8 waived
 

http://www.chiefs.com/news/article-2...8?sf34545892=1


Chiefs Waive Eight Players
Posted 24 minutes ago

PR Staff
Kansas City Chiefs Public Relations
Official Press Release
Email @ChiefsPR
The Kansas City Chiefs announced on Sunday that the club has waived eight players. Each team is required to be down to 75 players by 3 p.m. on Aug. 30. The league’s final roster cutdown to 53 players must take place before 3 p.m. on Sept. 3. Below is a look at the club’s moves.

WAIVED

Player | Pos. | Ht. | Wt. | College | Hometown

Bryce Cheek | DB | 6-0 | 195 | Akron | Lewis Center, Ohio

Niko Davis | DL | 6-5 | 285 | Liberty | Buffalo, N.Y.

Curtis Feigt | OL | 6-6 | 310 | West Virginia | Mercersburg, Pa.

Malcolm Jackson | CB | 5-11 | 180 | Charleston Southern | Sugar Hill, Ga.

Seantavius Jones | WR | 6-3 | 200 | Valdosta State | Tucker, Ga.

Jonathan Massaquoi | LB | 6-2 | 264 | Troy | Lawrenceville, Ga.

Kashif Moore | WR | 5-9 | 180 | Connecticut | Burlington, N.J.

Drew Nowak | C | 6-3 | 292 | Western Michigan | Green Bay, Wis.

No surprises thus far.

Nothing worth noting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't expect to see any surprise cuts to get to 75. The bottom 15 aren't really on the bubble. They're on the outside looking in.

Who I want to see on the list next time is Carr, Wilson and Fleming.

Down to 80/81 now with trade and Berry added?

still got another easy 17 cuts, then it's gets harder

44 Adams, Tyrell LB 6-2 228 24 1 West Georgia
1 Carr, Deveron DB 5-11 194 26 2 Arizona State
77 Devey, Jordan OL 6-6 320 28 2 Memphis
30 Fleming, Jamell DB 5-11 206 27 5 Oklahoma
69 Fragel, Reid OL 6-8 308 25 1 Ohio State
85 Hammond, Frankie WR 6-1 184 26 3 Florida
39 Johnson, Jeron DB 5-10 212 28 5 Boise State
83 Mathews, Mitch WR 6-5 222 R Brigham Young
65 Mayweather, Garrick OL 6-2 319 R Fordham
40 Millard, Trey FB 6-2 247 25 2 Oklahoma
40 Mulumba, Andy LB 6-3 260 26 3 Eastern Michigan
82 Parker, Brian TE 6-4 265 24 2 Albany
47 Randolph, Shakiel DB 6-3 213 R Southern Methodist
62 Smith, Terrance LB 6-2 235 23 R Florida State
94 Staten, Jimmy DL 6-3 311 25 1 Middle Tennessee State
74 Sterup, Zach OL 6-9 318 R Nebraska
41 Winchester, James SP 6-3 240 27 2 Oklahoma

Malcolm Jackson will see that hail mary pass for the rest of his life.

I think there's a chance Hammond makes the team.

Also, they aren't going to cut their lone long snapper.

No Dee Ford?

I don't even know who their long snapper is this year. LMAO

Bah ... Hammond is a JAG and to make it even worse, he's a special teams JAG.

There has to be a guy with more potential that can learn/play special teams.

Winchester

Hammond is basically Terrence Copper with punt return skills. They'll probably keep DAT over Hammond but DAT is made of glass so they may go that way instead. They need someone to back up Hill in the returns.

ROFL:clap:

If they cut Winchester, they'll have to pick up a long snapper somewhere on the waiver wire.

You're cutting our long snapper?

keep them on the twitter feed or dump them?

dam,dam,dam

i got it ... i'm sorry,i'm sorry

Winchester can stay!!

ROFL

HE'S OUR LONG SNAPPER!

I understand that a lot of people don't hate on Hammond (which quite honestly, I don't get) but he has value as a returner/receiver so I hope that if they part ways with him, they can get a pick in return.

Guys like Hammond are a dime a dozen in this league.

Him getting cut would be a good sign for this team in terms of quality at the WR position.

I think it's funny that a user named 'chop' started a thread concerning cuts.

No, they're not.

His punt return average is one of the best in the league and better than DAT's.

His kick/punt coverage is also good.

While he probably doesn't make the Chiefs 53, he has value and IMO, more value that Albert ****ing Wilson and DAT, because DAT can't stay healthy,

He'll help a team in 2016.

Out of that list, I was hoping Massaquoi could amount to something.. but nope. nbd

They will keep guys that are more about special teams than potential at their position. DAT is an okay returner/receiver (when healthy) but doesn't play on the coverage team, afaik. Wilson doesn't add anything to STs. It wouldn't shock me to see Hammond make the team over either (note - I am not pushing for the idea; just making observations).

It surprised me that Massaquoi showed absolutely nothing. I remember him making some plays in a reserve role in Atlanta.

I strongly dislike Wilson. If we want to talk about JAG's, he's the perfect example.

I'd take DAT, Hammond and Brown over Wilson.

I'm not a fan at all.

I'm also starting to think they may try to get Robinson onto the PS.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, my adopt a Chief Seantavius Jones!!! Only the good die young.

Much like Russell, he didn't earn a spot on the 53, IMO.

You shut your whore mouth.

Another shitty golden domer in the NFL.

Shocked.

