ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Would we be going for title number 3 in a row if Hunt wasnt released? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=333675)

Titty Meat 09-17-2020 09:29 PM

Would we be going for title number 3 in a row if Hunt wasnt released?
 
For Pitt Gorilla.

Hunt looks amazing like he did at times last year and his whole time as a Chief.

However William's I believe set some records for post season touchdowns.



Discuss.

Mama Hip Rockets 09-17-2020 09:43 PM

Let it go, man.

Jewish Rabbi 09-17-2020 09:45 PM

I’m not one of those bitches who whine about Hunt being released, but yes, I find it hard to believe they wouldn’t have won SB 53 with him on the roster.

ThaVirus 09-17-2020 09:46 PM

Wouldn't he have been suspended or on the exempt list during the 2018 postseason run?

staylor26 09-17-2020 09:46 PM

:facepalm:

How many times does it have to be explained that Hunt wasn’t playing again in 2018 whether we released him or not?

Rasputin 09-17-2020 09:47 PM

Our offense put up 31 points in the second half to force overtime against Patriots in AFC championship.



**** you Dee Ford.

smithandrew051 09-17-2020 09:48 PM

The real question is would we be worse in the long-run if we won 53?

I’m not sure Veach would’ve had the balls to overhaul that defense nor do I think Reid would’ve fired Sutton. Hell, we might’ve even extended Ford.

Also, Kareem screwed Kareem. Don’t be a ****ing idiot and things tend to work out better in life.

lewdog 09-17-2020 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15174874)
:facepalm:

How many times does it have to be explained that Hunt wasn’t playing again in 2018 whether we released him or not?

Every day for Billay's alcohol induced dementia.

KC Hawks 09-17-2020 09:49 PM

This board's obsession with Kareem Hunt is ****ing weird. You'd think we hadn't done anything without him.

comochiefsfan 09-17-2020 09:50 PM

Would they have won if the video didn’t exist?

Yes.

Does it matter now?

No.

I miss Kareem as much as anybody. His style of play has always been really fun to watch for me. But he’s gone. We won the super bowl without him. We have a guy now who is younger, cheaper and potentially a better fit for what Andy is trying to do.

We’re defending super bowl champions. The era of “what if” and “woe is me” for this fanbase needs to end.

ChiefsCountry 09-17-2020 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 15174882)
This board's obsession with Kareem Hunt is ****ing weird. You'd think we hadn't done anything without him.

Most of it is that ****ing loser Pitt Gorilla.

Titty Meat 09-17-2020 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15174874)
:facepalm:

How many times does it have to be explained that Hunt wasn’t playing again in 2018 whether we released him or not?

It was his first offense bruh

FloridaMan88 09-17-2020 09:51 PM

Only if he had kicked Bob Sutton rather than the chick.

KCrockaholic 09-17-2020 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 15174880)
The real question is would we be worse in the long-run if we won 53?

I’m not sure Veach would’ve had the balls to overhaul that defense nor do I think Reid would’ve fired Sutton. Hell, we might’ve even extended Ford.

Also, Kareem screwed Kareem. Don’t be a ****ing idiot and things tend to work out better in life.

Pretty good point :thumb:. Butterfly effect.

Direckshun 09-17-2020 09:59 PM

I think the primary person to blame for us failing to win a title in 2018 was Bob Sutton. Right behind him, though, is Brett Veach.

He failed to sign or draft or trade for a single defensive playmaker. If he had, maybe the Chiefs can stop a runny nose in the AFCCG and we win the game.

Dee Ford is probably third.

But Bob Sutton is clearly the #1 culprit.

KChiefs1 09-17-2020 10:01 PM

Simple answer: Yes

I think they would have went undefeated last year too.

Titty Meat 09-17-2020 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 15174901)
I think the primary person to blame for us failing to win a title in 2018 was Bob Sutton. Right behind him, though, is Brett Veach.

