ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Dak turns downs 5 year 175 million deal from Cowboys (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=331468)

Deberg_1990 05-21-2020 11:34 AM

Dak turns downs 5 year 175 million deal from Cowboys
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dak Prescott turned down a 5-year, $175 million contract offer from the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cowboys?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cowboys</a> according to <a href="https://twitter.com/CSimmsQB?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CSimmsQB</a> <br><br>It would&#39;ve made him the highest paid QB in history.<br><br>Prescott instead is seeking “north of $45M” in the final season of his new deal, reportedly. <a href="https://t.co/IBYCVaxVk7">pic.twitter.com/IBYCVaxVk7</a></p>&mdash; Dov Kleiman (@NFL_DovKleiman) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFL_DovKleiman/status/1263494399192899584?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

notorious 05-21-2020 11:36 AM

Jesus what a moron.

Well, we need to see the guaranteed money first, but it still looks like a bad decision.

MAG 05-21-2020 11:37 AM

i hate this guy

Gravedigger 05-21-2020 11:37 AM

**** him, tag him this year and get rid of him next year. Cmon Jerry, you and everyone else know Dak is not worth that money. Don't **** the whole league over by granting this prima donna his overinflated sense of himself. If I were Jerry, I'd take it as an insult, that this kid thinks I'm an idiot and can get fleeced. I'd call his bullshit and say "Do you think I'm a ****ing idiot?" These kids need to get slapped down. 75% of Patrick Mahomes, isn't Patrick Mahomes. Owners need to start understanding that these Dak like quarterbacks need to start being held to check or this inflation is going to get much much worse.

-King- 05-21-2020 11:39 AM

The fact that there's no mention of guaranteed money should tell you what you need to know about who leaked it and why.

R Clark 05-21-2020 11:39 AM

What a dumbass

ToxSocks 05-21-2020 11:40 AM

As Chris Simms explained (kinda odd this is hitting the newswire now, as it was a comment he said in passing about 2 weeks ago) this issue isn't the total dollar figure. It's the structure of the contract. Dak wants the final year of his contract to rival what a new contract would look like 5 years from now. Hence the 45M+.

Redbled 05-21-2020 11:41 AM

Is he even a top 10 QB? I think there are at least 10 I take over him.

Redbled 05-21-2020 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982380)
As Chris Simms explained (kinda odd this is hitting the newswire now, as it was a comment he said in passing about 2 weeks ago) this issue isn't the total dollar figure. It's the structure of the contract. Dak wants the final year of his contract to rival what a new contract would look like 5 years from now. Hence the 45M+.

Isn’t that just unheard of thinking? Not sure I’ve seen a contract that takes inflation into account.

Pablo 05-21-2020 11:47 AM

This pussy loser is named Dakota. LOL

New World Order 05-21-2020 11:48 AM

He’d be on a gravy train with biscuit wheels with that deal.

-King- 05-21-2020 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redbled (Post 14982384)
Is he even a top 10 QB? I think there are at least 10 I take over him.

He had 5300 total yards and 33 touchdowns last year. He's not Mahomes but there aren't 10 QBs better.

ToxSocks 05-21-2020 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redbled (Post 14982384)
Is he even a top 10 QB? I think there are at least 10 I take over him.

Mahomes
Wilson
Rodgers
Watson
Brees
Jackson
Wentz

and then....probably Dak Prescott, as far as the best QB's in football in 2020.

Sassy Squatch 05-21-2020 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982380)
As Chris Simms explained (kinda odd this is hitting the newswire now, as it was a comment he said in passing about 2 weeks ago) this issue isn't the total dollar figure. It's the structure of the contract. Dak wants the final year of his contract to rival what a new contract would look like 5 years from now. Hence the 45M+.

That's reeruned. He's butthurt he's getting his money too soon? What?

Baby Lee 05-21-2020 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 14982374)
**** him, tag him this year and get rid of him next year. Cmon Jerry, you and everyone else know Dak is not worth that money. Don't **** the whole league over by granting this pre-madonna his overinflated sense of himself. If I were Jerry, I'd take it as an insult, that this kid thinks I'm an idiot and can get fleeced. I'd call his bullshit and say "Do you think I'm a ****ing idiot?" These kids need to get slapped down. 75% of Patrick Mahomes, isn't Patrick Mahomes. Owners need to start understanding that these Dak like quarterbacks need to start being held to check or this inflation is going to get much much worse.

pre-madonna? What is that? Debbie Harry? Stevie Nicks?

