ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Expectations for Fisher (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272509)

O.city 04-26-2013 09:49 AM

Expectations for Fisher
 
So, we took the best LT available in the entire draft. Looks to be a good pick.


What are the expectations for him, year 1? By year 2? Year 5?

Depending on what they do with Albert will make a difference, but assuming they trade Albert.

RunKC 04-26-2013 09:51 AM

Pro bowl player for several years.

Love it that he said his goal this year was to be a rookie in the pro bowl.

Halfcan 04-26-2013 09:52 AM

Pro Bowler, Chiefs Ring of Fame and eventually HOF. Can't wait to see this guy destroy defenses.

NorthernWV 04-26-2013 09:52 AM

He's obviously the piece that the Chiefs needed for a Super Bowl run

KC_Lee 04-26-2013 09:52 AM

All Pro by his second year, franchise tagged once his first contract is up, traded after tagged.

Halfcan 04-26-2013 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9630890)
Pro bowl player for several years.

Love it that he said his goal this year was to be a rookie in the pro bowl.

:thumb:

Dave Lane 04-26-2013 09:53 AM

He better be a HOF player to justify the pick. Lane Johnson will end up being a better tackle in my opinion and I think Jeckel will likely bust.

O.city 04-26-2013 09:53 AM

I expect him to be an instant upgrade to Albert at LT, a top 10 LT day 1, and an all pro by year 2 or 3.

Dave Lane 04-26-2013 09:54 AM

May have been the worst 1.1 pick in 5-6 years.

Sorter 04-26-2013 09:54 AM

Significantly better than Matt Kalil was last year.

Dave Lane 04-26-2013 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630908)
I expect him to be an instant upgrade to Albert at LT, a top 10 LT day 1, and an all pro by year 2 or 3.

You think he is that good or that is your expectation given where the pick occurred?

mnchiefsguy 04-26-2013 09:54 AM

Best LT in football. Better than Joekl, better than Johnson. He better be a ****ing stud.

philfree 04-26-2013 09:55 AM

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7UtsHILCWC...760/atlas3.jpg

O.city 04-26-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9630913)
You think he is that good or that is your expectation given where the pick occurred?

Little bit of both.


Based on what the FO is telling us about the guy, expectations should be high. Combined with where he was picked, I don't think thats a stretch at all.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 09:56 AM

My expectations are that he'll be fine but nothing mind-blowing. He won't be Jordan Black, but he won't be Jonathan Ogden, either.

Fat Elvis 04-26-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9630893)
Pro Bowler, Chiefs Ring of Fame and eventually HOF. Can't wait to see this guy destroy defenses.

That sounds good.

O.city 04-26-2013 09:57 AM

He needs to lock down the LT spot for 10 years. We shouldn't have to worry about looking for a LT for a while.

InChiefsHeaven 04-26-2013 09:58 AM

Day one starter who looks like he's been there before. Lowest sacks allowed on the team. He should be able to move fast to block downfield on screens. Anchor this offensive line for 10+ seasons.

O.city 04-26-2013 09:58 AM

Pillar of Chiefs teams for the next 7-10 years.

KC_Lee 04-26-2013 09:59 AM

I expect him to play all positions on the line, at once, and block the entire front seven of the opposing D all by himself.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:04 AM

If he busts, it will arguably be worse than a Qb bust would have been for us.

We will have traded away a LT we know can play the spot and then have to find another LT.

Discuss Thrower 04-26-2013 10:06 AM

A solid but not outstanding OT. He's not going to be confused for Willie Roaf anytime soon.

The Bad Guy 04-26-2013 10:07 AM

He has to be in the top 5 at his position by the start of year 3.

Beef Supreme 04-26-2013 10:07 AM

I predict pain.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9630978)
He has to be in the top 5 at his position by the start of year 3.

Yep.


However, he's being billed as a plug and play type guy, so I'm expecting it to happen a bit faster than that.

Fairplay 04-26-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630882)
What are the expectations for him, year 1?

Eat at 5 BBQ restaurants in the area.


By year 2?

Eat at ten BBQ restaurants in the area.

