ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Grade the Marcus Peters situation (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314130)

DaFace 02-26-2018 01:11 PM

Grade the Marcus Peters situation
 
Might as well document our overall reaction.

TimeForWasp 02-26-2018 01:12 PM

in before poll

carcosa 02-26-2018 01:12 PM

F-

cmh6476 02-26-2018 01:12 PM

In

Mother****erJones 02-26-2018 01:12 PM

F but I’ll say that Veach probably did the best he could under the circumstances

Rain Man 02-26-2018 01:14 PM

Put the damn poll up so I can give it the worst grade possible. And would you please have a response category that is 'worst grade possible, and I wish there was a worse grade than that so I could pick that one instead'?

DaFace 02-26-2018 01:15 PM

Dammit. Left off Clark Hunt. Oh well. He can be the pissed off options.

smithandrew051 02-26-2018 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13439316)
F but I’ll say that Veach probably did the best he could under the circumstances

I’ll agree with this. You can’t blame the dentist for your root canal hurting when you refused to brush for 3 years.

siberian khatru 02-26-2018 01:17 PM

I gave F's to everyone

Sassy Squatch 02-26-2018 01:17 PM

Fs for all except Veach, who most likely did the absolute best he could given the shit hand he was dealt.

Rasputin 02-26-2018 01:20 PM

WTF. It's a bullshit trade not getting the second round pick till 2019 is horseshit.

Iczer 02-26-2018 01:21 PM

****ing sickening.

Rasputin 02-26-2018 01:22 PM

Could have handled Peters better during the season thats lack of leadership on Andy Reid part.

Rain Man 02-26-2018 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 13439336)
I gave F's to everyone

I hope you remember to check off all of the little angry boxes, too.

BryanBusby 02-26-2018 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13439316)
F but I’ll say that Veach probably did the best he could under the circumstances

Yep. Without knowing if he had direct orders to get rid of him immediately or not (I assume he did), I think he did the best he could. The rest of this, woof.

Rain Man 02-26-2018 01:23 PM

The only good thing about this is that there are no Rams fans, so no one will come to Chiefsplanet and gloat.

Iczer 02-26-2018 01:30 PM

I'd rather have kept Peters and picked up his 5th year option. Make his ****ing ass earn his new contract on a new team or lose money for himself. Instead of KC getting fleeced and putting us in a horrible position defensively.

Molitoth 02-26-2018 01:37 PM

I don't blame Veach... this came down from Reid/Hunt.

BlackHelicopters 02-26-2018 01:41 PM

No Clark’s?
Poll fail.

Shoes 02-26-2018 01:42 PM

Tough situation- don't blame Veach at all since I think its safe to assume that this situation deteriorated much worse than we knew.

Unfortunate that Reid couldn't reign Peters in more, unfortunate Peters couldn't be more mature in this situation. I don't blame Dorsey either, I think they knew what type of individual you were getting when you drafted Marcus Peters.

The juice was worth the squeeze until this season I suppose.

In58men 02-26-2018 01:47 PM

“Package of picks” ROFL

We only got two

****ING WEAK

Stinger 02-26-2018 01:51 PM

Talk to me when the season is over and we can discuss the results. Don't really care about hypothetical of what may or may not come. It happened lets see what the actual result will be before I fly off the handle.

wazu 02-26-2018 01:52 PM

I wish we had gotten more, but hard to grade as an “F”. Worst case it appears we at least got a team cancer and distraction out of the locker room. And as Kaep has demonstrated, market value of an anthem sitter/kneeler is dramatically lower than an equivalent player who stands.

Mecca 02-26-2018 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stinger (Post 13439462)
Talk to me when the season is over and we can discuss the results. Don't really care about hypothetical of what may or may not come. It happened lets see what the actual result will be before I fly off the handle.

That's gonna look even worse man, behind their pass rush he's probably gonna be a first team all pro.

Chiefnj2 02-26-2018 01:52 PM

Wouldn't the best situation have been to keep Marcus another year at his rookie cheap ass rate and tell him "We can't get shit for you with your baggage. Keep it together for the season and then try to cash in as a FA".

The Franchise 02-26-2018 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13439471)
Wouldn't the best situation have been to keep Marcus another year at his rookie cheap ass rate and tell him "We can't get shit for you with your baggage. Keep it together for the season and then try to cash in as a FA".

They apparently didn’t want him around the locker room.

Mecca 02-26-2018 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13439471)
Wouldn't the best situation have been to keep Marcus another year at his rookie cheap ass rate and tell him "We can't get shit for you with your baggage. Keep it together for the season and then try to cash in as a FA".