Easy 6 05-21-2020 11:52 AM

Alex Smith 2.0

ChiTown 05-21-2020 11:54 AM

https://media1.tenor.com/images/f2c3...temid=17166418

Redbled 05-21-2020 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982395)
Mahomes
Wilson
Rodgers
Watson
Brees
Jackson
Wentz

and then....probably Dak Prescott, as far as the best QB's in football in 2020.

Some could argue to put Ryan there too.

I just don’t see that money for the 7th or 8th best QB. A healthy Big Ben May even be as valuable.

Gravedigger 05-21-2020 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redbled (Post 14982384)
Is he even a top 10 QB? I think there are at least 10 I take over him.

Patrick Mahomes
Aaron Rodgers
Drew Brees
Russell Wilson
Tom Brady
Lamar Jackson
Deshaun Watson
Ben Roethlisberger
Matt Ryan
Dak Prescott

I can think of at least five or six QBs that I would take over him. I think he's in that Deshaun Watson, Ben Roethlisberger and Matt Ryan area.

Sofa King 05-21-2020 11:58 AM

I'd like to see Stafford on a team with some actual talent around him.

notorious 05-21-2020 11:59 AM

Dallas is ****ing reeruned for even offering this.

Gravedigger 05-21-2020 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 14982404)
pre-madonna? What is that? Debbie Harry? Stevie Nicks?

Apologies, fixed.

RunKC 05-21-2020 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 14982421)
Dallas is ****ing reeruned for even offering this.

They don’t have a choice and Dak knows it. He’s got them right where he wants them.

Easy 6 05-21-2020 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14982430)
They don’t have a choice and Dak knows it. He’s got them right where he wants them.

I’d go get Dalton and tell Dak to **** himself... edit lol, they can now tell Dak to go **** himself

notorious 05-21-2020 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14982430)
They don’t have a choice and Dak knows it. He’s got them right where he wants them.

Their choice is to tell him to **** off and play with Dalton a year.

Draft, and give it another shot.

Dak isn't worth that amount of cap.

Sassy Squatch 05-21-2020 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 14982421)
Dallas is ****ing reeruned for even offering this.

Yes. In hindsight they should've told Prescott to **** off and used the money to keep their defense together.

ChiTown 05-21-2020 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 14982438)
I’d go get Dalton and tell Dak to **** himself

Andy Dalton is already signed at 1/$7MM as Dak's backup.

Easy 6 05-21-2020 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 14982446)
Andy Dalton is already signed at 1/$7MM as Dak's backup.

Heh, caught that about 30 seconds before you... just took my synapses a second to connect

eDave 05-21-2020 12:10 PM

$45M? LMAO

What's he thinking?

notorious 05-21-2020 12:11 PM

It's good to see this place still has fire when it comes to QB discussion.

We still feel echos of the past........

Jewish Rabbi 05-21-2020 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 14982418)
Patrick Mahomes
Aaron Rodgers
Drew Brees
Russell Wilson
Tom Brady
Lamar Jackson
Deshaun Watson
Ben Roethlisberger
Matt Ryan
Dak Prescott

I can think of at least five or six QBs that I would take over him. I think he's in that Deshaun Watson, Ben Roethlisberger and Matt Ryan area.

With the addition of Hopkins, I bet Murray is looked upon as a top 5 QB by the end of the year.

-King- 05-21-2020 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 14982438)
I’d go get Dalton and tell Dak to **** himself... edit lol, they can now tell Dak to go **** himself

Dalton has never had even close to the year Dak had last year.

notorious 05-21-2020 12:13 PM

I think Dalton will play pretty good in Dallas.

-King- 05-21-2020 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 14982451)
$45M? LMAO

What's he thinking?

That's going to be the going rate for franchise QBs in 5 years.

Easy 6 05-21-2020 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982464)
Dalton has never had even close to the year Dak had last year.

Sure but look where he played, the top to bottom worst franchise in the league... I’d take my chances before overpaying Alex Smith 2.0

Buehler445 05-21-2020 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982394)
He had 5300 total yards and 33 touchdowns last year. He's not Mahomes but there aren't 10 QBs better.

That makes a fair amount of sense.

But if someone flops that contract down in front of me I probably sign it. I mean come on. Unless his arm falls off or he shits the bed he’ll probably play it out.

FFS Kirk YOU LIKE THAT Cousins, who is not what I’d call good, didn’t play his way out of town on his contract.

