SI goes full reerun: Caitlyn Jenner to pose nude in SI shoot.
 

Lmao wtf is wrong with this country?

Guess it will be olympic themed. What a great way to represent your country. Im sure the olympics committee ioc or whatever its called is thrilled. Go ahead and point and laugh world we deserve it. :shake:

http://uproxx.com/webculture/caitlyn...s-illustrated/

Just a terrible effin idea. If I still had a sub to that crap mag I would cancel it now.

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO

:Lin::Lin::Lin::Lin::Lin:

GTFO

:facepalm:

I thought we were all on board that Caitlyn Jenner is an amazing beautiful woman who had the exquisite bravery of a beautiful butterfly flying against the wind, and then this s–t flies out of people’s mouths!

Will the medal be hanging around her neck or her cock?

ROFL

So courageous...

https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hp...72426003_n.jpg

JFC

Will it ever end?

Would anyone have a problem if Tyreek Hill beat the shit out of Caitlyn Jenner?

Weathermankupcake.

Uh no thank you ma'm or sir

NOPE!!! Just getting started. I warned everybody who was celebrating this shit.

I'm sensing a lot of sensationalist headlining going on here. The actual quote from people who know is that she will be wearing "nothing but an American flag and her Olympic medal."

It's Sports Illustrated. We're not going to be seeing tits and...not penis...here.

Who in God's Name would want to see that???

"Her" Olympic medal that reads Men's Track.... LMAO...

either,or

its still pathetic

No, her man bits will be shown to terrorize all the innocent children in this world.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

BRUCE will be posing with HIS medal. Got ovaries? A uterus? Didn't think so BRUCE

What the Funk & Wagnalls is going on here?

No ****ing way. Has to be a joke.

I dig it. Good for her

You gonna jerk to it? ROFL

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploa...Cut-It-Out.gif
http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/6-22-2015/1xxvKh.gif

No one knows until it tells us.

Just curious...

If we accept that genes can get ****ed up during birth and create things like achondroplasia, cystic fibrosis, and Down's syndrome, and we accept that genes in utero determine sex, why is it hard to believe that somethings gets twisted and turns what's supposed to be an innie into an outie?

:clap:

Interesting that so many people in this thread have taken a stupid publicity stunt as an opportunity to spout hateful bullshit.

I heard this in the car just now. Spit up Jack and Coke all over my windshield.

At this point, I don't believe she is helping the cause. She's a Kardasian afterall.

i don't think it was cause of the news bruh, youre drunk.

Interesting that anyone in their right mind would find this appealing or acceptable.

SI hasn't been relevant for a schlong time now.

See, that right there is why you don't drink and drive, you'll spill your drink.

HAS THE ENTIRE WORLD GONE BAT SHIT CRAZY!

Not sure if I can fap to this

It's not to me. Furthermore, if someone wants to switch outie to innie or vice versa it's not really that big of a deal. If someone in my personal life were going through a sex change I would refer to them by whatever name they wanted and use the appropriate pronouns, because I would be interacting with them on a regular basis and it makes sense, and I think it would ease the transition for both of us. I don't feel compelled to do that when referring to a public figure - especially someone who has gone out of their way to make the transition as public as they can.Especially someone who was very well known as one gender and hasn't gone through the biological change to the opposite gender yet. So, to me, this person is going to be Bruce Jenner until he goes through that surgery to make herself Caitlyn Jenner. With all of that being said - I have no interest in seeing pictures of him scantily clad in a sports magazine. It would be the equivalent, to me, of being flashed by a transvestite.

Dude. Come on. You haven't even tried yet.

Many trans people never make full transition, either because of finances or because they just don't want to. Doesn't make them less of a person. And what's the harm in using the preferred pronoun simply out of respect for them because they're human beings?

As I said in my personal life I do. When discussing a public figure, no, I'm not going to censor myself.

So if you have two chairs and one you have to sit on and the other you have to eat...

We used to treat people who have gender identity disorder, now we encourage it.

I only have three things to say, short and sweet

:facepalm:

ROFL

:Lin:

Certainly don't find it appealing, but don't know why it's any more unacceptable than what is routinely displayed on magazines. I would guess the revealing nature will be more modest than most such covers.

"treat"

So.....this is the opposite of the swimsuit issue??

We also used to ban interracial marriage, didnt allow women to vote, etc...

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And that worked so well, I wonder why they ever stopped...

No,no its not

I don't find it appealing, but I find it acceptable. Its a free country, and no one is forcing any of us to buy it. Live and let live. It does me no harm at all, or you either for that matter.

I bet Big Smoke pencils a penis in

Soooooooo, am I supposed to applaud this thing showing off it's mangina as a courageous act or....what?

If everyone were over 50,that would be an acceptable response but tge fact is this influences stupid people to think its accepted and wanted and oversexualizes society and destroys the traditional family.

Do you believe in freedom? Or just freedom for people like you?

What I see here is a bunch of insecure men desperate to prove that they aren't gay by being offended over this.

It has nothing to do with the ultimate definition of freedom.
I didn't say to kill him. They are putting it on a nnational magazine so Idiocracy has seeds to grow

Would you?

More power to destroying a traditional family that sees half of marriages end in divorce and more shitty parenting than you can shake a stick at in this country.

Your ability to parent a child has nothing to do with being a heterosexual.


But this is a pretty clear attention grabbing stunt. There is really nothing to be gained by doing this, where I have though some previous actions were to provided knowledge, this simply isn't.

I want no part of Bruce Jenner in a wig posing in an SI photo shoot.
You saying that means it's because I feel the need to prove I'm not gay?

I've been with the same woman since 1980, this hasn't destroyed anything. If this destroys your family then it wasn't very strong to begin with.

The only thing your family is at risk from is you.

If you want no part in it DON'T BUY IT. Problem solved. Outrage unneeded.

imagine being a kid and you have nothing to spank it to

so you have to go steal a mag from your dad or neighbor or something to get your jerk on

you creep around...see a mag ..grab it , tuck it in your pants and run off

you finally get some alone time

you pull out the mag and start jerking and realize its a dude


are you all in at that point?

It takes balls to pose nude for Sports Illustrated.

Is this 1985 and there is no internet?

So I'm not feeling the need to prove I'm not gay? Got it, thanks. You should probably retract that ridiculous assessment.

ROFL

NSFW tag please. Gross.

You should probably stop being offended by everything.

Feel free to point out where I said I was offended. If anything, you seem to be the one offended by views that differ from yours.

Quite a bit different than stigmatizing the rendering of aid to people who are suffering from a mental illness.

Well......it's not like he's ruining a yearbook photo...:D

You felt the need to post saying you want nothing to do with Bruce Jenner posing in SI because you WEREN'T offended?