It's not like Wilson had more yards than the 3 of them combined or anything.
Posted via Mobile Device

What is your obsession with Hammond? He adds no value as a receiver, and he's average at best as a returner.

Because his 434 total career yards is better than Albert Wilson's 451 receiving yards last year. Duh.
Posted via Mobile Device

Zach sterup will prolly be stashed after his suspension. The coaching staff likes him.

I just cant hate on Hammond he isnt flashy but he catches the ball and moves up field makes positive yards and doesnt put it on the ground. He isnt bad in ST coverage either. If he gets cut and I kinda think he sticks but if so he will be employed very quikly by another team.

Obsession?

:facepalm:

I said he has more *value* due to his ability to return kicks and punts.

Always the condescending dipshit with zero rebuttal.

Billay has more value than you.

...and yet Alex Smith remains.

451 receiving yards last year vs. 434 all purpose yards in a whole career

Hmmm which is better. It's tough.
Posted via Mobile Device

Obviously, you don't watch or know football.

No surprise for anyone that's read your worthless posts.

Billay has more value than you.

Thanks!

Watching Sterup the last 4 years all I can say is damn what a frustrating player.

So Hammond offers more what? Tell me what I need to what or know about football to understand his value.
Posted via Mobile Device

**** off.

Do you own homework, ****ball.

You might be the most worthless 40,000+ post member of this forum.

You have ZERO football IQ and can NEVER make a logical argument.

I'm trying to make an argument hence me comparing both of their yards. If you stop acting like a 8 year old who just learned how to curse for the first time, maybe we could get somewhere.
Posted via Mobile Device

:facepalm:

Jesus Christ, you asshole. Do you just make it your mission every day to shit on everyone and everything in this forum that doesn't agree with you?

Do this place a favor and just leave like you said you were going to do years ago.

**** off, Claynus. There's a big difference between leaving and being banned.

You're a pathetic piece of shit, just like your boy Hootie.

Your life sucks and all you have is CP.

I'd feel sorry for you if you weren't a ****y assed troll.

No such luck, loser.

I don't know who any of those guys are.

LMAO

I spent almost the entire weekend hanging out with my gf and her family, you douche.

You spent the weekend shitting on people on here and had twice as many posts as I did, easily.

Eat shit.

Good freaking grief.

I feel sorry for all of those involved.

Yeah, no one likes you shitting on everyone. You made like 170 posts in two days. Congrats!

Says the guy with 504 posts. Noob.

I can't even imagine making 170 posts in two days. My meager post count is proof that I have a rich and fulfilling life. :D

For the record, I was one of the friends Dane was thankful for before he left forever

I must say I'm pretty happy for you and your Lady. No better feeling in the world.

Dick

Everyone is a misnomer. Only the butt****ing morons like yourself are beneficiaries of my "negative" posts.

Also, there was a game yesterday and since I can't access the chat room from my iPad, I posted in the game thread.

I still have 140,000 less posts than you.

PS - You're still a childless, brokeass, dumbass, loser.

I pity the family you're about to join.

LMAO Holy crap that's funny.

Keep moving those goalposts.

PS - kids aren't for everyone but I pity anyone that inherited your "complete ****ing asshole" genetics

Assholes rule the world

Guys that can't get laid until they're in the 30's don't.

you're king shit of **** mountain

You can only dream

It is possible to have a football discussion with Dane and even disagree with him. I have been doing it in several conversations. I have disagreed with him a few times and have agreed with him on other points. Not once have either of us called each other names or cussed at the other. Maybe Dane isn't the problem. I have seen him jump pretty hard on you Clay. And a couple of others. But for the most part, you had it coming by your history of being abrasive. Just try discussing your opinion. Respect what other people believe, and don't belabor it. This board will be a much more pleasant experience for all of us if you do.

Dane is a douche to almost anyone who disagrees with him. It's established fact on this forum. It's practically his modus operandi. And he's ****ing proud of it.

You don't even have to be in a discussion with him. You can be watching a game on TV, make an idle comment, and he comes in and ****ing savages your post with a chainsaw, taking personal shots, even.

He's scum. I regret ever engaging him because he brings out my nasty side. I can only take so much of this ****stick.

Take your shot now, you california raisin. You know you can't resist. ****ing douche it up, champ.

I'm late as heck now, but maybe obsession is a strong word.

I just know that anytime Hammond and cuts come up in the same sentence, you swoop in with all of these (barely arguable) reasons why he's valuable and can't be cut.

I don't see it, man. As someone mentioned, he's good in punt/kick coverage....but that's about the extent of his contribution. And over say that he has value as a receiver (which you did) is laughable.

If they cut Wislon it is good news for the Chiefs, he has made some good plays but .. some plays its like come on lay out and get grass stains and dirt in your face mask, sacrifice for the catch.

I just dont see them doing it though,

Wilson would be a great #4 and a serviceable #3. Cutting him wouldn't be the best idea.

Just roll with Maclin, Conley, Wilson, Hill, Robinson and maybe Streater if they keep 6 and get this show on the road.

Those plays where he doesn't lay out piss me off too, but at this point only Maclin is for sure better out of the wide receivers. All the others had less yards combined last year than Wilson. Conley looks better and that's why he is getting #2 WR snaps. All others though, it's debatable at best. There's a reason Wilson is still playing with the first team as the slot.
Posted via Mobile Device

.

Imagine him saying it with Mr. T's voice.