ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Late night bullshit: Which Chiefs team is better? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=287776)

Direckshun 10-24-2014 12:24 AM

Late night bullshit: Which Chiefs team is better?
 
Poll inspired by Rausch's discussion in zilla's thread on compensatory picks.

Rausch thinks the 2013 Chiefs team was better at this point in their season. I argue that his mother smells of elderberries.

Hammock Parties 10-24-2014 12:29 AM

About the same IMO.

More difficult schedule so we have come back down to earth as predicted.

Direckshun 10-24-2014 12:37 AM

QB: Smith in 2013 was executing Andy Reid's superconservative gameplan. This year he is slinging it a lot more, relatively speaking.

RB: 2014 Charles/Davis > 2013's Charles

WR: 2014 Bowe + nobodies < 2013 Bowe, Avery, and McCluster

OL: a wash

DL: Bailey/Poe/Vickerson > DeVito/Poe/Jackson

LB: 2013 wins simply because both starting ILBs went down with injury in 2014. 2014 has better passrushing depth

CB: Flowers/Smith/Dunta Robinson = Smith/Cooper-Fleming/Owens/Gaines

S: wash. 2013 had Berry, but 2013 also had Lewis.

Hammock Parties 10-24-2014 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 11045712)
QB: Smith in 2013 was executing Andy Reid's superconservative gameplan. This year he is slinging it a lot more, relatively speaking.

His YPG and YPC are actually slightly down.

MMXcalibur 10-24-2014 12:44 AM

This year's team.
Still trying to find out what in the hell happened against Tennessee, but I suppose that clunker is offset by us somehow winning in San Diego.

vailpass 10-24-2014 12:44 AM

Which smelled more of elderberry?

Buns 10-24-2014 02:04 AM

I don't feel like the Chiefs are going to shit the bed as much this year, compared to last year. Less screwing pooches, more laying pipe.

MMXcalibur 10-24-2014 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Virtua Chief (Post 11045741)
I don't feel like the Chiefs are going to shit the bed as much this year, compared to last year. Less screwing pooches, more laying pipe.

...well, you're done for.

You're hooked, and now they'll find a time/place to really stick that knife in good and deep.

jonzie04 10-24-2014 05:07 AM

this team is massively better. the players arent really any better on paper, actually they're worse but they are getting it done. The secondary is MUCH better. teams already know kcs weakness from the second half of last season yet here we are, the chiefs secondary has given up the least amount of receving yards in the entire nfl despite playing manning, rivers, brady, and kaep.

Our offense was historically bad for the first 9 games last season. we BARELY won games last season against a lot of 2nd rate qbs, despite winning the turnover battle by A LOT, and scoring a special teams touch down in what seemed like nearly every game, or atleast starting at the 50. the offense was flat out awful last season, despite having a much better o line. The chiefs this season, have been competitive despite not winning the turn overs, and not getting any contributions from ST's, while playing first rate QBs. If we can start forcing a few turnovers, and/or can start getting contributions from ST's we could beat any team in the nfl as badly as we beat the patriots. those are big ifs, although i do expect it to happen atleast another time or two this season.

Sutton has been much better this season, i think last season he pretty much blitzed 5-7 guys EVERY 3rd down. and he refused to bench guys who were playing awful, like cooper in the second half, kendrick, dunta, demps at times, etc.

Two-Twenty 10-24-2014 05:26 AM

This team is much better.

Less Marcus Cooper. Less Kendrick Lewis.

No way they beat New England last year.

Plus the 2013 draft class is playing good football.

Coochie liquor 10-24-2014 06:04 AM

We've played and beaten more quality opponents this year. Don't know if we make the playoffs, but I feel we're headed in the right direction.

TambaBerry 10-24-2014 06:19 AM

And you want a new contract, well the price just went down.

Marcellus 10-24-2014 06:26 AM

Our first 8 games this season are comparable to the last 8 games last season opponent wise and we will be 5-3 rather than 2-6 over that span.

Beat SD on the road, won in Miami, beat NE, and realistically without Reid being a dumbass could have beat Denver in Denver and SF in SF.

And Kelce has impact potential that could make our offense much more powerful.

No Kendrick Lewis!

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 10-24-2014 06:51 AM

The 2007 chiefs who were 4-3

Prison Bitch 10-24-2014 07:15 AM

Fire Dorsey - direckshun

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-24-2014 07:21 AM

"THEY'RE STILL SHITTY"!

Sankyou.

