ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Science NFL MVP vs SuperBowl Winning Team (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=327342)

TribalElder 12-13-2019 06:30 PM

NFL MVP vs SuperBowl Winning Team
 
The NFL MVP winner has not won the SuperBowl since Kurt Warner won the NFL MVP in 1999 and won the superbowl in 2000
https://i.imgur.com/UoywWCc.png

Lamar Jackson is winning the MVP but odds are against the ravens winning the SuperBowl

Discuss

ToxSocks 12-13-2019 06:35 PM

He can have the NFL MVP.

Been there, done that. /Yawn

We're shooting for SB MVP now.

Spott 12-13-2019 06:39 PM

Winning the MVP is right up there with the SI and Madden cover jinxes.

notorious 12-13-2019 06:40 PM

The last two Pats SB titles have the roman numerals LI and LIII.

Lie.

Interesting.

loochy 12-13-2019 06:41 PM

It doesn't matter. Correlation does not imply causation.

https://assets2.bigthink.com/system/...jpg?1364314851

KurtCobain 12-13-2019 07:05 PM

Julian Edelman and Nick Foles have been the last two Super Bowl MVPs and people say that star power is more important than system timing.

Chief Roundup 12-13-2019 07:16 PM

So it has never happened?

StockingAnarchy12 12-13-2019 07:35 PM

Need to remember that there are 32 teams. 12 playoff teams.

Every season there is one MVP. There is a 1/12 chance that a MVP wins a SB even if they make playoffs.

TribalElder 12-13-2019 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 14654227)
So it has never happened?

Yes last mvp to win the Super Bowl was Kurt Warner 19 years ago

frozenchief 12-13-2019 07:49 PM

I am not sold on Jackson yet. I think he's a mediocre passer who is playing behind a great O-line while his team has a great defense. If bad teams defend the pass, he can run wild on them. And if they defend the run, he's got a good enough O-line to buy him time to deal with the pressure. Against good teams, though, it's a different story:

Lamar Jackson has PASSED against some of the best and worst PASS defenses in the NFL

LJ in 7g vs teams ranked 20th or worse by DVOA: 124 of 174, 71.2% comp, 1,658 yards, 24 TD, 0 INT, 9.5 Y/A

In 7g vs teams in top 15: 121 of 196, 61.7%, 1,231 yards, 9 TD, 6 INT, 6.3 Y/A

He struggled against KC at a time when our pass defense had not really gelled. We are much better now against the pass. And the 49ers and the Bills showed that if you use your pass defense and do not give him time to make plays, he has a hard time making plays. Notice that <30% of his TDs came across teams in the top 50% of DVOA. Unlike a certain PMII.

Sofa King 12-13-2019 07:56 PM

It's a shame more non-QB's don't get to win MVP.

Maybe Offensive MVP and Defensive MVP would be more appropriate and get rid of some of the other awards.

Coochie liquor 12-13-2019 08:03 PM

I hope Lamar wins it, he deserves it. I also hope the streak of MVP’s not playing in the SB continues.

RaidersOftheCellar 12-13-2019 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frozenchief (Post 14654250)
I am not sold on Jackson yet. I think he's a mediocre passer who is playing behind a great O-line while his team has a great defense. If bad teams defend the pass, he can run wild on them. And if they defend the run, he's got a good enough O-line to buy him time to deal with the pressure. Against good teams, though, it's a different story:

Lamar Jackson has PASSED against some of the best and worst PASS defenses in the NFL

LJ in 7g vs teams ranked 20th or worse by DVOA: 124 of 174, 71.2% comp, 1,658 yards, 24 TD, 0 INT, 9.5 Y/A

In 7g vs teams in top 15: 121 of 196, 61.7%, 1,231 yards, 9 TD, 6 INT, 6.3 Y/A

He struggled against KC at a time when our pass defense had not really gelled. We are much better now against the pass. And the 49ers and the Bills showed that if you use your pass defense and do not give him time to make plays, he has a hard time making plays. Notice that <30% of his TDs came across teams in the top 50% of DVOA. Unlike a certain PMII.

That’s been my general feeling about him all year. He’s really feasted on the bad teams and bad defenses. And he’s just not an elite passer.

Doesn’t mean he won’t win the SB. Just means that they’re not the unbeatable machine they’re being made out to be. There are weaknesses to exploit in his game and their D.

staylor26 12-13-2019 08:07 PM

All this tells me is it’s due to happen again.

Too bad that wasn’t us last year.

PHOG 12-13-2019 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StockingAnarchy12 (Post 14654234)
Need to remember that there are 32 teams. 12 playoff teams.

Every season there is one MVP. There is a 1/12 chance that a MVP wins a SB even if they make playoffs.