He failed to sign or draft or trade for a single defensive playmaker. If he had, maybe the Chiefs can stop a runny nose in the AFCCG and we win the game.

Dee Ford is probably third.

But Bob Sutton is clearly the #1 culprit.

Yeah I refuse to believe Sutton had zero input in thinking Speaks could be a productive OLB.

DJ has pointed out Mathieu was there to be signed but then I guess the question is whats his value after a ring and could we have resigned him?

The last one not on your list is Berry. I'm curious what he himself and the Chiefs knew.

Looking back at that first half theres no doubt BB owned Reid. Reid owned the 2nd half but maybe we dont get shut out with Hunt that first half.

It's a fun what if game.

Kiimo 09-17-2020 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 15174907)
Simple answer: Yes

I think they would have went undefeated last year too.

:rolleyes:

frozenchief 09-17-2020 11:09 PM

Logically this is known as an “argument contrary to facts.” It means that the whole thing is speculation and fruitless. There is no way of knowing because it didn’t happen. Thus, considering, discussing, pondering, or analyzing this topic is ultimately a waste of time.

tk13 09-17-2020 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 15174880)
The real question is would we be worse in the long-run if we won 53?

I’m not sure Veach would’ve had the balls to overhaul that defense nor do I think Reid would’ve fired Sutton. Hell, we might’ve even extended Ford.

Also, Kareem screwed Kareem. Don’t be a ****ing idiot and things tend to work out better in life.

We would also be in the last year of Hunt's contract, and might very well have been forced to give him a Kamara/Dalvin Cook type contract, given what we just saw those two do in the last year of their deals. They pushed their teams into big deals in the last year of their rookie deals.

Do we re-sign Hill, Kelce and Chris Jones if we're giving Hunt 70 million?

suzzer99 09-17-2020 11:22 PM

I think OP means if Hunt was still playing through the end of 2018. Basically if that film never surfaced or if the dumbass just stopped his kick a foot shorter. That is the interesting question.

Third Eye 09-17-2020 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frozenchief (Post 15174979)
Logically this is known as an “argument contrary to facts.” It means that the whole thing is speculation and fruitless. There is no way of knowing because it didn’t happen. Thus, considering, discussing, pondering, or analyzing this topic is ultimately a waste of time.

Isn’t that kind of the point of a sports message board?

RealSNR 09-17-2020 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 15174886)
It was his first offense bruh

He was commissioner exempted the rest of the 2018 season and didn't get taken off the list until the offseason.

That was an NFL thing. Not a Chiefs thing.

He wasn't playing for us. He wasn't playing for anybody else, either. The Chiefs could have screamed as loud as they could at the NFL and it wouldn't have mattered. He wasn't going to play another down that year.

Also, **** Kareem Hunt. I hope he dies so everybody on this place shuts the **** up about him.

We won a Super Bowl, and the only thing that makes me happier than winning a Super Bowl is winning a Super Bowl without a selfish butt****ing moron like Kareem Hunt on the team. He gets what he wanted-- to play in his shitty awful home state of Ohio with all his loser trash friends and party it up in hotels and kick women and get caught.

If Lamar Jackson and Kyler Murray had a reerun baby together, that kid would have more braincells than Kareem Hunt.

Why Not? 09-17-2020 11:40 PM

Things that have happened since Hunt was released:

A. Chiefs win SB

B. Chiefs draft and employ a running back who seems to have been made in a lab just for Andy Reid’s offense.

C. Kareem Hunt runs over the Bengals (missing their best defensive player, I might add) and rather than focus on A and B, some fans want to daydream about irrelevant what if scenarios.

Don’t make much sense to me.

Shoes 09-18-2020 01:29 AM

The defense was so ****ing bad with Sutton (I was a Sutton apologist before the end of the 2018 szn also).

Chiefs needed to lose in the fashion they did to the Patriots in order to jettison ol’ man Sutton, bring in Spags and put a spotlight on the need of a defensive leadership overhaul.