O.city 10-24-2014 09:07 AM

Didn't beat a single good team last year. Already beat 3 this year and were a direkshuns but hair away from beating 2 more on the road.

ILChief 10-24-2014 09:15 AM

But we lost 6 starters!

Simply Red 10-24-2014 09:18 AM

did Ty Law retire a Chief? no srsly...??

Ming the Merciless 10-24-2014 09:27 AM

Anyone who says last year's team is better doesn't know shit about the chiefs

Ming the Merciless 10-24-2014 09:30 AM

About the ONLY way this team is worse is pass protection...
And turnover ratio maybe?
So far, everything else is better or at least not worse.

prhom 10-24-2014 09:46 AM

I feel like this year's team has far better balance than last. We are not as explosive on defense or ST, but have hung tough against some really good QBs. We are not relying on a few big plays to win games, but are playing fairly consistent ball-control offense. I really love the third-down offense this year more than anything else. If we can keep converting at this rate we will be a very tough team down the stretch.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 09:51 AM

I dont see how anyone could vote for 2013.

The strength of schedule was much weaker.
Our depth is waaay better this year in most spots.
Sutton really seems to have a much better handle on the defense this year, while we're not getting as many turnovers, we're also not giving up as many big plays.

O.city 10-24-2014 10:01 AM

Turnovers are random.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 10:23 AM

I mostly agree with that, but I do think you can increase your chances for interceptions with aggressive blitzing, forcing the QB into hurried throws.

Of course the problem with that is that it also increases your chances to get burned for a big play... I like that Sutton isnt blitzing as much, we've definitely given up fewer big plays this year all while playing against much better QB's than last year.

RunKC 10-24-2014 10:42 AM

Easily 2014 best 3rd down team in the league. Few plays of 20+ yards given up.

This team is really building. I wish I could see what it looks like in 2 years.

Hammock Parties 10-24-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11046204)
This team is really building. I wish I could see what it looks like in 2 years.

A 32-year old Alex Smith with no Bowe or Charles.

RunKC 10-24-2014 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Zarth (Post 11046307)
A 32-year old Alex Smith with no Bowe or Charles.

I'm okay with this. Kelce is better than Bowe and Davis isn't too bad himself. DAT looks a nice toy on offense and our GM is showing us he can draft quality players.

O.city 10-24-2014 11:44 AM

Bowe is averaging 15 yards per catch. He needs more tsrgets. Alot more. Will only improve the passing game

RunKC 10-24-2014 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11046309)
Bowe is averaging 15 yards per catch. He needs more tsrgets. Alot more. Will only improve the passing game

Depends. Bowe is good for at least one critical drop a game. Double edged sword on this issue

O.city 10-24-2014 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11046315)
Depends. Bowe is good for at least one critical drop a game. Double edged sword on this issue

Kelce leads the team in drops iirc.

Drops are a convenient excuse. Throw the guy the football more. Get the ball in the hands of our beat playmakers. That's bowe

RunKC 10-24-2014 11:56 AM

I'd consider Charles, Kelce and DAT to be better playmakers than Bowe. If I'm Alex I look to them first.

O.city 10-24-2014 11:57 AM

The bowe hate at this place is comical. He's average 15 yards per catch, alot of that coming in yards after the catch.

Discuss Thrower 10-24-2014 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11046340)
The bowe hate at this place is comical. He's average 15 yards per catch, alot of that coming in yards after the catch.

Best wide receiver KC has had since Otis Taylor.

BigMeatballDave 10-24-2014 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11046340)
The bowe hate at this place is comical. He's average 15 yards per catch, alot of that coming in yards after the catch.

The hate comes from ill-timed drops.

Most recently, that awful one in SF. There is just no excuse for that.

Just too many bad drops. I've defended him a ton, up to this season. Can't do it anymore.

BigMeatballDave 10-24-2014 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11046329)
Kelce leads the team in drops iirc.

I doubt this is accurate. Show me.

Before Sunday, he led the team in receptions.

O.city 10-24-2014 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11046350)
The hate comes from ill-timed drops.

Most recently, that awful one in SF. There is just no excuse for that.

Just too many bad drops. I've defended him a ton, up to this season. Can't do it anymore.

On the next play, kelce dropped an easier pass for a first down. Don't see anyone eating him up for it.

Bowe has had drops. Every wr drops balls. Keep throwing it at them especially bowe, as he's capable of being a monster on the outside

BigMeatballDave 10-24-2014 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11046361)
On the next play, kelce dropped an easier pass for a first down. Don't see anyone eating him up for it.