Year 5?

Eat at all BBQ restaurants in the city.

:D

KChiefs1 04-26-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630908)
I expect him to be an instant upgrade to Albert at LT, a top 10 LT day 1, and an all pro by year 2 or 3.

THIS.

Halfcan 04-26-2013 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9630902)
He better be a HOF player to justify the pick. Lane Johnson will end up being a better tackle in my opinion and I think Jeckel will likely bust.

So who should they have picked- Johnson? The pick is in- it is Fisher- so pouting like a whiney little bitch, neg repping people that thought it was a good pick and telling people to die in fires- isnt going to change anything.

Chiefs are in for a great year- if you don't want to be part of it- don't. Nobody needs your crybaby negative attitude on here anyway. so STFU!!

Easy 6 04-26-2013 10:13 AM

Skull**** all comers, thats what i expect.

Halfcan 04-26-2013 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 9630979)
I predict pain.

:thumb: We are going to fun all over teams, control the clock and give our defense more than 2 minutes at a time to get a drink and catch their breath like last year.

I think Charles will put up Priest type numbers this year.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:16 AM

Andy Reid is going to run all over teams and control the clock? Have you ever watched football before?

Buehler445 04-26-2013 10:17 AM

What he needs to be to not be an absolute bomb of a pick - Ogden

What I expect - On a similar plane as Albert with a little more power and a little less quickness. Basically we used 1.1 on Albert when we already had Albert.

HemiEd 04-26-2013 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 9630896)
All Pro by his second year, franchise tagged once his first contract is up, traded after tagged.

rinse and repeat

O.city 04-26-2013 10:18 AM

He absolutely has more upside to be much better than Albert.


I don't like this at all, but lets not get carried away.

BlackHelicopters 04-26-2013 10:19 AM

To the right 53 watchtower..............

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2013 10:20 AM

I remember when Jason Smith was talking about how much of a mean streak he had and how scouts and executives fell in love with him.

Fisher talked a lot about his mean streak, but one of the most consistent dings on his scouting report is a lack of a nasty demeanor and a mean streak.

He's talked a lot about how he's a mauler, but has he actually shown it?

Looks like a finesse LT to me. Similar to Jason Peters. He'll likely be an excellent pass protector and a 'meh' run blocker just based on his frame and demeanor.

ChiefsCountry 04-26-2013 10:21 AM

Considering other than Jake Long, the other two tackles taken #1 are Hall of Famers. Wouldn't you expect that?

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 10:25 AM

I expect him to have at least 15 pancake blocks this season. He should be up to 20-25 by his 3rd season in.

Dave Lane 04-26-2013 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9631011)
:thumb: We are going to fun all over teams, control the clock and give our defense more than 2 minutes at a time to get a drink and catch their breath like last year.

I think Charles will put up Priest type numbers this year.

I think he will be worse than Albert year 1-2 hopefully gets Smiff enough time to throw that we can move on without excuses for his mediocrity.

By year 3-4 he should be as good as Albert is now with maybe a tiny bit of improvement and then after that an improvement.

So we will be worse for a few years then maybe a bit better.

DJ's left nut 04-26-2013 10:28 AM

Year 1 - needs to be as good as Albert by mid-season
Year 2 - Pro Bowl
Year 4 - NFL All Pro
Second Contract - Perennial All-Pro and anchor to a championship caliber line in front of a SB caliber QB.

Less than that will be disappointing and should be viewed as disappointing.

Chief_For_Life58 04-26-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9630893)
Pro Bowler, Chiefs Ring of Fame and eventually HOF. Can't wait to see this guy destroy defenses.

this

bevischief 04-26-2013 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9631079)
Year 1 - needs to be as good as Albert by mid-season
Year 2 - Pro Bowl
Year 4 - NFL All Pro
Second Contract - Perennial All-Pro and anchor to a championship caliber line in front of a SB caliber QB.

Less than that will be disappointing and should be viewed as disappointing.

This.