RealSNR 05-21-2020 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982380)
As Chris Simms explained (kinda odd this is hitting the newswire now, as it was a comment he said in passing about 2 weeks ago) this issue isn't the total dollar figure. It's the structure of the contract. Dak wants the final year of his contract to rival what a new contract would look like 5 years from now. Hence the 45M+.


Unless the structure of the contract has language about Dak ****ing a sheep in Jerry’s office every Tuesday night or something extreme like that, I fail to see how that offer isn’t good for Dak.

I know I know... **** the billionaire owners. I get it. But I just don’t think the 10th best QB deserves to make top 3 money such that the value never goes out of date as the contract ages

ToxSocks 05-21-2020 12:21 PM

The problem is that NFL QB contracts aren't given out based on "how good you are compared to this guy". They're more or less "Next man up, next highest paid QB".

Mahomes will be the highest paid QB until the next guy gets paid.

Hell, there was a time when Derek Carr was the highest paid player in NFL history.

Right now it's Dak's turn.

ChiefBlueCFC 05-21-2020 12:21 PM

Well, I guess if you believe in yourself and value yourself way up there, I guess turn it down. But holy **** dude...

ToxSocks 05-21-2020 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14982489)

I know I know... **** the billionaire owners. I get it. But I just don’t think the 10th best QB deserves to make top 3 money such that the value never goes out of date as the contract ages

Sure, but that's not how NFL QB contracts go though. Dak is playing by the rules that NFL Owners/GM's set themselves up for.

tatorhog 05-21-2020 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982497)
Sure, but that's not how NFL QB contracts go though. Dak is playing by the rules that NFL Owners/GM's set themselves up for.

Agreed, but at some point that wheel will stop spinning.

ChiTown 05-21-2020 12:24 PM

Look, the numbers suggest that he's worth 5/$165-175MM. He turns 27 this Summer. There is NOTHING to suggest that he should get a penny more than $35MM/yr, and the 'Boys would be shit crazy to pay him any more than that. I get what he's doing, but it's totally unrealistic given the current market. Not only that, Dallas has a guy they can plug in TODAY who is a high level backup and can adequately get you through until the next season, if necessary.

-King- 05-21-2020 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 14982479)
Sure but look where he played, the top to bottom worst franchise in the league... I’d take my chances before overpaying Alex Smith 2.0

The Bengals weren't a terrible team before a couple years ago. They were on par with the Cowboys. He had AJ Green and only twice had over 4000 yards and once over 30 touchdowns. His best numbers are 4200 yards and 30 touchdowns and 20 INTs. Dak had 4900 passing yards, 30 touchdowns and 11 INTs. That's significantly better.

Beef Supreme 05-21-2020 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982491)
The problem is that NFL QB contracts aren't given out based on "how good you are compared to this guy". They're more or less "Next man up, next highest paid QB".

Mahomes will be the highest paid QB until the next guy gets paid.

Hell, there was a time when Derek Carr was the highest paid player in NFL history.

Right now it's Dak's turn.

Yeah, but someone is gonna have to draw a line somewhere. That shit is unsustainable with a salary cap. And salary cap is good for the league to keep it competitive.

And with rookie contracts being reasonable these days, and seemingly more decent QBs coming out of the draft these days than there used to be, you would be better off just drafting another one every year than paying top dollar to a dude that is pretty ****ing replaceable. Spend that money on the rest of your roster.

TomBarndtsTwin 05-21-2020 12:34 PM

Unreal.

He's offered THAT contract and refuses?!? He's arguably not even worth that type of contract.

If I was the Cowboys, I would try and flip him now for picks and just play Andy Dalton (who will look a lot better in that offense than he did in Cincy the last few years) and draft a QB in 2021 to learn under Andy, preparing to take over in 2022.

If not, play him under the franchise tag this year and trade him in the off-season (or let him walk for a comp pick if you don't feel like dealing with the headache or you think he might play another year under the tag since it goes up significantly in the 2nd year) and then followed with same scenario above (draft 2021 QB, play Dalton 2021, rookie QB takes over in 2022).

I get Dak trying to get as much as he can while he can get it, but his numbers on the field and his playoff performance are not compatible with that contract.

Dallas really just needs to tell him and his agent to **** off at this point. We offered you a fair deal and you turned it down. Moving on . . . . . .

