ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Why is Marrone going with N.Foles as his QB instead of G.Minshew?? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=326498)

TripleThreat 11-05-2019 07:53 PM

Why is Marrone going with N.Foles as his QB instead of G.Minshew??
 
Gardner Minshews 2019 stats :

Year 1 : Rookie
Yards : 2,285
Percentage : 61.2
Touchdowns : 13
Interceptions : 4
Rating : 92.8 (NFL.COM)

Fumbles (11) YIKES!

1 game of 100+ Yards
6 games of 200+ yards
2 games of 300+ yards



-------

I don't get it. I don't watch the Jaguars often, but how can you bench a rookie who is performing this well, and is only 2 games back from your division leader?

In my opinion these types of changes are what get a head coach fired.

DaFace 11-05-2019 07:55 PM

Those aren't great stats...

staylor26 11-05-2019 07:58 PM

Because they paid Foles a lot of money and Minshew is coming off his worst game of the season.

They have nothing to play for, so they might as well see what they have in Foles to help them make their decision in the offseason.

TripleThreat 11-05-2019 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 14577412)
Those aren't great stats...


Deshaun watson's rookie year,

(2 less games)
Percentage 61.8
Yards 1,699
Touchdowns 19
Interceptions 8
Rating 103

Watson had the better rookie year for sure, but many would argue he has/had a better supporting cast, and to be honest, looking at stats alone, (not film) you couldn't exactly point out who would/will have a better career IMO.

Easy 6 11-05-2019 08:08 PM

Because Foles has earned the right

Because rockstar Minshew still has some dues to pay

OrtonsPiercedTaint 11-05-2019 08:09 PM

SB MVP

eDave 11-05-2019 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14577418)
Because they paid Foles a lot of money and Minshew is coming off his worst game of the season.

They have nothing to play for, so they might as well see what they have in Foles to help them make their decision in the offseason.

Can say the same thing about Minshew.

wazu 11-05-2019 08:10 PM

I don’t think it really matters either way.

JakeF 11-05-2019 08:11 PM

Maybe Minshew is showing some mental fatigue. Jags may think he would be well-served by sitting back and absorbing everything he's learned this year. Minshew will probably be much better after a break.

Buehler445 11-05-2019 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14577418)
Because they paid Foles a lot of money and Minshew is coming off his worst game of the season.

They have nothing to play for, so they might as well see what they have in Foles to help them make their decision in the offseason.

Minshew magic wore off and they want to see what Foles can do.

DaFace 11-05-2019 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripleThreat (Post 14577424)
Deshaun watson's rookie year,

(2 less games)
Percentage 61.8
Yards 1,699
Touchdowns 19
Interceptions 8
Rating 103

Watson had the better rookie year for sure, but many would argue he has/had a better supporting cast, and to be honest, looking at stats alone, (not film) you couldn't exactly point out who would/will have a better career IMO.

I guess I don't understand what your point is. Above average rookies on a small sample size are inherently better than a proven vet for some reason?

Tell me about your feelings about benching Mahomes for Matt Moore...

Hoover 11-05-2019 08:25 PM

Because Big Dick Nick is going to help us by taking down the Colts this weekend!

Read that somewhere.

chiefforlife 11-05-2019 08:37 PM

Minshew was awful this week. 2 INTs and 2 fumbles. Looked bad when he wasnt turning the ball over.
Id go with Foles if i were them. He is a legit NFL QB. Minshew may be someday but his time is up for now.

staylor26 11-05-2019 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 14577441)
Can say the same thing about Minshew.

I understand that, but they’ve been watching Minshew for 9 weeks. They saw Foles for what a quarter?

Minshew blew his opportunity to continue showing them with a bad performance against a weak Texans secondary. Now it’s Foles turn.

By the end of the season they should have a good idea what they have in both QB’s and go from there.

DTVietnam 11-05-2019 08:44 PM

you posted 11 reasons in the OP

Megatron96 11-05-2019 08:58 PM

They have a lot of $$ invested in Foles.

At 4 and 5, mathematically they still have a chance to make the post-season.

Foles historically has been clutch in these kinds of moments.

BWillie 11-05-2019 09:13 PM

You do know Nick Foles is a Super Bowl champ, holds the NFL Pass TD record in a game and had the third best season of a QB ever right?

TripleThreat 11-05-2019 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 14577466)
I guess I don't understand what your point is. Above average rookies on a small sample size are inherently better than a proven vet for some reason?

Tell me about your feelings about benching Mahomes for Matt Moore...

I don’t think his rookie stats are bad at all. Then again i don’t watch jax football so maybe it’s a garbage time scenario?

However u said the stats aren’t that great so I brought up deshaun Watson’s stats from his rookie year to show how somewhat similar they are in some ways.

