ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Should the Texans have drafted Bortles instead of Clowney? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=285898)

Deberg_1990 08-23-2014 09:42 PM

Should the Texans have drafted Bortles instead of Clowney?
 
Figured I'd try my luck at one of these threads again.


Well, should they have?

The Franchise 08-23-2014 09:43 PM

Yes

KCrockaholic 08-23-2014 09:43 PM

New topic: Chiefs MNF Vs Patriots is the same day as the Royals in a World Series game. Which one do you watch more of?

TribalElder 08-23-2014 09:44 PM

Why was it named connect 4 instead of 4 in a row :shrug:

TEX 08-23-2014 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10845106)
Figured I'd try my luck at one of these threads again.


Well, should they have?

Nope. JC is legit. He and Watt together are gonna be something. Id draft JC over Bortles every time.

wazu 08-23-2014 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10845110)
New topic: Chiefs MNF Vs Patriots is the same day as the Royals in a World Series game. Which one do you watch more of?

I'll be physically at both, zip lining between the two stadiums as needed.

Easy 6 08-23-2014 09:55 PM

Yes.

Dude is Luck light.

chiefs1111 08-23-2014 09:57 PM

Yup....

Dave Lane 08-23-2014 10:01 PM

Most Chiefs fans don't understand a QB actually can help you win games. They don't have to be someone elses trash.

KCrockaholic 08-23-2014 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 10845165)
Most Chiefs fans don't understand a QB actually can help you win games. They don't have to be someone elses garbage trash.

Most Chiefs fans think QB is a plug and play position. Just give him the BEST OL in the NFL and GREAT receivers. And they'll be an all-star.

Deberg_1990 08-23-2014 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 10845165)
Most Chiefs fans don't understand a QB actually can help you win games. They don't have to be someone elses trash.

Who was the Bortles of last years draft?




*Crickets*

Lex Luthor 08-23-2014 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10845110)
New topic: Chiefs MNF Vs Patriots is the same day as the Royals in a World Series game. Which one do you watch more of?

Hmmm. Let's see. We've gone 29 years since the last time the Royals were in a World Series. They may never play in another one in our lifetimes.

The Chiefs played 16 regular season games last year, and they'll play 16 this year, and 16 next year, and 16 every year after that.

Silly question.

Lex Luthor 08-23-2014 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10845175)
Who was the Bortles of last years draft?




*Crickets*

Exactly. It doesn't do any good to want a quarterback when there isn't a decent one available.

ThaVirus 08-23-2014 10:11 PM

I'd have taken Clowney.

ThaVirus 08-23-2014 10:12 PM

Positional value be damned, Clowney is a generational talent.

jd1020 08-23-2014 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10845175)
Who was the Bortles of last years draft?




*Crickets*

Must be nice to limit the year to the one year the Chiefs don't draft a QB, right?

listopencil 08-23-2014 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 10845111)
Why was it named connect 4 instead of 4 in a row :shrug:

Because it doesn't have to be in a row. It can be in a column or diagonally.

TribalElder 08-23-2014 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10845205)
Because it doesn't have to be in a row. It can be in a column or diagonally.

Dude

Aliens

Tribal Warfare 08-23-2014 10:20 PM

I would definitely see why since the kid has everything you look for in a Franchise QB

Easy 6 08-23-2014 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10845198)
I'd have taken Clowney.

Its a very tight call, Clowney might just be the new Lawrence Taylor.

But comparing defensive value to QB these days is tough to do

BigCatDaddy 08-23-2014 10:27 PM

Yeah, they were morons. Franchise QB over even a HOF DE.

jonzie04 08-23-2014 10:32 PM

No. You do not pass on a once in a lifetime caliber prospect at the second most important position in the game, unless you have a pretty badass qb prospect like Cam Newton, or Luck.

'Hamas' Jenkins 08-23-2014 10:34 PM

Look at the 2011 Colts vs. the 2010 Colts or the 2008 Patriots vs the 2007 Patriots.

Can you imagine a single defensive player whose absence would ever cause such a precipitous decline?

jd1020 08-23-2014 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10845253)
Look at the 2011 Colts vs. the 2010 Colts or the 2008 Patriots vs the 2007 Patriots.

Can we not talk about that?

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2014 10:36 PM

Way too early for this shit

listopencil 08-23-2014 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 10845211)
Dude

Aliens

Well, yeah. Aliens too. That goes without saying.

OldSchool 08-23-2014 10:42 PM

Nope. Clowney is a once in a generation talent. You'd be an idiot to pass on that.

salame 08-23-2014 10:52 PM

yes

lcarus 08-23-2014 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10845110)
New topic: Chiefs MNF Vs Patriots is the same day as the Royals in a World Series game. Which one do you watch more of?