You'd think but apparently we had to do this now just cause.

Fish 02-26-2018 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13439471)
Wouldn't the best situation have been to keep Marcus another year at his rookie cheap ass rate and tell him "We can't get shit for you with your baggage. Keep it together for the season and then try to cash in as a FA".

Yeah, I don't get it. If there was seriously that little interest, then suck it up and make it work through the rest of his contract. Forcing this trade benefits nobody but Peters. The Chiefs just showed every player in the league that if they want out of a Chiefs contract, all they have to do is act like an asshole.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13439338)
Fs for all except Veach, who most likely did the absolute best he could given the shit hand he was dealt.

That's bullshit. Veach absolutely doesn't have to trade him now. Somebody is going to have a CB go down and will salivate at the thought of an all-pro, cheap replacement.

Mecca 02-26-2018 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13439487)
Yeah, I don't get it. If there was seriously that little interest, then suck it up and make it work through the rest of his contract. Forcing this trade benefits nobody but Peters. The Chiefs just showed every player in the league that if they want out of a Chiefs contract, all they have to do is act like an asshole.

Unless of course people were cancelling tickets and citing him as the reason, can't have that.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 01:59 PM

It's Fs across the board.

They drafted the guy knowing that he imploded at Washington.

Reid managed to reel him in at the end of 2016, but still decreed he was not worth the effort when his talent clearly is.

Peters has blown up his chances at TWO of his last two stops despite his immense talent.

The trade haul was downright pathetic. I'd rather them just play Peters two more years and let him walk.

Nothing but F's for me. Period.

Edit: Forgot to include Clark Hunt, who refused to stand aside a player exercising his 1st amendment rights completely peacefully. F F F F F F F.

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13439495)
It's Fs across the board.

They drafted the guy knowing that he blew up at Washington.

Reid managed to reel him in at the end of 2016, but still decreed he was not worth the effort when his talent clearly is.

Peters has blown up his chances at TWO of his last two stops despite his immense talent.

The trade haul was downright pathetic. I'd rather them just play Peters two more years and let him walk.

Nothing but F's for me. Period.

Go back to that draft, there isn't a better pick, there's no one you can go "we coulda had" all the guys taken after him are far worse players.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 02:01 PM

Thank God the Chiefs got Mahomes. If they had re-upped with Alex and done this trade, I'm not sure how much longer I would have cared.

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoes (Post 13439442)
Tough situation- don't blame Veach at all since I think its safe to assume that this situation deteriorated much worse than we knew.

Unfortunate that Reid couldn't reign Peters in more, unfortunate Peters couldn't be more mature in this situation. I don't blame Dorsey either, I think they knew what type of individual you were getting when you drafted Marcus Peters.

The juice was worth the squeeze until this season I suppose.

That means you basically think Clark Hunt demanded he be traded if you say it's not Veach's fault.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:01 PM

I'm not going to "Grade" this trade until at least 2020.

The Chiefs have an opportunity to draft two players that can contribute immediately in their respective draft years and if that happens, it'll lessen the loss of a talented but troubled person.

Eleazar 02-26-2018 02:02 PM

The only way I could dislike this more would be if he had been traded to St. Louis.



Kidding, but really...

Although I think we kind of got hosed in the deal, if you can't resign him to a long term deal then taking what you can get for him is the right move. It's Peters' fault that his behavior depressed his market value, not Chunt/Reid/Veach.

The lesson learned is to take what you can get, and don't draft people of low character in the future.

Stinger 02-26-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439469)
That's gonna look even worse man, behind their pass rush he's probably gonna be a first team all pro.

Maybe or he goes berserk in LA and looses favor. Either way we will then have knowledge of how this actually played out. IF the chiefs loose Peters and make the playoffs via division winner or wildcard is it still a loose/loose for the Chiefs if Peter's does well in LA? So many extra factors will have taken place that we can then go forward as to what type of trade this was. On the surface it seems one way, but in the NFL sometimes it plays out other times the massive deals don't workout. We will see and I am sure we will be reminded of it here (often) either way it plays out.

Jerm 02-26-2018 02:02 PM

F's all the way around...complete and utter abomination.

Have no idea why you trade him now to begin with...would've waited until the draft or after and see if anyone else would've bit if they missed out on a CB target.

This entire thing is insanity.

Sorce 02-26-2018 02:02 PM

I think it was probably the ****in clarks, I hope his fake ass hair catches on fire.

