PM

I think Jeff Allen will be the starter at LG, sooner than later.

I have my doubts about Stephnson, but he has potential.

I really like the potential of Menzie at safety and Gray at RB.

But this draft rides on Poe.

I am skeptical, at best, but time will tell.

shammus 04-28-2012 09:03 PM

I give it a C+. I didn't mind the positions we drafted at all. Those were all necessary. I didn't even really mind that we seemingly went with a large group of "projects" in this draft. What I didn't like was that it seemed like every time we drafted someone, there were at least two guys rated higher at that same position still available. So in other words, a few of our guys were reaches. I also would have liked to have seen us trade down in the first round. I think we could have taken that offer from the Eagles, still snagged Poe and picked up some extra picks in the process.

Poe - I'm willing to at least partially buy into his low statistics stemming from him being on a bad team, with bad coaching. Plus, all he's really supposed to do is take up space and occupy blockers so it's not like he's supposed to be racking up a bunch of tackles for loss and sacks anyway. He's got a lot of strength, speed, upside and supposedly a solid motor/work ethic. B-

Allen - Would have really loved for us to have taken Konz here who slipped a lot further than people thought he'd go. Could have moved Hudson to guard. Osemele was available too. Would have preferred either to Allen, but I do like Allen's versatility. - C

Stephenson - At this point in the draft I was almost convinced that our "theme" for this year was "project players". We are woefully thin at tackle but it seems that Zebrie Sanders or Bobby Massie would have been a better selection at this spot? I do like his potential to be a decent LT in the future though. - C

Wylie - again, there were several players at this position I would have rather had - Marvin Jones, McNutt, etc... Seems to be a big injury risk as well. Not sure what the thinking was on this one but I THINK I read that he was the 2nd fastest WR in the draft??? I like the pick a bit better if that is the case as we don't have a true stretch the field, deep threat. 5'9 is still a bit small though... - C-

Menzie - really wanted Iloka here but the Menzie selection is where I started liking our picks a little more. Anything that keeps McGraw and Sabby off the field though is fine by me - B

Gray - Really liked this pick. Best RB left on the board too and has a good skillset - running, blocking, catching out of the backfield, etc... Seems like a well rounded back that was expected to go in RD 3-4. You might say this is our first value pick as well - A

Long - I think David Molk could have been our starter at C if we had taken him here and he'd be perfect for our zone blocking scheme. I don't know much about Long other than he had some impressive stats playing at a small school. After a few "meh" picks in the draft, I guess Pioli was due for a true wtf pick. Cam Johnson slid a looong way in this draft. Would have loved to have seen him or Molk taken with our #218 pick... C-

Hemingway - After Gray, this is probably my favorite pick. Seems to have a pretty well-rounded skillset and has a shot at being our WR4 - A

O.city 04-28-2012 09:03 PM

We got some really good pieces, IMO, later in the draft. Possibly a starting LG, a good swing tackle prospect, running back depth, wr depth, dline depth.


But as has been said, this is all on Poe. If he plays like a bad ass up front, this is a top 5 defense with athleticism everywhere behind. If he plays like a JAG, it's a shitty draft.

O.city 04-28-2012 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shammus (Post 8579840)
I give it a C+. I didn't mind the positions we drafted at all. Those were all necessary. I didn't even really mind that we seemingly went with a large group of "projects" in this draft. What I didn't like was that it seemed like every time we drafted someone, there were at least two guys rated higher at that same position still available. So in other words, a few of our guys were reaches. I also would have liked to have seen us trade down in the first round. I think we still could have snagged Poe and we could have picked up some extra picks.

Poe - I'm willing to at least partially buy into his low statistics stemming from him being on a bad team, with bad coaching. Plus, all he's really supposed to do is take up space and occupy blockers so it's not like he's supposed to be racking up a bunch of tackles for loss and sacks anyway. He's got a lot of strength, speed, upside and supposedly a solid motor/work ethic. B-

Allen - Would have really loved for us to have taken Konz here who slipped a lot further than people thought he'd go. Could have moved Hudson to guard. Osemele was available too. Would have preferred either to Allen, but I do like Allen's versatility. - C

Stephenson - At this point in the draft I was almost convinced that our "theme" for this year was "project players". We are woefully thin at tackle but it seems that Zebrie Sanders or Bobby Massie would have been a better selection at this spot? I do like his potential to be a decent LT in the future though. - C

Wylie - again, there were several players at this position I would have rather had - Marvin Jones, McNutt, etc... Seems to be a big injury risk as well. Not sure what the thinking was on this one but I THINK I read that he was the 2nd fastest WR in the draft??? I like the pick a bit better if that is the case as we don't have a true stretch the field, deep threat. 5'9 is still a bit small though... - C-