TribalElder 05-21-2020 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAG (Post 14982373)
i hate this guy

This

**** Dak

He is dumb as hell and will end up on the outside looking in being greedy

On top of all that it's dumb as **** to be asking for 45 million in the final season, you ask for the big number up front otherwise you get cut in year 5 unless that is his plan

Mecca 05-21-2020 12:37 PM

Prescott really only wants a 4 year deal, the Cowboys are pushing for that 5th year because they think by then he'll be like the 8th highest paid QB...so he's pushing back that he wants a number that keeps him top 5...

-King- 05-21-2020 12:43 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Per source familiar with Prescott negotiations the report about a 5/175m offer with desire for $45 million in final year isn&#39;t accurate. Have been no meaningful discussions for some time between the sides so seems as if they are as far apart as they were a few months ago</p>&mdash; Jason_OTC (@Jason_OTC) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jason_OTC/status/1263523331107696640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To clarify any recent speculation on Dak Prescott’s contract negotiations: there have been no discussions on other scenarios other than the Cowboys wanting a longer deal and Prescott wanting a shorter deal, per source.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1263537030480433152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sassy Squatch 05-21-2020 12:43 PM

Rapoport and Schefter both saying this isn't true. Still a matter of Dak wanting 4 years and Cowboys wanting 5.

Baby Lee 05-21-2020 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982491)
The problem is that NFL QB contracts aren't given out based on "how good you are compared to this guy". They're more or less "Next man up, next highest paid QB".

Mahomes will be the highest paid QB until the next guy gets paid.

Hell, there was a time when Derek Carr was the highest paid player in NFL history.

Right now it's Dak's turn.

Yeah, for it being a business, there a lot of emotion in contract signings.

Particularly with QB, where there's just one starter per team, if you don't make your guy the highest paid when he's up for negotiation, you are signalling that you aren't buying the best available. Even if it's accurate, you don't want to send that message, and the players don't want to hear that message.

It's an analog to the mishegas in Green Bay picking a QB high when ARod is still around. Even as the top dog ages, you have to pretend he's going to play forever.

Mecca 05-21-2020 12:54 PM

As much as he's taking shit if Prescott got to the open market he'd get the contract he wants.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-21-2020 12:56 PM

I don't give a **** what his "stats" were. He isn't winning a title, so I think they are dumb as **** for even offering that. Barely a top 10 QB...if that

AGAIN..Don't.....give....a...shit...how many "yards" he had.

Lex Luthor 05-21-2020 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982377)
The fact that there's no mention of guaranteed money should tell you what you need to know about who leaked it and why.

I think you hit the nail on the head. It's hard to imagine ANYONE would turn down a contract like this, unless very little of it is actually guaranteed.

Stargazer 05-21-2020 12:58 PM

There is no way I'm doing this if I'm the Cowboys. Being saddled with this player would do more harm than good.

Sassy Squatch 05-21-2020 01:07 PM

Even with those gaudy stats the Cowboys still only managed 8-8 and failed to win the worst division in the NFL. He's only won one playoff game in his entire career. Blame Jason Garrett all you want but they're effectively replacing him with the same damn milquetoast mediocrity in Mike McCarthey so shit won't be getting better on that front, and now adding that insane contract on top of it all? Just doesn't make sense.

mr. tegu 05-21-2020 01:08 PM

The Cowboys were 0-8 when trailing at the half. 0-7 when trailing into the fourth quarter.

Mecca 05-21-2020 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stargazer (Post 14982618)
There is no way I'm doing this if I'm the Cowboys. Being saddled with this player would do more harm than good.

Are they going to do any better than him?

Prescott would get the contract he wants on the open market, if they were to walk on him that would be like saying because I got a 7 that isn't good enough till I get a 10...you then die old and alone because you never find it.

Because he isn't Mahomes doesn't mean he shouldn't get paid, the dude is better than any QB we had for 40 years until Mahomes came a long.

RealSNR 05-21-2020 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982497)
Sure, but that's not how NFL QB contracts go though. Dak is playing by the rules that NFL Owners/GM's set themselves up for.

Dak is bitching about making $35+ million five years from now because though he would be paid like a top 3 QB now, in that time he'll be closer to the 10th or so highest paid QB, which is no different than the contract extension process that Rodgers, Luck, Manning, and other top QBs have gone through before Dak.

Why is Dak so ****ing special that the game gets to be changed now that he's up to bat? If he's just playing the game the way it's set up and he gets top money that he doesn't deserve because it's just his turn, then why does he think he gets to be different than the other QBs and have a deal that doesn't show its age by the end of its span?