Sassy Squatch 02-26-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439493)
That's bullshit. Veach absolutely doesn't have to trade him now. Somebody is going to have a CB go down and will salivate at the thought of an all-pro, cheap replacement.

I believe Reid wanted him gone right away.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439469)
That's gonna look even worse man, behind their pass rush he's probably gonna be a first team all pro.

I think you can go ahead and pencil that in. He's going to be a stud in LA.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439498)
Go back to that draft, there isn't a better pick, there's no one you can go "we coulda had" all the guys taken after him are far worse players.

No doubt. Peters was a steal.

A steal that leaves our team for relative peanuts 3 years later.

I'd rather have a very talented player at 18 who could contribute for a decade.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439518)
I think you can go ahead and pencil that in. He's going to be a stud in LA.

HE WAS A STUD HERE.

I know you're not denying that, but WHAT THE ACTUAL **** ARE WE DOING.

Graystoke 02-26-2018 02:04 PM

I got better grades in High School.

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:04 PM

Do you know how many times guys demand to be traded this time of year and end up staying with that team? Marcus Peters didn't have the money leverage to actually hold out.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13439515)
I believe Reid wanted him gone right away.

So? Put on your big boy pants and explain the economics of the situation.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13439520)
HE WAS A STUD HERE.

I know you're not denying that, but WHAT THE ACTUAL **** ARE WE DOING.

If this is the actual compensation, Veach is derelict in doing his job.

Fish 02-26-2018 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439500)
Thank God the Chiefs got Mahomes. If they had re-upped with Alex and done this trade, I'm not sure how much longer I would have cared.

Can you imagine this place if they would have given Alex an extension, then followed it up with this Peters trade?

LMAO... :fire:

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439530)
If this is the actual compensation, Veach is derelict in doing his job.

If you believe he can pull that Alex Smith deal but then do this one the only thing that makes sense is he was told to get rid of Peters no matter what, that kinda kills any negotiating power.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439530)
If this is the actual compensation, Veach is derelict in doing his job.

Absolutely, man. Absolutely. This is just asinine.

Reid REELED PETERS IN after the suspension last year. Berry will be on the field in 2018, and is far more suited to reeling in Peters than someone like Houston or Parker.

And honestly you can just live with it. You can live with the really dumb shit he does for another two years, three if you want to tag him. After that you let him walk and you get a 3rd out of it. I'd rather take a 2020 3rd + two more years of Marcus Peters than a 2018 4th + 2019 2nd + no Marcus Peters.

And you never know if teams will be willing to pay us more down the road.

THIS JUST SO DAMN STUPID.

GOD.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439543)
If you believe he can pull that Alex Smith deal but then do this one the only thing that makes sense is he was told to get rid of Peters no matter what, that kinda kills any negotiating power.

Alex Smith had at least 6 teams calling for him.

Peters only really had 1.

That's on Peters.

It's also on Veach for even entertaining this terrible deal.

It's on Dorsey for wanting to pull the trigger on an insane person in 2015.

It's on Reid who said "this guy's going to be tough but worth it" to Dorsey than being unwilling to continue reeling him in.

It's on Hunt for refusing to support Peters and likely caving to STH's who are crying themselves to sleep because a black guy is peacefully protesting.

It's on everybody at One Arrowhead Drive. They all failed this team.

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:14 PM

The only way when you see this is all your gonna get back in a trade and don't say "ok nevermind not moving on that" is if you have to trade him, you can't say no.

Chiefnj2 02-26-2018 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13439546)
Absolutely, man. Absolutely. This is just asinine.

Reid REELED PETERS IN after the suspension last year..

Unless Peters reeled Peters in based on the promise of a trade.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439561)
The only way when you see this is all your gonna get back in a trade and don't say "ok nevermind not moving on that" is if you have to trade him, you can't say no.

Or if you really do this is what's best for the team.

Let's not excuse Veach in this, please. He's the one that pulled the trigger.

Unless the team wants to tell us who is responsible for this, and they won't, they all take it.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13439575)
Unless Peters reeled Peters in based on the promise of a trade.

Shrug.

They won't tell us anything, so we have to figure it out.

Mother****erJones 02-26-2018 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13439360)
Yep. Without knowing if he had direct orders to get rid of him immediately or not (I assume he did), I think he did the best he could. The rest of this, woof.

That’s what makes all of this speculative on our part for most of this, we weren’t around Marcus 24/7. We only know what we watched and what was reported aka coach altercation. At least we got a 2nd out of this. It’s next year but I’ll take it given the circumstances

threebag 02-26-2018 02:20 PM

At least there's always the Browns, right?