Rasputin 04-26-2013 10:34 AM

I expect Super Bowls

DJ's left nut 04-26-2013 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9631025)
What he needs to be to not be an absolute bomb of a pick - Ogden

What I expect - On a similar plane as Albert with a little more power and a little less quickness. Basically we used 1.1 on Albert when we already had Albert.

Oh c'mon - Fisher is going to be much quicker than Albert.

I think some folks are really understating Fisher's potential because they don't like that we went tackle.

He's a great athlete that has plus strength for his weight (as opposed to Joeckel, who's strength is below what someone with his size should be). He's going to add a little more bulk and probably play in the 315-325 range. And while I'm with Hamas in that I'm not sure I ever see that 'mean streak' so many talk about, he's simply an incredible athlete for someone his size and his body suggests that he will be damn strong as well.

Fisher has everything you'd want in a LT apart from the mammoth frame that Ogden had. In the end, it's neither impossible or unlikely that he could end up similar to Pace in terms of size and athleticism. Pace also had amazing technique and that will be what ultimately decides Fisher's fate. If he can develop the kind of technique that Pace had, he could approach that class of tackle.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2013 10:35 AM

What he needs to be: A HOF LT

What Chiefs fans will be happy with: Ryan Clady

HemiEd 04-26-2013 10:40 AM

I hope he is as good as Brandon Albert in three years.

Rasputin 04-26-2013 10:42 AM

To win or help win us Super Bowls.







Is that too much to ask?

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9631111)
What he needs to be: A HOF LT

Does he? What if he only becomes about Brandon Albert level, but the Chiefs win the super bowl in 3 or 4 years?

WOuld that satisfy you?

Fairplay 04-26-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9631039)
I remember when Jason Smith was talking about how much of a mean streak he had and how scouts and executives fell in love with him.

Fisher talked a lot about his mean streak, but one of the most consistent dings on his scouting report is a lack of a nasty demeanor and a mean streak.

He's talked a lot about how he's a mauler, but has he actually shown it?

Looks like a finesse LT to me. Similar to Jason Peters. He'll likely be an excellent pass protector and a 'meh' run blocker just based on his frame and demeanor.



Hamas I know this draft sucks balls, but who should the Chiefs have selected with their first pick?

O.city 04-26-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631167)
Does he? What if he only becomes about Brandon Albert level, but the Chiefs win the super bowl in 3 or 4 years?

WOuld that satisfy you?

Then he hasn't lived up to expectations but the team is better around him?

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 9631169)
Hamas I know this draft sucks balls, but who should the Chiefs have selected with their first pick?

Exactly what ive been saying. YOu know who 31 other teams would have selected at #1? Joeckel or Fisher. This isnt some TyJack reach.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631176)
Exactly what ive been saying. YOu know who 31 other teams would have selected at #1? Joeckel or Fisher. This isnt some TyJack reach.

No one is saying it's a reach.


But the guy is billed as a LT worthy of the first pick. Look at the others billed as that. Therefor, he should be held to a high standard.

Rasputin 04-26-2013 10:52 AM

They better have got it right because any player that turns out to be a better pick is going make them look stupid.

loochy 04-26-2013 10:56 AM

i expect him to stand there and push people like OL guys do

hometeam 04-26-2013 10:58 AM

I expect himto be worse than BA for at least 3 years. In his 4th season he will be almost as good as BA, and demand to be paid. I then expect him to be traded and for us to draft an LT at 1.1 again becuase QBs are too risky.

Bugeater 04-26-2013 10:59 AM

30 TD, 0 INT

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9631196)
They better have got it right because any player that turns out to be a better pick is going make them look stupid.


The only thing that could derail him is injuries.

I expect him to be at least as good as Albert, and thats good enough........to win a championship, as long as all the other pieces are in place

keg in kc 04-26-2013 11:00 AM

If he can only be "Branden Albert level" then he has no business being drafted #1.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2013 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631167)
Does he? What if he only becomes about Brandon Albert level, but the Chiefs win the super bowl in 3 or 4 years?

WOuld that satisfy you?

Is an asteroid taking out huge swaths of the US that I don't know about?

If he plays at a BA level, then how did spending 1.1 actually help the Chiefs win the SB?

