ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL Concussions (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280556)

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:06 PM

NFL Concussions
 
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2014/0...cmp=latestnews

Garcia Bronco 01-10-2014 02:11 PM

Good for them

TLO 01-10-2014 02:12 PM

Smell my finger.

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 02:13 PM

NFL Concussions
 
This can leave no doubt that NFL sidelines and extra points are fixed.

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:20 PM

Just goes to show how stupid the nfl concussion protocol is.

Garcia Bronco 01-10-2014 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359588)
Just goes to show how stupid the nfl concussion protocol is.

Personally I would tell the doctor to **** off unless I couldn't stand.

BlackHelicopters 01-10-2014 02:28 PM

Genital warts

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:28 PM

Agreed 10000% Garcia. .....

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359588)
Just goes to show how stupid the nfl concussion protocol is.

How does it show that?

Fritz88 01-10-2014 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359588)
Just goes to show how stupid the nfl concussion protocol is.

How is the league to blame if the player is the one who refused to follow protocol?

I can't judge if the protocol is good or bad, but from the article it seems players were at fault.
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 01-10-2014 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359601)
How does it show that?

My guess is the reference to one of the players who just stayed on the sideline but did not reenter the game.

With it being a playoff game and all I can see a guy telling them to **** off I am not going to go sit in the locker room.

I assume the rule is there to prevent players from grabbing a helmet and going back out.

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:34 PM

Some former nfl players were talking about it this morning saying that it's only in place to protect the nfl from lawsuits. They said the players associated really is beginning to hate the protocol because you start getting labeled as a problem once you get one concussion.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10359608)
My guess is the reference to one of the players who just stayed on the sideline but did not reenter the game.

With it being a playoff game and all I can see a guy telling them to **** off I am not going to go sit in the locker room.

I assume the rule is there to prevent players from grabbing a helmet and going back out.

Seemed like he was saying that something in the story is proof that the NFL protocol itself is stupid. I don't really know if it is or isn't, but I don't know what part of that story would lead to that opinion.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359610)
Some former nfl players were talking about it this morning saying that it's only in place to protect the nfl from lawsuits. They said the players associated really is beginning to hate the protocol because you start getting labeled as a problem once you get one concussion.

Maybe the players association will propose the players waive all rights to sue later for head injuries in exchange for the NFL letting the player decide whether or not he is injured.

Think that will happen?

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:44 PM

I don't know but one of the sports radio guy on nfl radio said that it was even more noticeable in the playoffs because cameras are everywhere. He thought we might see some big names get taken out of games this weekend.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 02:44 PM

I can understand the players' frustration. As a fan, I get frustrated when someone can't play. But we're talking about a guy's BRAIN. Maybe there should be a bit more precaution taken as compared to some other injuries?

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359651)
I don't know but one of the sports radio guy on nfl radio said that it was even more noticeable in the playoffs because cameras are everywhere. He thought we might see some big names get taken out of games this weekend.

That's a pretty worthless statement. We might...or we might not.
He's predicting who might get a head injury?

Donger 01-10-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359653)
I can understand the players' frustration. As a fan, I get frustrated when someone can't play. But we're talking about a guy's BRAIN. Maybe there should be a bit more precaution taken as compared to some other injuries?

Are you suggesting that a player who fails the protocol test should be forced to not play even if they want to continue?

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:48 PM

They also said that defensive players are starting to talk in code about it being worth getting a fine to knock opposing players out of games because it's easier with this protocol.

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 02:50 PM

NFL Concussions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359664)
Are you suggesting that a player who fails the protocol test should be forced to not play even if they want to continue?

It's not the employee's call. Corporate headquarters says he isn't allowed to work.

How would the player be able to make a proper decision anyway? He has a brain injury.

Mr. Laz 01-10-2014 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359610)
Some former nfl players were talking about it this morning saying that it's only in place to protect the nfl from lawsuits. They said the players associated really is beginning to hate the protocol because you start getting labeled as a problem once you get one concussion.

All they have to do is drop the lawsuits.

One moment the players say 'it's a violent game, we know the risks ... let us play!' The next they are joining a lawsuit to sue the NFL for some kind of head trauma they say they incurred while playing in the NFL.


make up your minds

Jimmya 01-10-2014 02:55 PM

He mentioned some of the colts players talking about the "stingers" they got Charles with. I'm guessing stingers is now code for knocking guys out of games.

Donger 01-10-2014 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 10359680)
It's not the employee's call. Corporate headquarters says he isn't allowed to work.

How would the player be able to make a proper decision anyway? He has a brain injury.

It should be the employee's call.

Mr. Laz 01-10-2014 02:56 PM

The colts definitely started trying to take shots in the 2nd half against us.