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439530)
If this is the actual compensation, Veach is derelict in doing his job.

This might be the dumbest comment I've read about the compensation.

31 other teams had an opportunity to trade for Marcus Peters for a 4th round pick this year and only ONE made the deal.

Think about that:


The Vikings, who already have a great defense, passed on him.

The Eagles, the defending Super Bowl champs, passed on him.

The Saints, whose defense turned a corner this year but lost to the Vikings passed on him.

The Falcons, who have a good defense but would have clearly upgraded with Peters passed on him.

The Green Bay Packers, who need a shit ton of help on defense, passed on him.

The Bears, led by Matt Nagy, who are likely to lose Kyle Fuller to Free Agency, passed on him.

Many, many Super Bowl contenders passed on Peters. Hell, the Eagles gave up a 4th round pick for Jay Ajayi, but wouldn't give up a 4th for Peters.

Only one team wanted this guy.

One.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439592)
This might be the dumbest comment I've read about the compensation.

31 other teams had an opportunity to trade for Marcus Peters for a 4th round pick this year and only ONE made the deal.

Think about that: The Vikings, who already have a great defense, passed on him.

The Eagles, the defending Super Bowl champs, passed on him.

The Saints, whose defense turned a corner this year but lost to the Vikings passed on him.

The Falcons, who have a good defense but would have clearly upgraded with Peters passed on him.

The Green Bay Packers, who need a shit ton of help on defense, passed on him.

The Bears, led by Matt Nagy, who are likely to lose Kyle Fuller to Free Agency, passed on him.

Many, many Super Bowl contenders passed on Peters. Hell, the Eagles gave up a 4th round pick for Jay Ajayi, but wouldn't give up a 4th for Peters.

Only one team wanted this guy. One.

Soooooooo let's enter into negotiations with a team when we have no leverage.

Tell me Dane: which do you want.

OPTION A

2018 4th
2019 2nd
no Marcus Peters

OPTION B
2 more years of Marcus Peters
2020 3rd

I know you said you're withholding judgement, which is honestly the only fair reaction, but Option B seems so much better than A it's hilarious.

threebag 02-26-2018 02:23 PM

The compensation hits you in the feels, but glad we passed on him too.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13439597)
Soooooooo let's enter into negotiations with a team when we have no leverage.

Tell me Dane: which do you want.

OPTION A

2018 4th
2019 2nd
no Marcus Peters

OPTION B
2 more years of Marcus Peters
2020 3rd

I know you said you're withholding judgement, which is honestly the only fair reaction, but Option B seems so much better than A it's hilarious.

You're assuming that Option B would be Drama-Free.

That's clearly incorrect.

Direckshun 02-26-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439603)
You're assuming that Option B would be Drama-Free.

That's clearly incorrect.

I'm assuming a continuation of 100% of the behavior we've had from the past 2 years.

I still take B all day.

All day.

threebag 02-26-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13439597)
Soooooooo let's enter into negotiations with a team when we have no leverage.

Tell me Dane: which do you want.

OPTION A

2018 4th
2019 2nd
no Marcus Peters

OPTION B
2 more years of HELL WITH Marcus Peters
2020 3rd

I know you said you're withholding judgement, which is honestly the only fair reaction, but Option B seems so much better than A it's hilarious.

.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13439606)
I'm assuming a continuation of 100% of the behavior we've had from the past 2 years.

I still take B all day.

All day.

That's because you haven't personally dealt with him on a daily basis for the last 3 years.

You, like so many others, are looking at this situation as if it was in a vacuum.

It's not.

BryanBusby 02-26-2018 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13439589)
That’s what makes all of this speculative on our part for most of this, we weren’t around Marcus 24/7. We only know what we watched and what was reported aka coach altercation. At least we got a 2nd out of this. It’s next year but I’ll take it given the circumstances

In football sense, I would of taken the gamble. Teams miss out on a big CB in the draft or they lose a starter in camp.

IMO at worst, they were getting a later on 3rd round comp. I don't think the trade moved the needle to feel pressed to do this today.

I can't help but think this is happening now because fat **** Chiefs fans, that haven't seen their own dicks since Montana, sent emails to Clark because his knee made contact with grass.

lcarus 02-26-2018 02:27 PM

https://i.imgur.com/GfZNVZb.gif

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439592)
This might be the dumbest comment I've read about the compensation.

31 other teams had an opportunity to trade for Marcus Peters for a 4th round pick this year and only ONE made the deal.

Think about that:


The Vikings, who already have a great defense, passed on him.

The Eagles, the defending Super Bowl champs, passed on him.