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9631236)
If he can only be "Branden Albert level" then he has no business being drafted #1.

What do you want him to do? Cure cancer? There is only so much impact a tackle can have.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631244)
What do you want him to do? Cure cancer? There is only so much impact a tackle can have.

Jesus. Rationalizing the pick already?

Halfcan 04-26-2013 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9631020)
Andy Reid is going to run all over teams and control the clock? Have you ever watched football before?

:thumb:

Charles had a Great year last year- and teams KNEW what was coming- we had ZERO passing game and some of the worst QB play of all time. Hell we tied a record for Not having a lead in a game most of the year. We ran our defense to death as well with Cashole coughing the ball up every other play.

If we get anything out of the TE position and Something out of Baldwin we should have a great offense this year- Light years better than last.

Jeez cheer up Chiefs fans- We have a great team this year!!

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2013 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 9631169)
Hamas I know this draft sucks balls, but who should the Chiefs have selected with their first pick?

I really should just macro a response.

If they didn't want a QB, I thought the best player in the draft was Jarvis Jones.

Edit: There were close to ten player I would have been satisfied with.

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9631247)
Jesus. Rationalizing the pick already?

heh, no...just laughing at you guys who expect every top pick to be able to perform miracles.

If he helps turn the franchise around, but only becomes a good, but not transcendent player, he was still worth it. Examples: Drew Bledsoe, Kerry Collins

Buehler445 04-26-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631232)
The only thing that could derail him is injuries.

I expect him to be at least as good as Albert, and thats good enough........to win a championship, as long as all the other pieces are in place

I'm not satisfied with that. If all he can be is Albert, WTF are we doing? You don't trade a good known player for an unknown (from Central Michigan no less) and 1.1. We would have been far better off to pay Albert and go fill some other hole if all we're going to end up with is Albert.

DJ's left nut 04-26-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631244)
What do you want him to do? Cure cancer? There is only so much impact a tackle can have.

He needs to be better than Brandon Albert level.

Though I certainly take exception to the folks around here that are arguing that he can't be.

Albert was a technical wreck, we all realize that - right? I mean Albert's a good tackle, but he's in that 8-10 range with a lot of other good tackles.

Do people really not believe that Fisher is capable of being a hell of a lot better than that? There is literally no single area where Albert is physically a better prospect than Fisher. Albert managed to get by through some of the most unconventionally effective blocking you'll ever see. He's the Dominick Hasek of left-tackles; you would never teach anyone to do what he does.

And while that made him effective, it also limited his ceiling somewhat.

Fisher's is well beyond Albert's and I truly do believe Fisher will prove to be Albert's equal by mid-season.

Guys, Fisher is a really really good prospect. Someone please tell me what it is they see in this kid that makes them think that he's 3-4 years removed from being a top 10 LT in this league?

If he is, the pick is an unqualified failure. I don't think that will be the case.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631270)
heh, no...just laughing at you guys who expect every top pick to be able to perform miracles.

If he helps turn the franchise around, but only becomes a good, but not transcendent player, he was still worth it. Examples: Drew Bledsoe, Kerry Collins

So basically you just don't care how he does and you'll be happy regardless.

Buehler445 04-26-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9631110)
Oh c'mon - Fisher is going to be much quicker than Albert.

I think some folks are really understating Fisher's potential because they don't like that we went tackle.

He's a great athlete that has plus strength for his weight (as opposed to Joeckel, who's strength is below what someone with his size should be). He's going to add a little more bulk and probably play in the 315-325 range. And while I'm with Hamas in that I'm not sure I ever see that 'mean streak' so many talk about, he's simply an incredible athlete for someone his size and his body suggests that he will be damn strong as well.

Fisher has everything you'd want in a LT apart from the mammoth frame that Ogden had. In the end, it's neither impossible or unlikely that he could end up similar to Pace in terms of size and athleticism. Pace also had amazing technique and that will be what ultimately decides Fisher's fate. If he can develop the kind of technique that Pace had, he could approach that class of tackle.