Watson was not a proven veteran his rookie year just like this guy isn’t a proven veteran because he’s in his rookie year.

Let’s not make up jokes about Moore and Mahomes.

TripleThreat 11-05-2019 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 14577515)
They have a lot of $$ invested in Foles.

At 4 and 5, mathematically they still have a chance to make the post-season.

Foles historically has been clutch in these kinds of moments.

I can see that and get behind that to be honest. He looked great with philly.

Just curious what people here are thinking about it since I don’t know much about their team.

BigCatDaddy 11-05-2019 09:22 PM

Remember when Mayfield looked good in a small sample size?

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2019 09:24 PM

Minshew hasn't been that great the past few weeks. I like the kid and if I'm a jags fan, I like the potential. But it's not a bad idea for him to learn more on the bench especially when you have foles who seems to get better as the season gets later.

Setsuna 11-05-2019 09:47 PM

Whatever needs to happen to get these fools fired I'm all for it.

wazu 11-05-2019 09:47 PM

I didn't realize he had 11 fumbles. That's nuts! Dave Kreig thinks he needs bigger hands.

St. Patty's Fire 11-05-2019 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripleThreat (Post 14577424)
Deshaun watson's rookie year,

(2 less games)
Percentage 61.8
Yards 1,699
Touchdowns 19
Interceptions 8
Rating 103

Watson had the better rookie year for sure, but many would argue he has/had a better supporting cast, and to be honest, looking at stats alone, (not film) you couldn't exactly point out who would/will have a better career IMO.

Watch the film

Minshew has a noticeably below average arm and can barely perform within a structured offense. Have you noticed all his big plays come off scramble drills or underthrown balls to DJ Chark?

rabblerouser 11-05-2019 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 14577441)
Can say the same thing about Minshew.

They've got 8 games of tape on Minshew. Now they can get 8 games of Foles on tape, which not only help them pick which QB for next year, but also rate the line and skill position supporting cast and whatnot.

Correct decision.

Doesn't matter, because either Marrone is gone in the offseason, or the whole front office and coaching staff is gone in the offseason.

MahiMike 11-06-2019 07:02 AM

Jeez

Chris Meck 11-06-2019 07:08 AM

Either way, they need Foles to play.

If he plays well, they trade him for high picks.

If he doesn't, then they know they want to roll with Minshew and they trade him for mid level picks or release him.

Either way, Foles is a commodity in a QB starved league.

Minshew may or may not be the answer.

Mayfield's regression-well, the whole team is underperforming. Kitchens appears to have been a horrible hire, and that's on Dorsey.

His next coach pick better be a good one.

ChiliConCarnage 11-06-2019 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 14577817)
Either way, they need Foles to play.

If he plays well, they trade him for high picks.

If he doesn't, then they know they want to roll with Minshew and they trade him for mid level picks or release him.

Well, they can't really release him as he's a massive cap hit. Other than that though I agree, they need to play Foles and see if he's there guy. Minshew's on a rookie contract, he's not going anywhere

ptlyon 11-06-2019 07:57 AM

Dave Kreig. Heh.

CaliforniaChief 11-06-2019 08:01 AM

Maybe you can hire Minshew to be your pool boy?

big nasty kcnut 11-06-2019 08:53 AM

Because a starter shouldn't lose his job due to injury.

bobbything 11-06-2019 09:10 AM

On one side they invested $50 million (guaranteed) in a proven SB quarterback. On the other, a 6th round pick and $2.7 million.

This isn't really up for debate. At all.

rabblerouser 11-06-2019 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by big nasty kcnut (Post 14577964)
Because a starter shouldn't lose his job due to injury.

Elvis Grbac should have..

xbarretx 11-06-2019 09:40 AM

*Clicks third choice....Because Gaz told him Foles was his boy.

FAX 11-06-2019 09:45 AM

Minchew Magic ran out. Just flat gone. Poof. Disappeared.

Still, Foles will get injured again soon so Minchew will get another bite of the pineapple.

FAX

Pasta Little Brioni 11-06-2019 10:46 AM

Because he's sucked really bad lately and cost them a shot at the division

oldman 11-06-2019 11:07 AM

I have 2 words -- Tim Tebow.

St. Patty's Fire 11-06-2019 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 14578170)
I have 2 words -- Tim Tebow.

Minshew is a much better QB than Tebow - he’s a well above average backup. He just isn’t a long term starter, though.

saphojunkie 11-06-2019 12:02 PM

The only answer is because Foles has a huge contract and was signed to be the starter. You can bring Foles back, let him steady the ship, and Mishew can learn behind him. It's going to be great for the rookie to have come in, have won four games, but also have seen adversity and realize it's more complicated than just slinging it.