The Saints, whose defense turned a corner this year but lost to the Vikings passed on him.

The Falcons, who have a good defense but would have clearly upgraded with Peters passed on him.

The Green Bay Packers, who need a shit ton of help on defense, passed on him.

The Bears, led by Matt Nagy, who are likely to lose Kyle Fuller to Free Agency, passed on him.

Many, many Super Bowl contenders passed on Peters. Hell, the Eagles gave up a 4th round pick for Jay Ajayi, but wouldn't give up a 4th for Peters.

Only one team wanted this guy.

One.

So, you don't trade him now. I can't imagine the market for a cheap, talented CB is going to get worse.

RINGLEADER 02-26-2018 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 13439355)
Could have handled Peters better during the season thats lack of leadership on Andy Reid part.

Andy Reid is a bozo coach who will never win anything.

Fully expect him to be gone in two years while Pederson and Nagy play in the NFC Championship game.

This is the equivalent of losing a playoff game after being up by 18 points in the second half.

carcosa 02-26-2018 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 13439607)
.

yeah, benefitting from the best 3 year start to a CB's career has really been hell

carcosa 02-26-2018 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 13439625)
Andy Reid is a bozo coach who will never win anything.

Fully expect him to be gone in two years while Pederson and Nagy play in the NFC Championship game.

This is the equivalent of losing a playoff game after being up by 18 points in the second half.

Andy Reid ****ing sucks

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439624)
So, you don't trade him now. I can't imagine the market for a cheap, talented CB is going to get worse.

:facepalm:

You forgot the part about him being volatile

Fish 02-26-2018 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439592)
This might be the dumbest comment I've read about the compensation.

31 other teams had an opportunity to trade for Marcus Peters for a 4th round pick this year and only ONE made the deal.

Think about that:


The Vikings, who already have a great defense, passed on him.

The Eagles, the defending Super Bowl champs, passed on him.

The Saints, whose defense turned a corner this year but lost to the Vikings passed on him.

The Falcons, who have a good defense but would have clearly upgraded with Peters passed on him.

The Green Bay Packers, who need a shit ton of help on defense, passed on him.

The Bears, led by Matt Nagy, who are likely to lose Kyle Fuller to Free Agency, passed on him.

Many, many Super Bowl contenders passed on Peters. Hell, the Eagles gave up a 4th round pick for Jay Ajayi, but wouldn't give up a 4th for Peters.

Only one team wanted this guy.

One.

If the compensation wasn't adequate, then the Chiefs should have just kept him for the remainder of the contract. We're talking about arguably the best Chiefs cornerback in history, with more INTs over the last 3 years than anyone else in the NFL. On a cheap rookie contract. It's perfectly justifiable to put up with some attitude when you're getting that kind of return on the field. The Chiefs pussed out and allowed themselves to get bent over hard. While showing every player in the league that if you're not happy as a Chief, just act like a douche and you'll get your way.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439632)
:facepalm:

Sure, just release him instead and get nothing

Why? Peters has no leverage here. The Chiefs don't have to do anything. Peters is under contract.

Oddly, yours may actually be the stupidest comment in this thread.

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:31 PM

He hasn't made enough money to even hold out at this point.

threebag 02-26-2018 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13439626)
yeah, benefitting from the best 3 year start to a CB's career has really been hell

His talent on the field seems to be his only positive (less awesome tackling) everything else appears to be shit, ya feel me?

Fish 02-26-2018 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439632)
:facepalm:

You forgot the part about him being volatile

No, keep him and get one of the best shut down corners in the league for another 2 years. Who cares if he's volatile. 2 years of shutdown corner is worth the bad behavior. The coaches and personnel get paid enough to handle volatile. Peters is hardly the first NFL star with a bad attitude.

Jerm 02-26-2018 02:34 PM

What would've been the problem with holding on to him until draft day or after....even into training camp.

A team misses out on a draft target, injuries, etc. and who knows what you get.

Trading him this early makes absolutely no ****ing sense.

alpha_omega 02-26-2018 02:34 PM

I checked the angry boxes, but i'll give the trade an "M".

...For Mahomes....'cause without that...Peters or not, its still the same thing....6/one-half dozen/the other.

threebag 02-26-2018 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439641)
He hasn't made enough money to even hold out at this point.

So keep the distractions on the field?

carcosa 02-26-2018 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 13439643)
His talent on the field seems to be his only positive (less awesome tackling) everything else appears to be shit, ya feel me?

talent on the field would seem to be the most important thing when it comes to winning football games, which I believe is an NFL team's primary objective


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.