Bowser 01-10-2014 03:00 PM

I'm still of the belief that in the near future rookies entering the NFL are going to be forced to either sign a waiver protecting the league from lawsuits relating to all future harm that may befall them in the league, or don't play in the league.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359664)
Are you suggesting that a player who fails the protocol test should be forced to not play even if they want to continue?

"Forced to not play" is an interesting way of putting it.
I can't say whether or not the protocol itself is proper or effective--I'm not a doctor. I'm assuming they know something.

But if a guy hurts his knee and the sideline doctor says he thinks there may be damage and there's risk of greater injury--do you let the guy back in the game even if he says he'll play through the pain? Of course not.

Jimmya 01-10-2014 03:02 PM

The Eagles radio man on Sirius said that officials have been told to protect the big name qbs at ALL cost in the playoffs.

MahiMike 01-10-2014 03:02 PM

This is not good news for Jamaal.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 10359712)
I'm still of the belief that in the near future rookies entering the NFL are going to be forced to either sign a waiver protecting the league from lawsuits relating to all future harm that may befall them in the league, or don't play in the league.

Agreed.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 10359689)
All they have to do is drop the lawsuits.

One moment the players say 'it's a violent game, we know the risks ... let us play!' The next they are joining a lawsuit to sue the NFL for some kind of head trauma they say they incurred while playing in the NFL.


make up your minds

I'm sure in the next CBA the player's union will propose the players wiave all rights to sue in return for letting the player decide if he goes back in.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359720)
do you let the guy back in the game even if he says he'll play through the pain? Of course not.

Yes, you do. He's a grown man. Let him make his own decisions.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359700)
It should be the employee's call.

You maybe should see a doctor. You are exhibiting behavior indicative of repeated and severe head trauma.

Jimmya 01-10-2014 03:05 PM

My question is who are the big name qbs. ....does that include guys like Foles....Smith?

Donger 01-10-2014 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359732)
You maybe should see a doctor. You are exhibiting behavior indicative of repeated and severe head trauma.

As should you. My wife can recommend a great OB/GYN if you want.

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 03:09 PM

NFL Concussions
 
.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 10359744)
Bullshit.

No, she really does have a great OB/GYN. He's a bit nuts, but a great doctor.

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359700)
It should be the employee's call.

Bullshit.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359729)
Yes, you do. He's a grown man. Let him make his own decisions.

Well, if you're the employer paying a guy $1M a year (which you still have to pay if the guy gets injured), I'd say you get veto power as to whether a hurt player re-enters the game. Geez, you're honestly saying that a player and not the doctor or team/employer gets to decide on the seriousness of an injury?

That is so ridiculous I'd have to say you're at trolling level here.

Dartgod 01-10-2014 03:13 PM

Whoa, whoa...

So the concussion protocol says that the concussed player must leave the sideline and stay put in the locker room for the remainder of the game?

I've been told that Jamaal's injury was suspicious (fake) because he did not return to the sideline to be with his teammates.

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359753)
Well, if you're the employer paying a guy $1M a year (which you still have to pay if the guy gets injured), I'd say you get veto power as to whether a hurt player re-enters the game. Geez, you're honestly saying that a player and not the doctor or team/employer gets to decide on the seriousness of an injury?

That is so ridiculous I'd have to say you're at trolling level here.

He's bored.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359753)
Well, if you're the employer paying a guy $1M a year (which you still have to pay if the guy gets injured), I'd say you get veto power as to whether a hurt player re-enters the game. Geez, you're honestly saying that a player and not the doctor or team/employer gets to decide on the seriousness of an injury?

That is so ridiculous I'd have to say you're at trolling level here.

Yes. If the player is advised not to return and he does anyway, he forfeits pay if he can't play later due to the injury.

Jimmya 01-10-2014 03:13 PM

They also want and need their one million dollar investment working not sitting on the sideline. What keeps ownership from releasing this investment if they feel he gets hurt to easy?

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 03:17 PM

"Donger, as your employer, I order you to leave the building."

"No, sir. I refuse. As an employee, it should be my choice."

"Security, remove Mr. Donger from the building."

penguinz 01-10-2014 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 10359723)
This is not good news for Jamaal.

Your and idiot.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 10359761)
Whoa, whoa...

So the concussion protocol says that the concussed player must leave the sideline and stay put in the locker room for the remainder of the game?

I've been told that Jamaal's injury was suspicious (fake) because he did not return to the sideline to be with his teammates.

Yeah...because Joe Montana returned to the bench once 20 years ago.
rabblerouser is a moron.

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359767)
They also want and need their one million dollar investment working not sitting on the sideline. What keeps ownership from releasing this investment if they feel he gets hurt to easy?

Nothing.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359766)
Yes. If the player is advised not to return and he does anyway, he forfeits pay if he can't play later due to the injury.

I disagree with you on a lot of stuff, but I don't recall ever seeing you in this mode--channeling some of the most ridiculous and least intelligent posters on CP. Hope you feel better soon.