DRM08 09-18-2020 01:59 AM

The main problem was the horrible defense caused by Bob Sutton, Eric Berry contract, Justin Houston contract, Anthony Hitchens contract, Dee Ford offsides, etc. All they needed was one damn stop at the end to win that game.

lcarus 09-18-2020 02:18 AM

We'd be going for the 3rd Super Bowl if Kareem didn't kick a bitch and/or Dee Ford didn't line up offsides.

TwistedChief 09-18-2020 04:38 AM

Next up on Chiefs hypotheticals: would we be going for title number 3 if Haglund's didn't exist?

Red Dawg 09-18-2020 04:47 AM

Yes.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 09-18-2020 05:30 AM

Greed is a fun killing bitch

tredadda 09-18-2020 05:54 AM

Not sure how having Hunt would have allowed us to get to or win SB 53. It was our defense that failed us, not the offense.

mr. tegu 09-18-2020 06:47 AM

How much would we have to be paying him for slightly better production at the position than the pennies we pay for it now?

ChiTown 09-18-2020 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 15175057)
Next up on Chiefs hypotheticals: would we be going for title number 3 if Haglund's didn't exist?

https://media.tenor.com/images/ca690...4905/tenor.gif

ThyKingdomCome15 09-18-2020 07:24 AM

It cost us a ring.

But then again, getting Spags may win us many more.

ChiTown 09-18-2020 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 15175134)
It cost us a ring.

But then again, getting Spags may win us many more.

It cost us a ring? How? Last I checked, it was the D that couldn’t make a stop In the AFC CG, and a Defensive player that made a HUGE penalty that cost us an opportunity to get to the SB. It wasn’t a lack of KH, IMO.

AdolfOliverBush 09-18-2020 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 15174995)
He was commissioner exempted the rest of the 2018 season and didn't get taken off the list until the offseason.

That was an NFL thing. Not a Chiefs thing.

He wasn't playing for us. He wasn't playing for anybody else, either. The Chiefs could have screamed as loud as they could at the NFL and it wouldn't have mattered. He wasn't going to play another down that year.

Also, **** Kareem Hunt. I hope he dies so everybody on this place shuts the **** up about him.

We won a Super Bowl, and the only thing that makes me happier than winning a Super Bowl is winning a Super Bowl without a selfish butt****ing moron like Kareem Hunt on the team. He gets what he wanted-- to play in his shitty awful home state of Ohio with all his loser trash friends and party it up in hotels and kick women and get caught.

If Lamar Jackson and Kyler Murray had a reerun baby together, that kid would have more braincells than Kareem Hunt.

BOOM! Roasted. **** Kareem Hunt.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-18-2020 07:41 AM

WooHoo, just think how nice our backfield would be now with Hunt/CEH. Damn!

I hate Dee Ford. He's the REAL reason we're not going for #3.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 09-18-2020 07:43 AM

Chief fans should have red parts on Fridays. I guess a chapped ass qualifies

Chiefspants 09-18-2020 07:49 AM

If Kareem being on the roster would have won us a championship, the only person to blame is Kareem.

wazu 09-18-2020 07:50 AM

I think there's a better chance we'd still be looking for our first title.

Damien Williams was outstanding in both post-seasons. Kareem probably would have been as well, but I'm not sure he would have been better. I also think that given chaos theory the entire 2019 season would've played out differently across the NFL. Crazy big changes like what if Baltimore made it to the AFC Championship game? Does some random thing result in us having a key injury to a player that derails our season? Do we draft all the same players in 2019?

Spott 09-18-2020 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 15175134)
It cost us a ring.

But then again, getting Spags may win us many more.

Agreed. We might have won in 2018 with Hunt, but the defense would have still been terrible last year and we likely would have been looking for a new D Coordinator after the 2019 season.