That's the night the Chiefs go for the sound record isn't it? Maybe the extra noise from the K will help out lol

kysirsoze 08-23-2014 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10845110)
New topic: Chiefs MNF Vs Patriots is the same day as the Royals in a World Series game. Which one do you watch more of?

The Chiefs will have plenty of Monday nights to lose to New England. The Royals might not make it back to the WS in my lifetime. Royals all the way. (Following the Chiefs getting killed via twitter)

Eleazar 08-23-2014 11:55 PM

2014 - Bortles (?)
2013 - (none)
2012 - Luck, Wilson, maybe Foles
2011 - Newton, Dalton
2010 - Bradford
2009 - Stafford
2008 - Ryan, Flacco
2007 - (none)
2006 - Cutler
2005 - Alex Smith, Aaron Rodgers

So in the last 10 drafts we have about 13 guys out of a total of 54 QBs drafted in the first 3 rounds who have stuck around or look like they will be able to stick around as starters.

It's no wonder a third of the league is QB-poor, because history tells us there is usually about 1 guy in each draft who will make it. Injuries or just not being good enough will claim the rest.

It's a sucker bet, but unless you convert one you can't realistically expect to win anything.

ChiliConCarnage 08-24-2014 04:12 AM

In hindsight, yes, it looks like they should have taken Bortles. At the time of the draft, I understand why it would have been difficult to pass on a freak like Clowney.

Tribal Warfare 08-24-2014 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 10845378)
2014 - Bortles (?)
2013 - (none)
2012 - Luck, Wilson, maybe Foles
2011 - Newton, Dalton
2010 - Bradford
2009 - Stafford
2008 - Ryan, Flacco
2007 - (none)
2006 - Cutler
2005 - Alex Smith, Aaron Rodgers

So in the last 10 drafts we have about 13 guys out of a total of 54 QBs drafted in the first 3 rounds who have stuck around or look like they will be able to stick around as starters.

It's no wonder a third of the league is QB-poor, because history tells us there is usually about 1 guy in each draft who will make it. Injuries or just not being good enough will claim the rest.

It's a sucker bet, but unless you convert one you can't realistically expect to win anything.


You forgot Tannehill

Bufkin 08-24-2014 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10845521)
You forgot Tannehill

Tannehill has mediocrity written all over him. He's the exact type of "franchise QB" that I've always feared. Not terrible enough to try out another quarterback for the next 10 years, but not great enough to provide consistent success.

baitism 08-24-2014 05:59 AM

Maybe wait until the season is over and re-visit this....

RealSNR 08-24-2014 07:44 AM

Bet the Rams feel even dumber for putting long-term faith in Bradford

BigBeauford 08-24-2014 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bufkin (Post 10845530)
Tannehill has mediocrity written all over him. He's the exact type of "franchise QB" that I've always feared. Not terrible enough to try out another quarterback for the next 10 years, but not great enough to provide consistent success.

For a second there, I thought you were talking about A. Smith.

Bufkin 08-24-2014 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 10845593)
For a second there, I thought you were talking about A. Smith.

They are similar in that regard.

John Dope 08-24-2014 08:47 AM

No

Prison Bitch 08-24-2014 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10845253)
Look at the 2011 Colts vs. the 2010 Colts or the 2008 Patriots vs the 2007 Patriots.

Can you imagine a single defensive player whose absence would ever cause such a precipitous decline?

Nonsense, you're talking about the extreme ends of the spectrum. Manning & Brady aren't typical QBs, they're HOFers. We're talking Blake Bortles here.



Besides, even Matt Cassel won 11 games for 2008 Patriots did he not?

GoChargers 08-24-2014 09:25 AM

As much as I like Clowney, in today's flag-football NFL, you're better off trying to get the next glory-boy quarterback who can draw favorable ref treatment than trying to build a dominant defense and settling for a game-manager QB.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-24-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10845521)
You forgot Tannehill

No he didn't

Pasta Little Brioni 08-24-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10845591)
Bet the Rams feel even dumber for putting long-term faith in Bradford

Ramsfan leapt off the Arch last night.

Mav 08-24-2014 10:01 AM

No.

they should of done one of two things.

they should of moved UP one spot to grab Teddy.

Clowney and TEDDY?

Or drafted Jimmy grappalo.

I would of still taken Clowney.

he has proven to be unblockable.

beach tribe 08-24-2014 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 10845111)
Why was it named connect 4 instead of 4 in a row :shrug:

Rhode Island

Neither a road nor island.