Bowe has had drops. Every wr drops balls. Keep throwing it at them especially bowe, as he's capable of being a monster on the outside

One guy is an 8 year vet, the other is in his 2nd season. This is a horrible comparison/argument.

Stop making excuses for Bowe. He can be a special player when his head is in it. Bowe isn't getting any better. One thing that Bowe should be great at, but isn't, is high-pointing. I still really like him, but he's pushing it.

O.city 10-24-2014 12:14 PM

Drops are drops.

How many chances has bowe had, with Alex smith to go up and high point the football?

Hammock Parties 10-24-2014 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11046334)
I'd consider Charles, Kelce and DAT to be better playmakers than Bowe.

DAT has done jack shit in the NFL.

Check yourself.

O.city 10-24-2014 12:17 PM

Pardon me, Bowe and kelce are tied for the lead in drops with 3 a piece

The Franchise 10-24-2014 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 11045712)

OL: a wash

You're on crack.

Albert > Fisher
Allen > McGlynn
Hudson 13 < Hudson 14
Schwartz > Fulton
Fisher > Harris

Garcia Bronco 10-24-2014 12:30 PM

I watch a bunch of chiefs football, probably more than some of you on a long time line. This year's team is better than last year. You can tell the defense is better, the run game is better against better competition at this point compared to last.

Your number one obstacle is the conservative nature of Alex Smith. He needs to take more chances to be great enough to win a playoff game.

Go Royals and have a great night

RunKC 10-24-2014 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 11046416)
You're on crack.

Albert > Fisher
Allen > McGlynn
Hudson 13 < Hudson 14
Schwartz > Fulton
Fisher > Harris

Allen is a dumpster fire and Fisher struggled massively last year.

The Franchise 10-24-2014 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11046430)
Allen is a dumpster fire and Fisher struggled massively last year.

Allen last year is still better than McGlynn so far this year.

O.city 10-24-2014 12:43 PM

Harris is a better RT than fisher was and that in itself is depressing

BigMeatballDave 10-24-2014 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 11046437)
Allen last year is still better than McGlynn so far this year.

Both are awful, but yeah McGlynn is worse.

Marcellus 10-24-2014 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 11046418)
I watch a bunch of chiefs football, probably more than some of you on a long time line. This year's team is better than last year. You can tell the defense is better, the run game is better against better competition at this point compared to last.

Your number one obstacle is the conservative nature of Alex Smith. He needs to take more chances to be great enough to win a playoff game.

Go Royals and have a great night

Possibly but I think Reid sticking his head up his ass with the play calling and decision making is a bigger issue.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11046350)
The hate comes from ill-timed drops.

Most recently, that awful one in SF. There is just no excuse for that.

Just too many bad drops. I've defended him a ton, up to this season. Can't do it anymore.

The thing with Bowe is that he's always had terrible drops, its just that in the past he's had more opportunities to make up for them, ie; being targeted much more often.

He's a lot like Brandon Lloyd in that respect, always dropping the gimme and then turns around and pulls a highwire act... like I said a few days ago, his recent lack of production can be laid at Bowe, Smith AND Reids feet, IMHO.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Zarth (Post 11046383)
DAT has done jack shit in the NFL.

Check yourself.

In the big picture, yes.

But theres no denying that just about every time he's touched the ball this year, something good happens... the early returns are BOFFO.

The Franchise 10-24-2014 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11046590)
The thing with Bowe is that he's always had terrible drops, its just that in the past he's had more opportunities to make up for them, ie; being targeted much more often.

He's a lot like Brandon Lloyd in that respect, always dropping the gimme and then turns around and pulls a highwire act... like I said a few days ago, his recent lack of production can be laid at Bowe, Smith AND Reids feet, IMHO.

And I'm fine with this. What bugs the shit out of me is where Smith and Reid are absolved of the problem and it's all Bowe's issue.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 11046613)
And I'm fine with this. What bugs the shit out of me is where Smith and Reid are absolved of the problem and it's all Bowe's issue.

I'm one of those people that really believe its the ultimate team game, you cant blame one without blaming the other.

Bowe is often an inconsistent numbnut.
Smith really needs to start pushing himself/trusting Bowe more.
Reid doesnt put him front and center in the game plan because he isnt Reids guy.

The ****ing guy should have 3-4 touchdowns by now and its everyones fault.

Marcellus 10-24-2014 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11046627)
I'm one of those people that really believe its the ultimate team game, you cant blame one without blaming the other.