FloridaMan88 09-18-2020 08:44 AM

How many Super Bowls would the Chiefs have won if Carl kept Gannon over Grbac?

How many beaten dead horse what if’s can we bring up.

F150 09-18-2020 08:51 AM

https://64.media.tumblr.com/15bdf418...38141ec273.jpg

ChiefBlueCFC 09-18-2020 08:57 AM

WE MISSED THE SUPER BOWL BECAUSE DEE FORD LINED UP OFFSIDES. HOPE THIS HELPS

Marcellus 09-18-2020 09:00 AM

Amazing how Billay can take the cock out of his mouth long enough to make a stupid thread at least once a week.

Frazod 09-18-2020 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 15175089)
Not sure how having Hunt would have allowed us to get to or win SB 53. It was our defense that failed us, not the offense.

It sure as **** failed in the first half. People seem to forget that 14-0 halftime hole they had to dig out of. Could Hunt have made a difference? Yeah, probably. If we're down 7 instead of 14, or down 11 instead of 14.... ugh. :banghead:

It's great that we are where we are now, but one Super Bowl doesn't cancel out all the heartbreaking, missed-it-by-that-much losses we suffered through.

TEX 09-18-2020 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175234)
It sure as **** failed in the first half. People seem to forget that 14-0 halftime hole they had to dig out of. Could Hunt have made a difference? Yeah, probably. If we're down 7 instead of 14, or down 11 instead of 14.... ugh. :banghead:

It's great that we are where we are now, but one Super Bowl doesn't cancel out all the heartbreaking, missed-it-by-that-much losses we suffered through.


True. BUT I took EXTREME satisfaction in beating the team Dee Ford was on in the Super Bowl the following year! Watching him do NOTHING, while watching our NEW #55 WRECK SF at crunch time was AWESOME! :clap:

Chris Meck 09-18-2020 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175234)
It sure as **** failed in the first half. People seem to forget that 14-0 halftime hole they had to dig out of. Could Hunt have made a difference? Yeah, probably. If we're down 7 instead of 14, or down 11 instead of 14.... ugh. :banghead:

It's great that we are where we are now, but one Super Bowl doesn't cancel out all the heartbreaking, missed-it-by-that-much losses we suffered through.

Yes it does. It absolutely does.

Why are people still whining about Kareem Hunt? He's a dumb****, and the NFL took action. It's done, it's history, and we're world champions.

I don't give a single **** about Kareem Hunt.

RealSNR 09-18-2020 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 15175393)
True. BUT I took EXTREME satisfaction in beating the team Dee Ford was on in the Super Bowl the following year! Watching him do NOTHING, while watching our NEW #55 WRECK SF at crunch time was AWESOME! :clap:

Niners fans: "Quit crowing, Chiefs fans. Ford was still gimpy from his injury in the Super Bowl."

Chiefs fans: "Exactly."

Frazod 09-18-2020 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15175425)
Yes it does. It absolutely does.

Why are people still whining about Kareem Hunt? He's a dumb****, and the NFL took action. It's done, it's history, and we're world champions.

I don't give a single **** about Kareem Hunt.

Well, I'm glad it does for you. But for me, one championship doesn't make five decades of suck instantly vanish.

Sorce 09-18-2020 11:50 AM

If we beat the pats and win the superbowl, sutton doesn't get fired we don't majorly overhaul the defense we may not win last year.

Bowser 09-18-2020 12:01 PM

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0Hlyo...ISo8/giphy.gif

Easy 6 09-18-2020 12:17 PM

Kareem who?

You mean Abdul Jabbar?

RaidersOftheCellar 09-18-2020 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 15174907)
Simple answer: Yes

I think they would have went undefeated last year too.

Apparently Hunt is Barry Sanders and Jim Brown combined into one.

Eleazar 09-18-2020 12:28 PM

He can't even establish himself as the lead back in Cleveland. He was a product of our offense.