Mav 08-24-2014 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 10845378)
2014 - Bortles (?)
2013 - (none)
2012 - Luck, Wilson, maybe Foles
2011 - Newton, Dalton, KAEPERNICK
2010 - Bradford
2009 - Stafford
2008 - Ryan, Flacco
2007 - (none)
2006 - Cutler
2005 - Alex Smith, Aaron Rodgers

So in the last 10 drafts we have about 13 guys out of a total of 54 QBs drafted in the first 3 rounds who have stuck around or look like they will be able to stick around as starters.

It's no wonder a third of the league is QB-poor, because history tells us there is usually about 1 guy in each draft who will make it. Injuries or just not being good enough will claim the rest.

It's a sucker bet, but unless you convert one you can't realistically expect to win anything.

BOLDED

milkman 08-24-2014 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10845776)
Rhode Island

Neither a road nor island.

That's ****ing terrible.

Just Passin' By 08-24-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10845776)
Rhode Island

Neither a road nor island.


Rhode Island was another name for Aquidneck island.

Mr. Laz 08-24-2014 11:10 AM

we probably should have traded back and drafted Bridgewater.

and traded Alex Smith,Jamaal Charles,Dewayne Bowe,Tamba Hali and any other veteran we could get a draft pick for

If you are going to rebuild ...

then ****ing rebuild

'Hamas' Jenkins 08-24-2014 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 10845639)
Nonsense, you're talking about the extreme ends of the spectrum. Manning & Brady aren't typical QBs, they're HOFers. We're talking Blake Bortles here.



Besides, even Matt Cassel won 11 games for 2008 Patriots did he not?

If Clowney ends up with 180 sacks he still wouldn't be as valuable to a team as Phil Rivers, even if he's a much better football player. That's just the way the game is played.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-24-2014 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10845895)
If Clowney ends up with 180 sacks he still wouldn't be as valuable to a team as Phil Rivers, even if he's a much better football player. That's just the way the game is played.

Pretty much.

Rausch 08-24-2014 11:42 AM

Absolutely...

Boiled Chicken 08-24-2014 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10845110)
New topic: Chiefs MNF Vs Patriots is the same day as the Royals in a World Series game. Which one do you watch more of?

Don't mean to be a stick in the mud, but aren't World Series games in October?

Deberg_1990 10-09-2014 09:43 PM

Yes

TLO 10-09-2014 09:46 PM

You bastard.

OldSchool 10-09-2014 09:51 PM

No, Bortles would just lose games for them. He has thrown 2 INTs in every game that he has played so far.

They should tank for Mariota though.

cmh6476 10-09-2014 09:51 PM

I'd rather draft Bortles than read another DeBerg thread

BigCatDaddy 10-09-2014 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10998579)
No, Bortles would just lose games for them. He has thrown 2 INTs in every game that he has played so far.

They should tank for Mariota though.

Is this post serious? It seems like it is, but I can't believe anybody is that stupid.

ChiefsCountry 10-09-2014 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 10998615)
Is this post serious? It seems like it is, but I can't believe anybody is that stupid.

Alex Smith Cult Member

OldSchool 10-09-2014 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 10998615)
Is this post serious? It seems like it is, but I can't believe anybody is that stupid.

So Bortles doesn't have 6 INTs in 3 games?:)

BigCatDaddy 10-09-2014 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 10998667)
Alex Smith Cult Member

Oh, I'm aware and they are an odd bunch which if why I wasn't 100% sure if he was trolling with the writing off Bortles stuff or really that dumb.

Kaepernick 10-09-2014 11:00 PM

No. When these guys are on the field healthy together, it is going to be Mayhem. People will get hurt.

1.1 seemed way too high for Bortles. I don't think he is the best QB prospect in the draft, but who knows?

Kaepernick 10-09-2014 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 10845378)
2014 - Bortles (?)
2013 - (none)
2012 - Luck, Wilson, maybe Foles
2011 - Newton, Dalton, Kaepernick
2010 - Bradford
2009 - Stafford
2008 - Ryan, Flacco
2007 - (none)
2006 - Cutler
2005 - Alex Smith, Aaron Rodgers

So in the last 10 drafts we have about 13 guys out of a total of 54 QBs drafted in the first 3 rounds who have stuck around or look like they will be able to stick around as starters.

It's no wonder a third of the league is QB-poor, because history tells us there is usually about 1 guy in each draft who will make it. Injuries or just not being good enough will claim the rest.

It's a sucker bet, but unless you convert one you can't realistically expect to win anything.

FIXED THAT for you.

Mav 10-09-2014 11:07 PM

No. But they should of drafted jimmy groppalo with the first pick in the second.

Mav 10-09-2014 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 10998688)
FIXED THAT for you.

Yah... I fixed that over two months ago.