I'm not advocating for adopting a so-called league maximum offer like the NBA has, but this is getting kind of ridiculous.

Your starting RB is often on a day 2/3/undrafted rookie contract, and they're expected to account for sometimes upwards of 20% of a team's total offensive yardage output. They take the most punishment and wind up a brain in a jar if they manage to stick around the league for 7+ years, and they're told, "Sorry, we can't offer you that nice longterm extension. You're a RB." The best they can hope for is stringing together multiple seasons of fantasy football-relevant production and getting on the goddamn Campbell's Chunky Soup can.

The owners should have done something about THAT shit in the CBA.

Mecca 05-21-2020 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14982660)
Dak is bitching about making $35+ million five years from now because though he would be paid like a top 3 QB now, in that time he'll be closer to the 10th or so highest paid QB, which is no different than the contract extension process that Rodgers, Luck, Manning, and other top QBs have gone through before Dak.

Why is Dak so ****ing special that the game gets to be changed now that he's up to bat? If he's just playing the game the way it's set up and he gets top money that he doesn't deserve because it's just his turn, then why does he think he gets to be different than the other QBs and have a deal that doesn't show its age by the end of its span?

I'm not advocating for adopting a so-called league maximum offer like the NBA has, but this is getting kind of ridiculous.

Your starting RB is often on a day 2/3/undrafted rookie contract, and they're expected to account for sometimes upwards of 20% of a team's total offensive yardage output. They take the most punishment and wind up a brain in a jar if they manage to stick around the league for 7+ years, and they're told, "Sorry, we can't offer you that nice longterm extension. You're a RB." The best they can hope for is stringing together multiple seasons of fantasy football-relevant production and getting on the goddamn Campbell's Chunky Soup can.

He has leverage, I don't blame him to be honest. It's not like he made 30 mill off his rookie deal like some of the other guys.

rabblerouser 05-21-2020 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redbled (Post 14982384)
Is he even a top 10 QB? I think there are at least 10 I take over him.

PMII
Brees
Wilson
Brady
Watson
Rodgers
Ryan
Tannehill
Wentz
Murray

I put Wentz and Murray over Prescott. And even Brady's deflated balls with a pop gun arm at this point is better than Prescott.

Peter Gibbons 05-21-2020 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982395)
Mahomes
Wilson
Rodgers
Watson
Brees
Jackson
Wentz

and then....probably Dak Prescott, as far as the best QB's in football in 2020.

You are clearly forgetting Lock. Please re-read the last several months of the Donkey thread to refresh your memory on how elite his play has been.

rabblerouser 05-21-2020 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14982651)
Are they going to do any better than him?

Prescott would get the contract he wants on the open market

Who would pay him that, right now?

Sassy Squatch 05-21-2020 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 14982674)
Who would pay him that, right now?

Right this second? Possibly the Colts.

dlphg9 05-21-2020 01:15 PM

Mother****ers real name is Rayne. Lmfao. Wtf?

mr. tegu 05-21-2020 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 14982606)
I don't give a **** what his "stats" were. He isn't winning a title, so I think they are dumb as **** for even offering that. Barely a top 10 QB...if that

AGAIN..Don't.....give....a...shit...how many "yards" he had.


His stats are misleading anyways. He plays terrible when things are going bad around him. In 8 losses in 2019 he had 8 TDs, and 7 INTs.

Mecca 05-21-2020 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 14982674)
Who would pay him that, right now?

If he hits the market in a year?

Saints
Raiders
Broncos
Tampa
Pittsburgh
Jacksonville
Chicago


There are a lot of teams with old QB's nearing retirement or bad QB situations that would line up to pay money.

Mecca 05-21-2020 01:17 PM

Also if you are going to bust on Prescott then list Carson Wentz you lose credibility, dude gets hurt walking down the hall.

dirk digler 05-21-2020 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982513)
The Bengals weren't a terrible team before a couple years ago. They were on par with the Cowboys. He had AJ Green and only twice had over 4000 yards and once over 30 touchdowns. His best numbers are 4200 yards and 30 touchdowns and 20 INTs. Dak had 4900 passing yards, 30 touchdowns and 11 INTs. That's significantly better.


Marvin Lewis was his coach though.

MeaTy The Pimp 05-21-2020 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982464)
Dalton has never had even close to the year Dak had last year.