Maybe I'm higher on Albert than you guys are, but Albert is pretty ****ing good.

ChiefGator 04-26-2013 11:10 AM

Tony Boselli good.

ShortRoundChief 04-26-2013 11:10 AM

I'm curious as to what expectations can be made?

It would seem logical that he starts game 1 and blocks well.

King_Chief_Fan 04-26-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630882)
So, we took the best LT available in the entire draft. Looks to be a good pick.


What are the expectations for him, year 1? By year 2? Year 5?

Depending on what they do with Albert will make a difference, but assuming they trade Albert.

1) plow a hole for JC to tear through
2) keep Alex on his feet while in the pocket

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9631286)
So basically you just don't care how he does and you'll be happy regardless.

No, of course not. I hope he becomes a top player of course. I just realize hes only one piece of the puzzle. Team game.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631299)
No, of course not. I hope he becomes a top player of course. I just realize hes only one piece of the puzzle. Team game.

Whereas I think trading away Branden Albert to draft the next Branden Albert 15 spots higher isn't a very smart way of running a franchise. I'd like to think he can be more than that. I mean seriously, shouldn't the Pro Bowl be a minimum floor for a #1 overall pick? I don't think you can expect anyone to be a hall of famer, but what's the point of drafting a guy at #1 if it isn't to get one of the best players in the league at his position? How exactly is that desire unrealistic?

And I'm told over and over how great this new front office is. So if it turns out that he isn't better than either Joeckel or Johnson, that's going to be a major disappointment.

mikey23545 04-26-2013 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 9630979)
I predict pain.


LMAO

DJ's left nut 04-26-2013 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9631289)
Maybe I'm higher on Albert than you guys are, but Albert is pretty ****ing good.

He is, I agree.

But he's not great. His ceiling isn't great. Fisher's is.

You focus on Albert's quickness. Here's all I can do to highlight the difference in their respective athleticism:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/pictu...pictureid=1349

Fisher is bigger, he's stronger, he's faster, he's quicker, he's more explosive. He is, across the board, a significantly better athlete than Brandon Albert. In many instances it isn't even a close question.

Fisher can truly be a Joe Thomas type of tackle. Now I will listen all day to people that want to debate the value of an elite LT in the modern NFL - it's a legitimate argument.

But this crybaby bullshit from folks that are moping about like there's no way Fisher can ever approach the performance that we got from Albert is just silly. Fisher can be, should be, and in my opinion will be a significantly better all-around LT than Brandon Albert.

suzzer99 04-26-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9631324)
He is, I agree.

But he's not great. His ceiling isn't great. Fisher's is.

You focus on Albert's quickness. Here's all I can do to highlight the difference in their respective athleticism:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/pictu...pictureid=1349

Fisher is bigger, he's stronger, he's faster, he's quicker, he's more explosive. He is, across the board, a significantly better athlete than Brandon Albert. In many instances it isn't even a close question.

Fisher can truly be a Joe Thomas type of tackle. Now I will listen all day to people that want to debate the value of an elite LT in the modern NFL - it's a legitimate argument.

But this crybaby bullshit from folks that are moping about like there's no way Fisher can ever approach the performance that we got from Albert is just silly. Fisher can be, should be, and in my opinion will be a significantly better all-around LT than Brandon Albert.

Pulling shotgun... out of mouth...

Deberg_1990 04-26-2013 11:33 AM

Who has the longer arms?

Albert or Fisher?

mikey23545 04-26-2013 11:33 AM

Some of you need to leaf through your Geno Smith scrapbooks and find your favorite photo of him, and beat off to it until you're spent.

Maybe you'll finally feel better, or at least surfeited.

Imon Yourside 04-26-2013 11:34 AM

I expect Fisher had better throw at least 3 TD's per game and avg about 250 yards as well.

DJ's left nut 04-26-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9631371)
Who has the longer arms?

Albert or Fisher?

Fisher by a hair under an inch; 34 1/2 to 33 5/8

Not an insignificant amount when looking for a LT, though not a deal-breaker kindof issue either. Fisher's are slightly above average, Albert's slightly below.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.