Dayze 01-10-2014 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 10359780)
"Donger, as your employer, I order you to leave the building."

"No, sir. I refuse. As an employee, it should be my choice."

"Security, remove Mr. Donger from the building."

and take the oil he has stashed in his desk.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 10359762)
He's bored.

Or delirious from some type of illness.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359814)
I disagree with you on a lot of stuff, but I don't recall ever seeing you in this mode--channeling some of the most ridiculous and least intelligent posters on CP. Hope you feel better soon.

I realize that you are prone to believing that people can't make decisions for themselves, yes. Nice to see it ooze into sports, too.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359767)
They also want and need their one million dollar investment working not sitting on the sideline. What keeps ownership from releasing this investment if they feel he gets hurt to easy?

Like if they decide his skull is too mushy for football? Well, if they release him after a concussion or other injury, they are going to be paying his full salary for the year. If you're even on the roster after a certain date, you're entitled to your full-year salary.

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359825)
I realize that you are prone to believing that people can't make decisions for themselves, yes. Nice to see it ooze into sports, too.

Oh, I support their ability to choose to play sports. I don't think anyone should really stop them from going down to the park to join a pickup game or do whatever else they want. But I don't give him the right to decide to go back into a football game for which he is being paid to do what the team tells him to do. If the team wants to sit him and not risk further injury to their player--I don't even see how you can argue with that.

What do you think of boxing referees who stop the fight when the guy is having is head beaten in and his eyes are rolling around? Ask the fighter if he wants to continue?

ClevelandBronco 01-10-2014 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10359825)
I realize that you are prone to believing that people can't make decisions for themselves, yes. Nice to see it ooze into sports, too.

Ooze is a good word. It's what the player's blood is doing inside his damaged brain, which might just compromise his ability to decide.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 10359860)
Ooze is a good word. It's what the player's blood is doing inside his damaged brain, which might just compromise his ability to decide.

Thanks. I used it intentionally.

Jimmya 01-10-2014 03:36 PM

I can guarantee you that all of these old school head coaches would let them go back it.

Donger 01-10-2014 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359859)
Oh, I support their ability to choose to play sports. I don't think anyone should really stop them from going down to the park to join a pickup game or do whatever else they want. But I don't give him the right to decide to go back into a football game for which he is being paid to do what the team tells him to do. If the team wants to sit him and not risk further injury to their player--I don't even see how you can argue with that.

I already gave you my argument.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359859)
What do you think of boxing referees who stop the fight when the guy is having is head beaten in and his eyes are rolling around? Ask the fighter if he wants to continue?

Yes.

chiefzilla1501 01-10-2014 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359610)
Some former nfl players were talking about it this morning saying that it's only in place to protect the nfl from lawsuits. They said the players associated really is beginning to hate the protocol because you start getting labeled as a problem once you get one concussion.

The NFL and the players association know a lot of the right things to do, yet don't do it, and it's killing the game. I want to see the best players on the field all the time, and it takes the fun out of the game when you have to repeatedly account for injuries.

Nzoner 01-10-2014 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10359663)
That's a pretty worthless statement. We might...or we might not.
He's predicting who might get a head injury?

You didn't know the NFL let's certain info get leaked through their medias to prepare their viewers?

cosmo20002 01-10-2014 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10360162)
You didn't know the NFL let's certain info get leaked through their medias to prepare their viewers?

So...the NFL has planned that some "big names" will be injured and removed from games this weekend and they leaked that to prepare viewers?

O-K...because leaking the info prior to it happening would be a good way to cover up that they have rigged the games by planning fake injuries....:tinfoil:

Deberg_1990 01-10-2014 07:22 PM

I'd like to see Manning get his "bell rung" this weekend.

Nzoner 01-11-2014 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10360274)
So...the NFL has planned that some "big names" will be injured and removed from games this weekend and they leaked that to prepare viewers?

O-K...because leaking the info prior to it happening would be a good way to cover up that they have rigged the games by planning fake injuries....:tinfoil:

LMAO

"we're going to need a bigger boat"

tk13 01-11-2014 12:34 PM

Bill Simmons brought up a good point in his column this week. Last weeks' Chiefs game might be the day we draw the line between old football and new football. Now it's going to be hanging over every playoff game.

-King- 01-11-2014 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10360162)
You didn't know the NFL let's certain info get leaked through their medias to prepare their viewers?

Does this even make sense in your head?
Posted via Mobile Device

durtyrute 01-11-2014 03:33 PM

Why is shit like this coming out AFTER we lost three players during a playoff game due to...

concussions?