This is the right decision.

Gravedigger 11-06-2019 12:05 PM

Because they paid Foles alot of money to be their QB and he got knocked out in the first game so they don't know what they have yet. Also they were keeping toe to toe with us until Foles got knocked out so if Foles gives them that ability to play with the best then they're going to use it. It makes sense.

DJ's left nut 11-06-2019 12:08 PM

{checks to see if DeBerg thread}

I mean really? This one seems pretty obvious. Gardner Minshew, if he's lucky, will be Alex Smith someday. You're not burying Pat Mahomes or Russell Wilson here. He's gonna be a solid but unspectacular game manager. When people were saying "wait until the league gets tape on Mahomes" it's because we live in a world where Gardner Minshews exist.

And when that's his apex and you can't release Foles next season either, you absolutely need to either 1) pump Foles value for a trade (which would actually be viable) or 2) Get him as many snaps in this system as possible so you can regroup around him next season to truly decide what you want to do with him from there.

Sticking with Minshew would be completely asinine. This isn't a guy with All-Pro potential - he's a walking meme who had a few good days and has also shown some truly awful tendencies that will be picked apart the more he is exposed. You don't bury a guy you're paying $45 million over 24 months for that.

TripleThreat 11-06-2019 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14578298)
{checks to see if DeBerg thread}

I mean really? This one seems pretty obvious. Gardner Minshew, if he's lucky, will be Alex Smith someday. You're not burying Pat Mahomes or Russell Wilson here. He's gonna be a solid but unspectacular game manager. When people were saying "wait until the league gets tape on Mahomes" it's because we live in a world where Gardner Minshews exist.

And when that's his apex and you can't release Foles next season either, you absolutely need to either 1) pump Foles value for a trade (which would actually be viable) or 2) Get him as many snaps in this system as possible so you can regroup around him next season to truly decide what you want to do with him from there.

Sticking with Minshew would be completely asinine. This isn't a guy with All-Pro potential - he's a walking meme who had a few good days and has also shown some truly awful tendencies that will be picked apart the more he is exposed. You don't bury a guy you're paying $45 million over 24 months for that.


Oh ok yeah I’m reeruned and so is my op then lmao. I had no idea Foles was being given that amount of $$ for 2 years and I also didn’t realize he was not playing because he was hurt.

My fault for not doing the research I suppose but that’s what I have this place for!

Setsuna 11-06-2019 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14578298)
{checks to see if DeBerg thread}

I mean really? This one seems pretty obvious. Gardner Minshew, if he's lucky, will be Alex Smith someday. You're not burying Pat Mahomes or Russell Wilson here. He's gonna be a solid but unspectacular game manager. When people were saying "wait until the league gets tape on Mahomes" it's because we live in a world where Gardner Minshews exist.

And when that's his apex and you can't release Foles next season either, you absolutely need to either 1) pump Foles value for a trade (which would actually be viable) or 2) Get him as many snaps in this system as possible so you can regroup around him next season to truly decide what you want to do with him from there.

Sticking with Minshew would be completely asinine. This isn't a guy with All-Pro potential - he's a walking meme who had a few good days and has also shown some truly awful tendencies that will be picked apart the more he is exposed. You don't bury a guy you're paying $45 million over 24 months for that.

Agreed. But the sad part he is better than anything we've had since Brunell and that's sad.

bringbackmarty 11-06-2019 09:30 PM

Foles is actually worth something to them in the short term and could possibly turn it around for them so the season isn't a total waste. He's a pro, had some decent coaching and they paid him. He needs to earn his salary. If the "Shoe" had 4-5 more touchdowns at this point in the season it's an entirely different story.

Why Not? 11-06-2019 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripleThreat (Post 14578953)
Oh ok yeah I’m reeruned and so is my op then lmao. I had no idea Foles was being given that amount of $$ for 2 years and I also didn’t realize he was not playing because he was hurt.

My fault for not doing the research I suppose but that’s what I have this place for!


Props to you for owing it and moving on. That being said....


How the hell did you not know Foles was hurt? It happened against the Chiefs

Why Not? 11-06-2019 09:36 PM

Oh and to answer the question anyway, one is a recent SB MVP and one lead his team to a record of....wait for it.....4-4. You could even say 4-5 if you wanted to count the Chiefs loss. I like the Minshew story as much as the next guy and he may develop in the future. Right now, he’s Jeremy Lin.

teedubya 11-06-2019 10:56 PM

Because he needs to shave that stupid mustache.

BryanBusby 11-06-2019 11:23 PM

Maybe they just didn't want to pay the money for a bench extension to house Foles cock


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.