Bowe is often an inconsistent numbnut.
Smith really needs to start pushing himself/trusting Bowe more.
Reid doesnt put him front and center in the game plan because he isnt Reids guy.

The ****ing guy should have 3-4 touchdowns by now and its everyones fault.

Odd considering Reid and Dorsey signed him to his big ass contract.

The Franchise 10-24-2014 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11046634)
Odd considering Reid and Dorsey signed him to his big ass contract.

Really? It's not really odd considering they gave Charles a new contract and he gets 7 touches a game in some games.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11046634)
Odd considering Reid and Dorsey signed him to his big ass contract.

He was just about the only option, and I'm sure he came off like the basically good guy I believe him to be during negotiations... I called him a "coach pleaser" back in the offseason and I believe it fits.

Every time a new coach has come in, Bowe (atleast on the surface) has bought in... coach says lose weight, he loses weight, coach says more offseason training, he does more offseason training , coach says we want you to block better, he ups his blocking game etc.

He WANTS to stay in Kansas City it seems, he WANTS to be great it seems, I'm just not sure he always knows how to go about being it... either way, if we can keep him on as #2 next year I'm ALL for it.

He would be the best #2 in the NFL, IMO.

Marcellus 10-24-2014 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 11046666)
Really? It's not really odd considering they gave Charles a new contract and he gets 7 touches a game in some games.

Is that because he isn't "Dorsey's guy"?

LMAO

Marcellus 10-24-2014 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11046678)
He was just about the only option, and I'm sure he came off like the basically good guy I believe him to be during negotiations... I called him a "coach pleaser" back in the offseason and I believe it fits.

Every time a new coach has come in, Bowe (atleast on the surface) has bought in... coach says lose weight, he loses weight, coach says more offseason training, he does more offseason training , coach says we want you to block better, he ups his blocking game etc.

He WANTS to stay in Kansas City it seems, he WANTS to be great it seems, I'm just not sure he always knows how to go about being it... either way, if we can keep him on as #2 next year I'm ALL for it.

He would be the best #2 in the NFL, IMO.

Regardless it doesn't point to Bowe not getting the ball because Dorsey doesn't like him.

TLO 10-24-2014 03:16 PM

This years team is better.

ToxSocks 10-24-2014 03:19 PM

Jeff Allen. Holy shit i forgot about that guy. What was his injury again?

**NVM, Elbow surgery**

CaliforniaChief 10-24-2014 03:26 PM

This team's tougher, IMO. Tougher early schedule, overcoming key injuries, getting used to and comfortable with new system.

We'll get better this year.

I'll be surprised if we aren't in the playoffs again. And I actually like our chances this year, either at Baltimore, Cincinnati, New England, or Buffalo.

Easy 6 10-24-2014 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 11046730)
This team's tougher, IMO. Tougher early schedule, overcoming key injuries, getting used to and comfortable with new system.

We'll get better this year.

I'll be surprised if we aren't in the playoffs again. And I actually like our chances this year, either at Baltimore, Cincinnati, New England, or Buffalo.

Yup.

Last years team found a way to lose last sunday, this new group didnt.

notorious 10-24-2014 03:44 PM

This team is much better and I think they will be a player in the post season.

notorious 10-24-2014 03:45 PM

Didn't we have a billion TO's on defense at this point last year?

keg in kc 10-24-2014 03:50 PM

Better this year so far. We were winning pretty fluky first half of last year, counting on defensive and return touchdowns to win games because the offense was so bad.

MahiMike 10-24-2014 04:16 PM

Defense much improved over last year is the difference. Our WRs were better last year but that's offset with the addition of Kelce. I like this team better.

ViperVisor 10-24-2014 05:16 PM

Defense yards per drive is right about the same which might surprise some but because so many big plays allowed last year inflated it.

Points allowed is higher because no turnover gifts.
3rd most takes in '13.
4th least takes in '14.


Biggest difference this year is the pre-snap penalties cleaned up.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-24-2014 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 11046043)
Anyone who says last year's team is better doesn't know shit about the chiefs

This. That 9-0 means jack-shit. This team has more holes and still manages to scrape by **** hairs.

chiefzilla1501 10-24-2014 05:32 PM

When was the last time Kansas City saw a team that was good in a balanced way?

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-24-2014 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 11046955)
When was the last time Kansas City saw a team that was good in a balanced way?

97, sans Grbac.

There is no question. There is no doubt. There is no debate.

lcarus 10-24-2014 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 11046955)
When was the last time Kansas City saw a team that was good in a balanced way?

If only the Vermeil era defense wasn't so awful. :shake:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.