Menzie - really wanted Iloka here but the Menzie selection is where I started liking our picks a little more. Anything that keeps McGraw and Sabby off the field though is fine by me - B

Gray - Really liked this pick. Best RB left on the board too and has a good skillset - running, blocking, catching out of the backfield, etc... Seems like a well rounded back that was expected to go in RD 3-4. You might say this is our first value pick as well - A

Long - I think David Molk could have been our starter at C if we had taken him here and he'd be perfect for our zone blocking scheme. I don't know much about Long other than he had some impressive stats playing at a small school. After a few "meh" picks in the draft, I guess Pioli was due for a true wtf pick. Cam Johnson slid a looong way in this draft. Would have loved to have seen him or Molk taken with our #218 pick... C-

Hemingway - After Gray, this is probably my favorite pick. Seems to have a pretty well-rounded skillset and has a shot at being our WR4 - A

The thing you have to look at is, yeah, some of those guys were rated higher when we picked. But they also fell a long way. So it wasn't just the Chiefs that were passing on them.

Those ratings were mostly by guys that work for the networks, IIRC.

BoneKrusher 04-28-2012 09:11 PM

C+
i understand we needed depth but we also need a QB.

FloridaMan88 04-28-2012 09:22 PM

D-, a terrible draft by Fat Scott.

The Chiefs talked about "bringing in competition" for Cassel this offseason... unless Brady Quinn magically transforms into an NFL caliber QB (something he hasn't shown an ability to do in his 5 year NFL career thus far), the Chiefs have failed to upgrade the competition at QB.

The Chiefs reached badly to fill a need with Poe, who appears to be another Junior Siavii.

chiefzilla1501 04-28-2012 09:26 PM

Pretty unsexy draft. But there's some things to like. I think it's a B today, but it could become a C or an A depending on Poe.

Poe was a nice draft pick because it showed Pioli is ready to take a risk on an impact player rather than layup on the safe guy. Let's hope that happens at QB soon enough. Again, I think the Chiefs see several areas of improvement for the guy: 1) no reason to play him 50+ snaps. That's just insane. 2) let him focus on playing one position well instead of moving him around. 3) Hook him up with the martial arts guy. His hand technique is horrendous and it's getting him completely locked up. 4) Hook him up with Romeo, one of the best D-line coaches in the game. Teach him to get his pads down. He gets his pads too high and he gets stood up. The position is all about leverage and he loses that game as soon as the ball is snapped.

Allen--nice pick, even if he's just quality depth. I mentioned before that our o-line is rounding out, but our depth was absolutely horrendous. I think Stephenson is a much better pick than a guy like Mike Adams, who went earlier. Stephenson actually has fast enough feet to play the position -- at worst, he's okay depth. The rest of the draft is a crapshoot, but we may have gotten 1 or 2 starters out of it and quality depth at some key positions. I did think the focus on WRs was a little weird.

At this stage of the Chiefs, it's good that they got deeper, which is what they needed. Let's just hope that somehow magically our QB situation will be fixed sometime in the next 20 years.

Okie_Apparition 04-28-2012 09:26 PM

unless you think Quinn is less a QB than Cassel
he is competition
Please don't forget to register for the November elections

Easy 6 04-28-2012 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shammus (Post 8579840)
Allen - Would have really loved for us to have taken Konz here who slipped a lot further than people thought he'd go. Could have moved Hudson to guard. Osemele was available too. Would have preferred either to Allen, but I do like Allen's versatility. - C

Stephenson - At this point in the draft I was almost convinced that our "theme" for this year was "project players". We are woefully thin at tackle but it seems that Zebrie Sanders or Bobby Massie would have been a better selection at this spot? I do like his potential to be a decent LT in the future though. - C

These two players might end up being the real meat of this draft a few years down the road.

Winning the battle up front shouldnt seem boring, its thinking ahead.

*cue the music*

FloridaMan88 04-28-2012 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 8579908)
These two players might end up being the real meat of this draft a few years down the road.

Winning the battle up front shouldnt seem boring, its thinking ahead.

*cue the music*

DeCastro would have helped greatly with "winning the battle up front".

FloridaMan88 04-28-2012 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition (Post 8579905)
unless you think Quinn is less a QB than Cassel
he is competition
Please don't forget to register for the November elections

Cassel is more accomplished than Quinn... the Chiefs managed to find one of the few veteran NFL QB's who can be described as less accomplished than Cassel.

Okie_Apparition 04-28-2012 09:36 PM

The cost of moving Obama out & Romney in
is enough of a reason to stay the status quo


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.