RaidersOftheCellar 09-18-2020 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 15174907)
Simple answer: Yes

I think they would have went undefeated last year too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 15175573)
He can't even establish himself as the lead back in Cleveland. He was a product of our offense.

Seriously...

There’s a reason every player looks their best on the Chiefs. Especially in the Mahomes era.

RealSNR 09-18-2020 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175468)
Well, I'm glad it does for you. But for me, one championship doesn't make five decades of suck instantly vanish.

We're better off without him, in my opinion.

We've got a potentially better RB for what we do on offense with fewer miles on him that will be on his cheap rookie deal much longer into the Mahomes years.

Hunt would have required a Dalvin Cook-type extension if he weren't an idiot doofus who gets into trouble. His extension he got from Cleveland pales in comparison to what he was in line for, if not from us then from some other team.

Marcellus 09-18-2020 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175234)
It sure as **** failed in the first half. People seem to forget that 14-0 halftime hole they had to dig out of. Could Hunt have made a difference? Yeah, probably. If we're down 7 instead of 14, or down 11 instead of 14.... ugh. :banghead:

It's great that we are where we are now, but one Super Bowl doesn't cancel out all the heartbreaking, missed-it-by-that-much losses we suffered through.

I fail to see where our run game was the issue in the first half of that game. There is literally zero evidence Hunt would have made any difference. And he wouldn't have been eligible to play anyway he was suspended by the league.

Chris Meck 09-18-2020 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175468)
Well, I'm glad it does for you. But for me, one championship doesn't make five decades of suck instantly vanish.

what does Kareem Hunt have to do with 5 decades of suck? Nothing.

What did Kareem Hunt have to do with Dee Ford being offsides? Nothing.

Who ****ing cares?

Chiefspants 09-18-2020 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 15175591)
I fail to see where our run game was the issue in the first half of that game. There is literally zero evidence Hunt would have made any difference.

He wouldn’t have. He would have been on the commissioner exempt list even if he were on the roster.

Kareem did it to himself and the video of his recent traffic stop doesn’t inspire confidence that he’s changed his behavior since.

Chris Meck 09-18-2020 12:46 PM

We're the defending champions, with the best player in football, who is TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OLD.

We're in good shape to defend that title. We'll be in good shape in 2021, too. With Reid, Veach, and Mahomes, we'll be fielding contenders for the forseeable future.

I don't get why anyone is wet blanketing over Kareem ****ing Hunt. Who ****ing cares?

Frazod 09-18-2020 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15175595)
what does Kareem Hunt have to do with 5 decades of suck? Nothing.

What did Kareem Hunt have to do with Dee Ford being offsides? Nothing.

Who ****ing cares?

I didn't even mention Hunt in my last post. His absence only potentially affected one devastating playoff loss. There were so many others.

I didn't get a memory wipe on February 2. I still remember them all. My whole point is one Super Bowl doesn't make them all magically go away.

Chiefspants 09-18-2020 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175658)
I didn't even mention Hunt in my last post. His absence only potentially affected one devastating playoff loss. There were so many others.

I didn't get a memory wipe on February 2. I still remember them all. My whole point is one Super Bowl doesn't make them all magically go away.

I made the mistake of thinking the Super Bowl would let me watch Marty’s A Football Life from an objective standpoint.

I was wrong. Marty’s A Football Life makes Se7en feel like it had a happy ending.

Chris Meck 09-18-2020 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 15175658)
I didn't even mention Hunt in my last post. His absence only potentially affected one devastating playoff loss. There were so many others.

I didn't get a memory wipe on February 2. I still remember them all. My whole point is one Super Bowl doesn't make them all magically go away.

It's the past man. It's over.

At least in Chiefsland, the present and future are great. Why you want to wallow?

Frazod 09-18-2020 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15175741)
It's the past man. It's over.

At least in Chiefsland, the present and future are great. Why you want to wallow?