Correctomundo

jerryaldini 12-13-2019 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frozenchief (Post 14654250)
I am not sold on Jackson yet. I think he's a mediocre passer who is playing behind a great O-line while his team has a great defense. If bad teams defend the pass, he can run wild on them. And if they defend the run, he's got a good enough O-line to buy him time to deal with the pressure. Against good teams, though, it's a different story:

Lamar Jackson has PASSED against some of the best and worst PASS defenses in the NFL

LJ in 7g vs teams ranked 20th or worse by DVOA: 124 of 174, 71.2% comp, 1,658 yards, 24 TD, 0 INT, 9.5 Y/A

In 7g vs teams in top 15: 121 of 196, 61.7%, 1,231 yards, 9 TD, 6 INT, 6.3 Y/A

He struggled against KC at a time when our pass defense had not really gelled. We are much better now against the pass. And the 49ers and the Bills showed that if you use your pass defense and do not give him time to make plays, he has a hard time making plays. Notice that <30% of his TDs came across teams in the top 50% of DVOA. Unlike a certain PMII.

Really solid Frozenchief. Can't wait for the AFCCG.

Baby Lee 12-13-2019 09:42 PM

Since the Pats have been in so many SBs, it kind of highlights that the Pats are at their weakest when Tom is called on to shine brightest.

KChiefs1 12-13-2019 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 14654254)
It's a shame more non-QB's don't get to win MVP.

Maybe Offensive MVP and Defensive MVP would be more appropriate and get rid of some of the other awards.


MVP is a QB award.

Offensive POY is for RB/WR’s.

Buehler445 12-13-2019 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StockingAnarchy12 (Post 14654234)
Need to remember that there are 32 teams. 12 playoff teams.

Every season there is one MVP. There is a 1/12 chance that a MVP wins a SB even if they make playoffs.

I have no clue what you’re getting at here. Your math makes no sense. If you’re trying to suggest that we’re limiting MVP to one player per team that would give you 1/32 chance. That’s pretty pointless too. Odds of any given team winning the super bowl aren’t ever 1:1.

No matter regardless.

If a team requires a ****load of stats passing (that’s what the MVP has been) that means they either can’t play D or can’t run the ball. Those teams aren’t set up the best to win the bowl. Teams that win the Super Bowl pretty much get plays from all 3 facets of the game.

Mile High Mania 12-14-2019 11:39 AM

Well, the Ravens are a bit of an oddity.

#2 in total offense (yards) @ 409.7 per game
#1 in points per game @ 33.7
#1 in total rushing per game @ 202.1
#25 in total passing per game @ 207.6

#6 in total defense (yards) @ 314.3 per game
#5 in points allowed per game @ 18.1
#9 in total passing yards allowed per game @ 218.1
#6 in total rushing yards allowed pre game @ 96.1

#6 overall in turnover ratio @ +10

Despite being the #25 passing offense, Jackson is #1 in the NFL with 33 TDs and only 6 INTs (66% completion). Add to that, he's #5 in the NFL total rushing with over 1100 yards and another 7 TDs.

I don't know how the past regular season MVPs break down with comparitive team stats for offense and defense, but damn... the Ravens are consistently dominant in damn near every category. And, I would imagine they are a lot different than the other situations with regular season MVP and what happens in the SB.

They are going to be an incredible matchup for any team in the playoffs... very hard to beat. And, yes - KC beat them @ Arrowhead by 5 in week 3 and both teams have had their issues and improved in various areas since then.

The Ravens are maddening.

Imon Yourside 12-14-2019 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 14654254)
It's a shame more non-QB's don't get to win MVP.

Maybe Offensive MVP and Defensive MVP would be more appropriate and get rid of some of the other awards.

It IS going to happen this year, RB Lamar Jackson is going to win it.

UK_Chief 12-14-2019 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 14654211)
It doesn't matter. Correlation does not imply causation.

https://assets2.bigthink.com/system/...jpg?1364314851

Mexican lorry drivers are better than the average US driver?

StockingAnarchy12 12-14-2019 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 14654396)
I have no clue what you’re getting at here. Your math makes no sense. If you’re trying to suggest that we’re limiting MVP to one player per team that would give you 1/32 chance. That’s pretty pointless too. Odds of any given team winning the super bowl aren’t ever 1:1.

No matter regardless.

If a team requires a ****load of stats passing (that’s what the MVP has been) that means they either can’t play D or can’t run the ball. Those teams aren’t set up the best to win the bowl. Teams that win the Super Bowl pretty much get plays from all 3 facets of the game.

I'm just saying there are 12 teams in the tournament if you count WC. The league MVP is usually one of those twelve teams. I brought up a similar point once on PatsFans where I noticed Qbs who throw 42+ (or was it 43?) rarely win SB. I was basically destroyed by a couple posters because they told me theres a 1/12 chance. So that is where my logic comes from. I admit my old opinion fits OP opinion, but 2-4 longtime fans blasted me for a similar opinion so I just assumed I was likely wrong.

TribalElder 02-03-2020 09:45 AM

BUMP

Would much rather have the Super Bowl MVP than the regular season MVP

TripleThreat 02-03-2020 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 14773404)
BUMP

Would much rather have the Super Bowl MVP than the regular season MVP

*Much rather have a

Warrick 02-03-2020 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 14773404)
BUMP

Would much rather have the Super Bowl MVP than the regular season MVP

We have both, how crazy is that? Just not in the same year... but soon though!

KChiefs1 02-06-2020 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14654206)
He can have the NFL MVP.

Been there, done that. /Yawn

We're shooting for SB MVP now.



Nailed it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.