Dunerdr 01-11-2014 07:06 PM

Wow this has turned into a real shit fit. I like the dig at Cosmo and not believing in letting people make decisions for themselves. From what little time I've ventured to D.C. That is his political view. However he's definitely got the better argument. Maybe the player should be checked by a few doctors I'm going to say 3. Just to bury this rigged talk. A team dr. An nfl dr, and a local dr. If there's any disagreement on the diagnoses the player can return. But only if two dr's rule in his favor. And he's signed a waiver.

Nzoner 01-11-2014 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10361254)
Does this even make sense in your head?
Posted via Mobile Device

Maybe you should read the entire thread before posting and if not at least post #61

Chiefshrink 01-11-2014 08:19 PM

Concussions created by big trial lawyers and the players union. Players can call in sick when they are playing hookey and trial lawyers get rich. You do the math:D

cosmo20002 01-11-2014 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 10362395)
Wow this has turned into a real shit fit. I like the dig at Cosmo and not believing in letting people make decisions for themselves. From what little time I've ventured to D.C. That is his political view. However he's definitely got the better argument. Maybe the player should be checked by a few doctors I'm going to say 3. Just to bury this rigged talk. A team dr. An nfl dr, and a local dr. If there's any disagreement on the diagnoses the player can return. But only if two dr's rule in his favor. And he's signed a waiver.

Well, that is ridiculous, but we're obviously not talking about someone making personal choices for himself. We're talking about an employer who is paying an employee and has a right to protect its interests both in terms of its investment in the player in keeping him healthy for the good of the team as well as liability issues.

What I find funny is that we are obviously used to things like knee injuries in football. If the team sits a player after he hurts his knee, no one raises a stink about it being the player's decision when to return.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2014 08:47 AM

I'm ****ing sick of this. We are all standing in the way of this problem being handled better. The problem won't be solved, but it can be made better.

"Heads up" is a great direction. Teach kids how to tackle properly, teach them to use their equipment properly, and recognize good coaches who teach good habits. Even THAT is being questioned for its motives. Why? Because people want something to complain about.
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/...former-players

The NFL needs to keep backing "Heads up." They need to start enforcing helmet and mouthpiece rules. And they need to keep fining players who lead with their head. Simple solutions. But right now, it's really us fans, our crazy legal system, and the player's union that are getting in the way.

Jimmya 01-12-2014 09:03 AM

I like heads up.

cosmo20002 01-12-2014 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 10359651)
I don't know but one of the sports radio guy on nfl radio said that it was even more noticeable in the playoffs because cameras are everywhere. He thought we might see some big names get taken out of games this weekend.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10360162)
You didn't know the NFL let's certain info get leaked through their medias to prepare their viewers?

So, were the big names knocked out yet? If not, I imagine there's got to be some nervous Broncos and Chargers out there.

BWillie 01-12-2014 01:14 PM

Shark Lavey signed a waiver and played his ass off

-King- 01-12-2014 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10362419)
Maybe you should read the entire thread before posting and if not at least post #61

I read. And what you're saying still makes no sense. But then again, you're one of the NFL conspiracy nuts so it makes sense.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 01-12-2014 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10364157)
So, were the big names knocked out yet? If not, I imagine there's got to be some nervous Broncos and Chargers out there.

LMAO
Posted via Mobile Device

Nzoner 01-12-2014 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10364157)
So, were the big names knocked out yet? If not, I imagine there's got to be some nervous Broncos and Chargers out there.

I see you didn't read post #61 either

cosmo20002 01-12-2014 07:05 PM

Broncos vs Patriots
49ers vs Seahawks

It is disgusting the way the league rigged things so that the best 4 teams are the only 4 still remaining.

Two teams with great QBs and two teams with great defenses--the only way this happens is if it is rigged.

Nzoner 01-13-2014 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10365834)
Broncos vs Patriots
49ers vs Seahawks

It is disgusting the way the league rigged things so that the best 4 teams are the only 4 still remaining.

Two teams with great QBs and two teams with great defenses--the only way this happens is if it is rigged.

That would depend on what you're basing best on because both of those great defenses gave up 27 and 34 points and lost to Luck and the Colts and one of those great qb's was beaten head to head by Luck and the Colts and all of that happened in a five week period.

Donger 01-13-2014 10:48 AM

People don't really believe that these games are rigged, right?

Nzoner 01-13-2014 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 10366834)
People don't really believe that these games are rigged, right?

I'll say this one more time,I do not believe entire games are rigged,however,I do believe point shaving and the like has gone on in certain games be it by a ref,player or even a coach to help tilt the lines and/or over unders in the favor of Vegas or to favor future match-ups which ultimately result in more advertising revenue and bigger profits for all involved.

Donger 01-13-2014 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10366876)
I'll say this one more time,I do not believe entire games are rigged,however,I do believe point shaving and the like has gone on in certain games be it by a ref,player or even a coach to help tilt the lines and/or over unders in the favor of Vegas or to favor future match-ups which ultimately result in more advertising revenue and bigger profits for all involved.

Okay.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.