Rookies get their numbers!
 

This is always an exciting time for me. Think of the possibilities!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">🚨 ROOKIE NUMBERS 🚨 <a href="https://t.co/EYnTQP5R59">pic.twitter.com/EYnTQP5R59</a></p>&mdash; Kansas City Chiefs (@Chiefs) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs/status/1124694491624026119?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 4, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

4 of 6 rookies also signed there contracts!

Thornhill and Saunders unsigned

****!!!!! What's taking so long???????

I'm very ignorant about rookie contracts, I thought they amount they received was fixed by draft slot, so what are they negotiating?

Certain things can be negotiated. I have no idea what but I know certain things can

Very good article by Mahomes agent

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.for...-contract/amp/

PAAAAAAANNNIIIICCC

𝙁𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 chris Jones now Thornhill and Saunders.... **** you Veach!!

And he’s going to cut Hill too!!!!!

**** YOU!!!!!!!!!

Gonna fly a banner soon!

Only interested in who wears 69.

Soon to be The Sausage

Jared Allen probably paid someone to keep it off the books

I like the 99 choice for some reason

Aaron Donald and JJ Watt

If he decides to come out of retirement and if, for whatever reason, he signs with us, The Gronk

Well since he’s a Chief it’ll be more like Aldon Smith.

Those are pretty much perfect numbers. This team knows its stuff.

Rookie John Lovett is listed as a TE. Logan Parker gone

Doesn't Watts wear #25?

Not anymore lol

Reid says Darwin Thompson reminds him of Charcandrick West

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Khalen Saunders says he likes the No. 99 because he looks up to Aaron Donald, who paved the way for short defensive linemen, like himself. Both are 6’0&quot;</p>&mdash; Pete Sweeney (@pgsween) <a href="https://twitter.com/pgsween/status/1124733282778779649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 4, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">After a few minutes chatting with <a href="https://twitter.com/khalenNOTkaylen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@khalenNOTkaylen</a>, there’s little doubt that he’d love to go by the nickname of “Tarzan” moving forward. <br><br>Fav movie, spoke about the soundtrack, said it fits him perfectly. Beast.</p>&mdash; BJ Kissel (@ChiefsReporter) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsReporter/status/1124732523358171136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 4, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Disney animated, "Northman" iteration, or Christopher Lambert's Greystoke?

Okafor was listed as #99. Now it belongs to Saunders. I’m wondering if he clawed #57 away from Breeland Speaks?

Is it too much to ask for ONE cool wide receiver we get to wear a number 80s?

THE 80S ARE THE COOL WIDE RECEIVER NUMBERS

I said something similar a couple weeks ago. Never thought we’d be that team. It’s a very NFC thing to do.

My favorite number is 84 and the Chiefs have never had a cool 84. Buncha shitty TE’s.

Was coming in here to say these two very things. Was really hoping Hardman was going to get 80 or 84.

Now that you mention it, Hardman does seem like an 84.

I feel like you have to be at least 6'1 to use the 80s as a WR.

I always imagine them as lengthy, strong, and having really ****ing good hands. The kind that make circus catches on the regular.

Darwin Thompson took #25? Kind of surprising. Would hope that number is no longer available in a few years.

The ghost of Jeff Criswell.

Thornhill had a nice INT off of TJ Linta today. Thornhill forgot he’s in the NFL now and can run when no one touches you

From BJ Kissel

Steve Spagnuolo—the new defensive coordinator—spent a lot of time talking with the defensive backs and explaining what he was looking for on every play. There was a huge emphasis put on the smaller details of what the guys were doing in coverage and where they were dropping in their coverages.