True, but I don't think that he ever had a comparable supporting cast around him either.

rabblerouser 05-21-2020 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14982688)
Also if you are going to bust on Prescott then list Carson Wentz you lose credibility, dude gets hurt walking down the hall.

Sure, the only thing positive about Prescott is h3 can take a beating.

So put Teddy Bridgewater on there. Taysom Hill. Joe Burrow. Matt Moore. Anyone but Dak Prescott.

DJ's left nut 05-21-2020 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14982380)
As Chris Simms explained (kinda odd this is hitting the newswire now, as it was a comment he said in passing about 2 weeks ago) this issue isn't the total dollar figure. It's the structure of the contract. Dak wants the final year of his contract to rival what a new contract would look like 5 years from now. Hence the 45M+.

Yes and no.

Because if it was just the final year of the deal that he was irritated about, they'd end up settling in on a 4 year deal instead.

It's an AAV issue if you really boil it down. Prescott would take less in year 5 if the AAV (and up front money) was high enough. He's essentially saying that the $35 million AAV is too low.

And let's be honest here - is Dak likely to repeat a 300 yard/gm season with any regularity going forward? He's smart to try to leverage as much out of this last season as possible. He had an excellent platform season and he's going to do everything he can to capitalize on that. Afterall, he's played 4 years on a 3rd rounder's deal - he's been wildly underpaid for awhile now.

And the Cowboys have done nothing to set up a plan B behind him, so he's got Jerrah by the nesmonds here. He's not gonna get tossed over the side for Cam Newton.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 05-21-2020 01:36 PM

Dak can sell some anxiety concessions

Bump 05-21-2020 01:36 PM

There's a lot of stupid going on there. First for the cowboys to even offer him that much and 2nd for Dak turning that down. The ****

DJ's left nut 05-21-2020 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982513)
The Bengals weren't a terrible team before a couple years ago. They were on par with the Cowboys. He had AJ Green and only twice had over 4000 yards and once over 30 touchdowns. His best numbers are 4200 yards and 30 touchdowns and 20 INTs. Dak had 4900 passing yards, 30 touchdowns and 11 INTs. That's significantly better.

Dalton was never anything more than AJ Green's Jugs machine.

Dalton spends the last 3-4 years as a backup but/for Green inflating his numbers. And even at that, he wasn't all that good. Dalton is as JAG as they get.

DJ's left nut 05-21-2020 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 14982756)
There's a lot of stupid going on there. First for the cowboys to even offer him that much and 2nd for Dak turning that down. The ****

Phillip Rivers just got $25 million from the Colts.

Yes, there are plenty of teams that would give him $35 million/yr for 5 years over his prime. Would it be a smart decision for them? Hard to say - really depends on their team. But if he were a free agent, he'd get something approaching that. Maybe $33 million, maybe $37 million, but there is enough cap space out there that somebody would give him that.

Easy 6 05-21-2020 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14982513)
The Bengals weren't a terrible team before a couple years ago. They were on par with the Cowboys. He had AJ Green and only twice had over 4000 yards and once over 30 touchdowns. His best numbers are 4200 yards and 30 touchdowns and 20 INTs. Dak had 4900 passing yards, 30 touchdowns and 11 INTs. That's significantly better.

You’re welcome to your opinion, but paying second tier guys first tier money is a surefire way to hamstring your franchise for years to come IMO

You can point to stats all you want, but Dalton is by far the better pure passer

Mecca 05-21-2020 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 14982774)
You’re welcome to your opinion, but paying second tier guys first tier money is a surefire way to hamstring your franchise for years to come IMO

You can point to stats all you want, but Dalton is by far the better pure passer

You do realize if they don't pay him they're flushing all of the current roster talent right?

Easy 6 05-21-2020 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14982783)
You do realize if they don't pay him they're flushing all of the current roster talent right?

Not sure I follow... you mean because Dalton couldn’t maximize their talent as well as Dak?

Mecca 05-21-2020 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 14982799)
Not sure I follow... you mean because Dalton couldn’t maximize their talent as well as Dak?

Andy Dalton is a scrub.

RINGLEADER 05-21-2020 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14982396)
That's reeruned. He's butthurt he's getting his money too soon? What?

It’s not stupid to ask for it. It is stupid to walk away from life money over what your deal looks like 5 years from now. If he’s worth $45m then he’d probably just want a new agreement and if he’s not they’ll just cut him so not sure I understand his logic?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.