It's a wallowy thread. :D

Reerun_KC 09-18-2020 01:36 PM

Yes

PHOG 09-18-2020 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 15175183)
Agreed. We might have won in 2018 with Hunt, but the defense would have still been terrible last year and we likely would have been looking for a new D Coordinator after the 2019 season.

This :thumb: We probably would still have Dee ****ing Ford also. :mad:

oldman 09-18-2020 01:57 PM

Hunt was suspended, moot question. Move along.

scho63 09-18-2020 01:58 PM

Would you be straight if you stopped sucking dicks?

Discuss

RealSNR 09-18-2020 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 15175801)
Would you be straight if you stopped sucking dicks?

Discuss

You can take the dick out of the man's butthole, but you can't take the man's butthole out of the dick

Eleazar 09-18-2020 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 15175799)
Hunt was suspended, moot question. Move along.

Maybe the idea is that he would have been eating nachos in the press box so powerfully it would have stopped the Patriots from running the ball down our throat 50 times

Bowser 09-18-2020 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 15175804)
You can take the dick out of the man's butthole, but you can't take the man's butthole out of the dick

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Kky3-XeLlqw/maxresdefault.jpg

Wallcrawler 09-18-2020 03:14 PM

Hunt had no bearing on our failure. Williams balled out. Played out of his mind in both post seasons. The RB position was not to blame for the loss to Brady.

It took Andy not even getting the ball in OT of the afc title game because his putrid ****ing defense led by grandpa Bob Sutton surrendered THREE third and long plays on the drive that the Patriots bent him over and pushed his shit in to FINALLY fire his friend.

No, we would not be going for title 3. We likely would have one title, had Dee Ford been able to handle the complexity of lining up on his own side of the ball, in which Patrick Mahomes dragged that pathetic _fense, kicking and screaming to a championship. He would be more legendary than he is now, having been the only reason we won a title, but I don't see him able to keep up that pace to offset a defense that seemed to believe its objective is to give up points as fast as Mahomes can score them.

Look what he had to do to overcome that. 5000+ yards, 50 TDs, everything on him.

Losing that title game hurt badly. But the team got SO much better in that forced purge where Reid had no choice but to acknowledge that Sutton and his staff simply were not up to the challenge.

We are now set up to be the odds on favorite for the forseeable future.

Hunt would have been nice to have, but he screwed us, his teammates, and himself. He could have been a champion, a star player on an amazing offense. Instead, he will spend his time playing football for a team that likely does not see post season play.

Kareem Hunt is a fantastic football player, and an unfathomably stupid person. He should thank his lucky stars he is still able to play, and make decent money.

JohnnyHammersticks 09-19-2020 07:28 AM

Well, we lost to the Rams with Hunt, and they were who we would've played in the SB.

YontsRBake 09-19-2020 08:02 AM

Having Hunt wouldn't have made Sutton suddenly not be the worst DC in football.

Wallcrawler 09-19-2020 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyHammersticks (Post 15177219)
Well, we lost to the Rams with Hunt, and they were who we would've played in the SB.

Shit take.

The Rams that showed up in the Superbowl were not the same Rams we played in that Monday night shootout.

Cooper Kupp was out with an ACL, and Gurley was clearly hurt.

In the first meeting, against a healthy Rams team in LA, we turned the football over FIVE TIMES, twice for touchdowns, and lost the game BY THREE POINTS.

If you truly believe that given a rematch, that Mahomes would still turn it over five times, then youre a knuckle dragging mouth breathing butt ****ing moron.

BossChief 09-19-2020 03:15 PM

The real question is

Would the Chiefs be going for the three peat if Kareem Hunt didn’t act a fool in the hallway and then lie about it?

I’d say yes

CasselGotPeedOn 09-19-2020 03:19 PM

If we win the SB in '18, I think Andy most likely keeps Sutton. I have serious doubts we repeat with Bob as DC last season.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.