GoChargers 10-09-2014 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10998579)
No, Bortles would just lose games for them. He has thrown 2 INTs in every game that he has played so far.

They should tank for Mariota though.

Gotta love the Alexsexuals. When a young potential franchise QB like Bortles throws picks on an absolute garbage team, it's all his fault, but when their beloved Alex throws picks on stacked teams, then it's all the coach and the recievers' faults.

Kaepernick 10-09-2014 11:12 PM

Kaepernick ---- 60.7% completions, 4.8% TDs, 1.9% Ints, 93.3 passer rating in 32 starts.

Cam Newton -- 59.9% completions, 4.3% TDs, 2.7% Ints, 87.1 passer rating in 53 starts.

Andy Dalton -- 61.1% completions, 4.8% TDs, 2.9% Ints, 86.6 passer rating in 55 starts.

Ryan Tannehill - not worth the bother to post



Kaepernick is the best QB drafted in 2011. He performs the best with the least experience, 20 less starts than the other two.



And that is just stats, not the intangibles.

Biggest comeback victory in the history of the NFC Conference Championship game.

Longest rushing TD by a QB in the super bowl.

Longest run from scrimmage by a QB in a playoff game.

Most rushing yards from scrimmage by a QB in a playoff game.

Mav 10-09-2014 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 10998697)
Gotta love the Alexsexuals. When a young potential franchise QB like Bortles throws picks on an absolute garbage team, it's all his fault, but when their beloved Alex throws picks on stacked teams, then it's all the coach and the recievers' faults.

Gotta love Alex haters, no one gave Alex a pass then. He was very much bashed because the majority of fans then wanted the local kid Rodgers.

He got no passes.

And pointing out exactly what Bortles is doing is just what it is. Facts.


And when was alex Smith ever on a stacked team? Ever!

Mav 10-09-2014 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 10998700)
Kaepernick ---- 60.7% completions, 4.8% TDs, 1.9% Ints, 93.3 passer rating

Cam Newton -- 59.9% completions, 4.3% TDs, 2.7% Ints, 87.1 passer rating

Andy Dalton -- 61.1% completions, 4.8% TDs, 2.9% Ints, 86.6 passer rating

Ryan Tannehill - not worth the bother to post



Kaepernick is the best QB drafted in 2011.

Dumbass. Tannenhill wasn't in that ****ing draft reerun.

GoChargers 10-09-2014 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10998707)
Gotta love Alex haters, no one gave Alex a pass then.

He was given the "offensive coordinator" excuse every single season.

Quote:

And when was alex Smith ever on a stacked team? Ever!
2011 and 2012.

Mav 10-09-2014 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 10998716)
He was given the "offensive coordinator" excuse every single season.


2011 and 2012.

That's not an excuse. That's a logical reason for a qb to struggle. Being drafted to a shit team and having too much pressure is a reason, not an excuse.

The 2011, 2012 offenses were not stacked. Secondly, um he didn't throw many ints at all. So you fail there boss.

Eleazar 10-10-2014 04:55 AM

Yeah, but if Clowney works out, imagine having both those guys in your pass rush. Pretty scary.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-10-2014 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10845169)
Most Chiefs fans think QB is a plug and play position. Just give him the BEST OL in the NFL and GREAT receivers. And they'll be an all-star.

Don't forget the 5 tight ends!

Titty Meat 10-10-2014 09:32 AM

No but they should have drafted Guarapolo instead of a guard round 2

beach tribe 10-10-2014 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10845895)
If Clowney ends up with 180 sacks he still wouldn't be as valuable to a team as Phil Rivers, even if he's a much better football player. That's just the way the game is played.

Yup

BigMeatballDave 10-10-2014 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10998692)
No. But they should of drafted jimmy groppalo with the first pick in the second.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 10999101)
No but they should have drafted Guarapolo instead of a guard round 2



LOL Why does everyone seem to struggle spelling Garoppolo?

Mav 10-10-2014 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 10999239)
LOL Why does everyone seem to struggle spelling Garoppolo?

I'm on my phone.....

Easy 6 10-10-2014 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10998670)
So Bortles doesn't have 6 INTs in 3 games?:)

Bortles is the new Roethlisberger and nothing you say can change that, I'd trade away my whole flippin draft for that guy.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-10-2014 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10999379)
Bortles is the new Roethlisberger and nothing you say can change that, I'd trade away my whole flippin draft for that guy.

Too much talent and potential for KC.

Do not want.

Easy 6 10-10-2014 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 505 Chief (Post 10999383)
Too much talent and potential for KC.

Do not want.

LMAO I love the idea of Bray developing into something as much as anyone not named Tomahawk... but yeah, I'd trade all 4 of our guys for Bortles.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.